Strasbourg, 27 September 2018
CEPEJ/TP/OJ(2018)1Prov2
EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR THE EFFICIENCY OF JUSTICE
(CEPEJ)
NETWORK OF PILOT COURTS
13th plenary meeting
Council of Europe, Agora Building - Room G03
10 October 2018
The aim of this annual meeting is to gather the opinion, comments and feedback of the legal practitioners who make up the Network of Pilot Courts on the various ongoing work of the CEPEJ.
The afternoon session will be organised in the form of workshops.
DRAFT AGENDA
President : Georg STAWA (Austria), President of the CEPEJ
1. Opening of the meeting
2. CEPEJ activity: main achievements and priorities
3. Information by the Pilot Courts
The pilot courts are invited to inform the Network of any reform, initiative or good practice implemented by the court and likely to interest the other pilot courts.
(If a court wishes its initiative/good practice to be included in this agenda, please send a request to the Secretariat as soon as possible and by all means before the meeting)
4. Establishment of European timeframes for judicial procedures
- Implementation, by the pilot courts, of the CEPEJ European timeframes for judicial proceedings
- Update/Revision of these timeframes by detailing the categories of cases: summary of replies to the questionnaire sent to the Network concerning the classification of cases used by the pilot courts
- Discussion
Reference documents
Towards European timeframes – Implementation guide
Pilot courts – Questionnaireand replies concerning the categorisation of cases
5. Role of parties and practitioners in judicial timeframes
- Exchange of views on the content of the document on the role of parties and practitioners in judicial timeframes and its possible development
Reference document
The role of parties and practitioners in avoiding or reducing delay in disposal of court proceedings
6. Cases weighting
- Presentation by willing pilot courts of their case weighting systems
- Exchange of views on the content of the document on case weighting
Reference document
Case weighting in European judicial systems
7. Definition of a « pending case »
- Synthesis of replies to the questionnaire sent to the Network concerning the definition of a “pending case” by the pilot courts
- Discussion
Reference document
Pilot courts – Questionnaireand replies on the definition of a pending case
8. Dashboards[1] used in courts
- Presentation by willing pilot courts of their dashboards
- Discussion
9. Mediation
- Presentation of the "Mediation Development Toolkit" prepared by the CEPEJ Working Group on Mediation (CEPEJ-GT-MED) and adopted by the CEPEJ at its 30th plenary meeting (27-29 June 2018), as well as the Roadmap of the CEPEJ-GT-MED
- Discussion
Reference documents
Mediation Development Toolkit
Roadmap for mediation
10. Improving the quality of the judge’s work through better knowledge-sharing and collaboration
- Presentation of the work of the CEPEJ-GT-QUAL in this field
- Discussion
11. Other questions
12. Conclusions of the meeting
Reference document
Report "European judicial systems – Efficiency and quality of justice
2018 Edition – CEPEJ Studies N° 26"
WORKSHOPS The afternoon's activities will be organised as workshops concerning some items on the agenda. These workshops will allow exchanges in smaller groups and more informal discussions. The content of the discussions during these workshops will enrich the ongoing work of the CEPEJ-SATURN Centre and the CEPEJ-GT-QUAL. This year, the following workshops are proposed: · Workshop 1: The role of parties and legal professionals in procedural delay The Pilot courts are invited to give their opinions on the role of the parties and their representatives, in particular, in the various phases of the judicial procedure · Workshop 2: New dashboard models (e.g. Slovak model) The pilot courts are invited to present the Network with the tables, graphs or statistics used for the day-to-day management of the court, as well as their case weighting systems. · Workshop 3: Improving the quality of the judge’s work through better knowledge-sharing and collaboration The pilot courts are invited to give their opinions on the resources and difficulties encountered in the area of judicial communication Workshop Synthesis: Each workshop will appoint a rapporteur to share the conclusions of the plenary discussions. |
[1] A dashboard is a set of tables and/or graphs (bar charts, pie charts, etc.) to monitor case flow, human resources allocation, etc.