Domestic courts’ decision prohibiting contact between former foster parents and their foster child corresponded to the child’s best interests, was taken within the margin of appreciation and was based on relevant and sufficient reasons: Jírová and Others v. the Czech Republic
Failure of domestic authorities to take necessary and timely steps to enforce the applicants’ contact rights with his daughter amounted to a violation of Article 8 ECHR: E.K. v. Latvia
Order, without proportionality assessment, for demolition of unlawfully erected building, the home of the applicant and her minor children amounted to a violation of article 8 ECHR: Simonova v. Bulgaria
Primary school’s response, including reasonable adjustments, to aggressive and disruptive behaviour of child diagnosed with hyperkinetic and scholastic-skills disorder did not amount to a violation of Article 14 of the Convention taken in conjunction with Article 2 of Protocol No. 1: T.H. v. Bulgaria
Refusal by German courts to allow transgender parent who gave birth to a child to be recorded as father did not violate Convention: O.H. and G.H. v. Germany (in French), press release
Refusal of German authorities to record a transgender parent as mother on birth certificate of child to whom she had not given birth did not violate Convention: A.H. and Others v. Germany (in French), press release
Reasoned decision enforcing return order of applicant’s child to the USA under the Hague Convention in compliance with Article 8 ECHR procedural requirements and with child’s best interests being primary consideration: X. v. the Czech Republic
Hungary must develop a policy to put a stop to segregation in education. The difference in treatment which the applicant was subjected to in his education and the lack of national adequate measures with a view to correcting the situation and avoiding the resultant discrimination amounted to a violation of Article 14 taken in conjunction with Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention: Szolcsán v. Hungary, press release
Restriction of remand prisoner’s family visits with wife and ten-year-old daughter during first nine months of detention based on unsubstantiated risk of interference with ongoing investigations amounted to a violation of Article 8 ECHR: Deltuva v. Lithuania
Domestic courts’ refusal to allow applicant and her child to move residence to Canada, in absence of father’s consent, was based on child’s best interests and in compliance with Article 8 ECHR: Simona Mihaela Dobre v. Romania
