Strasbourg, 27 June 2017
CEPEJ-GT-EVAL(2016)6rev3
EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR THE EFFICIENCY OF JUSTICE (CEPEJ)
Scheme for evaluating judicial systems
Key judicial indicators
|
|
Reference year: |
1. Inhabitants, GDP and average gross annual salary (complete the table)
Number of inhabitants |
|
Per capita GDP (gross domestic product) in euro |
|
Average gross annual salary in euro |
2. Total annual budget allocated to all courts (in euro)
3. Does this budget of the courts include the following items?
Please give for each item a specification of the amount concerned (if possible).
Yes |
Amount (in euro) |
|
Annual public budget allocated to (gross) salaries |
||
Annual public budget allocated to computerisation (equipment, investments, maintenance) |
||
Annual public budget allocated to justice expenses (expertise, interpretation, etc.) without legal aid. NB: this does not concern taxes and fees to be paid by the parties |
||
Annual public budget allocated to court buildings (maintenance, operating costs) |
||
Annual public budget allocated to investments in new (court) buildings |
|
|
Annual public budget allocated to training |
||
Other |
Please specify if these allocated budgets (questions 2 and 3) are:
approved budgets implemented budgets
Comment:
4. If you cannot answer question 2 because you cannot isolate the budget allocated to courts from the budget allocated to public prosecution services and/or legal aid, please fill in only the appropriate line in the table according to your system:
|
Approved budget (in euro) |
Implemented budget (in euro) |
Total annual public budget allocated to all courts and public prosecution services together |
|
|
Total annual public budget allocated to all courts and legal aid together |
|
|
Total annual public budget allocated to all courts, public prosecution services and legal aid together |
|
|
|
5. Annual number of cases brought to court for which legal aid has been granted and annual public budget allocated to legal aid (complete the table)
Number |
Amount |
|
Criminal cases |
|
|
Other than criminal cases |
|
|
Total of cases for which legal aid has been granted |
|
Please specify if the budget allocated to legal aid is:
approved budget implemented budget
Comment:
6. Does legal aid concern non-litigious cases or cases not brought to court (legal consultation, alternative dispute resolutions, etc.)?
Yes No
|
7. Number of courts considered as legal entities (administrative structures) and geographic locations.
First instance courts of general jurisdiction (legal entities) |
|
First instance specialised courts (legal entities) |
|
All the courts (geographic locations) (this includes first instance courts of general jurisdiction, first instance specialised courts, all second instance courts and courts of appeal and all supreme courts) |
|
8. Judges, non-judge staff and Rechtspfleger (complete the table)
Total number |
Male |
Female |
|
Professional judges (in full time equivalent and permanent posts) |
|
|
|
Professional judges sitting in courts on an occasional basis and paid accordingly |
|
|
|
Non-professional judges (including lay-judges) who are not remunerated but who can possibly receive a defrayal of costs |
|
|
|
Non-judge staff working in courts (in full time equivalent and permanent posts) |
|
|
|
Rechtspfleger (if applicable) |
|
|
9. Public prosecutors and non-prosecutor staff of the public prosecution services (complete the table in full time equivalent and permanent posts)
Total number |
Male |
Female |
|
Number of public prosecutors |
|
|
|
Number of staff (non-prosecutors) attached to public prosecution services |
|
|
|
10. Basic facilities (micro-computers, internet connection and e-mail) used for direct assistance to judges / prosecutors / court clerks
Yes No
If yes, please specify the following information:
Equipment rate |
Centralised or interoperable database |
Early warning signals (for active case management) |
Denomination(s) of the system(s) |
|
Database for all matters |
â—‹100% â—‹50-99% â—‹10-49%1-9% â—‹0% (NAP) â—‹NA |
Yes No |
Yes No |
|
If no, please fill in the questionnaire for the matter(s) concerned: |
||||
Civil and/or commercial |
â—‹100% â—‹50-99% â—‹10-49%1-9% â—‹0% (NAP) â—‹NA |
Yes No |
Yes No |
|
Criminal |
â—‹100% â—‹50-99% â—‹10-49%1-9% â—‹0% (NAP) â—‹NA |
Yes No |
Yes No |
|
Administrative |
â—‹100% â—‹50-99% â—‹10-49%1-9% â—‹0% (NAP) â—‹NA |
Yes No |
Yes No |
|
Other |
â—‹100% â—‹50-99% â—‹10-49%1-9% â—‹0% (NAP) â—‹NA |
Yes No |
Yes No |
Yes No
If yes, please specify the following information:
Equipment rate |
Data consolidated at national level |
Denomination(s) of the system(s) |
|
Unique statistical tool for all matters |
â—‹100% â—‹50-99% â—‹10-49%1-9% â—‹0% (NAP) â—‹NA |
Yes No |
|
If no, please fill in the questionnaire for the matter(s) concerned: |
|||
Civil and/or commercial |
â—‹100% â—‹50-99% â—‹10-49%1-9% â—‹0% (NAP) â—‹NA |
Yes No |
|
Criminal |
â—‹100% â—‹50-99% â—‹10-49%1-9% â—‹0% (NAP) â—‹NA |
Yes No |
|
Administrative |
â—‹100% â—‹50-99% â—‹10-49%1-9% â—‹0% (NAP) â—‹NA |
Yes No |
|
Other |
â—‹100% â—‹50-99% â—‹10-49%1-9% â—‹0% (NAP) â—‹NA |
Yes No |
|
13. Litigious civil cases and administrative law cases brought to courts (complete the table)
Litigious civil cases |
of which litigious divorce cases |
of which employment dismissals |
Administrative cases |
Backlog of cases for more than 2 years |
||
Total number (first instance) |
Pending cases by 1 January of the reference year |
|||||
Incoming cases |
||||||
Resolved cases (decisions on the merits) |
||||||
Pending cases by 31 December of reference year |
||||||
Average length (from the date the application for judicial review is lodged) of first instance proceedings |
||||||
Total number (second instance) |
Pending cases by 1 January of the reference year |
|||||
Incoming cases |
||||||
Resolved cases |
||||||
Pending cases by 31 December of the reference year |
||||||
Average length (from the date the application for judicial review is lodged) of second instance proceedings |
||||||
Total number (Supreme Court) |
Pending cases by 1 January of the reference year |
|||||
Incoming cases |
||||||
Resolved cases |
||||||
Pending cases by 31 December of the reference year |
||||||
Average length (from the date the application for judicial review is lodged) of third instance proceedings |
14. Number of cases received and processed by the public prosecutor (complete the table)
Total number of first instance criminal cases |
||
Received by the public prosecutor during the reference year |
||
Discontinued by the public prosecutor |
Total |
|
because the offender could not be identified |
||
due to lack of an established offence or specific legal situation |
||
for reasons of opportunity |
||
Concluded by a penalty, imposed or negotiated by the public prosecutor |
||
Charged by the public prosecutor before the courts |
15. Criminal cases in the courts(complete the table)
Criminal cases (total) |
of which robbery cases |
of which intentional homicides |
||
Total number (1st instance) |
Pending cases by 1 January of the reference year |
|||
Incoming cases |
||||
Resolved cases (judicial decisions) |
||||
Pending cases by 31 December of the reference year |
||||
Average length (from the date of official charging) of 1st instance proceedings (in days) |
|
16. Salaries of judges and prosecutors (at 31 December of the reference year):
Gross annual salary, in euro |
Net annual salary, in euro |
Gross annual salary, in local currency |
Net annual salary, in local currency |
|
First instance professional judge at the beginning of his/her career |
|
|
|
|
Judge of the Supreme Court or the Highest Appellate Court (please indicate the average salary of a judge at this level, and not the salary of the Court President) |
|
|
|
|
Public prosecutor at the beginning of his/her career |
|
|
|
|
Public prosecutor of the Supreme Court or the Highest Appellate Instance (please indicate the average salary of a public prosecutor at this level, and not the salary of the Attorney General). |
|
|
|
|
|
17. Total number of lawyers practising in your country:
|
18. Does the legal system provide for the following alternative dispute resolutions (ADR):
Judicial mediation
Mediation other than judicial mediation
Arbitration
Conciliation
Other ADR
If "other ADR", please specify:
|
19. Please describe the main legal and judicial reforms in your country which contribute to the improvement of the quality and efficiency of justice: