Karoussiotis v. Portugal, 1st February 2011: “International child abduction, in Portugal”

·         failure to act and negligence of the Portuguese authorities in the context of proceedings initiated to secure the return of the applicant’s child (Art. 8 ECHR) – [violation].

See also Ignaccolo-Zenide v. Romania, 25 January 2000; Sylvester v. Austria, 6 February 2003; Iglesias Gil and A. U. I. v. Spain, 29 April 2003; Maire v. Portugal, 26 June 2003; Sophia Gudrún Hansen v. Turkey, 23 September 2003; Monory v. Romania and Hungary, 5 April 2005; H.N. v. Poland, 13 September 2005; Eskinazi and Chelouche v. Turkey, 6 December 2005; Karadžić v. Croatia, 15 December 2005; Bianchi v. Switzerland, 22 June 2006; Bajrami v. Albania, 12 December 2006; Maumousseau and Washington v. France, 6 December 2007; P.P. v. Poland, 8 January 2008; Leschiutta and Fraccaro v. Belgium, 17 July 2008; Carlson v. Switzerland, 6 November 2008; Ancel v. Turkey, 17 February 2009; Stochlak v. Poland, 22 September 2009; Övüş v. Turkey, 13 October 2009; Tapia Gasca and D. v. Spain, 22 December 2009; Macready v. Czech Republic, 22 April 2010; Neulinger and Shuruk v. Switzerland [GC], 6 July 2010; Serghides v. Poland, 2 November 2010; Dore v. Portugal, 1^st February 2011.