Aytimur v. Turkey, 20 May 2010: “Minor accused and detained, in Turkey”.

·         lack of an effective procedure whereby the applicant could have challenged the lawfulness of his provisional detention (Art. 5 § 4 ECHR) – [violation].

·         impossibility for the applicant, who did not have an effective remedy enabling him to challenge the lawfulness of his provisional detention, to claim compensation (Art. 5 § 5 ECHR) – [violation].

See also Selçuk v. Turkey, 10 January 2006; Okkali v. Turkey, 17 October 2006; Nart v. Turkey, 6 May 2008; Salduz v. Turkey, 27 November 2008; Güveç v. Turkey, 20 January 2009; İpek and Others v. Turkey, 3 February 2009; Soykan v. Turkey, 21 April 2009; Alkes v. Turkey, 16 February 2010; Erhan Dinç v. Turkey, 20 May 2010.