Ministers' Deputies

Decisions

CM/Del/Dec(2002)819 (unclassified) 27 January 2003

Volume I – APPENDICES

————————————————

819th (DH) meeting, 3 and 5 December 2002

Appendices adopted

(Formal date of adoption: 17 December 2002)

————————————————

819th meeting (DH) – 3 and 5 December 2002

CONTENTS

APPENDICES                                                                                                                                  Pages

APPENDIX 3                  819th MEETING OF THE MINISTERS' DEPUTIES

                                      (Strasbourg, 3 and 5 December 2002, DH)

                                      ANNOTATED AGENDA AND ORDER OF BUSINESS (PUBLIC)........................... 4

APPENDIX 2                  827th MEETING OF THE MINISTERS' DEPUTIES

                                      (Strasbourg, 11-12 February 2003, DH)

                                      PRELIMINARY LIST OF ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION (PUBLIC)..................... 118

819th meeting (DH) – 3 and 5 December 2002

APPENDIX 3

819th METING OF THE MINISTERS’ DEPUTIES

(Strasbourg, 3 and 5 December 2002 – DH)

ANNOTATED AGENDA AND ORDER OF BUSINESS

Document made public in pursuance of the decision taken at the 749th meeting (DH) (17 April 2001) – item d.

CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION. 6

GENERAL QUESTIONS. 12

SECTION 1 - FINAL RESOLUTIONS. 13

SECTION 2 - NEW CASES. 18

SECTION 3 - JUST SATISFACTION. 34

SECTION 4 - CASES RAISING SPECIFIC QUESTION (INDIVIDUAL MEASURES, MEASURES NOT YET DEFINED OR SPECIAL PROBLEMS) 59

SECTION 5 - SUPERVISION OF GENERAL MEASURES ALREADY ANNOUNCED.. 95

SECTION 6 - CASES WAITING FOR THE PRESENTATION OF A DRAFT RESOLUTION. 107

c. PREPARATION OF THE NEXT DH MEETING (827th MEETING, 11-12 February 2003) 117

Additional documents

Addendum General Questions

Addendum 1 - Final Resolutions

Addendum 4 (volumes 1 and 2) – Cases raising special questions

Addendum 5 - Supervision of general measures already announced

Addendum Preparation of the next DH meeting (827th meeting, 11-12 February 2003)

CM/Inf(2002)47 and Addendum

INTRODUCTION

At the present Human Rights meeting, the Committee of Ministers, sitting at the level of the Ministers’ Deputies, will supervise the execution of some 3186 cases in accordance with Article 46, § 2, of the Convention for the protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Supervision is carried out in accordance with the Rules for the application of this Article adopted by the Deputies on 11 January 2001[1]. The Directorate General of Human Rights (Department for the execution of the judgments of the Court) and the Secretariat of the Committee of Ministers provide advice and assistance to the Deputies in the fulfilment of their functions under the Convention. Information and communications relating to the cases should be addressed to these departments.

Below follows a short comparative survey of the meeting (the information on the nature of the cases in the different sections is described after the table):

SECTION 1 – FINAL RESOLUTIONS

In the cases appearing under this heading the Deputies are invited to adopt draft resolutions putting an end to the supervision of execution carried out pursuant to Article 46§2 of the Convention (or former Articles 32[4] and 54 for cases decided before the entry into force of Protocol N° 11).

In these cases the Court (or the Committee) has either found a violation of the Convention or struck the case out of the list on the basis of undertakings made by the parties (for example in the case of friendly settlements – see Article 39 of the Convention and Rule 44 of the Rules of Court).

In all the cases, the Deputies have provisionally found, with the assistance of the Directorate General of Human Rights, that the required execution measures have been taken. The relevant information for each case has been summarised in a draft final resolution presented in Addendum 1. To facilitate examination, the cases are grouped as follows:

Sub-section 1.1. - Leading cases

In these leading cases the measures adopted aim at preventing new violations of the Convention  (legislative or regulatory measures, changes of case-law, mere publication in those states where the Convention and the Court’s judgments are given direct effect, administrative measures or other measures) and/or at redressing adequately the individual situation of the applicant (among the measures which may be relevant mention may be made of reopening of proceedings, striking out a conviction from criminal records, granting a residence permit, etc.)

Sub-section 1.2 – Cases concerning problems already solved

 This sub-section comprises cases which do not raise problems as regards the applicant’s individual situation, but which concern general problems which have already been solved in the context of similar earlier cases.

Sub-section 1.3 – Cases not involving general or individual measures

Contains cases which do not raise problems of a general or individual character. In these cases the mere dissemination of the judgment to the authorities directly concerned is considered sufficient.

Sub-section 1.4 – Friendly settlements and problems of a general character

This new sub-section groups friendly settlements relating to complaints concerning general problems already under examination by the Deputies in the context of other leading cases in which violations have been established.

No discussion of cases in Section 1 is envisaged since the examination of the different execution questions has already been carried out by the Deputies in the course of earlier meetings.

SECTION 2 – NEW CASES

Under this heading, the Deputies are called upon to conduct a first examination of the execution of the new final judgments delivered by the Court (Article 44 §§ 1 and 2 of the Convention) finding violations of the Convention. The Deputies also supervise the execution of judgments striking cases out of the Court’s list (friendly settlements, non-pursuit of the application, or a solution to the dispute) and which contain specific undertakings (Article 39 of the Convention and Article 44 of the Rules of Court).

The examination of new cases is in general resumed after the expiry of the 3-month time-limit normally imparted by the Court for the payment of the just satisfaction.

 

In those cases where all execution measures have already been taken before this first examination, a draft final resolution summarising the relevant information could be submitted for adoption. Such draft resolutions appear in Addendum 2.

Discussion is envisaged mainly for cases which raise questions of individual measures or new general measures.

Dissemination of the judgments to all the authorities involved has been requested in all these cases.

SECTION 3 – JUST SATISFACTION

In these cases the Deputies are called upon to supervise the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court and, where required, of any default interest owed.

 

The section also presents the last cases in which the Deputies, in accordance with former Article 32§2 of the Convention, are called upon to decide on the question of just satisfaction on the basis of proposals submitted by the former European Commission of Human Rights or by the Committee of Special Advisors set up by Resolutions DH(99)681 and (2000)138 (see also decision 692/4.4 from December 1999).

                   Sub-section 3.1 – control of payment:

3.1.a: Supervisionof the payment of the capital sum of the just satisfaction as well as, where due, of default interest, in cases where the deadline for payment expired less than 6 months ago.

Delegations are invited to submit written confirmation of payment to the Directorate General of Human Rights (Service for the execution of the judgments).

 

3.1.b: Supervisionof the payment of the capital sum of the just satisfaction in cases where the deadline for payment expired more than 6 months ago.

3.1.c: Examination of special payment problems (for example the disappearance of the applicant, disputes regarding the exact amount paid as a result of exchange rate problems or administrative fees).

The further examination of the cases in sub-sections 3.1 a - c depends on the information received.

Sub-section 3.2 – Decisions on just satisfaction

The Deputies may be are called upon to take a decision on just satisfaction pursuant to former Article 32. The details of the cases are found either in a table presented under this sub-section, or, if the case is complex, in Addendum 3 II.

The examination of such cases will be resumed after the expiry of the 3 months time-limit set for payment.

SECTION 4 – CASES RAISING SPECIAL QUESTIONS

(individual measures, measures not yet defined or special problems) 

The cases which appear under this heading require special attention to the extent that they either raise problems regarding the individual situation of the applicant, or concern problems in respect of which the necessary execution measures have not yet been defined, or raise other special problems (for example on account of the magnitude of the problems raised or delays in the adoption of the necessary execution measures).

 

Sub-section 4.1 – Supervision of individual measures only

This sub-section groups together cases in which the Deputies will exclusively examine the measures taken or to be taken in order to put an end to the violation found and/or remedy its consequences as far as the applicant’s individual situation is concerned – where the just satisfaction awarded by the Court has not done so.

Sub-section 4.2 - Individual measures and/or general problems

This heading presents both cases involving payment problems combined with general problems and cases in which measures have not yet been defined. For supervision of individual measures, see sub-section 4.1 above; for supervision of payment, subsection 3.1.c and for general measures, section 5 below.

 

Sub-section 4.3 – Special problems

This title groups together complex cases raising special problems.

Supplementary information relating to the cases under this heading may, where necessary, be found in Addendum 4.

As long as individual measures are outstanding cases are examined at each Human Rights meeting, unless the Deputies decide otherwise. Examination of other issues is decided upon on a case-by-case basis.

SECTION 5 – SUPERVISION OF GENERAL MEASURES ALREADY ANNOUNCED

In these cases the Deputies are called upon to supervise the progress made in adopting measures of a general character defined at the national level and to ensure that these measures are apt to prevent new violations similar to those found by the Court. Cases are grouped together according to the nature of the main reforms envisaged.

In complex cases which require the adoption of several kinds of measures, cases are placed in the sub-section which corresponds to the main measures remaining to be adopted. A case may thus, for example, pass from sub-section 5.1 to sub-section 5.4 if the legislative changes required are rapidly adopted, whereas the implementation of the practical measures required turn out to take more time.

Sub-section 5.1 – Legislative and/or regulatory changes

In the cases in this group, the Deputies are mainly waiting for changes of legislation or of government regulations aiming at preventing new similar violations. Delegations of respondent States will thus furnish information about the content of draft legislation or regulations and on the procedure for their adoption.

Sub-section 5.2 – Changes of courts’ case-law or of administrative practice

This heading presents cases in which the Deputies are waiting for evidence (in the form of copies of judgments or decisions, statistics, etc.) of a change of the domestic courts’ case-law or of administrative practice, where such a change cannot, for one reason or another, be presumed solely on the basis of the publication or dissemination of the judgment (cf. the next sub-section).

 

Sub-section 5.3 – Publication / dissemination

This title encompasses in particular cases in which a change of court case-law or of administrative practice may be presumed, on the basis of evidence of the direct effect accorded to the Court’s judgments in general, as a result of simply publishing or disseminating the judgment in the case at issue, where necessary in translation into the national language. It may also concern other types of cases presenting a broader interest, such as those which imply important indications regarding the scope of the rights guaranteed by the Convention. In all these cases, the Deputies are normally waiting for details regarding the publication or dissemination carried out.

The Deputies are invited to present all relevant information in writing to the Directorate General of Human Rights (Service for the execution of the judgments of the Court).

Sub-section 5.4 – Other measures

This sub-section includes cases which primarily imply other types of general measures, for example practical measures such as the construction of prison facilities, the recruitment of judges, police training, etc.

Where necessary, supplementary information with respect to the cases in this section will be presented in Addendum 5.

Examination of these cases is normally resumed within 6 months’ time.

SECTION 6 – CASES WAITING FOR THE PRESENTATION OF A DRAFT RESOLUTION 

In these cases, the draft resolutions (prepared in collaboration with the Delegation concerned in cases raising questions of individual measures or new problems of a general character) putting and end to the examination of the case are not yet available at the time of issuing the annotated agenda and order of business.

If available in time for the meeting, drafts could be distributed separately.

Examination is in principle be resumed at the next Human Rights meeting.

GENERAL QUESTIONS

a.                Adoption of the Annotated Agenda and Order of Business

Action

The Deputies are invited to adopt the present annotated agenda and order of business.

b.                State of ratification by member States of the European Agreement relating to persons participating in proceedings of the European Court of Human Rights, the Sixth Protocol to the General Agreement on privileges and immunities of the Council of Europe and Protocols No. 12 and No. 13 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms

Action

The Deputies are invited to provide information on the state of signature and ratification of these four texts. Tables showing the current state of signature and ratification appear in Addendum General Questions.

c.                Preparation of the next meeting (827th (11-12 February 2003)) see page 117

d.                Procedure for supervising the adoption of individual measures, particularly in cases where national law does not provide a time-limit within which such measures have to be requested[5]

Action

The Deputies are invited to resume the examination of this point.

e.                Application of default interest in the supervision of the execution of the terms of friendly settlements

                   Addendum General Questions

Action

The Deputies are invited to resume consideration of this item, in the light of the comments they were invited to transmit to the Secretariat (see Addendum General Questions).

SECTION 1 - FINAL RESOLUTIONS

(NO DEBATE ENVISAGED)

(Addendum 1)

Action

The Deputies are invited to adopt the resolutions putting and end to the examination of the following cases as they appear in Addendum 1.

                   SUB-SECTION 1.1 – LEADING CASES

- 2 cases against Italy

H54-1           14967          Guerra and 39 others, judgment of 19/02/98

H32-2           14667          Cantafio

                   SUB-SECTION 1.2 – CASES CONCERNING PROBLEMS ALREADY SOLVED

                   No new case

                   SUB-SECTION 1.3 – CASES NOT INVOLVING GENERAL OR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES

- 1 case against France

H46-3           38437          Delgado, judgment of 14/11/00, final on 04/04/01

- 2 cases against Germany

H46-4           38073          H.T., judgment of 11/10/01, final on 11/01/02

H46-5           45181          Volkwein, judgment of 04/04/2002, final on 04/07/2002

- 1 case against Portugal

H46-6           43658          Sousa Miranda, judgment of 30/10/01, final on 30/01/02

                   SUB-SECTION 1.4 – FRIENDLY SETTLEMENTS AND PROBLEMS OF A GENERAL CHARACTER

- 1 case against Croatia

H46-2837     45435          Radoš and others (Gojko Mikecin) [6], judgment of 04/07/2002 - Friendly settlement

- 1 case against France

H46-2866     49352          Guelfucci, judgment of 30/10/01 – Friendly settlement

- 1 case against Germany

H46-7           51342          Kalantari, judgment of 11/10/01, final on 11/01/02 – Striking out

- 2 cases against Greece

H46-2903     40428          Zohiou, judgment of 29/03/01, final on 29/03/01

H46-2931     52538          Examiliotis, judgment of 18/04/02 - Friendly settlement

- 1 case against Italy

H46-2998     46535          Caruso Alfredo, judgment of 05/10/00

- 3 cases against Turkey

H46-3164     33369          Can, judgment of 05/12/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-3166     34591          Özçetin, judgment of 05/12/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-3167     33645          Polat Yuksel, judgment of 05/12/00 - Friendly settlement

- 1 case against the United Kingdom

H46-9           38550          Sawden, judgment of 12/03/02 – Friendly settlement

SECTION 2 - NEW CASES

Action

The Deputies are invited to procede to the first examination, under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the ECHR, of the following new judgments, delivered by the European Court of Human Rights (for further information, see the text of the judgments, http://www.echr.coe.int).

The Deputies are invited to resume consideration of these cases after expiry of the time-limit set for payment or according to the specificity of the cases.

PAYMENT OF JUST SATISFACTION

In all the new cases in which States should pay just satisfaction as ordered by the Court or as agreed in a friendly settlement, the authorities of the respondent State are invited to provide the Secretariat, in writing, with confirmations of payment.

INDIVIDUAL AND/OR GENERAL MEASURES

As regards any other execution measures which may be called for in the light of the conclusions of the Court, the authorities of the respondent State are invited, on a preliminary basis, to provide the Secretariat, in writing, with information on the measures mentioned after each case. The possible necessity to take other measures than those mentioned could nevertheless be addressed at the meeting.

Dissemination of the judgments to all the authorities involved has been requested in all cases and delegations are invited to provide the written confirmation of this dissemination.

In all these cases, just satisfaction or compensation agreed under a friendly settlement has been awarded to the applicants except in the following cases: Amrollahi, Motais de Narbonne (reserved in part), P.S., Koskinas, Katsaros (reserved), Carbone Biagio, Falcone Nicolò and Armstrong.

Section 2

- 2 cases against Austria

H46-10         38237          Sailer, judgment of 06/06/2002, final on 06/09/2002

H46-11         38275          W.F., judgment of 30/05/2002, final on 30/08/2002

These cases concern a violation of the applicants’ right not to be tried or punished twice. The applicants, having been involved in traffic accidents, were first convicted in 1995 of driving under the influence of alcohol by the administrative authorities under the Road Traffic Act. They were then convicted again in respect of the same facts by the criminal the courts in 1996 and 1997 under the Penal Code (violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7) .

These cases present similarities to Gradinger against Austria (judgment of 23/10/1995) which was closed by a final resolution (DH (97) 501) following the adoption of general measures by the Austrian authorities.

- 2 cases against Bulgaria

H46-12         38361          Anguelova, judgment of 13/06/2002, final on 13/09/2002

The case concerns the death of the applicant’s son, aged 17, as a result of injuries inflicted on him in January 1966 while in police custody on charges of theft (violations of Articles 2 and 3), the failure by the police to provide timely medical care during his detention (violation of Article 2) and the lack of effective investigation of his death by the Bulgarian authorities (violation of Articles 2 and 13). Finally, the European Court found that the detention of the applicant’s son had been unlawful in that it was not based on a written order as required by domestic law and was not properly recorded in the police custody register (violation of Article 5§1).

The present case presents similarities to the Velikova case (judgment of 18/05/00) which is pending before the Committee of Ministers for supervision of general measures (834th meeting, (April 2003), Section 4.2).

Other possible individual and/or general measures: to be discussed at the meeting.

H46-13         50963          Al-Nashif and others, judgment of 20/06/2002, final on 20/09/2002

The case concerns the deportation of the first applicant, a stateless person, to Syria on 4 July 1999. The European Court considered that there had been a violation of the applicants’ right to family life inasmuch as the applicable legal provisions did not give sufficient guarantees against arbitrariness, the first applicant having been deported on the basis of considerations of national security exclusively within the discretionary power of the Minister of the Interior (violation of Article 8). The Court further found that the applicants had not had access to an effective remedy in this respect (violation of Article 13). The case finally concerns the fact that the first applicant had, under the applicable law, been given no opportunity to challenge the lawfulness of his detention while awaiting deportation (violation of Article 5§4).

Possible individual and/or general measures: to be discussed at the meeting.

- 1 case against Cyprus

H46-14         53594          Alithia Publishing Company, judgment of 11/07/2002, final on 11/10/2002

This case concerns the excessive length of certain civil proceedings (violation of Article 6§1). The period to be taken into consideration started on 1 January 1989 (the date upon which Cyprus recognised the right of individual application) and finished on 22 June 1999 (ten years, five months and twenty days).

Section 2

- 2 cases against Croatia

H46-15         53176          Mikulić, judgment of 07/02/2002, final on 04/09/2002[7]

The case concerns first, the excessive lengtht of proceedings to establish paternity brought by the applicant in January 1997 and the absence of an effective remedy in this respect. The proceedings had lasted 4 years and 2 months when the European Court rendered its judgment and was still pending before the Court of Appeal (violations of Article 6§1 and 13). Secondly, the case concerns the violation of the applicant’s right to her private life in that the domestic courts were unable to pronounce on her action to establish paternity. The European Court found that the domestic courts had not been able to oblige the presumed father to submit to DNA testing and that there was no other alternative procedural means of deciding the matter of paternity swiftly. It therefore concluded that the applicable procedure did not establish a just balance between the applicant’s right to put an end quickly to her uncertainty about her personal identity and her presumed father’s right not to submit to DNA testing (violation of Article 8). 

Possible individual and/or general measures: The Croatian authorities have indicated that the domestic proceedings ended by a final judgment rendered on 26/02/02. The European Court’s judgment has already been translated and published on the Government Web site of the (http://www.vlada.hr/dokumenti.html). Other measures will be discussed at the meeting.

H46-16         48771          Delić, judgment of 27/06/2002, final on 27/09/2002

The case concerns the excessive length of 9 different sets of civil proceedings for recovery of debts ( eight of which are still pending at first instance or appeal) and the absence of an effective remedy in respect of the length of these proceedings (violations of Articles 6§1 and 13).

It presents similarities with the Horvat case (judgment of 26/07/2001), which is to be examined in section 4.2 of this annotated agenda and order of business.

Possible individual and/or general measures: accelerating domestic proceedings; the European Court’s judgments have already been translated and published on the official web site of the Government www.vlada.hr/dokumenti.html.

- 1 case against Denmark

H46-17         56811          Amrollahi, judgment of 11/07/2002, final on 11/10/2002

The case concerns an infringement of the applicant’s right to respect for his family life. The applicant, an Iranian national, moved legally to Denmark in 1989 and married a Danish national. They have three children, all of Danish nationality, one of which is the issue of an earlier marriage of the applicant’s wife. In 1997, the applicant was convicted of drug trafficking and sentenced to three years’ imprisonment followed by permanent expulsion from Denmark. The European Court considered that, given the applicant’s significant family ties with Denmark and the fact that he had had no contact with his Iranian family since 1987, and taking into account that it was a practical impossibility for the applicant and his family to set up home elsewhere than in Denmark, the applicant’s expulsion would have the effect of separating the family, and would thus be disproportionate to the aims pursued (violation of Article 8 if the decision to expel the applicant were implemented).

Possible individual and/or general measures: publication of the judgment; other measures to be discussed at the meeting.

Section 2

- 1 case against Finland

H46-18         30013          Türkiye iş Bankasi, judgment of 18/06/2002, final on 18/09/2002

The case concerns the excessive length of certain civil proceedings (violation of Article 6§1). The period to be taken into consideration by the Court began on 10/05/90 - when the Convention entered into force with respect to Finland - to end on 17/05/95 (5 years and 7 days).

Possible individual and/or general measures: Publication of the judgment of the European Court.

- 12 cases against France

H46-19         51279          Colombani and others, judgment of 25/06/2002, final on 25/09/2002

The case concerns the conviction in 1998 of the daily newspaper Le Monde, its director and a journalist for having published an article about an official report prepared at the request of the Commission of the European Communities on drug production and trafficking in Morocco which implicated the King of Morroco’s entourage. The French courts found the applicants guilty of insulting a foreign Head of State, under Section 36 of the Law of 29/07/1881 on the Freedom of the Press, and condemned the applicants to pay a fine and publish the details of the conviction. Unlike the provisions covering defamation in ordinary law, the offence covered by Section 36 of this law does not permit “exceptio veritatis” defence. The Court considered therefore that, because of the special nature of the protection afforded by this provision, the existence of a misdemeanour of insulting foreign heads of state was liable to infringe freedom of expression without corresponding to a “pressing social need” sufficient to justify such a restriction (violation of Article 10).

Possible individual and/or general measures: publication; wide dissemination, with an information note, to criminal courts and the Court of Cassation; other measure(s) to be discussed at the meeting.

H46-20         48161          Motais de Narbonne, judgment of 02/07/2002, final on 02/10/2002

The case concerns the compulsory purchase, in December 1982, of property belonging to the applicants, on grounds of public utility, in order to constitute land reserves for social housing.  In 1989, since no works had been carried out, the applicants invoked Article L.12-6 of the Compulsory Purchase Code, which provides that, if an expropriated property is not put to its declared use within a time-limit of five years, the former owners may apply for its restitution.  They applied for restitution of the property and subsequently, instead, for the payment of its up-to-date value, less the compulsory purchase compensation they had already received.  The Court of Appeal found against the applicants in 1996.  The European Court considered that the fact of keeping the property unused for 19 years had resulted in the accumulation of an appreciable capital gain of which the applicants had been unduly deprived since the fact of keeping the property in reserve was not based on any reason grounded in public utility.  It therefore considered that the applicants had been subjected to an excessive burden as a result of the compulsory purchase (violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1).

Possible individual and/or general measures: publication of the European Court’s judgment; other measures to be discussed at the meeting.

H46-21         53613          Goth, judgment of 16/05/2002, final on 16/08/2002

The case concerns the violation of the applicant’s right of access to a court, in that the Cour de cassation found that his appeal on a point of law had lapsed, pursuant to Article 583 of the Code of Criminal Procedure which was applicable at the time, because he had not surrendered to custody nor obtained dispensation from the obligation to do so. The European Court considered that making the admissibility of an appeal to the Cour de Cassation conditional on the appellant’s surrendering to custody undermined the very essence of his right of access to the juge de Cassation and thus his right to a fair trial (violation of article 6§1).

Section 2

This case is similar to the Khalfaoui case, which is in Section 6 as a result of measures taken, in particular the abrogation of Article 583 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Possible individual measure: possible re-opening of the appeal on the basis of Articles 626-1 to 626-7 of the Code of Criminal Procedure introduced by Law No. 2000-516 of 15 June 2000.

H46-22         38396          Karatas and Sari, judgment of 16/05/2002, final on 16/08/2002

The case concerns the violation of the applicants’ right to a fair trial. By a default judgment of January 1997, a criminal court convicted the applicants, who had absconded, without allowing their lawyers to defend them. The European Court considered that the tribunal should have given the attending lawyers the opportunity to defend their clients’ case (violation Article 6§3c)).

Possible individual measure: on the basis of Articles 489 and 492 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the applicants could apply to have the judgment given by default set aside: the verdict would necessarily be quashed.

H46-23         41376          D.M., judgment of 27/06/2002, final on 27/09/2002

H46-24         43125          Delbec Annick No. 3, judgment of 18/06/2002, final on 18/09/2002[8]

H46-25         33395          L.R., judgment of 27/06/2002, final on 27/09/2002

The cases concern the length of time taken by civil courts (tribunaux de grande instance) to decide on urgent applications for immediate release from psychiatric hospital. These applications, introduced by the applicants between 1996 and 1998 lasted respectively one year and 20 days (the applicant having already been released after 3 months), slightly more than three months (the applicant having already been released after 1 month) and a little over six months (the applicant having already been released after 24 days) (violations of Article 5§4).

Possible general measure: dissemination of the European Court’s judgments to the presidents of tribunaux de grande instance.

H46-26         33424          Nouhaud and others, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002

The case concerns the excessive length of civil proceedings brought in conjunction with proceedings before administrative courts: a total of almost ten years, including three years and nine months before the Conseil d’Etat (violation of article 6 § 1 in respect of the first two applicants). The case also concerns the absence of an effective remedy in this respect (violation of article 13 in respect of the first two applicants). In this respect the Court found that it was not until after 20/09/2001 (and thus after the facts of the present case) that appeal for compensation based on Article L 781-1 of the Code of Judicial Organisation had acquired sufficient legal certainty to constitute a remedy for an alleged violation of the right to have a case judged within a reasonable time under the terms of Article 6§1(see the Court’s decisions in the cases of Giummara and others (12/06/2001) and Mifsud (11/09/2002).

H46-27         51179          Solana, judgment of 19/03/02, final on 04/09/2002[9]

This case concerns the excessive length of two sets of proceedings concerning civil rights and obligations before administrative courts (violation of Article 6§1). One set of proceedings, which began on 24/04/1991 and was still pending before the Bordeaux Administrative Court of Appeal when the European Court rendered its judgment, had so far lasted 10 years and 9 months. The other, which began on 30/11/1989 and ended on 29/06/1999, had lasted almost 9 years and 7months.

Possible individual measure: Accelerate the proceedings pending before the Bordeaux Administrative Court of Appeal.

Section 2

H46-28         51575          Baillard, judgment of 26/03/2002, final on 04/09/2002[10]

This case concerns the excessive length of certain proceedings concerning civil rights and obligations before administrative courts and the Conseil d’Etat. The proceedings, which began on 13/08/1991 and ended on 08/02/1998, lasted more than 7 years, five months of which 6 years and 5 months were before the Conseil d’Etat (violation of Article 6§1)

The case presents similarities to the Caillot case and other cases related to length of proceedings before the Conseil d’Etat (see sub-section 4.2 of this annotated agenda and order of business).

H46-29         44081          Perhirin and 29 others, judgment of 14/05/2002, final on 04/09/2002[11]

The case concerns the excessive length of two series of proceedings concerning civil rights and obligations before administrative courts and the Conseil d’Etat. Given that the various proceedings began at different dates, the durations found by the European Court vary between 9 years, 4 months and over 6 years, 2 months for one series and between 5 years, 11 moths and nearly 4 years for the second (violation of Article 6§1).

This case presents similarities with that of Caillot and other cases of excessive length of proceedings before the Conseil d’Etat (see Section 4.2 of this annotated agenda and order of business).

*H46-30        45172          Fentati, judgment of 22/10/2002 - Friendly settlement

The case concerns the length of certain proceedings concerning civil rights and obligations before labour courts (complaint under Article 6§1).

- 1 case against Germany

H46-31         33900          P.S., judgment of 20/12/2001, final on 04/09/2002[12]

This case concerns the violation of the applicant’s right to a fair trial in that he was unable to question or to have questioned the principal prosecution witness. The applicant was convicted on 10 January 1994 of a sexual offence against a child and sentenced to seven months’ imprisonment suspended (violation of Article 6§3d taken in conjunction with Article 6§1).

Possible individual and/or general measures: publication of the judgment of the European Court; other measures to be discussed at the meeting.

- 3 cases against Greece

H46-32         47760          Koskinas, judgment of 20/06/2002, final on 20/09/2002

The case concerns a violation of the applicant’s right of access to a court in that in 1996, the domestic courts rejected his action challenging his dismissal by the airline Olympic Airways (of which the state is the sole shareholder) on the grounds that, pursuant to chapter 10 §§ 5 and 8 of the company’s employment regulations, they had no competence to examine the veracity of accusations brought against the applicant justifying his dismissal. The European Court found that he had therefore been unable to challenge these accusations (violation of Article 6§1).

Individual measures: The Directorate General of Human Rights received a letter (dated 10/11/2002) from the applicant’s lawyer, informing it that the applicant had asked for the re-examination of his case by Olympic Airways and his re-employment in the post and grade he had before his dismissal. He considers that the re-examination of his case is the only means whereby Greece may comply with the Court’s judgment. He notes however that Greek law does not provide any possibility of reopening civil judicial proceedings. This letter was communicated to the Delegation of Greece whose response is awaited.

Section 2

Possible general measures: Publication and wide dissemination of the European Court’s judgment to civil courts; other measures to be discussed at the meeting.

H46-33         51473          Katsaros, judgment of 06/06/2002, final on 06/09/2002

The case concerns the violation of the applicant’s right of access to a court in that the authorities failed to comply within a reasonable time with judicial decisions revoking ipso jure an expropriation (judgment of the Court of Appeal of 1993) and inviting the administration to lift the restriction on the applicant’s property rights (judgment of the Council of State of 1999) (violation of Article 6§1). The case also concerns an illegal interference with the applicant’s property rights in that, despite the order revoking the expropriation and the decision modifying the alignment plan, finally carried out in 2001, the State deprived the applicant of the peaceful possession of his property by prohibiting him from using it (violation of Article 1 of Protocol n°1).

This case presents certain similarities with the Pialopoulos case (see CM/Del/OJ/OT(2002)803, 4.2) and the Hornsby case (judgment of 19/03/1997) closure of which is proposed following a number of general measures already adopted.

Possible individual and/or general measures: Publication and wide dissemination of the judgment to the competent administrative authorities, accompanied by a circular drawing their attention to the execution of the judicial decisions.

H46-34         55611          Xenopoulos, judgment of 28/03/2002, final on 04/09/2002[13]

The case concerns the excessive length of two sets of proceedings concerning civil rights and obligations before the Council of State (social insurance rights). These proceedings ended in 1999. The first lasted 12 years and 5 months and the second 11 years and 8 months (violation of Article 6§1).

This case presents similarities with those of Pafitis (judgment of 26/02/98), Varipati (judgment of 26/10/99), etc., closure of which is proposed following a number of general measures already adopted.

General measures: The judgment of the European Court has been published on the official internet site of the State Legal Council (www.nsk.gr).

- 2 cases against Hungary

                   - Cases of length of civil proceedings

H46-35         42373          Bódine Bencze, judgment of 01/10/2002 – Striking out following a friendly

                                      settlement

H46-36         43352          Kósa, judgment of 01/10/2002 - Striking out following a friendly settlement

These cases concern the length of certain civil proceedings (complaints under Article 6§1).

- 31 cases against Italy

                   - 7 Cases concerning the failure to enforce judicial eviction orders against tenants

H46-37         28724          Capitanio, judgment of 11/07/2002, final on 11/10/2002

The case concerns the prolonged impossibility for the applicant, from 1987 to 1996, to obtain the assistance of the police in order to implement a judicial decision ordering his tenant’s eviction, owing to the implementation of legislation providing for the suspension or staggering of evictions. As in the case of Immobiliare Saffi, judgment of 28/07/99 (see section 4.2 of this document), the Court considered that such a delay in implementing a final judicial decision had deprived the applicant of his right of access to a tribunal (violation of Article 6).

Section 2

*H46-38        46079          Biffoni, judgment of 24/10/2001 - Friendly settlement

*H46-39        41624          Calvagno, judgment of 03/10/2002 - Friendly settlement

*H46-40        31928          F. and F., judgment of 24/10/2001 - Friendly settlement

*H46-41        39690          Gianotti Ricardo, judgment of 03/10/2002 - Friendly settlement

*H46-42        43986          Pugliese Rosalba, judgment of 03/10/2002 - Friendly settlement

*H46-43        47895          Sartorelli, judgment of 24/10/2001 - Friendly settlement

These cases concern the prolonged impossibility for the applicants to obtain the assistance of the police in order to implement judicial decisions ordering their tenants’ eviction, owing to the implementation of legislation providing for the suspension or staggering of evictions (complaints under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 and Article 6).

These cases are similar to the case of Immobiliare Saffi, judgment of 28/07/99, under Section 4.2 of this document.

                   23 Italian cases of excessive length of judicial proceedings

                   (see Section 4.3, CM/Inf(2002)47) & Addendum 4, volume 1

a) 2 cases (see table a below) concerning the excessive length of proceedings before civil courts (violations of Article 6§1).

These cases are similar to among others, the Ceteroni case, judgment of 15/11/96.

b) 9 cases (see table b below) concerning the excessive length of proceedings concerning civil rights & obligations before administrative courts (violations of Article 6§1).

All these cases are similar among others, the Abenavoli case, judgment of 2/09/97.

c) 12 cases (see table c below) concerning the excessive length of proceedings before the criminal courts (violations of Article 6§1).

All these cases are similar among others, the Ledonne I case, judgment of 12/05/98, final on 12/08/99. In the case of Nuvoli, the Court also found, as in the case of Selva (judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02) that no effective remedy was available to the applicant under domestic law to complain about the excessive length of proceedings (violation of Article 13). The “Pinto” Act, No. 89 of 2001, introducing such a possibility is not applicable to this case.

General measures (concerning all these 23 cases): The question of general measures required and under way was in particular dealt with in Interim Resolutions DH(97)336, DH(99)436, DH(99)437 & DH(2000)135. In the last-named Resolution, the Deputies decided among other things “to resume its consideration of the progress made, at least at yearly intervals, on the basis of a comprehensive report to be presented each year by the Italian authorities.” At the end of the examination of the first report presented by the Italian authorities (issued under the reference CM/Inf(2001)37), the Committee of Ministers took note of the progress made as well as of a certain number of pending issues in respect of which it was not possible, at that stage, to draw global & final conclusions. As the information concerning civil, labour and administrative justice seemed to be relatively encouraging, the Committee decided to resume consideration of these issues in December 2002, on the basis of the new annual report to be provided by the Italian authorities in October 2002 (see press releases of 3/10/01 & 21/02/02). As regards criminal justice, the Committee continued its examination in June and July 2002. Having found that the available information did not show any significant improvement in the effectiveness of criminal courts, the Committee invited the Italian authorities to provide the information requested, including in particular comparable and updated statistical data, at the latest in October 2002, before the continuation of the examination in December 2002 (see press release of 10/07/02), which will take place under Section 4.3 of this meeting. In view of this examination, the Italian authorities have submitted a new annual report (CM/Inf(2002)47). See also Section 4.3 of this document and Addendum 4, volume 1.

Individual measures (concerning all these 23 cases): the Italian authorities are invited to provide information on the cases indicated as still pending at domestic level at the time the violation was found by the European Court, and to adopt appropriate measures in order to speed up these proceedings.

Section 2

Table a – civil proceedings

Item	Application	Case	Length of proceedings	Pending cases
H46-44	56087	L.B., judgment of 12/02/2002, final on 04/09/2002[14]	12 years & 10 months	Yes
H46-45	51674	V.I., judgment of 11/12/2001, final on 04/09/2002[15]	15 years & 5 months	Yes

Table b – administrative proceedings

Item	Application	Case	Length of proceedings	Pending cases
H46-46	44341	Cannone, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002	11 years & 2 months	No
H46-47	44347	Carapella and others, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002	8 years & 1 month	No
H46-48	44350	Cecere Domenico, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002	11 years & 2 months	No
H46-49	44337	Delli Paoli, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002	8 years & 8 months	No
H46-50	44349	Fragnito, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002	8 years & 1 month	No
H46-51	44340	Gaudenzi, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002	11 years & 2 months	No
H46-52	38594	Mereu and S. Maria Navarrese, judgment of 13/06/2002, final on 13/09/2002	15 years & 10 months	Yes
H46-53	44348	Nazzaro and others, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002	16 years & 11 months	No
H46-54	44351	Pace and others, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002	10 years & 10 months	No

Table c – criminal proceedings

Item	Application	Case	Length of proceedings	Pending cases
H46-55	38576	Barattelli Carlo, judgment of 04/07/2002, final on 04/10/2002	9 years & 2 months	No
H46-56	41863	Boldrin Stefano, judgment of 04/07/2002, final on 04/10/2002	7 years & 8 months	No
H46-57	42600	Carbone Biagio, judgment of 04/07/2002, final on 04/10/2002	13 years & 9 months	No
H46-58	37249	Casadei Roberto, judgment of 04/07/2002, final on 04/10/2002	12 years & 9 months	No
H46-59	35991	Del Federico Alberto, judgment of 04/07/2002, final on 04/10/2002	11 years & 1 month	No
H46-60	42619	Di Vuono Bernardo, judgment of 04/07/2002, final on 04/10/2002	6 years & 1 month	No
H46-61	37263	Falcone Nicolò, judgment of 04/07/2002, final on 04/10/2002	8 years & 10 months	Yes
H46-62	44173	Mucciacciaro Raffaele, judgment of 04/07/2002, final on 04/10/2002	6 years & 7 months	No
H46-63	42287	Pascazi Domenico, judgment of 04/07/2002, final on 04/10/2002	5 years & 5 months	No
H46-64	43915	Rocci Luigi, judgment of 04/07/2002, final on 04/10/2002	10 years & 2 months	No
H46-65	42291+	Tumbarello and Titone, judgment of 04/07/2002, final on 04/10/2002	6 years & 2 months	No
H46-66	41424	Nuvoli, judgment of 16/05/2002, final on 16/08/2002	5 years & 10 months	No

Section 2

*H46-67        36732          Pisano, judgment of 24/10/2002 – Striking-out - Grand Chamber

The case concerns the applicant’s complaint concerning the fairness of certain criminal proceedings.

In 2001 the applicant was re-tried and acquitted, after the European Court had decided that his application was admissible. The Court accordingly decided to strike the case out of its list under Article 37(b) of the Convention, considering that the matter had been resolved as the applicant had been acquitted and could seek compensation under domestic law for the unfairness of his conviction. The Court furthermore  awarded the applicant a sum for costs and expenses under Rule 44§4 of the Rules of Court.

- 2 cases against the Netherlands

H46-68         34462          Wessels-Bergervoet, judgment of 04/06/2002, final on 04/09/2002 and of

                                      12/11/2002 (Article 41) – Friendly settlement

The case concerns a decision in 1989 to grant the applicant an old age pension under the General Old Age Pension Act (Algemene Ouderdomswet). Her pension was however reduced as her entitlement to pension up to 1985 was linked to her husband’s which had been reduced by 38% as he had not been fully insured under this Act, having worked and been insured abroad for 19 years. The similar reduction of the applicant’s pension was eventually upheld by the Supreme Court (Hoge Raad) in 1996, despite the fact that this kind of reduction did not apply to a man married to a woman who had worked abroad. Since 1 April 1985, married women have been entitled in their own right to a pension under the above mentioned Act, but the new law preserved the difference in treatment as regards the entitlement up to 1985. The European Court concluded that the above difference in treatment was not based on any objective and reasonable justification (violation of Article 14 of the Convention taken together with Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention).

Possible individual and/or general measures: publication of the European Court’s judgment and diffusion to all tribunals which may be faced with similar questions; other measure(s) to be discussed at the meeting.

H46-69         34549          Meulendijks, judgment of 14/05/2002, final on 14/08/2002

The case concerns the excessive length of proceedings before the Trade Association for the Timber and Furniture Industry and the Timber Wholesale Trade (Bedrijfsvereniging voor de Hout- en Meubelindustrie en Groothandel in Hout) and administrative tribunals, concerning a dispute over social security contributions which lasted from 1989 to 1996 (seven years and four days)(violation of Article 6§1).

The period at issue in these cases is covered by the measures adopted by the Netherlands authorities in the Schouten and Meldrum case (judgment of 9/12/1994 – Resolution DH(96)21).

- 8 cases against Poland

H46-70         34611          Dacewicz, judgment of 02/07/2002, final on 02/10/2002

H46-71         33885          Kawka Eryk, judgment of 27/06/2002, final on 27/09/2002

The cases concern the violation of the applicants’ right to be brought quickly before a judge following their arrest (violation of Article 5§3).

These cases present similarities to the case of Niedbała against Poland (judgment of 4 July 2000, Resolution ResDH(2002)124), which was closed taking into account the legislative and other measures adopted by Poland to prevent new, similar violations.

Section 2

H46-72         24244          Migoń, judgment of 25/06/2002, final on 25/09/2002

The case concerns the unfairness of the judicial proceedings concerning the extension of the applicant's detention on remand between 1993 and 1995. This was due to the impossibility for the applicant and his lawyer to take part in the hearing and to have access to the case-file at certain stages of proceedings (violations of Article 5§4).

This case presents similarities to that of Włoch against Poland (judgment of 19 October 2000), which will be examined in Section 5.1 of the present annotated Agenda for supervision of the legislative and other general measures adopted to prevent similar violations.

H46-73         27715+        Berliński Roman and Sławomir, judgment of 20/06/2002, final on 20/09/2002

The case concerns in particular the prosecutor's failure to deal with the applicants' request for free legal assistance at the first stage of criminal proceedings. The applicants were deprived of a lawyer for more than a year and were sentenced in 1996 to one and one-and-a-half years’ imprisonment, suspended (violation of Articles 6§§1 and 3c).

Possible individual and/or general measures: Publication of the judgment and its wide dissemination to all prosecutors.

                   - Cases of length of civil proceedings

Item	Application	Case	Length of proceedings	Pending cases
H46-74	48001	Goc, judgment of 16/04/02, final on 16/07/02	+21 years and 6 months[16]	Yes
H46-75	29695	Gronuś, judgment of 28/05/02, final on 28/08/02	5 years and 11 months	No
H46-76	40835	Szaparo, judgment of 23/05/02, final on 23/08/02	19 years and 3 months[17]	No
H46-77	48684	Uthke, judgment of 18/06/02, final on 18/09/02	+ 9 years and 10 months[18]	Yes

These cases concern the excessive length of certain civil proceedings (violations of Article 6§1). They present similarities to the others relating to the excessive length of civil proceedings (Podbielski against Poland, judgment of 30/10/2001) for examination under sub-section 5.1 for supervision of general measures[19].

Possible individual measure: Accelerate the pending proceedings at national level (Goc and Uthke cases).

- 5 cases against Portugal

                   - Cases of length of civil proceedings

H46-78         47833          Marques Francisco, judgment of 06/06/2002, final on 06/09/2002

This case concerns the excessive length of certain civil proceedings (violation of Article 6§1). Proceedings started on 11 July 1991 and finished on 15 November 2001 (ten years and four months).

Section 2

*H46-79        54073          Agostinho, judgment of 03/10/2002 - Friendly settlement

*H46-80        50843+        Longotrans - Transportes Internacionais Lda, judgment of 03/10/2002 - Friendly settlement

*H46-81        53793          Morais Sarmento, judgment of 03/10/2002 - Friendly settlement

*H46-82        54449          Saraiva e Lei, judgment of 03/10/2002 - Friendly settlement

These cases concern the length of certain civil proceedings (complaints under Article 6§1).

- 8 cases against Romania

H46-83         35831          Bălănescu, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002

H46-84         34992          Basacopol, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002

H46-85          33912          Budescu and Petrescu, judgment of 02/07/2002, final on 02/10/2002, rectified on 09/07/2002

H46-86         29053          Ciobanu, judgment of 16/07/2002, final on 16/10/2002

H46-87         32925          Cretu, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002

H46-88         32943          Falcoianu and others, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002

H46-89         29968          Hodoş and others, judgment of 21/05/2002, final on 04/09/2002[20]

H46-90         29407          Vasiliu, judgment of 21/05/2002, final on 04/09/2002[21]

These cases concern the Supreme Court’s annulment of final court decisions delivered at first instance establishing the validity of the applicants' titles to real estate. The Supreme Court intervened following applications for nullity lodged by the Procurator General on the ground of Article 330 of the Code of civil procedure, which allowed him at any moment to challenge final court decisions. The European Court considered that by acting in this way, the Supreme Court had failed to acknowledge the security of legal transactions and accordingly violated the applicants’ right to a fair trial. It also took the view that the Supreme Court had infringed the applicants’ right of access to a tribunal in that it had not recognised courts’ jurisdiction over disputes concerning recovery of real estate (violations of Article 6§1 except in the Basacopol case in which this disposition had not been invoked). Finally the European Court found that the Supreme Court’s decisions had violated the applicants’ right to respect for their possessions (violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1).

These cases present similarities to that of Brumarescu against Romania (judgments of 23/01/01 and 11/05/01) which will be examined in Section 4.2 of this meeting for supervision of general measures.

- 1 case against the Russian federation

H46-91         47095          Kalashnikov, judgment of 15/07/2002, final on 15/10/2002

The case concerns the poor conditions of the applicant's pre-trial detention between 1995 and 2000 which was found by the European Court to amount to degrading treatment, due in particular to severe prison overcrowding and an unsanitary environment; and its detrimental effect on the applicant's health and well-being, combined with the length of the period during which the applicant was detained in these conditions (violation of Article 3). The case also concerns the excessive length of this detention (1 year, 2 months falling within the Court's jurisdiction - violation of Article 5§3) and the excessive length of criminal proceedings brought against the applicant (1 year, 10 months falling within the Court's jurisdiction - violation of Article 6§1).

Possible individual and/or general measures: to be discussed at the meeting.

Section 2

- 1 case against the Slovak Republic

H46-92         32106          Komanický, judgment of 04/06/2002, final on 04/09/2002[22]

The case concerns a violation of the applicant’s right to fair trial during civil proceedings initiated after his dismissal from employment. The European Court concluded that the procedure followed in this case by the national courts did not enable the applicant to participate properly in the proceedings and to comment on all evidence adduced, and thus did not satisfy the requirements of the principle of the equality of arms (violation of Article 6§1).

Possible individual and/or general measures: Publication and wide dissemination of the European Court’s judgment to civil courts; other measure(s) to be discussed at the meeting.

- 1 case against Sweden

H46-93         30526          De Laczay Ervin and Olga, judgment of 24/09/2002 - Friendly settlement

The case concerns the length of civil proceedings (complaint under Article 6§1).

- 16 cases against Turkey

*H46-94        38578          Kaplan Süleyman, judgment of 10/10/2002 - Friendly settlement

*H46-95        33234          N.Ö, judgment of 17/10/2002 - Friendly settlement

These cases concern allegations of ill-treatment while the applicants were in police custody and, in the N. Ö. Case, the alleged murder of the applicant’s husband in the course of operations conducted by security forces in 1993 and 1995 in Diyarbakır and Ankara respectively (complaints under Articles 2 and 3).

According to the friendly settlements, the Turkish Government, in addition to payment of compensation, undertakes notably to issue appropriate instructions and adopt all the necessary measures – including the obligation to carry out effective investigations – to ensure that the right to life and the prohibition of such forms of ill-treatment are respected in the future. The Government also referred to the Committee of Ministers’ supervision of execution of other similar judgments.

The complaints and the governmental undertakings made in these cases present similarities with those made in a number of other friendly settlements relating to actions of the Turkish security forces, which will be re-examined under subsection 4.2 of this annotated agenda for supervision of their implementation.

                   - Cases concerning the length of detention in custody

H46-96         29296          İğdeli, judgment of 20/06/2002, final on 20/09/2002

H46-97         34481          Filiz and Kalkan, judgment of 20/06/2002, final on 20/09/2002

These cases concern the applicants’ prolonged detention in police custody in Istanbul and Izmir in 1995 and 1996 (respectively 7 and 8 days) (violation of Article 5 § 3).The İğdeli case also concerns the fact that the applicant could not speedily challenge the lawfulness of his detention before a judge as the length of this detention was in conformity with the legislation applicable at the time (violation of Article 5§4).

These cases present similarities to Sakık and others against Turkey (judgment of 26/11/1997) which was closed by a final resolution, ResDH(2002)110, following the adoption of general measures by the Turkish authorities.

Section 2

                   - Cases against Turkey concerning freedom of expression

H46-98         33179          Karataş Seher, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002

H46-99         29590          Yağmurdereli, judgment of 04/06/2002, final on 04/09/2002

Both cases concern violations of the applicants’ freedom of expression on account of their conviction following respectively the publication of an article in the magazine of which Ms Karataş was editor and a speech given in 1991 by Mr Yağmurdereli. Ms Karataş was sentenced in 1995, under Article 312 of the Criminal Code, to a prison sentence later converted into a fine. Mr Yağmurdereli was sentenced in 1994 (confirmed in 1995 and 1997) under Article 8 of the Anti-Terror Law to 10 months’ prison and a fine. In January 2001, in conformity with the laws 4454 and 4616 on conditional suspension of sentences, the prison sentence was suspended for three years and the applicant released. In both cases, the European Court concluded that these convictions were not necessary in a democratic society (violations of Article 10). In this respect, the cases are similar inter alia to the case of Inçal (judgment of 09/06/98).

The European Court also held in both cases that there had been violations of the applicants’ right to a fair trial because of the presence of a military judge in the State Security Court which convicted them (violations of Article 6§1). As regards this last aspect, measures have already been adopted to prevent new violations (see Resolution DH(99)555 in the Çiraklar case).

Possible individual and/or general measures: Publication of the judgment of the European Court. In its Interim Resolution ResDH(2001)106, the Committee of Ministers urged the Turkish authorities to take ad hoc measures allowing rapid and full erasure of the consequences of applicants’ convictions contrary to the Convention in cases where the Court had found violations of Article 10. It furthermore encouraged the Turkish authorities to bring the comprehensive reforms planned to bring Turkish law into conformity with the requirements of Article 10 of the Convention to a successful conclusion. It is proposed to resume the examination of the individual and general measures required in this kind of cases in February 2003.

- Cases relating to the administration’s delay in payment of additional compensation for expropriation and the applicable rate of default interest

H46-100       20132          Bilgin Burhan, judgment of 20/06/2002, final on 20/09/2002

H46-101       20133          Bilgin Leyli, judgment of 20/06/2002, final on 20/09/2002

H46-102       20134          Bilgin Münir, judgment of 20/06/2002, final on 20/09/2002

H46-103       20136          Canlı, judgment of 20/06/2002, final on 20/09/2002

H46-104       20142          Günal Kazım, judgment of 20/06/2002, final on 20/09/2002

H46-105       20153          Şen Ismet, judgment of 20/06/2002, final on 20/09/2002

H46-106       20156          Şen Kemal, judgment of 20/06/2002, final on 20/09/2002

H46-107       20154          Şen Mahmut, judgment of 20/06/2002, final on 20/09/2002

H46-108       20158          Taşdemir Mehmet No. 2, judgment of 20/06/2002, final on 20/09/2002

These cases concern in particular the applicants’ complaints of breaches of their right to the peaceful enjoyment of their possessions due to the administration’s delay in paying additional compensation awarded by domestic courts for expropriation of their property and due to the substantial difference between the default interest rate applicable at the time and the average rate of inflation in Turkey (violations of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1).

These cases present similarities to those of Akkuş and Akaagainst Turkey (judgments of 09/07/1997 and 23/09/1998) closed by Resolutions ResDH(2001)71 and ResDH(2001)70 respectively, following a legislative reform which brought the statutory rate of default interest into line with the annual rediscount rate applied by the Turkish Central Bank to short-term debts (the latter rate is fixed and permanently reviewed, taking into account particularly the country’s inflation rate).

*H46-109      30944          Öcal, judgment of 10/10/2002 - Friendly settlement

The case concerns the length of certain civil proceedings concerning the determination of the applicant’s title to a piece of land (complaint under Article 6§1).

Possible individual and/or general measures: Publication of the judgment of the European Court.

Section 2

- 7 cases against the United Kingdom

H46-110       43290          McShane, judgment of 28/05/2002, final on 28/08/2002

The case concerns the death of the applicant’s husband, following a collision involving a military vehicle during an operation by the security forces to contain a riot in Londonderry (July 1996). The Court found that the proceedings for investigating the death had shown the following shortcomings: the police officers investigating the incident were not sufficiently independent from the officers implicated in the incident; the police investigation was not expeditive enough; the soldier who fatally injured the applicant’s husband could not be required to attend the inquest as a witness; the inquest procedure did not allow any verdict or findings which could play an effective role in securing a prosecution in respect of any criminal offence which may have been disclosed; the non-disclosure of witness statements and other relevant documents contributed to long adjournments in the proceedings; the inquest proceedings did not commence promptly (violations of Article 2 in its procedural obligation).

The case also concerns the Court’s finding that there had been a failure by the respondent state to comply with its obligations under Article 34, in that the police had – albeit unsuccessfully – brought disciplinary proceedings against the solicitor who represented the applicant in national proceedings for having disclosed certain witness statements to the applicant’s legal representatives before the European Court.

With respect to the violation of Article 2, the case presents similarities with those of McKerr, Shanaghan, Hugh Jordan and Kelly & others (judgments of 04/05/01) which are to be examined under Section 4.2 of this draft agenda and order of business.

Possible individual and/or general measures: to be discussed at the meeting.

H46-111       30668+        Wilson and the National Union of journalists; Palmer, Wyeth and the National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers; Doolan andt others, judgment of 02/07/2002, final on 02/10/2002

The case concerns the failure of the state in its positive obligation to secure the enjoyment of certain trade-union rights under Article 11, by permitting employers to use salary incentives to induce employees to surrender important union rights (violation of Article 11).The individual applicants refused to sign new, individual contracts of employment offering a wage increase in return for renouncing the right to be represented by their trade unions. As a consequence their salaries fell below those of their colleagues who had signed individual contracts.

Possible individual and/or general measures: publication and dissemination of the judgment of the European Court; other measure(s) to be discussed at the meeting.

H46-112       56547          P., C. and S., judgment of 16/07/2002, final on 16/10/2002

The case concerns measures taken by the local authority of the United Kingdom to protect the applicants’ second child from her mother, previously convicted in the United States, on the basis of medical expertise, of having ill-treated her first child. The European Court found that the applicants had not had effective access to a Court and that the measures had been unfair in that the applicants had had no legal representation in proceedings brought by the local authority in applying for a care order (proceedings started on 02/02/1999) and an order freeing for adoption (proceedings started on 15/03/1999)(violation of Article 6§1). The European Court also found breaches in the applicants’ right to family life due to the removal of the baby from her mother at birth and to the fact that the above-mentioned proceedings prevented the applicants from being involved in decisions to protect their family interests (violations of Article 8). The applicants’ daughter was finally given to adoption on 27/03/2000.

Possible individual and/or general measures: publication and wide dissemination of the judgment of the European Court, other measures to be discussed at the meeting.

Section 2

H46-113       48521          Armstrong, judgment of 16/07/2002, final on 16/10/2002

The case concerns the use of listening devices hidden by the police at the home of one of the applicants’ accomplices in order to record the applicant’s conversations. The Court found that this interference with the applicant’s right to respect for his private life, which was not in accordance with the law, since in 1994-1995 there was no domestic law regulating the use of such devices by the police (violation of Article 8). The case also concerns the lack of an effective remedy in this respect (violation of Article 13).

General measures: The case presents similarities with those of Govell, Khan and P.G. & J.H (judgments of 18/05/98, 12/05/00 and 25/09/2001 respectively), which appear in Section 6, following the adoption of the Police Act 1997 and of the Regulation of Investigation Powers Act 2000 (RIPA). Part II of the latter Act came into force on 25/09/00 and provides for the first time a statutory framework for the use of covert surveillance by a range of public authorities, including the police service. The installation of a covert listening device in residential premises is partly ruled by this Act (sections 26(3) and 32) and partly by the Police Act 1997. As regards the violation of Article 13, Part IV of the RIPA provides for independent oversight of police powers by a Chief Surveillance Commissioner and establishes an independent tribunal to consider complaints concerning the use of surveillance powers.

H46-114       37471          Faulkner William (No. 2), judgment of 04/06/2002, final on 04/09/2002

The case concerns the violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his correspondence in that the prison authorities failed to send on a letter he had addressed in 1996 to the Scottish Minister of State. The court found that this interference was neither provided for by law nor necessary in a democratic society (violation of Article 8).

H46-115       65905          Rice, judgment of 01/10/2002 - Friendly settlement

The case concerns the applicant’s complaint that as a widower he had been subject to discrimination on grounds of sex in that the social security benefit for widowed parents, the Widowed Mother’s Allowance, was available only to women (complaint under Article 14 together with Article 8 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1).

The case present similarities with the Crossland, Cornwell and Leary cases (see Resolutions ResDH(2000)81, ResDH(2002)95 and ResDH(2002)96 respectively adopted in these cases).

H46-116       42007          Davies, judgment of 16/07/2002, final on 16/10/2002, rectified on 13/09/2002

The case concerns the excessive length of certain civil proceedings concerning the disqualification of the applicant from a post in a company, which lasted almost 5 years and 6 months (violation of Article 6§1).

Possible individual and/or general measures: Publication of European Court’s judgment.

- 1 case against the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia

*H46-117      58185          Janeva, judgment of 03/10/2002 - Friendly settlement

The case concerns the length of certain proceedings concerning civil rights and obligations before labour courts (complaint under Article 6§1).

SECTION 3 - JUST SATISFACTION

Action

The Deputies are invited to supervise the payment of just satisfaction in the following cases pending before the Committee of Ministers for execution supervision. The Deputies are invited to resume consideration of these cases in principle at their next Human Rights meeting.

3.a               SUPERVISION OF THE PAYMENT OF THE CAPITAL SUM OF THE JUST SATISFACTION AS WELL AS, WHERE DUE, OF DEFAULT INTEREST, IN CASES WHERE THE DEADLINE FOR PAYMENT EXPIRED LESS THAN 6 MONTHS AGO

At the time of issuing the present Annotated Agenda and Order of Business, the Secretariat had not received the written confirmation of payment of just satisfaction and/or default interest in the following cases (see the table below summarising the total number of cases by States). The Representatives of the States concerned are invited to give the Secretariat written confirmation of payment of the sums awarded by the Court and/or the default interests.

- 3 cases against Austria

H46-119       29271          Dichand and others, judgment of 26/02/02, final on 26/05/02

H46-121       34315          Krone Verlag Gmbh and Co. Kg., judgment of 26/02/02, final on 26/05/02

                   - Default interest to be paid

H46-123       36075          Siegl, judgment of 20/06/2002 - Friendly settlement

- 1 case against Belgium

                   - Default interest to be paid

H46-125       51564          Čonka, judgment of 05/02/02, final on 05/05/02

- 1 case against Cyprus

H46-126       50516          Georgiadis, judgment of 14/05/2002, final on 14/08/2002

- 46 cases against France

                   - Just satisfaction to be paid

H46-129       38436          APBP, judgment of 21/03/2002, final on 21/06/2002

H46-130       32911+        Meftah, Adoud and Bosoni, judgment of 26/07/2002 - Grand Chamber[23]

H46-131       36515          Fretté, judgment of 26/02/02, final on 26/05/02

H46-132       32872          Peltier, judgment of 21/05/2002, final on 21/08/2002

H46-133       46044          Lallement, judgment of 11/04/2002, final on 11/07/2002

H32-134       26242          Lemoine Pierre

H46-135       36677          SA Dangeville, judgment of 16/04/2002, final on 16/07/2002

H46-136       37971          Sociétés Colas Est, judgment of 16/04/2002, final on 16/07/2002

H46-137       41476          Laine, judgment of 17/01/02, final on 17/04/02

H46-138       39278          Langlois, judgment of 07/02/02, final on 07/05/02

H46-139       39626          Granata, judgment of 19/03/02, final on 19/06/02

H46-140       47575          Marks and Ordinateur Express, judgment of 21/02/02, final on 21/05/02

H32-141       29877          Pauchet and others - Interim Resolution DH(98)100

Section 3.a

H46-142       44952+        Van der Kar and Lissaur Van West, judgment of 19/03/02, final on 19/06/02

H46-143       48215          Lutz, judgment of 26/03/2002, final on 26/06/2002

H46-144       47007          Arnal, judgment of 19/03/02, final on 19/06/02

H46-145       55672          Beaume Marty, judgment of 19/03/02, final on 19/06/02

H46-146       46280          Benzi, judgment of 19/03/02, final on 19/06/02

H46-147       49622          Goubert and Labbe, judgment of 19/03/02, final on 19/06/02

H46-148       50996          Grand, judgment of 26/03/2002, final on 26/06/2002

H46-149       42189          H.L., judgment of 07/02/02, final on 07/05/02

H46-150       57753          C.K., judgment of 19/03/02, final on 19/06/02

H46-151       42588          Linard, judgment of 25/06/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-152       44485          Moullet, judgment of 26/03/2002, final on 26/06/2002

H46-153       45573          Moyer, judgment of 25/06/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-154       41946+        Ribes J.M. and M.A., judgment of 07/05/2002, final on 07/08/2002

H46-155       51818          Société Comabat, judgment of 26/03/2002, final on 26/06/2002

H46-156       56198          Société Industrielle d’Entretien and de Service (Sies), judgment of 19/03/02, final on 19/06/02

H46-157       54757          Chaufour, judgment of 19/03/02, final on 19/06/02[24]

H46-158       48205+        Gentilhomme, Schaff-Benhadji and Zerouki, judgment of 14/05/2002, final on 14/08/2002[25]

H46-159       39996          Ouendeno, judgment of 16/04/2002, final on 10/07/2002[26][27]

H46-160       42406          Vallar, judgment of 19/03/02, final on 19/06/02

H46-161       44070          Beljanski, judgment of 07/02/02, final on 07/05/02

H46-162       44797+        Etcheveste and Bidart, judgment of 21/03/2002, final on 21/06/2002

                   - Default interest to be paid

H32-163       31677          Watson John

H46-164       39594          Kress, judgment of 07/06/01, final on 07/06/01

H46-165       40472          Tricard, judgment of 10/07/01, final on 10/10/01

H46-166       42195          Mortier, judgment of 31/07/01, final on 31/10/01

H46-167       41526          Pulvirenti, judgment of 28/11/00, final on 28/11/00

H46-168       48167          Hababou, judgment of 26/04/01, final on 26/04/01

H46-169       44211          Lacombe, judgment of 07/11/00, final on 07/02/01

H46-170       47631          Lemort, judgment of 26/04/01, final on 26/04/01

H46-171       39273          Vermeersch, judgment of 22/05/01, final on 22/08/01

H32-172       39966          De Cantelar

H46-173       49342          Dunan, judgment of 30/10/01 – Friendly settlement

H46-174       49350          Ivars, judgment of 30/10/01 – Friendly settlement

- 9 cases against Greece

                   - Just satisfaction to be paid

H46-175       48392          Hatzitakis, judgment of 11/04/2002, final on 11/07/2002

H46-176       48679          AEPI S.A., judgment of 11/04/2002, final on 11/07/2002

H46-177       46356          Smokovitis and others, judgment of 11/04/2002, final on 11/07/2002

H46-178       49215          Angelopoulos, judgment of 11/04/2002, final on 11/07/2002

H46-179       46806          Sakellaropoulos Yeoryios, judgment of 11/04/2002, final on 11/07/2002

H46-180       47891          Spentzouris, judgment of 07/05/2002, final on 07/08/2002

H46-181       46352          Logothetis, judgment of 12/04/01, final on 12/07/01 and judgment of 18/04/02

                                      (Article 41), final on 18/07/02

Section 3.a

                   - Default interest to be paid

H46-182       49282          Marinakos, judgment of 04/10/01 – Friendly settlement

H46-183       47020          Kolokitha, judgment of 07/06/01

- 548 cases against Italy

H46-184       51672          Selva, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02

H46-185       25639          F.L., judgment of 20/12/01, final on 20/03/02

H46-186       47247          Mercuri, judgment of 11/04/02 - Friendly settlement

H46-187       41232          Quartucci, judgment of 28/03/02 – Friendly settlement

H46-188       33202          Beyeler, judgments of 05/01/00 (merits) and of 28/05/02 (just satisfaction)

H46-189       30127          Sciortino, judgment of 18/10/01, final on 27/03/02

H46-190       39797          Guazzone, judgment of 11/07/2002 - Friendly settlement (rectified on 01/08/2002)

H46-191       35243          N. and D.A., judgment of 18/07/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-192       34714          Tacchino and Scorza, judgment of 18/07/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-193       37248          Vietti, judgment of 18/07/2002 - Friendly settlement

- Civil courts[28]

H46-194       52979          An.M., judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-195       51671          Arrigoni, judgment of 11/12/2001, final on 11/03/2002

H46-196       56084          At.M., judgment of 07/05/02, final on 07/08/02

H46-197       51678          Baioni and Badini, judgment of 11/12/2001, final on 11/03/2002

H46-198       52987          Barone Antonio and others, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-199       52974          Beneventano, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-200       51667          Bertot, judgment of 11/12/2001, final on 11/03/2002

H46-201       52914          Bruno Paolo, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-202       56092          Calvagni and Formiconi, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-203       51696          Cappelletti and Dell’Agnese, judgment of 11/12/2001, final on 11/03/2002

H46-204       52915          Cazzato, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-205       52970          Ciancetta and Mancini, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-206       56095          Colasanti, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-207       56085          Cristina, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-208       52925          D’Alfonso, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-209       52921          Damiano, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-210       52920          De Rosa la Francesco, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-211       52923          De Santis III, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-212       52968          Del Bono and others, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-213       56106          Dell’Aquila, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-214       52978          Di Niso, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-215       41740          Diebold, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-216       44519          E.M. II, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-217       52972          Falzarano Carmine, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-218       52916          Ferrara Vincenza, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-219       52984          Ge.Im.A.S.a.s., judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-220       56099          Genovesi, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-221       44413          Guerrera Angelo Giuseppe, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-222       51708          I.M., judgment of 11/12/2001, final on 11/03/2002

H46-223       52957          I.P.A. S.r.l., judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-224       56088          IT.R., judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

Section 3.a

H46-225       44396          Ital Union Servizi S.a.s. No. 1, judgment of 12/02/2002, final on 04/09/2002[29]

H46-226       44913          Ital Union Servizi S.a.s. No. 2, judgment of 12/02/2002, final on 04/09/2002[30]

H46-227       44914          Ital Union Servizi S.a.s. No. 3, judgment of 12/02/2002, final on 04/09/2002[31]

H46-228       52986          L.S., judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-229       52958          Lombardo la Francesco, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-230       51668          Lopriore, judgment of 11/12/2001, final on 11/03/2002

H46-231       52919          Luciani, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-232       51706          Mannari, judgment of 11/12/2001, final on 11/03/2002

H46-233       47479          Mastromauro S.R.L., judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-234       52973          Mattaliano, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-235       56101          Mesiti, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-236       52926          Mostacciuolo, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-237       56089          Murru V, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-238       56098          Pelagatti, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-239       52976          Policriti and Gioffré, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-240       41803          Pupillo, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00; revised judgment on just satisfaction on 18/12/01, final on 18/03/02

H46-241       52971          R.L., judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-242       52962          Raffio, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-243       52913          Rapisarda, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-244       44409          Rizzo Giuseppe, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02, rectified on 09/07/02

H46-245       51664          Rodolfi, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02

H46-246       52969          Romano Almanio Antonio, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-247       51710          Rossi Gianbattista, judgment of 11/12/2001, final on 11/03/2002

H46-248       52988          Rossi Maria Giovanna, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-249       51704          Rota Giacomo and Gianfranco, judgment of 11/12/2001, final on 11/03/2002

H46-250       51705          Rota Roberto and Giuseppe, judgment of 11/12/2001, final on 11/03/2002

H32-251       30423          Salini Costruttori Spa, Interim Resolution DH(99)673

H46-252       52977          Savona II, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-253       52918          Scinto, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-254       52983          Seccia, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-255       52959          Sessa, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-256       52989          Sirufo, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-257       56093          Società Croce Gialla Romana S.a.s., judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-258       51670          Sordelli and C. S.n.c., judgment of 11/12/2001, final on 11/03/2002

H46-259       51711          Spanu, judgment of 11/12/2001, final on 11/03/2002

H46-260       56105          Spinelli, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-261       56094          Sposito, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-262       52990          Stabile, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-263       49314          Steiner and Hassid Steiner, judgment of 06/12/2001, final on 06/03/2002

H46-264       51673          Tiozzo Peschiero L. and L., judgment of 11/12/2001, final on 11/03/2002

H46-265       52967          Vaccarella, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-266       51707          Vanzetti, judgment of 11/12/2001, final on 11/03/2002

H46-267       56086          Vazzana, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-268       52960          Ventrone, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-269       56096          Venturin, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-270       52965          Vetrone, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-271       52963          Zotti and Ferrara I, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-272       52964          Zotti and Ferrara II, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-273       52966          Zotti, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

Section 3.a

- Administrative courts[32]

H46-274       56226          Abate and Ferdinandi, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02

H46-275       56222          Centis, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02

H46-276       56206          Colonnello and others, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02

H46-277       56208          Conte and others, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02

H46-278       56202          Cornia, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02

H46-279       56224          D’Amore, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02

H46-280       56217          De Cesaris, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02

H46-281       56205          Dente, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02

H46-282       56225          Di Pede II, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02

H46-283       56221          Donato, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02

H46-284       56212          Folletti, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02

H46-285       44342          Gattuso, judgment of 06/12/2001, final on 06/03/2002

H46-286       56203          Ginocchio, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02

H46-287       44334          Lattanzi and Cascia, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-288       56204          Limatola, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02

H46-289       56207          Lugnan in Basile, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02

H46-290       56211          Napolitano Giuseppe, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02

H46-291       56220          Mastropasqua, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02

H46-292       56213          Piacenti, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02

H46-293       56223          Polcari, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02

H46-294       56219          Presel, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02

H46-295       56214          Ripoli I, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02

H46-296       56215          Ripoli II, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02

H46-297       56201          Sardo Salvatore, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02

H46-298       56218          Stabile Michele, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02

H46-299       44333          V.P. and F.D.R., judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

- Court of Audit

H46-300       54282          Amici, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-301       54316          Betti, judgment of 28/03/02 – Friendly settlement

H46-302       54293          Chiappetta Domenico, judgment of 28/03/02 – Friendly settlement

H46-303       54287          Ferrari Sergio, judgment of 28/03/02 – Friendly settlement

H46-304       54278          Leonardi, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-305       54299          Libertini and Di Girolamo, judgment of 28/03/02 – Friendly settlement

H46-306       54312          Manna, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-307       44359          Marrama, judgment of 28/03/02 – Friendly settlement

H46-308       54318          Picano, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-309       54319          Sportola, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-310       54286          Strangi, judgment of 07/05/02 – Friendly settlement

- Labour courts[33]

H46-311       51031          Aceto and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-312       51089          Armellino la Francesco, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-313       51093          Armellino Lucia, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-314       52824          Belviso and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-315       56091          Bernardini, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-316       56103          Bevilacqua Giovanni, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-317       52804          Bianco Pellegrino, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-318       52816          Biondi and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-319       51030          Biondo, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-320       51150          Calabrese, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-321       51134          Cardo Cristina, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

Section 3.a

H46-322       51146          Cardo Elisa, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-323       51127          Carolla, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-324       52835          Cerbo and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-325       52801          Ciarmoli, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-326       52815          Cimmino and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-327       51112          Circelli Maria Antonia, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-328       52807          Ciullo, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-329       52821          Colangelo Domenico, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-330       51116          Colella, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-331       51147          Crisci, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-332       51164          Crovella, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-333       56104          Cullari, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-334       51149          Cuozzo Giovanna, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-335       51154          Cuozzo la Francesco, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-336       51163          D’Angelo Michele, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-337       51125          De Filippo, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-338       51098          De Rosa Giovanna, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-339       51141          De Rosa Maria, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-340       51137          Del Grosso Nicola, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-341       51160          Del Re, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-342       51027          Del Vecchio Anna Rita, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-343       51155          Della Ratta, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-344       51129          Di Dio, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-345       51131          Di Maria, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-346       52813          Di Meo and Masotta, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-347       52846          Di Meo Antonio, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-348       51099          Di Meo Franca, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-349       51092          Di Mezza, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-350       51157          Di Resta, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-351       51143          Donato Pepe, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-352       51119          Esposito Lucia, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-353       51145          Falluto, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-354       51121          Falzarano Pasquale, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-355       51091          Ferrara Clementina, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/2002

H46-356       51128          Ferrara Serafina, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-357       51144          Fiorenza Carmine, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-358       51142          Formato, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-359       52843          Franco and Basile, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-360       52924          Frattini and others, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-361       51161          Gagliardi, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-362       51103          Gattone and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-363       51135          Gaudino Palma, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-364       47186          Gentile Agostino, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-365       52830          Giannotta and Iannella, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-366       51148          Gisondi, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-367       51159          Grasso Alfonsina, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-368       51094          Iacobucci and Lavorgna, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-369       51153          Iannotta Antonietta, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-370       51102          Iesce and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-371       51120          Izzo Antonio, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-372       51170          Izzo Giovanni, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-373       51021          La Torella, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-374       52802          Lagozzino, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-375       52812          Lavorgna and Iorio, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-376       51140          Lombardi Emma, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-377       51100          Lombardi Gaetana, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

Section 3.a

H46-378       52822          Macolino, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-379       52819          Mancino, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-380       51169          Marotta Alberto, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-381       51138          Marotta Arturo, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-382       51168          Martino Alfonso, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-383       52827          Mastrocinque Mafalda, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-384       51167          Matera Tommasina, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-385       51101          Maturo and Vegliante, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-386       52845          Mazzarelli, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-387       51130          Mazzone and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-388       51158          Meccariello, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-389       51118          Melillo, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-390       51677          Meneghini, judgment of 11/12/2001, final on 11/03/2002

H46-391       52818          Meola, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-392       51133          Moffa, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-393       52840          Mongillo Mario, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-394       44428          Nardone Antonio, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-395       51136          Nazzaro, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-396       52832          Nero and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-397       51029          Ocone, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-398       51105          Pacifico, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-399       51114          Paduano, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-400       52829          Pallotta, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-401       51023          Palmieri Maddalena, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-402       51022          Palmieri Mario la Francesco, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-403       52841          Panza, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-404       52837          Pascale and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-405       52842          Pascale Elda, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-406       52826          Pascale Maria Annunziata, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-407       51111          Patuto Salvatore, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-408       51113          Pelosi Concetta, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-409       51162          Pengue, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-410       52808          Perna Giuseppina, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-411       52828          Petrillo and Petrucci, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-412       51025          Petrillo Gino, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-413       51139          Pilla Addolorata, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-414       51024          Porto, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-415       52825          Pucella and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-416       51126          Raccio Emilia, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-417       51109          Restuccio, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-418       51095          Riccardi Lucia, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-419       52820          Riccardi Vicenzina, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-420       51096          Riccio and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-421       51108          Rinaldi, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-422       52823          Romano and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-423       52844          Romano Rosa, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-424       51151          Ruggiero, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-425       52833          Santagata, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-426       51165          Santina Pelosi, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-427       51090          Scaccianemici, judgment of 28/02/02, final on28/05/02

H46-428       52982          Sciacchitano and Lo Sciuto, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-429       40151          Sciarrotta, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-430       52917          Serino Antonella, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-431       52831          Simone and Pontillo, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-432       51115          Spagnoletti, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-433       52839          Tanzillo, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

Section 3.a

H46-434       52836          Tazza and Zullo, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-435       52810          Tazza, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-436       52922          Tommaso, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H46-437       51152          Tretola, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-438       52809          Truocchio Edmondo, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-439       51166          Truocchio Mario, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-440       51124          Tudisco, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-441       51097          Uccellini and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-442       52817          Urbano and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-443       51026          Uzzo, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-444       52811          Villari, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-445       52847          Viscuso, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-446       51028          Vitelli, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-447       51132          Zeolla, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-448       52814          Zoccolillo and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-449       52800          Zuotto, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

- Criminal proceedings combined with civil action for damages[34]

H46-450       46970          Contardi, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

                   - Default interest to be paid

H46-451       39676          Rojas Morales, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01

H46-452       26772          Labita, judgment of 06/04/00, final on 06/04/00

H46-453       30882          Pellegrini Maria Grazia, judgment of 20/07/01, final on 20/10/01

H46-454       15918          Antonetto, judgment of 20/07/00, final on 20/10/00

H46-455       28168          Quadrelli, judgment of 11/01/00, final on 20/03/00

H46-456       33354          Lucà, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H46-457       26161          Natoli, judgment of 09/01/01

H32-458       19734          F.S. I, Interim Resolution DH(98)209

H46-459       28272          Ghidotti, judgment of 21/02/02, final on 21/05/02

H46-460       41852          Vaccaro, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01

- Civil courts[35]

H46-461       44481          A.C. VII, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-462       46515          Adriani, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H46-463       46964          Alpites S.P.A., judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-464       47785          Angemi, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-465       48412          Ar.M., judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02

H46-466       46958          Ardemagni and Ripa, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H32-467       39900          Artuso Paolo

H32-468       39137          Avallone

H46-469       44511          Bellagamba, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-470       40977          Beltramo, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01

H46-471       44431          Beluzzi and others, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H46-472       39883          Bertozzi, judgment of 27/04/00, final on 27/04/00

H46-473       44442          Bevilacqua, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H46-474       36811          Bielectric S.R.L., judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01

H46-475       44437          Bocca, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H32-476       39121          Bolla

H46-477       44457          Bonelli, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-478       44436          Buffalo s.r.l., judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H46-479       46534          Burghesu, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01

Section 3.a

H46-480       46980          C.L., judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H32-481       35292          Calandrella F., P. and 2 others

H46-482       39881          Capodanno, judgment of 05/04/00, final on 05/04/00

H46-483       45071          Capurro and Tosetti, judgment of 28/04/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-484       46526          Carboni, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01

H46-485       45859          Caruso Giuseppina, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01

H46-486       45861          Cavallaro, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01

H46-487       36620          Ceriello, judgment of 26/10/99, final on 26/10/99

H46-488       46537          Cerulli and Zadra, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01

H46-489       45869          Chiappetta, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01

H46-490       46959          Circo and others, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-491       44504          Citterio and Angiolillo, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-492       47779          Ciuffetti, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-493       46532          Conte Gaspare and others, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01

H46-494       47774          Conti Giuliana, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H46-495       44385          Cornaglia, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H46-496       46527          Corsi, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01

H46-497       35616          Coscia, judgment of 11/04/00, final on 11/04/00

H46-498       46538          Costantini Francesco, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01

H46-499       44500          Cova, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-500       45880          Cultraro, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H46-501       46536          D.C. IV, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01

H46-502       45872          D’Annibale, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01

H32-1442     17482          D'Aquino and Petrizzi, Interim Resolution DH(96)28

H46-503       40216          D’Arrigo and Garrozzo, judgment of 21/11/00, final on 21/02/01

H32-504       40566          De Cicco Concetta

H32-505       40580          De Lorenzi

H46-506       42520          De Simone Pasquale, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H32-507       39138          Di Fant I

H32-508       39139          Di Fant II

H46-509       46976          Di Motoli and others, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-510       46520          Dorigo Franco, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01

H46-511       44480          E.G., judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H32-512       39906          Emmebiemme S.r.l.

H46-513       40982          Erdokovy, judgment of 01/02/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-514       46524+        F., T. and E., judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01

H46-515       46533          F.L.S., judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01

H46-516       39164          F.S.p.A. II, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01

H46-517       46971          F.T., judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H32-518       26012          Facciolini

H46-519       46968          Falconi, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-520       47781          Farinosi and Barattelli, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-521       45870          Ferrazzo and others, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01

H46-522       45868          Filippello Giorgio II, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01

H32-523       38145          Focardi and Conti

H46-524       46965          Franceschetti and Odorico, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H32-525       38118          Fraschetti

H46-526       44397          G.B. IV, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H46-527       37131          G.M.N., judgment of 02/11/99, final on 02/11/99

H32-528       38503          G.P. and 25 others

H46-529       46543          G.S. and L.M., judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01

H46-530       47786          G.V. V, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-531       46963          Galiè, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-532       46528          Giannalia, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01

H46-533       47773          Gianni, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H46-534       45860          Giuseppe Nicola and Luciano Caruso, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01

H46-535       40968          I.F., judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01

Section 3.a

H46-536       44418          I.P.E.A. S.R.L., judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H46-537       39116          I.R., judgment of 15/02/00, final on 15/02/00

H46-538       44447          Ianniti and others, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H46-539       46516          Il Messaggero S.a.s. II, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01

H46-540       46517          Il Messaggero S.a.s. III, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01

H46-541       46518          Il Messaggero S.a.s. IV, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01

H46-542       46519          Il Messaggero S.a.s. V, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01

H46-543       47777          Ilardi, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H46-544       44508          Immobiliare Il Messaggero del geometra Antonio Iorillo, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H46-545       39894          Italiano, judgment of 15/02/00, final on 15/02/00

H46-546       46530          Iulio, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01

H46-547       40924          L. S.r.l., judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00

H46-548       46542          Lanino, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01

H32-549       31341          Lazzari and Scagnoli

H46-550       45853          Lo Cicero, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01

H32-551       40571          Lo Sardo

H46-552       46523          Lonardi, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01

H46-553       46962          Lucas International S.R.L., judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-554       44406          M. S.r.l., judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H46-555       46961          Maletti, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H32-821       28725          Manzi A., B. and L.

H46-556       44443          Marchi, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H46-557       46957          Marcolongo, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-558       44517          Mari and Mangini, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-559       44422          Marzinotto, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H46-560       46966          Massaro, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-561       46979          Mastrantonio Francesca, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-562       44420          Mauri, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H46-563       46973          Morelli and Nerattini, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-564       44490          Murgia, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H32-565       39872          Nata

H46-566       46522          Nolla, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01

H46-567       44494          O.P., judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-568       44468          P.B. V, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-569       40570          Padalino V. and G., judgment of 15/02/00, final on 15/02/00

H46-570       40952          Paderni II, judgment of 05/04/00 - Friendly settlement

H32-571       21707          Panissa, D., G. and A. Vittonetto

H32-572       39155          Perilli and Gigotti Micheli

H46-573       45070          Persichetti and C.S.r.l., judgment of 27/07/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-574       44380          Pettirossi, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H46-575       28936          Piccinini II, judgment of 11/04/00 - Friendly settlement

H32-576       39899          Pirilli

H46-577       45065          Pirola, judgment of 27/07/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-578       46967          Procaccianti, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-579       46969          Procopio, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-580       44412          Quattrone Pasquale, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H46-581       38498          Rando, judgment of 15/02/00, final on 15/02/00

H46-582       45058          Rettura, judgment of 17/10/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-583       44465          Rigutto, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-584       43098          Romano, judgment of 28/09/00

H32-585       35328          Roselli Italo II

H46-586       44479          Rosetti e Ciucci and C., judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H46-587       44527          Rossana Ferrari, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-588       44472          Rossi Valeria, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-589       44461          Sacchi Roberto, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

Section 3.a

H46-822       38135          Sanna, judgment of 11/04/00, final on 11/04/00

H46-590       44466          Santoro Valerio, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-591       47780          Santorum, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-592       45854          Savino, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 04/04/01

H46-593       44419          Sbrojavacca Pietrobon, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H46-594       36621          Scalvini, judgment of 26/10/99, final on 26/10/99

H46-595       44491          Sonego, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-596       44470          Spada, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-597       39705          Spurio II, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01

H32-598       39865          Staffolani

H46-599       44417          Tagliabue, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H32-600       38102          Talenti

H46-601       44486          Tebaldi, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-602       44425          Tedesco Michele, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H46-603       46539          Tor Di Valle Costruzioni S.P.A. VII, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01

H46-604       45068          Toscano and others, judgment of 27/07/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-605       44488          Vecchi and others, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-606       44528          Vecchini, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-607       44534          Venturini Alberto I, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H32-608       40586          Verini II

H46-609       40599          Vicari II, judgment of 15/02/00

H46-610       44395          Visentin, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H46-611       37166          Vitale and others, judgment of 02/11/99

H46-612       44445          W.I.E. S.n.c., judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H46-613       44462          Zanasi, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-614       37079          Zironi, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01

- Administrative courts[36]

H46-615       41809          A.B. V, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00

H46-616       34437          Caliendo, judgment of 14/03/00, final on 14/03/00

H46-617       41817          Caliri, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00

H46-618       41807          Centioni and others, judgment of 09/01/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-619       41815          Monti Enrico, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00

H46-620       41810          Mosca, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00

H46-621       41813          Musiani, judgment of 09/01/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-622       41816          Paradiso Antonio, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00

H46-623       31631          Procaccini, judgment of 30/03/00, final on 30/03/00

H46-624       41814          Zeoli and 34 others, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 05/10/00

- Court of Audit

H46-625       41829          Campomizzi, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00

H46-626       41833          Cardillo, judgment of 28/04/00, final on 28/07/00

H46-627       41821          Delicata, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00

H46-628       41823          Pascali and Conte, judgment of 05/04/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-629       41831          Pio, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00

H46-630       41819          Quinci, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00

H46-631       41830          Raglione, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00

H32-632       39175          Sileo

H46-633       41820          Sinagoga, judgment of 28/04/00, final on 28/07/00

H46-634       41837          Trotta, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00

H46-635       41841          Vay, judgment of 28/04/00, final on 28/07/00

H46-636       41818          Vero, judgment of 28/04/00, final on 28/07/00

Section 3.a

- Labour courts[37]

H46-637       40363          Ascierto Ada, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-638       43063          Bello, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-639       43094          C.B., judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-640       42999          Cacciacarro, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-641       43020          Ciaramella Pasquale, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H32-642       36615          Cappello

H32-643       38095          Cardillo

H46-644       46521          Ciccardi, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01

H46-645       42996          Cocca, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-646       44532          Colacrai, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 12/12/01

H46-647       43088          Coppolaro, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-648       43086          Cosimo Cesare, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-649       43087          Cosimo Rotondi, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-650       43083          Simone D’Addona, judgment of 22/06/00 – Friendly settlement

H46-651       43017          D’Ambrosio, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-652       43059          D’Antonoli, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-653       43054          Del Buono, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-654       43051          Di Biase Leonardo, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-655       43062          Di Blasio Concetta, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-656       46975          Di Gabriele, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-657       43030          Di Libero, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-658       43022          Di Mella, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-659       46978          F.P., judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-660       43056          Fallarino, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-661       43058          Foschini, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-662       45855          Fr.C., judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01

H46-663       43096          G.A. IV, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-664       43093          G.P. VI, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-665       43075          Gallo Giuseppe, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-666       37170          Giampietro, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H46-667       38975          Gioia Angelina, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-668       43050          Gioia Filomena Giovanna, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-669       43074          Grasso, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-670       39124          Guagenti, judgment of 15/02/00, final on 15/02/00

H46-671       43072          Guarino, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-672       43091          Iadarola, judgment of 27/07/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-673       42998          Iannotta, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-674       43101          Iannotti, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-675       43021          Iapalucci, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-676       43067          Izzo Italia, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-677       43065          Lanni, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-678       43102          Lepore T., Lepore M. and Iannotti T., judgment of 27/07/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-679       43068          Luciano, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-680       43095          M.C. X, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-681       43010          Mannello, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H32-682       37160          Marsicovetere

H46-683       43000          Maselli, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-684       43018          Meoli, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-685       43069          Mercone, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-686       43057          Mongillo, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-687       43064          Nicolella, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-688       43100          Orsini, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-689       43076          P.T. II, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

Section 3.a

H46-690       43012          Palumbo, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-691       43052          Panzanella, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-692       43061          Patuto, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-693       43060          Pizzi, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-694       43023          Pozella, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-695       46974          Risola, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-696       43019          Rubortone, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-697       43055          Sabatino, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-698       43099          Santillo, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-699       43085          Silvio Cesare, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-700       42997          Squillace, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-701       43084          Tontoli, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-702       46960          Trimboli, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-703       43016          Truocchio, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-704       43070          Vignona, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-705       43109          Zeoli Nicolina, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-706       43015          Zollo Clavio, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-707       43066          Zullo, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

- Criminal courts[38]

H46-708       38878          Ciacci, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-709       42351          Del Giudice, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 06/09/01

H46-710       45267          F.R. and 3 others, judgment of 26/07/01, final on 26/10/01

H46-711       41603          G.B.Z., L.Z. and S.Z., judgment of 14/12/99, final on 15/02/00

H46-712       41094          Giannangeli, judgment of 05/07/01, final on 05/10/01

H46-713       32646          Guerresi, judgment of 24/04/01, final on 24/04/01

H46-714       41893          Martinez, judgment of 26/07/01, final on 26/10/01

H46-715       44943          Orlandi, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-716       29898          Patanè, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-717       30132          Pepe Umberto, judgment of 27/04/00, final on 27/07/00

H32-718       36733          Perilli

H32-719       24170          Pesce Mario

H32-720       26806          U.O. I

H32-721       26781          U.O. II

H32-722       26782          U.O. III

H46-723       37118          Sergi, judgment of 11/04/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-724       43199          Visintin, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-725       23969          Mattoccia, judgment of 25/07/00

- Criminal proceedings combined with civil action for damages[39]

H46-726       45856          Bacigalupi, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01

H46-727       45857          Comella and others, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01

H46-728       45858          Tesconi, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01

Section 3.a

- 4 cases against Poland

                   - Just satisfaction to be paid

H46-730       33310          H.D., judgment of 20/06/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-731       29692+        R.D., judgment of 18/12/01, final on 18/03/02

H46-733       34158          Zawadzki, judgment of 20/12/01, final on 27/03/02

                   - Default interest to be paid

H32-734       24559          Gibas

- 17 cases against Portugal

                   - Just satisfaction to be paid

H46-736       48233          Almeida Do Couto, judgment of 30/05/02 - Friendly settlement

H46-738       48752          Coelho, judgment of 30/05/02 - Friendly settlement

H46-739       49020          F. Santos Lda., judgment of 16/05/02 - Friendly settlement

H46-740       45560          Guerreiro, judgment of 31/01/02, final on 30/04/02

H46-741       45725          Malveiro, judgment of 14/03/02, final on 12/06/02

H46-742       49018          Marques Jorge Ribeiro, judgment of 04/04/02 – Friendly settlement

H46-743       43999          Martins Serra and Andrade Cancio, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02

H46-744       47584          Martos Mellado Ribeiro, judgment of 30/05/02 - Friendly settlement

H46-745       52772          Pereira Palmeira and Sales Palmeira, judgment of 04/07/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-747       49118          SIB - Sociedade Imobiliária Da Benedita Lda, judgment of 16/05/02 - Friendly settlement

H46-748       44298          Tourtier, judgment of 14/02/02, final on 14/05/02

H46-749       46464          Vaz Da Silva Girão, judgment of 21/03/2002, final on 21/06/2002

H46-751       47460          Câmara Pestana, judgment of 16/05/2002, final on 16/08/2002

                   - Default interest to be paid

H46-752       46772          Baptista Do Rosàrio, judgment of 04/04/02 – Friendly settlement

H46-753       45648          Caldeira and Gomes Faria, judgment of 14/02/02 – Friendly settlement

H46-754       48960          Conceição Fernandes, judgment of 20/12/01 – Friendly settlement

H46-755       46143          Sociedade Panificadora Bombarralense Lda., judgment of 14/02/02 – Friendly settlement

- 2 cases against Romania

                   - Just satisfaction to be paid

H46-756       32260          Surpaceanu Constantin and Traian-Victor, judgment of 21/05/2002, final on 21/08/2002[40]

Section 3.a

                   - Default interest to be paid

H46-757       28342          Brumărescu, judgments of 28/10/99, 23/01/01 (Article 41) and 11/05/01

                                      (rectification) – Grand Chamber[41]

- 1 case against Slovenia

H46-758       42320          Belinger, judgment of 13/06/2002 - Friendly settlement

- 22 cases against Turkey

H46-761       27307          Bayrak Mehmet, judgment of 03/09/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-762       35076          Erol Ali, judgment of 20/06/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-766       28505          Ülger, judgment of 28/03/02 – Friendly settlement

H46-767       29856          Özcan Mehmet, judgment of 09/04/02 – Friendly settlement[42]

H46-768       29289          Aydın Mehmet, judgment of 16/07/2002 - Friendly settlement[43]

H46-769       30492          Erat and Sağlam, judgment of 26/03/02 – Friendly settlement [44]

H46-770       31136          Önder Yalçın, judgment of 25/07/2002 - Friendly settlement[45]

H46-773       30448          Önel Ahmet, judgment of 23/05/2002, final on 23/08/2002

H46-774       31964          Özel Hacı, judgment of 23/05/2002, final on 23/08/2002

H46-775       30447          Özel Hacı Osman, judgment of 23/05/2002, final on 23/08/2002

H46-776       30948          Önel Mehmet, judgment of 23/05/2002, final on 23/08/2002

H46-777       30446          Önel Temur, judgment of 23/05/2002, final on 23/08/2002

H46-780       38915          Bayram Abdullah Naci, judgment of 27/06/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-781       35867          Bayram and others, judgment of 27/06/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-782       37087          Bekmezci and others, judgment of 27/06/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-783       37414          Birsel and others, judgment of 27/06/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-784       35050          Karabıyık and others, judgment of 27/06/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-785       33419          Özdiler Hasan Doğan, judgment of 27/06/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-787       35079          Özkan and others, judgment of 27/06/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-788       35866          Ünlü Dudu, judgment of 27/06/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-789       25753          Özler, judgment of 11/07/2002 - Friendly settlement

                   - Default interest to be paid

H46-790       22876          Şemse Önen, judgment of 26/01/02, final on 14/05/02

Section 3.a

- 5 cases against the United Kingdom

H46-791       24265          Devenney, judgment of 19/03/02, final on 19/06/02

H46-792       46477          Edwards Paul and Audrey, judgment of 14/03/02, final on 14/06/02

H46-793       25680          I., judgment of 11/07/2002 - Grand Chamber

H46-794       28957          Goodwin Christine, judgment of 11/07/2002 - Grand Chamber

H46-795       40302          Matthews Michael, judgment of 15/07/2002 - Friendly settlement

3.b              SUPERVISION OF THE PAYMENT OF THE CAPITAL SUM OF THE JUST

                   SATISFACTION IN CASES WHERE THE DEADLINE FOR PAYMENT

                   EXPIRED MORE THAN 6 MONTHS AGO

Some of the cases appearing under this section concern late payment for reasons beyond the control of the Governments concerned.

Expiry date

of the time-limit set

- 18 cases against France

H32-796       26984          Picard                                                                                                     31/01/99

H46-797       30979          Frydlender, judgment of 27/06/00[46]                                                           27/09/00

H46-798       38042          Zanatta, A. and J.-B., judgment of 28/03/00, final on 28/06/00[47]                  28/09/00

H32-799       32510          Peter[48]                                                                                                     24/10/00

H32-800       25971          Proma di Franco Gianotti                                                           14/05/00+02/01/01

H46-801       32033          Thurin, judgment of 28/11/00, final on 28/02/01                                          28/05/01

H46-802       29731          Krombach, judgment of 13/02/01, final on 13/05/01                                   13/08/01

H46-803       39066          Donnadieu, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01                                  27/08/01

H32-804       31409          Riccobono                                                                                              26/09/01

H46-805       43713          Joly, judgment of 27/03/01, final on 27/06/01                                            27/09/01

H46-807       35683          Vaudelle, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 06/09/01                                      06/12/01

H46-808       41333          Brochu, judgment of 12/06/01, final on 12/09/01                                        12/12/01

H46-809       44451          A.A.U., judgment of 19/06/01, final on 19/09/01                                         19/12/01

H46-810       40096          Versini, judgment of 10/07/01, final on 10/10/01                                        10/01/02

H46-811       42211          Zannouti, judgment of 31/07/01, final on 31/10/01                                      31/01/02

H46-812       44069          G.B. II, judgment of 02/10/01, final on 02/01/02                                         02/04/02

H46-813       37794          Pannullo and Forte, judgment of 30/10/01, final on 30/01/02                      30/04/02

H46-814       33023          Meier, judgment of 07/02/02 – Friendly settlement                                     07/05/02

- 34 cases against Italy

H46-815       20855          Esposito Luigi, judgment of 25/05/00 - Friendly settlement    25/08/00

H46-816       43269          Leoni, judgment of 26/10/00, final on 04/04/01                                          04/07/01

H46-817       35972          Grande Oriente D’Italia du Palazzo Giustiniani,

                                     judgment of 02/08/01, final on 12/12/01                                                    12/03/02

H46-818       31143          Indelicato, judgment of 18/10/01, final on 18/01/02                                    18/04/02

H46-819       31260          Lamperi Balenci, judgment of 21/02/02 - Friendly settlement                      21/05/02

- Civil courts[49]

H32-820       25249          Cazzorla and Gigante                                                                               25/09/96

H46-824       44375          Rocchi Roberto, judgment of 29/03/01 - Friendly settlement                       29/07/01

H46-825       44524          Ragas, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02                                         23/04/02

H46-826       44513          D’Ammassa and Frezza, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02               25/04/02

H46-827       49372          De Pilla, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02                                       25/04/02

H46-828       44446          Di Girolamo and 6 others, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02             25/04/02

H46-829       44421          Galasso, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02                                      25/04/02

H46-830       44501          Il Messaggero S.A.S. VI, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02               25/04/02

Section 3.b

- Administratives courts[50]

H32-831       15800+        Perego and Romanet                                                                               12/04/93

H32-832       27189          Bevilacqua                                                                                              21/10/97

H46-823       44330          Principe and others, judgment of 19/12/00 - Friendly settlement                 19/03/01

H46-833       41805          Arivella, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01                                        27/08/01

H46-834       41806          Alesiani and 510 others, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01                27/08/01

H46-835       41804          Ciotta, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01                                          27/08/01

H46-836       35956          Galatà and others, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01                        27/08/01

H46-837       44525          Ferrari Marcella II, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02                         25/04/02

H46-838       44379          Finessi, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02                                        25/04/02

H46-839       44343          Massimo Giuseppe I, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02                    25/04/02

H46-840       44345          Rinaudo and others, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02                     25/04/02

H46-841       44346          Venturini Alberto II, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02                       25/04/02

H46-842       44352          Massimo Giuseppe II, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02                   25/04/02

- Labour courts[51]

H46-844       43097          Nicoli, judgment of 22/06/00 – Friendly settlement                                     22/09/00

- Court of Audit

H46-845       44365          Calvani, judgment of 21/11/00, final on 21/02/01                                        21/05/01

H46-846       44370          D’Innella, judgment of 21/11/00, final on 21/02/01                                      21/05/01

H46-847       44367          G.G. IV, judgment of 21/11/00, final on 21/02/01                                       21/05/01

H46-848       44369          Pe.C., judgment of 21/11/00, final on 21/02/01                                          21/05/01

H46-849       44368          Sapia, judgment of 21/11/00, final on 21/02/01                                          21/05/01

H46-850       44362          Di Deco, judgment of 12/04/01 – Friendly settlement                                 12/07/01

H46-851       54307          Meleddu, judgment of 21/02/02 – Friendly settlement                                21/05/02

- 6 cases against Poland

H46-852       26760          Werner, judgment of 15/11/01                                                                   15/02/02

H32-853       27506          Owczarzak, Interim Resolution DH(99)260                                                  17/03/02

H46-854       38328          Bejer, judgment of 04/10/01, final on 04/01/02                                           04/04/02

H46-855       32499          Z.R., judgment of 15/01/02 – Friendly settlement                                       15/04/02

H46-856       25196          Iwańczuk, judgment of 15/11/01, final on 15/02/02                                     15/05/02

H46-857       34052          Olstowski, judgment of 15/11/01, final on 15/02/02                                    15/05/02

- 1 case against Portugal

H46-858       43654          Pires, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02                                           25/04/02

- 47 cases against Turkey

H46-859       25723          Erdoğdu, judgment of 15/06/00                                                                15/09/00

H46-860       27308          Demiray, judgment of 21/11/00, final on 04/04/01                                      04/07/01

H46-861       34688          Akin, judgment of 12/04/01                                                                      12/07/01

H46-862       19265          Atak and others, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01                           30/07/01

H46-863       19279          Göçmen and others, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01                     30/07/01

H46-864       19285          Karabulut Cemile and others, judgment of 30/01/01,

                                     final on 30/04/01                                                                                      30/07/01

H46-865       19303          Şen Celal and Keziban, judgment of 10/04/01, final on 10/07/01                 10/10/01

H46-866       19661          Çalkan Gülnahar, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01                          05/12/01

H46-867       19662          Çalkan Rabia, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01                               05/12/01

Section 3.b

H46-868       19663          Çapar Ekrem, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01                               05/12/01

H46-869       19664          Çelebi Hamdi, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01                               05/12/01

H46-870       19665          Çalkan Seyfettin, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01                          05/12/01

H46-871       19666          Çapar Nuri, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01                                   05/12/01

H46-872       19668          Dalgiç Hayrettin, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01                           05/12/01

H46-873       19669          Dalgiç Necati, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01                               05/12/01

H46-874       19670          Dişçi Dursun, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01                               05/12/01

H46-875       19671          Dişçi Hasan, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01                                 05/12/01

H46-876       19672          Dişçi Osman, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01                               05/12/01

H46-877       19673          Güneysu Davut, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01                            05/12/01

H46-878       19674          Kartal Ali, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01                                     05/12/01

H46-879       19675          Koç Hasan, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01                                  05/12/01

H46-880       19676          Koçer Ayse, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01                                 05/12/01

H46-881       19678          Öztürk Ali, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01                                    05/12/01

H46-882       19679          Öztürk Gülfiye, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01                             05/12/01

H46-883       19681          Öztürk Kamil, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01                                05/12/01

H46-884       19682          Öztürk Muhsin, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01                             05/12/01

H46-885       19683          Öztürk Mustafa, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01                            05/12/01

H46-886       19640          Akça Halim, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01                                  03/01/02

H46-887       19641          Akçay Mehmet, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01                            03/01/02

H46-888       19642          Akkaya Ahmet, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01                             03/01/02

H46-889       19643          Akkaya İbrahim, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01                            03/01/02

H46-890       19644          Akkaya Mustafa, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01                          03/01/02

H46-891       19645          Balci Hüseyin, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01                              03/01/02

H46-892       19646          Balci Macit, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01                                  03/01/02

H46-893       19647          Baltekin Bilge, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01                              03/01/02

H46-894       19648          Başar Halil, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01                                   03/01/02

H46-895       19649          Başar Talip, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01                                  03/01/02

H46-896       19650          Bilgin Ahmet, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01                                03/01/02

H46-897       19651          Bilgin Mahmut, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01                             03/01/02

H46-898       19652          Bilgin Mehmet II, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01                           03/01/02

H46-899       19653          Bilgiç Yusuf, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01                                03/01/02

H46-900       19654          Dinç Fethiye, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01                                03/01/02

H46-901       19655          Dokel Ünzile, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01                                03/01/02

H46-902       19656          Eğrikale Saadettin, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01                       03/01/02

H46-903       19657          Erol Naside II, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01                               03/01/02

H46-904       19658          Erol Recep, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01                                  03/01/02

H46-905       19659          Erol Sefer, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01                                   03/01/02

- 4 cases against the United Kingdom

H46-906       28883          McKerr, judgment of 04/05/01, final on 04/08/01[52]                                      04/11/01

H46-907       37715          Shanaghan, judgment of 04/05/01, final on 04/08/01[53]                                04/11/01

H46-908       24746          Hugh Jordan, judgment of 04/05/01, final on 04/08/01[54]                             04/11/01

H46-909       30054          Kelly and others, judgment of 04/05/01, final on 04/08/01[55]                        04/11/01

Table summarising the total number of cases by States

State	No confirmation of payment of the capital sum	No confirmation of payment of the capital sum although payment due since more than 6 months	Payment after expiration of the time-limit set and no confirmation of payment of the default interest due
Austria	6		1
Belgium			1
Cyprus	2
Finland	1
France	34	18	12
Greece	7		2
Italy	267	35[56]	281
Lithuania	1
Poland	4	6	1
Portugal	17	1	4
Romania	1		1
Slovenia	1
Turkey	27	48[57]	1
United Kingdom	5	4

List of cases for which late information on payment of just satisfaction has been provided

up to 2 December 2002

(819th meeting, 3 and 5 December 2002, Sections 2, 3 and 4)[58]

The information presented in the table below is the sole responsibility of the states concerned. Bearing in mind the date upon which this information was communicated to it, the Secretariat has not yet had the opportunity to check it. This will be done for the next meeting.

Liste d’affaires pour lesquelles des informations tardives sur le paiement de la satisfaction équitable ont été fournies jusqu’au 2 décembre 2002

(819e réunion, 3 et 5 décembre 2002, Rubriques 2, 3 et 4) ¹

Les informations présentées dans le tableau ci-dessous relèvent de la seule responsabilité des Etats concernés. Compte tenu de la date de la transmission de ces informations, le Secrétariat n’a pas encore eu l’occasion de les vérifier. Cette vérification sera effectuée pour la prochaine réunion.

Item / Point	State / Etat	Application / Requête	Case/ Affaire	Section / Rubrique	Judgment of / Arrêt du		Final on / Définitif le
H46-10	A	38237	Sailer	2		06/06/02	06/09/02
H46-15	CRO	53176	Mikulić	2		07/02/02	04/09/02
H46-69	NL	34549	Meulendijks	2		14/05/02	14/08/02
H46-74	POL	48001	Goc	2		16/04/02	16/07/02
H46-75	POL	29695	Gronuś	2		28/05/02	28/08/02
H46-93	SWE	30526	De Laczay Ervin & Olga	2		24/09/02	24/09/02
H46-124	A	50110	Maurer	3.a		17/01/02	17/04/02
H46-122	A	28525	Unabhängige Initiative Informationsvielfalt	3.a		26/02/02	26/05/02
H46-118	A	32636	A.T.	3.a		21/03/02	21/06/02
H46-120	A	34320	Freiheitliche Landesgruppe Burgenland	3.a		18/07/02	18/07/02
H46-127	CY	47293	Selim	3.a		16/07/02	16/07/02
H46-128	FIN	28856	Jokela	3.a		21/05/02	21/08/02
H46-729	LIT	48297	Butkevičius	3.a		26/03/02	26/06/02
H46-735	P	44872	Magalhães Pereira	3.a		26/02/02	26/05/02
H46-746	P	46462	Rego Chaves Fernandes	3.a		21/03/02	21/06/02
H46-737	P	48959	Azevedo Moreira	3.a		30/05/02	30/05/02
H46-750	P	48526	Viana Montenegro Carneiro	3.a		30/05/02	30/05/02
H46-732	POL	36250	Parciński	3.a		18/12/01	18/03/02
H46-759	TR	36590	Göç Mehmet	3.a		09/11/00	11/07/02
H46-760	TR	32985	Altan	3.a		14/05/02	14/05/02
H46-763	TR	26976+	Sürek Kamil Tekin V	3.a		16/07/02	16/07/02
H46-778	TR	27694	A.S.	3.a		28/03/02	28/03/02
H46-786	TR	33322	Özdiler et Bakan	3.a		27/06/02	27/06/02
H46-779	TR	38916	Atalağ	3.a		27/06/02	27/06/02
H46-770	TR	31136	Önder Yalçın	4.2		25/07/02	25/07/02

3.c               EXAMINATION OF SPECIAL PAYMENT PROBLEMS (FOR EXAMPLE THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THE APPLICANT, DISPUTES REGARDING THE EXACT AMOUNT PAID AS A RESULT OF EXCHANGE RATE PROBLEMS OR ADMINISTRATIVE FEES)

- 2 cases against Italy

H46-910       53708          Mas A. and 207 others, judgment of 07/06/01 – Friendly settlement

                                      Addendum General Questions

The case concerns the length of certain civil proceedings brought by haemophiliacs seeking compensation for damages suffered following blood transfusions infected with various viruses (complaints under Article 6§1). The proceedings in the present case are the same as those challenged in the cases A.B., E.F. and C.C. (Application No. 37874+, Interim Resolution DH(98)392), M.A. and 81 others (Application No. 44814+, Friendly settlement of 30/11/2000) and M.L. & 46 others (Application No. 53705, Friendly settlement of 5/04/2001).

Payment problems: The Court struck this case out of its list on the basis of a friendly settlement agreed between the parties according to which the Italian Government offered to pay to each of the 208 applicants certain sums, ranging from 5 000 000 Italian lire to 73 300 000 Italian lire (for a global sum of 9 687 800 000 Italian lire – see the detailed list available at the Registry of the Court) for non-pecuniary damages as well as, to all the applicants, the global sum of 80 000 000 Italian lire for costs and expenses. The payment took place between 5 and 9 November 2001, i.e. more than two months after the expiry of the time-limit set, namely the 7 September 2001. The payment of costs and expenses as well as of default interests due has not yet been made. A letter recalling the Committee of Ministers’ principles on payment of default interests was addressed to the Italian authorities on 30 January 2002.

Subsequently however, at the 783^rd meeting (February 2002), the question of the application of default interests in the supervision of the execution of friendly settlements was raised in other cases; the Deputies instructed therefore the Secretariat to prepare a document summarising the considerations to be taken into account concerning this issue and agreed to resume its consideration at their 792nd meeting (16, 17 and 19 (3 p.m.) April 2002). Having not found an agreement, the Deputies decided to reconsider the matter at their 798^th (June 2002), 803^rd (July 2002), 810^th (October 2002) and 819th (December 2002) meetings (DH) in the light of written contributions that the Delegations would send to the Secretariat (see General Questions, item e. andAddendum General Questions).

H46-911       53705          M.L. and 46 others, judgment of 05/04/01 – Friendly settlement

                                      Addendum General Questions

The case concerns the length of certain civil proceedings brought by haemophiliacs seeking compensation for damages suffered following blood transfusions infected with various viruses (complaints under Article 6§1). The proceedings in the present case are the same as those challenged in the cases A.B., E.F. and C.C. (Application No. 37874+, Interim Resolution DH(98)392), M.A. and 81 others (Application No. 44814+, Friendly settlement of 30/11/2000) and Mas. A. & 207 others (Application No. 53708, Friendly settlement of 07/06/2001).

Payment problems: The Court struck this case out of its list on the basis of a friendly settlement agreed between the parties according to which the Italian Government offered to pay to each of the 47 applicants certain sums, ranging from 15 000 000 Italian lire to 75 000 000 Italian lire (for a global sum of 1 910 000 000 Italian lire – see the detailed list available at the Registry of the Court) for non-pecuniary damages as well as, to all the applicants, the global sum of 20 000 000 Italian lire for costs and expenses. Although the Government had undertaken to pay these sums before 5 July 2001, the payment of costs and expenses has not yet been made, while the other sums were in fact paid between 11 and 13 September 2001, i.e. with a delay of more than two months. The Italian authorities have argued that no default interest is due because the friendly settlement did not include any clause on the subject: the applicants’ counsel has accordingly invited the Committee of Ministers to express its views on the lawfulness of such a position. At the 775^th meeting (December 2001), it was recalled that, according to the practice of the Committee of Ministers, the payment of default interest was due whenever the payment took place more than three months after the date at which the judgment became final. This also applies to friendly settlements, unless the parties have explicitly agreed different terms. A letter recalling these principles was addressed to the Italian authorities on 30 January 2002.

Section 3.c

Subsequently however, at the 783^rd meeting (February 2002), the question of the application of default interests in the supervision of the execution of friendly settlements was raised in other cases; the Deputies instructed therefore the Secretariat to prepare a document summarising the considerations to be taken into account concerning this issue and agreed to resume its consideration at their 792nd meeting (16, 17 and 19 (3 p.m.) April 2002). Having not found an agreement, the Deputies decided to reconsider the matter at their 798^th (June 2002), 803^rd (July 2002), 810^th (October 2002) and 819th (December 2002) meetings (DH) in the light of written contributions that the Delegations would send to the Secretariat (see General Questions, item e. andAddendum General Questions).

- 36 cases against Turkey

H46-912       28635+        Aksoy Ibrahim, judgment of 10/10/00, final on 10/01/01

H46-913       30947          Alpay, judgment of 27/02/01 – Friendly settlement

H46-914       26093+        B.T. and others, judgment of 14/11/00 – Friendly settlement

H46-915       28340          Büyükdağ, judgment of 21/12/00, final on 21/03/01

H46-916       25182+        Cankoçak, judgment of 20/02/01, final on 20/05/01

H46-917       25724          Cihan, judgment of 30/01/01 – Friendly settlement

H46-918       31963          Özel and others, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H46-919       26680          Şener, judgment of 18/07/00

H46-920       27697+        Yaşar and others, judgment of 14/11/00, final on 14/02/01

H46-921       19310          Yilmaz Hamit, judgment of 10/04/01, final on 10/07/01

H46-922       19308          Yilmaz Zekeriya, judgment of 10/04/01, final on 10/07/01

In these cases the applicants and/or the Secretariat have identified various problems relating to the payment of just satisfaction. These problems concern mostly more or less substantial shortfalls in payment, due among other things to currency conversion and/or delays in payment (default interest).

The Turkish authorities have undertaken to examine these problems with a view to settling the outstanding amounts due in accordance with the Court’s judgments. Information is awaited on the progress made to that effect.

H54-923       22729          Kaya Mehmet, judgment of 19/02/98

H54-924       21893          Akdivar, Çiçek, Aktaş, Karabulut, judgment of 16/09/96

H54-925       23178          Aydin, judgment of 25/09/97

H54-926       24276          Kurt, judgment of 25/05/98

H54-927       23818          Ergi, judgment of 28/07/98

H54-928       22495          Yaşa, judgment of 02/09/98

H46-929       23657          Çakici, judgment of 08/07/99

H46-930       23763          Tanrikulu, judgment of 08/07/99

H46-931       23144          Özgür Gündem, judgment of 16/03/00

H46-932       22535          Kaya Mahmut, judgment of 28/03/00

H46-933       22492          Kiliç, judgment of 28/03/00

H46-934       20764          Ertak Ismail, judgment of 09/05/00

H46-935       23531          Timurtaş, judgment of 13/06/00

H46-936       21986          Salman, judgment of 27/06/00 – Grand Chamber

H46-937       22277          Ilhan Nasir, judgment of 27/06/00

H32-938       23179+        Yilmaz, Ovat, Şahin and Dündar

H32-939       25658          Aslantaş Sedat, Interim Resolution DH(99)560 of 08/10/99

H46-940       22947+        Akkoç Nebahat, judgment of 10/10/00

H46-941       24396          Taş Beşir, judgment of 14/11/00

H46-942       23819          Bilgin İhsan, judgment of 16/11/00

Section 3.c

H46-943       22676          Gül Mehmet, judgment of 14/12/00

H46-944       25801          Dulaş Zubeyde, judgment of 30/01/01

H46-945       22493          Berktay, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-946       24490          Şarli, judgment of 22/05/01

H46-947       23954          Akdeniz and others, judgment of 31/05/01

In these 25 cases, the applicants, their representatives and the Secretariat have raised various problems relating to the payment of just satisfaction. These problems concern mostly more or less substantial shortfalls in payment. The total shortfall claimed by the applicants in these 25 cases amounts to more than 250 000 pounds sterling (including default interest).

During the examination of these cases in the Committee of Ministers, some concerns have been expressed about the comprehensive and persistent shortfalls in payment of just satisfaction and Turkey has been invited to remedy this problem urgently.

Following a bilateral meeting held in Strasbourg on 18/02/2002 between the Secretariat and a delegation from Ankara, the Turkish authorities’ presented in April 2002 their own calculations in each of the outstanding cases. In many cases the shortfalls acknowledged by the authorities coincide with the figures submitted by the applicants (including the default interest and restitution of a stamp duty erroneously deducted from the payments). However, in some of the cases the calculations differ notably as the payment was not effectuated as prescribed by the Court as regards the place and/or the currency of payment.

On 07/06/2002, the applicants’ representatives responded to the Governments’ calculations by maintaining and further substantiating the sums claimed.

Having examined the parties’ communications, the Secretariat has sent on 14/11/2002 a letter to the Turkish authorities inviting them to proceed to pay the 10 cases in which the shortfalls acknowledged by the authorities correspond to the sums dues. At the time of issuing the present annotated Agenda, the confirmation of payments was awaited.

The 15 other cases are still outstanding at the moment because, according to the information available, the shortfalls recognized by the Turkish authorities are lower than the sums due under the judgments of the Court.

The Secretariat continues its contacts with the authorities to provide some elements which would accelerate the payments in accordance with the judgments.

SECTION 4 - CASES RAISING SPECIFIC QUESTION
(INDIVIDUAL MEASURES, MEASURES NOT YET DEFINED OR SPECIAL PROBLEMS)

(See Addendum 4 for part or all these cases)

Action

The Deputies are invited to supervise the progress made in the adoption of the implementing measures in the following cases raising several problems. Supplementary information on some or all the cases listed below will be issued in Addendum 4. The Deputies are invited to resume consideration of these items on a case-by-case basis.

                   SUB-SECTION 4.1 – SUPERVISION OF INDIVIDUAL MEASURES ONLY[59]

- 2 cases against France

H46-949       37565          Sapl, judgment of 18/12/01, final on 18/03/02

The case concerns the excessive length of certain proceedings concerning civil rights and obligations before administrative courts (violations of Article 6§1). When the Court issued its judgment, the case had lasted 9 years, 4 months, from July 1992 to April 1998, and was still pending before the Administrative Court of Appeal of Lyon.

Possible individual measures: Accelerate the proceedings before the Administrative Court of appeal of Lyon.

H46-951       47160          Ezzouhdi, judgment of 13/02/01, final on 13/05/01

The case concerns the sentencing of the applicant, a Moroccan national, to permanent exclusion from French territory even though the offences he committed cannot be considered particularly serious, and given that the applicant has strong links with France but none with Morocco except for the mere fact of nationality (violation of Article 8).

Individual measures: The French authorities have indicated that the applicant had been placed on a compulsory residence order) by decision of 03/07/01. The applicant’s lawyer has lodged an application for rescission of the exclusion order (precondition for the delivery of a residence permit). A letter dated 28/08/02 was sent to the Delegation regarding the individual measures to be taken in favor of the applicant. The Delegation and the Secretariat remain in contact by correspondence concerning the development of this case.

- 1 case against Germany

H46-952       46544          Kutzner, judgment of 26/02/2002, final on 10/07/2002

The case concerns in particular the fact that decisions of German courts withdrawing the applicants’ parental authority in respect of their two daughters constituted interference in their right to respect for their family life (violation of Article 8). On 12 February 1997, the guardianship tribunal decided provisionally to withdraw the applicants' rights to choose where the children lived and to make decisions concerning the need for medical measures. At that time, the children were six and four years old. On 27 May 1997, the tribunal entirely withdrew the applicants' parental authority over their two children.

Individual measures: the German Government has informed the Committee that they are currently considering possible individual measures.

General measures: the judgment of the European Court has been published in the Europäische Grundrechte Zeitschrift (Volume 2002, pp. 244-251) and transmitted to all authorities concerned.

- 2 cases against Greece

H54-957       24348          Grigoriades, judgment of 25/11/97

H54-958       23372+        Larissis and others, judgment of 24/02/98

These cases concern various criminal convictions imposed on the applicants in violation of the Convention (violations of Articles 9 or 10).

Individual measures: the necessity to strike these convictions from the applicants’ criminal records has repeatedly been pointed out before the Committee of Ministers. Following the amendment of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which permits the reopening of national proceedings following violations found by the European Court (Article 525§5 as amended by Article 11 of Act No. 2865/19/12/2000), the Greek authorities indicated that the striking out of these convictions from the applicants’ criminal records could only be possible in future through re-opening the criminal proceedings in question. A request could be formulated for this purpose by the applicants as well as by the prosecutor. In the present cases, the possibility of reopening is being examined by the prosecutor. Further information is awaited.

Sub-section 4.1

- 2 cases against Poland

H46-961       29455          Pogorzelec, judgment of 17/07/01, final on 12/12/01

H46-962       35843          Malinowska, judgment of 14/12/00, final on 14/03/01

These two cases concern the excessive length of certain civil proceedings, apparently still pending before domestic courts (violations of Article 6§1).

Individual measures: At the 757th (June 2001) and 783rd (February 2002) meetings, the Polish authorities were invited to take measures with a view to accelerating the impugned proceedings. On 22/04/2002, the Secretariat received a letter from the applicant in the Pogorzelec case complaining that the proceedings in his case were still pending at the domestic level. At the time of issuing the present annotated Agenda no information with regard to the present state of the impugned proceedings was available.

- 5 cases against Portugal

H46-966       35593          Galinho Carvalho Matos, judgment of 23/11/99, final on 23/02/00

The case concerns the excessive length of certain compensation proceedings before civil courts. The case was still pending before the Almada Court when the European Court issued its judgment and had already lasted seven years and six months, from 18 May 1992 to November 1999 (violation of Article 6§1).

Individual measures: Accelerating the proceedings still pending before the Almada Court.

H46-963       37010          Conde, judgment of 23/03/00, final on 23/06/00

H46-964       47459          Fernandes João, judgment of 18/04/2002, final on 18/07/2002

H46-965       36668          Fertiladour S.A., judgment of 18/05/00, final on 18/08/00

H46-967       42918          Nascimento, judgment of 27/09/01, final on 27/12/01

These cases concern the excessive length of civil proceedings (4 years and 7 months, still pending before the Court of Portimão when the European Court delivered its judgment in the first case; 9 years and 9months, still pending before the Loures Court when the European Court delivered its judgment in the second case; more than 13 years, still pending before the Court of Mangualde when the European Court issued its judgment in the third case; 14 years and 7 months, still pending before the court of appeal of Porto when the Court issued its judgment in the fourth case) (violations of Article 6§1).

Individual measures: The Committee has asked whether the proceedings are still pending before the Courts of Portimão, Loures, Mangualde and Porto.

- 3 cases against the United Kingdom

H54-968       19187          Saunders, judgment of 17/12/96, Interim Resolution DH(2000)27

H46-969       29522+        I.J.L., G.M.R. and A.K.P., judgment of 19/09/00

These cases concern the violation of the applicants’ right not to incriminate themselves and thus their right to a fair trial in that, at their trials, the prosecution made use of statements given earlier, under legal compulsion and in different proceedings, to Department of Trade and Industry Inspectors (violations of Article 6§1). After the Deputies had decided, on the basis of the information available at the time, to mandate the Secretariat to draft a resolution with a view to closing the examination of the first case, a complaint dated 15/04/2002 was received from the applicants to the effect that they have so far been unable to obtain redress.

Individual measures: The applicants complain in particular of certain obstacles recently encountered in the proceedings they have engaged in order to have their convictions re-examined and overturned following the European Court’s judgments. They request the Committee to adjourn the examination of their cases until these domestic proceedings have concluded.

Sub-section 4.1

In support of their request, the applicants make a number of points, including the following:

Following the European Court’s judgments, their case was referred to the Court of Appeal for new examination by the Criminal Cases Review Commission, as the latter had found that there was a real possibility that the Court of Appeal might not uphold the convictions because of the decisions of the European Court.

However, while their case was pending before the Court of Appeal, the House of Lords held in another case concerning a situation which had not been brought before the European Court, that the right to rely on Convention rights in any legal proceedings guaranteed by the Human Rights Act did not have retroactive effect (i.e. before 02/10/2000). In a subsequent judgment, also adopted while the proceedings before the Court of Appeal in the present cases were pending, the House of Lords reached the opposite conclusion but found that, in the interest of judicial certainty, the erroneous construction in its first judgment should not be overturned.

In its decision of 21/12/2001, the Court of Appeal notably indicated “that…if we concluded that we were bound to give effect to the Strasbourg Court’s decision that the trial was unfair by examining anew the safety of the convictions, we would not uphold the convictions on the basis that they are safe in any event” (§47). However, the Court of Appeal did not find itself so bound under Article 46 of the Convention (especially §§50‑53). Neither did it uphold any other ground of appeal. Accordingly, it concluded that the convictions were safe and dismissed the appeal (§86). The applicants sought leave to appeal to the House of Lords.

On 11/02/2002, the Court of Appeal certified that the appeal raised a point of law of general public importance, namely whether the House of Lords decision not to give retroactive effect to the Human Rights Act also covers the situation where the United Kingdom is under the obligation by virtue of Article 46 of the Convention to abide by the European Court’s judgment. On 09/03/2002, the House of Lords granted leave to appeal. The applicants indicate that the case is listed for hearing on 09/10/2002.

At the 798^th meeting (June 2002) the Representative of the United Kingdom objected to the applicants’ request for an adjournment, referring notably to the following considerations: the authorities have done all that was required by the Court’s judgment (payment of just satisfaction and legislative reform to prevent recurrence of the violations found). Even if reopening of proceedings is a desirable measure in certain circumstances, the Convention does not require such a measure in all circumstances, and in particular not in respect of cases such as the applicants’. No question had indeed been raised before in these cases regarding any necessity of reopening the proceedings. Moreover, a requirement to reopen or to quash the applicants’ convictions could risk opening the floodgates to reopening requests in respect of cases in which there had been, or might have been, a violation of a Convention right at trial many years ago, something that would risk undermining the “controlled introduction” of the Convention rights into domestic law achieved through the Human Rights Act. Furthermore, the adjournment request appeared primarily to be an attempt to bolster the arguments run domestically. If the appeal failed, this might, however, possibly give raise to an allegation of a fresh violation of the Convention. Such a complaint should, however, be pursued through the ordinary procedure before the European Court. In conclusion the Representative urged the Committee to agree to the closure of the cases.

At the 810th meeting (October 2002), the Deputies decided not to close the cases but to pursue their examination and to resume consideration of the discussion at their 819th meeting (December 2002) with a view to examining the individual measures to be taken, in the light of the outcome of the proceedings pending before the House of Lords.

General measures: The legislative amendments announced in Interim Resolution DH(2000)27 have been adopted.

H46-970       36533          Atlan A. and T., judgment of 19/06/01, final on 19/09/01

The case concerns the absence of a fair trial in that, in criminal proceedings against the applicants, the prosecution repeatedly denied the existence of evidence pertinent to a central issue of the defence and, without the knowledge or approval of the judge, decided that this evidence should not be disclosed to the judge or to the defence (violation of Article 6§1).

The case presents similarities to that of Rowe and Davis against the United Kingdom (judgment of 16/02/2000), closure of which is proposed following the adoption of general measures by the United Kingdom.

Individual measures: At the 775^th meeting (November 2001) the Government was asked whether this case would be reviewed by the Criminal Cases Review Board as in the Rowe and Davis case. Information on this issue is awaited.

                   SUB-SECTION 4.2 – INDIVIDUAL MEASURES AND/OR GENERAL PROBLEMS

- 2 cases against Austria

H46-973       38536          Schreder, judgment of 13/12/01, final on 13/03/02[60]

H46-974       32899          Buchberger, judgment of 20/12/01, final on 20/03/02

The case concerns a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her family life in that, in 1994, during appeal proceedings, the Regional Court transferred custody of her sons to the Youth Welfare Office, relying on fresh evidence which had not been communicated to the applicant, depriving her of the possibility to react to it and have a sufficient involvement in the decision-making process (violation of Article 8). This fact also constitutes a violation of the principle of equality of arms (violation of Article 6§1).

Individual measures: In a letter dated 10/07/2002, the Government indicated to the Directorate General of Human Rights that the judicial decision concerning the transfer of the children’s custody to the Youth Welfare Office was not subject to revision. However, if there are new facts, the applicant may seize the court to request a new decision.

General measures: The Government stated in the same letter that the principle of equality of arms is fully implemented in proceedings concerning the custody of children which are conducted on a non-contentious basis.

- 2 cases against Cyprus

H46-975       30873          Egmez, judgment of 21/12/00

                                      Addendum 4, Volume 1

The case mainly concerns the inhuman treatment inflicted upon the applicant by state officials during his arrest before being admitted to hospital in Larnaca (violation of Article 3) and the absence of an effective remedy in this respect (violation of Article 13). On 01/12/1995, the Attorney General filed at the Nicosia District Court a nolle prosequi in the applicant’s case, in accordance with Article 113.2 of the Constitution. The applicant was released on the same day. On 04/12/1995, the Nicosia District Court discharged the applicant.

Individual measures: The applicant’s lawyer sent a letter to the Secretariat on 19/04/2001 raising several questions about the need to adopt individual measures in this case. In May 2001 the Secretariat forwarded a copy of the letter to the Cypriot authorities. The latter confirmed that they were presently examining the measures that might need to be taken in respect of this case and indicated that the Secretariat would be kept informed in written form of any development in this field.

On 26/09/2002, the Secretariat received a letter from the applicant’s lawyer requesting among other things precise information about the measures presently under examination by the Cypriot authorities. He also requested information as to whether the Attorney-General had instituted criminal proceedings against the officers involved and, if that is not the case, what reasons had been given. Finally, he requested that a copy of his letter be made available to all the Deputies (see Addendum 4, volume 1).

General measures: As in the Denizci & others case, also examined under section 4.2, the Cypriot authorities have informed the Committee of Ministers that the judgment of the European Court was disseminated to all institutions concerned (judicial and also police/security forces, Attorney General’s Office, Ombudsman, Cyprus Bar Association). The Ministry of Justice and Ministry of the Interior have requested that appropriate instructions be prepared and distributed to all state officials in order to avoid any future cases of ill-treatment. Instructions prepared by the Attorney General have also been distributed to all authorities concerned. Finally, the judgment has received extensive media coverage in Cyprus. Information about its publication has been requested.

Furthermore, sections 242-243 of the Criminal Code and related parts of the Code of Criminal Procedure have been amended taking into account the findings of the European Court. However, further legislative measures are envisaged. The Cypriot authorities have transmitted to the Secretariat, in written form, details of the above-mentioned information in Greek. An English summary was also transmitted to the Secretariat on 04/10/2002 (see Addendum 4, volume 1).

Sub-section 4.2

The Committee has asked, whether, as far as the violation of Article 13 is concerned and in the light of §§71 and 99 of the Court’s judgment, the Cypriot authorities envisage the adoption of specific measures in order to guarantee that similar violations do not recur.

On 31 October 2002, a bilateral meeting took place between the Cypriot Delegation and the Secretariat. At the meeting, the Secretariat has signalled the issues for which clarifications are needed, and has requested to have this, if possible, in time for the examination of the Egmez and Denizci cases at the 819th meeting.

H46-976       25316+        Denizci and others, judgment of 23/05/01, final on 23/08/01

                                      Addendum 4, volume 1

The case concerns in particular the fact that the applicants (and in the case of the ninth applicant, her son) were subjected to ill-treatment considered inhuman by the European Court (violation of Article 3), that they have been victims of unlawful arrest and detention (violation of Article 5§1) and that they have been subjected to restrictions on their freedom of movement (violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 4).

Individual measures: The Cypriot authorities have stated that the applicants were released from detention. The Committee has asked whether the investigation proceedings, which started in 1995, are still open (§23 of the judgment of the European Court).

General measures: The Cypriot authorities have informed the Committee of Ministers that the judgment of the European Court was disseminated to all institutions concerned (judicial and also the police force/security forces, the Attorney General’s Office, the Ombudsman, the Cyprus Bar Association). The Ministry of Justice and Ministry of the Interior have requested that appropriate instructions be prepared and distributed to all State officials in order to avoid any future cases of ill-treatment. Instructions prepared by the Attorney General have also been distributed to all authorities concerned. Finally, the judgment has received extensive media coverage in Cyprus. Exact references as to its publication and the dissemination have been requested. The Cypriot authorities have transmitted to the Secretariat, in written form, details of the above-mentioned information in Greek.

Furthermore, sections 242-243 of the Criminal Code and related parts of the code of criminal proceedings were already amended taking into account the findings of the European Court. However, further legislative measures are envisaged. An English summary was also transmitted to the Secretariat on 04/10/2002 (see Addendum 4, volume 1).

On 30 October 2002, a bilateral meeting took place between the Cypriot Delegation and the Secretariat. At the meeting, the Secretariat has identified the issues for which clarifications are needed, and has requested to have this, if possible, in time for the examination of the Egmez and Denizci cases at the 819th meeting.

- 4 cases against Croatia

H46-977       54727          Cerin, judgment of 15/11/01, final on 15/02/02

H46-978       52634          Futterer, judgment of 20/12/01, final on 20/03/02

H46-979       51585          Horvat, judgment of 26/07/01, final on 26/10/01

H46-980       49706          Rajak, judgment of 28/06/01, final on 12/12/01

These cases concern the excessive length of certain civil proceedings which lasted more than 17, 11, 6 and 25 years respectively. The Court’s jurisdiction, taking into account the date of Croatia’s accession to the Convention, extends respectively to 3 years and 11 months; 3 years and 10 months; 3 years and 8 months, and 3 years and 7 months (violations of Article 6§1). When the Court delivered its judgments, the cases were still pending at first instance.

The Horvat case also concerns the lack of an effective remedy in domestic law, since the formal institution of proceedings upon a complaint lodged with the Constitutional Court depended on the discretion of the latter (violation of Article 13).

Individual measures: In the Rajak case the proceedings have been ended by a final judgment of 25/09/2002 of the Rijeka County Court. In the other cases the proceedings are still pending. Further information is awaited.

Sub-section 4.2

General measures: The judgments of the European Court have already been translated, and disseminated to domestic courts. They have also been published on the official Internet site of the Government www.vlada.hr/dokumenti.html and in legal journals of wide distribution, such as the bulletin of the Association of Croatian Judges, Sudac (“The judge”), N° 5/2001, Informator, No. 5022/20/09/2002 and Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Zagrebu (Collection works of the Faculty of Law in Zagreb), N° 3-4 2002 (accompanied by comments).

As regards the violation of Article 13, a new Act amending the Constitutional Act on the Constitutional Court entered into force on 15/03/2002. It introduced a new Section 59(a), which subsequently became Section 63 of the 2002 Constitutional Act on the Constitutional Court. This Section provides inter alia that the Constitutional Court must examine a constitutional complaint even before all legal remedies have been exhausted, in cases where a competent court has not decided within a reasonable time a claim concerning the applicant’s rights and obligations, or a criminal charge against him. If the Constitutional Court finds the complaint well-founded it must set a time-limit for deciding the case on the merits and it shall also award compensation for the excessive length of proceedings. In the Radoš case (judgment of 07/11/2002) and in the admissibility decisions in the cases Jeftić, Plaftak and others, Nogolica and Slaviček, (Applications Nos. 57576/00, 76687/01, 77784/01 and 20862/02 respectively), the Court found that this new Section provided an effective remedy in respect of complaints concerning excessive length of proceedings.

As regards the violation of Article 6§1, a reform of the Act on Civil Procedure is under way. The relevant draft law sets out to reconstruct the system on new principles (adjudication of cases by a single judge as a general rule, limitation of the ex officio conduct of the evidence procedure, obligation to present evidence and facts at preliminary hearings, principle of perpetuation of jurisdiction, limitation of the competence of the court of appeal to decide only on the questions raised by the appeal, stricter conditions for the use of extraordinary legal remedies). It also aims to prevent the abuse of procedural rights and strengthen procedural discipline (broader imposition of fines for procedural abuses, imposition of costs and expenses on the basis of the culpability principle without right to appeal, delivery of judgments by default when defendants do not respond to the complaint within the time-limit). The courts’ comments on this draft are currently being studied by the Ministry of Justice. Further information concerning progress with this draft is awaited.

- 1 case against the Czech Republic

H46-981       33071          Malhous, judgment of 12/07/01 - Grand Chamber

The case concerns an infringement of the applicant’s right to a public hearing before an independent and impartial tribunal in the context of certain proceedings for recovery of possessions (violation of Article 6§1).

General measures: At the 783rd meeting (March 2002) the Czech authorities were invited to give information concerning the amendment of Article 21 of the Code of Civil Procedure concerning the public nature of hearings before land boards. Information concerning the publication of the judgment of the European Court is also excepted.

- 25 cases against France

H46-982       34000          DuRoy and Malaurie, judgment of 03/10/00, final on 03/01/01

The case concerns an infringement of the freedom of expression of the applicants, who are journalists, because of their conviction on 1996, for crime of “publishing information regarding civil action in criminal proceedings” based on Article 2 of the Law dated 2 july 1931 (Violation of Article 10).

Individual measures: No step to collect the applicants’ fine has been taken. Information concerning the possibility of erasing the convictions from the applicants’ criminal records is awaited.

General measures: a change in the law is anticipated. In the meantime, the Cour de cassation has, in judgments dated on 16/01/2001 and 27/03/2001, set aside the application of Article 2 of the Law of 2 July 1931, which is considered contrary to Article 10 of the Convention.

Sub-section 4.2

H46-984       36436          Piron, judgment of 14/11/00, final on 14/02/01

The case concerns the excessive length of certain proceedings concerning civil rights and obligations regarding consolidation of parcels of land, before administrative courts. When the Court issued its judgment, these proceedings had already lasted, for the purposes of the Convention, 26 years, 5 months and were still pending (violation of Article 6§1).

The case also concerns an infringement of the applicant’s right to the peaceful enjoyment of her possessions, as she had been deprived of a part of her property in consequence of the same proceedings, without obtaining adequate compensation (i.e. for being deprived of her property and for damages resulting from the length of this privation) within a reasonable time (violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1).

Individual measures: It has been suggested, since the first examination of the case at the 749th meeting (April 2001), that a particular attention be paid to closing the case at national level (the proceedings lasted 26 years and 5 months for the purposes of the Convention, but actually more than 35 years). At the 764th meeting (September 2001), the Representative of France stated that the case was pending before the Conseil d’Etat. The judgment of the European Court recalls that it was for national tribunals to evaluate the material damage. By a letter dated 13/06/2002, the Representative of France stated that the case was still pending before the Conseil d’Etat because the applicant was not satisfied with the sum proposed by the competent authority (Commission d’aménagement foncier).

General measures: Information has been requested concerning the running and the workload of commissions responsible for consolidating parcels of land.

H46-985       39288          Association Ekin, judgment of 17/07/01, final on 17/10/01

The case concerns an infringement of the freedom of expression of the applicant (a Basque association) in that Section 14 of the Law of 29 July 1881as amended, which empowers the Minister of the Interior to ban the publication of a foreign publication, was applied to one of its books (violation of article 10). The case also concerns the length (9 years, 1 month, 5 days) of the civil proceedings before administrative courts aiming at quashing the Minister of the Interior’s decree (violation of Article 6§1).

Individual measures: by a judgement of the Conseil d’Etat dated 9 July 1997, the Minister of the Interior’s decree banning the publication was quashed.

General measures: By a letter dated 13 June 2002, the Delegation indicated that the judgment of the European Court had been widely publicised in public administration journals and that since the Court judgment, no more individual decisions had been taken concerning a foreign publication. A legislative change to Article 14 of the Law of 29^th July 1881 is anticipated.

H46-986       24846+        Zielinski and Pradal and Gonzalez and others, judgment of 28/10/99 – Grand

                                      Chamber

The case concerns the violation of the applicants’ right to a fair trial on account of the adoption of an Act determining the mode of calculation of an allowance to be paid to staff of social security offices of the départements of Haut-Rhin, Bas-Rhin and Moselle, whereas judicial proceedings regarding the same question were still pending (violation of Article 6§1). The case also concerns the length of certain of these proceedings (violation of Article 6§1).

Special measures: In reply to a question from the Secretariat, the French Delegation indicated, in July 2000, that the people who had instituted legal proceedings by the time the Act had been passed had lodged an application for compensation to the Secrétariat général du Gouvernement, and that this application was rejected. By a letter dated 13 June 2002, the delegation indicated that the rejection pronounced by the Administrative Tribunal of Strasbourg was based on the fact that the application should have been introduced before the social security authorities (caisses de sécurité sociale). The proceedings are still pending before the Administrative Court of Appeal and information is awaited concerning their outcome.

Sub-section 4.2

H46-992       29507          Slimane-Kaid II, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 17/05/00[61]

The case concerns an infringement of the principle of equality of arms and of the right to a fair trail during proceedings before the Criminal Chamber of the Cour de cassation (violation of Article 6§1) in that it ruled on an appeal lodged by the applicant without communicating either the report of the conseiller rapporteur or the conclusions of the Advocate General to the applicant or to his lawyer, neither of which could therefore answer them.

Individual measures: It is recalled that the applicant has the possibility, under Articles 626-1 to 626-7 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to ask for the re-examination of his case.

General measures: The issue regarding the communication of the conseiller rapporteur’s report has been raised and a letter recalling that general measures are expected in this case was sent to the Representation on 9 August 2000. The Delegation indicated in December 2000 that thought was being given to this subject within the Cour de cassation. Information concerning the measures taken is awaited.

H46-993       27362          Voisine, judgment of 08/02/00

H46-130       32911+        Meftah, Adoud and Bosoni, judgment of 26/07/2002 - Grand Chamber[62]

These cases concern the unfairness of certain proceedings before the Cour de cassation. The applicants chose to defend themselves rather than be represented by a member of the Cour de cassation Bar. Consequently, they did not benefit from the practice – reserved to members of the Cour de cassation Bar – according to which the content of the Advocate General’s submissions are transmitted to defendants’ counsel, assuming they are members of the Cour de cassation bar, who thus have the opportunity to reply in written form to the court when it is deliberating. Given the nature of the submissions in this case and of what was at stake for the applicants in the proceedings, their right to adversarial proceedings was infringed (violation of Article 6§1).

General measures: The publication of the judgment of the European Court and its dissemination to civil courts are awaited. The Secretariat has suggested that measures should be taken in order to permit applicants who have chosen, as authorised by domestic law, to defend themselves without assistance, to obtain the content of the conclusions of the Advocate General and to have the opportunity to reply in written form to the court when it is deliberating. Information on measures to be adopted by the authorities are awaited.

                   - Cases of length of proceedings before the Conseil d’Etat

H46-994       36932          Caillot, judgment of 04/06/99, final on 04/09/99

H46-995       38249          Arvois, judgment of 23/11/99, final on 23/02/00

H46-996       28660          Ballestra, judgment of 12/12/00, final on 12/03/01

H46-997       33207          Blaisot C. and M., judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00

H46-998       42401          Camps, judgment of 24/10/00, final on 09/04/01

H46-157       54757          Chaufour, judgment of 19/03/02, final on 19/06/02[63]

H46-989       41449          Durrand I, judgment of 13/11/01, final on 13/02/02

H46-990       42038          Durrand II, judgment of 13/11/01, final on 13/02/02

H46-999       38945          Francisco, judgment of 13/11/01, final on 13/02/02

H46-797       30979          Frydlender, judgment of 27/06/00[64]

H46-158       48205+        Gentilhomme, Schaff-Benhadji and Zerouki, judgment of 14/05/2002, final on 14/08/2002[65]

H46-1000     44066          Grass, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01

H46-1001     41001          Joseph-Gilbert Garcia, judgment of 26/09/00, final on 26/12/00

H46-1002     37387          Lambourdiere, judgment of 02/08/00, final on 02/11/00

Sub-section 4.2

H46-159       39996          Ouendeno, judgment of 16/04/2002, final on 10/07/2002[66][67]

H32-799       32510          Peter[68]

H46-1003     33989          Thery, judgment of 01/02/00, final on 01/05/00

H46-798       38042          Zanatta, A. and J.-B., judgment of 28/03/00, final on 28/06/00[69]

These cases concerns the excessive length of certain proceedings concerning civil rights and obligations before the administrative courts and particularly before the Conseil d’Etat (violations of Articon 6§1).

General measures: the Committee of Ministers is regularly called upon to examine cases of length of proceedings before the Conseil d’Etat. The Vice-President of the Conseil d’Etat himself confirmed the problems of this court. He declared at the Plenary General Assembly in June 1999 that the average time for judging a case was more than three years and that this situation “could not be tolerated for long by [his] fellow citizens”. The French authorities were asked whether they were contemplating measures in favour of the Conseil d’Etat and whether the plan to reinforce administrative courts, described in Resolution DH(95)254 (adopted in the case of Beaumartin against France) had been carried out.

The Delegation of France sent a memorandum to the Secretariat summing up the main measures taken to reduce the length of proceedings before administrative courts. This document contains information on the increase of personnel and material resources for administrative courts as well as procedural reforms aiming at accelerating the judgment of applications. However this memorandum does not specify whether particular measures have been taken recently, or will be taken in the near future, in favour of the Conseil d’Etat. By letter of 28/08/2000, the Delegation was requested to provide further information.

In June 2002, the Delegation transmitted part of the Conseil d’Etat’s activity report for 2001. It contains some encouraging indications (slight decrease of the number of cases and of the average length of proceedings) but also some showing that the problem of length of proceedings before the Conseil d’Etat still exists. The report identifies the causes of some of the delays and recommends solutions. The report could usefully serve as a basis for the French authorities’ reflexions on possible general measures.

- 4 cases against Greece

H46-1004     40907          Dougoz, judgment of 06/03/01, final on 06/06/01

The case concerns the conditions of the applicant’s detention in 1997, in the Alexandras Police Headquarters and the Drapetzona detention centre, which in the European Court’s view amounted to degrading treatment (violation of article 3). The case also concerns the fact that the applicant’s detention pending expulsion was not in accordance with a procedure “prescribed by law” within the meaning of the Court’s case-law (violation of Article 5§1). Finally, the case concerns the fact that the domestic legal system did not afford the applicant an opportunity to have the lawfulness of his detention pending expulsion determined by a national court (violation of Article 5§4).

General measures: The judgment of the European Court was translated, published on the official internet site of the Legal Council of the State (www.nsk.gr) and disseminated to the Police General Directorates.

As to the violation of Article 3, the improvements carried out as regards the conditions of detention in Alexandras and in Drapetzona, and the measures still to be taken are set out in the last report of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT), published on 13/09/2001, following its visit to these centres in 1999, as well as in the Government’s reply (see CM/Del/OJ/OT(2001)775, section 4.2). In order to remedy overcrowding, three new detention centres for aliens are already in service and another is under construction. A project to construct or renovate centres in all Police Directorates is under way. New legislation has been adopted stating that aliens must be detained in specific places in police stations, operating under specific terms and that detention pending

Sub-section 4.2

expulsion of aliens by administrative order must not last more than three months (Articles 44§3 & 48 of the Act 2910/02/05/2001). As regards, in particular, the situation in Alexandras and in Drapetzona, the Government indicates in a document dated 27/02/2002, that the number of persons detained rarely exceeds the total capacity and that the recommendations of the CPT concerning hygiene and cleanliness rules, ventilation, etc. (see § 59 of the judgment and §§ 19-20 of the report) are met. Information is awaited concerning the possibility of a regime of activities in the existing centres and the timetable of construction of specific centres for the detention of aliens.

As regards the violation of Article 5§§1&4, the Government indicates that Article 44§8 of Act 2910/02/05/2001 authorises the Ministers of Internal Affaires, of Justice, of Public Order and of Foreign Affairs to adopt a rule concerning the execution of expulsions ordered by courts. A copy of the text of these rules is awaited.

H46-1005     28524          Peers, judgment of 19/04/01

The case concerns the conditions of the applicant’s detention in 1994, in Koridallos prison, which amounted to degrading treatment in the Court’s view (violation of article 3). The case also concerns the opening by the prison administration of letters addressed to him by the Secretariat of the former European Commission of Human Rights, a measure considered by the Court as unnecessary in a democratic society (violation of Article 8).

General measures: The judgment of the European Court was translated, published on the official internet site of the Legal Council of the State (www.nsk.gr) and disseminated to prisons.

As regards the violation of Article 3, the Government indicated that, following the facts of the present case, Greece adopted new legislation (Acts n° 2298/04/04/1995, n° 2408/04/06/1996 and n° 2776/24/12/1999) aimed at the improvement of prison policy and of the conditions of detention (for the details see CM/Del/OJ/OT(2001)775, 4.2, p. 78).

As regards the situation in Koridallos prison, the improvements carried out and the measures still to be taken are described in the last report of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT), published on 13.09.2001, following its visit to Koridallos in 1999, as well as in the Government’s reply. The CPT found that the situation had improved. It noted however, that nothing had changed in the segregation unit of D wing which is concerned in this case (for the details see CM/Del/OJ/OT(2001)775, 4.2, p. 78). The Government replied that, in order to remedy the problem of overcrowding, a new programme concerning the construction of ten new prisons and two centres for drug-addicted detainees was under way. In addition, two new units of modern construction were ready in the prisons of Nafplion and Mandarino (p. 111-112 of the reply). Information concerning the timetable of this project and the improvement in the segregation unit of D wing is awaited.

As regards the violation of Article 8, the Greek representation indicated to the Committee of Ministers, during the 757th meeting (04-05/12/2001), that Article 19 §§ 1, 2 of the Constitution (as amended in April 2001) authorises the legislator to establish an independent authority competent to ensure the respect of correspondence and that Article 53 of the Act n° 2776/1999 provides particularly for the protection of this right of prisoners. Further information on these issues is awaited.

H46-1006     44584          Tsironis, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02

The case concerns a disproportionate limitation on the applicant’s right of access to a court in that the national courts dismissed as out of time his application for annulment of the sale by auction of his land, requested by a creditor bank, although the notification of the act deciding the sale was void (violation of Article 6§1). This situation and the fact that the applicant had only recently come to an agreement with the bank, constitute a disproportionate deprivation of his property (violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1).

General measures: The judgment was published on the official internet site of the State Legal Council (www.nsk.gr) and disseminated to civil courts. At the 798^th meeting (June 2002), the Government was asked whether it envisaged legislative measures to ensure that the respect of the time-limit for annulment of a sale by auction (Article 934 of the Code of civil procedure) requires that the injured party has effectively been informed about the act deciding the sale so that he can challenge it.

Sub-section 4.2

H46-1007     47730          Entreprises Meton and Etep, judgment of 21/03/2002, final on 21/06/2002

The case concerns the excessive length of certain civil proceedings (more than 9 years, of which 5 years for the hearing of three witnesses). When the European Court delivered its judgment the proceedings were still pending before the court of first instance.

The case presents similarities, in particular, to those of Academy Trading Ltd (judgment of 04/04/2000) and LSI Information Technologies (judgment of 20/12/01) which appear in section 6 following a number of general measures already adopted.

General measures: The judgment of the European Court was published on the official Internet site of the State Legal Council (www.nsk.gr) and disseminated to civil courts. At the 810^th meeting (October 2002), the Government was requested to provide information about the measures envisaged in order to ensure a reasonable length of evidence proceedings. Information on this issue is awaited.

- 2 cases against Ireland

H46-1008     36887          Quinn, judgment of 21/12/00, final on 21/03/01

H46-1009     34720          Heaney and McGuinness, judgment of 21/12/00, final on 21/03/01

These cases concern in particular the failure to respect the applicants’ right to remain silent and not to incriminate themselves (violation of Article 6§1) and the consequent breach of the presumption of their innocence (violation of Article 6§2). The applicants, remanded in custody on suspicion of having committed terrorist acts, were initially informed by the police that they had the right to remain silent. However, charges subsequently laid against them included that of refusing to answer questions under the terms of Article 52 of the 1939 Offences against the State Act. In the subsequent criminal proceedings, they were found not guilty of the substantive charges but convicted and sentenced (June 1991 in the Heaney & McGuinness case, and May 1997 in the Quinn case) to six months’ imprisonment for having refused to answer questions while on remand, under the terms of the above-mentioned Article 52.

Individual measures: the Secretariat has requested information on any individual measure envisaged e.g. the deletion of the conviction or, at least, the annotation of the records with the conclusion of the judgment of the European Court in the applicants’ criminal records.

The applicant in the Quinn case has brought proceedings, which are pending before the High Court, seeking inter alia to have his conviction quashed. As regards the Heaney & McGuinness case, the Court of Criminal Appeal has not received any communication from the applicants’ solicitors with a view to taking any procedural steps necessary to determine the appeal. Information as to the outcome of the proceedings at the domestic level in the Quinn case has been requested.

General measures: the Irish authorities have informed the Committee of Ministers that under the Good Friday Peace Agreement of 10 April 1998, reforms of the Offences against the State Act 1939 are envisaged. In this respect the Minister of Justice, Equality and Law Reform has established a committee to examine all aspects of the 1939 Acts and to report to the Minister with recommendations for reform. The final report of the Review Group on the 1939 Offences Against the State Act was submitted to the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law reform at the beginning of 2002. A copy of the Report was submitted to the Secretariat in August 2002. In Chapter VIII of the Report (pp 183 to 212), the problems raised under the Quinn and Heaney & McGuinness cases have been extensively examined by the committee, which has recommended, inter alia, that section 52 of the 1939 Act and section 2 of the 1972 Act (having amended the 1939 Act) the be repealed. The Committee of Ministers has asked to be kept informed of any development in this field, in particular whether following the recommendations of the review committee, the Irish authorities envisaged the introduction of amendments to the existing legislation. Finally, the judgments of the European Court are now accessible on the Irish Courts Service website (www.courts.ie) and are also available in legal libraries.

- 14 cases against Italy

H32-1010     26426          S.B.F. S.p.a., Interim Resolution DH(97)599

The case concerns the right of access to a court in order to obtain an adjudication of culpable bankruptcy. According to Italian law, adjudication must take place within one year from the cessation of the debtor’s activities. As the competent court (special bankruptcy section) did not give its ruling within the deadline, the applicant company lost the opportunity to recover its financial claims by judicial means (violation of Article 6§1).

Sub-section 4.2

General measures: The confirmation of the publication of the report of the former European Commission is awaited. At the 732nd meeting (December 2000), the Government indicated that a legislative reform was under way. At the 803rd meeting (July 2002), they were of the opinion that the measures adopted in order to prevent violations of excessive length of proceedings were sufficient and that no other measure was required. However, it was indicated to the Government that, in the present case, the non-respect of the legal deadline in the bankruptcy proceedings had deprived the applicant company of its right of access to justice. Therefore, the Government was invited to provide information about the measures envisaged in order to ensure the effectiveness of the legal system.

H32-1011     26774          A.D., Interim Resolution DH(98)208

The case concerns the excessive length of certain criminal proceedings against the applicant, (11 years and 9 months from 1982 to 1994) (violation of Article 6§1). The Commission and the Committee of Ministers also concluded that the prolonged seizure of the applicant’s fees resulting from the length of such proceedings as well as the retention of a large sum, exceeding the actual debt of the applicant after the execution of the sentence had taken place, had infringed the applicant’s right to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions (violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1).

General measures: The Commission’s report was transmitted to the judicial authority concerned and it was also published in the revue Documenti di Giustizia , n° 4, 2000.

With reference to paragraph 33 of the Commission’s report, indicating that the Milan Appeal Court had omitted to decide on the applicant’s request to recover the contested sums, the Director General of human rights asked, in a letter of 03/12/1998, upon what legal basis the seizure had been upheld after the execution of the sentence. At the 732nd meeting (December 2000), the Government was invited to provide information on this issue and on the possibility, according to Italian law, for an automatically lifting judicial seizures when such measures were no longer necessary. At the 803rd meeting (July 2002), the Government expressed the opinion that it was not the legislation itself but its application in the present case which was at the origin of the violation and that no legislative measures were required. However, The Secretariat indicated that measures needed to be taken in order to ensure the effectiveness of the legal system.

As regards the excessive length of the criminal proceedings, the general measures are examined in the group of cases concerning the excessive length of judicial proceedings which appears in Section 4.3.

H46-1012     37119          N.F., judgment of 02/08/2001, final on 12/12/2001[70]

The case notably concerns an unlawful interference with the freedom of association of the applicant, a judge, on account of a disciplinary sanction imposed on him in 1994 because of his affiliation to a Masonic association. The Court considered that the sanction was not “foreseeable” or “prescribed by the law” because the provisions at its basis (namely, Article 18 of Royal Decree No. 511 of 31/05/1946 combined with a 1990 directive of the Supreme Judicial Board) were not clear enough (violation of Article 11).

A new directive, clearly establishing the incompatibility of membership of Masonic associations with the exercise of judicial functions was issued in 1993 (when the procedure against the applicant had already started). The applicant indicated his wish that the disciplinary proceedings be reviewed and drew attention to Article 37§6 of the 1946 Decree, which may allow for such a revision (see §42 of the judgment).

Individual measures: Information is expected on the follow-up given by the Supreme Judicial Board (C.S.M.) to the applicant’s request for revision of the impugned disciplinary procedure.

General measures: the Italian authorities indicated that the judgment would be published in “Quaderni”, the legal review of the C.S.M.

Sub-section 4.2

H46-1013     31127          E.P. III, judgment of 16/11/99: decision of 11/07/00, revised judgment

                                      (Article 41) of 03/05/01

The case concerns the total and irreversible interruption of contact between the applicant and her daughter from 1988 onwards. The child, who was then seven years old and had lived until then in Greece with her mother, was removed from the mother’s care a few days after her arrival Italy, as the applicant presented psychological problems that could impair her daughter’s development. From then on, all contact between the applicant and her daughter was denied and the latter was first placed in public care and then declared available for adoption in 1989. The Court found that the national authorities had failed to take all necessary steps to ensure that the chances of the applicant and her daughter re-establishing their relationship should not be definitively compromised (violation of Article 8). Moreover, the Court found that the overall length of the proceedings, namely seven years, had been excessive, account being taken of the “particular dispatch” required in matters concerning children’s custody (violation of Article 6§1). The applicant died in 1999.

General measures: the necessity was raised of taking the appropriate measures to ensure that the Italian judiciary and administrative authorities take into account the critical remarks made by the European Court in this case as well as in the Scozzari case (judgment of 13/07/00 – see Section 4.3 of this document), which also concerns malfunctions occurring when children are taken into public care in Italy. In this perspective, the publication of the judgment was requested as well as other awareness-raising measures. As regards in particular the violation of Article 6 found in this case, it should be recalled that it is linked to the more general problem of the functioning of the Italian judicial system (see Interim Resolution ResDH(2000)135 and Section 4.3 of this document). Information has been requested about any special measures taken to ensure that cases requiring prompt settlement, like this one, are dealt with more rapidly. The Italian delegation informed the Committee that a draft law (No. 2517/C) had been introduced before Parliament in April 2002, aiming at centralising jurisdiction over family and children’s issues in special judicial sections in order to increase both the quality and the rapidity of decisions in this field.

H32-1015     23924          C.A.R. srl, Interim Resolution DH(98)154

The case concerns the fact that, between 1991 and 1994, the applicant company, despite a final court decision ordering the eviction of the tenant on grounds of non-payment of rent, was unable to obtain police assistance through the Prefect to secure the eviction of a group of Somali refugees illegally occupying its buildings. It also concerns the absence of compensation from the State for the financial damage the applicant company suffered as a result of the authorities’ inaction.

On 18 June 1998, the Deputies decided, accepting the reasoning of the Commission, that there had been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1: the Prefect’s refusal could be considered justified in the general interest and that the violation was due to the absence of compensation for the prejudice suffered in terms of both unpaid rent and damage to the property, in connection with the refugee’s occupation of the property until the administrative authorities had found them alternative accommodation.

General measures: At the 741st meeting it was indicated that general measures should be defined not least in the light of the judgment that the Court of Appeal of Rome would adopt in the proceedings brought by the applicant company in order to obtain compensation from the State for the damage caused by the failure by the forces of order to assist. At first instance (1996), the action was rejected because Italian law did not establish a right to obtain compensation in case of non-execution of a judgment on grounds of public interest.

Italian cases concerning the failure to enforce judicial eviction orders against tenants

H46-1018     22774          Immobiliare Saffi, judgment of 28/07/99 - Grand Chamber

H32-1022     20177          Aldini, Interim Resolution DH(97)413

H46-1014     22534          A.O., judgment of 30/05/00, final on 30/08/00

H46-1019     22671          G.L. IV, judgment of 03/08/00, final on 03/11/00

H46-1017     21463          Lunari, judgment of 11/01/01, final on 11/04/01

H46-1021     24650          P.M., judgment of 11/01/01, final on 12/09/01

Sub-section 4.2

H46-1020     15919          Palumbo Edoardo, judgment of 30/11/00, final on 01/03/01

H46-1016     23424          Tanganelli, judgment of 11/01/01, final on 11/04/01

These cases mainly concern the sustained impossibility for the applicants to obtain the assistance of the police in order to enforce judicial decisions ordering their tenants’ eviction, owing to the implementation of legislation providing for the suspension or staggering of evictions.

The Court concluded that a fair balance had not been struck between the protection of the applicants’ right of property and the requirements of the general interest (violations of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1). In some of these cases, the Court also concluded that, as a result of the legislation at issue, rendering eviction orders nugatory, the applicants had been deprived of their right to have their disputes decided by a court, contrary to the principle of the rule of law (violation of Article 6§1).

General measures: A new law was adopted in December 1998 (Law No. 431/98 “Regulations concerning the renting and the repossession of housing”), which sets – inter alia – the conditions, modalities and deadlines for the enforcement of eviction decisions. The Director General of human rights asked, as early as September 1999, to have information with regard to the concrete measures adopted to implement this legislation as well as some data confirming the effectiveness of the new measures.

By letter of 19 June 2001, the Italian authorities informed the Committee that the Ministry for Home Affairs was approaching the other competent departments in order to identify further and more effective measures, both on the administrative and legislative level, notably with a view to simplifying the proceedings.

At the 775^th bis meeting (January 2002), the Representative of Italy indicated that some implementation problems still existed in practice, notably in some major towns, but were on their way to being solved.

However, in August 2002 a new law (No. 185/02) suspended the implementation of eviction orders until 30/06/2003.

In addition, the Immobiliare Saffi judgment has been published in the legal journal Rivista internazionale dei diritti dell’uomo, No. 1/2000, P. 252-265.

H46-1023     25498          Messina Antonio 2, judgment of 28/09/00, final on 28/12/00

The case relates to the monitoring of the applicant’s correspondence during his detention (violation of Article 8) as well as the lack of effective remedies against the restrictions resulting from the special prison regime (Section 41bis of the Prison Administration Act n° 354/75) to which he was subject (violation of Article 13). In a previous judgment of 26 February 1993, the European Court had already found inter alia a violation of Mr Messina’s right to respect of his correspondence during his detention (see Resolution DH(94)62).

As regards the violation of Article 8, this case is similar to the cases of Diana and Domenichini (judgments of 1996).

As regards available remedies to check the lawfulness of the imposed restrictions, the Court found that appeals to the Sentence Execution Courts were not an effective remedy on account of the systematic non-respect by these courts of legal deadlines for decision.

General measures: As regards the effectiveness of remedies to check the lawfulness of restrictions imposed on prisoners, the Italian authorities informed the Secretariat, by letter of 4 December 2000, that the judgment of the European Court had been translated, published in the legal journal Documenti Giustizia and communicated to the authorities concerned, and that the Department for Penitentiary Administration would consider possible measures to prevent new violations of Article 13, similar to those found by the Court in this case (§§ 84-97 of the judgment). The Secretariat would like to know the result of these reflections. The issue of the legislative measures needed to solve the problem related to the monitoring of the correspondence will be re-examined in February 2003 (see Interim Resolution ResDH(2001)178).

- 1 case against Lithuania

H46-960       47698+        Birutis and others, judgment of 28/03/2002, final on 28/06/2002

The case concerns a violation of the applicants’ right to a fair trial in criminal proceedings conducted in 1997 before the Kaunas Regional Court, in that the applicants were convicted either solely or partially on the basis of anonymous testimony without the opportunity to question the witnesses or to have them questioned (violation of Article 6§1 and §3d). As a result, the first and second applicants were sentenced to 10 years’ and the third applicant to 6 years' imprisonment.

Sub-section 4.2

Individual measures: The Lithuanian authorities have indicated to the Committee that the criminal proceedings challenged by the European Court's judgment had been reopened. By decision of 27 June 2002, the Supreme Court quashed the final decision by which the applicants were convicted and sent the case back for re-examination at appeal.

General measures: Articles 267§5 and 317 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, challenged both by the present judgment and by a previous decision of the Lithuanian Constitutional Court, were first amended on 23/01/2001. Subsequently, in the framework of a broader legislative reform, Parliament adopted on 14/03/2002 a new Code of Criminal Procedure which will enter into force in 2003. According to the authorities, the new provisions concerning witnesses take full account of both aforementioned judgments. A copy of these provisions was requested for examination. The Lithuanian authorities also indicated that the judgment would be published shortly (in Lithuanian translation) in the Bulletin of the European Court’s judgments.

- 1 case against Moldova

H46-1025     45701          Metropolitan Church of Bessarabia and others, judgment of 13/12/01,

                                      final on 27/03/02

                                      Addendum 4, volume 1

The case concerns the failure of the Government to recognise the Metropolitan Church of Bessarabia. The Court concluded that this non-recognition constituted an interference with the applicants’ right to freedom of religion and that this interference, although pursuing a legitimate aim, was not “necessary in a democratic society” and thus not justified under the Convention (violation of Article 9). The Court also concluded that the applicants did not enjoy an effective remedy in respect of their claims at domestic level (violation of Article 13).

Individual measures: On 31 July 2002, the Government's agent indicated to the Secretariat that the competent authorities had recognised the Metropolitan Church of Bessarabia  (recognition certificate No.1651 of 30 July 2002) in accordance with the Moldovan law on Religious Denominations, as amended by the Law No.1220-XV of 12 July 2002 (see below).

This recognition would appear to erase the consequences of the violation of the Convention in the present case, as regards in particular the legal personality of the Church and, consequently, its right to peaceful enjoyment of its possessions.

At the 806^th meeting (September 2002), the Representative of Moldova stated that the Church would be able – like other religious communities – to participate in the procedures defined by a Governmental decision of 10 June 2002 (this decision appears in Addendum 4, volume 1) with a view to recognition of its property. Confirmation in this respect has been requested in writing.

Subsequently, the applicants contacted the Secretariat alleging problems with regard to their property claims. They furthermore challenged the Government's decree of 26/09/2001, which states that Metropolitan Church of Moldova is a legal successor of Metropolitan Church of Bessarabia, and certain new provisions of the Criminal Code relating to illegal occupation of religious buildings.

In view of these allegations, the Moldovan delegation was requested at the 810th meeting (October 2002) to provide the Secretariat in writing for the 819th meeting (3-4 December 2002) with details concerning possible effects of the above-mentioned texts on the applicant church's situation, notably with regard to enjoyment of its property rights. At the time of issuing the present annotated agenda, the Secretariat had not yet received these clarifications.

General measures: The Moldovan authorities informed the Committee of Ministers that the original version of the judgment of the European Court and its official translation into Moldovan were published on 9 July 2002 in the Official Journal of Moldova (Monitorul Oficial, n°100).

The Moldovan authorities also indicated that the Moldovan legislation on religious denominations was amended by Law n°1220-XV which entered into force on 12 July 2002. The relevant provisions (articles 9, 14, 49 and 52) of the Law, as amended, appear in Addendum 4, volume 1.

Sub-section 4.2

The new provisions (Article 14) provide among other things that religious denominations are free to organise themselves and can function after depositing a declaration and their statutes with the competent authority, which will register the denomination in question in the State Register of Religious Denominations within 30 days following the deposit. Such recognition can be declared void though judicial proceedings in case of violation of the conditions provided for in Article 9 (§3). The latter prohibits religious denominations from conducting activities which undermine the independence, sovereignty, integrity and security of the Republic of Moldova, as well as the Constitution and the legislation in force, or to undertake actions connected with political activities.

Article 325 of the Code of Civil Procedure has also been amended so as to allow the reopening of domestic civil proceedings following violations of the Convention found by the European Court. The Moldovan authorities moreover recalled that a similar provision (Article 369/2, 1i) has been in existence since June 2000 in the Code of Criminal Procedure (see Addendum 4, volume 1).

Following the adoption of the new law, the attention of the Moldovan authorities was drawn to the fact that the requirement of proportionality embodied in the Convention did not appear to be included in articles 9§3 and 14 which set out the conditions under which the Moldovan authorities can cancel the recognition of a religion. It was furthermore noted that the new law was not absolutely clear and detailed with regard to the right of a religious community to take judicial proceedings against the authorities' decision to cancel the recognition of this religion. This lack of clarity could prejudice the effective judicial control required by Article 13 and, consequently, the effective prevention of new violations similar to those found in the present case. This analysis was shared by the independent experts who had been mandated, upon the request of the Moldovan authorities and within the framework of the Targeted Co-operation Programme to assist in the implementation of commitments, to assess the compatibility of the new Law on Religious Denominations (as amended) with Council of Europe standards, notably the ECHR.

During the consideration of this case at the 806^th meeting (September 2002), the Representative of Moldova indicated that, following the aforementioned expert examination, the Minister of Justice had set up a working party to draw up an entirely new version of the law which would remedy the aforementioned problems. At the 810th meeting (October 2002), the Representative of Moldova stated that the work on the new draft law was progressing and that a copy of the draft would be submitted to the Secretariat as soon as it is finalised, which is expected by November 2002.

- 1 case against the Netherlands

H46-1027     26668          Visser, judgment of 14/02/02

The case concerns the violation of the applicant’s right to a fair trial, notably before the Court of Appeal of The Hague which sentenced him in September 1993 to a year’s imprisonment, using as evidence, among others, a statement taken from an anonymous witness (violation of Article 6§§1 and 3d).

The case presents similarities to the case Van Mechelen & others (judgment of 23/04/1997) against the Netherlands (Resolution DH(99)124).

Individual measures: Information has been requested on the latest situation of the applicant, and in particular on whether he is still suffering the consequences of the conviction imposed following an unfair trial.

General measures: At the 792nd meeting it was indicated that the publication of the judgment would be useful. Information on this is awaited.

- 9 cases against Poland

H46-1031     25792          Trzaska, judgment of 11/07/00

H46-1028     33492          Jabłoński, judgment of 21/12/00

H46-1030     33079          Szeloch, judgment of 22/02/01, final on 22/05/01

H46-1029     34097          Kreps, judgment of 26/07/01, final on 26/10/01

H46-1032     27504          Iłowiecki, judgment of 04/10/01, final on 04/01/02

These cases concern the excessive length of the applicants’ detention on remand given that the grounds relied upon by the domestic courts in support of the detention could not be deemed, as required by the European Court’s case-law, “relevant and sufficient” and since “special diligence” was not displayed in the conduct of the proceedings (violations of Article 5§3). The cases also concern the excessive length of the criminal proceedings against the applicants (violations of Article 6§1).

Sub-section 4.2

General measures: The first three judgments of the European Court were published in the Bulletin of the Council of Europe Information Centre and disseminated to the competent authorities. Circulars are being prepared drawing the attention of courts and public prosecutors to the reasoning needed for decisions prolonging detention on remand. Copies of these circulars are awaited. Furthermore, information is awaited about other measures already adopted by the Government following the entry into force on 01/09/1998 of the new Code of Criminal Procedure.

The cases present similarities with a number of other cases concerning the length of judicial proceedings, pending before the Committee of Ministers for control of general measures (see notably Podbielski, Styranowski, judgments of 30/10/1998 and Kudła, judgment of 26/10/2000 (see below)).

H46-3185     34049          Zwierzynski, judgment of 19/06/01, final on 19/09/01

The case concerns the excessive length of certain civil proceedings, lodged by the Treasury and aimed at acquiring property which had been returned by judicial decision to the applicant: when the Court delivered its judgment, the case was still pending before the Lomza district Court and had already lasted, within the meaning of the Convention, 8 years and 1 month (violation of Article 6§1). The case also concerns an infringement of the applicant’s right to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions because of the proceedings lodged by the State, without any reason of “public interest”, which have resulted in the postponement of the effective restitution of the property to the applicant (violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1).

Individual measures: the Lomza district Court delivered its judgment on 21/09/2001 and dismissed the Treasury action for acquisition by usurpation; the Treasury appealed against the court’s decision, but only on the issue of court costs. Information concerning the outcome of these proceedings is expected.

General measures: Publication of the judgment of the European Court translated into Polish is under way. The judgment was communicated to the Ministry of Justice for dissemination to courts, and to the Ministry of Internal Affairs for dissemination notably to the police. Information concerning the publication of the judgment in Polish is awaited.

H46-1033     30210          Kudła, judgment of 26/10/00 - Grand Chamber

The case concerns, inter alia, the excessive length (2 years, 4 months) of the applicant’s detention on remand on charges of fraud and forgery (violation of Article 5§3) and the excessive length (7 years, 5 months) of the related criminal proceedings (violation of Article 6§1). The case furthermore concerns the lack of effective remedies to enforce, at national level, the applicant’s right to a hearing “within a reasonable time” (violation of Article 13).

General measures: During the first examination of the case (732nd meeting, December 2000), the Committee noted the breadth of the scope of this judgment: for the first time the Court had applied Article 13 of the Convention in order to affirm that contracting States must provide effective domestic remedies so as to resolve the problem of excessive length of proceedings. The Committee also took note of the fact that the remedies required in this regard by Article 13 could be both compensatory and preventive (§159 of the judgment). It was suggested that general consideration be given to this topic, notably within the CDDH and its expert sub-committees, in order to facilitate the search for suitable solutions in member states. The Committee nonetheless considered that this general consideration must not be allowed to prejudice the Committee’s supervision of measures that Poland will adopt to comply with the Kudła judgment in accordance with Article 46 of the Convention.

At the 783rd meeting (February 2002), the Representative of Poland informed the Committee of the progress made in adoption of general measures. He referred in particular to:

- a number of improvements of the Code of Criminal Procedure contained in a draft law which has already been submitted to Parliament;

- a draft law prepared by a group of experts which provides mainly for compensatory but also for some preventive remedies against the excessive length of judicial proceedings (the draft is still being considered by the Government);

- a new decision of the Constitutional Court of 18/12/2001, which might open a way to civil claims against State officials on the grounds of excessive length of judicial proceedings.

Sub-section 4.2

During the last examination of the case at the 798th meeting (June 2002), the Polish Delegation confirmed that the aforementioned draft legislation was under consideration by the Ministry of justice or by Parliament but had not yet been enacted. Copies of the drafts and the information concerning possible effect of the above-mentioned decision by the Polish Constitutional Court have been requested. At the time of issuing the present annotated Agenda, the Secretariat had not yet received this information.

H46-1035     28249          Kreuz, judgment of 19/06/01

The case concerns a disproportionate restriction of the right of access to a court due to the dismissal of the applicant’s action for damages on the grounds that he had been unable to pay in advance court fees which were equivalent to the average annual salary in Poland (violation of Article 6§1).

General measures:  At the 764th meeting (October 2001), the Representative of Poland recalled that the present judgment poses a problem of access to justice and stated that the Ministry of Justice would attentively study the general measures to be adopted to remedy the shortcomings highlighted by the European Court. During the debate, it was noted that in addition to the ongoing reflection, it would be appropriate from the outset to ensure publication and a wide dissemination of the judgment by a circular to domestic courts in order to draw their attention to §33 of the judgment which indicates the position adopted by the Polish Supreme Court, to §§ 52-57 which sum up the principles set out in the European Court’s case-law, and finally to §§ 63-67 revealing the errors which were made by the domestic courts in this case. The Representative of Poland stated in response that the judgment had already been translated and that its publication was being envisaged. At the time of issuing the present annotated Agenda, no new information on general measures was available.

H46-1036     26229          Gaweda, judgment of 14/03/02

The case relates to the Polish courts’ refusal to register the names of the applicant’s two new periodicals on the basis of provisions of the Press Act of 26 January 1984 and of the Ordinance of the Minister of Justice on the register of periodicals. These provisions did not meet the Convention’s requirements of clarity and predictability and allowed too wide a discretion on the part of the authorities (violation of Article 10).

Individual measures: At the 798th meeting (June 2002), the Polish Delegation stated that there should at present be no obstacle to the registration of the periodicals concerned.

General measures: At the same meeting, the Polish Delegation stated that the Ministry of Justice was considering possibilities of amending the regulations governing the registration of periodicals and that it would later provide the Committee with more details on this matter. During the debate, it was furthermore noted that some changes to the above-mentioned regulations had already been introduced subsequent to the facts of the present case and the Polish authorities were invited to provide a copy of the provisions currently in force. Publication and wide dissemination of the judgment of the European Court to Polish courts were furthermore requested.

- 6 cases against Romania

H46-1038     28871          Constantinescu, judgment of 27/06/00

The case relates to the applicant’s conviction for defamation. He was the president of a teachers’ trade union and was prosecuted following the publication in the press of comments he had made regarding internal disputes in the union and the functioning of the judicial system. He had referred to three members of the previous trade-union leadership who had refused to return money belonging to the union after the election of new leaders, as “receivers of stolen goods”. The union had in addition lodged a criminal complaint against these persons. After having been acquitted by the first-instance court, the applicant was convicted, upon appeal, on the grounds that he had had the intention of being defamatory, without having the opportunity to give evidence and defend his case before the court which convicted him (violation of article 6§1).

Sub-section 4.2

General measures: At the 721^st meeting (September 2000), the Romanian Delegation indicated that periodic meetings between the Government’s agent and the Presidents of Appeal courts, relating to the judgment delivered by the Court, had been established and that within the framework of the training of judges, a course on the “Court’s case-law” had been introduced. The Secretariat is awaiting written confirmation of these measures. It sent a letter, dated 07/11/2000, to the Delegation giving some reflections on the measures which the authorities could take in order to conform to the judgment and awaits comments from the Delegation. At the 757^th and 775^th meetings (June and December 2001), the Secretariat recalled that it was still awaiting an answer or comments of the Delegation.

H46-1039     28341          Rotaru, judgment of 04/05/00 – Grand Chamber

The case concerns a breach of the applicant’s right to respect for his private life on account of the holding and use by the Romanian Intelligence Service of a file containing personal information (violation of Article 8). The case also concerns an infringement of his right to an effective remedy before a national authority that could rule on his application to have the file amended or destroyed (violation of Article 13). Lastly, the case concerns a breach of the applicant’s right to a fair trial on account of the Court of Appeal’s failure to consider the claim for damages and costs (violation of Article 6§1).

Individual measures: The erroneous indications included in the file that the Romanian Intelligence Service may hold on the applicant should be deleted. The judgment of the Court of Appeal of Bucharest dated 25/11/1997 (see §24 of the Judgment of the European Court) should be mentioned in the file of the person bearing the same name as the applicant and on the applicant’s file if it exists.

General measures:

. The judgment of the European Court has been translated and published in the official gazette.

. The attention of the Delegation has been drawn to the fact that the European Court’s conclusions in this case mean that Law, No. 14/1992 on the organisation and operation of the Romanian Intelligence Service, will have to be amended. The Delegation indicated, during the first examination of the case in October 2000, that a Bill on the protection of data of personal character was being examined. A letter recalling in detail the afore-mentioned measures was sent to the Representation of Romania on 6 November 2000. At the 775 bis  meeting (January 2002), the Romanian Delegation indicated that amendments to law No.14/1992 were envisaged. Information is awaited concerning the possible application of this law to the applicant.

H46-1040     28114          Dalban, judgment of 28/09/99 - Grand Chamber

The case concerns the applicant’s conviction for criminal libel in 1994, under Article 206 of the Criminal Code, for having published articles in which he exposed a series of frauds allegedly committed by a senior official and a member of parliament. The Court found a disproportionate interference with the applicant’s freedom of expression on account of the fact that, although Article 207 of the Romanian Criminal Code admits the adduction of evidence supporting the truthfulness of the declaration at issue when it has been made in order to protect a legitimate interest, the Romanian courts had not allowed the applicant to prove the truth of his allegations (violation of Article 10).

General measures: Since December 1999, the attention of the Romanian authorities has been drawn to the problems posed not least by Section 206 of the Criminal Code regarding freedom of expression, and the question was raised of the state of advancement of reforms envisaged in this field. The Delegation of Romania indicated at first that a broad reform of the Criminal Code was under way and promised in June 2001 that the relevant draft legislation would be transmitted to the Secretariat, who has however not received them yet. Subsequently, in May 2002, certain provisions of the Criminal Code concerning defamation were modified by emergency order, subject to Parliamentary ratification. According to available information, these amendments would increase the severity of the penalties provided in defamation cases, without modifying the substantive provisions. Information is therefore awaited about new reforms bringing Romanian law on defamation into conformity with the case-law of the European Court.

Furthermore, the Delegation has indicated that the Dalban judgment had been translated and sent out to Presidents of Courts of Appeal and that the case had been discussed in 1999 and 2000 at a seminar organised in by the Romanian Judges’ Association, a meeting of the Presidents of Courts of Appeal and a meeting of the Romanian Journalists’ Association. Information on the developments of the Romanian Courts’ case-law is expected.

Sub-section 4.2

H46-1041     29411          Anghelescu, judgment of 09/04/2002, final on 09/07/2002

H46-757       28342          Brumărescu, judgments of 28/10/99, 23/01/01 (Article 41) and of 11/05/01

                                      (rectification) – Grand Chamber[71]

H46-756       32260          Surpaceanu Constantin and Traian-Victor, judgment of 21/05/2002, final on 21/08/2002[72]

The cases concern the fact that the Supreme Court of Justice set aside final and irreversible decisions of a court of first instance, in breach of the right to a fair hearing (violations of Article 6§1). The court of first instance had found that the nationalisation of property belonging to the applicants’ houses was in breach of Decrees No. 92/1950 on nationalisation or No. 223/1974 (on confiscation) and ordered the return of the property to the applicants. The cases also concern the right of access to a court in that the Supreme Court, in the same decisions, held that it was not for the courts but for the executive or the legislature to deal with the manner in which Decree No. 92/1950 should be applied (violations of Article 6§1). Lastly, the cases concern a breach of the applicants’ right to enjoyment of their properties (violations of article 1 of Protocol No. 1).

General measures:

-          The translation of new Section 330 of the Code of Civil Procedure as amended by a Government Ordinance in 2000 has been sent to the Secretariat. The first sub-paragraph of section 330, on the basis of which the court decision in favour of the applicant was quashed, remains unchanged: “The Procurator General may, of his own motion or on an application by the Minister of Justice, apply to the Supreme Court of Justice for any final judicial decision to be quashed on any of the following grounds: 1.  that the court in question has exceeded its jurisdiction; (…)”. Only the deadline for invoking this paragraph has been modified: from 1 year to 6 months from the date on which the judicial decision becomes final.

-          Considering the discretion given to the Procurator General in interpreting this section and in particular its first paragraph, information on the field of application of former Section 330 of the Code of Civil Procedure, preferably with examples of the use of this article, has been requested.

-          The Romanian Delegation has given the Secretariat a copy of the “Law on the rules governing real property improperly seized between 6 March 1945 and 22 December 1989”.

-          At the time of issuing the present annotated agenda, the information requested at the 792nd meeting concerning the field of application of article 330 of the Code of Civil Procedure was awaited.

Individual measure and just satisfaction:

-          Concerning Mr. Brumărescu, the Romanian authorities have restored the building at issue, apart from the flat occupied by Mr Mirescu, which has been valued at USD 42 000 by the Court. The applicant having refused to accept this sum, it has been placed on an account in the Treasury of the Municipality of Bucharest and can be paid as soon as the applicant asks for it. The other sums awarded by the Court in respect of non-pecuniary damages and costs and expenses were paid with 4 days’ delay. Concerning Mr Anghelescu, the Secretariat indicated at the 810th meeting (October 2002) that measures should be taken to accelerate the proceedings aimed at revoking his title to property, still pending at national level. Information in this respect is expected.

- 1 case against the Russian Federation

H46-1042     59498          Burdov, judgment of 07/05/2002, final on 04/09/2002[73]

The case concerns the non-execution in full or in part over several years by the Russian social authorities of final decisions delivered in 1997-2000 by the Shakhty City Court (Rostov region) which ordered them to pay the applicant compensation for damage to his health sustained during his participation in emergency operations at the Chernobyl nuclear plant (violations of Articles 6 and of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1). The amounts owed were paid on 5 March 2001.

Sub-section 4.2

General measures: During the first examination of the case (810th meeting, October, 2002), the Russian authorities pointed out a certain number of measures adopted or under way, which relate in particular to the:

- publication of the judgment in Rossijskaia Gazeta and its wide dissemination with a view to ensuring that the competent authorities may comply therewith;

- payment of arrears because of the non-execution, as in the Burdov case, of domestic judgments ordering the payment of allowances for the victims of Chernobyl (a total of 284,6 million rubles were paid between January and October 2002);

- execution of 5128 other domestic judgments concerning the indexation of the allowances for the victims of Chernobyl and allocation of the necessary budgetary means (378,6 million rubles for 2002 and 260 million rubles for 2003) to social security bodies to allow them to meet the obligations arising from these judgments;

- introduction of amendments to the legislation governing the payment of social benefits in order to provide for a system of indexation of the allowances for the victims of Chernobyl;

The Deputies took note of this information and agreed to resume detailed consideration of the execution of the judgment at their 819th meeting. During the debate, focus was put in particular on the urgency of the efficient general measures in view of the extent of the problem at the basis of this and numerous other cases pending before the Court. The particular importance of the legislative measures to ensure effective indexation of the allowances in question was also stressed. It was furthermore recalled that these aspects had been addressed specifically in the letter of the Director General of Human Rights sent on 26/09/2002 to the Representative of the Russian Federation before the Court.

- 30 cases against Turkey

H46-1043     40035          Jabari, judgment of 11/07/00, final on 11/10/00

This case concerns the decision to deport the applicant to Iran, where, she maintains, she runs the risk of being stoned to death or flogged, these being the penalties prescribed by Iranian law as punishment for adultery. She lodged an asylum application which was rejected, on the grounds that it had been submitted out of the 5-day time-limit as from her arrival in Turkey. She was later granted refugee status by the UNHCR but her appeals against the deportation order and to obtain a stay of execution were nevertheless rejected by the Administrative Court. The European Court holds that there would be a real risk of the applicant being subjected to treatment in breach of Article 3 if she were to be deported (violation of Article 3 if the decision to deport the applicant to Iran were implemented). Her failure to comply with the 5-day time-limit denied her any scrutiny of the factual basis of her fears: the Administrative Court limited itself to the issue of the formal legality of the deportation order. There was no assessment by the domestic authorities of the risk claimed by the applicant and the refusal to consider her asylum request was not open to appeal. Given the irreversible nature of the harm that might occur, the notion of an effective remedy requires independent and rigorous scrutiny and the possibility of suspending the implementation of the measure impugned, which was not the case (violation of Article 13).

General measures: The judgment has been translated and published, but a circular for the attention of the administrative authorities and courts is still awaited.

The Delegation transmitted to the Secretariat the regulations on asylum seekers, as modified in 1998 (the five-day period in which to lodge an appeal has been increased to ten days).  The Delegation also sent a letter dated 13/11/02 in which it indicated notably that it would be appropriate to apply to the Jabari case the same parameters as those applied in the Kalantari v. Germany judgment, i.e. no particular supervision by the Committee.

However, the Secretariat must underline that the Kalantari judgment was a striking-out calling for no supervision by the Committee except the payment of costs and expenses, because the Court had found that it was not necessary to continue examination of the case, the national authorities having already taken measures to annul the expulsion order prior to its judgment. As regards the violation of Article 13, details of the guarantees offered by appeals before first-degree administrative courts and before the Council of State, are awaited. In particular, do these appeals have suspensive effect? Information concerning the standard used to evaluate whether or not a person should be expelled would be useful, Article 3 of Convention having to be taken into account.

Sub-section 4.2

H46-1045     34382          Denmark against Turkey, judgment of 05/04/00 - Friendly settlement

The Danish Government complained of ill treatment suffered by Mr Kemal Koç, a Danish national, during his detention in Turkey from 8 to 16 August 1996. In addition, the Danish Government asked the Convention’s organs to examine whether the interrogation techniques allegedly applied to Mr Koç were applied in Turkey as a widespread practice.

The Court took note of a friendly settlement reached between the parties according to which the respondent Government has agreed to pay the applicant Government an amount of 450 000 Danish crowns which includes legal expenses connected with the case. The amount has been paid.

The Government of Denmark and the Government of Turkey made a joint statement, which appears in §21 of the judgment. The Government of Denmark indicated in particular that it would make a significant financial contribution to the Council of Europe’s project aimed at re-organizing the content of police training.

This project started on 11/02/2002 (with a pilot course for the “training of the trainers”) and should be assessed for the first time at the beginning of June. At the 798th meeting (June 2002) the delegations informed the Committee of Ministers about the implementation of the project. A meeting between the governments and the Steering Committee of the Joint programme was organised on 18/10/2002. Information is awaited.

                   - Friendly settlement cases containing undertakings of the Turkish Government

H46-1046     24940          Acar, judgment of 18/12/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-1047     32598          Akbay, judgment of 04/10/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-1044     37453          Akman, judgment of 26/06/01 – Striking-out

H46-1048     24935          Avcı, judgment of 10/07/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-1049     28293+        Aydın K., C. Aydin and S. Aydin and others, judgment of 10/07/01 –

                                      Friendly settlement

H46-768       29289          Aydın Mehmet, judgment of 16/07/2002 - Friendly settlement[74]

H46-1050     24946          Boğ, judgment of 10/07/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-1051     24938          Boğa, judgment of 10/07/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-1052     24934          Değer, judgment of 10/07/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-1053     24990          Demir, judgment of 10/07/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-1054     24939          Doğan, judgment of 10/07/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-1055     31246          Ercan, judgment of 25/09/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-764       26337          Erdoğan Mahmut, judgment of 20/06/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-1056     30953+        I.I., I.S., K.E., and A.O., judgment of 06/11/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-1057     24945          Kemal Güngü, judgment of 18/12/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-1058     24944          Kızılgedik, judgment of 10/07/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-770       31136          Önder Yalçın, judgment of 25/07/2002 - Friendly settlement[75]

H46-1059     24936          Orak Adnan, judgment of 10/07/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-1060     27735          Oral and others, judgment of 28/03/02 - Friendly settlement

H46-1061     31883          Özbey, judgment of 31/01/02 - Friendly settlement

H46-1062     24942+        Parlak, Aktürk and Tay, judgment of 10/07/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-1063     29359          Saki, judgment of 30/10/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-1064     24991          Şenses, judgment of 10/07/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-765       22281          Yaşa Sıddık, judgment of 27/06/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-771       32979          Yıldız Özgür, judgment of 16/07/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-767       29856          Özcan Mehmet, judgment of 09/04/02 – Friendly settlement[76]

Sub-section 4.2

H46-769       30492          Erat and Sağlam, judgment of 26/03/02 – Friendly settlement[77]

H46-772       27532          Z.Y., judgment of 09/04/02 – Friendly settlement

These cases mainly concern alleged violations of Articles 2, 3, 5, 6, 8,13, 14 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol 1 in the period between May 1991 and September 1995 connected with the disappearance of applicants’ relatives and the destruction of properties during certain operations conducted by the security forces, the ill-treatment inflicted on applicants during police custody and their prolonged detention without being presented promptly to a judge.

According to the friendly settlements, the Turkish Government, in addition to payment of just satisfaction, undertakes notably “to issue appropriate instructions and adopt all the necessary measures” – including the obligation to carry out effective investigations – to ensure that the right to life and the prohibition of such forms of ill-treatment are respected in the future, that all the deprivations of liberty are fully recorded by the authorities and that effective investigations into alleged disappearances are carried out in accordance with their obligations under the Convention. In some cases, the Government referred in this connection to the commitments which they undertook in the Declaration agreed on in Application no. 34382/97 (Denmark v. Turkey, see Subsection 4.2 of the present annotated agenda) and reiterate their resolve to give effect to those commitments.

General Measures: The general measures here at issue were summed up in the Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98 which was adopted at 803rd DH meeting (July 2002). Subsequently, the Turkish Delegation furnished new information on the improvement of the rights of suspects and the confidentiality of medical examinations during their detention, as well as activities for awareness-raising of security forces, prosecutors and judges. The follow-up to the above-mentioned Interim Resolution will be re-examined at the 834^th DH meeting (April 2003).

- 13 cases against the United Kingdom

H32-2800     23496          Quinn, Interim Resolutions DH(98)214 and ResDH(2002)85

H32-2801     22384          Murray Kevin, Interim Resolutions DH(98)156 and ResDH(2002)85

H46-2802     28135          Magee, judgment of 06/06/00, final on 06/09/00, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)085

H54-2803     18731          Murray John, judgment of 08/02/96, Interim Resolutions DH(2000)26 and ResDH(2002)85

H46-2804     36408          Averill, judgment of 06/06/00, final on 06/09/00, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)85

                                      Addendum 4, volume 1

These cases concern the right to silence, the right not to incriminate oneself and the denial of access to legal advice during the first 48 hours of detention (24 hours in the Averill case), in combination with the provisions in national law whereby the choice of the accused to remain silent could result in the court’s or jury’s drawing unfavourable conclusions (violations of Article 6§3c alone or combined with Article 6§1).

General measures: a number of interim measures have been taken since the adoption of the judgments by the European Court and of decisions by the Committee of Ministers in these cases to avoid putting suspects in the situations impugned by the European Court and the Committee of Ministers. Legislative reforms are also under way. Interim Resolution DH(2000)26 was adopted in the Murray John case at the 695th meeting (February 2000) summarising all the measures taken and envisaged by the United Kingdom authorities in order to implement the Court’s judgment.

At the 798th meeting (June 2002) the Deputies adopted a second interim resolution, ResDH(2002)85, concerning all the above cases, in which, among other things, they strongly encouraged the United Kingdom authorities to take all necessary measures to ensure the rapid entry into force of the amendments to the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 and the Criminal Evidence (Northern Ireland) Order 1999. The Interim Resolutions DH(2000)26 and DH(2002)85 are included in Addendum 4, volume 1 to this annotated agenda and order of business.

Sub-section 4.2

H46-1065     33394          Price, judgment of 10/07/01, final on 10/10/01

The case concerns degrading treatment suffered by the applicant, a four-limb-deficient thalidomide victim dependent on a wheelchair, during her custody and imprisonment due to detention conditions which were inadequate in view of the applicant's special needs (violation of Article 3).

General measures: At the 775^th meeting (December 2001), it was indicated that publication and wide dissemination of the judgment by circular to domestic courts and prison authorities would be useful. Confirmation is awaited in this respect. The Government was also asked to provide information about other measures envisaged to satisfy the needs of disabled persons in detention.

H46-1066     40787          Hirst, judgment of 24/07/01, final on 24/10/01

The case concerns the applicant’s complaint that he could not obtain a review by a court of the lawfulness of his continued detention (once his tariff had expired) “at Her Majesty’s pleasure” (violation of Article 5§4). The applicant was sentenced to life imprisonment on 11 February 1980 and the tariff period of 15 years expired on 25 June 1994.

The case presents similarities to those of Hussain, Singh, A.T. and Oldham against the United Kingdom (see resolutions DH(98)149, DH(98)150, DH(98)202 and ResDH(2001)160 respectively).

Individual measures: Information has been requested as to whether the panel of the Parole Board met, as scheduled, on 2 February 2002, and, if so, the decision adopted.

General measures: the Committee has asked for statistics/information on the number of life prisoners who have had their cases reviewed more than one year after the entry into force of the new legislation (Crime Sentence Act 1997). Exact references concerning publication of the judgment of the European Court (Times Law Report) have been requested.

H46-906       28883          McKerr, judgment of 04/05/01, final on 04/08/01[78]

H46-907       37715          Shanaghan, judgment of 04/05/01, final on 04/08/01[79]

H46-908       24746          Hugh Jordan, judgment of 04/05/01, final on 04/08/01[80]

H46-909       30054          Kelly and others, judgment of 04/05/01, final on 04/08/01[81]

                                      Addendum 4, volume 1

These cases concern the death of applicants’ next-of-kin during police detention or security forces operations. In this respect, the Court mainly found the following shortcomings in the proceedings for investigating the use of lethal force by police officers/ security forces (violation of Article 2): lack of independence of the investigating police officers from the security forces/police officers involved in the events; lack of public scrutiny and information to the victims’ families concerning the reasons for decisions not to prosecute any soldier / police officer; the inquest procedure did not allow for any verdict or findings which could play an effective role in securing a prosecution in respect of any criminal offence which might have been disclosed; the soldiers / police officers who shot the deceased could not be required to attend the inquest as witnesses; the non-disclosure of witness statements prior to the witnesses’ appearance at the inquest prejudiced the ability of the applicants to participate in the inquest and contributed to long adjournments in the proceedings; the inquest proceedings did not commence promptly and were not pursued with reasonable expedition.

General measures: Representatives of the United Kingdom and the Secretariat have maintained various contacts in order to discuss the Government’s preliminary position in respect of the measures that need to be adopted.

The publication of the judgments of the European Court and dissemination to police officers / security officers and judicial authorities concerned are still to be confirmed. Copies of the judgments have been sent to the Director of Public Prosecutions and to all coroners in Northern Ireland.

Sub-section 4.2

On 25 September 2002, consultations took place between the Secretariat and representatives of the United Kingdom authorities regarding the measures to be taken. On 07/10/2002, following these consultations, the United Kingdom authorities submitted to the Committee of Ministers a document containing a package of measures (either already adopted or for adoption) with a view to avoiding the repetition of the violations found in these cases. A preliminary examination of this information was made at the 810th meeting (October 2002). The Deputies decided to continue this examination at the present meeting. The main document is included in Addendum 4, volume 1 and the appendix (300 pages) to the document can be obtained from the Secretariat in the original language.

H46-1067     24833          Matthews, judgment of 18/02/99, Interim Resolution ResDH(2001)79

The case concerns the non-respect of the right to participate in elections to choose the legislature in that no election to the European Parliament was organised in Gibraltar (violation of Article 3 of Protocol No. 1).

General measures: the Government of the United Kingdom has informed the Committee of Ministers about its efforts within the European Union to find a satisfactory solution to this case. The Government’s priority remains to secure the agreement of its EU partners to the enfranchisement of Gibraltar through a change to the 1976 EC Act on Direct Elections to the European Parliament. The United Kingdom is committed to achieving enfranchisement for Gibraltar for the 2004 European Parliament elections. However, it appears that, at the European Union level, the dossier currently remains blocked and, consequently, the United Kingdom has not ruled out any option available in order to fulfil the Court’s judgment. The Committee of Ministers has asked to be kept informed of any development in this field.

The case has received extensive newspaper coverage and, it has been published, notably in the Human Rights Report, Human Rights Digest and other legal journals. Full details of the publication have been requested.

In June 2001, at the 792nd meeting, the Committee of Ministers adopted Interim Resolution ResDH(2001)79 urging the United Kingdom to take the necessary measures to secure the rights in Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 in respect of elections to the European Parliament in Gibraltar.

H54-1069     25599          A., judgment of 23/09/98

The case concerns the failure of the State to protect the applicant from ill-treatment (1993-1994) by his step-father (violation of Article 3).

General measures: newspaper coverage has been extensive. The publication of the European Court’s judgment in a legal journal is still to be confirmed.

As regards possible legislative changes over and above the Human Rights Act, the Secretariat has received a copy of the Consultation Paper on the Physical Punishment of Children prepared by the United Kingdom authorities. Answers to the questions raised in the above-mentioned paper were ready by mid-2001. It was indicated that the answers should be the basis for further discussions on possible legislative changes to be introduced.

In the Government’s view, the availability of the Human Rights Act will however suffice to prevent the recurrence of a breach of the kind found by the Court in this case. At the 775th meeting (December 2001) the United Kingdom authorities informed the Committee that, finally, no further legislative changes will be introduced. The question has been raised as to how parents, in the absence of a clear legislative change, are supposed to know that domestic courts will now interpret the existing legislation in line with the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights. Further information on this point has been requested.

                   SUB-SECTION 4.3 – SPECIAL PROBLEMS

- 2151 cases against Italy

H46-1071     39221+        Scozzari and others, judgment of 13/07/00 – Grand Chamber

                                      Interim Resolutions ResDH(2001)65 and ResDH(2001)151, CM/Inf(2001)12 and CM/Inf(2002)20

                                      Addendum 4, volume 1

The case concerns two violations of Article 8 of the Convention related, on the one hand, to the continued placement, since 1997, of the two children of the first applicant (mother) in the “Forteto” community, after they had been taken into public care and, on the other hand, to the authorities’ failure to maintain the opportunities of the mother and her children to re-establish family bonds, through the organisation of regular contact visits. The Court notably considered the fact that certain “Forteto” leaders with serious previous convictions notably for ill-treatment and sexual abuse of handicapped people placed in the community (§§32-34) could still play an active role in bringing up the children (§§201-208); the fact that the implementation of the Youth Court’s decisions had been deflected from their intended purpose of allowing visits between the mother and the children to take place as a result of the attitude of the social services (§§178-179 & 213) and of some of the leaders of “Il Forteto” (§211), who had delayed or hindered the implementation of such decisions (§209) and exercised a mounting influence on the children aimed at distancing them from their mother (§210); the doubt about who really has effective care of the children (§211); the insufficient level of control on the social services and the “Forteto” (§§179-181 & §§212-216); the risk of long-term integration of the children into the “Forteto”, which – in the Court’s opinion - runs contrary to the objectives of a temporary placement and of the superior interest of the children (§§215-216).

Just satisfaction: The payment of the default interests due to Ms Scozzari’s lawyer and to the children has not been confirmed yet.

Individual measures: The temporary placement of the children in the “Forteto” community was confirmed by the Florence Youth Court, on 18/09/2000, until the end of the school-year 2000-2001 and then extended, on 17/07/2001, for a maximum (renewable) duration of three years. The first applicant has appealed against this decision: the proceedings are currently pending and a new decision is expected soon. Other proceedings, also concerning the placement of the children, are pending at first instance. These proceedings might allow the judicial authorities to assess the present situation of the children in the light of the elements which led the European Court to find that the rights of the mother and of her children had been violated (see above).

In fact, in spite of the adoption of two Interim resolutions by the Committee of Ministers respectively in May and October 2001 (ResDH(2001)65 and ResDH(2001)151, see Addendum 4, volume 1), so far the judicial decisions confirming the continuation of the placement of the children in the “Forteto” have failed to consider these elements and to either take remedial actions (such as the transferral of the children elsewhere) or explain why they no longer constitute a risk that the violations found by the Court are continuing or might be repeated. A letter, recalling the results expected, both as regards individual and general measures, was addressed to the Italian authorities on 08/07/2002, who replied on 30 September 2002. In the meantime, the Public Prosecutor notably requested the Court of Appeal to replace the current guardian of the children, to place the latter in a real family, out of the “Forteto” but within the same territory and to increase the efforts of the local services aimed at restoring the links between the mother and the children. Furthermore, the applicant sent to Secretariat a videotape from the monthly meeting in September 2002 in which the children indicate inter alia that, contrary to the Youth Court orders of July 2001, they are still sleeping separately, each of them sharing his bedroom with a “foster parent”. According to the children, there is no traditional “family”  within the community, as marriages are organised only with a view to having the right to obtain the placement of children in the “family”.

Sub-section 4.3

As regards the contacts between the mother and the children, the Youth Court found, in December 2000, that the social services were still continuing to delay and hamper the implementation of its decisions to organise such visits. Therefore, after three short visits in March-April 2001 (interrupted when Ms Scozzari moved to Belgium), on 17/07/2001 the Youth Court decided that a regular programme of visits should be set up, with the participation of an official of the social services, appointed among those having never previously intervened in the procedure. Following this decision, monthly visits have been taking place since December 2001, also thanks to the Belgian authorities’ undertaking to pay the travel expenses for Ms Scozzari and a qualified assistant. The question has been raised – both in the course of the discussions within the Committee of ministers and before the domestic courts – (see CM/Inf(2002)20) of whether such visits are organised in such a way to effectively allow a resumption of family relations, in conformity with the Youth Court’s decision and the Strasbourg Court’s judgment. In the framework of the pending appeal proceedings, the Appeal Court, on 08/02/2002, decided that an expert psychological report should be established on this issue. This report was presented on 31/07/2002 and the Appeal Court examined its conclusions on 25/09/2002.

General measures: The judgment of the European Court was translated and published in the legal review Rivista Internazionale dei Diritti dell’Uomo, No. 3/2000, p. 1015-1046.

With respect to awareness-raising measures, in May 2001, the Superior Judicial Council asked for the organisation of seminars, both at national and local level, to train magistrates of Youth Courts on the requirements of the Convention, as interpreted in the Strasbourg case-law in the field of family law. This project has not been followed up yet. Further measures aimed at raising the awareness of the social services of the same issues are being considered.

As regards the existence of an effective and regular supervision mechanism of the placement of children, the Italian Delegation presented information on two reports of the Tuscany regional council on the “Forteto” in May 2001 and February 2002, as well as a guardianship judge’s report established following an inspection in December 2001. At the 792nd meeting (April 2002), the Italian Delegation explained however that these were ad hoc reports: regular inspections are only required when children are formally placed in an institution. Such controls would not be foreseen in case of placement with individual families, even if these belong to a community, such as in this case. At the 798^th meeting (June 2002), the attention of the Italian delegation was drawn to the need to fill this legal gap. Subsequently, the Italian Delegation informed the Secretariat of the adoption of a new law (No. 149/01) in 2001, amending and making more precise certain provisions on adoption and placement of children, including as regards controls. According to the Italian delegation this law introduces regular control also over institutions such as the “Forteto”. A draft law (No. 2517/C) aiming at centralising jurisdiction over issues concerning minors has also been under examination by Parliament since April 2002.

As regards the effectiveness of existing controls, the attention of the Committee of Ministers was drawn to certain alleged links existing between the authorities in charge of children’s placement and the “Forteto” community (for instance, it appears from public documents that the guardian of the children and some members of the Youth Court are members of the “Forteto” foundation; moreover, the latter participates together with the public authorities and the social services in the management of a centre assisting the tribunal in the placement of children, the centre being hosted by the community itself). In the light of this, information was requested by the Committee of Ministers on measures envisaged to ensure that the authorities involved in the implementation and supervision of placements of children enjoy the necessary independence from the “Forteto” community. In June 2002, the Superior Judicial Council decided that the involvement in the co-operative community « Il Forteto » of two members of the Youth Court did not raise any incompatibility issue, as long as these persons had not taken part in the decisions concerning the placement of the applicant’s children in the « Forteto ».

As regards the question raised of how it happened that people convicted of sexual abuse and ill-treatment were still managing a community entrusted with the care of children, the Italian Delegation explained that these people had been granted a stay of execution; in any event, any ban would no longer be applicable, as the convictions occurred a long time ago. Furthermore, these people would only be involved nowadays in the commercial activities of the Forteto and not in those related to children, according to the Italian Delegation. The Secretariat has inquired how situations such as this can be prevented in the future (see for details CM/Inf(2001)12, CM/Del/Act(2001)741).

Sub-section 4.3

- 2150 cases concerning the length of judicial proceedings

(see also for more detailed information, CM/Inf(98)29, CM/Inf(98)40, CM/Inf(99)37, CM/Inf(2000)40, CM/Inf(2000)40-Add, CM/Inf(2001)37 and CM/Inf(2002)47 and Addendum ; Interim Resolutions DH(97)336, DH(99)436, DH(99)437 and ResDH(2000)135)[82]

                   Addendum 4, volume 1

In all the 2150 cases against Italy listed in the Addendum 4, volume 1, violations of Article 6§1 were found on account of the excessive length of civil proceedings (1562 cases), execution proceedings (7 cases), administrative proceedings (108 cases) labour proceedings (363 cases), criminal proceedings (106 cases) and criminal proceedings combined with proceedings for damages (4 cases).

General measures: Following the numerous and continuous findings of violations of the right to a trial within a reasonable time, comprehensive reforms of the Italian judicial system have been under way since the end of the eighties and notably since the Committee of Ministers found, in 1997 (cf. Interim Resolution DH(97)336), that the previously enacted measures had been ineffective. These measures however have not so far solved the problem of the excessive length of judicial proceedings in Italy.

The new general measures required and under way in the fields of civil and administrative justice were presented in Interim Resolutions DH(99)436 and DH(99)437. Subsequently, the examination was also extended to criminal justice.

A first assessment was made in October 2000 and was presented in Interim Resolution ResDH(2000)135. In this resolution, the Committee of Ministers, considering the size of the problem, decided among other things “to resume its consideration of the progress made, at least at yearly intervals, on the basis of a comprehensive report to be presented each year by the Italian authorities”.

The first annual report, provided by the Italian authorities (covering mainly the year 2000 (up to 2001 for criminal proceedings), issued as public document CM/Inf(2001)37) was examined by the Committee at its 764th, 775th and 803rd meetings (October 2001, February and July 2002).

The Committee reached the following conclusions (the press releases issued after the above-mentioned meetings are reproduced in CM/Inf(2002)47-Add):

• As regards the global reform of civil and administrative proceedings, the information contained in the report appeared relatively encouraging;
• As regards criminal proceedings, the Committee took note of the entry into force of certain important legislative reforms as well as of certain other draft reforms; it requested details on the expected impact of these measures on the length of proceedings but regretted the fact that the statistics available did not make it possible to conclude that there had been any significant progress in the efficiency of the criminal justice;
• As regards in particular the resources and internal organisation of tribunals, the Italian authorities were invited to indicate in detail whether the measures mentioned in the report concerned both criminal and civil jurisdictions and what measures were planned to fill the posts of justices of the peace still vacant (around 50% of the total number of posts);
• As regards the oldest cases (those already pending in 1995) the Committee took note of the special measures taken (Sezioni stralcio);
• As regards the question of domestic remedies the Committee expressed its perplexity at the facts that the “Pinto Act” allowed compensation of victims of excessively long proceedings but did not provide any possibility of accelerating proceedings and that the application of this Act posed a risk of aggravating the backlog of the appeal courts.

In view of these findings, the Committee decided to resume consideration of the issue in December 2002, on the basis of a new annual report including comparable and updated statistical data, notably on criminal justice.

The new annual report (CM/Inf(2002)47-add data for 2001 so that the Committee now has such data for both civil and criminal proceedings. It adds no information on administrative justice or on the situation before the Sezioni stralcio after 2000.

Sub-section 4.3

In the light of the information available the Secretariat has made the following preliminary observations:

• As regards civil proceedings, the report tends to indicate that the progress earlier observed slowed down between 2000 and 2001, even reversing into a deterioration as regards certain courts and procedures:  the length of proceedings before justices of peace has increased (+13%); this is also the case before courts of appeal (most importantly an increase of +108% in labour law proceedings). In particular, it appears that the average cumulative length of civil proceedings from first to last instance has increased since 2000 by more than three months (respectively 1970 and 2067 days, including around 800 days – i.e. more than two years – on average before the Court of cassation only);
• As regards criminal proceedings, no new statistics are presented in comparison with those presented in July 2002 and the conclusions reached on the basis of the first annual report remain unchanged. Of concern is notably the fact that the average length of proceedings before the Court of cassation doubled between 1996 and 2001 (from 135 to 234/272 days on average);
• As regards the ongoing legislative reforms, the report mentions some twenty new measures envisaged, including notably the reform of the criminal code and of the codes of criminal and civil procedure. Progress appears to have been made in the computerisation of the courts, although the programme is at present blocked not least because of lack of funding. Progress has also been made in the adoption of awareness-raising measures for the legal community. In addition, the opinion of the Supreme Judicial Council is expected on the proposal to extend to all Italian courts the measures concerning the internal organisation of judicial work which were successfully tested in Turin and aimed at speeding up the handling of the oldest cases (“Strasbourg programme”);
• As regards national remedies, the Italian authorities indicate that they are planning to modify the “Pinto Act” to ensure that victims of violations may not only get compensation before the domestic courts, but also a possibility of obtaining the acceleration of pending procedures.

(See also, for detailed information on the measures enacted or planned by the Italian authorities, Memorandum CM/Inf(98)29 of 28 August 1998, CM/Inf(98)40 of 27 October 1998, CM/Inf(99)37 of 6/07/1999, Memorandum CM/Inf(2000)40 and CM/Inf(2000)40-Add as well as Addendum 4, volume 1 to this Annotated Agenda and order of business, the second Italian annual report CM/Inf(2002)47 and the Secretariat addendum (CM/Inf(2002)47-Add).

Individual measures: the Italian authorities have been invited to provide information on the cases indicated as still pending at domestic level at the time the violation was found by the European Court of Human Rights, and to adopt appropriate measures in order to speed up these proceedings. According to the information provided, only around a third of the proceedings examined by the Committee of Ministers would still be pending before the domestic courts today, while roughly half of them were pending when the violation of the Convention was found. In addition, the pending cases having led to a conviction by the Court are now brought to the attention of the competent domestic courts and receive, where possible, accelerated treatment.

- 4 cases against Turkey

H46-2768     25781          Cyprus against Turkey, judgment of 10/05/01 – Grand Chamber

The case relates to the situation that has existed in northern Cyprus since the conduct of military operations there by Turkey in July and August 1974 and the continuing division of the territory of Cyprus. The European Court of Human Rights held that the matters complained of by Cyprus in its application entailed Turkey’s responsibility under the European Convention on Human Rights.

The Court held that there had been the following 14 violations of the Convention:

Greek-Cypriot missing persons and their relatives

-           a continuing violation of Article 2 (right to life) of the Convention concerning the failure of the authorities of the respondent State to conduct an effective investigation into the whereabouts and fate of Greek-Cypriot missing persons who disappeared in life-threatening circumstances;

-           a continuing violation of Article 5 (right to liberty and security) concerning the failure of the Turkish authorities to conduct an effective investigation into the whereabouts and fate of the Greek-Cypriot missing persons in respect of whom there was an arguable claim that they were in Turkish custody at the time of their disappearance;

Sub-section 4.3

-           a continuing violation of Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment) in that the silence of the Turkish authorities in the face of the real concerns of the relatives attained a level of severity which could only be categorised as inhuman treatment.

Home and property of displaced persons

-           a continuing violation of Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life, home and correspondence) concerning the refusal to allow the return of any Greek-Cypriot displaced persons to their homes in northern Cyprus;

-           a continuing violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property) concerning the fact that Greek-Cypriot owners of property in northern Cyprus were being denied access to and control, use and enjoyment of their property as well as any compensation for the interference with their property rights;

-          a violation of Article 13 (right to an effective remedy) concerning the failure to provide to Greek Cypriots not residing in northern Cyprus any remedies to contest interferences with their rights under Article 8 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.

Living conditions of Greek Cypriots in Karpas region of northern Cyprus

-           a violation of Article 9 (freedom of thought, conscience and religion) in respect of Greek Cypriots living in northern Cyprus, concerning the effects of restrictions on freedom of movement which limited access to places of worship and participation in other aspects of religious life;

-           a violation of Article 10 (freedom of expression) in respect of Greek Cypriots living in northern Cyprus in so far as school-books destined for use in their primary school were subject to excessive measures of censorship;

-           a continuing violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 in respect of Greek Cypriots living in northern Cyprus in that their right to the peaceful enjoyment of their possessions was not secured in case of their permanent departure from that territory and in that, in case of death, inheritance rights of relatives living in southern Cyprus were not recognized;

-           a violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 (right to education) in respect of Greek Cypriots living in northern Cyprus in so far as no appropriate secondary-school facilities were available to them;

-           a violation of Article 3 in that the Greek Cypriots living in the Karpas area of northern Cyprus had been subjected to discrimination amounting to degrading treatment;

-           a violation of Article 8 concerning the right of Greek Cypriots living in northern Cyprus to respect for their private and family life and to respect for their home;

-            a violation of Article 13 by reason of the absence of remedies in respect of interferences by the authorities, as a matter of practice, with the rights of Greek Cypriots living in northern Cyprus under Articles 3, 8, 9 and 10 of the Convention and Articles 1 and 2 of Protocol No. 1.

Rights of Turkish Cypriots living in northern Cyprus

-           a violation of Article 6 (right to a fair trial) on account of the legislative practice of authorizing the trial of civilians by military courts.

The Court also decided, unanimously, that the question of the possible application of Article 41 (just satisfaction) of the Convention was not ready for decision and adjourned consideration thereof.

The Deputies examined this case for the first time at their 760^th meeting (July 2001) (see the records of the 760^th meeting).

During the second examination of the case at the 764^th meeting (October 2001) delegations strongly supported the proposal made by the Delegation of Liechtenstein that the Committee should follow the approach already proposed by the Director General of human rights at the 760^th meeting, that is identifying specific categories of violations according to the complexity of the execution measures required:

-      the question of missing persons,

-      the living conditions of Greek Cypriots in northern Cyprus,

-      the rights of Turkish Cypriots living in northern Cyprus,

-      the question of the homes and property of displaced persons.

The Liechtenstein Delegation proposed that Delegations concentrate on some of the violations presented under the heading “Living conditions of Greek Cypriots in northern Cyprus” specifically in the Karpas region, as well as the problem of the powers of the military courts presented under heading “Rights of Turkish Cypriots living in northern Cyprus”. As indicated by the Chairman in his summing-up, the procedure adopted for the examination of this case should not prevent the Deputies from pursuing in parallel an examination of the other issues raised in the Court’s Judgment.

Sub-section 4.3

At the 783^rd meeting (February 2002), the Delegation of Turkey stated that it was in agreement with the approach suggested at the 764^th meeting.

At the 792nd meeting, it was noted that a large number of Delegations consider that the question of missing persons should be examined as a matter of priority. At the same meeting the Delegation of Turkey gave a certain amount of information which has been distributed at its request, to all Delegations. The Delegation of Turkey notably indicated that the legislative practice of authorising the trial of civilians by military courts no longer took place: judges who sit on courts which try civilians are chosen from civilian judges by an independent body whose members themselves are civilians.

At the 798^th meeting, the discussions focused in particular on the situation of missing persons and the role played by the Committee on Missing Persons in Cyprus (CMP). Whilst the Turkish Delegation underlined the importance of the CMP, the contribution of Turkey to the work of the CMP and the necessity of reactivating it, several other delegations referred to the text of the Court’s judgment. In fact, in its judgment, the Court considers “that the respondent State’s procedural obligation at issue cannot be discharged through its contribution to the investigatory work of the CMP … (and) it notes that, although the CMP’s procedures are undoubtedly useful for the humanitarian purpose for which they were established, they are not of themselves sufficient to meet the standard of an effective investigation required by Article 2 of the Convention, especially in view of the narrow scope of that body’s investigations”.

At the 810th meeting (October 2002) the Greek Delegation asked that special attention be given to the “living conditions of Greek Cypriots in northern Cyprus” at the 819th meeting.

H54-2769     15318          Loizidou, judgments of 18/12/96 (merits) and 28/07/98 (just satisfaction) – Interim Resolutions DH(99)680, DH(2000)105 and ResDH(2001)80

                                      Addendum 4, volume 1

At the present stage of the examination of the case the Deputies have decided to concentrate on the question of payment of the just satisfaction awarded in the last-mentioned judgment on account of the violation of the applicant’s right to the peaceful enjoyment of certain properties located in the Northern part of Cyprus (violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1). The Court specified that payment was to take place within 3 months, i.e. before 28/10/1998.

Just satisfaction: As Turkey did not pay the just satisfaction awarded, the Chairman of the Committee of Ministers, the Icelandic Minister of Foreign Affairs, on 22/06/1999 wrote to his Turkish counterpart expressing the Committee’s concern regarding the failure to execute the judgment.

Payment still not taking place, the Committee adopted, on 06/10/1999, Interim Resolution DH(99)680, strongly urging Turkey to review its position and to pay the just satisfaction awarded. As payment still remained outstanding, the Chairman of the Committee, the Irish Minister of Foreign Affairs, wrote a new letter on 04/04/2000 to his Turkish counterpart reiterating the Committee’s expectation that Turkey ensure payment in the near future. The reply of the Turkish Ministers of Foreign Affairs indicated that Turkey did not consider itself to have either the competence or the jurisdiction to execute the Court’s judgment.

On 12/07/2000, the Deputies, in response, adopted a new Interim Resolution DH(2000)105, declaring that the refusal of Turkey to execute the judgment of the Court demonstrates a manifest disregard for its international obligations, both as a High Contracting Party to the Convention and as a member State of the Council of Europe and insisted strongly, in view of the gravity of the matter, that Turkey comply fully and without any further delay with the European Court of Human Rights’ judgment of 28/07/1998.

At the 749^th meeting (April 2001) the Turkish Delegation presented a payment proposal subjected, however, to conditions deemed unacceptable by the other Delegations.

Payment not taking place the Committee adopted on 26/06/2001 a new Interim Resolution ResDH(2001)80 in which it recalled its previous Interim Resolutions and stated:

“Very deeply deploring the fact that, to date, Turkey has still not complied with its obligations under this judgment;

Stressing that every member State of the Council of Europe must accept the principles of the rule of law and of the enjoyment by all persons within its jurisdiction of human rights and fundamental freedoms;

Sub-section 4.3

Stressing that acceptance of the Convention, including the compulsory jurisdiction of the Court and the binding nature of its judgments, has become a requirement for membership of the organisation;

Stressing that the Convention is a system for the collective enforcement of the rights protected therein,

Declares the Committee’s resolve to ensure, with all means available to the organization, Turkey’s compliance with its obligations under this judgment,

Calls upon the authorities of the member States to take such action as they deem appropriate to this end.”

When the Deputies examined the matter at their 783^rd meeting (February 2002), the Turkish Delegation reiterated the proposal made at the 749^th meeting. Recalling that the conditions attaching to this proposal were unacceptable, several delegations presented proposals in order to make possible progress on the payment question.

The Deputies at the 792nd meeting (April 2002), different proposals regarding payment of the sums awarded were discussed. The proposals examined were mainly based on the idea of a payment to the Council of Europe, which organisation should forward the sums, including default interest, to the applicant. The Delegations of Greece and Cyprus objected to such a payment method as it would not correspond to the Court’s judgment, which ordered payment to the applicant. Several Delegations asked Turkey to provide further clarifications as to the exact content of its own payment proposal.

The Chairman also presented to the Deputies a letter from the applicant in which she expressed her frustration and anguish about Turkey’s unwillingness to comply with the judgment and asked to be authorised to address the Committee in person at a forthcoming meeting. A short discussion followed indicating that the Deputies were not inclined to grant the request. A negative reply has subsequently been sent by the Chair to the applicant.

For procedural reasons, the merits of the case could not be examined at the 796th meeting (May 2002) and the examination was postponed to the 798th DH meeting (June 2002). The Chairman indicated that he would in the meantime continue his consultations with interested Delegations. At the 798th (June 2002) and 803rd (July 2002) and 810th (October 2002) meetings no new information regarding the payment was available.

The texts of the Interim Resolutions adopted in this case appear in Addendum 4, volume 1.

H46-2770     26308          Institut de Prêtres français and others, judgment of 14/12/00 – Friendly settlement

                                      Addendum 4, volume 2

The case concerns a Turkish judicial decision of 1993 annulling the applicant Institute’s property entitlement to a plot of land on the grounds that, by letting part of this land to a private company, the applicant Institute was no longer eligible for special treatment as a non-profit body (complaints under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 and Article 9). The parties concluded a friendly settlement according to which the Government undertook the following obligations:

- The Treasury and the Directorate General of Foundations recognise the right to usufruct to the benefit of the priests representing the applicant Institute. This right to usufruct shall comprise the full use and enjoyment of the land and the buildings thereon and the right to rent the land for profit-making purposes in order to meet its needs;

- The two above-mentioned state authorities agree to undertake the formalities necessary to register their respective declarations in the land register with a view to renewing the life tenancy in favour of the priests who will replace the current usufructuary;

- The Directorate General of Foundations waives its claim to USD 41,670 owed by the applicant Institute in rent collected over the five years since its property title was annulled.

In October 2001, the applicant Institute indicated to the Secretariat that the Government had still not complied with the terms of the friendly settlement. The applicant thus requested that the appropriate action be taken without further delay by the authorities and that in particular:

- the Government should give instruction for registering in the land register the right to usufruct to the benefit of the current representative of the Church, Father Alain Fontaine;

- the Government should ensure that the General Directorate of Foundations immediately ceases the collection of the rents and recognises the applicant’s right to usufruct;

- the Treasury should withdraw its claim for compensation for illegal occupation of the plot.

Sub-section 4.3

The necessity of an urgent solution to these issues has been stressed in the Committee of Ministers at each of its DH meetings since October 2001 and the Turkish authorities have been invited to take the necessary measures without further delay. The Turkish Delegation indicated at each of these meetings that the above-mentioned problems were going to be solved, notably through a Decree by the Prime Minister. During the two last examinations of the case (798^th meeting, June 2002 and 803^rd meeting, July) the Turkish Delegation stated that the national authorities were engaged in negotiations with the applicant Institute in order to establish the division of rent between the State and the applicants. However, these negotiations have so far led to no conclusive result and the friendly settlement still remains unexecuted by the Government (more than a year and a half since the Court's judgment).

In view of these persistent problems, it was decided at the 810th meeting (October 2002) that the Chairman-in-office of the Committee of Ministers write a letter to her Turkish counterpart with a view to conveying to him the Committee’s concern at the non-execution of the friendly settlement concluded in this case and to requesting a rapid solution to the problem. This letter was sent on 6/11/2002 (see Addendum 4, volume 2). At the time of issuing the present annotated Agenda, the Secretariat had not yet received an answer to this letter and no new information regarding the execution of the friendly settlement was available.

H46-2771     29900+        Sadak, Zana, Dicle and Doğan, judgment of 17/07/01

                                     Addendum 4, volume 2

The case concerns the violation of the right to a fair trial in proceedings before the Ankara State Security Court, which sentenced the four applicants, members of the Turkish Grand National Assembly, to 15 years’ imprisonment in December 1994.

The violations found are the following:

- lack of independence and impartiality of the tribunal due to the presence of a military judge on the bench of the State Security Court (violation of Article 6§1 - see §40 of the judgment);

- lack of timely information about the legal redefinition of the accusation brought against the applicants and lack of sufficient time and facilities to prepare the applicants’ defence (violation of Article 6§3 a and b taken together with Article 6§1 - see §§57-59 of the judgment);

- impossibility to examine or to have examined the witnesses who testified against the applicants (violation of Article 6§3d taken together with Article 6§1 - see §§67-68 of the judgment).

Having found these violations, the Court did not consider it necessary to decide separately the applicants’ complaints under Articles 10, 11 and 14.

Individual measures:

Background: In view of the extent of the violations of the right to a fair trial and of their consequences for the applicants, the Turkish authorities were requested, at the 764^th meeting (October 2001), to consider urgently specific individual measures to erase these consequences. (cf. Committee of Ministers’ Recommendation R(2000)2 and its Interim Resolution DH(2001)106 on the individual measures in cases concerning freedom of expression in Turkey).

The Turkish authorities initially informed the Committee (at the 775^th meeting, December 2001) that possibilities for re-opening domestic proceedings following the European Court’s judgments would be shortly introduced through legislation. However, at the 783^rd meeting (February 2002), the Turkish Delegation indicated that preparation of the draft law in question had been adjourned but that the Turkish authorities were continuing to seek ways to adopt the necessary individual measures in the present case. Many delegations expressed their disappointment at the fact that the new legislation, which was of such urgency for the execution of the present judgment, had been adjourned and deplored the fact that no specific measure had yet been taken in respect of the applicants. Some delegations furthermore stressed that the execution of the judgment was being attentively observed by the Parliamentary Assembly (cf. AS(2002)CR2) and outside the Council of Europe, notably by the European Union.

Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)59: At the 794^th meeting (30 April 2002), as no progress in the execution of the judgment was reported on this point, the Committee of Ministers adopted Interim Resolution in which it

- Strongly urges the Turkish authorities, without further delay, to respond to the Committee’s repeated demands that the said authorities urgently remedy the applicants’ situation and take the necessary measures in order to reopen the proceedings impugned by the Court in this case, or other ad hoc measures erasing the consequences for the applicants of the violations found;

Sub-section 4.3

-Decides, in view of the urgency of the situation, to resume its control of the adoption of these individual measures, if necessary at each of its meetings.

At the 798^th (June 2002) and 803^rd (July 2002) meetings, the Turkish delegation stated that the authorities were still considering the introduction of a possibility for reopening of proceedings through legislation.

At the 807^th meting (September 2002), the Representative of Turkey presented the reforms adopted by the Parliament on 3 August 2002 and the Deputies specifically considered the amendments to the Codes of Criminal and Civil Procedure, which concern the reopening of domestic proceedings. Disappointment was expressed at the fact that that the four applicants in the present case – who continue to serve their 15-year prison sentences and to suffer the consequences of the violations found – will not be able to benefit from the newly adopted provisions (the latter will be applicable only to new cases lodged with the European Court after their entry into force, i.e. after 3 August 2003). The necessity for urgent action to grant the applicants the appropriate redress has been accordingly strongly reiterated.

Draft New Interim Resolution: At the 810th meeting (October 2002), as no concrete action in this respect have been reported, the Secretariat was mandated to prepare a new draft Interim Resolution for the 819th meeting of the Deputies (3-5 December 2002). At the time of issuing the present annotated agenda, the Secretariat had not received any new information concerning the granting to the applicants of appropriate redress for the violations found. The aforementioned draft Interim Resolution appears in Addendum 4, volume 2 to the present annotated agenda.

Chairman's Replies to the Parliamentary Assembly: In replying to the parliamentary questions at the 3rd part session of the Parliamentary Assembly (25/06/2002), the Chairman of the Committee of Ministers notably recalled the Turkish Government’s undertaking made a long time ago to introduce judicial means for reopening domestic proceedings found to have violated the Convention and the fact that this undertaking had not been met. She undertook to raise the matter personally with the Turkish Foreign Minister (see AS(2002)CR18). In her communication given at the Assembly's 4th part session (24/09/2002), the Chairman stated that the Sadak and others judgment was the first question that she raised with the Turkish Foreign Minister during their informal meeting in New York on 11 September 2002. The Turkish Minister made it clear that he grasped the full importance of the question, and promised to think it over and take it up with the relevant authorities.

Decisions by the Parliamentary Assembly: At its 4th part session (23/09/2002) the Parliamentary Assembly held a debate and adopted a Resolution and a Recommendation on the implementation of the Court's judgments by Turkey. The relevant parts of the texts adopted read as follows:

Resolution 1297(2002):

"10. The Assembly deeply regrets that the new legislation on reopening of proceedings adopted by Turkey in August 2002 expressly excludes any possibility of complying with the Court's judgment in the Sadak, Zana, Dicle and Dogan case, so that the four applicants will continue to serve their 15 year prison sentences imposed following an unfair trial. It strongly supports the Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights’ demand to urgently remedy the applicants' situation either by making this new legislation immediately applicable to all pending cases or by adopting ad hoc measures in the applicants' favour. In case the applicants' situation is not rectified, the Assembly will consider the consequences of such a refusal at its session in April 2003."

Recommendation 1576(2002):

"1. The Assembly (…) urges the Committee of Ministers to take all necessary measures to ensure the execution of the Court’s decisions without delay, notably by ensuring that the recent legislation of reopening of proceedings enters immediately into force and is made applicable to all cases pending before the Committee of Ministers for control of execution under Article 46 of the Convention;

(…)

5. Finally, with respect to the Sakak, Zana, Dicle and Doğan case, the Assembly referring to its Resolution 1297 (2002) and to Turkey’s obligation under the Convention to take concrete measures to remedy the consequences of the violation found by the Court, urges the Committee of Ministers to use all means at its disposal to ensure compliance with the judgment without further delay."

Sub-section 4.3

General measures:

Information has been requested with regard to the measures the Turkish authorities envisage with a view to preventing new, similar violations. The Turkish authorities have informed the Committee that some reforms had already been adopted and certain others were under way.

As regards the specific problem relating to the lack of independence and impartiality of the State Security courts, general measures have already been adopted within the constitutional reform which replaced the military judge on State Security Courts by a civil judge (see the Çiraklar against Turkey case, judgment of 28/10/1998, Resolution DH (99) 555). As regards the right to a fair trial in general, this right received constitutional protection as a result of an amendment to Article 36 of the Constitution on 17/10/2001.

SECTION 5 - SUPERVISION OF GENERAL MEASURES ALREADY ANNOUNCED

(See Addendum 5 for part or all these cases)

Action

The Deputies are invited to supervise progress in the adoption of general measures aiming at preventing further similar violations to those found by the Court in the following cases. If necessary, supplementary information on some or all the cases listed below will appear in Addendum 5. The Deputies are invited to resume consideration of these cases in 6 months at the latest.

                   SUB-SECTION 5.1 – LEGISLATIVE AND/OR REGULATORY CHANGES

- 5 cases against Austria

H46-2772     33730          Weixelbraun, judgment of 20/12/01, final on 20/03/02

H54-2773     20602          Szücs, judgment of 24/11/97

H46-2774     28923          Lamanna, judgment of 10/07/01, final on 10/10/01

H54-2775     21835          Werner, judgment of 24/11/97

H46-2776     28389          Asan Rushiti, judgment of 21/03/00, final on 21/06/00

These cases concern the lack of public hearing and of any public pronouncement of the decisions in proceedings concerning the applicants’ compensation claims in respect of their detention on remand (violations of Article 6§1). The Asan Rushiti case also concerns a violation of the presumption of innocence in these proceedings (violation of Article 6§2). The Lamanna and Weixelbraun cases only concern the violation of Article 6§2.

General measures: the judgments of the European Court in the cases of Szücs, Werner and Lamanna have been published in the newsletter of the Österreichisches Institut für Menschenrechte and the Österreichische Juristen-Zeitung. The Austrian authorities informed the Committee of Ministers that the case-law of the Supreme Court has been developed taking into account the judgments of the European Court. Furthermore, changes were introduced to the Code of Criminal Procedure in 2000. Finally, the Committee has also been informed that an amendment of the 1969 Compensation (Criminal Proceedings) Act (see § 19 of the Court’s judgment) is under examination. The Committee has asked to be kept informed of any development in this field.

- 4 cases against Belgium

H46-2777     34989          Goedhart, judgment of 20/03/01, final on 20/06/01[83]

H46-2778     36449+        Stroek, judgment of 20/03/01, final on 20/06/01[84]

H54-2779     25357          Aerts, judgment of 30/07/98[85]

H46-2780     26103          Van Geyseghem, judgment of 21/01/99[86]

- 3 cases against Bulgaria

H46-2781     40061          M.S., judgment of 04/07/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-2782     31365          Varbanov, judgment of 05/10/00

These cases concern the applicants' unlawful detention in psychiatric hospitals, in that their detention were ordered by prosecutors on the basis of an unpublished instruction by the Chief Public Prosecutor (Guidelines No. 295/85) without seeking prior medical opinion on the applicants' state of mental health (violation of or complaint under Article 5§1). The Varbanov case also concerns the fact that the applicant had no opportunity to bring judicial proceedings to challenge the lawfulness of his detention (violation of Article 5§4).

General measures: The Varbanov judgment was communicated to the Ministry of Health and to the Congress of Bulgarian Psychiatrists in November 2000 and will be published (in Bulgarian translation) in the Bulletin of the Ministry of Justice. The judgment was also brought to the attention of the expert group working on a new bill on public health (see below). At the 732nd meeting (December 2000), the attention of the Bulgarian authorities was drawn to the fact that the violations found in the Varbanov case were due mostly to shortcomings in the legislation. First, there was no legislation or regulation providing the necessity to obtain a medical opinion before or, in case of urgent arrest, immediately after a prosecutor’s order to detain a person for compulsory medical examination (cf. the requirements of Article 5 in § 47 of the judgment). Furthermore, the law does not allow the detainee (cf. § 32 of the judgment) to challenge the prosecutor’s order to detain

Sub-section 5.1

him for a compulsory medical examination before a judge. At the 775th bis meeting (8 January 2002), the Bulgarian Delegation indicated that the bill on public health, which aims at remedying the problems indicated above, would soon be put on the agenda of Parliament. The Delegation subsequently indicated that another bill on mental health was being prepared to grant adequate safeguards to mentally ill persons (notably a preliminary medical examination and judicial review). Copies of these bills have been requested. At the time of issuing the present annotated agenda, the Secretariat had not yet received the texts in question.

H46-2783     30985          Hassan and Tchaouch, judgment of 26/10/00 - Grand Chamber

The case concerns the State’s arbitrary interference in the internal organisation of a divided Muslim community, due to the replacement of its recognised leadership and to subsequent refusals to register Mr Hassan as the new, legitimate leader of a faction of the Muslim community. This interference was based on legal provisions which did not meet the required standards of clarity and predictability and allowed unfettered discretion to the executive (violation of Article 9). The case also concerns the fact that the Supreme Court did not examine the lawfulness of the Government’s decree (R 12) violating freedom of religion and the repeated refusal of the Bulgarian Council of Ministers to comply with the Supreme Court’s judgments quashing the refusal to register the new leadership of the community (violation of Article 13).

General measures: in view of §§85-86 of the judgment of the European Court, the Bulgarian authorities have been invited to consider general measures to bring the Religious Denominations Act of 1949 into conformity with the requirements of clarity and predictability required by Article 9 of the Convention (cf. §§84-85 of the judgment). Moreover, attention has been drawn to the problem of the absence of effective judicial supervision of executive decisions (see §§100-101 of the judgment). Accordingly, the Bulgarian authorities have also been requested to consider both interim and long-term measures to ensure a substantial and effective judicial supervision of the decisions taken by the executive.

In 2000, the National Assembly adopted on first reading a new draft Religious Denomination Act. According to the Council of Europe’s expert opinion provided in February 2001, the new Bill contains certain improvements when compared to the existing law. However, the opinion also highlights a number of outstanding problems as regards the compatibility of the Bill with Article 9 of the Convention; it was noted in particular that the Bill still grants too much discretion to the authorities in regulating the freedom of religion.

During the last examination of the case (798th meeting, June 2002), the Bulgarian delegation confirmed that the Parliamentary Committee which was mandated to prepare a new draft law, was duly aware of both the European Court's judgment and the Council of Europe expert opinions. The Delegation furthermore indicated that three possible bills on religious denominations, which were introduced before this Parliamentary Committee, should be shortly consolidated in a single Bill to be submitted to Parliament. At the time of issuing the present annotated Agenda, no new information regarding the progress of the parliamentary proceedings had been made available to the Secretariat.

- 2 cases against Finland

H46-2785     29346          K.S., judgment of 31/05/01, final on 12/12/01[87]

H46-2786     31764          K.P., judgment of 31/05/01, final on 05/09/01[88]

These two cases concern infringements of the right to a fair trial in proceedings instigated by the applicants to obtain certain social allowances. The Insurance Court dismissed the applicants’ claims on the basis of opinions which were not communicated to the applicants, who were therefore unable to answer them (violation of Article 6§1).

General measures: At the 775th and 792nd DH meetings (December 2001 and April 2002) the Delegation of Finland indicated that the judgments would soon be published, and that from now on the applicant’s opinion in this type of case would be requested. Written information on these measures is awaited.

Sub-section 5.1

- 3 cases against Lithuania

H46-2787     42095          Daktaras, judgment of 10/10/00, final on 18/01/01

This case concerns the lack of objective impartiality of the Supreme Court in criminal proceedings against the applicant, in that the President of the Criminal Division of the Supreme Court had nominated the judge rapporteur and the members of the chamber set up to examine an appeal on points of law he had himself lodged aiming to set aside a judgment on appeal and to confirm the applicant’s conviction at first instance (violation of Article 6§1).

General measures: By a letter dated 15/10/02, the Lithuanian Delegation indicated that the draft of the new Code of Criminal Procedure will no longer contain any provision enabling a judge to combine several functions. The Code should come into force in the first half of 2003.

H46-2788     44558          Valašinas, judgment of 24/07/01, final on 24/10/01

This case concerns among other things the degrading treatment to which the applicant was subjected as well as an infringement of his right to respect for his correspondence. The Court considered that the body-search performed on the applicant, in detention in May 1998, had showed a clear lack of respect for the applicant, and in effect diminished his human dignity (violation of Article 3). The Court also found that the control of the applicant’s correspondence with the organs of the Convention had amounted to an unjustified interference with the right to respect for correspondence (violation of Article 8).

The applicant was released following a presidential pardon.  

General measures: By a letter dated 14/10/03, the Lithuanian Delegation indicated that some modifications had already been adopted: detainees’ correspondence will no longer be censored unless so decided by a court or the prosecutor, but never correspondence with the Convention’s institutions. Furthermore, the conditions of the search of detainees are now regulated. The Prison Code which contains these provisions will be replaced by a new Code of enforcement of sentences, which should come into force in the first half of 2003. It has been indicated that it could be useful to disseminate the judgment of the European Court, notably to prison authorities.

H46-1024     44800          Puzinas, judgment of 14/03/02, final on 14/06/02

The case concerns unjustified censorship by prison authorities of the applicant's correspondence (violation of Article 8) and presents similarities to the case of Valašinas against Lithuania (judgment of 24/07/01), in which the necessary general measures are being adopted by the Lithuanian authorities (see above).

- 1 case against Luxembourg

H46-2789     38432          Thoma, judgment of 29/03/01, final on 29/06/01

This case concerns the fact that, in convicting the applicant, a journalist, of a breach of his obligation to provide bona fide information to the public, the competent domestic judges only had regard to the quotation by the applicant of a litigious passage of an article written by a fellow journalist and found, solely on this basis, that the applicant had adopted the allegation contained in the quoted text (corruption of an identifiable category of civil servants), on the ground that he had failed formally to distance himself from it. The European Court considered that requiring journalists to distance themselves systematically and formally from the content of a quotation that might insult or damage the reputation of a third party was not reconcilable with the press’s role of providing information on current events, opinions and ideas and therefore that the applicant’s conviction was disproportionate to the aim of protecting the reputation or rights of others (violation of Article 10).

General measures: The Luxembourg Delegation has sent the Secretariat a draft law on freedom of expression in the media and will communicate the date of adoption of this law. The European Court’s judgment has been disseminated to the relevant authorities and confirmation of its publication is awaited.

Sub-section 5.1

- 9 cases against Poland

H46-1034     27785          Włoch, judgment of 19/10/00, final on 22/01/01

The case concerns the unfairness of the judicial proceedings concerning the suit brought by the applicant, who was detained on remand, in order to regain his freedom. This was due to the facts that the applicant’s lawyers could not be present throughout the hearing and that he could not have access to the case-file at certain stages of proceedings (violations of Article 5§4).

General measures: At the 749th meeting (April 2001), the Representative of Poland indicated that, subsequent to the facts of the present case, the relevant provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure had been modified so as to prevent violations of the Convention and that the Ministry of Justice was preparing a circular to courts with a view to drawing their attention to the present judgment and to the rules currently in force. He stated that copies of this circular and of the new legal provisions would be sent to the Secretariat. The latter has not yet received these texts.

H46-2790     27918          C., judgment of 03/05/01[89]

H46-2791     29691          Jedamski, judgment of 26/07/01, final on 26/10/01[90]

H46-2792     43779          Mączyński, judgment of 15/01/02, final on 15/04/02[91]

H54-2793     27916          Podbielski, judgment of 30/10/98[92]

H54-2794     28616          Styranowski, judgment of 30/10/98[93]

H46-2795     25693+        Sobczyk, judgment of 26/10/00, final on 26/01/01[94]

H46-2796     33082          Wojnowicz, judgment of 21/09/00, final on 22/01/01[95]

H46-2797     32734          Wasilewski, judgment of 21/12/00, final on 06/09/01[96]

- 1 case against Romania

H54-2798     27273          Petra, judgment of 23/09/98

The case concerns the opening and delaying of the applicant’s correspondence with the former European Commission of Human Rights and, in this respect, the latitude which the relevant law leaves to the national authorities to effect such acts (violation of article 8). It also relates to the fact that in his correspondence with the Commission, the applicant suffered hindrance in the exercise of his individual right of petition in the form of illegitimate and unacceptable pressure from the prison authorities (violation of former article 25).

General measures: The judgment of the European Court was published in the official gazette and the Romanian Delegation has transmitted a copy of a circular addressed to prison administrations concerning the right to respect of prisoners’ correspondence. The Secretariat is awaiting information about legislative measures concerning the “execution of sentences of imprisonment”, and especially about the provisions relating to prisoners’ correspondence. At the 721st meeting, the Romanian Delegation indicated that the bill in question had been tabled but that the legislative modification had already been made by way of an order. At the 749th meeting, the Delegation stated that the “package” of bills, including one concerning the correspondence of detainees relevant to this case, had been withdrawn for examination by the new government. They will probably be presented for adoption later on. Information on these various points is awaited.

Restricted information: At the 764^th meeting (October 2001), the Deputies asked the Secretariat to prepare a draft interim resolution, but at the 775^th meeting (January 2002), the Romanian Delegation asked for a postponement, explaining that information would be provided very shortly.

Sub-section 5.1

- 1 case against Switzerland

H54-2799     19800          R.M.D., judgment of 26/09/97 - Interim Resolution DH(99)678

The case concerns the fact that the applicant could not obtain a review of the lawfulness of his detention pending trial because he was successively transferred from one canton to another, so that the courts of the transferring canton no longer had jurisdiction to decide the lawfulness of his detention (violation of Article 5§4).

General measures: On 08/10/1999, the Deputies adopted Interim Resolution DH(99)678 summarising all measures taken and envisaged and agreed to resume consideration of this case once certain legislative reforms were completed or at the latest in autumn 2001. At the 792nd meeting (April 2002), the Swiss Delegation indicated that the direct effect of the Convention and the Court’s case-law was sufficient to prevent similar violations in the future. The Delegation added that according to the Parliament schedule, the envisaged reforms could be tabled in 2004.

- 1 case against Turkey

H54-2807     18954          Zana, judgment of 25/11/97

The case concerns in particular the fact that the applicant could not appear in person at the hearing before the Court of Appeal which handed down his definitive prison sentence, and the excessive length of the relevant criminal proceedings (violations of Article 6§1).

General measures: The necessity to clarify the effect of Article 226§4 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which was at the origin of the violation of the right to a fair trial, was raised. In 1998, the Turkish authorities prepared a bill amending this provision. The new provision of the Code (Article 194) will allow a judge not to summon an accused to a hearing only if the latter agrees not to attend. According to the information provided by the Turkish delegation at the 760th meeting (July 2001), the draft law was being examined by parliament. At the 810th meeting (October 2002), the Turkish Delegation specified that the above-mentioned amendment was envisaged as a part of a broader reform of the Code of Criminal Procedure which should be adopted following the general elections of 3 November 2002.

- 2 cases against the United Kingdom

H46-2805     25594          Hashman and Harrup, judgment of 25/11/99 – Grand Chamber

The case concerns a “binding-over” order, imposed on the applicants for having disrupted a fox hunt, not to breach peace or behave contra bonos mores in the future, although their behaviour did not constitute any breach of peace. The Court considered that the binding-over order, based on the notion of “behaviour contra bonos mores”, did not comply with the Convention requirement that it be “prescribed by law” (violation of Article 10).

General measures: The United Kingdom authorities informed the Committee of Ministers that they remained committed to undertaking a full review of the law relating to binding over and, at the 775^th bis meeting (January 2002) they announced that a consultation document was being prepared to that effect and might be issued in October 2002. In the interim, the Crown Prosecution Service Casework Bulletin No. 6 of 2000 gave guidance to prosecutors that they should not ask a court to consider a binding-over order unless there is evidence of past conduct which, if repeated, is likely to cause a breach of the peace. The guidance also suggested that courts could be encouraged to ensure that the behaviour to be avoided was made quite clear in the order. In July 2002, the question was raised of whether any example of change in the case-law was already available as a result of these measures. Moreover, the judgment of the European Court had been published in several legal journals (inter alia: The Times Law Report, 1.10.98; European Human Rights Review, 1999, issue 1; Criminal Law Review, 1999, pp. 451-452).

Sub-section 5.1

H46-2806     26494          J.T., judgment of 30/03/00 - Friendly settlement

The Court took note of a friendly settlement reached between the government and the applicant, who was involuntarily detained in a psychiatric institution until 1996, and who complained of the legislation under which she was unable to obtain the change of the person appointed “nearest relative”, in her case, her mother with whom she was in conflict (complaint under Article 8).

General measures: The Government has undertaken to modify the legislation involved in this case so as to allow committed psychiatric patients to contest the status of "nearest relative" before a court if the patient submits reasonable objections to a person acting in such capacity. In addition, it would be provided that certain persons could be excluded from acting in the capacity of "nearest relative". The draft amendment containing these provisions has been transmitted to the Secretariat which is awaiting confirmation of the adoption of these measures. The judgment of the European Court has been published, but confirmation of the details of this publication is also awaited.

The government has also paid the applicant 500 pounds sterling as well as a sum corresponding to the reasonable costs she incurred at national level, but the date of the payment has not yet been confirmed.

                   SUB-SECTION 5.2 – CHANGES OF COURTS’ CASE-LAW OR OF ADMINISTRATIVE PRACTICE

- 1 case against France

H46-806       33592          Baumann, judgment of 22/05/01, final on 22/08/01

The case concerns an infringement of the applicant’s right of access to a court in order to obtain recognition of his right of property with respect to possessions seized and then confiscated by decision of a court (violation of Article 6§1). The case also concerns an infringement of the applicant’s right to liberty of movement, due to the seizure and then confiscation of his passport (violation of Article 2 Protocol No. 4).

Individual measure: Following the judgment of the European Court, which is directly applicable, the applicant has the possibility to lodge a request for restitution of his effects based on Articles 710 and 711 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

General measures: The European Court’s judgment has been sent to all Attorneys General of courts of appeal. Confirmation of publication is awaited. The issue concerning practical use of the right of appeal provided for in article 479 of the Code of Criminal Procedure remains to be examined. The dissemination of the judgement to examining magistrates is also expected. In addition, information is awaited concerning precisely how the appeal provided in Article 479 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is to be exercised (this information was requested at the first consideration of the case).

                   SUB-SECTION 5.3 – PUBLICATION / DISSEMINATION

- 1 case against Austria

H46-2808     32381          Baischer, judgment of 20/12/01, final on 20/03/02

The case concerns the absence of a public hearing in administrative criminal proceedings conducted in 1994 before an Independent Administrative Panel (Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat) against the applicant for an administrative offence under the Motor Vehicles Act (Kraftfahrgesetz) (violation of Article 6§1).

General measures: At the 798^th meeting, the Government was invited to publish the European Court’s judgment and disseminate it to Independent Administrative Panels.

- 1 case against Finland

H46-2809     25702          K. and T., judgment of 12/07/01 – Grand Chamber

This case concerns in particular the authorities’ failure to respect the applicants’ right to family life, first on account of the emergency care order concerning one of the applicants’ daughters and secondly on account of the failure to take proper steps to reunite the applicants’ family (violations of Article 8).

General measures: The judgment of the European Court has been widely disseminated to all relevant authorities. It has been suggested that it would be useful to issue a circular underlining §§ 168, 178 and 179 of the judgment and the alternative measures which could have been taken. Confirmation of the publication is awaited.

- 3 cases against France

H32-987       23321          Delbec I, Interim Resolution DH(98)15

The case concerns the infringement of the applicant’s right to her private life, in that she was deprived of her right to visit her children and was unable to obtain a review of her visiting rights because of the prefect’s refusal to disclose the address of her ex-husband (violation of Article 8).

General measures: Dissemination of the former European Commission’s report to préfectures, together with a letter explaining how this case was solved (giving the applicant the references of a lawyer representing the ex-husband) was requested at the 798th meeting (June 2002). Information is still awaited.

H46-2810     33951          Caloc, judgment of 20/07/00

The case concerns in particular the excessive length of certain criminal proceedings combined with civil action for damages (7 years) (violation of Article 6§1).

General measures: By a letter dated 11/06/2002, the French Delegation informed the Secretariat that the judgment of the European Court had been transmitted on 16/05/2002, to the General Prosecutor of the Court of Appeal of Fort-de-France for dissemination.

H32-2811     20282          G.B. I

The case concerns the unlawfulness of the applicant’s confinement to a mental hospital as well as the excessive length of subsequent criminal proceedings (violations of Articles 5§1 and 6§1).

General measures: The Secretariat is awaiting confirmation of the publication of the Commission’s report in a medical journal and/or the confirmation of its broad dissemination, with a circular letter, in medical circles. By letter of 19/02/2001, the French Delegation informed the Secretariat that the Ministry of Health had undertaken to disseminate the Commission’s report to the professionals concerned.

Sub-section 5.3

- 1 case against Lithuania

H46-2812     55479          Slezevicius, judgment of 13/11/01, final on 13/02/02

The case concerns the excessive length of criminal proceedings (more than 4 years and 2 months) against the applicant in connection with allegations of financial impropriety amounting to abuse of office whilst Prime Minister (violation of Article 6§1).

General measures: The judgment of the European Court was translated and published in the second edition of the Collection of the European Court of Human Right’s judgments in cases against the Lithuanian Republic (01/01/2001- 01/01/2002). The need for a wide dissemination of the judgment, notably to prosecutors, was mentioned at the 792nd meeting (April 2002) in order to avoid new, similar violations. Information is awaited on the progress made to that effect.

- 1 case against the Netherlands

H46-1026     32605          Rutten, judgment of 24/07/01, final on 24/10/01

The case concerns the fact that the decision to prolong the applicant’s confinement to a secure institution was given after the expiry of the time-limit provided for by national law and more than one month after the expiry of the initial confinement order. Moreover, it took the Court of Appeal more than three months to rule on the applicant’s subsequent appeal against this decision. According to domestic law, a confinement order remains in force as long as no final decision on a request for its prolongation has been taken. The European Court found that the lawfulness of the applicant’s detention was not decided “speedily” (violation of Article 5§4).

General measures: At the 783rd meeting (February 2002), the Government was invited to publish and disseminate the judgment of the European Court to the Arnhem Court of Appeal, to regional courts and to public prosecutors. The confirmation of the publication and dissemination is awaited.

- 1 case against Portugal

H46-2814     29813+        Almeida Garret, Mascarenhas Falcao and others, judgments of 11/01/00 and

                                      10/04/01

The applicants complained in particular of a breach of their right to the peaceful enjoyment of their possessions on account of the absence of any final compensation for the nationalisation and expropriation of their land (violation of Article 1, Protocol No. 1).

Individual measures: the Portuguese Government informed the Committee by a letter of 22 February 2002 of the payment of the final compensation after 24 years of national proceedings.

General measures: the Portuguese Government has informed the Committee that the judgment of the European Court has been circulated to all authorities concerned and that its publication is envisaged in the near future in a journal of comparative law. Precise details as to the date and the scope of the publication have been requested.

- 3 cases against the United Kingdom

H46-2816     32340          Curley, judgment of 28/03/00, final on 28/06/00

The case concerns the absence of a timely review by a court of the lawfulness of the applicant’s continued detention “at Her Majesty’s pleasure” after expiry of the tariff (violation of Article 5§4) and the fact that the applicant could not obtain compensation for that breach (violation of Article 5§5).

General Measures: With regard to the violation of Article 5§4, measures have already been adopted (see Resolutions DH(98)149 and DH(98)150 in the cases of Hussain and Singh respectively). With regard to the violation of Article 5§5, the Secretariat has received confirmation from the United Kingdom authorities that the applicant, if he so wishes, could lodge an application for compensation following the mechanisms provided for by the Human Rights Act. The publication of the judgment of the European Court has been requested.

Sub-section 5.3

H46-1068     29392          Z. and others, judgment of 10/05/01 – Grand Chamber

The case concerns, in particular, the failure of local authorities to fulfill their obligation to protect the applicants (minors at the time) from inhuman and degrading treatment inflicted by their parents (violation of Article 3) and the fact that they had no effective remedy in this respect (violation of Article 13).

General measures: the Government was invited to publish the European Court’s judgment and disseminate it to all authorities directly concerned. The confirmation of publication and dissemination is awaited. The United Kingdom authorities informed the Committee of Ministers that the legislation in question (Child Care Act 1980) has been replaced by the Children Act 1989, which came into force on 14/10/1991. As regards specifically the violation of Article 13, the Government was invited to clarify whether the Human Rights Act (HRA) provided a legal basis for damages claims, given that the domestic legal system did not establish liability of local authorities for damages in similar cases. The Government is of the opinion that this question is dealt with in Section 8 (4) of the HRA, which states that, in determining whether to make an award and if so the amount of it, domestic courts must take into account the principles applied by the European Court under Article 41 of the Convention. According to the Government this provision meets the above-mentioned concern.

H46-1070     28945          T.P. and K.M., judgment of 10/05/01 - Grand Chamber

The case concerns a breach of the applicants’ right to respect for family life, in that the first applicant was deprived of adequate involvement in the decision-making process concerning the care of her daughter (the second applicant), as a result of the local authority’s failure to submit a video document to the competent national court in order to determine whether to disclose it to the first applicant. This interference was considered by the Court as “not necessary in a democratic society” (violation of Article 8). It also concerns the fact that the applicants did not have available to them an appropriate means for obtaining a determination of their allegations that the local authority breached their right to respect for family life and the possibility of obtaining an enforceable award of compensation for the consequent damage (violation of Article 13).

General measures: At the 760th meeting (June 2001), the Government was invited to publish the European Court’s judgment and disseminate it to local authorities and the courts competent to examine cases of this kind. The confirmation of the publication and dissemination is awaited.

At the same meeting, the Government indicated that the Human Rights Act (HRA) could provide a sufficient remedy to the violations found (for details see CM/Del/OJ/OT(2001)775, section 4.2). As regards specifically the violation of Article 13, the Government was invited to clarify whether the HRA provided a legal basis for damages claims, given that the domestic legal system did not establish liability of the local authorities for damages in similar cases. The Government is of the opinion that this question is dealt with in Section 8 (4) of the HRA, which states that, in determining whether to make an award and if so the amount of it, the domestic courts must take into account the principles applied by the European Court of Human Rights under Article 41 of the Convention. According to the Government this provision meets the above-mentioned concern.

SUB-SECTION 5.4 – OTHER MEASURES

No new case

SECTION 6 - CASES WAITING FOR THE PRESENTATION OF A DRAFT RESOLUTION

Action

At the time of issuing the present annotated Agenda and Order of Business, the Secretariat was preparing, in consultation with the Permanent Representations concerned, draft resolutions aiming at closing the examination of these cases. The Deputies are invited to postpone consideration of these cases to their next meeting.

Section 6

- 19 cases against Austria

H46-971       37075          Luksch, judgment of 13/12/01, final on 13/03/02

H46-972       35019          Ludescher, judgment of 20/12/01, final on 20/03/02

H46-2817     33382          Fischer Joseph, judgment of 17/01/02, final on 17/04/02

H46-2818     33501          Telfner, judgment of 20/03/01, final on 20/06/01

H46-2819     29477          Eisenstecken, judgment of 03/10/00

H46-2820     30428          Beer Gertrude, judgment of 06/02/01

H46-2821     27783          T., judgment of 14/11/00

H46-2822     25878          Michael Edward Cooke, judgment of 08/02/00

H54-2823     15153          Vereinigung Demokratischer Soldaten Österreichs and Berthold Gubi,

                                      judgment of 19/12/94

H32-2824     26113          Wirtschafts-Trend Zeitschriften Verlagsgesellchaft m.b.H.

H46-2825     28501          Pobornikoff, judgment of 03/10/00

H46-2826     35115          Riepan, judgment of 14/11/00, final on 14/02/01

H46-2827     37950          Franz Fischer, judgment of 29/05/01, final on 29/08/01

H46-2828     26958          Jerusalem, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H32-2829     17291          Hortolomei

H46-2830     32097          Biegler Bau GesmbH, judgment of 11/07/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-2831     31266          G.H., judgment of 03/10/00, final on 03/01/01

H46-2832     26297          G.S., judgment of 21/12/99

H46-2833     33915          Walder, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 17/09/01

- 2 cases against Bulgaria

H32-2834     30381          Mironov - Interim Resolution DH(99)352

H46-2835     32438          Stefanov, judgment of 03/05/01, final on 03/08/01 - Friendly settlement

- 1 case against Cyprus

H46-2784     29515          Larkos, judgment of 18/02/99

- 1 case against Croatia

H46-3836     53227          Majstorović, judgment of 06/06/2002 - Friendly settlement

- 3 cases against the Czeck Republic

H46-2838     33644          Cesky, judgment of 06/06/00, final on 06/09/00

H46-2839     31315          Punzelt, judgment of 25/04/00, final on 25/07/00

H46-2840     35848          Barfuss, judgment of 31/07/00, final on 31/10/00

- 1 case against Denmark

H46-2841     48470          Jensen, judgment of 14/02/02 – Friendly settlement

- 1 case against Finland

H46-2842     25651          L., judgment of 27/04/00, final on 27/07/00

- 57 cases against France

H46-948       34791          Khalfaoui, judgment of 14/12/99, final on 14/03/00

H46-950       35589          Kanoun, judgment of 03/10/00, final on 03/01/01

H46-983       41943          L.L., judgment of 07/02/02, final on 07/05/02

Section 6

H46-988       53118          Boiseau, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02

H46-991       46708          Zaheg, judgment of 9/02/02, final on 19/05/02

H46-2843     31070          Van Pelt, judgment of 23/05/00, final on 23/08/00

H54-2844     21802          Muller, judgment of 17/03/97

H32-2845     24263          Areno

H46-2846     37786          Debboub Husseini Ali, judgment of 09/11/99, final on 09/02/00

H32-2847     23438          Elbialy

H32-2848     22578          G.N. II

H46-2849     39779+        Gombert and Gochgarian, judgment of 13/02/201, final on 13/05/01

H54-2850     28213          I.A., judgment of 23/09/98

H32-2851     18847          J-P.DV

H32-2852     15091          L.D.

H32-2853     21911          Lanza

H32-2854     17831          Morganti

H46-2855     38781          P.B., judgment of 01/08/00, final on 01/11/00

H46-2856     34947          Richet, judgment of 13/02/01, final on 13/05/01

H32-2857     24245          Touihri

H46-2858     46693          Chapus, judgment of 24/10/00, final on 24/01/01

H46-2859     38398          Leclercq, judgment of 28/11/00, final on 28/02/01

H46-2860     47194          Leboeuf, judgment of 26/03/02 – Friendly settlement

H46-2861     44791          Marcel, judgment of 09/04/02 – Friendly settlement

H32-2862     27518          A.S.

H32-2863     35259          Nagler

H32-2864     31603          Hermant

H46-2865     38687          Djaid, judgment of 29/09/99, final on 29/12/99

H32-2867     31842          Darmagnac Pierre V

H46-2868     40493          Jacquie and Ledun, judgment of 28/03/00, final on 28/06/00

H46-2869     43288          Mahieu, judgment of 19/06/01

H32-2870     25309          Maljean

H54-2871     36313          Henra, judgment of 29/04/98

H54-2872     36317          Leterme, judgment of 29/04/98

H54-2873     32217          Pailot, judgment of 22/04/98

H54-2874     33441          Richard, judgment of 22/04/98

H46-2875     25803          Selmouni, judgment of 28/07/99 - Grand Chamber

H46-2876     33933          Guisset, judgment of 26/09/00, final on 26/09/00

H32-2877     26496          Société Fruehauf la France

H46-2878     31819+        Annoni Di Gussola, Desbordes and Omer, judgment of 14/11/00, final on 14/02/01

H46-2879     34553          Dulaurans, judgment of 21/03/00

H32-2880     27659          Ferville

H32-2881     28845          Venot

H32-2882     33656          Lemoine Daniel

H32-2883     17572          A.C.

H54-2884     25201          Guerin, judgment of 29/07/98

H54-2885     24767          Omar, judgment of 29/07/98

H54-2886     14032          Poitrimol, judgment of 23/11/93

H46-2887     25444          Pelissier and Sassi, judgment of 25/03/99

H32-2888     27413          Cazes

H46-2889     34406          Mazurek, judgment of 01/02/00, final on 01/05/00

H46-2890     25088          Chassagnou and others, judgment of 29/04/99

H54-2891     25017          Mehemi, judgment of 06/09/97

H32-2892     27019          Slimane-Kaïd I

H54-2893     23618          Lambert Michel, judgment of 24/08/98

H46-2894     37257          Lucas, judgment of 28/11/00, final on 28/02/01

H46-2895     44617          Leray and others, judgment of 20/12/01, final on 20/03/02

Section 6

- 3 cases against Germany

H46-2896     23541          Garcia Alva, judgment of 13/02/01

H46-2897     24479          Lietzow, judgment of 13/02/01

H46-2898     25116          Schöps, judgment of 13/02/01

- 40 cases against Greece

H46-959       42079          E.H., judgment of 25/10/01, final on 27/03/02

H32-955       32397          Sinnesael, Interim Resolution DH(99)130

H54-953       21522          Georgiadis Anastasios, judgment of 29/05/97

H46-956       53478          Sajtos, judgment of 21/03/2002, final on 21/06/2002

H32-954       34373          Goutsos, Interim Resolution DH(99)558

H46-2899     47734          Adamogiannis, judgment of 14/03/2002, final on 14/06/2002

H46-2900     38178          Serif, judgment of 14/12/99, final on 14/03/00

H54-2901     18748          Manoussakis and others, judgment of 25/09/96

H46-2902     40434          Kosmopolis S. A., judgment of 29/03/01, final on 29/06/01

H46-2904     39442          Société Anonyme Sotiris and Nikos Koutras Attee, judgment of 16/11/00, final on

                                     16/02/01

H46-2905     30342          Academy Trading Ltd and others, judgment of 04/04/00

H54-2906     28523          Portington, judgment of 23/09/98

H46-2907     38971          Protopapa and Marangou, judgment of 28/03/00, final on 28/06/00

H46-2908     40437          Tsingour, judgment of 06/07/00, final on 06/10/00

H46-2909     41459          Fatourou, judgment of 03/08/00, final on 03/11/00

H54-2910     20323          Pafitis and others, judgment of 26/02/98

H46-2911     38459          Varipati, judgment of 26/10/99, final on 26/01/00

H32-2912     34569          Société anonyme Dimitrios Koutsoumbos, société technique,

                                      commerciale and touristique

H32-2913     32857          Stamoulakatos Nicholas I

H46-2914     37439          Agga, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00

H54-2915     19773          Philis 2, judgment of 27/06/97

H54-2916     18357          Hornsby, judgment of 19/03/97

H46-2917     37098          Antonakopoulos, Vortsela and Antonakopoulou, judgment of 14/12/99, final on

                                      21/03/00

H46-2918     31107          Iatridis, judgments of 25/03/99 and 19/10/00 (Article 41) – Grand Chamber

H46-2919     41209          Georgiadis Dimitrios, judgment of 28/03/00, final on 28/06/00

H32-2920     30175          S.A. « Avis Entreprises Hôtelières Touristiques and Industrielles Rurales »

H46-2921     33170          Biba, judgment of 26/09/00, final on 26/12/00

H46-2922     28802          Tsavachidis, judgment of 21/01/99

H54-2923     19233+        Tsirlis and Kouloumpas, judgment of 29/05/97

H46-2924     43597          Dionyssios Petrotos, judgment of 29/02/00 –Friendly settlement

H46-2925     38194          Karakasis, judgment of 17/10/00, final on 17/01/01

H46-2926     34369          Thlimmenos, judgment of 06/04/00

H46-2927     38704          Savvidou, judgment of 01/08/00, final on 01/11/00

H46-2928     41867          Messochoritis, judgment of 12/04/01, final on 12/07/01

H32-2929     24453          Tarighi Wageh Dashti

H46-2930     46380          LSI Information Technologies, judgment of 20/12/01, final on 20/03/02

H46-2932     53051          Livanos, judgment of 16/05/02 - Friendly settlement

H46-2933     50529          Teka Ltd, judgment of 26/06/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-2934     49222          Tiburzi, judgment of 25/10/01 – Friendly settlement

H46-2935     38703          Agoudimos and Cefallonian Sky Shipping Co., judgment of 28/06/01,

                                      final on 28/09/01

- 2 cases against Hungary

H46-2936     32396          Magyar, judgment of 11/01/01, final on 11/04/01

H46-2937     38937          Erdős, judgment of 09/04/2002, final on 09/07/2002

Section 6

- 1 case against Ireland

H46-8           33267          Croke, judgment of 21/12/00, final on 21/03/01 - Friendly settlement

- 121 cases against Italy

H46-2938     38415          C.M.F., judgment of 18/07/2002 - Friendly settlement

H32-2939     27253          Biasetti

H46-2940     44955          Mancini Vittorio and Luigi, judgment of 02/08/01, final on 12/12/01

H32-2941     25650          Santandrea

H46-2942     29569          Buscemi, judgment of 16/09/99

H46-2943     37019          A.M., judgment of 14/12/99, final on 14/03/00

H46-2944     31227          Ambruosi, judgment of 19/10/00, final on 19/01/01

H54-2945     14025          Zubani, judgments of 07/08/96 and 16/06/99

H32-2946     16609          Intrieri

H46-2947     44968          Amato Del Re, judgment of 07/05/02, Friendly settlement

H46-2948     35797          Arrivabene, judgment of 07/05/02, Friendly settlement

H46-2949     35795          Ferrari Barbara, judgment of 07/05/02, Friendly settlement

H46-2950     42609          Fusco Fabrizio, judgment of 07/05/02, Friendly settlement

H46-2951     42444          O.L.B., judgment of 13/06/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-2952     40037          S.B., judgment of 13/06/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-2953     40537          T., judgment of 13/06/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-2954     44864          V.L. and others, judgment of 07/05/02, Friendly settlement

H46-2955     30968          Barone Mario, judgment of 04/10/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-2956     32645          Castello, judgment of 04/10/01- Friendly settlement

H46-2957     32404          Girolami Zurla, judgment of 04/10/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-2958     31916          Immobiliare Anba, judgment of 04/10/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-2959     31922          Micucci, judgment of 04/10/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-2960     33831          Musiani Dagnini, judgment of 04/10/01- Friendly settlement

H46-2961     31929          Pini and Bini, judgment of 04/10/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-2962     31927          Serlenga, judgment of 04/10/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-2963     32650          Sit s.r.l., judgment of 04/10/01- Friendly settlement

H46-2964     32648          Tentori Montalto, judgment of 04/10/01- Friendly settlement

H46-2965     32671          B. and F., judgment of 21/02/02 – Friendly settlement

H46-2966     33966          Bastreghi, judgment of 03/12/01 – Friendly settlement

H46-2967     32363          Bertini, judgment of 03/12/01 – Friendly settlement

H46-2968     37242          Caramanti, judgment of 03/12/01 – Friendly settlement

H46-2969     32541          Celona, judgment of 21/02/02 – Friendly settlement

H46-2970     31605          Colucci, judgment of 21/02/02 – Friendly settlement

H46-2971     33967          De Filippis, judgment of 21/02/02 – Friendly settlement

H46-2972     31480          Guglielmi II, judgment of 21/02/02 – Friendly settlement

H46-2973     37509          Pané, judgment of 21/02/02 – Friendly settlement

H46-2974     31525          Pezza, judgment of 21/02/02 – Friendly settlement

H46-2975     37007          Pittini, judgment of 18/07/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-2976     31259          Rizzi, judgment of 03/12/01 – Friendly settlement

H46-2977     39716          Stoppini, judgment of 21/02/02 – Friendly settlement

H46-2978     38656          Tiberio, judgment of 21/02/02 – Friendly settlement

H46-2979     36010          Venturi, judgment of 18/07/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-2980     41221          Troiani Marcello, judgment of 06/12/2001, final on 10/07/2002

H46-2981     40979          Conte Riccardo II, judgment of 05/04/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-2982     40954          D’Alessandro, judgment of 05/04/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-2983     44814+        M.A. and 81 others, judgment of 30/11/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-2984     40978          Mantini, judgment of 05/04/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-2985     40956          Marchetti, judgment of 05/04/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-2986     44344          Marcotrigiano, judgment of 19/12/00

H46-2987     41812          Piccirillo Aldo, judgment of 09/01/01 - Friendly settlement

Section 6

H46-2988     43077          A.S. II, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-2989     43092          Ascierto Pietro, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-2990     43048          Bernardo, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-2991     43005          Bianchi Michele, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-2992     38973          Borrillo, judgment of 22/06/00 – Friendly settlement

H46-2993     40975          Bucci, judgment of 05/04/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-2994     43082          C.S., judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-2995     43081          C.T., judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-2996     43073          Camerlengo, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-2997     43007          Capasso, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-2999     43008          Catillo, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-3000     43107          Circelli Maria Carmela, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-3001     42989          Costantini, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-3002     40960          Dattilo, judgment of 05/04/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-3003     43014          D’Errico, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-3004     43044          De Cicco Giuseppe, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-3005     43003          De Fiore, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-3006     43013          De Nunzio, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-3007     42992          Del Grosso, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-3008     43047          Del Vecchio Edvige, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-3009     43009          Di Biase Maria, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-3010     42991          Falzarano, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-3011     43045          Forgione, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-3012     43049          Fusco Adelia, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-3013     43104          Galietti, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-3014     43002          Giorgio Nicola, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-3015     43103          Lombardi Gianfranco and 7 others, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-3016     43105          Intorcia, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-3017     43006          La Vista, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-3018     43080          M.A.P., judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-3019     42990          Manganiello, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-3020     40722          Marotta, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-3021     42988          Marucci, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-3022     42994          Mascolo, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-3023     43046          Masella, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-3024     43001          Masuccio, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-3025     42995          Mirra, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-3026     43071          Narciso, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-3027     43079          P.C. IV, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-3028     43089          Pellegrino Rossi, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-3029     43090          Perugini, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-3030     43106          Rossi Lina, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-3031     43108          Selvaggio, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-3032     43004          Verzino, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-3033     43078          Z., judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-3034     54288          Andreozzi, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-3035     54297          Aniceto, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-3036     54291          Caproni, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-3037     54309          Carretta, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-3038     54313          Castiello, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-3039     54292          Cerasomma, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-3040     54290+        D'Agostino Francesco, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-3041     44401          Fermi and others, judgment of 06/11/01 – Friendly settlement

H46-3042     54294          Fiore Mario, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-3043     54280          Giordano, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-3044     54302          Incollingo, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

Section 6

H46-3045     54301          Jaculli, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-3046     54296          Manera, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-3047     54306          Masia, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-3048     54308          Mignanelli, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-3049     54279          Prete, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-3050     54314          Quacquarelli, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-3051     54284          Radicchi, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-3052     54298          Sabetta, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-3053     54311          Soave, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-3054     54303          Spatrisano, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-3055     54305          Tamburrini, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-3056     54285          Tatangelo, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-3057     54315          Tortolani, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-3058     54295          Trovato, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-3059     54317          Zullo Rocco, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

- 1 case against Latvia

H46-3060     50108          Kulakova, judgment of 18/10/01 – Friendly settlement

- 4 cases against Lithuania

H46-3061     37975          Graužinis, judgment of 10/10/00, final on 10/01/01

H46-3062     36743          Grauslys, judgment of 10/10/00, final on 10/01/01

H46-3063     34578          Jėčius, judgment of 31/07/00

H46-3064     47679          Stašaitis, judgment of 21/03/2002, final on 21/06/2002

- 3 cases against Luxembourg

H46-3065     21156          G.J., judgment of 26/10/00

H46-3066     41761          Scheele, judgment of 17/05/01, final on 17/08/01

H46-3067     45165          Matthies-Lenzen, judgment of 05/02/02 – Friendly settlement

- 7 cases against the Netherlands

H32-3068     14084          R.V. and others - Interim Resolution DH(2000)25

H46-3069     28369          Camp and Bourimi, judgment of 03/10/00

H46-3070     29192          Ciliz, judgment of 11/07/00

H46-3071     31725          Köksal, judgment of 20/03/01 – Friendly settlement

H46-3072     58964          K.K.C., judgment of 21/12/01 – Friendly settlement

H46-3073     33258          Holder, judgment of 05/06/01 – Friendly settlement

H46-3074     36499          Samy, judgment of 18/06/2002 - Friendly settlement

- 6 cases against Poland

H46-2813     28358          Baranowski, judgment of 28/03/00

H46-3075     31382          Kurzac, judgment of 22/02/01, final on 22/05/01

H46-3076     38670          Dewicka, judgment of 04/04/00, final on 04/07/00

H46-3077     51669          Pałys, judgment of 11/12/01 – Friendly settlement

H46-3078     31387          Kliniecki, judgment of 21/12/00, final on 21/03/01 – Friendly settlement

H46-3079     25874          Kawka, judgment of 09/01/01

Section 6

- 5 cases against Portugal

H54-1037     15777          Matos and Silva and 2 others, judgment of 16/09/96

H46-3080     33290          Salgueiro Da Silva Mouta, judgment of 21/12/99, final on 21/03/00

H46-3081     37528          Martins and Garcia Alves, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01

H46-3082     42636          Bento Da Mota, judgment of 28/06/01, final on 28/09/01

H46-3083     37698          Lopes Gomes da Silva, judgment of 28/09/00, final on 28/12/00

- 1 case against Romania

H32-3084     32922          C.C.M.C.

- 7 cases against the Slovak Republic

H46-3085     34753          Jóri, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01

H46-3086     40345          Stančiak, judgment of 12/04/01, final on 12/07/01

H46-3087     29032          Feldek, judgment of 12/07/01, final on 12/10/01

H46-3088     32686          Marônek, judgment of 19/04/01, final on 19/07/01

H46-3089     46843          Remšíková, judgment of 17/05/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-3090     24530          Vodeničarov, judgment of 21/12/00

H46-3091     38794          J.K., judgment of 23/07/2002 - Friendly settlement

- 2 cases against Slovenia

H46-3092     29462          Rehbock, judgment of 28/11/00

H46-3093     28400          Majarič, judgment of 08/02/00

- 3 cases against Sweden

H46-3094     26978          Beck, judgment of 09/01/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-3095     28222          Muonio Saami Village, judgment of 09/01/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-3096     32531          Jakola, judgment of 06/03/01 – Friendly settlement

- 12 cases against Switzerland

H46-3097     27154          D.N., judgment of 29/03/01 - Grand Chamber

H46-3098     33958          Wettstein, judgment of 21/12/00, final on 21/03/01

H46-3099     27798          Amann, judgment of 16/02/00 - Grand Chamber

H54-3100     23224          Kopp, judgment of 25/03/98

H32-3101     26452          D’Amico Heidi and Salvatore

H46-3102     54273          Boultif, judgment of 02/08/01, final on 02/11/01

H46-3103     24699          VGT Verein Gegen Tierfabriken, judgment of 28/06/01, final on 28/09/01

H46-3104     37292          F.R., judgment of 28/06/01, final on 28/09/01

H46-3105     33499          Ziegler, judgment of 21/02/02, final on 21/05/02

H46-3106     27426          G.B., judgment of 30/11/00, final on 01/03/01

H46-3107     28256          M.B., judgment of 30/11/00, final on 01/03/01

H32-3108     27613          P.B.

- 58 cases against Turkey

H46-2815     29495          Erdemli, judgment of 30/10/01, final on 30/10/01

H46-3109     29295+        Ecer and Zeyrek, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H46-3110     31850          Günay and others, judgment of 27/09/01, final on 27/12/01

H46-3111     34686          Sürek Kamil Tekin, judgment of 14/06/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-3112     29851          Zana, judgment of 06/03/01, final on 06/06/01

H46-3113     32983          Çavuşoğlu, judgment of 06/03/01 - Friendly settlement

Section 6

H46-3114     24947          Ekinci Lalihan, judgment of 05/06/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-3115     31849          İşçi, judgment of 25/09/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-3116     24669          Karataş and Boğa, judgment of 17/10/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-3117     24937          Koç Fırat, judgment of 05/06/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-3118     24933          Kürküt, judgment of 10/07/01 – Friendly settlement

H46-3119     31733          Tuncay and Ozlem Kaya, judgment of 08/11/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-3120     28011          Yeşiltepe, judgment of 10/07/01 – Friendly settlement

H46-3121     35980          Z.E., judgment of 07/06/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-3122     29862          Bağci and Murğ, judgment of 10/07/01 – Friendly settlement

H46-3123     31882          Çakmak, judgment of 10/07/01 – Friendly settlement

H46-3124     32450          Çaloğlu, judgment of 10/07/01 – Friendly settlement

H46-3125     31896          Değerli, judgment of 22/05/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-3126     29866+        Demir C., Demir M. and Gül, judgment of 10/07/01 – Friendly settlement

H46-3127     29883+        Fidan, Çağro and Özarslaner, judgment of 10/07/01 – Friendly settlement

H46-3128     31787          Göktaş and others, judgment of 25/09/01

H46-3129     31249          Gündüz and others, judgment of 14/11/01 – Friendly settlement

H46-3130     24932          Kaplan, judgment of 26/02/02 – Friendly settlement

H46-3131     28013+        Karatepi and Kirt, judgment of 17/07/01 – Friendly settlement

H46-3132     34499          Kortak, judgment of 31/05/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-3133     31895          Morsümbül, judgment of 25/09/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-3134     30495          Mutlu and Yildiz, judgment of 10/07/01 – Friendly settlement

H46-3135     28014+        Okuyucu, Kara and Bilmen, judgment of 17/07/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-3136     30453          Özata and others, judgment of 22/05/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-3137     29425          Özçelik and others, judgment of 10/07/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-3138     36760          Şanlı and Erol, judgment of 22/05/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-3139     37191          Yildirim and others, judgment of 25/09/01

H46-3140     34684          Yolcu, judgment of 05/02/02 – Friendly settlement

H46-3141     19264          Aktaş and others, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01

H32-3142     22907          Atatür A. and M., and Pamir

H46-3143     19266          Baltekin, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01

H46-3144     19267          Bilgin Mehmet and others, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01

H46-3145     19268          Bilgin Saniye and others, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01

H46-3146     19269          Bozkurt and others, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01

H46-3147     19272          Çalkan and others, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01

H46-3148     19273          Çapar, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01

H46-3149     19274          Çelebi Hamdi, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01

H46-3150     19275          Çelebi Yusuf, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01

H46-3151     19276          Çiplak and others, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01

H46-3152     19277          Daniş, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01

H46-3153     19278          Erol, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01

H46-3154     19280          Gökgöz, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01

H46-3155     19281          Gökmen and others, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01

H46-3156     38931          İ.S., judgment of 28/03/02 – Friendly settlement

H46-3157     19270          Ilhan Buzcu and others, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01

H46-3158     19283          Işik Ayşe and others, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01

H46-3159     19284          Işik Yilmaz and others, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01

H46-3160     19286          Karabulut Sefer, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01

H46-3161     19271          Nuriye Buzcu, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01

H46-3162     19287          Özen, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01

H46-3163     19288          Öztekin, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01

H46-3165     31312          Eğinlioğlu, judgment of 20/12/01 – Friendly settlement

H46-3168     29921          Büker, judgment of 24/10/00, final on 24/01/01

Section 6

- 16 cases against the United Kingdom

H46-3169     24724          T., judgment of 16/12/99 - Grand Chamber

H46-3170     24888          V., judgment of 16/12/99 - Grand Chamber

H46-3171     29545          Devlin, judgment of 30/10/01, final on 30/01/02

H46-3172     45276          Hilal, judgment of 06/03/01, final on 06/06/01

H54-3173     24839          Bowman, judgment of 19/02/98

H46-3174     35685          Mills, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01

H32-3175     27237          Govell

H32-3176     26109          Santa Cruz Ruiz

H54-3177     24838          Steel, Lush, Needham, Polden and Cole, judgment of 23/09/98

H46-3178     35394          Khan, judgment of 12/05/00, final on 05/10/00

H46-3179     28901          Rowe and Davis, judgment of 16/02/00

H46-3180     35718          Condron, judgment of 02/05/00, final on 02/08/00

H46-3181     33274          Foxley, judgment of 20/06/00, final on 20/09/00

H46-3182     39360          S.B.C., judgment of 19/06/01, final on 19/09/01

H54-3183     20605          Halford, judgment of 25/06/97 - Interim Resolution DH(1999)725

H46-3184     36670          Duyonov and others, judgment of 02/10/01 – Friendly settlement

c. PREPARATION OF THE NEXT DH MEETING
(827th MEETING, 11-12 February 2003)

(See Addendum Preparation of the next meeting)

Action

The Deputies are invited to approve the preliminary lists of items to be examined at the next DH meeting, which appears in Addendum Preparation of the next meeting to the present annotated agenda and order of business.

819th meeting (DH) – 3 and 5 December 2002

APPENDIX 2

819th MEETING (DH) 3and 5 December 2002

827th meeting DH (11-12 February 2003)
Preliminary list of items for consideration

————————————————


The draft annotated Agenda and Order of Business will be issued on 30 January 2003
The classification of the cases in sections is at this stage purely on an indicative basis.

Document made public in pursuance of the decision taken at the 749^th meeting

(DH) (17 April 2001) – item d.

CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION. 120

GENERAL QUESTIONS. 126

SECTION 1 - FINAL RESOLUTIONS. 127

SECTION 2 - NEW CASES. 132

SECTION 3 - JUST SATISFACTION. 135

SECTION 4 - CASES RAISING SPECIFIC QUESTION (INDIVIDUAL MEASURES,
MEASURES NOT YET DEFINED OR SPECIAL PROBLEMS) 160

SECTION 5 - SUPERVISION OF GENERAL MEASURES ALREADY ANNOUNCED.. 199

SECTION 6 - CASES AWAITING FOR THE PRESENTATION OF A DRAFT RESOLUTION. 204

c. PREPARATION OF THE NEXT DH MEETING (834th MEETING, 8-9 April 2003) 214

Additional documents

Addendum General Questions

Addendum 1 - Final Resolutions

Addendum 4 – Cases raising special questions

Addendum Preparation of the next DH meeting (834 meeting, 8-9 April 2003)

INTRODUCTION

At the present Human Rights meeting, the Committee of Ministers, sitting at the level of the Ministers’ Deputies, will supervise the execution of some .. cases in accordance with Article 46, § 2, of the Convention for the protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Supervision is carried out in accordance with the Rules for the application of this Article adopted by the Deputies on 11 January 2001[97]. The Directorate General of Human Rights (Department for the execution of the judgments of the Court) and the Secretariat of the Committee of Ministers provide advice and assistance to the Deputies in the fulfilment of their functions under the Convention. Information and communications relating to the cases should be addressed to these departments.

Below follows a short comparative survey of the meeting (the information on the nature of the cases in the different sections is described after the table):

SECTION 1 – FINAL RESOLUTIONS

In the cases appearing under this heading the Deputies are invited to adopt draft resolutions putting an end to the supervision of execution carried out pursuant to Article 46§2 of the Convention (or former Articles 32[98] and 54 for cases decided before the entry into force of Protocol N° 11).

In these cases the Court (or the Committee) has either found a violation of the Convention or struck the case out of the list on the basis of undertakings made by the parties (for example in the case of friendly settlements – see Article 39 of the Convention and Rule 44 of the Rules of Court).

In all the cases, the Deputies have provisionally found, with the assistance of the Directorate General of Human Rights, that the required execution measures have been taken. The relevant information for each case has been summarised in a draft final resolution presented in Addendum 1. To facilitate examination, the cases are grouped as follows:

Sub-section 1.1. - Leading cases

In these leading cases the measures adopted aim at preventing new violations of the Convention  (legislative or regulatory measures, changes of case-law, mere publication in those states where the Convention and the Court’s judgments are given direct effect, administrative measures or other measures) and/or at redressing adequately the individual situation of the applicant (among the measures which may be relevant mention may be made of reopening of proceedings, striking out a conviction from criminal records, granting a residence permit, etc.)

Sub-section 1.2 – Cases concerning problems already solved

 This sub-section comprises cases which do not raise problems as regards the applicant’s individual situation, but which concern general problems which have already been solved in the context of similar earlier cases.

Sub-section 1.3 – Cases not involving general or individual measures

Contains cases which do not raise problems of a general or individual character. In these cases the mere dissemination of the judgment to the authorities directly concerned is considered sufficient.

Sub-section 1.4 – Friendly settlements and problems of a general character

This new sub-section groups friendly settlements relating to complaints concerning general problems already under examination by the Deputies in the context of other leading cases in which violations have been established.

No discussion of cases in Section 1 is envisaged since the examination of the different execution questions has already been carried out by the Deputies in the course of earlier meetings.

SECTION 2 – NEW CASES

Under this heading, the Deputies are called upon to conduct a first examination of the execution of the new final judgments delivered by the Court (Article 44 §§ 1 and 2 of the Convention) finding violations of the Convention. The Deputies also supervise the execution of judgments striking cases out of the Court’s list (friendly settlements, non-pursuit of the application, or a solution to the dispute) and which contain specific undertakings (Article 39 of the Convention and Article 44 of the Rules of Court).

The examination of new cases is in general resumed after the expiry of the 3-month time-limit normally imparted by the Court for the payment of the just satisfaction.

 

In those cases where all execution measures have already been taken before this first examination, a draft final resolution summarising the relevant information could be submitted for adoption. Such draft resolutions appear in Addendum 2.

Discussion is envisaged mainly for cases which raise questions of individual measures or new general measures.

Dissemination of the judgments to all the authorities involved has been requested in all these cases.

SECTION 3 – JUST SATISFACTION

In these cases the Deputies are called upon to supervise the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court and, where required, of any default interest owed.

 

The section also presents the last cases in which the Deputies, in accordance with former Article 32§2 of the Convention, are called upon to decide on the question of just satisfaction on the basis of proposals submitted by the former European Commission of Human Rights or by the Committee of Special Advisors set up by Resolutions DH(99)681 and (2000)138 (see also decision 692/4.4 from December 1999).

                   Sub-section 3.1 – control of payment:

3.1.a: Supervision of the payment of the capital sum of the just satisfaction as well as, where due, of default interest, in cases where the deadline for payment expired less than 6 months ago.

No discussion is envisaged of cases appearing in sub-section 3.1.a. Delegations are invited to submit written confirmation of payment to the Directorate General of Human Rights (Service for the execution of the judgments).

 

3.1.b: Supervision of the payment of the capital sum of the just satisfaction in cases where the deadline for payment expired more than 6 months ago.

3.1.c: Examination of special payment problems (for example the disappearance of the applicant, disputes regarding the exact amount paid as a result of exchange rate problems or administrative fees).

The further examination of the cases in sub-sections 3.1 a - c depends on the information received.

Sub-section 3.2 – Decisions on just satisfaction

The Deputies may be are called upon to take a decision on just satisfaction pursuant to former Article 32. The details of the cases are found either in a table presented under this sub-section, or, if the case is complex, in Addendum 3 II.

The examination of such cases will be resumed after the expiry of the 3 months time-limit set for payment.

SECTION 4 – CASES RAISING SPECIAL QUESTIONS

(individual measures, measures not yet defined or special problems) 

The cases which appear under this heading require special attention to the extent that they either raise problems regarding the individual situation of the applicant, or concern problems in respect of which the necessary execution measures have not yet been defined, or raise other special problems (for example on account of the magnitude of the problems raised or delays in the adoption of the necessary execution measures).

 

Sub-section 4.1 – Supervision of individual measures only

This sub-section groups together cases in which the Deputies will exclusively examine the measures taken or to be taken in order to put an end to the violation found and/or remedy its consequences as far as the applicant’s individual situation is concerned – where the just satisfaction awarded by the Court has not done so.

Sub-section 4.2 - Individual measures and/or general problems

This heading presents both cases involving payment problems combined with general problems and cases in which measures have not yet been defined. For supervision of individual measures, see sub-section 4.1 above; for supervision of payment, subsection 3.1.c and for general measures, section 5 below.

 

Sub-section 4.3 – Special problems

This title groups together complex cases raising special problems.

Supplementary information relating to the cases under this heading may, where necessary, be found in Addendum 4.

As long as individual measures are outstanding cases are examined at each Human Rights meeting, unless the Deputies decide otherwise. Examination of other issues is decided upon on a case-by-case basis.

SECTION 5 – SUPERVISION OF GENERAL MEASURES ALREADY ANNOUNCED

In these cases the Deputies are called upon to supervise the progress made in adopting measures of a general character defined at the national level and to ensure that these measures are apt to prevent new violations similar to those found by the Court. Cases are grouped together according to the nature of the main reforms envisaged.

In complex cases which require the adoption of several kinds of measures, cases are placed in the sub-section which corresponds to the main measures remaining to be adopted. A case may thus, for example, pass from sub-section 5.1 to sub-section 5.4 if the legislative changes required are rapidly adopted, whereas the implementation of the practical measures required turn out to take more time.

Sub-section 5.1 – Legislative and/or regulatory changes

In the cases in this group, the Deputies are mainly waiting for changes of legislation or of government regulations aiming at preventing new similar violations. Delegations of respondent States will thus furnish information about the content of draft legislation or regulations and on the procedure for their adoption.

Sub-section 5.2 – Changes of courts’ case-law or of administrative practice

This heading presents cases in which the Deputies are waiting for evidence (in the form of copies of judgments or decisions, statistics, etc.) of a change of the domestic courts’ case-law or of administrative practice, where such a change cannot, for one reason or another, be presumed solely on the basis of the publication or dissemination of the judgment (cf. the next sub-section).

 

Sub-section 5.3 – Publication / dissemination

This title encompasses in particular cases in which a change of court case-law or of administrative practice may be presumed, on the basis of evidence of the direct effect accorded to the Court’s judgments in general, as a result of simply publishing or disseminating the judgment in the case at issue, where necessary in translation into the national language. It may also concern other types of cases presenting a broader interest, such as those which imply important indications regarding the scope of the rights guaranteed by the Convention. In all these cases, the Deputies are normally waiting for details regarding the publication or dissemination carried out.

No discussion is envisaged under sub-section 5.3 and the Deputies are invited to present all relevant information in writing to the Directorate General of Human Rights (Service for the execution of the judgments of the Court).

Sub-section 5.4 – Other measures

This sub-section includes cases which primarily imply other types of general measures, for example practical measures such as the construction of prison facilities, the recruitment of judges, police training, etc.

Where necessary, supplementary information with respect to the cases in this section will be presented in Addendum 5.

Examination of these cases is normally resumed within 6 months’ time.

SECTION 6 – CASES WAITING FOR THE PRESENTATION OF A DRAFT RESOLUTION 

In these cases, the draft resolutions (prepared in collaboration with the Delegation concerned in cases raising questions of individual measures or new problems of a general character) putting and end to the examination of the case are not yet available at the time of issuing the annotated agenda and order of business.

If available in time for the meeting, drafts could be distributed separately.

No discussion of these cases is envisaged: examination is in principle be resumed at the next Human Rights meeting.

GENERAL QUESTIONS

a.                Adoption of the Annotated Agenda and Order of Business

Action

The Deputies are invited to adopt the present annotated agenda and order of business.

b.                State of ratification by member States of the European Agreement relating to persons participating in proceedings of the European Court of Human Rights, the Sixth Protocol to the General Agreement on privileges and immunities of the Council of Europe and Protocols No. 12 and No. 13 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms

Action

The Deputies are invited to provide information on the state of signature and ratification of these four texts. Tables showing the current state of signature and ratification appear in Addendum General Questions.

c.                Preparation of the next meeting (834th (8-9 April 2003)) see page 214

d.                Application of default interest in the supervision of the execution of the terms of friendly settlements

                   Addendum General Questions

Action

The Deputies are invited to resume consideration of this item, in the light of the comments they were invited to transmit to the Secretariat (see Addendum General Questions).

SECTION 1 - FINAL RESOLUTIONS

(NO DEBATE ENVISAGED)

(Addendum 1)

Action

The Deputies are invited to adopt the resolutions putting and end to the examination of the following cases as they appear in Addendum 1.

                   SUB-SECTION 1.1 – LEADING CASES

- 4 cases against Greece

H46-            38703          Agoudimos and Cefallonian Sky Shipping Co., judgment of 28/06/01,

                                      final on 28/09/01

H46-            33170          Biba, judgment of 26/09/00, final on 26/12/00

H46-            38194          Karakasis, judgment of 17/10/00, final on 17/01/01

H32-            30175          S.A. « Avis Entreprises Hôtelières Touristiques and Industrielles Rurales »

                   SUB-SECTION 1.2 – CASES CONCERNING PROBLEMS ALREADY SOLVED

                   No new case

                   SUB-SECTION 1.3 – CASES NOT INVOLVING GENERAL OR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES

- 1 case against Greece

H46-            39442          Société Anonyme Sotiris and Nikos Koutras Attee, judgment of 16/11/00,

                                      final on 16/02/01

- 1 case against Italy

H46-            29569          Buscemi, judgment of 16/09/99

                   SUB-SECTION 1.4 – FRIENDLY SETTLEMENTS AND PROBLEMS OF A GENERAL CHARACTER

- 1 case against Austria

H46-            32097          Biegler Bau GesmbH, judgment of 11/07/2002 - Friendly settlement

- 1 case against Croatia

H46-            53227          Majstorović, judgment of 06/06/2002 - Friendly settlement

- 3 cases against Greece

H46-            53051          Livanos, judgment of 16/05/02 - Friendly settlement

H46-            50529          Teka Ltd, judgment of 26/06/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-            49222          Tiburzi, judgment of 25/10/01 – Friendly settlement

- 33 cases against Italy

H46-            33966          Bastreghi, judgment of 03/12/01 – Friendly settlement

H46-            32363          Bertini, judgment of 03/12/01 – Friendly settlement

H46-            37242          Caramanti, judgment of 03/12/01 – Friendly settlement

H46-            31259          Rizzi, judgment of 03/12/01 – Friendly settlement

H46-            44968          Amato Del Re, judgment of 07/05/02, Friendly settlement

H46-            35797          Arrivabene, judgment of 07/05/02, Friendly settlement

H46-            35795          Ferrari Barbara, judgment of 07/05/02, Friendly settlement

H46-            42609          Fusco Fabrizio, judgment of 07/05/02, Friendly settlement

H46-            42444          O.L.B., judgment of 13/06/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-            40037          S.B., judgment of 13/06/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-            40537          T., judgment of 13/06/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-            44864          V.L. and others, judgment of 07/05/02, Friendly settlement

H46-            32671          B. and F., judgment of 21/02/02 – Friendly settlement

H46-            32541          Celona, judgment of 21/02/02 – Friendly settlement

H46-            31605          Colucci, judgment of 21/02/02 – Friendly settlement

H46-            33967          De Filippis, judgment of 21/02/02 – Friendly settlement

H46-            31480          Guglielmi II, judgment of 21/02/02 – Friendly settlement

H46-            37509          Pané, judgment of 21/02/02 – Friendly settlement

H46-            31525          Pezza, judgment of 21/02/02 – Friendly settlement

H46-            39716          Stoppini, judgment of 21/02/02 – Friendly settlement

H46-            38656          Tiberio, judgment of 21/02/02 – Friendly settlement

H46-            30968          Barone Mario, judgment of 04/10/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-            32645          Castello, judgment of 04/10/01- Friendly settlement

H46-            32404          Girolami Zurla, judgment of 04/10/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-            31916          Immobiliare Anba, judgment of 04/10/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-            31922          Micucci, judgment of 04/10/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-            33831          Musiani Dagnini, judgment of 04/10/01- Friendly settlement

H46-            31929          Pini and Bini, judgment of 04/10/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-            31927          Serlenga, judgment of 04/10/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-            32650          Sit s.r.l., judgment of 04/10/01- Friendly settlement

H46-            32648          Tentori Montalto, judgment of 04/10/01- Friendly settlement

H46-            37007          Pittini, judgment of 18/07/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-            36010          Venturi, judgment of 18/07/2002 - Friendly settlement

- 1 case against Poland

H46-            31387          Kliniecki, judgment of 21/12/00, final on 21/03/01 – Friendly settlement

SECTION 2 - NEW CASES

Action

The Deputies are invited to procede to the first examination, under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the ECHR, of the following new judgments, delivered by the European Court of Human Rights (for further information, see the text of the judgments, http://www.echr.coe.int) on the assumption that judgments which are not yet final will not be referred to the Grand Chamber.

The Deputies are invited to resume consideration of these cases after expiry of the time-limit set for payment or according to the specificity of the cases.

PAYMENT OF JUST SATISFACTION

In all the new cases in which States should pay just satisfaction as ordered by the Court or as agreed in a friendly settlement, the authorities of the respondent State are invited to provide the Secretariat, in writing, with confirmations of payment.

INDIVIDUAL AND/OR GENERAL MEASURES

As regards any other execution measures which may be called for in the light of the conclusions of the Court, the authorities of the respondent State are invited, on a preliminary basis, to provide the Secretariat, in writing, with information on the measures mentioned after each case. The possible necessity to take other measures than those mentioned could nevertheless be addressed at the meeting.

Dissemination of the judgments to all the authorities involved is requested in all cases and delegations are invited to provide the written confirmation of this dissemination.

In all these cases, just satisfaction or compensation agreed under a friendly settlement has been awarded to the applicants except in the following cases: ...

The Secretariat has indicated the cases for which, in principle, no debate seems to be necessary, by the mention “No debate envisaged”.

The cases for which the final character of the judgment has not yet been confirmed by the Court appear in grey background.

Section 2

- 1 case against Austria

H46-            33505          H.E., judgment of 11/07/2002, final on 06/11/2002[99]

- 1 case against Belgium

H46-            37370          Stratégies and Communications and Dumoulin, judgment of 15/07/2002,

                                      final on 15/10/2002

- 1 case against Chypre

H46-            51591          Markass Car Hide Ltd, judgment of 02/07/2002, final on 06/11/2002[100]

- 2 cases against Croatia

H46-            62912          Benzan, judgment of 08/11/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-            56773          Rajčević, judgment of 23/07/2002, final on 06/11/2002[101]

- 4 cases against France

H46-            38748          Immeubles Groupe Kosser, judgment of 21/03/2002, final on 21/06/2002

H46-            54210          Papon, judgment of 25/07/2002, final on 25/10/2002

H46-            42400          Seguin, judgment of 16/04/2002, final on 06/11/2002[102]

H46-            41358          Desmots, judgment of 02/07/2002, final on 06/11/2002[103]

- 1 case against Greece

H46-            50824          Azas, judgment of 19/09/2002, final on 19/12/2002

- 9 cases against Italy

H46-            57574+        Sulejmanovic and others and Sejdovic and Sulejmanovic,

                                      judgment of 08/11/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-            36534          Osu, judgment of 11/07/2002, final on 11/10/2002

                   - Cases concerning the failure to enforce judicial eviction orders against tenants

H46-            36112          C. Srl, judgment of 07/11/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-            38043          Ciccone, judgment of 07/11/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-            33115          Fabbrini, judgment of 15/11/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-            35001          Franceschetti, judgment of 07/11/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-            36734          Visca, judgment of 07/11/2002 - Friendly settlement

                   - Cases of length of criminal proceedings

H46-            42210          Corsi Andrea, judgment of 04/07/2002, final on 04/10/2002

H46-            40231          Spinello Salvatore, judgment of 04/07/2002, final on 04/10/2002

Section 2

- 2 cases against Poland

H46-            71891          Hałka and others, judgment of 02/07/2002, final on 02/10/2002

H46-            55106          Górka, judgment of 05/11/2002 - Friendly settlement

- 1 case against Portugal

H46-            48187          Rosa Marques and others, judgment of 25/07/2002, final on 25/10/2002

- 1 case against Romania

H46-            33358          Oprea and others, judgment of 16/07/2002, final on 16/10/2002

- 2 cases against the Slovak Republic

H46-            41263          Konček, judgment of 26/11/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-            41384          Varga, judgment of 26/11/2002 - Friendly settlement

- 1 case against Spain

H46-            45238          Perote Pellon, judgment of 25/07/2002, final on 25/10/2002

- 15 cases against Turkey

H46-            36971          Kuray, judgment of 26/11/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-            38588          Keçeci, judgment of 26/11/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-            25144+        Sadak Selim and others, judgment of 11/06/2002, final on 06/11/2002[104]

H46-            27209+        Kiliç Özcan, judgment of 26/11/2002 - Friendly settlement

                   - Cases concerning action of the security forces

H46-            27602          Ekinci Ülkü, judgment of 16/07/2002, final on 16/10/2002

H46-            25656          Örhan Salih, judgment of 18/06/2002, final on 06/11/2002[105]

H46-            31890          Kıney M. and Kıney R., judgment of 26/11/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-            36189          Yakar, judgment of 26/11/2002 - Friendly settlement

                   - Cases relating to the administration’s delay in payment of additional compensation for expropriation and the applicable rate of default interest

H46-            19660          Çalkan Dudu, judgment of 28/03/2002, final on 28/06/2002

H46-            20140          Çelebi Mehmet, judgment of 28/03/2002, final on 28/06/2002

H46-            68117          Denli Nesibe, judgment of 23/07/2002, final on 23/10/2002

H46-            20144          Kartal Adile, judgment of 28/03/2002, final on 28/06/2002

H46-            20152          Özen Mehmet, judgment of 28/03/2002, final on 28/06/2002

H46-            20151          Öztürk Ahmet, judgment of 28/03/2002, final on 28/06/2002

H46-            20155          Şen Aziz n° 2, judgment of 28/03/2002, final on 28/06/2002

- 1 case against Ukraine

H46-            48553          Sovtransavto Holding, judgment of 25/07/2002, final on 06/11/2002[106]

- 1 case against the United Kingdom

H46-            36042          Willis, judgment of 11/06/2002, final on 11/09/2002

SECTION 3 - JUST SATISFACTION

Action

The Deputies are invited to supervise the payment of just satisfaction in the following cases pending before the Committee of Ministers for execution supervision. The Deputies are invited to resume consideration of these cases in principle at their next Human Rights meeting.

3.a               SUPERVISION OF THE PAYMENT OF THE CAPITAL SUM OF THE JUST SATISFACTION AS WELL AS, WHERE DUE, OF DEFAULT INTEREST, IN CASES WHERE THE DEADLINE FOR PAYMENT EXPIRED LESS THAN 6 MONTHS AGO

At the time of issuing the present Annotated Agenda and Order of Business, the Secretariat had not received the written confirmation of payment of just satisfaction and/or default interest in the following cases (see the table below summarising the total number of cases by States). The Representatives of the States concerned are invited to give the Secretariat written confirmation of payment of the sums awarded by the Court and/or the default interests (no debate envisaged during the meeting).

- 3 cases against Austria

                   - Just satisfaction to be paid

H46-            38275          W.F., judgment of 30/05/2002, final on 30/08/2002

H46-            29271          Dichand and others, judgment of 26/02/02, final on 26/05/02

                   - Default interest to be paid

H46-            36075          Siegl, judgment of 20/06/2002 - Friendly settlement

- 1 case against Belgium

                   - Default interest to be paid

H46-            51564          Čonka, judgment of 05/02/02, final on 05/05/02

- 2 cases against Bulgaria

H46-            38361          Anguelova, judgment of 13/06/2002, final on 13/09/2002

H46-            50963          Al-Nashif and others, judgment of 20/06/2002, final on 20/09/2002[107]

- 1 case against Cyprus

H46-            53594          Alithia Publishing Company, judgment of 11/07/2002, final on 11/10/2002

- 1 case against Finland

H46-            30013          Türkiye iş Bankasi, judgment of 18/06/2002, final on 18/09/2002

- 34 cases against France

                   - Just satisfaction to be paid

H46-            51279          Colombani and others, judgment of 25/06/2002, final on 25/09/2002

H46-            48161          Motais de Narbonne, judgment of 02/07/2002, final on 02/10/2002

H46-            53613          Goth, judgment of 16/05/2002, final on 16/08/2002

H46-            32911+        Meftah, Adoud and Bosoni, judgment of 26/07/2002 - Grand Chamber

H46-            37971          Sociétés Colas Est, judgment of 16/04/2002, final on 16/07/2002

H46-            41376          D.M., judgment of 27/06/2002, final on 27/09/2002

H46-            43125          Delbec Annick n° 3, judgment of 18/06/2002, final on 18/09/2002[108]

H46-            33395          L.R., judgment of 27/06/2002, final on 27/09/2002

H46-            39626          Granata, judgment of 19/03/02, final on 19/06/02

Section 3.a

H46-            38396          Karatas and Sari, judgment of 16/05/2002, final on 16/08/2002

H46-            33424          Nouhaud and others, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002

H46-            44952+        Van der Kar and Lissaur Van West, judgment of 19/03/02, final on 19/06/02

H46-            47007          Arnal, judgment of 19/03/02, final on 19/06/02

H46-            51575          Baillard, judgment of 26/03/2002, final on 04/09/2002[109]

H46-            48215          Lutz, judgment of 26/03/2002, final on 26/06/2002

H46-            44081          Perhirin and 29 others, judgment of 14/05/2002, final on 04/09/2002[110]

H46-            56198          Société Industrielle d’Entretien and de Service (Sies), judgment of 19/03/02,

                                      final on 19/06/02

H46-            51179          Solana, judgment of 19/03/02, final on 04/09/2002[111]

H46-            44797+        Etcheveste and Bidart, judgment of 21/03/2002, final on 21/06/2002

H46-            45172          Fentati, judgment of 22/10/2002 - Friendly settlement

                   - Default interest to be paid

H46-            33592          Baumann, judgment of 22/05/01, final on 22/08/01

H46-            41476          Laine, judgment of 17/01/02, final on 17/04/02

H46-            40096          Versini, judgment of 10/07/01, final on 10/10/01

H46-            41526          Pulvirenti, judgment of 28/11/00, final on 28/11/00

H46-            44211          Lacombe, judgment of 07/11/00, final on 07/02/01

H46-            39273          Vermeersch, judgment of 22/05/01, final on 22/08/01

H46-            48167          Hababou, judgment of 26/04/01- Friendly settlement

H32-            39966          De Cantelar

H46-            42195          Mortier, judgment of 31/07/01, final on 31/10/01

H46-            39594          Kress, judgment of 07/06/01, final on 07/06/01

H46-            40472          Tricard, judgment of 10/07/01, final on 10/10/01

H46-            29731          Krombach, judgment of 13/02/01, final on 13/05/01

H46-            47631          Lemort, judgment of 26/04/01, final on 26/04/01

H32-            31677          Watson John

- 9 cases against Greece

                   - Just satisfaction to be paid

H46-            37095          Pialopoulos and others, judgments of 15/02/01, final on 27/06/02 and of 15/05/01,

                                      final on 06/11/02[112] (Article 41)[113]

                   - Default interest to be paid

H46-            48392          Hatzitakis, judgment of 11/04/2002, final on 11/07/2002

H46-            48679          AEPI S.A., judgment of 11/04/2002, final on 11/07/2002

H46-            46356          Smokovitis and others, judgment of 11/04/2002, final on 11/07/2002

H46-            49215          Angelopoulos, judgment of 11/04/2002, final on 11/07/2002

H46-            46806          Sakellaropoulos Yeoryios, judgment of 11/04/2002, final on 11/07/2002

H46-            46352          Logothetis, judgment of 12/04/01, final on 12/07/01 and judgment of 18/04/02

                                      (Article 41), final on 18/07/02

H46-            49282          Marinakos, judgment of 04/10/01 – Friendly settlement

H46-            47020          Kolokitha, judgment of 07/06/01 - Friendly settlement

Section 3.a

- 2 cases against Hungary

H46-            42373          Bódine Bencze, judgment of 01/10/2002 – Striking-out following a friendly

                                      settlement

H46-            43352          Kósa, judgment of 01/10/2002 – Striking-out following a friendly settlement

- 485 cases against Italy

                   - Just satisfaction to be paid

H46-            36732          Pisano, judgment of 24/10/2002 - Striking-out - Grand Chamber

H46-            33202          Beyeler, judgments of 05/01/00 (merits) and of 28/05/02 (just satisfaction)

H46-            28724          Capitanio, judgment of 11/07/2002, final on 11/10/2002[114]

H46-            46079          Biffoni, judgment of 24/10/2001 - Friendly settlement

H46-            41624          Calvagno, judgment of 03/10/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-            31928          F. and F., judgment of 24/10/2001 - Friendly settlement

H46-            39690          Gianotti Ricardo, judgment of 03/10/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-            35243          N. and D.A., judgment of 18/07/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43986          Pugliese Rosalba, judgment of 03/10/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-            47895          Sartorelli, judgment of 24/10/2001 - Friendly settlement

H46-            34714          Tacchino and Scorza, judgment of 18/07/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-            37248          Vietti, judgment of 18/07/2002 - Friendly settlement

- Civil courts[115]

H46-            56084          At.M., judgment of 07/05/02, final on 07/08/02

H46-            41740          Diebold, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-            44413          Guerrera Angelo Giuseppe, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            44396          Ital Union Servizi S.a.s. n° 1, judgment of 12/02/2002, final on 04/09/2002[116]

H46-            44913          Ital Union Servizi S.a.s. n° 2, judgment of 12/02/2002, final on 04/09/2002[117]

H46-            44914          Ital Union Servizi S.a.s. n° 3, judgment of 12/02/2002, final on 04/09/2002[118]

H46-            56087          L.B., judgment of 12/02/2002, final on 04/09/2002[119]

H46-            47479          Mastromauro S.R.L., judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-            44409          Rizzo Giuseppe, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02, rectified on 09/07/02

H46-            51664          Rodolfi, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02

H32-            30423          Salini Costruttori Spa, Interim Resolution DH(99)673

H46-            51674          V.I., judgment of 11/12/2001, final on 04/09/2002[120]

- Administrative courts[121]

H46-            56226          Abate and Ferdinandi, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02

H46-            44341          Cannone, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002

H46-            44347          Carapella and others, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002

H46-            44350          Cecere Domenico, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002

H46-            56222          Centis, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02

H46-            56206          Colonnello and others, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02

Section 3.a

H46-            56208          Conte and others, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02

H46-            56202          Cornia, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02

H46-            56224          D’Amore, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02

H46-            56217          De Cesaris, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02

H46-            44337          Delli Paoli, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002

H46-            56205          Dente, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02

H46-            56225          Di Pede II, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02

H46-            56221          Donato, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02

H46-            56212          Folletti, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02

H46-            44349          Fragnito, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002

H46-            44340          Gaudenzi, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002

H46-            56203          Ginocchio, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02

H46-            44334          Lattanzi and Cascia, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-            56204          Limatola, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02

H46-            56207          Lugnan in Basile, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02

H46-            56220          Mastropasqua, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02

H46-            38594          Mereu and S. Maria Navarrese, judgment of 13/06/2002, final on 13/09/2002

H46-            56211          Napolitano Giuseppe, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02

H46-            44348          Nazzaro and others, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002

H46-            44351          Pace and others, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002

H46-            56213          Piacenti, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02

H46-            56223          Polcari, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02

H46-            56219          Presel, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02

H46-            56214          Ripoli I, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02

H46-            56215          Ripoli II, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02

H46-            56201          Sardo Salvatore, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02

H46-            56218          Stabile Michele, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02

- Court of Audit

H46-            54282          Amici, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-            54278          Leonardi, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-            54312          Manna, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-            54319          Sportola, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

- Labour courts[122]

H46-            51031          Aceto and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51089          Armellino Francesco, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51093          Armellino Lucia, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            52824          Belviso and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            52804          Bianco Pellegrino, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            52816          Biondi and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51030          Biondo, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51150          Calabrese, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51134          Cardo Cristina, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51146          Cardo Elisa, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            52835          Cerbo and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            52801          Ciarmoli, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            52815          Cimmino and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51112          Circelli Maria Antonia, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            52807          Ciullo, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

Section 3.a

H46-            52821          Colangelo Domenico, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51116          Colella, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51147          Crisci, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51164          Crovella, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51149          Cuozzo Giovanna, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51154          Cuozzo Francesco, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51163          D’Angelo Michele, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51125          De Filippo, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51098          De la Rosa Giovanna, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51141          De Rosa Maria, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51137          Del Grosso Nicola, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51160          Del Re, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51027          Del Vecchio Anna Rita, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51155          Della Ratta, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51129          Di Dio, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51131          Di Maria, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            52813          Di Meo and Masotta, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            52846          Di Meo Antonio, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51099          Di Meo Franca, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51092          Di Mezza, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51157          Di Resta, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51143          Donato Pepe, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51119          Esposito Lucia, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51145          Falluto, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51121          Falzarano Pasquale, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51156          Fasulo, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02, rectified on 12/09/2002

H46-            51091          Ferrara Clementina, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/2002

H46-            51128          Ferrara Serafina, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51144          Fiorenza Carmine, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51142          Formato, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            52843          Franco and Basile, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51161          Gagliardi, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51103          Gattone and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51135          Gaudino Palma, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            47186          Gentile Agostino, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            52830          Giannotta and Iannella, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51148          Gisondi, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51159          Grasso Alfonsina, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51094          Iacobucci and Lavorgna, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51153          Iannotta Antonietta, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51102          Iesce and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51120          Izzo Antonio, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51170          Izzo Giovanni, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51021          La Torella, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            52802          Lagozzino, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            52812          Lavorgna and Iorio, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51140          Lombardi Emma, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51100          Lombardi Gaetana, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            52822          Macolino, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            52819          Mancino, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51169          Marotta Alberto, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51138          Marotta Arturo, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51168          Martino Alfonso, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            52827          Mastrocinque Mafalda, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51167          Matera Tommasina, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

Section 3.a

H46-            51101          Maturo and Vegliante, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            52845          Mazzarelli, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51130          Mazzone and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51158          Meccariello, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51118          Melillo, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            52818          Meola, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51133          Moffa, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            52840          Mongillo Mario, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            44428          Nardone Antonio, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-            51136          Nazzaro, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            52832          Nero and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51029          Ocone, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51105          Pacifico, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51114          Paduano, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            52829          Pallotta, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51023          Palmieri Maddalena, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51022          Palmieri Mario Francesco, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            52841          Panza, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            52837          Pascale and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            52842          Pascale Elda, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            52826          Pascale Maria Annunziata, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51111          Patuto Salvatore, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51113          Pelosi Concetta, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51162          Pengue, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            52808          Perna Giuseppina, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            52828          Petrillo and Petrucci, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51025          Petrillo Gino, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51139          Pilla Addolorata, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51024          Porto, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            52825          Pucella and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51126          Raccio Emilia, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51109          Restuccio, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51095          Riccardi Lucia, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            52820          Riccardi Vicenzina, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51096          Riccio and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51108          Rinaldi, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            52823          Romano and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            52844          Romano Rosa, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51151          Ruggiero, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            52833          Santagata, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51165          Santina Pelosi, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51090          Scaccianemici, judgment of 28/02/02, final on28/05/02

H46-            40151          Sciarrotta, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-            52831          Simone and Pontillo, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51115          Spagnoletti, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            52839          Tanzillo, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            52836          Tazza and Zullo, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            52810          Tazza, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51152          Tretola, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            52809          Truocchio Edmondo, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51166          Truocchio Mario, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51124          Tudisco, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51097          Uccellini and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            52817          Urbano and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

Section 3.a

H46-            51026          Uzzo, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            52811          Villari, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            52847          Viscuso, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51028          Vitelli, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            51132          Zeolla, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            52814          Zoccolillo and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H46-            52800          Zuotto, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

- Criminal proceedings[123]

H46-            38576          Barattelli Carlo, judgment of 04/07/2002, final on 04/10/2002

H46-            41863          Boldrin Stefano, judgment of 04/07/2002, final on 04/10/2002

H46-            37249          Casadei Roberto, judgment of 04/07/2002, final on 04/10/2002

H46-            35991          Del Federico Alberto, judgment of 04/07/2002, final on 04/10/2002

H46-            42619          Di Vuono Bernardo, judgment of 04/07/2002, final on 04/10/2002

H46-            44173          Mucciacciaro Raffaele, judgment of 04/07/2002, final on 04/10/2002

H46-            42287          Pascazi Domenico, judgment of 04/07/2002, final on 04/10/2002

H46-            43915          Rocci Luigi, judgment of 04/07/2002, final on 04/10/2002

H46-            42291+        Tumbarello and Titone, judgment of 04/07/2002, final on 04/10/2002

H46-            41424          Nuvoli, judgment of 16/05/2002, final on 16/08/2002

- Criminal proceedings combined with civil action for damages[124]

H46-            46970          Contardi, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

                   - Default interest to be paid

H46-            39676          Rojas Morales, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01

H46-            26772          Labita, judgment of 06/04/00, final on 06/04/00

H46-            30882          Pellegrini Maria Grazia, judgment of 20/07/01, final on 20/10/01

H46-            15918          Antonetto, judgment of 20/07/00, final on 20/10/00

H46-            28168          Quadrelli, judgment of 11/01/00, final on 20/03/00

H46-            33354          Lucà, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H46-            26161          Natoli, judgment of 09/01/01

H32-            19734          F.S. I, Interim Resolution DH(98)209

H46-            28272          Ghidotti, judgment of 21/02/02, final on 21/05/02

H46-            41852          Vaccaro, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01

H46-            39221+        Scozzari and others, judgment of 13/07/00 – Grand Chamber

                                      Interim Resolutions ResDH(2001)65 and ResDH(2001)151[125]

- Civil courts[126]

H46-            44481          A.C. VII, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-            46515          Adriani, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H46-            46964          Alpites S.P.A., judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-            47785          Angemi, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-            48412          Ar.M., judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02

H46-            46958          Ardemagni and Ripa, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H32-            39900          Artuso Paolo

H32-            39137          Avallone

H46-            44511          Bellagamba, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-            40977          Beltramo, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01

Section 3.a

H46-            44431          Beluzzi and others, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H46-            39883          Bertozzi, judgment of 27/04/00, final on 27/04/00

H46-            44442          Bevilacqua, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H46-            36811          Bielectric S.R.L., judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01

H46-            44437          Bocca, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H32-            39121          Bolla

H46-            44457          Bonelli, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-            44436          Buffalo s.r.l., judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H46-            46534          Burghesu, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01

H46-            46980          C.L., judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H32-            35292          Calandrella F., P. and 2 others

H46-            39881          Capodanno, judgment of 05/04/00, final on 05/04/00

H46-            45071          Capurro and Tosetti, judgment of 28/04/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            46526          Carboni, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01

H46-            45859          Caruso Giuseppina, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01

H46-            45861          Cavallaro, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01

H46-            36620          Ceriello, judgment of 26/10/99, final on 26/10/99

H46-            46537          Cerulli and Zadra, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01

H46-            45869          Chiappetta, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01

H46-            46959          Circo and others, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-            44504          Citterio and Angiolillo, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-            47779          Ciuffetti, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-            46532          Conte Gaspare and others, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01

H46-            47774          Conti Giuliana, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H46-            44385          Cornaglia, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H46-            46527          Corsi, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01

H46-            35616          Coscia, judgment of 11/04/00, final on 11/04/00

H46-            46538          Costantini Francesco, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01

H46-            44500          Cova, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-            45880          Cultraro, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H46-            46536          D.C. IV, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01

H46-            45872          D’Annibale, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01

H32-            17482          D'Aquino and Petrizzi, Interim Resolution DH(96)28

H46-            40216          D’Arrigo and Garrozzo, judgment of 21/11/00, final on 21/02/01

H32-            40566          De Cicco Concetta

H32-            40580          De Lorenzi

H46-            42520          De Simone Pasquale, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H32-            39138          Di Fant I

H32-            39139          Di Fant II

H46-            46976          Di Motoli and others, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-            46520          Dorigo Franco, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01

H46-            44480          E.G., judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H32-            39906          Emmebiemme S.r.l.

H46-            40982          Erdokovy, judgment of 01/02/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            46524+        F., T. and E., judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01

H46-            46533          F.L.S., judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01

H46-            39164          F.S.p.A. II, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01

H46-            46971          F.T., judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H32-            26012          Facciolini

H46-            46968          Falconi, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-            47781          Farinosi and Barattelli, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-            45870          Ferrazzo and others, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01

H46-            45868          Filippello Giorgio II, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01

Section 3.a

H32-            38145          Focardi and Conti

H46-            46965          Franceschetti and Odorico, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H32-            38118          Fraschetti

H46-            44397          G.B. IV, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H46-            37131          G.M.N., judgment of 02/11/99, final on 02/11/99

H32-            38503          G.P. and 25 others

H46-            46543          G.S. and L.M., judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01

H46-            47786          G.V. V, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-            46963          Galiè, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-            46528          Giannalia, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01

H46-            47773          Gianni, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H46-            45860          Giuseppe Nicola and Luciano Caruso, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01

H46-            40968          I.F., judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01

H46-            44418          I.P.E.A. S.R.L., judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H46-            39116          I.R., judgment of 15/02/00, final on 15/02/00

H46-            44447          Ianniti and others, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H46-            46516          Il Messaggero S.a.s. II, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01

H46-            46517          Il Messaggero S.a.s. III, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01

H46-            46518          Il Messaggero S.a.s. IV, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01

H46-            46519          Il Messaggero S.a.s. V, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01

H46-            47777          Ilardi, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H46-            44508          Immobiliare Il Messaggero del geometra Antonio Iorillo, judgment of 25/10/01,

                                      final on 25/01/02

H46-            39894          Italiano, judgment of 15/02/00, final on 15/02/00

H46-            46530          Iulio, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01

H46-            40924          L. S.r.l., judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00

H46-            46542          Lanino, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01

H32-            31341          Lazzari and Scagnoli

H46-            45853          Lo Cicero, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01

H32-            40571          Lo Sardo

H46-            46523          Lonardi, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01

H46-            46962          Lucas International S.R.L., judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-            44406          M. S.r.l., judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H46-            46961          Maletti, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H32-            28725          Manzi A., B. and L.

H46-            44443          Marchi, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H46-            46957          Marcolongo, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-            44517          Mari and Mangini, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-            44422          Marzinotto, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H46-            46966          Massaro, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-            46979          Mastrantonio Francesca, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-            44420          Mauri, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H46-            46973          Morelli and Nerattini, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-            44490          Murgia, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H32-            39872          Nata

H46-            46522          Nolla, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01

H46-            44494          O.P., judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-            44468          P.B. V, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-            40570          Padalino V. and G., judgment of 15/02/00, final on 15/02/00

H46-            40952          Paderni II, judgment of 05/04/00 - Friendly settlement

H32-            21707          Panissa, D., G. and A. Vittonetto

H32-            39155          Perilli and Gigotti Micheli

H46-            45070          Persichetti and C.S.r.l., judgment of 27/07/00 - Friendly settlement

Section 3.a

H46-            44380          Pettirossi, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H46-            28936          Piccinini II, judgment of 11/04/00 - Friendly settlement

H32-            39899          Pirilli

H32-            45065          Pirola, judgment of 27/07/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            46967          Procaccianti, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-            46969          Procopio, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-            44412          Quattrone Pasquale, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H46-            38498          Rando, judgment of 15/02/00, final on 15/02/00

H46-            45058          Rettura, judgment of 17/10/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            44465          Rigutto, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-            43098          Romano, judgment of 28/09/00 - Friendly settlement

H32-            35328          Roselli Italo II

H46-            44479          Rosetti e Ciucci and C., judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H46-            44527          Rossana Ferrari, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-            44472          Rossi Valeria, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-            44461          Sacchi Roberto, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-            38135          Sanna, judgment of 11/04/00, final on 11/04/00

H46-            44466          Santoro Valerio, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-            47780          Santorum, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-            45854          Savino, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 04/04/01

H46-            44419          Sbrojavacca Pietrobon, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H46-            36621          Scalvini, judgment of 26/10/99, final on 26/10/99

H46-            44491          Sonego, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-            44470          Spada, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-            39705          Spurio II, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01

H32-            39865          Staffolani

H46-            44417          Tagliabue, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H32-            38102          Talenti

H46-            44486          Tebaldi, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-            44425          Tedesco Michele, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H46-            46539          Tor Di Valle Costruzioni S.P.A. VII, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01

H46-            45068          Toscano and others, judgment of 27/07/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            44488          Vecchi and others, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-            44528          Vecchini, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-            44534          Venturini Alberto I, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H32-            40586          Verini II

H46-            40599          Vicari II, judgment of 15/02/00

H46-            44395          Visentin, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H46-            37166          Vitale and others, judgment of 02/11/99

H46-            44445          W.I.E. S.n.c., judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H46-            44462          Zanasi, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-            37079          Zironi, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01

- Administrative courts[127]

H46-615       41809          A.B. V, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00

H46-616       34437          Caliendo, judgment of 14/03/00, final on 14/03/00

H46-617       41817          Caliri, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00

H46-618       41807          Centioni and others, judgment of 09/01/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-619       41815          Monti Enrico, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00

H46-620       41810          Mosca, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00

H46-621       41813          Musiani, judgment of 09/01/01 - Friendly settlement

Section 3.a

H46-            41816          Paradiso Antonio, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00

H46-            31631          Procaccini, judgment of 30/03/00, final on 30/03/00

H46-            41814          Zeoli and 34 others, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 05/10/00

- Cour of Audit

H46-            41829          Campomizzi, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00

H46-            41833          Cardillo, judgment of 28/04/00, final on 28/07/00

H46-            41821          Delicata, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00

H46-            41823          Pascali and Conte, judgment of 05/04/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            41831          Pio, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00

H46-            41819          Quinci, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00

H46-            41830          Raglione, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00

H32-            39175          Sileo, Interim Resolution DH(99)524

H46-            41820          Sinagoga, judgment of 28/04/00, final on 28/07/00

H46-            41837          Trotta, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00

H46-            41841          Vay, judgment of 28/04/00, final on 28/07/00

H46-            41818          Vero, judgment of 28/04/00, final on 28/07/00

- Labour courts[128]

H46-            40363          Ascierto Ada, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43063          Bello, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43094          C.B., judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            42999          Cacciacarro, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43020          Ciaramella Pasquale, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H32-            36615          Cappello, Interim Resolution DH(99)212

H32-            38095          Cardillo, Interim Resolution DH(99)317

H46-            46521          Ciccardi, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01

H46-            42996          Cocca, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            44532          Colacrai, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 12/12/01

H46-            43088          Coppolaro, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43086          Cosimo Cesare, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43087          Cosimo Rotondi, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43083          D’Addona Simone, judgment of 22/06/00 – Friendly settlement

H46-            43017          D’Ambrosio, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43059          D’Antonoli, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43054          Del Buono, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43051          Di Biase Leonardo, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43062          Di Blasio Concetta, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            46975          Di Gabriele, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-            43030          Di Libero, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43022          Di Mella, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            46978          F.P., judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-            43056          Fallarino, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43058          Foschini, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            45855          Fr.C., judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01

H46-            43096          G.A. IV, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43093          G.P. VI, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43075          Gallo Giuseppe, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            37170          Giampietro, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H46-            38975          Gioia Angelina, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43050          Gioia Filomena Giovanna, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43074          Grasso, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            42998          Iannotta, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

Section 3.a

H46-            39124          Guagenti, judgment of 15/02/00, final on 15/02/00

H46-            43072          Guarino, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43091          Iadarola, judgment of 27/07/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43101          Iannotti, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43021          Iapalucci, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43067          Izzo Italia, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43065          Lanni, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43102          Lepore T., Lepore M. and Iannotti T., judgment of 27/07/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43068          Luciano, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43095          M.C. X, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43010          Mannello, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H32-            37160          Marsicovetere, Interim Resolution DH(99)221

H46-            43000          Maselli, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43018          Meoli, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43069          Mercone, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43057          Mongillo, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43064          Nicolella, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43100          Orsini, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43076          P.T. II, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43012          Palumbo, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43052          Panzanella, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43061          Patuto, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43060          Pizzi, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43023          Pozella, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            46974          Risola, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-            43019          Rubortone, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43055          Sabatino, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43099          Santillo, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43085          Silvio Cesare, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            42997          Squillace, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43084          Tontoli, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            46960          Trimboli, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-            43016          Truocchio, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43070          Vignona, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43109          Zeoli Nicolina, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43015          Zollo Clavio, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43066          Zullo, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

- Criminal courts[129]

H46-            38878          Ciacci, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-            42351          Del Giudice, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 06/09/01

H46-            45267          F.R. and 3 others, judgment of 26/07/01, final on 26/10/01

H46-            41603          G.B.Z., L.Z. and S.Z., judgment of 14/12/99, final on 15/02/00

H46-            41094          Giannangeli, judgment of 05/07/01, final on 05/10/01

H46-            32646          Guerresi, judgment of 24/04/01, final on 24/04/01

H46-            41893          Martinez, judgment of 26/07/01, final on 26/10/01

H46-            44943          Orlandi, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-            29898          Patanè, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-            30132          Pepe Umberto, judgment of 27/04/00, final on 27/07/00

H32-            36733          Perilli, Interim Resolution DH(99)427

H32-            24170          Pesce Mario, Interim Resolution DH(97)468

Section 3.a

H32-            26806          U.O. I, Interim Resolution DH(98)52

H32-            26781          U.O. II, Interim Resolution DH(98)129

H32-            26782          U.O. III, Interim Resolution DH(98)130

H46-            37118          Sergi, judgment of 11/04/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43199          Visintin, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H46-            23969          Mattoccia, judgment of 25/07/00

- Criminal proceedings combined with civil action for damages[130]

H46-            45856          Bacigalupi, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01

H46-            45857          Comella and others, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01

H46-            45858          Tesconi, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01

- 1 case against the Netherlands

H46-            34462          Wessels-Bergervoet, judgment of 04/06/2002, final on 04/09/2002 and judgment

                                      of 12/11/2002 (Article 41) – Friendly settlement

- 6 cases against Poland

                   - Just satisfaction to be paid

H46-            34611          Dacewicz, judgment of 02/07/2002, final on 02/10/2002

H46-            33885          Kawka Eryk, judgment of 27/06/2002, final on 27/09/2002

H46-            24244          Migoń, judgment of 25/06/2002, final on 25/09/2002[131]

H46-            27715+        Berliński Roman and Sławomir, judgment of 20/06/2002, final on 20/09/2002

H46-            48684          Uthke, judgment of 18/06/02, défintif le 18/09/02[132]

                   - Default interest to be paid

H32-            24559          Gibas

- 20 cases against Portugal

                   - Just satisfaction to be paid

H46-            54073          Agostinho, judgment of 03/10/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-            48233          Almeida Do Couto, judgment of 30/05/02 - Friendly settlement

H46-            47460          Câmara Pestana, judgment of 16/05/2002, final on 16/08/2002

H46-            48752          Coelho, judgment of 30/05/02 - Friendly settlement

H46-            49020          F. Santos Lda., judgment of 16/05/02 - Friendly settlement

H46-            50843+        Longotrans - Transportes Internacionais Lda, judgment of 03/10/2002 – Friendly

                                      settlement

H46-            45725          Malveiro, judgment of 14/03/02, final on 12/06/02

H46-            47833          Marques Francisco, judgment of 06/06/2002, final on 06/09/2002

H46-            47584          Martos Mellado Ribeiro, judgment of 30/05/02 - Friendly settlement

H46-            53793          Morais Sarmento, judgment of 03/10/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-            52772          Pereira Palmeira and Sales Palmeira, judgment of 04/07/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-            54449          Saraiva e Lei, judgment of 03/10/2002 - Friendly settlement

Section 3.a

H46-            49118          SIB - Sociedade Imobiliária Da Benedita Lda, judgment of 16/05/02 – Friendly

                                      settlement

H46-            44298          Tourtier, judgment of 14/02/02, final on 14/05/02

H46-            46464          Vaz Da Silva Girão, judgment of 21/03/2002, final on 21/06/2002

                   - Default interest to be paid

H46-            46772          Baptista Do Rosàrio, judgment of 04/04/02 – Friendly settlement

H46-            45648          Caldeira and Gomes Faria, judgment of 14/02/02 – Friendly settlement

H46-            48960          Conceição Fernandes, judgment of 20/12/01 – Friendly settlement

H46-            46143          Sociedade Panificadora Bombarralense Lda., judgment of 14/02/02 – Friendly

                                      settlement

H46-            43654          Pires, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

- 10 cases against Romania

                   - Just satisfaction to be paid

H46-            35831          Bălănescu, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002

H46-            34992          Basacopol, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002

H46-            33912          Budescu and Petrescu, judgment of 02/07/2002, final on 02/10/2002,

                                      rectified on 09/07/2002

H46-            29053          Ciobanu, judgment of 16/07/2002, final on 16/10/2002

H46-            32925          Cretu, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002

H46-            32943          Falcoianu and others, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002

H46-            29968          Hodoş and others, judgment of 21/05/2002, final on 04/09/2002[133]

H46-            29407          Vasiliu, judgment of 21/05/2002, final on 04/09/2002[134]

H46-            32260          Surpaceanu Constantin andTraian-Victor, judgment of 21/05/2002,

                                      final on 21/08/2002

                   - Default interest to be paid

H46-            28342          Brumărescu, judgments of 28/10/99, 23/01/01 (Article 41) and 11/05/01

                                      (rectification) – Grand Chamber

- 1 case against the Russian Federation

H46-            47095          Kalashnikov, judgment of 15/07/2002, final on 15/10/2002

- 1 case against the Slovak Republic

H46-            32106          Komanický, judgment of 04/06/2002, final on 04/09/2002[135]

- 1 case against Slovenia

H46-758       42320          Belinger, judgment of 13/06/2002 - Friendly settlement

- 33 cases against Turkey

                   - Just satisfaction to be paid

H46-            29289          Aydın Mehmet, judgment of 16/07/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-            38578          Kaplan Süleyman, judgment of 10/10/2002 - Friendly settlement

Section 3.a

H46-            33234          N.Ö, judgment of 17/10/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-            29296          İğdeli, judgment of 20/06/2002, final on 20/09/2002

H46-            34481          Filiz and Kalkan, judgment of 20/06/2002, final on 20/09/2002

H46-            33179          Karataş Seher, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002[136]

H46-            29590          Yağmurdereli, judgment of 04/06/2002, final on 04/09/2002[137]

H46-            27694          A.S., judgment of 28/03/02 – Friendly settlement

H46-            38916          Atalağ, judgment of 27/06/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-            38915          Bayram Abdullah Naci, judgment of 27/06/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-            35867          Bayram and others, judgment of 27/06/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-            37087          Bekmezci and others, judgment of 27/06/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-            20132          Bilgin Burhan, judgment of 20/06/2002, final on 20/09/2002

H46-            20133          Bilgin Leyli, judgment of 20/06/2002, final on 20/09/2002

H46-            20134          Bilgin Münir, judgment of 20/06/2002, final on 20/09/2002

H46-            37414          Birsel and others, judgment of 27/06/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-            20136          Canlı, judgment of 20/06/2002, final on 20/09/2002

H46-            20142          Günal Kazım, judgment of 20/06/2002, final on 20/09/2002

H46-            35050          Karabıyık and others, judgment of 27/06/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-            30448          Önel Ahmet, judgment of 23/05/2002, final on 23/08/2002

H46-            30948          Önel Mehmet, judgment of 23/05/2002, final on 23/08/2002

H46-            30446          Önel Temur, judgment of 23/05/2002, final on 23/08/2002

H46-            33419          Özdiler Hasan Doğan, judgment of 27/06/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-            30447          Özel Hacı Bayram, judgment of 23/05/2002, final on 23/08/2002

H46-            31964          Özel Hacı Osman, judgment of 23/05/2002, final on 23/08/2002

H46-            35079          Özkan and others, judgment of 27/06/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-            20153          Şen Ismet, judgment of 20/06/2002, final on 20/09/2002

H46-            20156          Şen Kemal, judgment of 20/06/2002, final on 20/09/2002

H46-            20154          Şen Mahmut, judgment of 20/06/2002, final on 20/09/2002

H46-            20158          Taşdemir Mehmet n° 2, judgment of 20/06/2002, final on 20/09/2002

H46-            35866          Ünlü Dudu, judgment of 27/06/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-            30944          Öcal, judgment of 10/10/2002 - Friendly settlement

                   - Default interest to be paid

H46-            22876          Şemse Önen, judgment of 26/01/02, final on 14/05/02

- 11 cases against the United Kingdom

H46-            43290          McShane, judgment of 28/05/2002, final on 28/08/2002[138]

H46-            30668+        Wilson and the National Union of journalists; Palmer, Wyeth and the National

                                      Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers; Doolan and others, judgment of

                                      02/07/2002, final on 02/10/2002[139]

H46-            56547          P., C. and S., judgment of 16/07/2002, final on 16/10/2002[140]

H46-            37471          Faulkner William (n° 2), judgment of 04/06/2002, final on 04/09/2002

H46-            65905          Rice, judgment of 01/10/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-            42007          Davies, judgment of 16/07/2002, final on 16/10/2002, rectified on 13/09/2002

H46-            24265          Devenney, judgment of 19/03/02, final on 19/06/02

H46-            46477          Edwards Paul and Audrey, judgment of 14/03/02, final on 14/06/02[141]

Section 3.a

H46-            25680          I., judgment of 11/07/2002 - Grand Chamber[142]

H46-            28957          Goodwin Christine, judgment of 11/07/2002 - Grand Chamber[143]

H46-            40302          Matthews Michael, judgment of 15/07/2002 - Friendly settlement

- 1 case against « the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia »

H46-            58185          Janeva, judgment of 03/10/2002 - Friendly settlement

3.b              SUPERVISION OF THE PAYMENT OF THE CAPITAL SUM OF THE JUST

                   SATISFACTION IN CASES WHERE THE DEADLINE FOR PAYMENT

                   EXPIRED MORE THAN 6 MONTHS AGO

Some of the cases appearing under this section concern late payment for reasons beyond the control of the Governments concerned.

Expiry date

of the time-limit set

- 12 cases against France

H32-            26984          Picard                                                                                                  31/01/1999

H32-            25971          Proma di Franco Gianotti, Interim Resolution DH(99)566          14/05/00+02/01/2001

H32-            31409          Riccobono, Interim Resolution DH(99)557                                              26/09/2001

H46-            35683          Vaudelle, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 06/09/01                                  06/12/2001

H46-            44451          A.A.U., judgment of 19/06/01, final on 19/09/01                                     19/12/2001

H32-            26242          Lemoine Pierre, Interim Resolution DH(99)353                                        17/03/2002

H46-            44069          G.B. II, judgment of 02/10/01, final on 02/01/02                                      02/04/2002

H46-            37794          Pannullo and Forte, judgment of 30/10/01, final on 30/01/02                   30/04/2002

H46-            33023          Meier, judgment of 07/02/02 – Friendly settlement                                  07/05/2002

H32-            29877          Pauchet and others - Interim Resolution DH(98)100                                24/07/2002

H46-            44070          Beljanski, judgment of 07/02/02, final on 07/05/02                                  07/08/2002

H46-            39278          Langlois, judgment of 07/02/02, final on 07/05/02                                   07/08/2002

- 124 cases against Italy

H46-            20855          Esposito Luigi, judgment of 25/05/00 - Friendly settlement                     25/08/2000

H46-            35972          Grande Oriente D’Italia du Palazzo Giustiniani,

                                      judgment of 02/08/01, final on 12/12/01                                                 12/03/2002

H46-            31143          Indelicato, judgment of 18/10/01, final on 18/01/02                                 18/04/2002

H46-            31260          Lamperi Balenci, judgment of 21/02/02 - Friendly settlement                   21/05/2002

H46-            25639          F.L., judgment of 20/12/01, final on 20/03/02                                         20/06/2002

H46-            30127          Sciortino, judgment of 18/10/01, final on 27/03/02                                  27/06/2002

H46-            41232          Quartucci, judgment of 28/03/02 – Friendly settlement                            28/06/2002

H46-            47247          Mercuri, judgment of 11/04/02 - Friendly settlement                                11/07/2002

- Civil courts[144]

H32-            25249          Cazzorla and Gigante                                                                            25/09/1996

H46-            44375          Rocchi Roberto, judgment of 29/03/01 - Friendly settlement                   29/06/2001

H46-            44524          Ragas, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02[145]                                   23/04/2002

H46-            44513          D’Ammassa and Frezza, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02            25/04/2002

H46-            49372          De Pilla, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02                                    25/04/2002

H46-            44446          Di Girolamo and 6 others, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02          25/04/2002

H46-            44421          Galasso, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02                                   25/04/2002

H46-            44501          Il Messaggero S.A.S. VI, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02           25/04/2002

H46-            49314          Steiner and Hassid Steiner, judgment of 06/12/2001,

                                      final on 06/03/2002                                                                               06/06/2002

H46-            51671          Arrigoni, judgment of 11/12/2001, final on 11/03/2002                             11/06/2002

H46-            51678          Baioni and Badini, judgment of 11/12/2001, final on 11/03/2002              11/06/2002

Section 3.b

H46-            51667          Bertot, judgment of 11/12/2001, final on 11/03/2002                               11/06/2002

H46-            51696          Cappelletti and Dell’Agnese, judgment of 11/12/2001,

                                      final on 11/03/2002                                                                               11/06/2002

H46-            51708          I.M., judgment of 11/12/2001, final on 11/03/2002                                   11/06/2002

H46-            51668          Lopriore, judgment of 11/12/2001, final on 11/03/2002                            11/06/2002

H46-            51706          Mannari, judgment of 11/12/2001, final on 11/03/2002                             11/06/2002

H46-            51704          Rota Giacomo and Gianfranco, judgment of 11/12/2001,

                                      final on 11/03/2002                                                                               11/06/2002

H46-            51705          Rota Roberto and Giuseppe, judgment of 11/12/2001,

                                      final on 11/03/2002                                                                               11/06/2002

H46-            51710          Rossi Gianbattista, judgment of 11/12/2001, final on 11/03/2002             11/06/2002

H46-            51672          Selva, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02                                       11/06/2002

H46-            51670          Sordelli and C. S.n.c., judgment of 11/12/2001, final on 11/03/2002        11/06/2002

H46-            51711          Spanu, judgment of 11/12/2001, final on 11/03/2002                               11/06/2002

H46-            51673          Tiozzo Peschiero L. and L., judgment of 11/12/2001,

                                      final on 11/03/2002                                                                               11/06/2002

H46-            51707          Vanzetti, judgment of 11/12/2001, final on 11/03/2002                            11/06/2002

H46-            41803          Pupillo, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00; revised judgment on

                                      just satisfaction of 18/12/01, final on 18/03/02                                       18/06/2002

H46-            52979          An.M., judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02                                      12/08/2002

H46-            52987          Barone Antonio and others, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02       12/08/2002

H46-            52974          Beneventano, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02                            12/08/2002

H46-            52914          Bruno Paolo, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02                             12/08/2002

H46-            56092          Calvagni and Formiconi, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02            12/08/2002

H46-            52915          Cazzato, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02                                   12/08/2002

H46-            52970          Ciancetta and Mancini, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02               12/08/2002

H46-            56095          Colasanti, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02                                 12/08/2002

H46-            56085          Cristina, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02                                    12/08/2002

H46-            52925          D’Alfonso, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02                                12/08/2002

H46-            52921          Damiano, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02                                  12/08/2002

H46-            52920          De Rosa Francesco, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02                  12/08/2002

H46-            52923          De Santis III, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02                             12/08/2002

H46-            52968          Del Bono and others, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02                12/08/2002

H46-            56106          Dell’Aquila, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02                               12/08/2002

H46-            52978          Di Niso, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02                                    12/08/2002

H46-            44519          E.M. II, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02                                      12/08/2002

H46-            52972          Falzarano Carmine, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02                    12/08/2002

H46-            52916          Ferrara Vincenza, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02                       12/08/2002

H46-            52984          Ge.Im.A.S.a.s., judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02                         12/08/2002

H46-            56099          Genovesi, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02                                 12/08/2002

H46-            52957          I.P.A. S.r.l., judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02                               12/08/2002

H46-            56088          IT.R., judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02                                        12/08/2002

H46-            52986          L.S., judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02                                         12/08/2002

H46-            52958          Lombardo Francesco, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02               12/08/2002

H46-            52919          Luciani, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02                                     12/08/2002

H46-            52973          Mattaliano, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02                                12/08/2002

H46-            56101          Mesiti, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02                                      12/08/2002

H46-            52926          Mostacciuolo, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02                           12/08/2002

H46-            56089          Murru V, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02                                    12/08/2002

H46-            56098          Pelagatti, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02                                  12/08/2002

H46-            52976          Policriti and Gioffré, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02                  12/08/2002

H46-            52971          R.L., judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02                                         12/08/2002

H46-            52962          Raffio, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02                                      12/08/2002

H46-            52913          Rapisarda, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02                                12/08/2002

H46-            52969          Romano Almanio Antonio, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02         12/08/2002

Section 3.b

H46-            52988          Rossi Maria Giovanna, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02               12/08/2002

H46-            52977          Savona II, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02                                 12/08/2002

H46-            52918          Scinto, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02                                      12/08/2002

H46-            52983          Seccia, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02                                     12/08/2002

H46-            52959          Sessa, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02                                      12/08/2002

H46-            52989          Sirufo, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02                                      12/08/2002

H46-            56093          Società Croce Gialla Romana S.a.s., judgment of 12/02/02,

                                      final on 12/05/02                                                                                   12/08/2002

H46-            56105          Spinelli, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02                                    12/08/2002

H46-            56094          Sposito, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02                                   12/08/2002

H46-            52990          Stabile, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02                                     12/08/2002

H46-            52967          Vaccarella, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02                                12/08/2002

H46-            56086          Vazzana, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02                                   12/08/2002

H46-            52960          Ventrone, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02                                  12/08/2002

H46-            56096          Venturin, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02                                   12/08/2002

H46-            52965          Vetrone, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02                                    12/08/2002

H46-            52963          Zotti and Ferrara I, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02                     12/08/2002

H46-            52964          Zotti and Ferrara II, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02                    12/08/2002

H46-            52966          Zotti, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02                                        12/08/2002

- Administrative courts[146]

H32-            15800+        Perego and Romanet                                                                            12/04/1993

H32-            27189          Bevilacqua                                                                                           21/10/1997

H46-            44330          Principe and others, judgment of 19/12/00 - Friendly settlement              19/03/2001

H46-            41806          Alesiani and 510 others, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01             27/08/2001

H46-            41805          Arivella, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01                                    27/08/2001

H46-            41804          Ciotta, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01                                      27/08/2001

H46-            35956          Galatà and others, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01                     27/08/2001

H46-            44525          Ferrari Marcella II, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02                      25/04/2002

H46-            44379          Finessi, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02                                     25/04/2002

H46-            44343          Massimo Giuseppe I, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02                 25/04/2002

H46-            44352          Massimo Giuseppe II, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02                25/04/2002

H46-            44345          Rinaudo and others, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02                  25/04/2002

H46-            44346          Venturini Alberto II, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02                    25/04/2002

H46-            44342          Gattuso, judgment of 06/12/2001, final on 06/03/2002                            06/06/2002

H46-            44333          V.P. and F.D.R., judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02                       12/08/2002

- Labour courts[147]

H46-            43097          Nicoli, judgment of 22/06/00 – Friendly settlement                                  22/09/2000

H46-            56091          Bernardini, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02                                12/08/2002

H46-            56103          Bevilacqua Giovanni, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02                 12/08/2002

H46-            56104          Cullari, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02                                      12/08/2002

H46-            52924          Frattini and others, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02,

                                      Revised on 26/11/2002, final on 26/02/2003[148]                                        12/08/2002

H46-            51677          Meneghini, judgment of 11/12/2001, final on 11/03/2002                         11/06/2002

H46-            52982          Sciacchitano and Lo Sciuto, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02      12/08/2002

H46-            52917          Serino Antonella, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02                       12/08/2002

H46-            52922          Tommaso, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02                                12/08/2002

Section 3b

- Cour of Audit

H46-            44365          Calvani, judgment of 21/11/00, final on 21/02/01                                    21/05/2001

H46-            44370          D’Innella, judgment of 21/11/00, final on 21/02/01                                   21/05/2001

H46-            44367          G.G. IV, judgment of 21/11/00, final on 21/02/01                                    21/05/2001

H46-            44369          Pe.C., judgment of 21/11/00, final on 21/02/01                                       21/05/2001

H46-            44368          Sapia, judgment of 21/11/00, final on 21/02/01                                       21/05/2001

H46-            44362          Di Deco, judgment of 12/04/01 – Friendly settlement                              12/07/2001

H46-            54307          Meleddu, judgment of 21/02/02 – Friendly settlement                             21/05/2002

H46-            54316          Betti, judgment of 28/03/02 – Friendly settlement                                   28/06/2002

H46-            54293          Chiappetta Domenico, judgment of 28/03/02 – Friendly settlement          28/06/2002

H46-            54287          Ferrari Sergio, judgment of 28/03/02 – Friendly settlement                      28/06/2002

H46-            54299          Libertini and Di Girolamo, judgment of 28/03/02 – Friendly settlement     28/06/2002

H46-            44359          Marrama, judgment of 28/03/02 – Friendly settlement                             28/06/2002

H46-            54286          Strangi, judgment of 07/05/02 – Friendly settlement                               07/08/2002

- 6 cases against Poland

H46-            26760          Werner, judgment of 15/11/01                                                               15/02/2002

H32-            27506          Owczarzak, Interim Resolution DH(99)260                                              17/03/2002

H46-            38328          Bejer, judgment of 04/10/01, final on 04/01/02[149]                                     04/04/2002

H46-            32499          Z.R., judgment of 15/01/02 – Friendly settlement                                    15/04/2002

H46-            25196          Iwańczuk, judgment of 15/11/01, final on 15/02/02                                  15/05/2002

H46-            34052          Olstowski, judgment of 15/11/01, final on 15/02/02                                 15/05/2002

- 3 cases against Portugal

H46-            43999          Martins Serra and Andrade Cancio, judgment of 06/12/01,

                                      final on 06/03/02                                                                                   06/06/2002

H46-            49018          Marques Jorge Ribeiro, judgment of 04/04/02 – Friendly settlement        04/07/2002

H46-            45560          Guerreiro, judgment of 31/01/02, final on 30/04/02                                  30/07/2002

- 51 cases against Turkey

H54-            15318          Loizidou, judgments of 18/12/96 (merits) and 28/07/98

                                      (just satisfaction) - Interim Resolutions DH(99)680, DH(2000)105

                                      and ResDH(2001)80[150]                                                                           28/10/1998

H46-            25723          Erdoğdu, judgment of 15/06/00[151]                                                          15/09/2000

H46-            27308          Demiray, judgment of 21/11/00, final on 04/04/01                                   04/07/2001

H46-            34688          Akin, judgment of 12/04/01                                                                   12/07/2001

H46-            19265          Atak and others, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01                        30/07/2001

H46-            19279          Göçmen and others, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01                  30/07/2001

H46-            19285          Karabulut Cemile and others, judgment of 30/01/01,

                                      final on 30/04/01                                                                                   30/07/2001

H46-            19303          Şen Celal and Keziban, judgment of 10/04/01, final on 10/07/01              10/10/2001

H46-            19661          Çalkan Gülnahar, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01                       05/12/2001

H46-            19662          Çalkan Rabia, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01                            05/12/2001

H46-            19663          Çapar Ekrem, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01                            05/12/2001

H46-            19664          Çelebi Hamdi, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01                           05/12/2001

H46-            19665          Çalkan Seyfettin, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01                       05/12/2001

H46-            19666          Çapar Nuri, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01                                05/12/2001

H46-            19668          Dalgiç Hayrettin, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01                        05/12/2001

H46-            19669          Dalgiç Necati, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01                           05/12/2001

Section 3.b

H46-            19670          Dişçi Dursun, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01                            05/12/2001

H46-            19671          Dişçi Hasan, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01                             05/12/2001

H46-            19672          Dişçi Osman, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01                            05/12/2001

H46-            19673          Güneysu Davut, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01                        05/12/2001

H46-            19674          Kartal Ali, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01                                  05/12/2001

H46-            19675          Koç Hasan, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01                               05/12/2001

H46-            19676          Koçer Ayse, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01                              05/12/2001

H46-            19678          Öztürk Ali, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01                                 05/12/2001

H46-            19679          Öztürk Gülfiye, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01                          05/12/2001

H46-            19681          Öztürk Kamil, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01                            05/12/2001

H46-            19682          Öztürk Muhsin, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01                          05/12/2001

H46-            19683          Öztürk Mustafa, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01                         05/12/2001

H46-            19640          Akça Halim, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01                              03/01/2002

H46-            19641          Akçay Mehmet, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01                         03/01/2002

H46-            19642          Akkaya Ahmet, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01                          03/01/2002

H46-            19643          Akkaya İbrahim, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01                        03/01/2002

H46-            19644          Akkaya Mustafa, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01                       03/01/2002

H46-            19645          Balci Hüseyin, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01                           03/01/2002

H46-            19646          Balci Macit, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01                               03/01/2002

H46-            19647          Baltekin Bilge, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01                           03/01/2002

H46-            19648          Başar Halil, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01                               03/01/2002

H46-            19649          Başar Talip, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01                               03/01/2002

H46-            19650          Bilgin Ahmet, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01                            03/01/2002

H46-            19651          Bilgin Mahmut, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01                          03/01/2002

H46-            19652          Bilgin Mehmet II, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01                        03/01/2002

H46-            19653          Bilgiç Yusuf, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01                             03/01/2002

H46-            19654          Dinç Fethiye, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01                             03/01/2002

H46-            19655          Dokel Ünzile, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01                             03/01/2002

H46-            19656          Eğrikale Saadettin, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01                    03/01/2002

H46-            19657          Erol Naside II, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01                           03/01/2002

H46-            19658          Erol Recep, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01                               03/01/2002

H46-            19659          Erol Sefer, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01                                03/01/2002

H46-            30492          Erat and Sağlam, judgment of 26/03/02 – Friendly settlement                 26/06/2002

H46-            28505          Ülger, judgment of 28/03/02 – Friendly settlement                                  28/06/2002

H46-            29856          Özcan Mehmet, judgment of 09/04/02 – Friendly settlement                    09/07/2002

- 4 cases against the United Kingdom

H46-            28883          McKerr, judgment of 04/05/01, final on 04/08/01[152]                                     04/11/01

H46-            37715          Shanaghan, judgment of 04/05/01, final on 04/08/01[153]                               04/11/01

H46-            24746          Hugh Jordan, judgment of 04/05/01, final on 04/08/01[154]                             04/11/01

H46-            30054          Kelly and others, judgment of 04/05/01, final on 04/08/01[155]                        04/11/01

Table summarising the total number of cases by States

State	No confirmation of payment of the capital sum	No confirmation of payment of the capital sum although payment due since more than 6 months	Payment after expiration of the time-limit set and no confirmation of payment of the default interest due

3.c               EXAMINATION OF SPECIAL PAYMENT PROBLEMS (FOR EXAMPLE THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THE APPLICANT, DISPUTES REGARDING THE EXACT AMOUNT PAID AS A RESULT OF EXCHANGE RATE PROBLEMS OR ADMINISTRATIVE FEES)

- 2 cases against Italy

H46-            53708          Mas A. and 207 others, judgment of 07/06/01 – Friendly settlement

H46-            53705          M.L. and 46 others, judgment of 05/04/01 – Friendly settlement

- 37 cases against Turkey

H46-            28635+        Aksoy Ibrahim, judgment of 10/10/00, final on 10/01/01[156]

H46-            30947          Alpay, judgment of 27/02/01 – Friendly settlement

H46-            26093+        B.T. and others, judgment of 14/11/00 – Friendly settlement

H46-            28340          Büyükdağ, judgment of 21/12/00, final on 21/03/01

H46-            25182+        Cankoçak, judgment of 20/02/01, final on 20/05/01

H46-            25724          Cihan, judgment of 30/01/01 – Friendly settlement

H46-            31963          Özel and others, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H46-            26680          Şener, judgment of 18/07/00[157]

H46-            27697+        Yaşar and others, judgment of 14/11/00, final on 14/02/01

H46-            19310          Yilmaz Hamit, judgment of 10/04/01, final on 10/07/01

H46-            19308          Yilmaz Zekeriya, judgment of 10/04/01, final on 10/07/01

H46-            26976+        Sürek Kamil Tekin V, judgment of 16/07/2002 - Friendly settlement[158]

H54-            22729          Kaya Mehmet, judgment of 19/02/98, Interim Resolutions DH(99)434 and

                                      ResDH(2002)98

H54-            21893          Akdivar, Çiçek, Aktaş, Karabulut, judgment of 16/09/96, Interim Resolutions

                                      DH(99)434 and ResDH(2002)98

H54-            23178          Aydin, judgment of 25/09/97, Interim Resolutions DH(99)434 and ResDH(2002)98

H54-            24276          Kurt, judgment of 25/05/98, Interim Resolutions DH(99)434 and ResDH(2002)98

H54-            23818          Ergi, judgment of 28/07/98, Interim Resolutions DH(99)434 and ResDH(2002)98

H54-            22495          Yaşa, judgment of 02/09/98, Interim Resolutions DH(99)434 and ResDH(2002)98

H46-            23657          Çakici, judgment of 08/07/99, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98

H46-            23763          Tanrikulu, judgment of 08/07/99, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98

H46-            23144          Özgür Gündem, judgment of 16/03/00, Interim Resolution ResDH(2001)106[159]

H46-            22535          Kaya Mahmut, judgment of 28/03/00, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98

H46-            22492          Kiliç, judgment of 28/03/00, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98

H46-            20764          Ertak Ismail, judgment of 09/05/00, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98

H46-            23531          Timurtaş, judgment of 13/06/00, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98

H46-            21986          Salman, judgment of 27/06/00 – Grand Chamber, Interim Resolution

                                      ResDH(2002)98

H46-            22277          Ilhan Nasir, judgment of 27/06/00, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98

H32-            23179+        Yilmaz, Ovat, Şahin and Dündar, Interim Resolutions DH(99)434 and

                                      ResDH(2002)98

H32-            25658          Aslantaş Sedat, Interim Resolutions DH(99)560 and ResDH(2001)106[160]

H46-            22947+        Akkoç Nebahat, judgment of 10/10/00, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98

H46-            24396          Taş Beşir, judgment of 14/11/00, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98

H46-            23819          Bilgin İhsan, judgment of 16/11/00, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98

Section 3.c

H46-            22676          Gül Mehmet, judgment of 14/12/00, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98

H46-            25801          Dulaş Zubeyde, judgment of 30/01/01, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98

H46-            22493          Berktay, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01, Interim Resolution

                                      ResDH(2002)98

H46-            24490          Şarli, judgment of 22/05/01, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98

H46-            23954          Akdeniz and others, judgment of 31/05/01, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98

SECTION 4 - CASES RAISING SPECIFIC QUESTION
(INDIVIDUAL MEASURES, MEASURES NOT YET DEFINED OR SPECIAL PROBLEMS)

(See Addendum 4 for part or all these cases)

Action

The Deputies are invited to supervise the progress made in the adoption of the implementing measures in the following cases raising several problems. Supplementary information on some or all the cases listed below will be issued in Addendum 4. The Deputies are invited to resume consideration of these items on a case-by-case basis.

                   SUB-SECTION 4.1 – SUPERVISION OF INDIVIDUAL MEASURES ONLY[161]

- 1 case against Bulgaria

H46-            50963          Al-Nashif and others, judgment of 20/06/2002, final on 20/09/2002[162]

- 2 cases against Germany

H46-            46544          Kutzner, judgment of 26/02/2002, final on 10/07/2002

H46-            33900          P.S., judgment of 20/12/2001, final on 04/09/2002[163]

- 1 case against Portugal

H46-            35593          Galinho Carvalho Matos, judgment of 23/11/99, final on 23/02/00

- 3 cases against the United Kingdom

H54-            19187          Saunders, judgment of 17/12/96, Interim Resolution DH(2000)27

H46-            29522+        I.J.L., G.M.R. and A.K.P., judgment of 19/09/00

H46-            36533          Atlan A. and T., judgment of 19/06/01, final on 19/09/01

                   SUB-SECTION 4.2 – INDIVIDUAL MEASURES AND/OR GENERAL PROBLEMS

- 1 case against Austria

H46-            32636          A.T., judgment of 21/03/2002, final on 21/06/2002

- 2 cases against Cyprus

H46-            30873          Egmez, judgment of 21/12/00

H46-            25316+        Denizci and others, judgment of 23/05/01, final on 23/08/01

- 5 cases against Croatia

H46-            54727          Cerin, judgment of 15/11/01, final on 15/02/02

H46-            52634          Futterer, judgment of 20/12/01, final on 20/03/02

H46-            51585          Horvat, judgment of 26/07/01, final on 26/10/01

H46-            49706          Rajak, judgment of 28/06/01, final on 12/12/01

H46-            48771          Delić, judgment of 27/06/2002, final on 27/09/2002

- 1 case against Finland

H46-            28856          Jokela, judgment of 21/05/2002, final on 21/08/2002

- 16 cases against France

H46-            32872          Peltier, judgment of 21/05/2002, final on 21/08/2002

H46-            38436          APBP, judgment of 21/03/2002, final on 21/06/2002

H46-            36515          Fretté, judgment of 26/02/02, final on 26/05/02

H46-            46044          Lallement, judgment of 11/04/2002, final on 11/07/2002

H46-            36436          Piron, judgment of 14/11/00, final on 14/02/01

H46-            36677          SA Dangeville, judgment of 16/04/2002, final on 16/07/2002

                   - Cases of length of proceedings concerning civil rights and obligations before administrative courts

H46-            55672          Beaume Marty, judgment of 19/03/02, final on 19/06/02

H46-            46280          Benzi, judgment of 19/03/02, final on 19/06/02

H46-            38945          Francisco, judgment of 13/11/01, final on 13/02/02

H46-            49622          Goubert and Labbe, judgment of 19/03/02, final on 19/06/02

H46-            50996          Grand, judgment of 26/03/2002, final on 26/06/2002

H46-            57753          C.K., judgment of 19/03/02, final on 19/06/02

H46-            42189          H.L., judgment of 07/02/02, final on 07/05/02

H46-            44485          Moullet, judgment of 26/03/2002, final on 26/06/2002

H46-            41946+        Ribes J.M. and M.A., judgment of 07/05/2002, final on 07/08/2002

H46-            51818          Société Comabat, judgment of 26/03/2002, final on 26/06/2002

- 4 cases against Greece

H46-            47541          Vasilopoulou, judgment of 21/03/02, final on 21/06/02

H46-            37095          Pialopoulos and others, judgments of 15/02/01, final on 27/06/02 and of 15/05/01,

                                      final on 06/11/2002[164] (Article 41)[165]

Sub-Section 4.2

                   - Cases of length of proceedings concerning civil rights and obligations before administrative courts

H46-            55611          Xenopoulos, judgment of 28/03/2002, final on 04/09/2002[166]

H46-            47891          Spentzouris, judgment of 07/05/2002, final on 07/08/2002

- 2 cases against Ireland

H46-            36887          Quinn, judgment of 21/12/00, final on 21/03/01

H46-            34720          Heaney and McGuinness, judgment of 21/12/00, final on 21/03/01

- 16 cases against Italy

H46-            37119          N.F., judgment of 02/08/2001, final on 12/12/2001[167]

H32-            23924          C.A.R. srl, Interim Resolution DH(98)154

H32-            22716          P.G. II, Interim Resolutions DH(97)18 and ResDH(2002)58

                   - Cases concerning the monitoring of correspondence

H54-            15211          Diana Calogero, judgment of 15/11/96, Interim Resolution ResDH(2001)178

H54-            15943          Domenichini, judgment of 15/11/96, Interim Resolution ResDH(2001)178

H46-            39920          Di Giovine, judgment of 26/07/01, final on 26/10/01

H46-            25498          Messina Antonio 2, judgment of 28/09/00, final on 28/12/00

H46-            31543          Rinzivillo, judgment of 21/12/00, final on 21/03/01, Interim Resolution

                                      ResDH(2001)178

                   - Cases concerning the failure to enforce judicial eviction orders against tenants

H46-            22774          Immobiliare Saffi, judgment of 28/07/99 - Grand Chamber

H32-            20177          Aldini, Interim Resolution DH(97)413

H46-            22534          A.O., judgment of 30/05/00, final on 30/08/00

H46-            22671          G.L. IV, judgment of 03/08/00, final on 03/11/00

H46-            21463          Lunari, judgment of 11/01/01, final on 11/04/01

H46-            24650          P.M., judgment of 11/01/01, final on 12/09/01

H46-            15919          Palumbo Edoardo, judgment of 30/11/00, final on 01/03/01

H46-            23424          Tanganelli, judgment of 11/01/01, final on 11/04/01

- 1 case against Latvia

H46-            46726          Podkolzina, judgment of 09/04/02, final on 09/07/02

- 1 case against Lithuania

H46-            48297          Butkevičius, judgment of 26/03/2002, final on 26/06/2002

- 1 case against Moldova

H46-            45701          Metropolitan Chrurch of Bessarabia and others, judgment of 13/12/01,

                                      final on 27/03/02

- 1 case against Poland

H46-            29692+        R.D., judgment of 18/12/01, final on 18/03/02

Sub-Section 4.2

- 1 case against the Russian federation

H46-            59498          Burdov, judgment of 07/05/2002, final on 04/09/2002[168]

- 28 cases against Turkey

H46-            40035          Jabari, judgment of 11/07/00, final on 11/10/00

H46-            36590          Göç Mehmet, judgment of 11/07/2002 - Grand Chamber

H46-            25753          Özler, judgment of 11/07/2002 - Friendly settlement

                   - Cases of freedom of expression

                   (Interim Resolution ResDH(2001)106)

H46-            28635+        Aksoy Ibrahim, judgment of 10/10/00, final on 10/01/01[169]

H46-            32985          Altan, judgment of 14/05/02 - Friendly settlement

H46-            23462          Arslan, judgment of 08/07/99

H32-            25658          Aslantaş Sedat, Interim Resolution DH(99)560[170]

H46-            23536+        Baskaya and Okçuoğlu, judgment of 08/07/99

H46-            27307          Bayrak Mehmet, judgment of 03/09/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-            23556          Ceylan, judgment of 08/07/99

H46-            28496          E.K., judgment of 07/02/02, final on 07/05/02

H46-            25723          Erdoğdu, judgment of 15/06/00[171]

H46-            25067+        Erdoğdu and Ince, judgment of 08/07/99

H46-            35076          Erol Ali, judgment of 20/06/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-            24919          Gerger, judgment of 08/07/99

H54-            22678          Inçal, judgment of 09/06/98

H46-            23168          Karataş, judgment of 08/07/99

H46-            33179          Karataş Seher, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002[172]

H46-            24246          Okçuoğlu, judgment of 08/07/99

H46-            23144          Özgür Gündem, judgment of 16/03/00,[173]

H46-            22479          Öztürk, judgment of 28/09/99

H46-            23500          Polat, judgment of 08/07/99

H46-            26680          Şener, judgment of 18/07/00[174]

Sub-Section 4.2

H46-            24122          Sürek II, judgment of 08/07/99

H46-            24762          Sürek IV, judgment of 08/07/99

H46-            26976+        Sürek Kamil Tekin V, judgment of 16/07/2002 - Friendly settlement[175]

H46-            23927+        Sürek and Özdemir, judgment of 08/07/99

H46-            29590          Yağmurdereli, judgment of 04/06/2002, final on 04/09/2002[176]

- 11 cases against the United Kingdom

H54-            25599          A., judgment of 23/09/98

H46-            30668+        Wilson and the National Union of journalists; Palmer, Wyeth and the National

                                      Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers; Doolan and others, judgment of

                                      02/07/2002, final on 02/10/2002[177]

H46-            56547          P., C. and S., judgment of 16/07/2002, final on 16/10/2002[178]

H46-            46477          Edwards Paul and Audrey, judgment of 14/03/02, final on 14/06/02[179]

H46-            25680          I., judgment of 11/07/2002 - Grand Chamber[180]

H46-            28957          Goodwin Christine, judgment of 11/07/2002 - Grand Chamber[181]

                   - Cases concerning the security forces

H46-            28883          McKerr, judgment of 04/05/01, final on 04/08/01[182]

H46-            37715          Shanaghan, judgment of 04/05/01, final on 04/08/01[183]

H46-            24746          Hugh Jordan, judgment of 04/05/01, final on 04/08/01[184]

H46-            30054          Kelly and others, judgment of 04/05/01, final on 04/08/01[185]

H46-            43290          McShane, judgment of 28/05/2002, final on 28/08/2002[186]

                   SUB-SECTION 4.3 – SPECIAL PROBLEMS

- 1700 cases against Italy

H46-            39221+        Scozzari and others, judgment of 13/07/00 – Grand Chamber

                                      Interim Resolutions ResDH(2001)65 and ResDH(2001)151, CM/Inf(2001)12 and

                                      CM/Inf(2002)20[187]

                   - 1699 cases concerning the length of judicial proceedings

(see also, for more detailed information, CM/Inf(98)29, CM/Inf(98)40, CM/Inf(99)37, CM/Inf(2000)40, CM/Inf(2000)40-Add, CM/Inf(2001)37 and CM/Inf(2002)47 and Addendum ; Interim Resolutions DH(97)336, DH(99)436, DH(99)437 and ResDH(2000)135)[188]

                   - 1327 cases before the civil courts

H32-            26017          A. and B.T., Interim Resolution DH(96)479

H32-            40581          A. and M.B., Interim Resolution DH(99)564

H32-            35284          A. L.M., Interim Resolution DH(99)565

H32-            31643          A., G., C. and M.B., Interim Resolution DH(97)611

H32-            36653          A., M., R. and R.Z., Interim Resolution DH(99)133

H32-            27194          A.A. and L.M., Interim Resolution DH(97)22

H32-            24166          A.A. I, Interim Resolution DH(96)471

H32-            26021          A.A. II, Interim Resolution DH(96)478

H32-            29135          A.A. III, Interim Resolution DH(97)365

H32-            35296          A.A. IV, Interim Resolution DH(98)391

H32-            26829          A.A.Q. I, Interim Resolution DH(96)615

H32-            26846          A.B. IV, Interim Resolution DH(96)616

H32-            37874+        A.B., E.F. and C.C., Interim Resolution DH(98)392

H32-            30097          A.C. and C.R., Interim Resolution DH(97)444

H32-            26036          A.C. II, Interim Resolution DH(96)480

H32-            23588          A.C. III, Interim Resolution DH(97)559

H32-            27985          A.C. V, Interim Resolution DH(97)159

H32-            38148          A.C. VI, Interim Resolution DH(99)272

H32-            26418          A.F. IV, Interim Resolution DH(96)521

H32-            35334          A.F. V, Interim Resolution DH(98)393

H32-            18067          A.G. I

H32-            36627          A.G. II, Interim Resolution DH(99)134

H32-            39129          A.G. III, Interim Resolution DH(99)474

H32-            26413          A.I. I, Interim Resolution DH(96)522

H32-            35304          A.I. II, Interim Resolution DH(98)394

H32-            31640          A.M. A., Interim Resolution DH(97)612

H32-            29668          A.M. IV, Interim Resolution DH(97)424

H32-            31352          A.M. L., Interim Resolution DH(97)613

H32-            26424          A.M. R., Interim Resolution DH(96)523

H32-            38488          A.P. I, Interim Resolution DH(99)370

H46-            35265          A.P. II, judgment of 28/07/99

H32-            16480          A.R.

H32-            24022          A.S., A.T. and M.S., Interim Resolution DH(95)262

H32-            25999          A.T. IV, Interim Resolution DH(96)481

H32-            27165          A.T. V, Interim Resolution DH(97)23

H32-            24023          A.V., Interim Resolution DH(95)263

Sub-Section 4.3

H46-            40947          Abbate Giuseppe, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00

H32-            28730          Abrami, Interim Resolution DH(97)246

H32-            26842          Adamo Antonia, Interim Resolution DH(96)617

H46-            40944          Adamo Nino Andrea, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00

H32-            39882          Adrignola A., G., and P., Interim Resolution DH(99)566

H32-            34854          Agnello, Interim Resolution DH(98)395

H46-            40963          Aiello, judgment of 14/12/99, final on 14/03/00

H46-            44392          Albergamo, judgment of 28/03/2002, final on 10/07/2002[189]

H46-            49316          Albertosi, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02

H32-            29158          Albertosi, Interim Resolution DH(97)298

H32-            38519          Albini, Interim Resolution DH(99)371

H32-            40617          Alborghetti and Brivio S., E., M.C., and R., Interim Resolution DH(99)567

H46-            45078          Aldo Tripodi, judgment of 12/10/00, final on 12/01/01

H32-            24033          Alessandrini, Interim Resolution DH(95)264

H46-            49371          Alfonsetti, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H46-            44383          Alicino, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H32-            34838          Allegranzi, Interim Resolution DH(98)329

H46-            51651          Allegri, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02

H32-            19752          Aloe

H46-            45084          Altamura, judgment of 12/10/00, final on 12/01/01

H32-            34234          Altieri and Cifani, Interim Resolution DH(98)225

H32-            27459          Aluffi, Interim Resolution DH(97)169

H46-            49353          Am. M. and S.I., judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H32-            37132          Amato, Interim Resolution DH(99)234

H32-            27495          Ambiveri and Arnoldi, Interim Resolution DH(97)91

H32-            26039          American Eagle S.r.l., Interim Resolution DH(96)482

H32-            27982          Amighetti and Jolly Moto S.N.C., Interim Resolution DH(97)156

H32-            29155          Andreoletti, Interim Resolution DH(97)299

H32-            31635          Anfosso, Interim Resolution DH(97)614

H32-            34841          Angeli, Interim Resolution DH(98)330

H32-            24162          Angelone and Celeste, Interim Resolution DH(96)472

H32-            40604          Annibale, Interim Resolution DH(99)568

H32-            28592          Annunziata, Interim Resolution DH(99)51

H32-            26444          Antognelli, Interim Resolution DH(96)524

H46-            46993          Antonini C and A, judgment of 16/01/01, final on 16/04/01

H32-            26836          Antonini V. and I., Interim Resolution DH(96)618

H32-            24796          Antoniotti, Interim Resolution DH(96)38

H32-            27452          Aprile, Interim Resolution DH(97)51

H46-            45881          AR.GE.A S.n.c. en liquidation, judgment of 07/11/00, final on 07/02/01

H32-            24163          Archimede, Interim Resolution DH(96)224

H46-            44628          Aresu, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02

H46-            46987          Arienzo, judgment of 16/01/01, final on 16/04/01

H32-            29720          Arlistico, Interim Resolution DH(97)547

H46-            38098          Arnò, judgment of 09/11/99

H32-            20046          Arruzzolo

H32-            38138          Artefice, Interim Resolution DH(99)273

H32-            30099          Artuso Maria Nicoletta, Interim Resolution DH(97)445

H32-            28383          Ass. Consumatori San Gregorio, Interim Resolution DH(98)161

H46-            44456          Atzori, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H32-            38520          Ausiello Pasquale, Interim Resolution DH(99)372

H32-            30094          Ausilio, Interim Resolution DH(97)446

H32-            28729          Avellani, Interim Resolution DH(97)247

Sub-Section 4.3

H32-            25287          Azzarà, Interim Resolution DH(96)483

H32-            29129          B.A. S., Interim Resolution DH(97)300

H32-            26849          B.M., Interim Resolution DH(96)619

H32-            35940          B.Z., Interim Resolution DH(99)52

H32-            39119          Baffoni, Interim Resolution DH(99)476

H32-            28727          Baglietto, Interim Resolution DH(97)248

H32-            40587          Bagnarelli, Interim Resolution DH(99)570

H46-            44433          Bagnetti and Bellini, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02

H32-            26410          Bakovic, Interim Resolution DH(96)525

H32-            37135          Balderi, Interim Resolution DH(99)135

H46-            49362          Baldi, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H46-            47001          Baldini, judgment of 16/01/01, final on 16/04/01

H32-            34852          Balzani, Interim Resolution DH(98)331

H32-            27964          Baracchini, Interim Resolution DH(97)142

H32-            38101          Baranelli, Interim Resolution DH(99)274

H32-            35294          Barbagiovanni Gasparo, Interim Resolution DH(98)396

H32-            39117          Barbarino I, Interim Resolution DH(99)477

H32-            39142          Barbarino II, Interim Resolution DH(99)478

H46-            38109          Bargagli, judgment of 09/11/99

H46-            49377          Barnaba, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H46-            49369          Baroni and Michinelli, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H32-            34268          Barraco, Interim Resolution DH(98)226

H32-            38507          Bartolini I, Interim Resolution DH(99)373

H32-            39895          Bartolini II, Interim Resolution DH(99)571

H46-            44458          Bartolini III, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H32-            29662          Bartolucci, Interim Resolution DH(97)526

H32-            35342          Basile Bernardo Domenico, Interim Resolution DH(98)397

H32-            34863          Basile and Perazza, Interim Resolution DH(98)317

H32-            26011          Basile Rocco Antonio and Nicolò, Interim Resolution DH(96)484

H46-            40928          Battistelli, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00

H32-            34260          Baudone, Interim Resolution DH(98)227

H32-            35921          Bazzea, Interim Resolution DH(99)53

H46-            49315          Bazzoni, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02

H32-            39128          Bedin, Interim Resolution DH(99)479

H32-            27969          Belletti, Interim Resolution DH(97)146

H32-            27476          Bellio, Interim Resolution DH(97)170

H46-            51661          Beluzzi and Mangili, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02

H32-            30593          Berardini Angelo I, Interim Resolution DH(97)527

H32-            35286          Berardini Angelo II, Interim Resolution DH(99)54

H32-            26826          Bergonzini, Interim Resolution DH(96)620

H46-            44435          Berlani, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H32-            34869          Bernardi, Interim Resolution DH(98)398

H32-            34261          Bernardoni, Interim Resolution DH(98)399

H46-            46995          Berto, judgment of 16/01/01, final on 16/04/01

H32-            38493          Bertuccelli, Interim Resolution DH(99)374

H46-            44388          Besati, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02

H46-            51695          Bettella, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02

H32-            29652          Bianchi Armando, Interim Resolution DH(97)425

H32-            26817          Bianchi Ines, Interim Resolution DH(96)621

H32-            26027          Biasci, Interim Resolution DH(97)52

H32-            33802          Bimbi, Interim Resolution DH(98)162

H46-            40937          Binelis and Nanni, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00

H46-            49358          Bini, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H32-            34266          Bisaro, Interim Resolution DH(98)228

Sub-Section 4.3

H32-            26845          Bizzotto, Interim Resolution DH(97)92

H32-            38482          Boccabella and Torlone, Interim Resolution DH(99)375

H32-            22944          Boccardi and Comune, Interim Resolution DH(96)225

H32-            35308          Bogliolo Giacomo I, Interim Resolution DH(98)400

H32-            35309          Bogliolo Giacomo II, Interim Resolution DH(98)401

H32-            35311          Bogliolo Giacomo III, Interim Resolution DH(98)402

H32-            27181          Bogliolo Mario, Interim Resolution DH(97)93

H32-            37175          Bolignari, Interim Resolution DH(99)136

H46-            49313          Bonacci and others, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02

H32-            25257          Bonaccorso, Interim Resolution DH(96)163

H32-            34247          Bonanno, Interim Resolution DH(98)229

H32-            38133          Bonetti, Interim Resolution DH(99)275

H32-            19838          Bonfanti I

H32-            19839          Bonfanti II

H32-            19840          Bonfanti III

H32-            19841          Bonfanti IV

H32-            19842          Bonfanti V

H32-            19843          Bonfanti VI

H32-            19837          Bonfanti VII, Interim Resolution DH(96)226

H32-            29150          Bonforte, Interim Resolution DH(97)301

H32-            26840          Bongianni R. and F. M., Interim Resolution DH(96)622

H32-            38516          Bongiovanni, Interim Resolution DH(99)376

H46-            45059          Bono, judgment of 17/10/00, final on 17/01/01

H32-            39902          Bonomi A. and S., Interim Resolution DH(99)572

H32-            38114          Bonvicini, Interim Resolution DH(99)276

H32-            31347          Bordogna, Interim Resolution DH(97)615

H32-            33782          Borracci, Interim Resolution DH(98)163

H32-            37148          Borromeo, Interim Resolution DH(99)137

H32-            31358          Borselli, Interim Resolution DH(97)616

H32-            24816          Boscaro, Interim Resolution DH(96)40

H46-            36608          Bosio and Moretti, judgment of 06/09/99

H32-            30108          Botta II, Interim Resolution DH(97)447

H32-            27979          Botti, Interim Resolution DH(97)154

H32-            21075          Bottiglieri

H32-            29650          Bramante, Interim Resolution DH(97)426

H32-            40620          Bricalli, Interim Resolution DH(99)573

H46-            51660          Brivio, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02

H32-            29139          Broccia, Interim Resolution DH(97)302

H32-            27952          Bruno Emanuele, Interim Resolution DH(97)175

H32-            33790          Buldini Kotecha, Interim Resolution DH(98)164

H32-            32284          Buompastore, Interim Resolution DH(98)22

H32-            34872          Buonfino, Interim Resolution DH(98)332

H46-            48419          Buonocore, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02

H32-            39879          Burigat, Interim Resolution DH(99)574

H46-            51682          Butta, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02

H32-            34857          C. C., Interim Resolution DH(98)403

H32-            27988          C. D.C. (Di Cara), Interim Resolution DH(97)178

H32-            33131          C. D.L., Interim Resolution DH(98)101

H32-            39898          C., G., and N.A., and T.M., Interim Resolution DH(99)575

H46-            49302          C.A.I.F., judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02

H32-            38146          C.B. and F.E.V., Interim Resolution DH(99)277

H32-            38099          C.B.S., Interim Resolution DH(99)278

H32-            35912          C.C. and 5 others, Interim Resolution DH(99)55

H32-            31330          C.I.P.D.I. S.r.l., Interim Resolution DH(97)617

Sub-Section 4.3

H32-            34243          C.L.P.C., Interim Resolution DH(98)230

H32-            30587          C.M. I, Interim Resolution DH(97)528

H32-            35944          C.M. II, Interim Resolution DH(99)56

H32-            30582          C.M.R. L.C., Interim Resolution DH(97)529

H32-            31641          C.R.A.D.C.C. S.r.l., Interim Resolution DH(97)618

H32-            35340          Cacace, Interim Resolution DH(98)404

H32-            37151          Caccamo, Interim Resolution DH(99)138

H32-            39875          Caccialupi Olivieri Parteguelfa and Ciarrocchi, Interim Resolution DH(99)576

H32-            26443          Cacciola, Interim Resolution DH(96)647

H32-            31334          Cairo, Interim Resolution DH(97)619

H32-            34829          Calandra, Interim Resolution DH(98)318

H32-            38129          Calanna, Interim Resolution DH(99)279

H32-            19830          Calaudi

H46-            46541          Calbini, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01

H32-            40588          Calderone R., A.M., A.M., and E., Interim Resolution DH(99)577

H32-            35941          Caldora, Interim Resolution DH(99)57

H32-            35305          Calipso Montana s.r.l., Interim Resolution DH(98)406

H32-            27473          Calistri, Interim Resolution DH(97)180

H32-            26430          Callegari, Interim Resolution DH(96)527

H46-            36624          Calor Sud, judgment of 26/10/99

H46-            51649          Camici, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02

H32-            23203          Camodeca, Interim Resolution DH(96)227

H46-            48423          Campana, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02

H32-            27472          Campoli, Interim Resolution DH(97)53

H32-            37140          Canali, Interim Resolution DH(99)139

H46-            51680          Canapicchi, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02

H32-            34855          Canocchi, Interim Resolution DH(98)319

H46-            40959          Cantacessi, judgment of 14/12/99, final on 14/03/00

H46-            47004          Cantu, judgment of 16/01/01, final on 16/04/01

H32-            27959          Capezzali, Interim Resolution DH(97)139

H46-            41802          Capoccia Agnese, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00

H32-            38137          Caporaso Adamo, Interim Resolution DH(99)280

H46-            40951          Cappellaro, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00

H32-            39161          Capriotti, Interim Resolution DH(99)481

H32-            30583          Capulli, Interim Resolution DH(97)530

H46-            45074          Caputo, judgment of 12/10/00, final on 12/01/01

H46-            44382          Caracciolo, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02

H32-            33152          Carbonaro, Interim Resolution DH(98)102

H32-            25265          Carbone Alessandro, Interim Resolution DH(96)211

H32-            38523          Carbone Benito, Interim Resolution DH(99)377

H46-            51702          Carbone, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02

H32-            39165          Carcani and Monterosso, Interim Resolution DH(99)482

H32-            29153          Carcassi I, Interim Resolution DH(97)303

H32-            31339          Carcassi II, Interim Resolution DH(97)620

H32-            25230          Cariola E. and M.R., Interim Resolution DH(96)228

H32-            27179          Carlino, Interim Resolution DH(97)24

H32-            35297          Carloni Natale, Interim Resolution DH(98)407

H32-            27978          Carloni Paolo, Interim Resolution DH(97)153

H32-            37147          Carnevali, Interim Resolution DH(99)140

H32-            39159          Carozza, Interim Resolution DH(99)483

H46-            44516          Carrone, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02

H32-            35301          Carrubba, Interim Resolution DH(98)408

H46-            44399          Cartoleria Poddighe S.N.C., judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02

H32-            26035          Caruso Salvatore, Interim Resolution DH(96)486

Sub-Section 4.3

H32-            26406          Caruso, Giardiello and Caruso, Interim Resolution DH(96)528

H32-            27182          Casanica, Interim Resolution DH(97)167

H32-            27470          Casavola, Interim Resolution DH(97)54

H32-            31335          Casilli, Interim Resolution DH(97)621

H32-            35332          Casini, Interim Resolution DH(98)409

H32-            37313          Cassa Edile della Provincia di Ascoli Piceno, Interim Resolution DH(99)578

H32-            37137          Cassandra Luigi II, Interim Resolution DH(99)207

H46-            40961          Cassetta, judgment of 14/12/99, final on 14/03/00

H46-            51679          Cassin, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02

H46-            40962          Castelli Elia, judgment of 14/12/99, final on 14/03/00

H32-            35333          Castelli Massimiliano, Interim Resolution DH(98)410

H32-            34233          Castellucci Galtrucco, Interim Resolution DH(98)237

H46-            44448          Castrogiovanni, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H32-            34843          Casula, Interim Resolution DH(98)411

H46-            46510          Catalano, judgment of 21/11/00, final on 21/02/01

H46-            45075          Catania and Zuppelli, judgment of 21/12/00, final on 06/04/01

H32-            29161          Cavadini, Interim Resolution DH(97)304

H32-            26860          Cavallin, Interim Resolution DH(96)623

H32-            38487          Cavallini and Gualersi, Interim Resolution DH(99)378

H32-            25215          Caviglia, Interim Resolution DH(96)164

H32-            34272          Cecchi, Interim Resolution DH(98)231

H46-            40936          Cecere (Maria Rosaria), judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00

H32-            27479          Cecere Pasquale, Interim Resolution DH(97)55

H32-            29138          Ceglia, Interim Resolution DH(97)305

H32-            37154          Celebre, Interim Resolution DH(99)141

H32-            29136          Celi Lelio, Interim Resolution DH(97)306

H32-            29647          Celi Leonida, Interim Resolution DH(97)427

H46-            44429          Centi I, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02

H46-            44432          Centi II, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02

H32-            39150          Centi, Interim Resolution DH(99)484

H46-            44377          Centineo, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H32-            27196          Centore, Interim Resolution DH(97)25

H32-            20554          Ceravolo

H32-            34830          Cerqueti, Interim Resolution DH(98)333

H32-            38504          Ceruti, Interim Resolution DH(99)379

H46-            48418          Cesaro, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02

H54-            22461+        Ceteroni, judgment of 15/11/96

H32-            35938          Chiapetto Vincenzo II, Interim Resolution DH(99)142

H32-            13569          Chiarelli

H32-            40582          Chinnici I, Interim Resolution DH(99)579

H46-            49374          Chinnici II, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H32-            26023          CI.ME.B. S.p.a., Interim Resolution DH(96)487

H46-            46989          Ciabocco, judgment of 16/01/01, final on 16/04/01

H32-            27469          Cianci G. and A., Interim Resolution DH(97)56

H32-            35928          Cibin, Interim Resolution DH(99)58

H32-            22527          Cicely and others, Interim Resolution DH(96)27

H32-            35303          Cicerone E., S., S. and D., Interim Resolution DH(98)453

H32-            29654          Cicino, Interim Resolution DH(97)467

H32-            39168          Cilea, Interim Resolution DH(99)485

H32-            31333          Ciliberti, Interim Resolution DH(97)622

H32-            31336          Cimenti, Interim Resolution DH(97)624

H32-            26862          Cimini, Interim Resolution DH(96)624

H32-            35914          Cimino Antonio, Interim Resolution DH(99)59

H32-            33792          Cims Iole, Interim Resolution DH(98)165

Sub-Section 4.3

H32-            31346          Cims Marco, Interim Resolution DH(97)625

H32-            35902          Cipolletti, Interim Resolution DH(99)60

H32-            36603          Cirillo, Interim Resolution DH(99)143

H32-            29648          Cirino, Interim Resolution DH(97)428

H46-            40955          Cittadini and Ruffini, judgment of 14/12/99, final on 14/03/00

H46-            46999          Ciuffetelli, judgment of 16/01/01, final on 16/04/01

H32-            27474          Ciuffetelli, Interim Resolution DH(97)94

H32-            25341          Civelek, Interim Resolution DH(99)580

H32-            37187          Clucher, Interim Resolution DH(99)144

H46-            43434          Cobianchi I, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01

H46-            45852          Cobianchi II, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01

H32-            31344          Coccia, Interim Resolution DH(97)626

H32-            37167          Coduto Fernando I, Interim Resolution DH(99)145

H32-            37181          Coduto Fernando II, Interim Resolution DH(99)146

H32-            38509          Cogo, Interim Resolution DH(99)380

H32-            40590          Colangelo, Interim Resolution DH(99)581

H32-            35925          Colautti, Interim Resolution DH(99)61

H32-            26024          Comentale, Interim Resolution DH(96)488

H32-            20010          Condoluci and Napoli

H32-            29669          Condoluci, Interim Resolution DH(97)429

H46-            44460          Condominio Citta di Prato, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H32-            34842          Condominio Rosa Dei Venti, Interim Resolution DH(98)334

H32-            12168          Condominio via Flaminia. 141

H46-            49375          Consalvo, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H46-            32765          Conte Nunzio II, judgment of 17/10/00, final on 17/01/01

H32-            34239          Conte Riccardo, Interim Resolution DH(98)232

H32-            40589          Conti Elia, Interim Resolution DH(99)582

H32-            39160          Copropriété X., Interim Resolution DH(99)486

H32-            38128          Coralluzzo, Interim Resolution DH(99)281

H46-            48416          Corcelli, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02

H32-            39140          Corso and Facchetti, Interim Resolution DH(99)525

H32-            27201          Cortellessa, Interim Resolution DH(97)26

H32-            27199          Cosma Bonifacio, Interim Resolution DH(97)27

H46-            45884          Cossu, judgment of 07/11/00, final on 07/02/01

H32-            27164          Covi and Anzelini, Interim Resolution DH(97)28

H32-            19827          Crea

H46-            49309          Crotti, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02

H32-            24027          Crovato, Interim Resolution DH(95)275

H32-            20332          Crupi and others

H32-            40583          Cucinotta Orazio, Interim Resolution DH(99)583

H32-            38105          Cucinotta Tullio, Interim Resolution DH(99)282

H32-            28384          Cunsolo, Interim Resolution DH(98)166

H32-            34827          Curatola, Interim Resolution DH(98)335

H32-            26855          Curatolo and Marucchelli, Interim Resolution DH(96)625

H32-            38524          Curia, Interim Resolution DH(99)381

H32-            25240          Curio, Interim Resolution DH(96)473

H32-            25226          D. and P.D.R. and L.M., Interim Resolution DH(96)167

H32-            34859          D. S., Interim Resolution DH(98)337

H32-            40576          D., F., and F.M. and M.V., Interim Resolution DH(99)584

H32-            27178          D.C. III, Interim Resolution DH(97)57

H46-            46507          D.G., judgment of 21/11/00, final on 21/02/01

H46-            44533          D.I., judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02

H32-            26026          D.M. III, Interim Resolution DH(96)489

H32-            26448          D.M. IV, Interim Resolution DH(96)529

Sub-Section 4.3

H32-            16300          D.S. and O.P., Interim Resolution DH(96)112

H32-            27200          D'Agata, Interim Resolution DH(97)29

H32-            20207          D'Agostino and Pugliese

H32-            38485          Dalla Pozza I, Interim Resolution DH(99)382

H32-            40597          Dalla Pozza II, Interim Resolution DH(99)585

H32-            29127          Dall'Acqua, Interim Resolution DH(97)307

H32-            27968          Dambra, Interim Resolution DH(97)145

H46-            49307          D'Amore, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02

H32-            40603          Dan, Interim Resolution DH(99)586

H32-            29163          Danesi, Interim Resolution DH(97)308

H32-            36651          Danieli, Interim Resolution DH(99)235

H46-            45890          D'Antoni, judgment of 07/11/00, final on 07/02/01

H46-            51662          D'Apice, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02

H46-            49318          D'Arrigo, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02

H32-            39147          Datti A. and F., and Bezzi, Interim Resolution DH(99)487

H32-            38139          De Agazio Fortunato III, Interim Resolution DH(99)283

H32-            37157          De Agazio Giancarlo, Interim Resolution DH(99)147

H32-            30102          De Camillis Emidio, Interim Resolution DH(98)168

H32-            23603          De Camillis Giovanni, Interim Resolution DH(97)95

H32-            33797          De Cicco Nicola, Interim Resolution DH(98)167

H32-            37134          De Cristofaro, Interim Resolution DH(99)148

H46-            51683          De Guz, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02

H46-            40974          De Lisi, judgment of 28/09/00, final on 28/12/00

H32-            26843          De Luca Gianni, Interim Resolution DH(96)661

H32-            22741          De Luca Vincenzo, Interim Resolution DH(96)34

H32-            24805          De Mita, Interim Resolution DH(96)45

H32-            26010          De Mori, Interim Resolution DH(96)491

H32-            36625          De Pasquale, Interim Resolution DH(99)149

H32-            19559          De Santis Armando

H46-            49366          De Santis Giuseppe I, judgment of 25/10/01, final on, 25/01/02

H46-            49367          De Santis Guiseppe II, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H46-            44455          De Simine, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H32-            35287          De Simon and Incontrera, Interim Resolution DH(98)412

H32-            35300          De Simone and 6 others, Interim Resolution DH(98)454

H32-            35949          De Simone, Interim Resolution DH(99)62

H32-            40567          Decaro G., A., M., and F., Interim Resolution DH(99)589

H32-            36640          Del Mistro, Interim Resolution DH(99)150

H32-            24644          Del Prete, Interim Resolution DH(96)229

H32-            35933          Del Sole, Interim Resolution DH(99)63

H32-            37183          Del Vecchio Michele, Interim Resolution DH(99)201

H32-            26015          Delfino, Interim Resolution DH(96)490

H32-            32299          Della Corte, Interim Resolution DH(98)169

H46-            44408+        Delmonte and Badano, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02

H46-            38469          Deschamps, judgment of 15/02/00

H46-            40965          Di Annunzio, judgment of 05/04/00, final on 05/07/00

H32-            27974          Di Bella and others, Interim Resolution DH(97)150

H32-            24853          Di Blasio A. and L., Interim Resolution DH(97)96

H32-            38497          Di Caro, Interim Resolution DH(99)590

H32-            29143          Di Ciccio, Interim Resolution DH(97)470

H32-            37314          Di Cicco, Di Giammatteo and Fantini, Interim Resolution DH(99)644

H32-            34251          Di Domenico, Interim Resolution DH(98)234

H32-            29666          Di Donfrancesco, Interim Resolution DH(97)430

H32-            34851          Di Fabio I, Interim Resolution DH(98)338

H46-            49355          Di Fabio II, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

Sub-Section 4.3

H32-            35910          Di Florio, Interim Resolution DH(99)64

H46-            44495          Di Francesco, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H32-            39130          Di Gianfilippo, Interim Resolution DH(99)490

H32-            36629          Di Giovanni II, Interim Resolution DH(99)151

H32-            36645          Di Girolamo, Interim Resolution DH(99)152

H32-            25242          Di Gregorio, Interim Resolution DH(97)97

H46-            34256          Di Mauro, judgment of 28/07/99

H32-            35285          Di Prisco and Cappon, Interim Resolution DH(98)455

H46-            40970          Di Rosa, judgment of 14/12/99, final on 14/03/00

H32-            35923+        Di Salvo and Formica, Interim Resolution DH(99)65

H46-            45898          Di Teodoro and others, judgment of 07/11/00, final on 07/02/01

H32-            33153          Di Trapani and Crescimanno, Interim Resolution DH(98)123

H32-            26411          Diglio, Interim Resolution DH(96)530

H32-            34840          Dionisi, Interim Resolution DH(98)339

H32-            33160          Domenico and Giusa, Interim Resolution DH(98)103

H32-            34848          Donati, Interim Resolution DH(98)340

H32-            32285          Donato, Interim Resolution DH(98)23

H32-            29665          Donfrancesco M. and A., Interim Resolution DH(97)431

H46-            40925          D'Onofrio Francesco, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00

H32-            34870          D'Orsi, Interim Resolution DH(98)336

H32-            29159          Dotti, Interim Resolution DH(97)370

H32-            38513          Dulcamara and Del Vecchio, Interim Resolution DH(99)383

H32-            40579          E.A., Interim Resolution DH(99)591

H32-            38107          E.B., E.B. and M.B., Interim Resolution DH(99)284

H32-            27186          E.C. II, Interim Resolution DH(97)30

H32-            38484          E.D.C., Interim Resolution DH(99)384

H32-            19824          E.D.G., Interim Resolution DH(97)58

H32-            24817          E.F. and M.C.P., Interim Resolution DH(96)46

H46-            48422          E.I., judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02

H32-            24801          E.M. and A.P., Interim Resolution DH(96)47

H32-            23600          E.M., R.V. and A.S.S.

H32-            23623          E.P. I

H32-            26043          E.P. II, Interim Resolution DH(96)492

H46-            40953          Ediltes S.n.c., judgment of 14/12/99, final on 14/03/00

H32-            24036          Elettrodiffusion S.p.a., Interim Resolution DH(96)35

H32-            27477          Elia, Interim Resolution DH(97)59

H46-            40976          Ercolino and Ambrosino, judgment of 14/12/99, final on 14/03/00

H46-            40926          F. I, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00

H46-            40971          F. II, judgment of 14/12/99, final on 14/03/00

H32-            30577          F., A.M., M.G. and P.P. S., Interim Resolution DH(97)531

H32-            27457          F.B. II, Interim Resolution DH(97)98

H32-            27458          F.B. III, Interim Resolution DH(97)99

H46-            44523          F.C. and F.G., judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H32-            35337          F.C. IV, Interim Resolution DH(98)413

H46-            51653          F.CA., judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02

H32-            26409          F.D.A. II, Interim Resolution DH(96)531

H32-            37143          F.D.L., Interim Resolution DH(99)153

H32-            38505          F.D.S., Interim Resolution DH(99)385

H32-            39869          F.D'A III, Interim Resolution DH(99)593

H32-            39870          F.D'A IV, Interim Resolution DH(99)594

H32-            39874          F.E., Interim Resolution DH(99)595

H32-            26029          F.L., Interim Resolution DH(96)493

H32-            26421          F.P. II, Interim Resolution DH(96)532

H32-            26422          F.P. III, Interim Resolution DH(96)533

Sub-Section 4.3

H32-            38134          F.P.R., Interim Resolution DH(99)431

H32-            30597          F.R., Interim Resolution DH(97)532

H46-            44471          F.S. II, judgment of 21/12/00, final on 21/03/01

H32-            34249          F.V., Interim Resolution DH(98)235

H32-            38499          Fabbiano, Interim Resolution DH(99)386

H32-            38136          Facciolini II, Interim Resolution DH(99)285

H32-            29040          Faieta, Interim Resolution DH(98)25

H32-            38474          Faldetta, Interim Resolution DH(99)387

H32-            36635          Falleni A. and M., Interim Resolution DH(99)154

H32-            25264          Famas S.r.l., Interim Resolution DH(96)171

H32-            35319          Fanni Bruno, Interim Resolution DH(98)414

H32-            36638          Fanni Susanna, Interim Resolution DH(99)155

H32-            39157          Fattore A. and M., Interim Resolution DH(99)491

H32-            40596          Fazioli, Interim Resolution DH(99)596

H32-            20042          Fedele

H46-            45892          Feffin, judgment of 07/11/00, final on 07/02/01

H32-            35935          Feliciano, Interim Resolution DH(99)66

H32-            27957          Feminella, Interim Resolution DH(97)137

H32-            39126          Feneziani, Interim Resolution DH(99)492

H46-            51675          Ferfolja, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02

H46-            44405          Ferraresi, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02

H32-            25216          Ferrari Stefano, Interim Resolution DH(96)172

H32-            27456          Ferraro Salvatore, Interim Resolution DH(97)60

H32-            39156          Ferrazzini, Interim Resolution DH(99)493

H32-            27197          Ferretti Amleto, Interim Resolution DH(97)31

H32-            26835          Ferretti Guido, Interim Resolution DH(96)626

H32-            39880          Ferron, Interim Resolution DH(99)597

H32-            33803          Ficara Carmela, Interim Resolution DH(98)170

H46-            45062          Ficara Domenico, judgment of 17/10/00, final on 17/01/01

H32-            38475          Filippello, Interim Resolution DH(99)598

H32-            34868          Filocamo and Dominijanni, Interim Resolution DH(98)341

H32-            32296          Filosa II, Interim Resolution DH(98)26

H46-            49317          Filosa, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02

H32-            27464          Finvilden S.r.l., Interim Resolution DH(97)61

H32-            30100          Fiorentino, Interim Resolution DH(97)448

H46-            44393          Fiorenza, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02

H32-            36611          Fioretto and De Luca, Interim Resolution DH(99)156

H32-            26832          Firme zia Lilla, Interim Resolution DH(96)627

H32-            38121          Florio and Butera, Interim Resolution DH(99)286

H32-            24050          Foggetti and Quaini, Interim Resolution DH(95)280

H46-            44424          Follo, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H32-            36616          Fondificio A.C.F., Interim Resolution DH(99)157

H32-            39166          Fontana and Sartorio, Interim Resolution DH(99)495

H32-            29653          Foresta, Interim Resolution DH(97)432

H32-            27448+        Formica, Interim Resolution DH(97)62

H32-            26830          Formichetti, Interim Resolution DH(97)100

H32-            22975          Fornara and others

H32-            26420          Forni, Albanese, Centro Orafo Mantovano, Interim Resolution DH(96)534

H46-            45079          Fortunati, judgment of 12/10/00, final on 12/01/01

H46-            46996          Fracchia, judgment of 16/01/01, final on 16/04/01

H32-            26022          Franceschi, Interim Resolution DH(96)494

H46-            46529          Franchina, judgment of 21/12/00, final on 21/03/01

H46-            49373          Franco, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H32-            29124          Frediani, Interim Resolution DH(97)309

Sub-Section 4.3

H32-            27192          Furnari A., G., G. and F., Interim Resolution DH(97)32

H32-            26415          Fusco G., F. and P., Interim Resolution DH(96)556

H32-            36655          G. D'A., Interim Resolution DH(99)159

H32-            16014          G. and A.P.

H46-            44510          G. and C.C., judgment of 23/10/01, final on 27/03/02

H32-            31355          G. and I.B., Interim Resolution DH(97)628

H46-            46997          G. Giappichelli Editore S.r.l., judgment of 16/01/01, final on 16/04/01

H32-            31356          G. S.r.l., Interim Resolution DH(97)627

H32-            33161          G., R. and V. V., Interim Resolution DH(98)104

H32-            35945          G.A. and 7 others, Interim Resolution DH(99)67

H32-            19496          G.B. II, Interim Resolution DH(97)110

H32-            33134+        G.B., A.C. and L.V., Interim Resolution DH(98)105

H32-            33136          G.B.C., Interim Resolution DH(98)106

H32-            32290          G.C. IV, Interim Resolution DH(98)342

H46-            44441          G.C. VII, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H32-            36605          G.C.VI, Interim Resolution DH(99)158

H32-            34236          G.D. II, Interim Resolution DH(98)236

H46-            44522          G.F. and others, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H32-            31645          G.F. II, Interim Resolution DH(97)629

H32-            27960          G.F.I, Interim Resolution DH(97)140

H32-            30598          G.G. III, Interim Resolution DH(97)533

H32-            29660          G.G.II, Interim Resolution DH(97)433

H32-            26016          G.I., Interim Resolution DH(96)495

H32-            24315          G.L. I, Interim Resolution DH(96)173

H32-            30585          G.L. II, Interim Resolution DH(97)534

H46-            51666          G.L., judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02

H32-            40614          G.L.S., Interim Resolution DH(99)599

H32-            25247          G.M. IV, Interim Resolution DH(96)174

H32-            27183          G.M. V, Interim Resolution DH(97)33

H32-            31351          G.M. VI, Interim Resolution DH(97)630

H32-            35330          G.M. VII, Interim Resolution DH(98)415

H32-            25266          G.M.N., Interim Resolution DH(96)175

H32-            31357          G.P. and F.C., Interim Resolution DH(97)631

H32-            33794          G.P. IV, Interim Resolution DH(98)171

H32-            38123          G.P.F. and M.V. II, Interim Resolution DH(99)289

H32-            27954          G.P.M., Interim Resolution DH(97)135

H32-            32287          G.R. and P.M., Interim Resolution DH(98)41

H32-            23300          G.R. and S.D., Interim Resolution DH(97)535

H32-            23480          G.R. II

H32-            26447          G.S. III, Interim Resolution DH(96)535

H32-            27180          G.S. IV, Interim Resolution DH(97)34

H32-            29658          G.S. V, Interim Resolution DH(97)434

H32-            32281          G.S. VI, Interim Resolution DH(98)172

H32-            35312          G.S. VII, Interim Resolution DH(99)600

H32-            29670          G.V. I, Interim Resolution DH(97)435

H32-            32279          G.V. II, Interim Resolution DH(98)27

H32-            35341          G.V. III, Interim Resolution DH(98)416

H32-            38506          G.V. IV, Interim Resolution DH(99)389

H32-            35315          Galazzi, Interim Resolution DH(98)417

H46-            39871          Galgani and De Matteis I, judgment of 28/09/00

H46-            44497          Galgani and de Matteis II, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H32-            26848          Galletti, Interim Resolution DH(96)628

H46-            46990          Gallo Carmelo, judgment of 16/01/01, final on 16/04/01

H32-            37163          Gambardella, Interim Resolution DH(99)160

Sub-Section 4.3

H32-            33800          Gambini and Macchia, Interim Resolution DH(98)173

H32-            26828          Garavaglia, Interim Resolution DH(97)63

H32-            27956+        Garberi P. E. and M., Interim Resolution DH(97)632

H32-            30091          Garufi, Interim Resolution DH(97)420

H46-            51648          Gaspari, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02

H32-            25225          Gasparoli, Interim Resolution DH(96)176

H32-            31646          Gasperoni, Interim Resolution DH(97)633

H32-            33140          Gatta, Interim Resolution DH(98)107

H32-            34242          Gatti, Interim Resolution DH(98)418

H46-            49304          Gatto, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02

H46-            45873          Gaudino, judgment of 07/11/00, final on 07/02/01

H32-            36636          Gavoncini Lenci A. and A. and Scanu, Interim Resolution DH(99)161

H32-            36614          Gennari, Interim Resolution DH(99)162

H32-            23422          Gentile Italo, Interim Resolution DH(96)536

H32-            19870          Gerace

H32-            40602          Geva S.a.s., Interim Resolution DH(99)601

H32-            36623          Ghedina, Interim Resolution DH(99)163

H46-            38116          Ghilino, judgment of 02/11/99

H32-            30590          Ghirardi, Interim Resolution DH(97)536

H32-            26019          Ghiron, Interim Resolution DH(96)496

H32-            35266          Giacomon, Interim Resolution DH(99)68

H32-            28733          Giambrone, Interim Resolution DH(97)249

H32-            35908          Giampietri, Interim Resolution DH(99)69

H46-            40942          Gianetti and De Lisi, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00

H32-            25245          Giardinieri, Interim Resolution DH(96)177

H46-            45888          Giarratana, judgment of 07/11/00, final on 07/02/01

H46-            45109          Gibertini, judgment of 12/10/00, final on 12/01/01

H32-            33789          Gigante E. and N., Interim Resolution DH(98)192

H32-            35916          Gilio Benito, Interim Resolution DH(99)70

H46-            53361          Giomi, judgment of 05/10/00, final on 05/01/01

H32-            24322          Giorgi Alberti, Interim Resolution DH(95)417

H46-            40930          Giorgio, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00

H32-            22572          Giovanelli and Vicentini

H46-            46531          Giovannangeli, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01

H32-            21340          Giovannetti

H32-            18924          Giovannetti Graziani

H32-            32283          Giraldi Francesco, Interim Resolution DH(98)28

H32-            32294          Giraldi Germana, Interim Resolution DH(98)29

H32-            29141          Giraldi I, Interim Resolution DH(97)310

H32-            27475          Giusti I, Interim Resolution DH(97)64

H32-            32297          Giusti II, Interim Resolution DH(98)30

H32-            26838          Giusto, Interim Resolution DH(96)629

H46-            40941          Glebe Visconti, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00

H32-            24542          Godet, Interim Resolution DH(96)230

H32-            33791          Golia Angelo, Interim Resolution DH(98)174

H32-            23431          Gracci, Interim Resolution DH(96)231

H32-            38486          Graizzaro, Interim Resolution DH(99)390

H32-            30092          Granatelli, Interim Resolution DH(97)449

H32-            21671          Granatiero Rosa and Raffaella

H32-            27963          Grande and others, Interim Resolution DH(97)181

H46-            45110          Grappio, judgment of 12/10/00, final on 12/01/01

H46-            44430          Grassi, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02

H46-            45886          Gratteri, judgment of 07/11/00, final on 07/02/01

H32-            27467          Gravagno Francesca, Interim Resolution DH(97)65

Sub-Section 4.3

H46-            44512          Greco, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02

H32-            39151          Greppi, Interim Resolution DH(99)496

H32-            26408          Grignano, Interim Resolution DH(96)649

H32-            35907          Grilli, Interim Resolution DH(99)71

H46-            49308          Grimaldi, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02

H32-            26020          Grio, Interim Resolution DH(96)497

H32-            38511          Gris, Interim Resolution DH(99)391

H46-            49303          Grisi, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02

H32-            27986          Gualtieri, Interim Resolution DH(97)160

H46-            49321          Guarnieri, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02

H32-            24782          Gubitosi, Interim Resolution DH(96)51

H46-            52975          Gucci, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02, revised judgment of 01/10/2002,

                                      final on 01/01/2003[190]

H46-            44403          Guerrera I, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H46-            44423          Guerrera II, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H32-            33144          Guetti G., G. and G., Interim Resolution DH(98)108

H46-            45896          Guidi, judgment of 07/11/00, final on 07/02/01

H32-            31639          Gurciullo and Cappello, Interim Resolution DH(97)634

H46-            44502          Gusso and Grasso, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02

H32-            30109          Hay, Interim Resolution DH(97)450

H32-            22974          I. S. and M.A.T. I, Interim Resolution DH(96)178

H32-            29157          I. S. II, Interim Resolution DH(97)311

H32-            34839          I. S. III, Interim Resolution DH(98)343

H46-            40957          I., judgment of 14/12/99, final on 14/03/00

H32-            36606          I.S. and M.A.T. II, Interim Resolution DH(99)165

H32-            35336          I.S. IV, Interim Resolution DH(98)419

H32-            37158          I.S. V, Interim Resolution DH(99)164

H32-            29126          Iaconetta, Interim Resolution DH(97)312

H46-            44530          Iacovelli, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H46-            40973          Iadanza, judgment of 14/12/99, final on 14/03/00

H46-            45885          Iannelli, judgment of 07/11/00, final on 07/02/01

H46-            49359          Iannetti, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H32-            30580          Ianni Domenico I, Interim Resolution DH(97)537

H32-            35295          Ianni Domenico II, Interim Resolution DH(98)420

H46-            46986          Ianni III, judgment of 16/01/01, final on 16/04/01

H46-            44514          Iezzi and Cerritelli, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02

H46-            45876          Il Messaggero S.a.s. I, judgment of 07/11/00, final on 07/02/01

H32-            39154          “Il quadrifoglio" calzature-pelletteria di Maria Enrica Colombo S.a.s.,

                                      Interim Resolution DH(99)497

H32-            34270          Immobiliare Li.ma. s.a.s., Interim Resolution DH(98)238

H32-            26853          Immobiliare San Teodoro s.r.l., Interim Resolution DH(96)631

H32-            34861          Imparato Francesco, Interim Resolution DH(98)344

H32-            29156          Inches, Interim Resolution DH(97)313

H32-            28728          Inteco S.r.l., Interim Resolution DH(97)250

H32-            33786          Iorillo Antonio, Interim Resolution DH(98)175

H46-            45875          Iorillo Debora, judgment of 16/01/01, final on 16/04/01

H32-            35291          L. P., Ga. C. and Gi. C., Interim Resolution DH(98)421

H46-            44515          L., judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02

H32-            26018          L.C. II, Interim Resolution DH(96)498

H32-            26040          L.C. III, Interim Resolution DH(96)650

Sub-Section 4.3

H32-            24024          L.D.C., Interim Resolution DH(95)284

H32-            35922          L.D.T., Interim Resolution DH(99)72

H32-            27973          L.F. IV, Interim Resolution DH(97)149

H32-            30088          L.F. V, Interim Resolution DH(97)451

H32-            36646          L.G. II, Interim Resolution DH(99)166

H32-            40575          L.G. IV, Interim Resolution DH(99)602

H46-            39487          L.G.S. S.p.a. II, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 06/09/01

H46-            40980          L.G.S. S.p.a., judgment of 05/04/00, final on 05/07/00

H32-            31354          L.L., C.S. and S.M., Interim Resolution DH(97)635

H32-            24825          L.M. V, Interim Resolution DH(96)474

H32-            32276          L.M. VI, Interim Resolution DH(98)31

H32-            36633          L.M.L., Interim Resolution DH(99)167

H32-            30576          L.P. I, Interim Resolution DH(97)538

H32-            36631          L.P. II, Interim Resolution DH(99)168

H32-            31329          L.R. B., Interim Resolution DH(97)636

H32-            27958          L.S. and T.R., Interim Resolution DH(97)138

H32-            26423          L.U., Interim Resolution DH(96)537

H32-            18664          La Ferrara and others

H32-            34853          La Gorga, Interim Resolution DH(98)422

H32-            33788          La Mantia, Interim Resolution DH(98)176

H32-            34845          La Monica, Interim Resolution DH(98)345

H32-            13570          La Porta

H32-            39152          La Rosa, Interim Resolution DH(99)498

H32-            38100          La Torre, Interim Resolution DH(99)290

H32-            28731          Labate A., G., S. and B., Interim Resolution DH(97)251

H46-            44520          Lagana, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02

H46-            33158          Laino, judgment of 18/02/99

H32-            19832          Lanzo

H32-            35919          Larotonda I, Interim Resolution DH(99)73

H32-            35920          Larotonda II, Interim Resolution DH(99)392

H32-            39866          Lasagna and Milandri I, Interim Resolution DH(99)603

H32-            39867          Lasagna and Milandri II, Interim Resolution DH(99)604

H32-            25237          Latella, Interim Resolution DH(96)232

H32-            26038          Laterza, Interim Resolution DH(96)499

H32-            39144          Lazzari M. and C. and F., Interim Resolution DH(99)499

H32-            26844          Lazzarini, Interim Resolution DH(96)632

H32-            28726          Lealini, Interim Resolution DH(97)252

H32-            23604          Legge Massimo and Liberato, Interim Resolution DH(97)101

H32-            28721          Lelli G., L. and L., Interim Resolution DH(97)555

H32-            39158          Lenza, Di Stefano and Mancini, Interim Resolution DH(99)500

H32-            37171          Leo, Interim Resolution DH(99)169

H32-            39897          Leone Prefabbricati S.r.l., Interim Resolution DH(99)605

H32-            27188          Lepore Armando I, Interim Resolution DH(97)35

H32-            27993          Lepore Armando II, Interim Resolution DH(97)161

H32-            29128          Li Donni, Interim Resolution DH(97)314

H46-            44394          Liberatore, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H32-            35331          Liberi, Interim Resolution DH(98)423

H46-            40950          Liddo and Batteta, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00

H46-            49376          Lilla Santilli, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H32-            31327          Lilloni, Interim Resolution DH(97)638

H32-            34835          Limardi, Interim Resolution DH(98)346

H32-            35930          Lipari, Interim Resolution DH(99)74

H46-            45055          Lippera Zaniboni, judgment of 17/10/00, final on 17/01/01

H32-            38122          Lispi, Interim Resolution DH(99)291

Sub-Section 4.3

H32-            29167          Litardi, Interim Resolution DH(97)315

H32-            34860          Liut, Interim Resolution DH(98)347

H32-            35915          Lodi and Delmonte, Interim Resolution DH(99)75

H32-            25239          Lombardi Satriani I, Interim Resolution DH(96)180

H32-            26008          Lombardi Satriani II, Interim Resolution DH(96)500

H32-            34831          Lombardi Satriani III, Interim Resolution DH(98)320

H32-            35273          Lombardi Satriani IV, Interim Resolution DH(98)424

H32-            38132          Losardo, Interim Resolution DH(99)292

H32-            33842          Lucarini Maria Clementina II, Interim Resolution DH(99)393

H32-            27865          Lunari, Interim Resolution DH(97)253

H32-            39122          Lupi Giovanni II, Interim Resolution DH(99)501

H32-            25244          Luzi, Interim Resolution DH(96)181

H32-            38126          M. and G.P., Interim Resolution DH(99)502

H32-            33133          M. G., Interim Resolution DH(98)110

H46-            40940          M. I, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00

H46-            40931          M. II, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00

H32-            33154          M., G.F. and A.T., Interim Resolution DH(98)109

H32-            27953          M.A.D.F., Interim Resolution DH(97)134

H46-            45893          M.A.I.E. S.n.c., judgment of 07/11/00, final on 06/04/01

H32-            26000          M.C. C., Interim Resolution DH(96)651

H32-            24797          M.C. III, Interim Resolution DH(96)53

H32-            39135          M.C. IX, Interim Resolution DH(99)503

H32-            26833          M.C. V, Interim Resolution DH(96)662

H32-            34263          M.C. VI, Interim Resolution DH(98)239

H32-            37141          M.C. VII, Interim Resolution DH(99)170

H46-            38478          M.C. VIII, judgment of 09/11/99

H32-            18253          M.C., A.C., A.N.C., G.S. and E.S.

H32-            25228          M.D.M., Interim Resolution DH(96)182

H32-            34873          M.F. C., Interim Resolution DH(98)348

H32-            38525          M.G. II, Interim Resolution DH(99)394

H46-            49305          M.I. and E.I., judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02

H32-            31647          M.L. D.R., Interim Resolution DH(97)639

H32-            25231          M.L. II, Interim Resolution DH(96)183

H32-            31353          M.M. II, Interim Resolution DH(97)640

H46-            46985          M.Q., judgment of 16/01/01, final on 16/04/01

H32-            35943          M.R. I, Interim Resolution DH(99)100

H32-            38496          M.R.G. and E.F., Interim Resolution DH(99)395

H32-            26006          M.R.V., Interim Resolution DH(96)501

H32-            35934          M.S. and F.B., Interim Resolution DH(99)76

H32-            40578          M.S.A., Interim Resolution DH(99)607

H32-            27168          M.T. II, Interim Resolution DH(97)36

H32-            34252          M.T.P., Interim Resolution DH(98)240

H32-            32302          M.V., Interim Resolution DH(98)32

H32-            37133          M.V.F. and M.O.M., Interim Resolution DH(99)171

H32-            27169          M.Z., Interim Resolution DH(97)77

H32-            26028          Ma. C., Interim Resolution DH(96)652

H32-            25214          MA.RI.OR. S.a.s., Interim Resolution DH(96)184

H32-            37159          Maccà Amelia I, Interim Resolution DH(99)172

H32-            38110          Maccà Amelia II, Interim Resolution DH(99)293

H46-            44464          Maccari Ada, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H32-            39877          Macelloni, Interim Resolution DH(99)608

H32-            29663          Maffeo and Papa, Interim Resolution DH(97)548

H32-            27965          Maggi and Arcangeloni, Interim Resolution DH(97)143

Sub-Section 4.3

H32-            39896          Maggioni and Rota, Interim Resolution DH(99)609

H32-            25263          Maggiore, Interim Resolution DH(96)185

H32-            35903          Magnano and Anselmo, Interim Resolution DH(99)77

H32-            35932          Magnante Trecco, Interim Resolution DH(99)78

H32-            34280          Magnaterra, Interim Resolution DH(98)241

H32-            27184          Magni, Interim Resolution DH(97)37

H32-            26007          Magno Di Gaspare, Interim Resolution DH(96)502

H32-            26859          Magri, Interim Resolution DH(96)633

H32-            34275+        Maiorano G, C., and M. and Serafini, Interim Resolution DH(98)242

H32-            24822          Majani S.p.a., Interim Resolution DH(96)113

H32-            25221          Maldini and Garulli G. B. and M., Interim Resolution DH(96)233

H32-            21076          Malvaso Maria Concetta and Carmela

H32-            20012          Malvaso Rocco

H32-            24332          Manca Antonio Gavina, Interim Resolution DH(95)425

H32-            31636          Manca Marisa, Interim Resolution DH(97)641

H46-            40938          Manca Renata and Maria, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00

H46-            46994          Mancinelli, judgment of 16/01/01, final on 16/04/01

H32-            34248          Mandelli, Interim Resolution DH(98)243

H32-            38104          Manieri, Interim Resolution DH(99)294

H32-            34241          Manni Salvatore, Interim Resolution DH(98)244

H32-            29132          Manni, Interim Resolution DH(97)371

H32-            31350          Manotti, Interim Resolution DH(97)642

H32-            35314          Mansueto, Interim Resolution DH(98)425

H46-            44498          Mantini II, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H32-            29154          Manzinali, Interim Resolution DH(97)316

H46-            49370          Marcantoni, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H32-            28734          Marcellino, Interim Resolution DH(97)256

H32-            32278          Marcello, Interim Resolution DH(98)33

H32-            33142          Marchese Carlo, Interim Resolution DH(98)111

H32-            26403          Marchetti Alessandro I, Interim Resolution DH(96)653

H32-            25882          Marchetti Alessandro II, Interim Resolution DH(97)102

H32-            37156          Marè, Interim Resolution DH(99)208

H46-            45063          Mari I, judgment of 17/10/00, final on 17/01/01

H46-            49365          Mari II, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H32-            38481          Marinelli and C.S.n.c. I, Interim Resolution DH(99)610

H32-            38514          Marinelli and C.S.n.c. II, Interim Resolution DH(99)611

H32-            38515          Marinelli and C.S.n.c. III, Interim Resolution DH(99)612

H32-            35335          Marinelli Guiseppe, Interim Resolution DH(98)426

H46-            49364          Marinelli Lucia, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H32-            33781          Marino Liliana, Interim Resolution DH(98)177

H32-            26005          Marino Ruggiero, Interim Resolution DH(96)503

H32-            37139          Marletta, Interim Resolution DH(99)173

H32-            25250          Marolda, Interim Resolution DH(96)186

H32-            29656          Martelli and Straccia, Interim Resolution DH(97)436

H46-            47784          Martinetti and others, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H32-            32298          Martino, Interim Resolution DH(98)34

H46-            44496          Masala, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H46-            40972          Masi, judgment of 14/12/99, final on 14/03/00

H32-            37185          Massa, Interim Resolution DH(99)174

H32-            34849          Mastrocinque Giovanni, Interim Resolution DH(98)321

H32-            27453          Matarrese and Di Masi, Interim Resolution DH(97)66

H32-            39141          Matera, Interim Resolution DH(99)504

H32-            35931          Matteoni O. F. A. and R., Interim Resolution DH(99)79

H46-            44391          Mauti, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02

Sub-Section 4.3

H32-            27187          Mazzà Giuseppe and others, Interim Resolution DH(97)38

H32-            26044          Mazzacuva, Interim Resolution DH(96)504

H32-            34828          Mazzella, Interim Resolution DH(98)322

H32-            33779          Mazzi, Interim Resolution DH(98)178

H32-            31328          Mazziotti, Interim Resolution DH(97)643

H46-            51655          Mazzoleni and others, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02

H32-            29142          Mazzoli and 8 others, Interim Resolution DH(97)317

H32-            26417          Mazzone, Interim Resolution DH(96)538

H32-            26254          Medzihradszky, Interim Resolution DH(98)112

H32-            24798          Meistro and Santin, Interim Resolution DH(96)475

H46-            44438          Mel Sud S.R.L., judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H32-            35917          Melchionna, Interim Resolution DH(99)80

H32-            26857          Meloni S.p.a., Interim Resolution DH(96)634

H32-            24789          Meluso Angelo I, Interim Resolution DH(96)66

H32-            26416          Meluso Angelo II, Interim Resolution DH(96)539

H32-            38471          Meluso Angelo III, Interim Resolution DH(99)396

H32-            38472          Meluso Angelo IV, Interim Resolution DH(99)397

H32-            35288          Mengano and Morini, Interim Resolution DH(98)427

H32-            34269          Mercandino, Interim Resolution DH(98)245

H32-            30578          Merlanti, Interim Resolution DH(97)539

H32-            26419          Merra, Interim Resolution DH(96)540

H32-            37168          Messina Giuseppe I, Interim Resolution DH(99)175

H32-            40574          Messina Giuseppe II, Interim Resolution DH(99)613

H32-            29146          Mezzatesta, Interim Resolution DH(97)318

H46-            49311          Mezzena, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02

H46-            51654          Mezzetta, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02

H32-            33796          Micanzi, Interim Resolution DH(98)179

H32-            38130          Michieli and Gentilini, Interim Resolution DH(99)295

H32-            34847          Milani, Interim Resolution DH(98)428

H32-            33798          Milano, Interim Resolution DH(98)180

H32-            35906          Milazzo, Interim Resolution DH(99)81

H46-            48403          Minici, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02

H32-            32280          Minnai, Interim Resolution DH(98)35

H32-            33163          Minniti and Lucianò, Interim Resolution DH(98)113

H32-            25218          Minotti, Interim Resolution DH(96)187

H46-            45098          Miola, judgment of 12/10/00, final on 12/01/01

H46-            46540          MMB S.N.C. and Beloli, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01

H32-            36612          Mobilio, Interim Resolution DH(99)176

H32-            36609          Molari, Interim Resolution DH(99)177

H46-            48417          Mole, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02

H46-            51652          Molek, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02

H46-            51650          Molinaris, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02

H32-            34250          Monaco Maria, Interim Resolution DH(98)246

H32-            35909          Monorchio, Interim Resolution DH(99)82

H32-            39885          Montanari, Interim Resolution DH(99)614

H32-            32282          Monti, Interim Resolution DH(98)247

H32-            38492          Monticelli, Interim Resolution DH(99)398

H46-            49354          Morelli and Levantesi, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H32-            39120          Morelli F. and G., Interim Resolution DH(99)505

H46-            45066          Morena, judgment of 27/07/00, final on 27/10/00

H46-            48413          Morese II, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02

H46-            40932          Morese, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00

H46-            45067          Moretti, judgment of 27/07/00, final on 27/10/00

H32-            26428          Moroni, Interim Resolution DH(96)542

Sub-Section 4.3

H32-            37138          Morra, Interim Resolution DH(99)178

H32-            34267          Morticella, Interim Resolution DH(98)248

H32-            39143          Moscarelli, Interim Resolution DH(99)506

H32-            36641          Mostosi, Interim Resolution DH(99)179

H32-            36656          Motta Umberto S.R.L., Interim Resolution DH(99)180

H32-            35293          Mucciola and Bottino, Interim Resolution DH(98)429

H32-            37153          Mugnaini Brandani, Interim Resolution DH(99)236

H46-            46514          Murru I, judgment of 21/11/00, final on 21/02/01

H46-            45091          Murru II, judgment of 21/12/00, final on 21/03/01

H46-            45095          Murru III, judgment of 21/12/00, final on 21/03/01

H46-            44386          Murru IV, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02

H32-            34846          Musci, Interim Resolution DH(98)323

H32-            26002          Muso Aurelio I, Interim Resolution DH(96)505

H32-            30087          Muso Rosina, Interim Resolution DH(97)452

H46-            44507          Musti and Iarossi, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H32-            39868          N.M. and A.M., Interim Resolution DH(99)615

H32-            35329          N.Z., Interim Resolution DH(98)430

H32-            20043          Napoli and Mammoliti

H32-            27970          Nardelli, Interim Resolution DH(97)147

H32-            29661          Nardone Angelo I, Interim Resolution DH(97)438

H32-            37173          Nardone Angelo II, Interim Resolution DH(99)181

H32-            29667          Nardone Antonio, Interim Resolution DH(97)437

H46-            40949          Nardone Ennio and Antonella, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00

H32-            27972          Naselli, Interim Resolution DH(97)148

H32-            39878          Nasto, Interim Resolution DH(99)616

H32-            38147          Nati II, Interim Resolution DH(99)296

H32-            33780          Nati, Interim Resolution DH(98)181

H32-            34277          Nazzaro, Interim Resolution DH(98)249

H32-            38500          Nembrini Gonzaga, Interim Resolution DH(99)399

H32-            38124          Novello, Interim Resolution DH(99)297

H46-            45072          Novotny, judgment of 27/07/00, final on 27/10/00

H32-            29646          O. S.a.s., Interim Resolution DH(97)439

H32-            38108          O.B. I, Interim Resolution DH(99)298

H46-            44506          O.B. II, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H32-            29657          O.C., Interim Resolution DH(97)440

H46-            51698          O.M., judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02

H32-            26837          O.O., Interim Resolution DH(96)635

H46-            49320          Onori, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02

H32-            38473          Orelli, Interim Resolution DH(99)400

H32-            27463          Orlando and Fiorentino, Interim Resolution DH(97)67

H32-            35905          Orlando, Interim Resolution DH(99)101

H32-            36622          Orlandoni and Lapis, Interim Resolution DH(99)182

H32-            25232          Ottelli, Interim Resolution DH(96)476

H32-            26861          Ozimo and Lamanna, Interim Resolution DH(96)636

H46-            51692          P. and M.O., judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02

H32-            34858          P. T. I, Interim Resolution DH(98)349

H32-            39864          P., M.R. and C.E., Interim Resolution DH(99)618

H32-            37144          P.A. I, Interim Resolution DH(99)209

H32-            37145          P.A. II, Interim Resolution DH(99)183

H32-            37146          P.A. III, Interim Resolution DH(99)184

H32-            26441          P.B. IV, Interim Resolution DH(96)543

H32-            27161          P.C. and F.Z., Interim Resolution DH(97)40

H32-            27976          P.C. II, Interim Resolution DH(97)151

H32-            39162          P.C. III, Interim Resolution DH(99)507

Sub-Section 4.3

H32-            38140          P.D.B, Interim Resolution DH(99)299

H46-            47000          P.I., judgment of 16/01/01, final on 16/04/01

H32-            14140          P.P. I

H32-            27460          P.P.II, Interim Resolution DH(97)68

H32-            25258          P.U. I, Interim Resolution DH(96)188

H32-            25259          P.U. II, Interim Resolution DH(96)189

H32-            25260          P.U. III, Interim Resolution DH(96)190

H32-            40568          Padalino R., C., and M.R., Interim Resolution DH(99)619

H46-            35994          Paderni I, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 29/06/00

H32-            24334          Pala, Interim Resolution DH(95)428

H32-            36637          Paladini, Interim Resolution DH(99)185

H32-            28723          Pallotti, Interim Resolution DH(97)255

H32-            38127          Palmisano, Interim Resolution DH(99)312

H46-            49310          Palumbo, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02

H32-            40565          Panarari and Turani, Interim Resolution DH(99)620

H32-            30579          Panella Bruno I, Interim Resolution DH(97)540

H32-            31349          Panella Bruno II, Interim Resolution DH(97)644

H32-            35302          Panozzo, Interim Resolution DH(98)431

H32-            32295          Pansa, Interim Resolution DH(98)36

H46-            46991          Paolelli I, judgment of 16/01/01, final on 16/04/01

H46-            44463          Paolelli II, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H32-            26033          Paolillo and Morini, Interim Resolution DH(96)506

H32-            40573          Paradiso Giorgio, Interim Resolution DH(99)621

H32-            24331          Parisi, Interim Resolution DH(95)429

H32-            25219          Parodi, Interim Resolution DH(96)191

H32-            40585          Pasinetti, Interim Resolution DH(99)622

H32-            34274          Pasquali Zanotti, Interim Resolution DH(98)258

H46-            45101          Pasquetti, judgment of 12/10/00, final on 12/01/01

H32-            28056          Pasquino, Interim Resolution DH(97)645

H32-            27160          Passarella, Interim Resolution DH(97)41

H32-            38096          Passerini I, Interim Resolution DH(99)300

H32-            38097          Passerini II, Interim Resolution DH(99)301

H32-            39125          Pasta, Interim Resolution DH(99)508

H46-            51657          Pastrello, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02

H32-            30095          Patelli and Pesenti, Interim Resolution DH(97)666

H32-            29169          Patrizi I, Interim Resolution DH(97)326

H32-            34833          Patteri, Interim Resolution DH(98)432

H46-            49396          Peda, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02

H46-            51700          Pelagagge, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02

H32-            35338          Pellegrini Odilia, Interim Resolution DH(98)433

H32-            38489          Pepe, Interim Resolution DH(99)401

H32-            29664          Pepiciello, Interim Resolution DH(97)441

H32-            31337          Peresson, Interim Resolution DH(97)646

H46-            51699          Perico, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02

H32-            24047          Perini, Interim Resolution DH(95)293

H46-            45894          Pernici and D'Ercole, judgment of 07/11/00, final on 07/02/01

H32-            25267          Perrone, Interim Resolution DH(96)192

H32-            29160          Pesaresi and 8 others, Interim Resolution DH(97)319

H32-            33147          Pesarin, Interim Resolution DH(98)114

H46-            40923          Petix, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00

H32-            25246          Petromilli, Interim Resolution DH(96)193

H32-            29137          Pettinelli, Interim Resolution DH(97)320

H32-            25248          Pezzati, Interim Resolution DH(96)194

H32-            30592          Pezzilli, Interim Resolution DH(97)541

Sub-Section 4.3

H32-            34278          Pezzini, Interim Resolution DH(98)250

H32-            31644          Pia, Interim Resolution DH(97)647

H32-            29162          Piazzalunga II, Interim Resolution DH(97)321

H46-            51697          Piccinin, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02

H32-            26031          Piccinini I, Interim Resolution DH(96)654

H32-            33167          Piccininno, Interim Resolution DH(98)182

H46-            45878          Piccirillo Angela, judgment of 07/11/00, final on 07/02/01

H46-            47003          Piccoli, judgment of 16/01/01, final on 16/04/01

H32-            29655          Piccolo, Interim Resolution DH(97)442

H32-            35942          Picconi and Puggioni, Interim Resolution DH(98)434

H32-            31642          Pierfederici, Interim Resolution DH(97)648

H32-            29140          Pierucci, Interim Resolution DH(98)115

H32-            34862          Pioli, Interim Resolution DH(98)350

H32-            35283          Piscopo and 5 others, Interim Resolution DH(98)435

H46-            45874          Pittoni, judgment of 07/11/00, final on 07/02/01

H46-            51665          Plebani, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02

H32-            26445          Poddighe and others, Interim Resolution DH(96)544

H32-            35901          Poli, Interim Resolution DH(99)83

H32-            34834          Polidoro, Interim Resolution DH(98)351

H32-            35317          Poligamma s.n.c., Interim Resolution DH(98)436

H32-            24794          Polperio and 7 others I, Interim Resolution DH(96)71

H32-            24795          Polperio and 7 others II, Interim Resolution DH(96)72

H46-            44499          Pomante Pappalepore, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H32-            37164          Poppi, Interim Resolution DH(99)237

H46-            44454          Porcelli, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H32-            30584          Porfilio, Interim Resolution DH(97)542

H46-            40967          Privitera, judgment of 14/12/99, final on 14/03/00

H32-            27955          Proietti Valeri, Interim Resolution DH(97)136

H32-            37593          Provide S.r.l. I, Interim Resolution DH(99)624

H32-            40621          Provide s.r.l. II, Interim Resolution DH(99)625

H46-            49312          Provide S.R.L., judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02

H32-            13545          Provinzano

H32-            20235          Pucchielli

H32-            20208          Pucci

H32-            35911          Pucci and Veschi, Interim Resolution DH(99)84

H32-            27447          Puglia, Interim Resolution DH(97)69

H32-            25254          Pugliani and Cianca, Interim Resolution DH(96)195

H32-            39893          Quattrone Francesco, Interim Resolution DH(99)626

H46-            40927          R. I, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00

H46-            40964          R. II, judgment of 14/12/99, final on 14/03/00

H32-            26440          R.D., Interim Resolution DH(96)545

H32-            33156          R.L.P., Interim Resolution DH(98)183

H32-            30090          R.M. IV, Interim Resolution DH(97)453

H46-            44526          R.P. and others, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02

H32-            24807          R.P. I, Interim Resolution DH(96)73

H32-            36626          R.P. II, Interim Resolution DH(99)210

H32-            34245          R.R., Interim Resolution DH(98)251

H32-            36602          R.S.p.A., Interim Resolution DH(99)186

H32-            26425          R.V. II, Interim Resolution DH(96)546

H46-            44381          Raffa, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H32-            26046          Raffi Giuliano I, Interim Resolution DH(96)507

H32-            26841          Raffi Giuliano II, Interim Resolution DH(96)637

H32-            35939          Ragnolini, Interim Resolution DH(99)85

H32-            27171          Ragusi, Bordandini, Pattuelli and Vidimian, Interim Resolution DH(97)42

Sub-Section 4.3

H32-            27162          Ranucci, Interim Resolution DH(97)103

H32-            19222          Rapotez

H32-            38495          Ravanelli, Interim Resolution DH(99)510

H46-            46984          Ravignani, judgment of 16/01/01, final on 16/04/01

H32-            35289          Redaelli Tecna S.p.a., Interim Resolution DH(98)437

H32-            26014          Reinaudo, Interim Resolution DH(96)509

H32-            26847          Reni, Interim Resolution DH(96)638

H32-            36652          Reniero, Interim Resolution DH(99)238

H32-            26001          Ricchiuto, Interim Resolution DH(96)510

H32-            38483          Ricci Maria Annina, Interim Resolution DH(99)402

H32-            35327          Ricci Riccardo, Interim Resolution DH(98)438

H46-            46988          Ricci Silvia, judgment of 16/01/01, final on 16/04/01

H32-            26030          Riccioni, Interim Resolution DH(96)511

H32-            36617          Rico Giovanni I, Interim Resolution DH(99)187

H32-            36618          Rico Giovanni II, Interim Resolution DH(99)188

H32-            17049          Righetti

H32-            25256          Ristoro G., A. and A., Interim Resolution DH(96)196

H46-            49357          Rizio, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H32-            26404          Rizza, Interim Resolution DH(96)547

H32-            27983          Rizzo M. R. and G. and De Martino, Interim Resolution DH(97)157

H32-            38477          Rizzo, Interim Resolution DH(99)403

H32-            39892          Roberto R., M-L., C., and F., and Tudisco, Interim Resolution DH(99)627

H46-            51659          Roccatagliata, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02

H32-            31345          Rocchi Almerico, Interim Resolution DH(97)649

H46-            45887          Roma, judgment of 07/11/00, final on 07/02/01

H32-            26437          Romagnoli, Interim Resolution DH(96)548

H32-            33510          Romaniello G. and A., Interim Resolution DH(98)266

H32-            30089          Romaniello, Interim Resolution DH(97)454

H32-            38106          Romei, Interim Resolution DH(99)302

H32-            40572          Rondinone, Interim Resolution DH(99)628

H46-            44531          Rongoni, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H46-            40948          Ronzulli, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00

H46-            49361          Rosa Antonio, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H32-            36643          Rosa Elisabetta, Interim Resolution DH(99)189

H32-            34874          Roselli Italo I, Interim Resolution DH(98)439

H46-            38480          Roselli Italo III, judgment of 15/02/00

H32-            40598          Rossi Eufrasia, Interim Resolution DH(99)629

H32-            27971          Rossi Franca, Interim Resolution DH(97)171

H32-            34238          Rossi Romano, Interim Resolution DH(98)252

H32-            25236          Rotella and Zuccalà, Interim Resolution DH(96)197

H46-            46513          Rotiroti, judgment of 21/11/00, final on 21/02/01

H32-            27977          Ruggeri, Interim Resolution DH(97)152

H32-            27478          Rullo Tassone, Interim Resolution DH(97)70

H32-            33143          S. C. IV, Interim Resolution DH(98)116

H32-            27962          S. D.P., Interim Resolution DH(97)141

H46-            40934          S., judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00

H46-            40184          S.A.GE.MA S.n.c. II, judgment of 27/04/00, final on 27/07/00

H32-            24042          S.B., Interim Resolution DH(95)298

H32-            26042          S.C. II, Interim Resolution DH(97)78

H32-            26405          S.C. III, Interim Resolution DH(96)549

H32-            26407          S.D., Interim Resolution DH(96)550

H32-            39118          S.G., Interim Resolution DH(99)526

H32-            39148          S.I.E.L.P.A. S.r.l., Interim Resolution DH(99)511

H32-            34864          S.I.P.I. S.n.c., Interim Resolution DH(98)324

Sub-Section 4.3

H32-            38508          S.M., Interim Resolution DH(99)404

H32-            26414          S.P. and S.V., Interim Resolution DH(96)551

H46-            45061          S.S., judgment of 17/10/00, final on 17/01/01

H32-            24324          Sabia, Interim Resolution DH(95)441

H32-            25107          Sacchi, Interim Resolution DH(96)115

H32-            37169          Salamanca, Interim Resolution DH(99)190

H32-            38111          Salomone, Interim Resolution DH(99)303

H32-            36642          Saltari, Interim Resolution DH(99)240

H32-            30104          Salvatore I, Interim Resolution DH(97)455

H32-            30105          Salvatore II, Interim Resolution DH(97)456

H32-            30106          Salvatore III, Interim Resolution DH(97)457

H32-            30110          Salvatore IV, Interim Resolution DH(97)458

H32-            30111          Salvatore V, Interim Resolution DH(97)459

H32-            30112          Salvatore VI, Interim Resolution DH(97)460

H46-            40943          Salvatori and Gardin, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00

H46-            49360          Salvi, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 27/03/02

H46-            44404          Salzano, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 04/04/01

H32-            31340          Sambati, Interim Resolution DH(97)650

H32-            27174          Samir, Interim Resolution DH(97)43

H32-            35929          Santarcangelo, Interim Resolution DH(99)86

H32-            30588          Santella, Interim Resolution DH(97)543

H46-            45895          Santini, judgment of 07/11/00, final on 07/02/01

H32-            26034          Santonocito and others, Interim Resolution DH(96)512

H32-            32288          Sapuppo, Interim Resolution DH(98)37

H32-            35326          Sardo, Interim Resolution DH(98)441

H32-            40569          Sarti, Interim Resolution DH(99)630

H46-            45069          Sartori, judgment of 27/07/00, final on 27/10/00

H32-            30591          Sasso, Interim Resolution DH(97)544

H32-            38490          Saullo, Interim Resolution DH(99)405

H46-            49368          Savanna and La Selva, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H32-            33166          Savini and Malaspina, Interim Resolution DH(98)117

H46-            38479          Savona, judgment of 15/02/00

H32-            34237          Scagliola, Interim Resolution DH(98)253

H32-            24021          Scala, Interim Resolution DH(95)299

H46-            44489          Scannella Giuseppe, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02

H32-            33793          Scannella, Interim Resolution DH(98)184

H32-            35904          Scappaticci A.F. and A., and Ruzza, Interim Resolution DH(99)87

H46-            40929          Scarano, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00

H32-            30096          Scerra, Interim Resolution DH(97)461

H32-            24780          Schiavone, Interim Resolution DH(96)76

H46-            40623          Sciarrotta and Guarino, judgment of 05/04/00

H32-            32286          Scipioni, Mancini C.M., B.and D., Interim Resolution DH(98)38

H32-            24814          Scognamiglio II, Interim Resolution DH(96)116

H32-            38470          Scoppio, Interim Resolution DH(99)406

H32-            14578          Scotti II

H32-            26834          Scuderi Graziella, Interim Resolution DH(96)639

H46-            44467          Seminara, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H32-            38119          Serino Luigi, Interim Resolution DH(99)304

H46-            49306          Servillo and D'Ambrosio, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02

H46-            44402          Servodidio, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H32-            33151          Sestito, Sestito and Zaccone, Interim Resolution DH(98)118

H32-            37155          Severino, Interim Resolution DH(99)191

H32-            33787          Sferlazza, Interim Resolution DH(98)185

H32-            33148          Sgrò, Interim Resolution DH(98)119

Sub-Section 4.3

H32-            27984          Sgroi, Interim Resolution DH(97)158

H46-            40945          Siega and 7 others, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00

H32-            40577          Siena I, Interim Resolution DH(99)631

H46-            48415          Siena II, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02

H32-            26432          Siface, Interim Resolution DH(96)552

H32-            26825          Silvan S.p.a., Interim Resolution DH(96)640

H46-            44400          Silvestri, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02

H32-            27176          Simonetti (N.S.), Interim Resolution DH(97)39

H32-            30581          Simoni, Interim Resolution DH(97)545

H32-            26854          Simotti A, O. and M., Interim Resolution DH(96)641

H32-            26402          Siniscalchi and others, Interim Resolution DH(96)553

H46-            44493          Siper S.R.L., judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H32-            36604          Sirol Soc. Coop. a.r.l., Interim Resolution DH(99)192

H32-            25243          SO.CO.AB.S.r.l., Interim Resolution DH(97)291

H32-            35271          Società Sant'Andrea S.r.l., Interim Resolution DH(98)442

H32-            32289          Société Générale de Sucreries, Interim Resolution DH(98)39

H32-            34240          Somigli, Interim Resolution DH(98)254

H32-            33146          Sonego, Interim Resolution DH(98)120

H32-            39901          Sonzogno, Interim Resolution DH(99)632

H32-            34832          Sorace Carmelo, Interim Resolution DH(98)443

H32-            26004          Sorace Giuseppe I, Interim Resolution DH(96)513

H32-            38494          Sorace Giuseppe II, Interim Resolution DH(99)407

H32-            27468          Sorbo, Interim Resolution DH(97)168

H32-            25235          Sorrenti Alessandro II, Interim Resolution DH(96)198

H32-            35299          Spadon, Interim Resolution DH(98)444

H32-            27195          Spadoni Giacomo, Interim Resolution DH(97)44

H32-            38125          Spadoni Maurizio, Interim Resolution DH(99)305

H32-            39132          Spampani, Interim Resolution DH(99)512

H46-            46512          Sparano, judgment of 21/11/00, final on 21/02/01

H32-            34232          Sparti, Interim Resolution DH(98)267

H46-            44487          Spera II, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H32-            26839          Spiccia, Interim Resolution DH(96)642

H32-            36613          Spinato, Interim Resolution DH(99)193

H32-            29651          Spinosi, Interim Resolution DH(97)443

H32-            40618          Spitale, Interim Resolution DH(99)633

H32-            39873          Sportelli, Interim Resolution DH(99)634

H32-            37142          Squeo, Interim Resolution DH(99)194

H46-            44503          Squillante Gennaro, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02

H32-            39136          Squillante Pasquale, Interim Resolution DH(99)513

H32-            30586          Stacchiotti, Interim Resolution DH(97)651

H32-            35282          Statile, Interim Resolution DH(98)445

H46-            44518          Stefanini, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H32-            25229          Sterchele C. and C., Interim Resolution DH(96)199

H46-            47002          Storti, judgment of 16/01/01, final on 16/04/01

H32-            21507          Stringini, Interim Resolution DH(97)104

H32-            25252          Strongoli I, Interim Resolution DH(96)200

H32-            25253          Strongoli II, Interim Resolution DH(96)201

H46-            45056          Studio Tecnico AMU S.A.S., judgment of 17/10/00, final on 17/01/01

H32-            27173          Sud Ovest S.A.S., Interim Resolution DH(97)45

H32-            24039          T. s.r.l., Interim Resolution DH(95)302

H32-            37165          T.A.M., Interim Resolution DH(99)88

H32-            24040          T.M. and M.G.C., Interim Resolution DH(95)303

H32-            38521          T.M.A.2 S.r.l., Interim Resolution DH(99)408

H32-            35937          T.P. II, Interim Resolution DH(99)89

Sub-Section 4.3

H32-            24803          T.S.I. s.r.l., Interim Resolution DH(96)77

H32-            23566          T.-S.I., Interim Resolution DH(97)297

H32-            35298          Taddei, Interim Resolution DH(99)90

H32-            33661          Tagliavini, Interim Resolution DH(98)446

H32-            36610          Talarico, Interim Resolution DH(99)239

H46-            51656          Targi and Bianchi, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02

H46-            40933          Tarsia, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00

H32-            33165          Tartaglia I, Interim Resolution DH(98)121

H46-            48402          Tartaglia II, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02

H32-            13692          Tedesco I

H32-            13693          Tedesco II

H32-            40593          Tedesco Mario Felice, Interim Resolution DH(99)636

H46-            46508          Teofili, judgment of 21/11/00, final on 21/02/01

H32-            35913          Tesolin S.and F., Interim Resolution DH(99)91

H32-            30589          Tessadri, Interim Resolution DH(97)546

H32-            26436          Todesco Aldo, Interim Resolution DH(96)554

H32-            38468          Tommaselli C., A., M. V. and G., Interim Resolution DH(99)409

H46-            45862          Tor Di Valle Costruzioni S.p.a. I, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 04/04/01

H46-            45863          Tor Di Valle Costruzioni S.p.a. II, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 04/04/01

H46-            45864          Tor Di Valle Costruzioni S.p.a. III, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 04/04/01

H46-            45865          Tor Di Valle Costruzioni S.p.a. IV, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 04/04/01

H46-            45866          Tor Di Valle Costruzioni S.p.a. V, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 04/04/01

H46-            45867          Tor Di Valle Costruzioni S.p.a. VI, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 04/04/01

H46-            56100          Tor Di Valle Costruzioni S.p.a. VIII, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H32-            39123          Torregiani, Interim Resolution DH(99)514

H54-            26433          Torri, judgment of 01/07/97

H32-            39903          Torzo, Interim Resolution DH(99)637

H32-            39167          Tosone, Interim Resolution DH(99)515

H46-            45104          Trapani Francesco II, judgment of 12/10/00, final on 12/01/01

H32-            34265          Trapani, Interim Resolution DH(98)255

H46-            44439          Traspadini, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H32-            34856          Tripodi Giacinto, Interim Resolution DH(98)352

H46-            40946          Tripodi Giuseppe, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00, revised judgment of

                                      23/10/01, final on 23/01/02

H32-            27177          Tripodo M, C. and G. and Leonardo, Interim Resolution DH(97)46

H32-            34230          Trippa, Interim Resolution DH(98)256

H32-            38491          Triuzzi, Interim Resolution DH(99)410

H32-            34844          Trivellini, Interim Resolution DH(98)353

H32-            27961          Troccolo and Carrassi L. and C., Interim Resolution DH(97)172

H46-            44478          Troiani I, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H32-            31637          Troncato, Interim Resolution DH(98)40

H32-            38510          Tulli, Interim Resolution DH(99)411

H46-            45879          Turchini, judgment of 07/11/00, final on 07/02/01

H32-            36632          Turetta, Interim Resolution DH(99)195

H32-            35267          Tuso, Interim Resolution DH(98)447

H32-            26013          Uricchio, Interim Resolution DH(96)514

H32-            27198          V. and R.R., Interim Resolution DH(97)47

H32-            29168          V. L.S., Interim Resolution DH(97)322

H32-            36628          V.B. II, Interim Resolution DH(99)196

H32-            36634          V.D.P., Interim Resolution DH(99)197

H32-            31342          V.L., Interim Resolution DH(97)652

H32-            25234          V.M. I, Interim Resolution DH(96)202

H32-            29130          V.M. II, Interim Resolution DH(97)323

H32-            30216          V.N., Interim Resolution DH(97)653

Sub-Section 4.3

H32-            33155          V.P. and F.P., Interim Resolution DH(98)122

H32-            26401          V.R. I, Interim Resolution DH(96)655

H32-            30103          V.R. II, Interim Resolution DH(97)462

H32-            30101          Vaccari, Interim Resolution DH(97)463

H46-            46977          Vaccarisi, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01

H32-            23147          Vaggelli-Lupi, Interim Resolution DH(96)245

H46-            44459          Vairano, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H46-            49356          Valenti, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H32-            24793          Valentini, Interim Resolution DH(96)79

H46-            44398          Valentino, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H32-            38467          Valeri and Valeri and Rosa, Interim Resolution DH(99)412

H32-            37180          Valerio, Interim Resolution DH(99)198

H32-            34836          Valesani, Interim Resolution DH(98)354

H32-            27980          Valsecchi, Interim Resolution DH(97)155

H46-            44384          Valvo and Branca, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H32-            27455          Vannucchi, Interim Resolution DH(97)71

H32-            40584          Vardaro, Interim Resolution DH(99)638

H32-            25251          Varvaro, Interim Resolution DH(96)477

H32-            36607          Vasto, Interim Resolution DH(99)241

H32-            37172          Vattano, Interim Resolution DH(99)199

H32-            34253          Vedovato, Interim Resolution DH(98)257

H46-            44535          Venturini III, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H32-            33801          Verdelli, Interim Resolution DH(98)186

H32-            27166          Verini I, Interim Resolution DH(97)105

H46-            46982          Verini III, judgment of 16/01/01, final on 16/04/01

H46-            46983          Verini IV, judgment of 16/01/01, final on 16/04/01

H46-            46992          Verini V, judgment of 16/01/01, final on 16/04/01

H32-            16087          Vernillo

H32-            35948          Verza, Interim Resolution DH(99)92

H32-            25222          Vesentini, Interim Resolution DH(96)203

H32-            18011          Vicari G., R., and V.

H32-            36654          Vicari I, Interim Resolution DH(99)200

H32-            19835          Villani I

H46-            51663          Villanova, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02

H32-            35306          Vincenti Salvatore, Interim Resolution DH(98)448

H46-            40935          Vinci, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00

H32-            38501          Viola, Interim Resolution DH(99)413

H32-            29144          Vitali I, Interim Resolution DH(97)324

H32-            34875          Vitone, Interim Resolution DH(98)235

H32-            29164          Vivian, Interim Resolution DH(97)325

H46-            45064          Von Berger Icilio and Luciano, judgment of 17/10/00, final on 17/01/01

H32-            26850          Von Berger Icilio I, Interim Resolution DH(96)644

H32-            26851          Von Berger Icilio II, Interim Resolution DH(96)645

H32-            26852          Von Berger Icilio III, Interim Resolution DH(96)646

H32-            35926          Von Berger Luciano I, Interim Resolution DH(99)93

H32-            35927          Von Berger Luciano II, Interim Resolution DH(99)94

H32-            27471          W.B., Interim Resolution DH(97)72

H46-            45060          X200 S.R.L., judgment of 17/10/00, final on 17/01/01

H32-            39127          Zagato, Interim Resolution DH(99)516

H32-            23587          Zanelli

H32-            40606          Zanon and Lazzaro, Interim Resolution DH(99)640

H32-            27185          Zappavigna and Andriano, Interim Resolution DH(97)48

H32-            27966          Zarzana, Interim Resolution DH(97)144

H32-            34257          Zavatta I, Interim Resolution DH(98)259

Sub-Section 4.3

H32-            34259          Zavatta II, Interim Resolution DH(98)355

H32-            27175          Zilaghe and Dettori, Interim Resolution DH(97)49

H32-            27451          Zoccali, Interim Resolution DH(97)73

H32-            39133          Zoccola, Interim Resolution DH(99)517

H46-            45087          Zurzolo, judgment of 12/10/00, final on 12/01/01

                   - 7 cases concerning execution proceedings

H46-            40958          A.V. and A.B., judgment of  05/04/00, final on 05/07/00

H32-            34273          De Luca Antonio, Interim Resolution DH(98)233

H54-            15797          Di Pede, judgment of 26/09/96

H32-            35290          Finocchiaro, Interim Resolution DH(99)494

H46-            40969          Muso Aurelio II, judgment of 14/12/99, final on 14/03/00

H46-            40981          Muso Aurelio III, judgment of 05/04/00, final on 05/07/00

H54-            24295          Zappia, judgment of 26/09/96

                   - 62 cases before the administrative courts

H32-            29171          Abbate Giovanni, Interim Resolution DH(97)367

H54-            25587          Abenavoli, judgment of 02/09/97

H32-            26863          Almanno, Interim Resolution DH(96)611

H32-            25579          B.Q., Interim Resolution DH(96)213

H32-            26864          Bacci Roberto Maria, Interim Resolution DH(96)612

H32-            25585          Bagnoli and Mazzone G., A. and M., Interim Resolution DH(96)214

H32-            34878          Barcellona, Interim Resolution DH(99)202

H32-            35343          Bertozzi, Vorrasi, Ciarmoli and Forgione, Interim Resolution DH(99)642

H32-            19977          Carriero, Interim Resolution DH(96)26

H32-            31628          Catania, Interim Resolution DH(99)414

H32-            25576          Cavaliero s.n.c., Interim Resolution DH(96)215

H32-            34882          Cecamore, Interim Resolution DH(99)203

H46-            44332          Cecchini, judgment of 21/11/00, final on 21/02/01

H32-            29170          Cerruto, Interim Resolution DH(97)368

H32-            29125          Chierici B. and E., Interim Resolution DH(97)331

H46-            41811          Comitini, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H32-            27494          Corona Vincenzo, Interim Resolution DH(97)020

H32-            25577          Cosma, Interim Resolution DH(96)216

H32-            25588          D.M. II, Interim Resolution DH(96)217

H32-            27996+        D'Amico and Altobelli, Interim Resolution DH(97)130

H54-            25574          De Santa, judgment of 02/09/97

H32-            20359          Della Sala Raffaele, Interim Resolution DH(96)614

H32-            14147+        Di Bonaventura

H32-            30600          G. D.P., Interim Resolution DH(97)525

H32-            25584          G.L.C., Interim Resolution DH(96)218

H32-            31622          G.O. II, Interim Resolution DH(97)654

H32-            25580          Giorgini, Interim Resolution DH(96)219

H54-            25586          Lapalorcia, judgment of 02/09/97

H32-            25581          Latini, Interim Resolution DH(96)220

H32-            15080          Magnaghi, Interim Resolution DH(96)379

H32-            27994+        Manzini and Benet, Interim Resolution DH(97)129

H32-            38149          Mazzone G. and E. (I), Interim Resolution DH(99)306

H32-            38150          Mazzone G. and E. (II), Interim Resolution DH(99)307

H46-            33804          Mennitto, judgment of 05/10/00

H32-            25589          Mentastro, Interim Resolution DH(96)221

H46-            44338          Miele, judgment of 21/11/00, final on 21/02/01

H32-            17814          Mori Puddu, Interim Resolution DH(97)177

H32-            38526          Murgo M, O, and S. and Giannone, Interim Resolution DH(99)415

Sub-Section 4.3

H32-            30322          Nani, Interim Resolution DH(98)193

H54-            25839          Nicodemo, judgment of 02/09/97

H46-            44335          O., judgment of 17/10/00, final on 17/01/01

H32-            18908          P.P. III, Interim Resolution DH(97)111

H32-            35950+        Paglietti and 126 others, Interim Resolution DH(99)99

H32-            34880          Polto Miranda, Interim Resolution DH(99)204

H32-            27999+        Recinelli and Corona, Interim Resolution DH(97)132

H32-            27493          Recinelli, Interim Resolution DH(97)21

H32-            27997          Ridolfi, Interim Resolution DH(97)131

H32-            26865+        Rubbo and others, Interim Resolution DH(96)613

H32-            34881          Ruocco, Interim Resolution DH(99)643

H32-            25582          Sansoni, Interim Resolution DH(96)222

H32-            31625          Santoro Claudio, Interim Resolution DH(97)655

H32-            29672          Scopelliti II, Interim Resolution DH(97)469

H32-            27484+        Serino and others, Interim Resolution DH(97)133

H32-            25450          Spera Michele, Interim Resolution DH(97)372

H32-            34283          Stampacchia, Interim Resolution DH(98)272

H32-            25583          Stracuzzi, Interim Resolution DH(96)241

H32-            25578          Turrina and Scattolini, Interim Resolution DH(96)223

H32-            31620          U. P., Interim Resolution DH(97)656

H32-            38152          Ullo, Interim Resolution DH(99)308

H32-            29301          Vitali II, Interim Resolution DH(97)332

H32-            29302          Vitali III, Interim Resolution DH(97)333

H32-            39170          Zappalà, Interim Resolution DH(99)523

                   - 212 cases before the labour courts

H46-            44390          A.V. II, judgment of 06/11/01, final on 06/02/02

H32-            27991+        Accuosto and Saviello, Interim Resolution DH(97)166

H32-            38141          Altieri, Interim Resolution DH(99)313

H46-            48421          Altomonte, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02

H32-            36648          Ambrosino Antonio, Interim Resolution DH(99)211

H32-            33145          Antonini Giuseppe, Interim Resolution DH(98)124

H32-            28771          Apicella, Interim Resolution DH(97)290

H46-            32375          Aprile De Puoti, judgment of 09/11/99

H46-            44469          Ascolinio, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H32-            27462          Bagli and Musumeci, Interim Resolution DH(97)79

H32-            39891          Balbi, Interim Resolution DH(99)645

H32-            40605          Barone Maria, Interim Resolution DH(99)646

H32-            34271          Belloni, Interim Resolution DH(98)260

H32-            38115          Ben Charfeddine, Interim Resolution DH(99)314

H32-            28769          Benedetto, Interim Resolution DH(97)257

H32-            35918          Buffa, Interim Resolution DH(99)95

H32-            29645          C.A., Interim Resolution DH(97)418

H46-            45883          C.a.r.l. en Liquidation II, judgment of 16/01/01, final on 16/04/01

H46-            45882          C.a.r.l.en Liquidation I, judgment of 16/01/01, final on 16/04/01

H32-            26439          Cagnetta, Interim Resolution DH(96)559

H32-            28747          Cairella, Interim Resolution DH(97)258

H46-            48408          Calo, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02

H32-            40595          Camerino, Interim Resolution DH(99)648

H32-            39169          Capoluongo Giuseppe, Interim Resolution DH(99)649

H32-            40619          Capoluongo M.R.V., Interim Resolution DH(99)650

H32-            28745          Caporaso Carmela, Interim Resolution DH(97)259

H32-            38142          Capozzi Di Stefano, Interim Resolution DH(99)316

H32-            38120          Cappelloni, Interim Resolution DH(99)315

Sub-Section 4.3

H46-            49319          Capri, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02

H46-            48414          Carlucci, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02

H46-            51127          Carolla, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02, revised on 28/11/2002,

                                      final on 28/02/2003[191]

H32-            40612          Caruso Angelina, Interim Resolution DH(99)652

H32-            35339          Cascone and Marrazzo, Interim Resolution DH(98)449

H32-            37136          Cassandra Luigi I, Interim Resolution DH(99)213

H32-            40600          Celentano, Interim Resolution DH(99)653

H32-            29131          Cherubini, Interim Resolution DH(97)369

H46-            56102          Ciampaglia, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02

H32-            31343          Cimadoro, Interim Resolution DH(97)623

H32-            28741          Circelli, Interim Resolution DH(97)260

H32-            28739          Cocchiaro, Interim Resolution DH(97)261

H32-            26827          Conti Filippo, Interim Resolution DH(96)663

H32-            39888          Coppola, Interim Resolution DH(99)651

H32-            38502          Corrarello I, Interim Resolution DH(99)416

H32-            39149          Corrarello II, Interim Resolution DH(99)518

H32-            39146          Correnti, Interim Resolution DH(99)519

H32-            28766+        Cusano and La Salvia, Interim Resolution DH(97)262

H32-            37186          Cutillo, Interim Resolution DH(99)214

H32-            33141          De Candia, Interim Resolution DH(98)125

H32-            28763          De Luca Maria, Interim Resolution DH(97)264

H32-            34254          De Sando, Interim Resolution DH(98)261

H32-            28767          Del Pozzo, Interim Resolution DH(97)265

H32-            28736          Delle Donne, Interim Resolution DH(97)266

H32-            38112          Di Gilio, Voto, Peduto and Notari, Interim Resolution DH(99)318

H46-            43011          Di Niro, judgment of 27/07/00, final on 27/10/00

H32-            23243          Di Paola, Interim Resolution DH(96)242

H32-            40616          Di Santo, Interim Resolution DH(99)654

H46-            44414          Di Sisto, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H32-            28743          D'Onofrio Gelsomina, Interim Resolution DH(97)263

H32-            39153          Dottorini, Interim Resolution DH(99)520

H46-            48404          Dragonetti, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02

H32-            32292          E.Z., Interim Resolution DH(98)42

H46-            48420          Efisio Pisano, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02

H32-            37184          Esposito Loredana, Interim Resolution DH(99)215

H32-            35269          F.V. II, Interim Resolution DH(98)450

H32-            33157          Falbo, Interim Resolution DH(98)126

H32-            27990          Falco, Interim Resolution DH(97)165

H32-            25220          Ferrari Giampiero, Interim Resolution DH(96)212

H46-            33440          Ferrari Marcella I, judgment of 28/07/99

H32-            40613          Formichella, Interim Resolution DH(99)655

H46-            45897          Forte, judgment of 07/11/00, final on 07/02/01

H32-            36619          Franklin, Interim Resolution DH(99)216

H32-            33150          G. D. I, Interim Resolution DH(98)451

H32-            24826          G.B. I, Interim Resolution DH(96)59

H32-            39163          G.B. III, Interim Resolution DH(99)521

H32-            24779          G.B.S., Interim Resolution DH(96)60

H32-            30093          G.D.Z., Interim Resolution DH(97)552

H32-            28744          Gagliarde, Interim Resolution DH(97)267

H32-            37176+        Gazzo, Rossini, Poli, Dal Forno and Ferro, Interim Resolution DH(99)217

Sub-Section 4.3

H32-            28749          Giannini, Interim Resolution DH(97)268

H32-            39905          Gilio Antonia, Interim Resolution DH(99)656

H46-            48407          Giuseppina Romano, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02

H32-            34850          Grassi, Interim Resolution DH(98)356

H32-            26807          Grosso, Interim Resolution DH(96)243

H32-            38144          Iammarino, Interim Resolution DH(99)319

H32-            24806          Iaria, Interim Resolution DH(96)61

H32-            39890          Iescone, Interim Resolution DH(99)657

H32-            39145          Incarbone, Interim Resolution DH(99)522

H32-            27981          Iudica, Interim Resolution DH(97)162

H32-            39889          Izzo Domenico, Interim Resolution DH(99)658

H32-            24694          L.C. I, Interim Resolution DH(96)517

H32-            26442          La Bella, Interim Resolution DH(96)560

H32-            28737          Lamberti, Interim Resolution DH(97)269

H32-            36639          Lapolla, Interim Resolution DH(99)218

H32-            38103          Lentini, Interim Resolution DH(99)320

H32-            38512          Leonessa, Interim Resolution DH(99)417

H32-            37182          Leonetti, Interim Resolution DH(99)219

H32-            40592          Liberato, Interim Resolution DH(99)659

H32-            32291          Lilli, Interim Resolution DH(98)43

H32-            26009          Lombardo Sestilio, Interim Resolution DH(96)518

H32-            28762+        Longo, D'Occhio and Bruno, Interim Resolution DH(97)270

H46-            48405          Lucio Mario Catillo, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02

H32-            27446          M. D.C. I, Interim Resolution DH(97)81

H32-            29166          Maiale, Interim Resolution DH(97)330

H32-            36644          Maniglio, Interim Resolution DH(99)220

H32-            35936          Marasco, Interim Resolution DH(99)321

H32-            35947          Marchese Giuseppina, Interim Resolution DH(99)96

H32-            27202+        Marino Ettore and others, Interim Resolution DH(97)82

H32-            38117          Marsili, Interim Resolution DH(99)322

H32-            29123          Mascia, Interim Resolution DH(97)553

H32-            28750          Massimo, Interim Resolution DH(97)271

H32-            40608          Mastrantone, Interim Resolution DH(99)660

H32-            29649          Mastronunzio, Interim Resolution DH(97)419

H46-            42993          Mattiello, judgment of 27/07/00, final on 27/10/00

H32-            28758          Maturo, Interim Resolution DH(97)272

H46-            49322          Mazzacchera, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02

H32-            28760          Mazzilli, Interim Resolution DH(97)273

H32-            30098          Mecozzi, Interim Resolution DH(97)421

H32-            28752          Mennillo, Interim Resolution DH(97)274

H32-            40594          Mideo, Interim Resolution DH(99)661

H32-            33164          Minieri, Interim Resolution DH(98)357

H32-            39887          Montano, Interim Resolution DH(99)662

H32-            38518          Morzillo, Interim Resolution DH(99)418

H32-            30596          Mostacciulo, Interim Resolution DH(97)549

H32-            32301          Mostacciuolo, Interim Resolution DH(98)44

H32-            26003          Napoli Elio, Interim Resolution DH(96)664

H32-            31348          Napoli, Interim Resolution DH(98)55

H46-            44415          Napolitano, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H46-            51123          Natalina de Rosa, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H32-            21438          Nicoletti, Interim Resolution DH(96)111

H32-            27191          O.F.T., Interim Resolution DH(97)83

H32-            39886          Olgato, Interim Resolution DH(99)663

H32-            38522          Orsillo, Interim Resolution DH(99)419

H46-            40966          P., judgment of 14/12/99, final on 14/03/00

H32-            27193          P.V.G., Interim Resolution DH(97)84

Sub-Section 4.3

H32-            28756          Pagnano, Interim Resolution DH(97)275

H32-            28732          Palma, Interim Resolution DH(97)276

H32-            29152          Paolini, Interim Resolution DH(97)327

H32-            36650          Papa Saletta, Interim Resolution DH(99)222

H32-            36630          Pappalardo, Interim Resolution DH(99)223

H32-            38143          Paradiso Marilena, Interim Resolution DH(99)323

H32-            40611          Parente, Interim Resolution DH(99)664

H32-            28740          Pasquariello, Interim Resolution DH(97)277

H46-            44444          Pastore, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H32-            32277          Patrizi II, Interim Resolution DH(98)045

H32-            26856          Persia, Interim Resolution DH(96)665

H32-            40610          Pesce Agnese, Interim Resolution DH(99)665

H32-            37174          Pesce Giuseppa, Interim Resolution DH(99)224

H32-            36649          Petrillo, Interim Resolution DH(99)225

H32-            34262          Petrone, Interim Resolution DH(98)262

H46-            44529          Pezzuto, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02

H32-            35946          Piazza, Interim Resolution DH(99)097

H46-            46509          Picconi, judgment of 21/11/00, final on 04/04/01

H32-            34837          Piconi, Interim Resolution DH(98)326

H32-            28761          Piesco, Interim Resolution DH(97)278

H32-            28759          Pilla Michele, Interim Resolution DH(97)279

H32-            34279          Pristerà, Interim Resolution DH(98)263

H32-            40622          Proietti Giuseppe, Interim Resolution DH(99)666

H32-            32293          Prologo, Interim Resolution DH(98)46

H32-            17292          R.d.R.

H32-            26045          R.M. III, Interim Resolution DH(96)519

H32-            26429          R.S. III, Interim Resolution DH(96)562

H32-            28722          Radicioni, Interim Resolution DH(97)280

H32-            40615          Ranaldo Pellegrino, Interim Resolution DH(99)667

H32-            33149          Regino, Interim Resolution DH(98)187

H46-            48409          Reino, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02

H32-            28753          Rinaldi, Interim Resolution DH(97)281

H46-            38113          Rotondi II, judgment of 27/04/00, final on 27/07/00

H32-            17336          Rulli

H32-            37162          S.C. V, Interim Resolution DH(99)226

H32-            34246          Sabio, Interim Resolution DH(98)264

H32-            40609          Saccone, Interim Resolution DH(99)668

H32-            28751          Sanzari, Interim Resolution DH(97)282

H32-            38131          Sarli, Interim Resolution DH(99)324

H32-            28754          Sauchella, Interim Resolution DH(97)283

H32-            29165          Savoia II, Interim Resolution DH(97)328

H32-            30107          Scagnoli, Interim Resolution DH(97)550

H46-            44389          Scarfone, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02

H32-            31638          Sciarra, Interim Resolution DH(97)657

H32-            24784          Scognamiglio I, Interim Resolution DH(96)117

H32-            34255          Sellan, Interim Resolution DH(98)265

H32-            28746          Serena and De Filippo, Interim Resolution DH(97)284

H32-            28738          Simeone, Interim Resolution DH(97)285

H32-            27454          Società Italiana Cauzioni S.p.a., Interim Resolution DH(97)85

H32-            30595          Soriano, Interim Resolution DH(97)551

H32-            40607          Sperandeo, Interim Resolution DH(99)669

H32-            34865+        Spiezio and Di Furia, Interim Resolution DH(98)358

H46-            48406          Stefanucci, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02

H32-            33162          Stile, Interim Resolution DH(98)127

H46-            51122          Tarantino, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02

H32-            40591          Tascione, Interim Resolution DH(99)670

H32-            28748          Tedesco Luigi, Interim Resolution DH(97)286

Sub-Section 4.3

H32-            33799          Tesauro, Interim Resolution DH(98)188

H32-            39876          Tola, Interim Resolution DH(99)671

H46-            48410          Tozzi, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02

H46-            45108          Tullio D'Angelo, judgment of 12/10/00, final on 12/01/01

H32-            27466          V.B. I, Interim Resolution DH(97)086

H32-            34871          Venzo, Interim Resolution DH(98)359

H32-            39907          Verde, Interim Resolution DH(99)672

H32-            33785          Vespucci, Interim Resolution DH(98)189

H32-            28755          Vigliotti, Interim Resolution DH(97)287

H46-            44416          Viola, judgments of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02 and of 07/11/02,

                                      final on 07/02/03[192]

H32-            28757          Viscio, Interim Resolution DH(97)288

H32-            33783          Visco and Montuoro I, Interim Resolution DH(98)190

H32-            33784          Visco and Montuoro II, Interim Resolution DH(98)191

H32-            27167          Vitale Rosa, Interim Resolution DH(97)87

H32-            27989          Volpe, Interim Resolution DH(97)164

H32-            17765          Zaffarana, Interim Resolution DH(96)244

H32-            36647          Zampetti, Interim Resolution DH(99)227

H32-            38517          Zito, Interim Resolution DH(99)420

H32-            28735          Zollo, Interim Resolution DH(97)289

H32-            27987          Zuccardi Merli, Interim Resolution DH(97)163

H32-            29134          Zullino, Interim Resolution DH(97)329

                   - 91 cases before the criminal courts

H32-            21807+        A. and A.F. and A.R., Interim Resolution DH(97)176

H32-            27141          A.A.Q. II, Interim Resolution DH(98)128

H32-            21068          A.M. III, Interim Resolution DH(97)366

H32-            23356          A.R. II, Interim Resolution DH(98)47

H32-            21873          Achilli, Interim Resolution DH(98)91

H46-            35207          Aggiato, judgment of 26/04/01, final on 26/07/01

H32-            33454          Albé, Interim Resolution DH(99)421

H32-            22873          Arconte I, Interim Resolution DH(98)48

H32-            31230          Arconte II, Interim Resolution DH(99)102

H46-            44970          Arganese, judgment of 26/04/01, final on 26/07/01

H32-            20854          Arichetta, Interim Resolution DH(97)108

H32-            24920          Ballestra, Interim Resolution DH(98)268

H32-            27584          Bertelli, Interim Resolution DH(99)325

H32-            24909          Bonomo, Interim Resolution DH(99)228

H32-            25541          Bortolussi, Interim Resolution DH(97)554

H32-            27540          Brincat Joseph II, Interim Resolution DH(99)103

H46-            44976          C.P., judgment of 26/04/01, final on 26/07/01

H46-            39997          Cancellieri, judgment of 26/04/01, final on 26/07/01

H32-            16752+        Capoccia Vittorio

H46-            42600          Carbone Biagio, judgment of 04/07/2002, final on 04/10/2002

H32-            27240          Cilione, Interim Resolution DH(99)326

H32-            33950          Cola, Interim Resolution DH(99)422

H32-            24854          Coser Lauro, Interim Resolution DH(97)292

H46-            39714          Davinelli, judgment of 26/04/01, final on 26/07/01

H46-            33969          De Blasiis, judgment of 14/12/99, final on 06/04/00

H32-            23968          De Santis Roberto, Interim Resolution DH(98)269

H46-            41513          Di Donato and 3 others, judgment of 26/04/01, final on 26/07/01

Sub-Section 4.3

H32-            29077          E.M. I, Interim Resolution DH(99)229

H32-            16549          Emmanuele V. and G.

H46-            40457          F.C., judgment of 26/04/01, final on 26/07/01

H32-            35000          F.F., Interim Resolution DH(99)423

H32-            31009          Fabrizi, Interim Resolution DH(99)327

H46-            37263          Falcone Nicolò, judgment of 04/07/2002, final on 04/10/2002

H46-            34203          Ferrarin, judgment of 26/04/01, final on 06/09/01

H32-            28166          Forte II, Interim Resolution DH(98)49

H32-            28591          Frisaldi, Interim Resolution DH(98)270

H32-            17043          G. and A.G. and M.C.

H32-            28664          G.C. V, Interim Resolution DH(98)456

H32-            28666          G.N. II, Interim Resolution DH(98)50

H32-            22120          G.P. III, Interim Resolution DH(97)465

H32-            33605          G.P. V, Interim Resolution DH(99)424

H32-            35554          G.S. VIII, Interim Resolution DH(99)425

H46-            37752          Gelli, judgment of 19/10/99, final on 01/02/00

H32-            28594          Ghignoni, Interim Resolution DH(99)104

H32-            18138          Giner, Interim Resolution DH(95)444

H32-            36057          Giunchiglia, Interim Resolution DH(99)426

H46-            41275          Guarino Carmela, judgment of 26/04/01, final on 06/09/01

H46-            40458          Ialongo, judgment of 26/04/01, final on 26/07/01

H46-            40662          Iarrobino and De Nisco, judgment of 26/04/01, final on 26/07/01

H46-            45260          Icolaro, judgment of 26/04/01, final on 26/07/01

H32-            28963          Isnardi II, Interim Resolution DH(97)659

H32-            23570          L.C. and P.A., Interim Resolution DH(97)464

H32-            22870          L.G. I, Interim Resolution DH(97)294

H32-            33377          L.Z., Interim Resolution DH(99)328

H46-            35742          Ledonne I, judgment of 12/05/99, final on 12/08/99

H46-            38414          Ledonne II, judgment of 12/05/99, final on 12/08/99

H32-            20543          Lupo, Interim Resolution DH(96)107

H32-            29508          M.B. II, Interim Resolution DH(99)329

H32-            22901          M.C. II, Interim Resolution DH(97)466

H32-            24904          Maggiani, Interim Resolution DH(97)660

H46-            41206          Mangascia, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 06/09/01

H46-            37702          Marchetti Alessandro III, judgment of 14/12/99, final on 14/03/00

H46-            43635          Matera Domenico, judgment of 26/04/01, final on 26/07/01

H46-            43350          Maurano, judgment of 26/04/01, final on 26/07/01

H32-            23306          Milioni Guerriero and Mansueti, Interim Resolution DH(97)661

H32-            30605          Mongiardo, Interim Resolution DH(98)457

H32-            28167          Moni Mario, Interim Resolution DH(98)51

H32-            32045          Morelli, Interim Resolution DH(99)105

H32-            28903          Motalli, Interim Resolution DH(97)280

H46-            47681          Motta Luciana, judgment of 26/04/01, final on 06/09/01

H32-            25124+        Nativi, Loriga+, Interim Resolution DH(97)662

H32-            18755          P.B. III, Interim Resolution DH(96)109

H46-            45269          P.G.F., judgment of 05/07/01, final on 05/10/01

H46-            37507          Palmigiano Natale, judgment of 11/01/00, final on 11/04/00

H32-            23310          Poidimani, Interim Resolution DH(97)173

H32-            35007          Profeta, Interim Resolution DH(99)428

H32-            29881          Puccio, Interim Resolution DH(98)458

H32-            29530          Rossi Antonio, Interim Resolution DH(98)459

H46-            40693          Rotellini and Barnabei, judgment of 26/04/01, final on 26/07/01

H46-            45480          S.G., S.M. and P.C., judgment of 26/04/01, final on 26/07/01

H46-            36719          Saccomanno, judgment of 12/05/99, final on 12/08/99

Sub-Section 4.3

H32-            21567          Salerno, Interim Resolution DH(97)174

H46-            43536          Schiappacasse, judgment of 26/04/01, final on 26/07/01

H32-            32728          Spissu, Interim Resolution DH(99)330

H46-            34081          Starace, judgment of 27/04/00, final on 27/07/00

H32-            33749          Suraci A. and A., Interim Resolution DH(99)331

H46-            45264          Tommaso Palumbo, judgment of 26/04/01, final on 26/07/01

H32-            33691          V.B. III, Interim Resolution DH(99)332

H32-            28839          Viezzer, Interim Resolution DH(98)271

H32-            29510          Vocca, Interim Resolution DH(98)460

H32-            31461          Zaia, Interim Resolution DH(2000)21

- 4 cases against Turkey

H46-            25781          Cyprus against Turkey, judgment of 10/05/01 – Grand Chamber

H54-            15318          Loizidou, judgments of 18/12/96 (merits) and 28/07/98 (just satisfaction) –

                                      Interim Resolutions DH(99)680, DH(2000)105 and ResDH(2001)80[193]

H46-            26308          Institut de Prêtres français and others, judgment of 14/12/00 – Friendly settlement

H46-            29900+        Sadak, Zana, Dicle and Doğan, judgment of 17/07/01

SECTION 5 - SUPERVISION OF GENERAL MEASURES ALREADY ANNOUNCED

(See Addendum 5 for part or all these cases)

Action

The Deputies are invited to supervise progress in the adoption of general measures aiming at preventing further similar violations to those found by the Court in the following cases. If necessary, supplementary information on some or all the cases listed below will appear in Addendum 5. The Deputies are invited to resume consideration of these cases in 6 months at the latest.

                   SUB-SECTION 5.1 – LEGISLATIVE AND/OR REGULATORY CHANGES

- 4 cases against Belgium

H46-            34989          Goedhart, judgment of 20/03/01, final on 20/06/01

H46-            36449+        Stroek, judgment of 20/03/01, final on 20/06/01

H54-            25357          Aerts, judgment of 30/07/98

H46-            26103          Van Geyseghem, judgment of 21/01/99

- 19 cases against Poland

H46-            27785          Włoch, judgment of 19/10/00, final on 22/01/01

H46-            24244          Migoń, judgment of 25/06/2002, final on 25/09/2002[194]

                   - Cases of length of civil proceedings

H54-            27916          Podbielski, judgment of 30/10/98

H54-            28616          Styranowski, judgment of 30/10/98

H46-            38328          Bejer, judgment of 04/10/01, final on 04/01/02[195]

H46-            27918          C., judgment of 03/05/01

H46-            48001          Goc, judgment of 16/04/02, défintif le 16/07/02

H46-            29695          Gronuś, judgment of 28/05/02, défintif le 28/08/02

H46-            29691          Jedamski, judgment of 26/07/01, final on 26/10/01

H46-            43779          Mączyński, judgment of 15/01/02, final on 15/04/02

H46-            35843          Malinowska, judgment of 14/12/00, final on 14/03/01

H46-            36250          Parciński, judgment of 18/03/01, final on 18/03/02

H46-            29455          Pogorzelec, judgment of 17/07/01, final on 12/12/01

H46-            25693+        Sobczyk, judgment of 26/10/00, final on 26/01/01

H46-            40835          Szaparo, judgment of 23/05/02, final on 23/08/02

H46-            48684          Uthke, judgment of 18/06/02, défintif le 18/09/02[196]

H46-            32734          Wasilewski, judgment of 21/12/00, final on 06/09/01

H46-            33082          Wojnowicz, judgment of 21/09/00, final on 22/01/01

H46-            34158          Zawadzki, judgment of 20/12/01, final on 27/03/02

                   SUB-SECTION 5.2 – CHANGES OF COURTS’ CASE-LAW OR OF ADMINISTRATIVE PRACTICE

                   No new case

                   SUB-SECTION 5.3 – PUBLICATION / DISSEMINATION

                   (NO DEBATE ENVISAGED)

- 2 cases against Austria

H46-            34315          Krone Verlag Gmbh and Co. Kg., judgment of 26/02/02, final on 26/05/02

H46-            28525          Unabhängige Initiative Informationsvielfalt, judgment of 26/02/02, final on 26/05/02

- 1 case against Italy

H46-            43269          Leoni, judgment of 26/10/00, final on 04/04/01

                   SUB-SECTION 5.4 – OTHER MEASURES

                   No new case

SECTION 6 - CASES AWAITING FOR THE PRESENTATION OF A DRAFT RESOLUTION

Action

At the time of issuing the present annotated Agenda and Order of Business, the Secretariat was preparing, in consultation with the Permanent Representations concerned, draft resolutions aiming at closing the examination of these cases. The Deputies are invited to postpone consideration of these cases to their next meeting.

Section 6

- 20 cases against Austria

H46-            37075          Luksch, judgment of 13/12/01, final on 13/03/02

H46-            27783          T., judgment of 14/11/00

H46-            31266          G.H., judgment of 03/10/00, final on 03/01/01

H46-            26297          G.S., judgment of 21/12/99

H46-            35019          Ludescher, judgment of 20/12/01, final on 20/03/02

H46-            33915          Walder, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 17/09/01

H32-            17291          Hortolomei

H46-            37950          Franz Fischer, judgment of 29/05/01, final on 29/08/01

H46-            26958          Jerusalem, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H54-            15153          Vereinigung Demokratischer Soldaten Österreichs and Berthold Gubi,

                                      judgment of 19/12/94

H32-            26113          Wirtschafts-Trend Zeitschriften Verlagsgesellchaft m.b.H.

H46-            25878          Michael Edward Cooke, judgment of 08/02/00

H46-            30428          Beer Gertrude, judgment of 06/02/01

H46-            35115          Riepan, judgment of 14/11/00, final on 14/02/01

H46-            33382          Fischer Joseph, judgment of 17/01/02, final on 17/04/02

H46-            28501          Pobornikoff, judgment of 03/10/00

H46-            33501          Telfner, judgment of 20/03/01, final on 20/06/01

H46-            32381          Baischer, judgment of 20/12/01, final on 20/03/02

H46-            29477          Eisenstecken, judgment of 03/10/00

H46-            34320          Freiheitliche Landesgruppe Burgenland, judgment of 18/07/2002 –

                                      Friendly settlement

- 2 cases against Bulgaria

H32-            30381          Mironov - Interim Resolution DH(99)352

H46-            32438          Stefanov, judgment of 03/05/01, final on 03/08/01 - Friendly settlement

- 3 cases against Cyprus

H46-            29515          Larkos, judgment of 18/02/99

H46-            50516          Georgiadis, judgment of 14/05/2002, final on 14/08/2002

H46-            47293          Selim, judgment of 16/07/2002 - Friendly settlement

- 3 cases against the Czech Republic

H46-            33644          Cesky, judgment of 06/06/00, final on 06/09/00

H46-            31315          Punzelt, judgment of 25/04/00, final on 25/07/00

H46-            35848          Barfuss, judgment of 31/07/00, final on 31/10/00

- 2 cases against Denmark

H46-            48470          Jensen, judgment of 14/02/02 – Friendly settlement

H46-            56811          Amrollahi, judgment of 11/07/2002, final on 11/10/2002

- 1 case against Finland

H46-            25651          L., judgment of 27/04/00, final on 27/07/00

- 88 cases against France

H46-            34791          Khalfaoui, judgment of 14/12/99, final on 14/03/00

H46-            31070          Van Pelt, judgment of 23/05/00, final on 23/08/00

Section 6

H46-            29507          Slimane-Kaïd II, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 17/05/00[197]

H46-            31819+        Annoni Di Gussola, Desbordes and Omer, judgment of 14/11/00, final on 14/02/01

H32-            27659          Ferville

H32-            28845          Venot

H46-            34553          Dulaurans, judgment of 21/03/00

H32-            33656          Lemoine Daniel

H32-            17572          A.C.

H54-            25201          Guerin, judgment of 29/07/98

H54-            24767          Omar, judgment of 29/07/98

H54-            14032          Poitrimol, judgment of 23/11/93

H46-            25444          Pelissier and Sassi, judgment of 25/03/99

H46-            27362          Voisine, judgment of 08/02/00

H32-            27413          Cazes

H46-            25803          Selmouni, judgment of 28/07/99 - Grand Chamber

H46-            34406          Mazurek, judgment of 01/02/00, final on 01/05/00

H46-            25088          Chassagnou and others, judgment of 29/04/99

H54-            25017          Mehemi, judgment of 06/09/97

H32-            27019          Slimane-Kaïd I

H54-            23618          Lambert Michel, judgment of 24/08/98

H32-            24263          Areno

H46-            37786          Debboub Husseini Ali, judgment of 09/11/99, final on 09/02/00

H32-            23438          Elbialy

H32-            22578          G.N. II

H46-            39779+        Gombert and Gochgarian, judgment of 13/02/201, final on 13/05/01

H54-            28213          I.A., judgment of 23/09/98

H32-            18847          J-P.DV

H32-            15091          L.D.

H32-            21911          Lanza

H32-            17831          Morganti

H54-            21802          Muller, judgment of 17/03/97

H46-            38781          P.B., judgment of 01/08/00, final on 01/11/00

H46-            34947          Richet, judgment of 13/02/01, final on 13/05/01

H32-            24245          Touihri

H46-            42211          Zannouti, judgment of 31/07/01, final on 31/10/01

H46-            38687          Djaid, judgment of 29/09/99, final on 29/12/99

H46-            49342          Dunan, judgment of 30/10/01 – Friendly settlement

H46-            49350          Ivars, judgment of 30/10/01 – Friendly settlement

H46-            41333          Brochu, judgment of 12/06/01, final on 12/09/01

H46-            39066          Donnadieu, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H46-            33933          Guisset, judgment of 26/09/00, final on 26/09/00

H32-            31603          Hermant

H46-            43713          Joly, judgment of 27/03/01, final on 27/06/01

H46-            35589          Kanoun, judgment of 03/10/00, final on 03/01/01

H46-            41943          L.L., judgment of 07/02/02, final on 07/05/02

H46-            47575          Marks and Ordinateur Express, judgment of 21/02/02, final on 21/05/02

H32-            26496          Société Fruehauf France

H46-            36932          Caillot, judgment of 04/06/99, final on 04/09/99

H46-            38249          Arvois, judgment of 23/11/99, final on 23/02/00

H46-            28660          Ballestra, judgment of 12/12/00, final on 12/03/01

H46-            33207          Blaisot C. and M., judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00

H46-            42401          Camps, judgment of 24/10/00, final on 09/04/01

H46-            54757          Chaufour, judgment of 19/03/02, final on 19/06/02

Section 6

H46-            41449          Durrand I, judgment of 13/11/01, final on 13/02/02

H46-            42038          Durrand II, judgment of 13/11/01, final on 13/02/02

H46-            30979          Frydlender, judgment of 27/06/00

H46-            48205+        Gentilhomme, Schaff-Benhadji and Zerouki, judgment of 14/05/2002,

                                      final on 14/08/2002

H46-            44066          Grass, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01

H46-            41001          Joseph-Gilbert Garcia, judgment of 26/09/00, final on 26/12/00

H46-            37387          Lambourdiere, judgment of 02/08/00, final on 02/11/00

H46-            39996          Ouendeno, judgment of 16/04/2002, final on 10/07/2002[198]

H32-            32510          Peter

H46-            33989          Thery, judgment of 01/02/00, final on 01/05/00

H46-            38042          Zanatta, A. and J.-B., judgment of 28/03/00, final on 28/06/00

H46-            53118          Boiseau, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02

H32-            31842          Darmagnac Pierre V

H46-            40493          Jacquie and Ledun, judgment of 28/03/00, final on 28/06/00

H46-            44617          Leray and others, judgment of 20/12/01, final on 20/03/02

H46-            42588          Linard, judgment of 25/06/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43288          Mahieu, judgment of 19/06/01

H32-            25309          Maljean

H46-            45573          Moyer, judgment of 25/06/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-            37565          Sapl, judgment of 18/12/01, final on 18/03/02

H46-            46708          Zaheg, judgment of 9/02/02, final on 19/05/02

H54-            36313          Henra, judgment of 29/04/98

H54-            36317          Leterme, judgment of 29/04/98

H54-            32217          Pailot, judgment of 22/04/98

H54-            33441          Richard, judgment of 22/04/98

H32-            27518          A.S.

H46-            46693          Chapus, judgment of 24/10/00, final on 24/01/01

H46-            47194          Leboeuf, judgment of 26/03/02 – Friendly settlement

H46-            38398          Leclercq, judgment of 28/11/00, final on 28/02/01

H46-            44791          Marcel, judgment of 09/04/02 – Friendly settlement

H32-            35259          Nagler

H46-            42406          Vallar, judgment of 19/03/02, final on 19/06/02

H46-            37257          Lucas, judgment of 28/11/00, final on 28/02/01

H46-            32033          Thurin, judgment of 28/11/00, final on 28/02/01

- 3 cases against Germany

H46-            23541          Garcia Alva, judgment of 13/02/01

H46-            24479          Lietzow, judgment of 13/02/01

H46-            25116          Schöps, judgment of 13/02/01

- 34 cases against Greece

H46-            42079          E.H., judgment of 25/10/01, final on 27/03/02

H32-            32397          Sinnesael, Interim Resolution DH(99)130

H54-            21522          Georgiadis Anastasios, judgment of 29/05/97

H46-            53478          Sajtos, judgment of 21/03/2002, final on 21/06/2002

H32-            34373          Goutsos, Interim Resolution DH(99)558

H46-            47734          Adamogiannis, judgment of 14/03/2002, final on 14/06/2002

H46-            38178          Serif, judgment of 14/12/99, final on 14/03/00

Section 6

H54-            18748          Manoussakis and others, judgment of 25/09/96

H46-            40434          Kosmopolis S. A., judgment of 29/03/01, final on 29/06/01

H46-            30342          Academy Trading Ltd and others, judgment of 04/04/00

H54-            28523          Portington, judgment of 23/09/98

H46-            38971          Protopapa and Marangou, judgment of 28/03/00, final on 28/06/00

H46-            40437          Tsingour, judgment of 06/07/00, final on 06/10/00

H46-            41459          Fatourou, judgment of 03/08/00, final on 03/11/00

H54-            20323          Pafitis and others, judgment of 26/02/98

H46-            38459          Varipati, judgment of 26/10/99, final on 26/01/00

H32-            34569          Société anonyme Dimitrios Koutsoumbos, société technique,

                                      commerciale and touristique

H32-            32857          Stamoulakatos Nicholas I

H46-            37439          Agga, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00

H54-            19773          Philis 2, judgment of 27/06/97

H54-            18357          Hornsby, judgment of 19/03/97

H46-            37098          Antonakopoulos, Vortsela and Antonakopoulou, judgment of 14/12/99,

                                      final on 21/03/00

H46-            31107          Iatridis, judgments of 25/03/99 and 19/10/00 (Article 41) – Grand Chamber

H46-            41209          Georgiadis Dimitrios, judgment of 28/03/00, final on 28/06/00

H46-            28802          Tsavachidis, judgment of 21/01/99

H54-            19233+        Tsirlis and Kouloumpas, judgment of 29/05/97

H46-            43597          Dionyssios Petrotos, judgment of 29/02/00 –Friendly settlement

H46-            34369          Thlimmenos, judgment of 06/04/00

H46-            38704          Savvidou, judgment of 01/08/00, final on 01/11/00

H46-            41867          Messochoritis, judgment of 12/04/01, final on 12/07/01

H32-            24453          Tarighi Wageh Dashti

H46-            46380          LSI Information Technologies, judgment of 20/12/01, final on 20/03/02

H54-            24348          Grigoriades, judgment of 25/11/97

H54-            23372+        Larissis and others, judgment of 24/02/98

- 2 cases against Hungary

H46-            32396          Magyar, judgment of 11/01/01, final on 11/04/01

H46-            38937          Erdős, judgment of 09/04/2002, final on 09/07/2002

- 1 case against Ireland

H46-            33267          Croke, judgment of 21/12/00, final on 21/03/01 - Friendly settlement

- 89 cases against Italy

H46-            37019          A.M., judgment of 14/12/99, final on 14/03/00

H46-            31227          Ambruosi, judgment of 19/10/00, final on 19/01/01

H54-            14025          Zubani, judgments of 07/08/96 and 16/06/99

H32-            16609          Intrieri

H32-            27253          Biasetti

H46-            44955          Mancini Vittorio and Luigi, judgment of 02/08/01, final on 12/12/01

H32-            25650          Santandrea

H46-            41221          Troiani Marcello, judgment of 06/12/2001, final on 10/07/2002

H46-            40979          Conte Riccardo II, judgment of 05/04/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            40954          D’Alessandro, judgment of 05/04/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            44814+        M.A. and 81 others, judgment of 30/11/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            40978          Mantini, judgment of 05/04/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            40956          Marchetti, judgment of 05/04/00 - Friendly settlement

Section 6

H46-            44344          Marcotrigiano, judgment of 19/12/00

H46-            41812          Piccirillo Aldo, judgment of 09/01/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43077          A.S. II, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43092          Ascierto Pietro, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43048          Bernardo, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43005          Bianchi Michele, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            38973          Borrillo, judgment of 22/06/00 – Friendly settlement

H46-            40975          Bucci, judgment of 05/04/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43082          C.S., judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43081          C.T., judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43073          Camerlengo, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43007          Capasso, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43008          Catillo, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43107          Circelli Maria Carmela, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            42989          Costantini, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            40960          Dattilo, judgment of 05/04/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43014          D’Errico, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43044          De Cicco Giuseppe, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43003          De Fiore, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43013          De Nunzio, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            42992          Del Grosso, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43047          Del Vecchio Edvige, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43009          Di Biase Maria, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            42991          Falzarano, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43045          Forgione, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43049          Fusco Adelia, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43104          Galietti, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43002          Giorgio Nicola, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43103          Lombardi Gianfranco and 7 others, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43105          Intorcia, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43006          La Vista, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43080          M.A.P., judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            42990          Manganiello, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            40722          Marotta, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            42988          Marucci, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            42994          Mascolo, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43046          Masella, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43001          Masuccio, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            42995          Mirra, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43071          Narciso, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43079          P.C. IV, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43089          Pellegrino Rossi, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43090          Perugini, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43106          Rossi Lina, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43108          Selvaggio, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43004          Verzino, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            43078          Z., judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            54288          Andreozzi, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-            54297          Aniceto, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-            54309          Carretta, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-            54313          Castiello, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-            54292          Cerasomma, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-            54291          Caproni, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-            54290+        D'Agostino Francesco, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

Section 6

H46-            44401          Fermi and others, judgment of 06/11/01 – Friendly settlement

H46-            54280          Giordano, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-            54302          Incollingo, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-            54301          Jaculli, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-            54294          Fiore Mario, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-            54296          Manera, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-            54306          Masia, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-            54308          Mignanelli, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-            54318          Picano, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-            54279          Prete, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-            54314          Quacquarelli, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-            54284          Radicchi, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-            54298          Sabetta, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-            54311          Soave, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-            54303          Spatrisano, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-            54305          Tamburrini, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-            54285          Tatangelo, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-            54315          Tortolani, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-            54295          Trovato, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-            54317          Zullo Rocco, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02

H46-            38415          C.M.F., judgment of 18/07/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-            39797          Guazzone, judgment of 11/07/2002 - Friendly settlement (rectified on 01/08/2002)

- 1 case against Latvia

H46-            50108          Kulakova, judgment of 18/10/01 – Friendly settlement

- 7 cases against Lithuania

H46-            37975          Graužinis, judgment of 10/10/00, final on 10/01/01

H46-            36743          Grauslys, judgment of 10/10/00, final on 10/01/01

H46-            34578          Jėčius, judgment of 31/07/00

H46-            47679          Stašaitis, judgment of 21/03/2002, final on 21/06/2002

H46-            42095          Daktaras, judgment of 10/10/00, final on 18/01/01

H46-            44558          Valašinas, judgment of 24/07/01, final on 24/10/01

H46-            44800          Puzinas, judgment of 14/03/02, final on 14/06/02

- 3 cases against Luxembourg

H46-            21156          G.J., judgment of 26/10/00

H46-            41761          Scheele, judgment of 17/05/01, final on 17/08/01

H46-            45165          Matthies-Lenzen, judgment of 05/02/02 – Friendly settlement

- 8 cases against the Netherlands

H32-            14084          R.V. and others - Interim Resolution DH(2000)25

H46-            28369          Camp and Bourimi, judgment of 03/10/00

H46-            29192          Ciliz, judgment of 11/07/00

H46-            31725          Köksal, judgment of 20/03/01 – Friendly settlement

H46-            58964          K.K.C., judgment of 21/12/01 – Friendly settlement

H46-            33258          Holder, judgment of 05/06/01 – Friendly settlement

H46-            36499          Samy, judgment of 18/06/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-            34549          Meulendijks, judgment of 14/05/2002, final on 14/08/2002

Section 6

- 6 cases against Poland

H46-            28358          Baranowski, judgment of 28/03/00

H46-            31382          Kurzac, judgment of 22/02/01, final on 22/05/01

H46-            38670          Dewicka, judgment of 04/04/00, final on 04/07/00

H46-            51669          Pałys, judgment of 11/12/01 – Friendly settlement

H46-            25874          Kawka, judgment of 09/01/01

H46-            33310          H.D., judgment of 20/06/2002 - Friendly settlement

- 12 cases against Portugal

H46-            42636          Bento Da Mota, judgment of 28/06/01, final on 28/09/01

H46-            37010          Conde, judgment of 23/03/00, final on 23/06/00

H46-            47459          Fernandes João, judgment of 18/04/2002, final on 18/07/2002

H46-            36668          Fertiladour S.A., judgment of 18/05/00, final on 18/08/00

H46-            37698          Lopes Gomes da Silva, judgment of 28/09/00, final on 28/12/00

H46-            37528          Martins and Garcia Alves, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01

H54-            15777          Matos and Silva and 2 others, judgment of 16/09/96

H46-            42918          Nascimento, judgment of 27/09/01, final on 27/12/01

H46-            33290          Salgueiro Da Silva Mouta, judgment of 21/12/99, final on 21/03/00

H46-            48959          Azevedo Moreira, judgment of 30/05/02 - Friendly settlement

H46-            46462          Rego Chaves Fernandes, judgment of 21/03/2002, final on 21/06/2002

H46-            48526          Viana Montenegro Carneiro, judgment of 30/05/02 - Friendly settlement

- 1 case against Romania

H32-            32922          C.C.M.C.

- 7 cases against the Slovak Republic

H46-            34753          Jóri, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01

H46-            40345          Stančiak, judgment of 12/04/01, final on 12/07/01

H46-            29032          Feldek, judgment of 12/07/01, final on 12/10/01

H46-            32686          Marônek, judgment of 19/04/01, final on 19/07/01

H46-            46843          Remšíková, judgment of 17/05/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-            24530          Vodeničarov, judgment of 21/12/00

H46-            38794          J.K., judgment of 23/07/2002 - Friendly settlement

- 2 cases against Slovenia

H46-            29462          Rehbock, judgment of 28/11/00

H46-            28400          Majarič, judgment of 08/02/00

- 4 cases against Sweden

H46-            26978          Beck, judgment of 09/01/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-            28222          Muonio Saami Village, judgment of 09/01/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-            32531          Jakola, judgment of 06/03/01 – Friendly settlement

H46-            30526          De Laczay Ervin and Olga, judgment of 24/09/2002 - Friendly settlement

- 13 cases against Switzerland

H46-            27154          D.N., judgment of 29/03/01 - Grand Chamber

H46-            33958          Wettstein, judgment of 21/12/00, final on 21/03/01

Section 6

H46-            27798          Amann, judgment of 16/02/00 - Grand Chamber

H54-            23224          Kopp, judgment of 25/03/98

H32-            26452          D’Amico Heidi and Salvatore

H46-            54273          Boultif, judgment of 02/08/01, final on 02/11/01

H46-            24699          VGT Verein Gegen Tierfabriken, judgment of 28/06/01, final on 28/09/01

H46-            37292          F.R., judgment of 28/06/01, final on 28/09/01

H46-            33499          Ziegler, judgment of 21/02/02, final on 21/05/02

H46-            27426          G.B., judgment of 30/11/00, final on 01/03/01

H46-            28256          M.B., judgment of 30/11/00, final on 01/03/01

H32-            27613          P.B.

H54-            19800          R.M.D., judgment of 26/09/97 - Interim Resolution DH(99)678

- 59 cases against Turkey

H46-            33322          Özdiler and Bakan, judgment of 27/06/2002 - Friendly settlement

H46-            29495          Erdemli, judgment of 30/10/01, final on 30/10/01

H46-            29295+        Ecer and Zeyrek, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01

H46-            31850          Günay and others, judgment of 27/09/01, final on 27/12/01

H46-            34686          Sürek Kamil Tekin, judgment of 14/06/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-            29851          Zana, judgment of 06/03/01, final on 06/06/01

H46-            32983          Çavuşoğlu, judgment of 06/03/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-            24947          Ekinci Lalihan, judgment of 05/06/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-            31849          İşçi, judgment of 25/09/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-            24669          Karataş and Boğa, judgment of 17/10/00 - Friendly settlement

H46-            24937          Koç Fırat, judgment of 05/06/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-            24933          Kürküt, judgment of 10/07/01 – Friendly settlement

H46-            31733          Tuncay and Ozlem Kaya, judgment of 08/11/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-            28011          Yeşiltepe, judgment of 10/07/01 – Friendly settlement

H46-            35980          Z.E., judgment of 07/06/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-            29862          Bağci and Murğ, judgment of 10/07/01 – Friendly settlement

H46-            31882          Çakmak, judgment of 10/07/01 – Friendly settlement

H46-            32450          Çaloğlu, judgment of 10/07/01 – Friendly settlement

H46-            31896          Değerli, judgment of 22/05/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-            29866+        Demir C., Demir M. and Gül, judgment of 10/07/01 – Friendly settlement

H46-            29883+        Fidan, Çağro and Özarslaner, judgment of 10/07/01 – Friendly settlement

H46-            31787          Göktaş and others, judgment of 25/09/01

H46-            31249          Gündüz and others, judgment of 14/11/01 – Friendly settlement

H46-            24932          Kaplan, judgment of 26/02/02 – Friendly settlement

H46-            28013+        Karatepi and Kirt, judgment of 17/07/01 – Friendly settlement

H46-            34499          Kortak, judgment of 31/05/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-            31895          Morsümbül, judgment of 25/09/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-            30495          Mutlu and Yildiz, judgment of 10/07/01 – Friendly settlement

H46-            28014+        Okuyucu, Kara and Bilmen, judgment of 17/07/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-            30453          Özata and others, judgment of 22/05/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-            29425          Özçelik and others, judgment of 10/07/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-            36760          Şanlı and Erol, judgment of 22/05/01 - Friendly settlement

H46-            37191          Yildirim and others, judgment of 25/09/01

H46-            34684          Yolcu, judgment of 05/02/02 – Friendly settlement

H46-            19264          Aktaş and others, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01

H32-            22907          Atatür A. and M., and Pamir

H46-            19266          Baltekin, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01

H46-            19267          Bilgin Mehmet and others, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01

H46-            19268          Bilgin Saniye and others, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01

H46-            19269          Bozkurt and others, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01

Section 6

H46-            19272          Çalkan and others, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01

H46-            19273          Çapar, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01

H46-            19274          Çelebi Hamdi, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01

H46-            19275          Çelebi Yusuf, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01

H46-            19276          Çiplak and others, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01

H46-            19277          Daniş, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01

H46-            19278          Erol, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01

H46-            19280          Gökgöz, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01

H46-            19281          Gökmen and others, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01

H46-            38931          İ.S., judgment of 28/03/02 – Friendly settlement

H46-            19270          Ilhan Buzcu and others, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01

H46-            19283          Işik Ayşe and others, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01

H46-            19284          Işik Yilmaz and others, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01

H46-            19286          Karabulut Sefer, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01

H46-            19271          Nuriye Buzcu, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01

H46-            19287          Özen, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01

H46-            19288          Öztekin, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01

H46-            31312          Eğinlioğlu, judgment of 20/12/01 – Friendly settlement

H46-            29921          Büker, judgment of 24/10/00, final on 24/01/01

- 17 cases against the United Kingdom

H46-            48521          Armstrong, judgment of 16/07/2002, final on 16/10/2002

H46-            24724          T., judgment of 16/12/99 - Grand Chamber

H46-            24888          V., judgment of 16/12/99 - Grand Chamber

H46-            29545          Devlin, judgment of 30/10/01, final on 30/01/02

H46-            45276          Hilal, judgment of 06/03/01, final on 06/06/01

H54-            24839          Bowman, judgment of 19/02/98

H46-            35685          Mills, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01

H32-            27237          Govell

H32-            26109          Santa Cruz Ruiz

H54-            24838          Steel, Lush, Needham, Polden and Cole, judgment of 23/09/98

H46-            35394          Khan, judgment of 12/05/00, final on 05/10/00

H46-            28901          Rowe and Davis, judgment of 16/02/00

H46-            35718          Condron, judgment of 02/05/00, final on 02/08/00

H46-            33274          Foxley, judgment of 20/06/00, final on 20/09/00

H46-            39360          S.B.C., judgment of 19/06/01, final on 19/09/01

H54-            20605          Halford, judgment of 25/06/97 - Interim Resolution DH(1999)725

H46-            36670          Duyonov and others, judgment of 02/10/01 – Friendly settlement

c. PREPARATION OF THE NEXT DH MEETING
(834th MEETING, 8-9 April 2003)

(See Addendum Preparation of the next meeting)

Action

The Deputies are invited to approve the preliminary lists of items to be examined at the next DH meeting, which appears in Addendum Preparation of the next meeting to the present annotated agenda and order of business.