|
MINISTERS’ DEPUTIES |
Resolutions |
CM/ResDH(2021)109 |
9 June 2021 |
|
Resolution CM/ResDH(2021)109 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights Twenty-six cases against Turkey (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 9 June 2021 |
|
Case |
Judgment of |
Final on |
|
|
64138/11 |
POLAT |
07/05/2019 |
07/05/2019 |
|
53319/10 |
UÇAR |
05/03/2019 |
05/03/2019 |
|
69448/10 |
DAĞTEKİN |
28/05/2019 |
28/05/2019 |
|
33513/11 |
DAĞTEKİN |
28/05/2019 |
28/05/2019 |
|
73487/12 |
TAŞ ÇAKAR |
28/05/2019 |
28/05/2019 |
|
73954/11 |
KILINÇ |
02/07/2019 |
02/07/2019 |
|
35575/12 |
ETE |
03/09/2019 |
03/09/2019 |
|
66575/12 |
YILDIZ |
03/09/2019 |
03/09/2019 |
|
62928/12 |
ARAMAZ |
01/10/2019 |
01/10/2019 |
|
54093/10 |
ALTUN AND OTHERS |
10/07/2018 |
10/07/2018 |
|
47455/10 |
ABAY |
04/02/2020 |
04/02/2020 |
|
47884/10 |
BAYDEMİR |
15/01/2019 |
15/01/2019 |
|
73783/11 |
BAKIRHAN |
17/03/2020 |
17/03/2020 |
|
9662/10 |
YURTDAŞ AND SÖYLEMEZ |
19/11/2019 |
19/11/2019 |
|
69604/12+ |
YAMAÇ |
01/10/2019 |
01/10/2019 |
|
74054/11 |
YILDIRIM |
25/09/2018 |
25/09/2018 |
|
54698/13 |
KALKAN |
01/10/2019 |
01/10/2019 |
|
21196/12 |
KALKAN |
01/10/2019 |
01/10/2019 |
|
63681/12 |
AKYÜZ |
07/05/2019 |
07/05/2019 |
|
22112/12 |
AKTAŞ AND OTHERS |
01/10/2019 |
01/10/2019 |
|
27167/12 |
ZÜMRÜT |
17/03/2020 |
17/03/2020 |
|
30905/09 |
ALİ ÇETİN |
20/06/2017 |
20/09/2017 |
|
44982/07 |
ONAL No. 2 |
02/07/2019 |
02/10/2019 |
|
29680/05 |
DİLİPAK |
15/09/2015 |
02/05/2016 |
|
871/08 |
ÖZER No. 2 |
26/01/2010 |
26/04/2010 |
|
37721/97 |
ERKANLI |
13/02/2003 |
Friendly settlement |
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”,
Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established on account of the authorities’ unjustified interference with the applicants’ right to freedom of expression due to the criminal proceedings initiated under various articles of the Criminal Code of Anti-Terrorism Law (violations of Article 10 and in some of the cases also of Article 5);
Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:
- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum; and
- of general measures preventing similar violations;
Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;
Having examined the information provided by the government indicating the individual measures adopted to give effect to the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2021)379)
Considering that the question of individual measures was therefore resolved, given, inter alia, that the domestic proceedings have been reopened and the applicants have been acquitted or they have not asked for the reopening of the proceedings or the charges have been dropped or the proceedings became time-barred; and none of them is still detained on account of those proceedings;
Recalling that the question of general measures required in response to the shortcomings found by the Court in the present judgments continues to be examined within the framework of the Öner and Türk (51962/12), Altuğ Taner Akcam (27520/07), Nedim Şener (38270/11) and Artun and Guvener (75510/01) groups of cases and that the closure of these cases therefore in no way prejudges the Committee’s evaluation of the general measures required,
DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases as regards the individual measures and
DECIDES to close the examination of these cases.