Ministers' Deputies
Decisions
CM/Del/Dec(2003)827 (unclassified) 27 March 2003
Volume I – APPENDICES
————————————————
827th (DH) meeting, 11 and 12 February 2003
Appendices adopted
(Formal date of adoption: 24 February 2003)
————————————————
827th meeting (DH) – 11 and 12 February 2003
CONTENTS
APPENDICES
Pages
APPENDIX 3 827th MEETING OF THE MINISTERS' DEPUTIES
(Strasbourg, 11 and 12 February 2003, DH)
ANNOTATED AGENDA AND ORDER OF BUSINESS (PUBLIC)................................ 4
AND
827th MEETING OF THE MINISTERS' DEPUTIES
(Strasbourg, 11 and 12 February 2003, DH)
APPENDIX TO THE ANNOTATED AGENDA AND ORDER OF BUSINESS............. 103
APPENDIX 2 834th MEETING OF THE MINISTERS' DEPUTIES
(Strasbourg, 9 and 10 April 2003, DH)
PRELIMINARY LIST OF ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION (PUBLIC).......................... 143
827th meeting (DH) – 11 and 12 February 2003
APPENDIX 3
827th METING OF THE MINISTERS’ DEPUTIES
(Strasbourg, 11 and 12 February 2003 – DH)
ANNOTATED AGENDA AND ORDER OF BUSINESS
Document made public in pursuance of the decision taken at the 749th meeting (DH) (17 April 2001) – item d.
CONTENTS
SECTION 5 - SUPERVISION OF GENERAL MEASURES ALREADY ANNOUNCED
SECTION 6 - CASES AWAITING FOR THE PRESENTATION OF A DRAFT RESOLUTION
c. PREPARATION OF THE NEXT DH MEETING (834th MEETING, 9-10 April 2003)
Additional documents
Addendum General Questions
Addendum 1 - Final Resolutions
Addendum 4 – Cases raising special questions
Addendum Preparation of the next DH meeting (834th meeting, 9-10 April 2003)
Appendix to the Draft Annotated Agenda and Order of Business of the 827th meeting
At the present Human Rights meeting, the Committee of Ministers, sitting at the level of the Ministers’ Deputies, will supervise the execution of some 3151 cases in accordance with Article 46, § 2, of the Convention for the protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Supervision is carried out in accordance with the Rules for the application of this Article adopted by the Deputies on 11 January 2001[1]. The Directorate General of Human Rights (Department for the execution of the judgments of the Court) and the Secretariat of the Committee of Ministers provide advice and assistance to the Deputies in the fulfilment of their functions under the Convention. Information and communications relating to the cases should be addressed to these departments.
Below follows a short comparative survey of the meeting (the information on the nature of the cases in the different sections is described after the table):
Meetings |
||||||||||||||
Sections |
827 |
819 |
810 |
803 |
798 |
792 |
783 |
775 |
764 |
760 |
757 |
|||
General Questions |
- |
- |
- |
1689 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
||||||
1.1 |
8 |
2 |
12 |
0 |
11 |
6 |
3 |
4 |
15 |
4 |
5 |
|||
1.2 |
2 |
0 |
6 |
11 |
36 |
26 |
1 |
4 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
|||
1.3 |
18 |
4 |
11 |
4 |
8 |
7 |
8 |
3 |
20 |
1 |
3 |
|||
1.4 |
44 |
10 |
36 |
25 |
2 |
8 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
3 |
2 |
|||
2 |
52 |
108 |
154 |
277 |
142 |
213 |
83 |
115 |
92 |
156 |
104 |
|||
3.1.a |
546 |
677 |
638 |
568 |
536 |
418 |
388 |
390 |
314 |
- |
254 |
|||
3.1.b |
129 |
110 |
89 |
116 |
70 |
58 |
54 |
41 |
169 |
- |
166 |
|||
3.1.c |
39 |
38 |
39 |
36 |
36 |
34 |
36 |
34 |
31 |
- |
9 |
|||
3.2 |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
2 |
- |
- |
7 |
0 |
- |
10 |
|||
4.1 |
6 |
15 |
17 |
15 |
8 |
5 |
13 |
36 |
15 |
- |
15 |
|||
4.2 |
78 |
116 |
112 |
91 |
78 |
82 |
65 |
139 |
52 |
22 |
142 |
|||
4.3 |
2174 |
2155 |
5 |
71 |
72 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
1463 |
19 |
19 |
|||
5.1 |
25 |
32 |
21 |
13 |
12 |
17 |
18 |
17 |
21 |
32 |
29 |
|||
5.2 |
0 |
1 |
- |
0 |
0 |
- |
- |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|||
5.3 |
5 |
11 |
7 |
16 |
3 |
1 |
10 |
7 |
14 |
8 |
7 |
|||
5.4 |
0 |
0 |
- |
0 |
0 |
- |
- |
0 |
0 |
- |
- |
|||
6 |
406 |
377 |
318 |
351 |
324 |
317 |
336 |
299 |
173 |
123 |
98 |
|||
Total of the cases on the Agenda[2] |
3151 |
3186 |
1456 |
1595 |
1340 |
1196 |
2725 |
1107 |
2373 |
372 |
866 |
|||
Total of final resolutions submitted |
72 |
16 |
65 |
40 |
57 |
47 |
29 |
19 |
45 |
11 |
12 |
|||
Total of new cases |
52 |
108 |
154 |
277 |
142 |
213 |
83 |
115 |
92 |
156 |
104 |
|||
Total of pending cases |
3370 |
3327 |
3276 |
3187 |
2964 |
2958 |
2649 |
2624 |
2531 |
2482 |
2555 |
|||
SECTION 1 – FINAL RESOLUTIONS
In the cases appearing under this heading the Deputies are invited to adopt draft resolutions putting an end to the supervision of execution carried out pursuant to Article 46§2 of the Convention (or former Articles 32[3] and 54 for cases decided before the entry into force of Protocol N° 11).
In these cases the Court (or the Committee) has either found a violation of the Convention or struck the case out of the list on the basis of undertakings made by the parties (for example in the case of friendly settlements – see Article 39 of the Convention and Rule 44 of the Rules of Court).
In all the cases, the Deputies have provisionally found, with the assistance of the Directorate General of Human Rights, that the required execution measures have been taken. The relevant information for each case has been summarised in a draft final resolution presented in Addendum 1. To facilitate examination, the cases are grouped as follows:
Sub-section 1.1. - Leading cases
In these leading cases the measures adopted aim at preventing new violations of the Convention (legislative or regulatory measures, changes of case-law, mere publication in those states where the Convention and the Court’s judgments are given direct effect, administrative measures or other measures) and/or at redressing adequately the individual situation of the applicant (among the measures which may be relevant mention may be made of reopening of proceedings, striking out a conviction from criminal records, granting a residence permit, etc.)
Sub-section 1.2 – Cases concerning problems already solved
This sub-section comprises cases which do not raise problems as regards the applicant’s individual situation, but which concern general problems which have already been solved in the context of similar earlier cases.
Sub-section 1.3 – Cases not involving general or individual measures
Contains cases which do not raise problems of a general or individual character. In these cases the mere dissemination of the judgment to the authorities directly concerned is considered sufficient.
Sub-section 1.4 – Friendly settlements and problems of a general character
This new sub-section groups friendly settlements relating to complaints concerning general problems already under examination by the Deputies in the context of other leading cases in which violations have been established.
No discussion of cases in Section 1 is envisaged since the examination of the different execution questions has already been carried out by the Deputies in the course of earlier meetings.
SECTION 2 – NEW CASES
Under this heading, the Deputies are called upon to conduct a first examination of the execution of the new final judgments delivered by the Court (Article 44 §§ 1 and 2 of the Convention) finding violations of the Convention. The Deputies also supervise the execution of judgments striking cases out of the Court’s list (friendly settlements, non-pursuit of the application, or a solution to the dispute) and which contain specific undertakings (Article 39 of the Convention and Article 44 of the Rules of Court).
The examination of new cases is in general resumed after the expiry of the 3-month time-limit normally imparted by the Court for the payment of the just satisfaction.
In those cases where all execution measures have already been taken before this first examination, a draft final resolution summarising the relevant information could be submitted for adoption. Such draft resolutions appear in Addendum 2.
Discussion is envisaged mainly for cases which raise questions of individual measures or new general measures.
Dissemination of the judgments to all the authorities involved has been requested in all these cases.
SECTION 3 – JUST SATISFACTION
In these cases the Deputies are called upon to supervise the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court and, where required, of any default interest owed.
The section also presents the last cases in which the Deputies, in accordance with former Article 32§2 of the Convention, are called upon to decide on the question of just satisfaction on the basis of proposals submitted by the former European Commission of Human Rights or by the Committee of Special Advisors set up by Resolutions DH(99)681 and (2000)138 (see also decision 692/4.4 from December 1999).
Sub-section 3.1 – control of payment:
3.1.a: Supervisionof the payment of the capital sum of the just satisfaction as well as, where due, of default interest, in cases where the deadline for payment expired less than 6 months ago.
Delegations are invited to submit written confirmation of payment to the Directorate General of Human Rights (Service for the execution of the judgments).
3.1.b: Supervisionof the payment of the capital sum of the just satisfaction in cases where the deadline for payment expired more than 6 months ago.
3.1.c: Examination of special payment problems (for example the disappearance of the applicant, disputes regarding the exact amount paid as a result of exchange rate problems or administrative fees).
The further examination of the cases in sub-sections 3.1 a - c depends on the information received.
Sub-section 3.2 – Decisions on just satisfaction
The Deputies may be are called upon to take a decision on just satisfaction pursuant to former Article 32. The details of the cases are found either in a table presented under this sub-section, or, if the case is complex, in Addendum 3 II.
The examination of such cases will be resumed after the expiry of the 3 months time-limit set for payment.
SECTION 4 – CASES RAISING SPECIAL QUESTIONS
(individual measures, measures not yet defined or special problems)
The cases which appear under this heading require special attention to the extent that they either raise problems regarding the individual situation of the applicant, or concern problems in respect of which the necessary execution measures have not yet been defined, or raise other special problems (for example on account of the magnitude of the problems raised or delays in the adoption of the necessary execution measures).
Sub-section 4.1 – Supervision of individual measures only
This sub-section groups together cases in which the Deputies will exclusively examine the measures taken or to be taken in order to put an end to the violation found and/or remedy its consequences as far as the applicant’s individual situation is concerned – where the just satisfaction awarded by the Court has not done so.
Sub-section 4.2 - Individual measures and/or general problems
This heading presents both cases involving payment problems combined with general problems and cases in which measures have not yet been defined. For supervision of individual measures, see sub-section 4.1 above; for supervision of payment, subsection 3.1.c and for general measures, section 5 below.
Sub-section 4.3 – Special problems
This title groups together complex cases raising special problems.
Supplementary information relating to the cases under this heading may, where necessary, be found in Addendum 4.
As long as individual measures are outstanding cases are examined at each Human Rights meeting, unless the Deputies decide otherwise. Examination of other issues is decided upon on a case-by-case basis.
SECTION 5 – SUPERVISION OF GENERAL MEASURES ALREADY ANNOUNCED
In these cases the Deputies are called upon to supervise the progress made in adopting measures of a general character defined at the national level and to ensure that these measures are apt to prevent new violations similar to those found by the Court. Cases are grouped together according to the nature of the main reforms envisaged.
In complex cases which require the adoption of several kinds of measures, cases are placed in the sub-section which corresponds to the main measures remaining to be adopted. A case may thus, for example, pass from sub-section 5.1 to sub-section 5.4 if the legislative changes required are rapidly adopted, whereas the implementation of the practical measures required turn out to take more time.
Sub-section 5.1 – Legislative and/or regulatory changes
In the cases in this group, the Deputies are mainly waiting for changes of legislation or of government regulations aiming at preventing new similar violations. Delegations of respondent States will thus furnish information about the content of draft legislation or regulations and on the procedure for their adoption.
Sub-section 5.2 – Changes of courts’ case-law or of administrative practice
This heading presents cases in which the Deputies are waiting for evidence (in the form of copies of judgments or decisions, statistics, etc.) of a change of the domestic courts’ case-law or of administrative practice, where such a change cannot, for one reason or another, be presumed solely on the basis of the publication or dissemination of the judgment (cf. the next sub-section).
Sub-section 5.3 – Publication / dissemination
This title encompasses in particular cases in which a change of court case-law or of administrative practice may be presumed, on the basis of evidence of the direct effect accorded to the Court’s judgments in general, as a result of simply publishing or disseminating the judgment in the case at issue, where necessary in translation into the national language. It may also concern other types of cases presenting a broader interest, such as those which imply important indications regarding the scope of the rights guaranteed by the Convention. In all these cases, the Deputies are normally waiting for details regarding the publication or dissemination carried out.
The Deputies are invited to present all relevant information in writing to the Directorate General of Human Rights (Service for the execution of the judgments of the Court).
Sub-section 5.4 – Other measures
This sub-section includes cases which primarily imply other types of general measures, for example practical measures such as the construction of prison facilities, the recruitment of judges, police training, etc.
Where necessary, supplementary information with respect to the cases in this section will be presented in Addendum 5.
Examination of these cases is normally resumed within 6 months’ time.
SECTION 6 – CASES WAITING FOR THE PRESENTATION OF A DRAFT RESOLUTION
In these cases, the draft resolutions (prepared in collaboration with the Delegation concerned in cases raising questions of individual measures or new problems of a general character) putting and end to the examination of the case are not yet available at the time of issuing the annotated agenda and order of business.
If available in time for the meeting, drafts could be distributed separately.
Examination is in principle be resumed at the next Human Rights meeting.
a. Adoption of the Annotated Agenda and Order of Business
Action
The Deputies are invited to adopt the present annotated agenda and order of business.
b. State of ratification by member States of the European Agreement relating to persons participating in proceedings of the European Court of Human Rights, the Sixth Protocol to the General Agreement on privileges and immunities of the Council of Europe and Protocols No. 12 and No. 13 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
Action
The Deputies are invited to provide information on the state of signature and ratification of these four texts. Tables showing the current state of signature and ratification appear in Addendum General Questions.
c. Preparation of the next meeting (834th (9-10 April 2003)) see page 102
d. Application of default interest in the supervision of the execution of the terms of friendly settlements
Addendum General Questions
Action
The Deputies are invited to resume consideration of this item, in the light of the debate held at the 819th meeting.
(Addendum 1)
Action
The Deputies are invited to adopt the resolutions putting and end to the examination of the following cases as they appear in Addendum 1.
SUB-SECTION 1.1 – LEADING CASES
- 1 case against Austria
H46-1 35115 Riepan, judgment of 14/11/00, final on 14/02/01
- 3 cases against Germany
H46-2677 23541 Garcia Alva, judgment of 13/02/01
H46-2678 24479 Lietzow, judgment of 13/02/01
H46-2679 25116 Schöps, judgment of 13/02/01
- 3 cases against Greece
H46-3 33170 Biba, judgment of 26/09/00, final on 26/12/00
H46-4 38194 Karakasis, judgment of 17/10/00, final on 17/01/01
H32-5 30175 S.A. « Avis Entreprises Hôtelières Touristiques and Industrielles Rurales »
- 1 case against Ireland
H46-6 33267 Croke, judgment of 21/12/00, final on 21/03/01 - Friendly settlement
SUB-SECTION 1.2 – CASES CONCERNING PROBLEMS ALREADY SOLVED
- 2 cases against the United Kingdom
H46-8 29545 Devlin, judgment of 30/10/01, final on 30/01/02
H46-9 35685 Mills, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01
SUB-SECTION 1.3 – CASES NOT INVOLVING GENERAL OR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES
- 1 case against Cyprus
H46-10 50516 Georgiadis, judgment of 14/05/2002, final on 14/08/2002
- 4 cases against France
H46-11 41333 Brochu, judgment of 12/06/01, final on 12/09/01
H46-12 43713 Joly, judgment of 27/03/01, final on 27/06/01
H46-13 46693 Chapus, judgment of 24/10/00, final on 24/01/01
H46-14 42406 Vallar, judgment of 19/03/02, final on 19/06/02
- 1 case against Greece
H46-15 39442 Société Anonyme Sotiris and Nikos Koutras Attee, judgment of 16/11/00,
final on 16/02/01
- 1 case against Italy
H46-16 29569 Buscemi, judgment of 16/09/99
- 10 cases against Portugal
H46-17 37010 Conde, judgment of 23/03/00, final on 23/06/00
H46-18 47459 Fernandes João, judgment of 18/04/2002, final on 18/07/2002
H46-19 36668 Fertiladour S.A., judgment of 18/05/00, final on 18/08/00
H46-20 42918 Nascimento, judgment of 27/09/01, final on 27/12/01
H46-21 46462 Rego Chaves Fernandes, judgment of 21/03/2002, final on 21/06/2002
H46-2830 35593 Galinho Carvalho Matos, judgment of 23/11/99, final on 23/02/00
H46-2831 46464 Vaz Da Silva Girão, judgment of 21/03/2002, final on 21/06/2002
H46-2832 45725 Malveiro, judgment of 14/03/02, final on 12/06/02
H46-2833 45560 Guerreiro, judgment of 31/01/02, final on 30/04/02
H46-2834 42636 Bento Da Mota, judgment of 28/06/01, final on 28/09/01
- 1 case against Switzerland
H32-22 26452 D’Amico Heidi and Salvatore
SUB-SECTION 1.4 – FRIENDLY SETTLEMENTS AND PROBLEMS OF A GENERAL CHARACTER
- 1 case against Austria
H46-23 32097 Biegler Bau GesmbH, judgment of 11/07/2002 - Friendly settlement
- 1 case against Croatia
H46-24 53227 Majstorović, judgment of 06/06/2002 - Friendly settlement
- 3 cases against Greece
H46-25 53051 Livanos, judgment of 16/05/02 - Friendly settlement
H46-26 50529 Teka Ltd, judgment of 26/06/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46-27 49222 Tiburzi, judgment of 25/10/01 – Friendly settlement
- 29 cases against Italy
H46-28 44968 Amato Del Re, judgment of 07/05/02, Friendly settlement
H46-29 35797 Arrivabene, judgment of 07/05/02, Friendly settlement
H46-30 35795 Ferrari Barbara, judgment of 07/05/02, Friendly settlement
H46-31 42609 Fusco Fabrizio, judgment of 07/05/02, Friendly settlement
H46-32 42444 O.L.B., judgment of 13/06/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46-33 40037 S.B., judgment of 13/06/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46-34 40537 T., judgment of 13/06/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46-35 44864 V.L. and others, judgment of 07/05/02, Friendly settlement
H46-36 32671 B. and F., judgment of 21/02/02 – Friendly settlement
H46-37 32541 Celona, judgment of 21/02/02 – Friendly settlement
H46-38 31605 Colucci, judgment of 21/02/02 – Friendly settlement
H46-39 33967 De Filippis, judgment of 21/02/02 – Friendly settlement
H46-40 31480 Guglielmi II, judgment of 21/02/02 – Friendly settlement
H46-41 37509 Pané P. and A., judgment of 21/02/02 – Friendly settlement
H46-42 31525 Pezza, judgment of 21/02/02 – Friendly settlement
H46-43 39716 Stoppini, judgment of 21/02/02 – Friendly settlement
H46-44 38656 Tiberio, judgment of 21/02/02 – Friendly settlement
H46-45 30968 Barone Mario, judgment of 04/10/01 - Friendly settlement
H46-46 32645 Castello, judgment of 04/10/01- Friendly settlement
H46-47 32404 Girolami Zurla, judgment of 04/10/01 - Friendly settlement
H46-48 31916 Immobiliare Anba, judgment of 04/10/01 - Friendly settlement
H46-49 31922 Micucci, judgment of 04/10/01 - Friendly settlement
H46-50 33831 Musiani Dagnini, judgment of 04/10/01- Friendly settlement
H46-51 31929 Pini and Bini, judgment of 04/10/01 - Friendly settlement
H46-52 31927 Serlenga, judgment of 04/10/01 - Friendly settlement
H46-53 32650 Sit s.r.l., judgment of 04/10/01- Friendly settlement
H46-54 32648 Tentori Montalto, judgment of 04/10/01- Friendly settlement
H46-55 37007 Pittini, judgment of 18/07/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46-56 36010 Venturi, judgment of 18/07/2002 - Friendly settlement
- 1 case against the Netherlands
H46-57 58964 K.K.C., judgment of 21/12/01 – Friendly settlement
- 1 case against Poland
H46-58 31387 Kliniecki, judgment of 21/12/00, final on 21/03/01 – Friendly settlement
Sub-section 1.4
- 8 cases against Portugal
H46-59 48959 Azevedo Moreira, judgment of 30/05/02 - Friendly settlement
H46-60 46772 Baptista Do Rosàrio, judgment of 04/04/02 – Friendly settlement
H46-61 45648 Caldeira and Gomes Faria, judgment of 14/02/02 – Friendly settlement
H46-62 48960 Conceição Fernandes, judgment of 20/12/01 – Friendly settlement
H46-63 47584 Martos Mellado Ribeiro, judgment of 30/05/02 - Friendly settlement
H46-64 52772 Pereira Palmeira and Sales Palmeira, judgment of 04/07/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46-65 46143 Sociedade Panificadora Bombarralense Lda., judgment of 14/02/02 –
Friendly settlement
H46-66 48526 Viana Montenegro Carneiro, judgment of 30/05/02 - Friendly settlement
Action
The Deputies are invited to procede to the first examination, under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the ECHR, of the following new judgments, delivered by the European Court of Human Rights (for further information, see the text of the judgments, http://www.echr.coe.int).
The Deputies are invited to resume consideration of these cases after expiry of the time-limit set for payment or according to the specificity of the cases.
PAYMENT OF JUST SATISFACTION
In all the new cases in which States should pay just satisfaction as ordered by the Court or as agreed in a friendly settlement, the authorities of the respondent State are invited to provide the Secretariat, in writing, with confirmations of payment.
INDIVIDUAL AND/OR GENERAL MEASURES
As regards any other execution measures which may be called for in the light of the conclusions of the Court, the authorities of the respondent State are invited, on a preliminary basis, to provide the Secretariat, in writing, with information on the measures mentioned after each case. The possible necessity to take other measures than those mentioned could nevertheless be addressed at the meeting.
Dissemination of the judgments to all the authorities involved is requested in all cases and delegations are invited to provide the written confirmation of this dissemination.
In all these cases, just satisfaction or compensation agreed under a friendly settlement has been awarded to the applicants except in the following case: Sovtransavto Holding (reserved).
Section 2
- 3 cases against Austria
H46-67 33505 H.E., judgment of 11/07/2002, final on 06/11/2002[4]
The case concerns the excessive length of certain civil proceedings (violation of Article 6§1). The proceedings started on 28/06/1985 and ended on 24/05/1996 (almost 10 years and 11 months).
*H46-68 37093 Informationsverein Lentia, judgment of 28/11/2002 - Friendly settlement
The case concerns the fact that the applicant company was unable to obtain radio and television broadcasting licences, despite a judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in this respect three years earlier, until 1/08/1996. On that date a judgment of the Constitutional Court liberalising the creation of radio and television stations and the new Act on cable and satellite broadcasting took effect (complaint under Article 10).
Following the European Court’s judgment of 24/11/93, the Committee of Ministers adopted Final Resolution (DH(98)142) summarising the measures taken by the Austrian authorities to avoid repetition of the violation found.
*H46-69 34994 Walter, judgment of 28/11/2002 - Friendly settlement
The case concerns the applicant’s complaint concerning a breach of his right of access to a court in the context of proceedings he sought to bring under Austrian media law. The applicant, who was in prison at the material time, maintained that he had been prevented from lodging an application to enforce the exercise of his right of reply to a press article in time because of an alleged delay by the prison authorities in posting a letter (complaint under Article 6§1).
- 1 case against Belgium
H46-70 37370 Stratégies and Communications and Dumoulin, judgment of 15/07/2002,
final on 15/10/2002
The case concerns the excessive length of certain criminal proceedings which began on 24/04/1996, when the searches were carried out at the company’s head office and the applicant’s home and were still pending (after 6 years and 2 months) when the European Court rendered its judgment (violation of Article 6§1).
The case also concerns the absence of an effective remedy in this respect (violation of article 13). In this context, the European Court noted that the law of 12 March 1998 amending Article 136 of the Criminal Investigation Code entered into force on 2 October 1998. This law introduced a remedy under domestic law making it possible to complain about the length of a criminal investigation. However, the Court noted that Article 136 of the Criminal Investigation Code raised issues in domestic law which had not yet been resolved. Consequently, the Court found that Article 136 had not acquired sufficient legal certainty to constitute a remedy under the terms of Article 13 of the Convention.
Possible individual and/or general measures: accelerate the proceedings; other measure (s) to be discussed at the meeting.
- 1 case against Cyprus
H46-71 51591 Markass Car Hide Ltd, judgment of 02/07/2002, final on 06/11/2002[5]
This case concerns the excessive length of certain civil proceedings (violation of Article 6§1). Proceedings started on 05/05/1998 and finished on 11/05/2000 (2 years and 6 days).
Section 2
- 2 cases against Croatia
H46-72 62912 Benzan, judgment of 08/11/2002 - Friendly settlement
The case concerns the applicant’s complaints that he had suffered inhuman and degrading treatment on account of the conditions under which he was detained in the B wing of the Lepoglava State Prison which amounted to degrading treatment of the applicant (complaint under Article 3) and that that he had no remedy in this respect (complaint under Article 13). The applicant also complained of a violation of his right to respect of his correspondence in that he was prevented from contacting his lawyer (complaint under Article 8).
In June 2002 the applicant was moved to another cell in one of the renovated wings of the above-mentioned prison (see § 15 of the judgment). According to the friendly settlement concluded, the Croatian Government, in addition to payment of compensation, undertakes to renovate the B Wing of the Lepoglava State Prison before the end of September 2003.
Possible individual and/or general measures: publication and dissemination of the judgment of the European Court to prison authorities; other measure(s) to be discussed at the meeting.
H46-73 56773 Rajčević, judgment of 23/07/2002, final on 06/11/2002[6]
The case concerns the excessive length of certain civil proceedings (violation of Article 6§1). The proceedings started on 18/09/1992. However, the period which falls within the Court’s jurisdiction began on 06/11/1997, once the Convention had entered into force in respect of Croatia. The proceedings were concluded on 06/02/2002 (four years and three months).
- 4 cases against France
H46-74 38748 Immeubles Groupe Kosser, judgment of 21/03/2002, final on 21/06/2002
The case concerns an infringement of the applicant company’s right to a fair trial on account of the Government Commissioner’s presence in the deliberations of the trial bench in proceedings before the Conseil d’Etat (violation of Article 6§1).
The case presents similarities to the Kress case of 07/06/2001 – see Sections 3.a and 4.2 of this document.
H46-75 54210 Papon, judgment of 25/07/2002, final on 25/10/2002
The case concerns the violation of the applicant’s right of access to a court, in that the Cour de cassation found that his appeal on a point of law had lapsed, pursuant to Article 583 of the Code of Criminal Procedure which was applicable at that time, because he had not surrendered to custody nor obtained dispensation from the obligation to do so. The European Court considered that making the admissibility of an appeal to the Cour de cassation conditional on the appellant’s surrendering to custody undermined his right of access to the juge de cassation and thus his right to a fair trial (violation of Article 6§1). This case is similar to the Khalfaoui case, which is in Section 6 as a result of measures taken, in particular the abrogation of Article 583 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Possible individual measure: re-opening of the appeal on basis of Articles 626-1 to 626-7 of the Code of Criminal Procedure introduced by Law No.2000-516 of 15 June 2000.
Section 2
H46-76 42400 Seguin, judgment of 16/04/2002, final on 06/11/2002[7]
The case concerns the excessive length of two sets of proceedings before administrative and civil courts, concerning a redundancy for economic reasons, ended by a judgment of the Court of Cassation on 21/01/1998 (12 years and 9 months).
Possible individual or general measures: publication of the judgment of the European Court.
H46-77 41358 Desmots, judgment of 02/07/2002, final on 06/11/2002[8]
The case concerns the excessive length of proceedings before the administrative courts including the Conseil d’Etat: 8 years and 6 months (violation of Article 6§1).
It presents similarities to the cases of Beaume Marty & others which are in the process of being closed following the adoption of measures (See Section 6 of this document).
Possible individual or general measures: publication of the judgment of the European Court.
- 10 cases against Italy
H46-78 57574+ Sulejmanovic and others and Sejdovic and Sulejmanovic, judgment of 08/11/2002 - Friendly settlement
The case concerns the applicants’ expulsion to Bosnia-Herzegovina in March 2000 (complaints under Articles 3, 8 and 13 of the Convention and under Article 4 of Protocol No. 4 to the Convention).
According to the friendly settlement reached, the Italian Government has undertaken, in addition to the payment of certain sums to the applicants and to their lawyer, to revoke the deportation orders, to permit the applicants to enter Italy with their families and to issue them with residence permits on humanitarian grounds. The Government has further undertaken to arrange for the children of school age to be allowed to attend school and for a sick child to receive the medical attention she needs.
Individual measures: information is expected on the compliance with the terms of the friendly settlement.
H46-79 36534 Osu, judgment of 11/07/2002, final on 11/10/2002
The case concerns the fact that the applicant could not challenge his conviction in absentia in 1989, his appeal having been rejected in 1996 as time-barred. The European Court found that the failure by the Italian Court of Cassation to apply Section 1 of Law 747/69 (concerning the suspension of time-limits in summer) without reason deprived the applicant of his right to access to a court (violation of Article 6§1).
The applicant was sentenced to seven years’ imprisonment and expelled in 1997 to the United Kingdom.
Possible individual and/or general measures: to be discussed at the meeting.
Section 2
- 8 cases concerning the failure to enforce judicial eviction orders against tenants
*H46-80 34742 A.M.M., judgment of 28/11/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46-81 36112 C. Srl, judgment of 07/11/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46-82 38043 Ciccone, judgment of 07/11/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46-83 33115 Fabbrini, judgment of 15/11/2002 - Friendly settlement
*H46-84 39451 Fiorentini Vizzini, judgment of 19/12/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46-85 35001 Franceschetti, judgment of 07/11/2002 - Friendly settlement
*H46-86 57206 Virgulti, judgment of 28/11/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46-87 36734 Visca, judgment of 07/11/2002 - Friendly settlement
These cases concern the prolonged impossibility for the applicants to obtain the assistance of the police in order to implement judicial decisions ordering their tenants’ eviction, owing to the implementation of legislation providing for the suspension or staggering of evictions (complaints under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 and Article 6§1).
These cases are similar to the case of Immobiliare Saffi, judgment of 28/07/99, under Section 4.2 of this document.
- 2 cases against Poland
H46-88 55106 Górka, judgment of 05/11/2002 - Friendly settlement
The case concerns the length of certain civil proceedings (complaint under Article 6§1).
H46-89 71891 Hałka and others, judgment of 02/07/2002, final on 02/10/2002
The case concerns the excessive length of civil proceedings (7 years and 3 months) relating to a claim for compensation for persecution suffered under the communist regime (violation of Article 6§1).
This case is similar to that of Kurzac against Poland (judgment of 22/02/2001).
Under the 1991 law, only the Warsaw Regional Court was competent to examine such claims. Legislative amendments were introduced in 1995 so that all regional courts became competent to examine claims for annulment of convictions and compensation for persecution under the communist regime. However, claims submitted before that date remain with the Warsaw Regional Court where a special division was created in order to deal with this type of claims.
Possible individual and/or general measures: Statistics are awaited concerning the time taken to deal with similar cases before the Warsaw regional Court.
- 2 cases against Portugal
H46-90 48187 Rosa Marques and others, judgment of 25/07/2002, final on 25/10/2002
This case concerns the excessive length of certain civil proceedings (violation of Article 6§1). Proceedings started on 21 August 1990 and finished on 9 November 1998 (eight years and two months).
*H46-91 54483 Lógica - Móveis de Organização, Lda, judgment of 19/12/2002 – Friendly
settlement
The case concerns the excessive length of certain criminal proceedings combined with a civil action for damages (complaints under Article 6§1).
Section 2
- 1 case against Romania
H46-92 33358 Oprea and others, judgment of 16/07/2002, final on 16/10/2002
The case concerns the Supreme Court’s annulment of a final court decision delivered at first instance establishing the validity of the applicants' titles to real estate. The Supreme Court intervened following application for nullity lodged by the Procurator General on the ground of Article 330 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which allowed him at any moment to challenge final court decisions. The European Court considered that by acting in this way, the Supreme Court had failed to acknowledge the security of legal transactions and accordingly violated the applicants’ right to a fair trial. It also took the view that the Supreme Court had infringed the applicants’ right of access to a tribunal in that it had not recognised courts’ jurisdiction over disputes concerning recovery of real estate (violations of Article 6§1). Finally the European Court found that the Supreme Court’s decision had violated the applicants’ right to respect for their possessions (violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1).
The case present similarities to that of Brumarescu against Romania (judgments of 23/01/01 and 11/05/01) which will be examined at the 834th meeting (April 2003) for supervision of general measures.
- 2 cases against the Slovak Republic
H46-93 41263 Konček, judgment of 26/11/2002 - Friendly settlement
The case concerns first an administrative decision withdrawing the applicant’s driving licence following an accident. In this context, the applicant complained of the unfairness and the length of this procedure (complaint under Article 6§1) and the absence of an effective remedy (complaint under Article 13). Secondly, the case concerns the length of criminal proceedings subsequently brought against the applicant for having caused a road accident while drunk (complaint under Article 6§1).
H46-94 41384 Varga, judgment of 26/11/2002 - Friendly settlement
The case concerns the applicant’s complaint regarding the length of certain criminal proceedings and the absence of an effective remedy in this regard (complaint under Article 6§1).
- 1 case against Spain
H46-95 45238 Perote Pellon, judgment of 25/07/2002, final on 25/10/2002
The case concerns the lack of objective impartiality of a military court in that two of the judges sitting on the court which judged the applicant, the president and the rapporteur, had been involved in several investigatory procedures including the confirmation of the applicant’s indictment at appeal, the extension of his detention on remand and the rejection of his súplica appeal against this decision (violation of Article 6§1).
A chamber of the central military court, in a judgment dated 09/07/1997, sentenced the applicant to 7 years’ imprisonment for the crime of revealing secrets or information concerning national security or defence and cashiered him from the army. On 15/04/1999 he was released on parole having served three quarters of his sentence.
Possible individual and/or general measures: publication of the judgment of the European Court; other measures to be discussed at the meeting.
Section 2
- 21 cases against Turkey
H46-96 36971 Kuray, judgment of 26/11/2002 - Friendly settlement
The case concerns the applicant’s complaint concerning his prolonged detention (11 days) in police custody in 1996 before being brought before a magistrate (complaint under Article 5 § 3).
This case presents similarities to that of Sakık and others against Turkey (judgment of 26/11/1997) which was closed by a final resolution, ResDH(2002)110, following the adoption of general measures by the Turkish authorities.
H46-97 25144+ Sadak Selim and others, judgment of 11/06/2002, final on 06/11/2002[9]
The case concerns the automatic lapse of the applicants’ parliamentary mandates following the dissolution of their political party (DEP) by the Constitutional Court’s judgment of 16/06/1994 on the grounds of comments made abroad by the former chairman of the party and a written statement issued by its central committee (violation of Article 3 of Protocol No.1). The European Court considered that the definitive dissolution of the DEP with immediate effect and the automatic lapse of the applicants’ parliamentary mandates, was a disproportionate sanction incompatible with the very essence of the right to be elected. After constitutional amendments in 1995, only the parliamentarian whose words or deeds has caused the dissolution of a political party, loses his or her mandate (see § 37 of the judgment). The impact of these constitutional amendments on the applicants’ case remains to be clarified.
Possible individual and/or general measures: publication of the judgment; other measure(s) to be discussed at the meeting.
H46-98 27209+ Kiliç Özcan, judgment of 26/11/2002 - Friendly settlement
This case concerns the applicant’s complaints concerning a violation of his freedom of expression on account of his convictions between 1993 and 1994 by State Security Courts following the publication of certain articles and the State Security Courts’ lack of independence and impartiality (complaints under Articles 10 and 6§1).
The applicant was imprisoned and sentenced to pay fines for separatist propaganda and for defending illegal organisations under Article 16 of the Press Act No. 5680 and Articles 6 and 8 of the Anti-Terror Law No. 3713.
According to the friendly settlement, the Turkish Government undertook to pay a sum of money to the applicant and to implement all necessary reform of domestic law and practice in order to bring the Turkish Law into conformity with the requirements of the Convention in the area of freedom of expression. Furthermore, the government undertook to adopt the individual measures set out in Interim Resolution ResDH(2001)106 in order rapidly and fully to erase the consequences of the applicant’s convictions. This case is comparable to the “freedom of expression” cases against Turkey under Section 4.2 of this annotated agenda and order of business.
H46-99 27602 Ekinci Ülkü, judgment of 16/07/2002, final on 16/10/2002
The case relates to killing of the applicant's husband in February 1994 near Ankara and to the authorities' failure to conduct an adequate and effective investigation into the circumstances surrounding his death (violations of Articles 2 and 13).
Individual measures: The applicant argued that the above finding of violations imposes on the respondent State a legal obligation to carry out a genuine and effective investigation into the circumstances of her husband's murder. The Court stated that it was for Turkey to take all measures to put an end to the violations and as far as possible restore the applicant to his rights and for the Committee of Ministers, acting under Article 46, to supervise their execution (§179 of the judgment).
Section 2
General measures: In its Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98 the Committee took stock of the progress and pointed out a number of outstanding problems in the execution of some 40 judgments finding violations of the Convention by the Turkish security forces. As a result, Turkey has been invited to adopt further general measures to comply with these judgments. The Committee will be invited to resume consideration of these issues at the 834th meeting (9-10 April 2003).
H46-100 25656 Orhan Salih, judgment of 18/06/2002, final on 06/11/2002[10]
The case relates to the unacknowledged detention of the applicant's son and two brothers, in May 1994 in South-East Turkey, in the total absence of fundamental procedural safeguards (violation of Article 5) and to their disappearance and presumed death under the responsibility of the security forces (violations of Article 2 in respect of the three disappeared persons and of Article 3 in respect of the applicant). The case also concerns the destruction by the security forces of the applicant's and his relatives' homes and property (violations of Articles 8 and/or Article 1 of Protocol No. 1) and the lack of effective domestic remedies in respect of the applicant's complaints (violations of Article 2 due to serious deficiencies of the investigation into the applicant's relatives' disappearance and of Article 13, combined with Articles 2, 3, 5, and 8 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1). The Court also found that the Turkish authorities hindered the exercise of the applicant's right to individual petition under the Convention (violation of Article 34).
Individual measures: The applicant asked the Court to oblige the respondent Government to undertake a serious investigation into the fate of the disappeared relatives of the applicant and to reconstruct their houses and the village of Caglayan so as to allow the applicant and his surviving relatives to return to their homes. The Court stated that it was for Turkey to take all measures to put an end to the violations and as far as possible restore the applicant to his rights and for the Committee of Ministers, acting under Article 46, to supervise their execution (§451 of the judgment).
General measures: In its Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98 the Committee took stock of the progress and pointed out a number of outstanding problems in the execution of some 40 judgments finding violations of the Convention by the Turkish security forces. As a result, Turkey has been invited to adopt further general measures to comply with these judgments. The Committee will be invited to resume consideration of these issues at the 834th meeting (9-10 April 2003).
- 8 Friendly settlement cases containing undertakings of the Turkish Government
H46-101 38588 Keçeci, judgment of 26/11/2002 - Friendly settlement
*H46-102 31137 Adalı, judgment of 12/12/2002 - Friendly settlement
*H46-103 31154 Şen Filiyet, judgment of 12/12/2002 - Friendly settlement
*H46-104 31153 Soğukpınar, judgment of 12/12/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46-105 36189 Yakar, judgment of 26/11/2002 - Friendly settlement
*H46-106 22280 Demir Mahmut, judgment of 05/12/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46-107 31890 Kınay M. and Kınay R., judgment of 26/11/2002 - Friendly settlement
*H46-108 31152 Yalçın Şaziment, judgment of 12/12/2002 - Friendly settlement
These cases concern in particular allegations of either ill-treatment during police custody or the killing of relatives of the applicants in the course of operations conducted by security forces or destruction of their properties between October 1988 and November 1996 in Istanbul, Diyarbakır, Ankara, Mus and Bingol (complaints under Articles 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 13, 14 and 18 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1).
According to the friendly settlements, the Turkish Government, in addition to payment of compensation, undertakes notably to issue appropriate instructions and adopt all the necessary measures – including the obligation to carry out effective investigations – to ensure that the right to life and the prohibition of such forms of ill-treatment are respected in the future. The Government also referred to the Committee of Ministers’ supervision of execution of other similar judgments.
Section 2
The complaints and the governmental undertakings in these cases present similarities with those made in a number of other friendly settlements relating to actions of the Turkish security forces, which will be re-examined at the 834th meeting (9-10 April 2003) for supervision of their implementation.
- 8 cases relating to delays by the administration in paying additional compensation for expropriation and the applicable rate of default interest against Turkey
H46-109 19660 Çalkan Dudu, judgment of 28/03/2002, final on 28/06/2002
H46-110 20140 Çelebi Mehmet n° 2, judgment of 28/03/2002, final on 28/06/2002
H46-111 68117 Denli Nesibe, judgment of 23/07/2002, final on 23/10/2002
H46-112 20144 Kartal Adile, judgment of 28/03/2002, final on 28/06/2002
H46-113 20152 Özen Mehmet, judgment of 28/03/2002, final on 28/06/2002
H46-114 20151 Öztürk Ahmet, judgment of 28/03/2002, final on 28/06/2002
H46-115 20155 Şen Aziz n° 2, judgment of 28/03/2002, final on 28/06/2002
*H46-116 26543 Çallı, judgment of 12/12/2002 - Friendly settlement
These cases concern in particular the applicants’ complaints of breaches of their right to the peaceful enjoyment of their possessions due to the administration’s delays in paying additional compensation awarded by domestic courts for expropriation of their property and due to the substantial difference between the default interest rate applicable at the time and the average rate of inflation in Turkey (violations of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1).
These cases present similarities to those of Akkuş and Aka against Turkey (judgments of 09/07/1997 and 23/09/1998) closed by Resolutions ResDH(2001)71 and ResDH(2001)70 respectively, following a legislative reform which brought the statutory rate of default interest into line with the annual rediscount rate applied by the Turkish Central Bank to short-term debts (the latter rate is fixed and permanently reviewed, taking into account particularly the country’s inflation rate).
- 1 case against Ukraine
H46-117 48553 Sovtransavto Holding, judgment of 25/07/2002, final on 06/11/2002[11]
The case concerns the failure to respect the applicant company’s right to a fair trial before an impartial and independent tribunal in respect of certain proceedings it conducted between 1997 and 2002 before the Ukrainian courts with a view to establishing the unlawfulness of domestic decisions which resulted in the depreciation of its shares in – and the ensuing loss of control over – a Ukrainian transport company (violation of Article 6§1). The main deficiencies found by the Court consist of:
- repeated attempts by the President of Ukraine to influence domestic court decisions;
- application of "protest" procedure ("application for supervision") making it possible to quash final judicial decisions without any limitations;
- the refusal by courts to examine the arguments on the merits in a public hearing and the absence of adequate motivation of judicial decisions.
The Court concluded in addition that the manner in which the impugned proceedings were conducted and concluded had also violated the applicant company's right to peaceful enjoyment of its possessions (violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1).
Possible individual or general measures: to be discussed at the meeting.
Section 2
- 1 case against the United Kingdom
H46-118 36042 Willis, judgment of 11/06/2002, final on 11/09/2002
The case particularly concerns discrimination on grounds of sex against the applicant in that as a widower, he was denied the social security benefits for widowed parents: the Widowed Mother’s Allowance and the Widow’s Payment, as these benefits were only available to women (violation of Article 14 together with Article 8 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1).
The case present similarities with the Crossland, Cornwell and Leary cases (see Resolutions ResDH(2000)81, ResDH(2002)95 and ResDH(2002)96 respectively adopted in these cases).
Action
The Deputies are invited to supervise the payment of just satisfaction in the following cases pending before the Committee of Ministers for execution supervision. The Deputies are invited to resume consideration of these cases in principle at their next Human Rights meeting.
3.a SUPERVISION OF THE PAYMENT OF THE CAPITAL SUM OF THE JUST SATISFACTION AS WELL AS, WHERE DUE, OF DEFAULT INTEREST, IN CASES WHERE THE DEADLINE FOR PAYMENT EXPIRED LESS THAN 6 MONTHS AGO
At the time of issuing the present Annotated Agenda and Order of Business, the Secretariat had not received the written confirmation of payment of just satisfaction and/or default interest in the following cases (see the table below summarising the total number of cases by States). The Representatives of the States concerned are invited to give the Secretariat written confirmation of payment of the sums awarded by the Court and/or the default interests.
- 1 case against Austria
H46-119 38275 W.F., judgment of 30/05/2002, final on 30/08/2002
- 1 case against Belgium
- Default interest to be paid
H46-120 51564 Čonka, judgment of 05/02/02, final on 05/05/02
- 33 cases against France
- Just satisfaction to be paid
H46-123 51279 Colombani and others, judgment of 25/06/2002, final on 25/09/2002
H46-124 48161 Motais de Narbonne, judgment of 02/07/2002, final on 02/10/2002
H46-125 53613 Goth, judgment of 16/05/2002, final on 16/08/2002
H46-126 32911+ Meftah, Adoud and Bosoni, judgment of 26/07/2002 - Grand Chamber
H46-127 37971 Sociétés Colas Est, judgment of 16/04/2002, final on 16/07/2002
H46-128 41376 D.M., judgment of 27/06/2002, final on 27/09/2002
H46-129 43125 Delbec Annick n° 3, judgment of 18/06/2002, final on 18/09/2002[12]
H46-130 33395 L.R., judgment of 27/06/2002, final on 27/09/2002
H46-131 39626 Granata, judgment of 19/03/02, final on 19/06/02
H46-132 38396 Karatas and Sari, judgment of 16/05/2002, final on 16/08/2002
H46-133 33424 Nouhaud and others, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002
H46-134 44952+ Van der Kar and Lissaur Van West, judgment of 19/03/02, final on 19/06/02
H46-136 51575 Baillard, judgment of 26/03/2002, final on 04/09/2002[13]
H46-137 48215 Lutz, judgment of 26/03/2002, final on 26/06/2002
H46-138 44081 Perhirin and 29 others, judgment of 14/05/2002, final on 04/09/2002[14] [15]
H46-139 56198 Société Industrielle d’Entretien and de Service (Sies), judgment of 19/03/02,
final on 19/06/02
H46-140 51179 Solana, judgment of 19/03/02, final on 04/09/2002[16]
H46-141 44797+ Etcheveste and Bidart, judgment of 21/03/2002, final on 21/06/2002
H46-142 45172 Fentati, judgment of 22/10/2002 - Friendly settlement
Section 3.a
- Default interest to be paid
H46-143 33592 Baumann, judgment of 22/05/01, final on 22/08/01
H46-144 41476 Laine, judgment of 17/01/02, final on 17/04/02
H46-145 40096 Versini, judgment of 10/07/01, final on 10/10/01
H46-146 41526 Pulvirenti, judgment of 28/11/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-147 44211 Lacombe, judgment of 07/11/00, final on 07/02/01
H46-148 39273 Vermeersch, judgment of 22/05/01, final on 22/08/01
H46-149 48167 Hababou, judgment of 26/04/01 - Friendly settlement
H32-150 39966 De Cantelar, Interim Resolution DH(2000)86
H46-151 42195 Mortier, judgment of 31/07/01, final on 31/10/01
H46-152 39594 Kress, judgment of 07/06/01 – Grand Chamber[17]
H46-153 40472 Tricard, judgment of 10/07/01, final on 10/10/01
H46-154 29731 Krombach, judgment of 13/02/01, final on 13/05/01
H46-155 47631 Lemort, judgment of 26/04/01, final on 26/04/01
H32-156 31677 Watson John, Interim Resolution DH(2000)20
- 10 cases against Greece
- Just satisfaction to be paid
H46-157 37095 Pialopoulos and others, judgments of 15/02/01, final on 27/06/02 and of 15/05/01, final on 06/11/02[18] (Article 41)[19]
*H46-158 47730 Entreprises Meton and Etep, judgment of 21/03/2002, final on 21/06/2002
- Default interest to be paid
H46-159 48392 Hatzitakis, judgment of 11/04/2002, final on 11/07/2002
H46-160 48679 AEPI S.A., judgment of 11/04/2002, final on 11/07/2002
H46-161 46356 Smokovitis and others, judgment of 11/04/2002, final on 11/07/2002
H46-162 49215 Angelopoulos, judgment of 11/04/2002, final on 11/07/2002
H46-163 46806 Sakellaropoulos Yeoryios, judgment of 11/04/2002, final on 11/07/2002
H46-164 46352 Logothetis, judgment of 12/04/01, final on 12/07/01 and judgment of 18/04/02
(Article 41), final on 18/07/02
H46-165 49282 Marinakos, judgment of 04/10/01 – Friendly settlement
H46-166 47020 Kolokitha, judgment of 07/06/01 - Friendly settlement
- 2 cases against Hungary
H46-167 42373 Bódine Bencze, judgment of 01/10/2002 – Striking-out following a Friendly
settlement
H46-168 43352 Kósa, judgment of 01/10/2002 – Striking-out follwong a Friendly settlement
Section 3.a
- 419 cases against Italy
- Just satisfaction to be paid
H46-169 36732 Pisano, judgment of 24/10/2002 – Striking-out - Grand Chamber
H46-170 33202 Beyeler, judgments of 05/01/00 (merits) and of 28/05/02 (just satisfaction)
H46-171 28724 Capitanio, judgment of 11/07/2002, final on 11/10/2002[20]
H46-172 46079 Biffoni, judgment of 24/10/2001 - Friendly settlement
H46-173 41624 Calvagno, judgment of 03/10/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46-174 31928 F. and F., judgment of 24/10/2001 - Friendly settlement
H46-175 39690 Gianotti Ricardo, judgment of 03/10/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46-176 43986 Pugliese Rosalba, judgment of 03/10/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46-177 47895 Sartorelli, judgment of 24/10/2001 - Friendly settlement
H46-178 34714 Tacchino and Scorza, judgment of 18/07/2002 - Friendly settlement
- Civil courts[21]
H46-179 56084 At.M., judgment of 07/05/02, final on 07/08/02
H46-180 41740 Diebold, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46-181 44413 Guerrera Angelo Giuseppe, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-182 47479 Mastromauro S.R.L., judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46-183 44409 Rizzo Giuseppe, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02, rectified on 09/07/02
H46-184 51664 Rodolfi, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H32-185 30423 Salini Costruttori Spa, Interim Resolution DH(99)673
H46-186 51674 V.I., judgment of 11/12/2001, final on 04/09/2002[22]
- Administrative courts[23]
H46-187 56226 Abate and Ferdinandi, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H46-188 44341 Cannone, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002
H46-189 44347 Carapella and others, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002
H46-190 44350 Cecere Domenico, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002
H46-191 56222 Centis, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H46-192 56206 Colonnello and others, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H46-193 56208 Conte and others, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H46-194 56202 Cornia, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H46-195 56224 D’Amore, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H46-196 56217 De Cesaris, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H46-197 44337 Delli Paoli, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002
H46-198 56205 Dente, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H46-199 56225 Di Pede II, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H46-200 56221 Donato, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H46-201 56212 Folletti, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H46-202 44349 Fragnito, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002
H46-203 44340 Gaudenzi, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002
H46-204 56203 Ginocchio, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H46-205 44334 Lattanzi and Cascia, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46-206 56204 Limatola, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H46-207 56207 Lugnan in Basile, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H46-208 56220 Mastropasqua, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H46-209 38594 Mereu and S. Maria Navarrese, judgment of 13/06/2002, final on 13/09/2002
H46-210 56211 Napolitano Giuseppe, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H46-211 44348 Nazzaro and others, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002
Section 3.a
H46-212 44351 Pace and others, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002
H46-213 56213 Piacenti, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H46-214 56223 Polcari, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H46-215 56219 Presel, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H46-216 56214 Ripoli I, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H46-217 56215 Ripoli II, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H46-218 56201 Sardo Salvatore, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H46-219 56218 Stabile Michele, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
- Court of Audit
H46-220 54282 Amici, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46-221 54278 Leonardi, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46-222 54312 Manna, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46-223 54319 Sportola, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
- Labour courts[24]
H46-224 51031 Aceto and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-225 51089 Armellino Francesco, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-226 52824 Belviso and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-227 52804 Bianco Pellegrino, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-228 52816 Biondi and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-229 51030 Biondo, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-230 52835 Cerbo and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-231 52801 Ciarmoli, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-232 52815 Cimmino and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-233 52807 Ciullo, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-234 52821 Colangelo Domenico, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-235 51164 Crovella, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-236 51163 D’Angelo Michele, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-237 51125 De Filippo, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-238 51027 Del Vecchio Anna Rita, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-239 51155 Della Ratta, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-240 52813 Di Meo and Masotta, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-241 52846 Di Meo Antonio, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-242 51092 Di Mezza, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-243 51156 Fasulo, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02, rectified on 12/09/2002
H46-244 51091 Ferrara Clementina, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/2002
H46-245 52843 Franco and Basile, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-246 51161 Gagliardi, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-247 52830 Giannotta and Iannella, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-248 51094 Iacobucci and Lavorgna, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-249 51170 Izzo Giovanni, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-250 52802 Lagozzino, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-251 52812 Lavorgna and Iorio, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-252 52822 Macolino, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-253 52819 Mancino, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-254 51169 Marotta Alberto, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-255 51168 Martino Alfonso, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-256 52827 Mastrocinque Mafalda, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-257 51167 Matera Tommasina, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-258 52845 Mazzarelli, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-259 52818 Meola, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-260 52840 Mongillo Mario, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-261 44428 Nardone Antonio, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
Section 3.a
H46-262 52832 Nero and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-263 51029 Ocone, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-264 51114 Paduano, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-265 52829 Pallotta, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-266 51023 Palmieri Maddalena, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02, revised judgment of
18/04/02, final on 18/07/02
H46-267 51022 Palmieri Mario Francesco, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-268 52841 Panza, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-269 52837 Pascale and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-270 52842 Pascale Elda, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-271 52826 Pascale Maria Annunziata, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-272 51162 Pengue, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-273 52808 Perna Giuseppina, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-274 52828 Petrillo and Petrucci, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-275 51025 Petrillo Gino, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-276 51024 Porto, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-277 52825 Pucella and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-278 51126 Raccio Emilia, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-279 51109 Restuccio, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-280 52820 Riccardi Vicenzina, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-281 52823 Romano and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-282 52844 Romano Rosa, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-283 52833 Santagata, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-284 51165 Santina Pelosi, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-285 40151 Sciarrotta, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46-286 52839 Tanzillo, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-287 52836 Tazza and Zullo, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-288 52810 Tazza, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-289 52809 Truocchio Edmondo, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-290 51166 Truocchio Mario, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-291 51124 Tudisco, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-292 52817 Urbano and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-293 51026 Uzzo, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-294 52811 Villari, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-295 52847 Viscuso, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-296 51028 Vitelli, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-297 52814 Zoccolillo and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-298 52800 Zuotto, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
- Criminal proceedings[25]
H46-299 38576 Barattelli Carlo, judgment of 04/07/2002, final on 04/10/2002
H46-300 41863 Boldrin Stefano, judgment of 04/07/2002, final on 04/10/2002
H46-301 37249 Casadei Roberto, judgment of 04/07/2002, final on 04/10/2002
H46-302 35991 Del Federico Alberto, judgment of 04/07/2002, final on 04/10/2002
H46-303 42619 Di Vuono Bernardo, judgment of 04/07/2002, final on 04/10/2002
H46-304 44173 Mucciacciaro Raffaele, judgment of 04/07/2002, final on 04/10/2002
H46-305 42287 Pascazi Domenico, judgment of 04/07/2002, final on 04/10/2002
H46-306 43915 Rocci Luigi, judgment of 04/07/2002, final on 04/10/2002
H46-307 42291+ Tumbarello and Titone, judgment of 04/07/2002, final on 04/10/2002
H46-308 41424 Nuvoli, judgment of 16/05/2002, final on 16/08/2002
Section 3.a
- Criminal proceedings combined with civil action for damages[26]
H46-309 46970 Contardi, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
- Default interest to be paid
H46-310 25639 F.L., judgment of 20/12/01, final on 20/03/02
H46-311 30127 Sciortino, judgment of 18/10/01, final on 27/03/02
H46-312 39676 Rojas Morales, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46-313 26772 Labita, judgment of 06/04/00, final on 06/04/00
H46-314 30882 Pellegrini Maria Grazia, judgment of 20/07/01, final on 20/10/01
H46-315 15918 Antonetto, judgment of 20/07/00, final on 20/10/00
H46-316 28168 Quadrelli, judgment of 11/01/00, final on 20/03/00
H46-317 33354 Lucà, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46-318 26161 Natoli, judgment of 09/01/01[27]
H32-319 19734 F.S. I, Interim Resolution DH(98)209
H46-321 41852 Vaccaro, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46-322 39221+ Scozzari and others, judgment of 13/07/00 – Grand Chamber
Interim Resolutions ResDH(2001)65 and ResDH(2001)151[28]
- Civil courts[29]
H46-327 44481 A.C. VII, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-328 46515 Adriani, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46-329 46964 Alpites S.P.A., judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-330 47785 Angemi, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-331 48412 Ar.M., judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02
H46-332 46958 Ardemagni and Ripa, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H32-333 39900 Artuso Paolo, Interim Resolution DH(99)569
H32-334 39137 Avallone, Interim Resolution DH(99)475
H46-335 44511 Bellagamba, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-336 40977 Beltramo, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01
H46-337 44431 Beluzzi and others, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46-338 39883 Bertozzi, judgment of 27/04/00, final on 27/04/00
H46-339 44442 Bevilacqua, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46-340 36811 Bielectric S.R.L., judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46-341 44437 Bocca, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H32-342 39121 Bolla, Interim Resolution DH(99)480
H46-343 44457 Bonelli, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-344 44436 Buffalo s.r.l., judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46-345 46534 Burghesu, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46-346 46980 C.L., judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H32-347 35292 Calandrella F., P. and 2 others, Interim Resolution DH(98)405
H46-348 39881 Capodanno, judgment of 05/04/00, final on 05/04/00
H46-349 45071 Capurro and Tosetti, judgment of 28/04/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-350 46526 Carboni, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46-351 45859 Caruso Giuseppina, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01
H46-352 45861 Cavallaro, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01
H46-353 36620 Ceriello, judgment of 26/10/99, final on 26/10/99
H46-354 46537 Cerulli and Zadra, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46-355 45869 Chiappetta, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01
H46-356 46959 Circo and others, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
Section 3.a
H46-357 44504 Citterio and Angiolillo, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-358 47779 Ciuffetti, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-359 46532 Conte Gaspare and others, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46-360 47774 Conti Giuliana, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46-361 44385 Cornaglia, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46-362 46527 Corsi, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46-363 35616 Coscia, judgment of 11/04/00, final on 11/04/00
H46-364 46538 Costantini Francesco, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46-365 44500 Cova, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-366 45880 Cultraro, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46-367 46536 D.C. IV, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46-368 44513 D’Ammassa and Frezza, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02, revised
judgment of 09/01/03, final on 09/04/03[30]
H46-369 45872 D’Annibale, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01
H46-370 40216 D’Arrigo and Garrozzo, judgment of 21/11/00, final on 21/02/01
H46-371 52921 Damiano, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H32-372 17482 D'Aquino and Petrizzi, Interim Resolution DH(96)28
H32-373 40566 De Cicco Concetta, Interim Resolution DH(98)405
H32-374 40580 De Lorenzi, Interim Resolution DH(99)588
H46-375 42520 De Simone Pasquale, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H32-376 39138 Di Fant I, Interim Resolution DH(99)488
H32-377 39139 Di Fant II, Interim Resolution DH(99)489
H46-378 46976 Di Motoli and others, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-379 46520 Dorigo Franco, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46-380 44480 E.G., judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H46-381 44519 E.M. II, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H32-382 39906 Emmebiemme S.r.l., Interim Resolution DH(99)592
H46-383 40982 Erdokovy, judgment of 01/02/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-384 46524+ F., T. and E., judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46-385 46533 F.L.S., judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46-386 39164 F.S.p.A. II, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01
H46-387 46971 F.T., judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H32-388 26012 Facciolini, Interim Resolution DH(96)648
H46-389 46968 Falconi, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-390 52972 Falzarano Carmine, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H46-391 47781 Farinosi and Barattelli, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-392 45870 Ferrazzo and others, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01
H46-393 45868 Filippello Giorgio II, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01
H32-394 38145 Focardi and Conti, Interim Resolution DH(99)287
H46-395 46965 Franceschetti and Odorico, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H32-396 38118 Fraschetti, Interim Resolution DH(99)288
H46-397 44397 G.B. IV, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46-398 37131 G.M.N., judgment of 02/11/99, final on 02/11/99
H32-399 38503 G.P. and 25 others, Interim Resolution DH(99)388
H46-400 46543 G.S. and L.M., judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46-401 47786 G.V. V, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-402 46963 Galiè, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-403 46528 Giannalia, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46-404 47773 Gianni, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46-405 45860 Giuseppe Nicola and Luciano Caruso, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01
H46-406 40968 I.F., judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01
H46-407 44418 I.P.E.A. S.R.L., judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H46-408 39116 I.R., judgment of 15/02/00, final on 15/02/00
H46-409 44447 Ianniti and others, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
Section 3.a
H46-410 46516 Il Messaggero S.a.s. II, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46-411 46517 Il Messaggero S.a.s. III, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46-412 46518 Il Messaggero S.a.s. IV, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46-413 46519 Il Messaggero S.a.s. V, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46-414 47777 Ilardi, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46-415 44508 Immobiliare Il Messaggero del geometra Antonio Iorillo, judgment of 25/10/01,
final on 25/01/02
H46-416 39894 Italiano, judgment of 15/02/00, final on 15/02/00
H46-417 46530 Iulio, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46-418 40924 L. S.r.l., judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00
H46-419 46542 Lanino, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H32-420 31341 Lazzari and Scagnoli, Interim Resolution DH(97)637
H46-421 45853 Lo Cicero, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01
H32-422 40571 Lo Sardo, Interim Resolution DH(99)606
H46-423 46523 Lonardi, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46-424 46962 Lucas International S.R.L., judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-425 44406 M. S.r.l., judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46-426 46961 Maletti, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H32-427 28725 Manzi A., B. and L., Interim Resolution DH(97)254
H46-428 44443 Marchi, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46-429 46957 Marcolongo, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-430 44517 Mari and Mangini, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-431 44422 Marzinotto, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46-432 46966 Massaro, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-433 46979 Mastrantonio Francesca, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-434 44420 Mauri, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46-435 46973 Morelli and Nerattini, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-436 44490 Murgia, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H32-437 39872 Nata, Interim Resolution DH(99)617
H46-438 46522 Nolla, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46-439 44494 O.P., judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-440 44468 P.B. V, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-441 40570 Padalino V. and G., judgment of 15/02/00, final on 15/02/00
H46-442 40952 Paderni II, judgment of 05/04/00 - Friendly settlement
H32-443 21707 Panissa, D., G. and A. Vittonetto
H32-444 39155 Perilli and Gigotti Micheli, Interim Resolution DH(99)509
H46-445 45070 Persichetti and C.S.r.l., judgment of 27/07/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-446 44380 Pettirossi, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46-447 28936 Piccinini II, judgment of 11/04/00 - Friendly settlement
H32-448 39899 Pirilli, Interim Resolution DH(99)623
H46-449 45065 Pirola, judgment of 27/07/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-450 46967 Procaccianti, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-451 46969 Procopio, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-452 44412 Quattrone Pasquale, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H46-453 38498 Rando, judgment of 15/02/00, final on 15/02/00
H46-454 45058 Rettura, judgment of 17/10/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-455 44465 Rigutto, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-456 43098 Romano, judgment of 28/09/00 - Friendly settlement
H32-457 35328 Roselli Italo II, Interim Resolution DH(98)440
H46-458 44479 Rosetti e Ciucci and C., judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H46-459 44527 Rossana Ferrari, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-460 44472 Rossi Valeria, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-461 44461 Sacchi Roberto, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-462 38135 Sanna, judgment of 11/04/00, final on 11/04/00
H46-463 44466 Santoro Valerio, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-464 47780 Santorum, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
Section 3.a
H46-465 45854 Savino, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 04/04/01
H46-466 44419 Sbrojavacca Pietrobon, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46-467 36621 Scalvini, judgment of 26/10/99, final on 26/10/99
H46-468 44491 Sonego, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-469 44470 Spada, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-470 56094 Sposito, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H46-471 39705 Spurio II, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01
H32-472 39865 Staffolani, Interim Resolution DH(99)635
H46-473 44417 Tagliabue, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H32-474 38102 Talenti, Interim Resolution (2001)58
H46-475 44486 Tebaldi, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-476 44425 Tedesco Michele, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46-477 46539 Tor Di Valle Costruzioni S.P.A. VII, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46-478 45068 Toscano and others, judgment of 27/07/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-479 44488 Vecchi and others, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-480 44528 Vecchini, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-481 44534 Venturini Alberto I, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H32-482 40586 Verini II, Interim Resolution DH(99)639
H46-483 40599 Vicari II, judgment of 15/02/00
H46-484 44395 Visentin, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46-485 37166 Vitale and others, judgment of 02/11/99
H46-486 44445 W.I.E. S.n.c., judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46-487 44462 Zanasi, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-488 37079 Zironi, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01
- Administrative courts[31]
H46-489 41809 A.B. V, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00
H46-490 34437 Caliendo, judgment of 14/03/00, final on 14/03/00
H46-491 41817 Caliri, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00
H46-492 41807 Centioni and others, judgment of 09/01/01 - Friendly settlement
H46-493 41815 Monti Enrico, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00
H46-494 41810 Mosca, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00
H46-495 41813 Musiani, judgment of 09/01/01 - Friendly settlement
H46-496 41816 Paradiso Antonio, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00
H46-497 31631 Procaccini, judgment of 30/03/00, final on 30/03/00
H46-498 41814 Zeoli and 34 others, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 05/10/00
- Court of Audit
H46-502 41823 Pascali and Conte, judgment of 05/04/00 - Friendly settlement
H32-506 39175 Sileo, Interim Resolution DH(99)524
- Labour courts[32]
H46-511 40363 Ascierto Ada, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-512 43063 Bello, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-513 43094 C.B., judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-514 42999 Cacciacarro, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-515 43020 Ciaramella Pasquale, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H32-516 36615 Cappello, Interim Resolution DH(99)212
H32-517 38095 Cardillo, Interim Resolution DH(99)317
H46-518 46521 Ciccardi, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46-519 42996 Cocca, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-520 44532 Colacrai, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 12/12/01
H46-521 43088 Coppolaro, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
Section 3.a
H46-522 43086 Cosimo Cesare, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-523 43087 Cosimo Rotondi, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-524 43083 D’Addona Simone, judgment of 22/06/00 – Friendly settlement
H46-525 43017 D’Ambrosio, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-526 43059 D’Antonoli, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-527 43054 Del Buono, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-528 43051 Di Biase Leonardo, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-529 43062 Di Blasio Concetta, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-530 46975 Di Gabriele, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-531 43030 Di Libero, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-532 43022 Di Mella, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-533 46978 F.P., judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-534 43056 Fallarino, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-535 43058 Foschini, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-536 45855 Fr.C., judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01
H46-537 43096 G.A. IV, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-538 43093 G.P. VI, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-539 43075 Gallo Giuseppe, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-540 37170 Giampietro, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46-541 38975 Gioia Angelina, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-542 43050 Gioia Filomena Giovanna, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-543 43074 Grasso, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-544 42998 Iannotta, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-545 39124 Guagenti, judgment of 15/02/00, final on 15/02/00
H46-546 43072 Guarino, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-547 43091 Iadarola, judgment of 27/07/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-548 43101 Iannotti, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-549 43021 Iapalucci, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-550 43067 Izzo Italia, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-551 43065 Lanni, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-552 43102 Lepore T., Lepore M. and Iannotti T., judgment of 27/07/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-553 43068 Luciano, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-554 43095 M.C. X, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-555 43010 Mannello, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H32-556 37160 Marsicovetere, Interim Resolution DH(99)221
H46-557 43000 Maselli, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-558 43018 Meoli, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-559 43069 Mercone, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-560 43057 Mongillo, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-561 43064 Nicolella, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-562 43100 Orsini, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-563 43076 P.T. II, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-564 43012 Palumbo, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-565 43052 Panzanella, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-566 43061 Patuto, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-567 43060 Pizzi, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-568 43023 Pozella, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-569 46974 Risola, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-570 43019 Rubortone, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-571 43055 Sabatino, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-572 43099 Santillo, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-573 43085 Silvio Cesare, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-574 42997 Squillace, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-575 43084 Tontoli, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-576 46960 Trimboli, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-577 43016 Truocchio, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
Section 3.a
H46-578 43070 Vignona, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-579 43109 Zeoli Nicolina, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-580 43015 Zollo Clavio, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-581 43066 Zullo, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
- Criminal courts[33]
H46-582 38878 Ciacci, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-583 42351 Del Giudice, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 06/09/01
H46-584 45267 F.R. and 3 others, judgment of 26/07/01, final on 26/10/01
H46-585 41603 G.B.Z., L.Z. and S.Z., judgment of 14/12/99, final on 15/02/00
H46-586 41094 Giannangeli, judgment of 05/07/01, final on 05/10/01
H46-587 32646 Guerresi, judgment of 24/04/01, final on 24/04/01
H46-588 41893 Martinez, judgment of 26/07/01, final on 26/10/01
H46-589 23969 Mattoccia, judgment of 25/07/00
H46-590 44943 Orlandi, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-591 29898 Patanè, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-592 30132 Pepe Umberto, judgment of 27/04/00, final on 27/07/00
H32-593 36733 Perilli, Interim Resolution DH(99)427
H32-594 24170 Pesce Mario, Interim Resolution DH(97)468
H46-595 37118 Sergi, judgment of 11/04/00 - Friendly settlement
H32-596 26806 U.O. I, Interim Resolution DH(98)52
H32-597 26781 U.O. II, Interim Resolution DH(98)129
H32-598 26782 U.O. III, Interim Resolution DH(98)130
H46-599 43199 Visintin, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
- Criminal proceedings combined with civil action for damages[34]
H46-600 45856 Bacigalupi, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46-601 45857 Comella and others, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01
H46-602 45858 Tesconi, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01
- 1 case against the Netherlands
H46-603 34462 Wessels-Bergervoet, judgment of 04/06/2002, final on 04/09/2002 and judgment of
12/11/2002 (Article 41) – Friendly settlement
- 6 cases against Poland
- Just satisfaction to be paid
H46-604 34611 Dacewicz, judgment of 02/07/2002, final on 02/10/2002
H46-605 33885 Kawka Eryk, judgment of 27/06/2002, final on 27/09/2002
H46-606 24244 Migoń, judgment of 25/06/2002, final on 25/09/2002[35]
H46-607 27715+ Berliński Roman and Sławomir, judgment of 20/06/2002, final on 20/09/2002
H46-608 48684 Uthke, judgment of 18/06/02, défintif le 18/09/02[36]
- Default interest to be paid
H32-609 24559 Gibas, Interim Resolution DH(97)242
Section 3.a
- 12 cases against Portugal
- Just satisfaction to be paid
H46-610 54073 Agostinho, judgment of 03/10/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46-611 48233 Almeida Do Couto, judgment of 30/05/02 - Friendly settlement
H46-612 47460 Câmara Pestana, judgment of 16/05/2002, final on 16/08/2002
H46-613 48752 Coelho, judgment of 30/05/02 - Friendly settlement
H46-614 49020 F. Santos Lda., judgment of 16/05/02 - Friendly settlement
H46-615 50843+ Longotrans - Transportes Internacionais Lda, judgment of 03/10/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46-616 47833 Marques Francisco, judgment of 06/06/2002, final on 06/09/2002
H46-617 53793 Morais Sarmento, judgment of 03/10/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46-618 54449 Saraiva e Lei, judgment of 03/10/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46-619 49118 SIB - Sociedade Imobiliária Da Benedita Lda, judgment of 16/05/02 - Friendly settlement
H46-620 44298 Tourtier, judgment of 14/02/02, final on 14/05/02
- Default interest to be paid
H46-621 43654 Pires, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
- 10 cases against Romania
- Just satisfaction to be paid
H46-622 35831 Bălănescu, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002
H46-623 34992 Basacopol, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002
H46-624 33912 Budescu and Petrescu, judgment of 02/07/2002, final on 02/10/2002,
rectified on 09/07/2002
H46-625 29053 Ciobanu, judgment of 16/07/2002, final on 16/10/2002
H46-626 32925 Cretu, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002
H46-627 32943 Falcoianu and others, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002
H46-628 29968 Hodoş and others, judgment of 21/05/2002, final on 04/09/2002[37]
H46-629 29407 Vasiliu, judgment of 21/05/2002, final on 04/09/2002[38]
H46-630 32260 Surpaceanu Constantin and Traian-Victor, judgment of 21/05/2002,
final on 21/08/2002
- Default interest to be paid
H46-631 28342 Brumărescu, judgments of 28/10/99, 23/01/01 (Article 41) and 11/05/01
(rectification) – Grand Chamber
- 1 case against Slovenia
H46-633 42320 Belinger, judgment of 13/06/2002 - Friendly settlement
Section 3.a
- 17 cases against Turkey
- Just satisfaction to be paid
H46-635 38578 Kaplan Süleyman, judgment of 10/10/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46-636 33234 N.Ö, judgment of 17/10/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46-637 29296 İğdeli, judgment of 20/06/2002, final on 20/09/2002
H46-638 34481 Filiz and Kalkan, judgment of 20/06/2002, final on 20/09/2002
H46-639 33179 Karataş Seher, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002[39]
H46-640 29590 Yağmurdereli, judgment of 04/06/2002, final on 04/09/2002[40]
H46-641 27694 A.S., judgment of 28/03/02 – Friendly settlement
H46-642 38916 Atalağ, judgment of 27/06/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46-643 38915 Bayram Abdullah Naci, judgment of 27/06/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46-644 35867 Bayram and others, judgment of 27/06/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46-649 37414 Birsel and others, judgment of 27/06/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46-652 35050 Karabıyık and others, judgment of 27/06/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46-656 33419 Özdiler Hasan Doğan, judgment of 27/06/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46-659 35079 Özkan and others, judgment of 27/06/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46-664 35866 Ünlü Dudu, judgment of 27/06/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46-665 30944 Öcal, judgment of 10/10/2002 - Friendly settlement
- Default interest to be paid
H46-666 22876 Şemse Önen, judgment of 26/01/02, final on 14/05/02
- 9 cases against the United Kingdom
H46-667 43290 McShane, judgment of 28/05/2002, final on 28/08/2002[41]
H46-668 30668+ Wilson and the National Union of journalists; Palmer, Wyeth and the National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers; Doolan and others, judgment of 02/07/2002, final on 02/10/2002[42]
H46-669 56547 P., C. and S., judgment of 16/07/2002, final on 16/10/2002[43]
H46-671 65905 Rice, judgment of 01/10/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46-672 42007 Davies, judgment of 16/07/2002, final on 16/10/2002, rectified on 13/09/2002
H46-673 24265 Devenney, judgment of 19/03/02, final on 19/06/02
H46-674 46477 Edwards Paul and Audrey, judgment of 14/03/02, final on 14/06/02[44]
H46-675 25680 I., judgment of 11/07/2002 - Grand Chamber[45]
H46-676 28957 Goodwin Christine, judgment of 11/07/2002 - Grand Chamber[46]
- 1 case against « the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia”
H46-678 58185 Janeva, judgment of 03/10/2002 - Friendly settlement
3.b SUPERVISION OF THE PAYMENT OF THE CAPITAL SUM OF THE JUST
SATISFACTION IN CASES WHERE THE DEADLINE FOR PAYMENT
EXPIRED MORE THAN 6 MONTHS AGO
Some of the cases appearing under this section concern late payment for reasons beyond the control of the Governments concerned.
Expiry date
of the time-limit set
- 11 cases against France
H32-679 26984 Picard, Interim Resolution DH(99)30 31/01/1999
H32-680 25971 Proma di Franco Gianotti, Interim Resolution DH(99)566 14/05/00+02/01/2001
H32-681 31409 Riccobono, Interim Resolution DH(99)557 26/09/2001
H46-682 35683 Vaudelle, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 06/09/01 06/12/2001
H46-683 44451 A.A.U., judgment of 19/06/01, final on 19/09/01 19/12/2001
H32-684 26242 Lemoine Pierre, Interim Resolution DH(99)353 17/03/2002
H46-685 44069 G.B. II, judgment of 02/10/01, final on 02/01/02 02/04/2002
H46-686 37794 Pannullo and Forte, judgment of 30/10/01, final on 30/01/02 30/04/2002
H46-687 33023 Meier, judgment of 07/02/02 – Friendly settlement 07/05/2002
H46-689 44070 Beljanski, judgment of 07/02/02, final on 07/05/02 07/08/2002
H46-690 39278 Langlois, judgment of 07/02/02, final on 07/05/02 07/08/2002
- 31 cases against Italy
H46-691 20855 Esposito Luigi, judgment of 25/05/00 - Friendly settlement 25/08/2000
H46-693 31260 Lamperi Balenci, judgment of 21/02/02 - Friendly settlement 21/05/2002
H46-694 41232 Quartucci, judgment of 28/03/02 – Friendly settlement 28/06/2002
- Civil courts[47]
H46-700 44421 Galasso, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02 25/04/2002
H46-701 44501 Il Messaggero S.A.S. VI, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02 25/04/2002
H46-707 51708 I.M., judgment of 11/12/2001, final on 11/03/2002 11/06/2002
H46-708 51668 Lopriore, judgment of 11/12/2001, final on 11/03/2002 11/06/2002
H46-713 51672 Selva, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02 11/06/2002
H46-719 56101 Mesiti, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02 12/08/2002
H46-721 56093 Società Croce Gialla Romana S.a.s., judgment of 12/02/02,
final on 12/05/02 12/08/2002
- Administrative courts[48]
H46-726 44330 Principe and others, judgment of 19/12/00 - Friendly settlement 19/03/2001
H46-727 41806 Alesiani and 510 others, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01 27/08/2001
H46-728 41805 Arivella, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01 27/08/2001
H46-729 41804 Ciotta, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01 27/08/2001
H46-730 35956 Galatà and others, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01 27/08/2001
H46-731 44525 Ferrari Marcella II, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02 25/04/2002
H46-732 44379 Finessi, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02 25/04/2002
H46-733 44343 Massimo Giuseppe I, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02 25/04/2002
H46-734 44352 Massimo Giuseppe II, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02 25/04/2002
H46-735 44345 Rinaudo and others, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02 25/04/2002
H46-737 44342 Gattuso, judgment of 06/12/2001, final on 06/03/2002 06/06/2002
H46-738 44333 V.P. and F.D.R., judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02 12/08/2002
Section 3.b
- Labour courts[49]
H46-739 43097 Nicoli, judgment of 22/06/00 – Friendly settlement 22/09/2000
H46-741 52924 Frattini and others, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02,
revised judgment of 26/11/2002, final on 26/02/2003[50] 12/08/2002
- Court of Audit
H46-748 54307 Meleddu, judgment of 21/02/02 – Friendly settlement 21/05/2002
H46-749 54316 Betti, judgment of 28/03/02 – Friendly settlement 28/06/2002
H46-750 54293 Chiappetta Domenico, judgment of 28/03/02 – Friendly settlement 28/06/2002
H46-751 54287 Ferrari Sergio, judgment of 28/03/02 – Friendly settlement 28/06/2002
H46-752 54299 Libertini and Di Girolamo, judgment of 28/03/02 – Friendly settlement 28/06/2002
H46-753 44359 Marrama, judgment of 28/03/02 – Friendly settlement 28/06/2002
H46-754 54286 Strangi, judgment of 07/05/02 – Friendly settlement 07/08/2002
- 6 cases against Poland
H46-755 26760 Werner, judgment of 15/11/01 15/02/2002
H32-756 27506 Owczarzak, Interim Resolution DH(99)260 17/03/2002
H46-757 38328 Bejer, judgment of 04/10/01, final on 04/01/02[51] 04/04/2002
H46-758 32499 Z.R., judgment of 15/01/02 – Friendly settlement 15/04/2002
H46-759 25196 Iwańczuk, judgment of 15/11/01, final on 15/02/02 15/05/2002
H46-760 34052 Olstowski, judgment of 15/11/01, final on 15/02/02 15/05/2002
- 1 case against Portugal
H46-762 49018 Marques Jorge Ribeiro, judgment of 04/04/02 – Friendly settlement 04/07/2002
- 10 cases against Turkey
H54-763 15318 Loizidou, judgments of 18/12/96 (merits) and 28/07/98 (just satisfaction) –
Interim Resolutions DH(99)680, DH(2000)105
and ResDH(2001)80[52] 28/10/1998
H46-764 25723 Erdoğdu, judgment of 15/06/00[53] 15/09/2000
H46-765 27308 Demiray, judgment of 21/11/00, final on 04/04/01 04/07/2001
H46-766 34688 Akin, judgment of 12/04/01 12/07/2001
H46-767 19265 Atak and others, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01 30/07/2001
H46-768 19279 Göçmen and others, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01 30/07/2001
H46-769 19285 Karabulut Cemile and others, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01 30/07/2001
H46-770 19303 Şen Celal and Keziban, judgment of 10/04/01, final on 10/07/01 10/10/2001
H46-812 28505 Ülger, judgment of 28/03/02 – Friendly settlement 28/06/2002
H46-813 29856 Özcan Mehmet, judgment of 09/04/02 – Friendly settlement 09/07/2002
- 4 cases against the United Kingdom
H46-814 28883 McKerr, judgment of 04/05/01, final on 04/08/01[54] 04/11/01
H46-815 37715 Shanaghan, judgment of 04/05/01, final on 04/08/01[55] 04/11/01
H46-816 24746 Hugh Jordan, judgment of 04/05/01, final on 04/08/01[56] 04/11/01
H46-817 30054 Kelly and others, judgment of 04/05/01, final on 04/08/01[57] 04/11/01
Table summarising the total number of cases by States
State |
No confirmation of payment of the capital sum |
No confirmation of payment of the capital sum although payment due since more than 6 months |
Payment after expiration of the time-limit set and no confirmation of payment of the default interest due |
Austria |
1 |
||
Belgium |
1 |
||
Cyprus |
1 |
||
Finland |
1 |
||
France |
20 |
12 |
14 |
Greece |
1 |
8 |
|
Hungary |
2 |
||
Italy |
141 |
54 |
279 |
Macedonia |
1 |
||
Netherlands |
1 |
||
Poland |
5 |
6 |
1 |
Portugal |
11 |
2 |
1 |
Roumania |
9 |
1 |
|
Slovakia |
1 |
||
Slovénia |
1 |
||
Turkey |
32 |
51 |
1 |
United Kindom |
11 |
4 |
List of cases for which late information on payment of just satisfaction has been provided
up to 10 January 2003
(827th meeting, 11 and 12 February 2003, Sections 2, 3 and 4)
The information presented in the table below is the sole responsibility of the states concerned. Bearing in mind the date upon which this information was communicated to it, the Secretariat has not yet had the opportunity to check it. This will be done for the next meeting.
Liste d’affaires pour lesquelles des informations tardives sur le paiement de la satisfaction équitable ont été fournies jusqu’au 10 janvier 2003
(827e réunion, 11 et 12 février 2003, Rubriques 2, 3 et 4)
Les informations présentées dans le tableau ci-dessous relèvent de la seule responsabilité des Etats concernés. Compte tenu de la date de la transmission de ces informations, le Secrétariat n’a pas encore eu l’occasion de les vérifier. Cette vérification sera effectuée pour la prochaine réunion.
Item / Point |
State / Etat |
Application / Requête |
Case/ Affaire |
Section / Rubrique |
Judgment of / Arrêt du |
Final on / Définitif le |
H46-67 |
A |
33505 |
H.E. |
2 |
11/07/02 |
06/11/02 |
H46-71 |
CY |
51591 |
Markass Car Hire Ltd. |
2 |
02/07/02 |
06/11/02 |
H46-95 |
SP |
45238 |
Perote Pellon |
2 |
25/07/02 |
25/10/02 |
H46-97 |
TR |
25144 |
Sadak Selim and others / et autres |
2 |
11/06/02 |
6/11//02 |
H46-121 |
CY |
53594 |
Alithia Publising Company |
3.a |
11/07/02 |
11/10/02 |
H46-122 |
FIN |
30013 |
Türkiye iş Bankasi |
3.a |
18/06/02 |
18/09/02 |
H46-135 |
F |
47007 |
Arnal |
3.a |
19/03/02 |
19/06/02 |
H46-320 |
I |
28272 |
Ghidotti |
3.a |
21/02/02 |
21/05/02 |
H46-632 |
SK |
32106 |
Komanický |
3.a |
04/06/02 |
04/09/02 |
H46-634 |
TR |
29289 |
Aydın Mehmet |
3.a |
16/07/02 |
16/07/02 |
H46-645 |
TR |
37087 |
Bekmezci and others / et autres |
3.a |
27/06/02 |
27/06/02 |
H46-646 |
TR |
20132 |
Bilgin Burhan |
3.a |
20/06/02 |
20/09/02 |
H46-647 |
TR |
20133 |
Bilgin Leyli |
3.a |
20/06/02 |
20/09/02 |
H46-648 |
TR |
20134 |
Bilgin Münir |
3.a |
20/06/02 |
20/09/02 |
H46-650 |
TR |
20136 |
Canlı |
3.a |
20/06/02 |
20/09/02 |
H46-651 |
TR |
20142 |
Günal Kazım |
3.a |
20/06/02 |
20/09/02 |
H46-653 |
TR |
30448 |
Önel Ahmet |
3.a |
23/05/02 |
23/08/02 |
H46-654 |
TR |
30948 |
Önel Mehmet |
3.a |
23/05/02 |
23/08/02 |
H46-655 |
TR |
30446 |
Önel Temur |
3.a |
23/05/02 |
23/08/02 |
H46-657 |
TR |
30447 |
Özel Hacı Bayram |
3.a |
23/05/02 |
23/08/02 |
H46-658 |
TR |
31964 |
Özel Hacı Osman |
3.a |
23/05/02 |
23/08/02 |
H46-660 |
TR |
20153 |
Şen Ismet |
3.a |
20/06/02 |
20/09/02 |
H46-661 |
TR |
20156 |
Şen Kemal |
3.a |
20/06/02 |
20/09/02 |
H46-662 |
TR |
20154 |
Şen Mahmut |
3.a |
20/06/02 |
20/09/02 |
H46-663 |
TR |
20158 |
Taşdemir Mehmet (n° 2) |
3.a |
20/06/02 |
20/09/02 |
H46-670 |
UK |
37471 |
Faulkner William (n° 2) |
3.a |
04/06/02 |
04/09/02 |
H46-677 |
UK |
40302 |
Matthews Michael |
3.a |
15/07/02 |
15/07/02 |
H32-688 |
F |
29877 |
Pauchet and others / et autres |
3.b |
28/02/98 |
28/02/98 |
H46-692 |
I |
31143 |
Indelicato |
3.b |
18/10/01 |
18/01/02 |
H46-695 |
I |
47247 |
Mercuri |
3.b |
11/04/02 |
11/04/02 |
H32-696 |
I |
25249 |
Cazzorla & Gigante |
3.b |
16/02/96 |
16/02/96 |
H46-698 |
I |
49372 |
De Pilla |
3.b |
25/10/01 |
25/01/02 |
H46-699 |
I |
44446 |
Di Girolamo and others / et autres |
3.b |
25/10/01 |
25/01/02 |
H46-702 |
I |
49314 |
Steiner & Hassid Steiner |
3.b |
06/12/01 |
06/03/02 |
H46-703 |
I |
51671 |
Arrigoni |
3.b |
11/12/01 |
11/03/02 |
H46-704 |
I |
51678 |
Baioni & Badini |
3.b |
11/12/01 |
11/03/02 |
H46-705 |
I |
51667 |
Bertot |
3.b |
11/12/01 |
11/03/02 |
H46-706 |
I |
51696 |
Cappelletti & Dell'Agnese |
3.b |
11/12/01 |
11/03/02 |
H46-709 |
I |
51706 |
Mannari |
3.b |
11/12/01 |
11/03/02 |
H46-710 |
I |
51704 |
Rota Giacomo & Gianfranco |
3.b |
11/12/01 |
11/03/02 |
H46-711 |
I |
51705 |
Rota Roberto & Giuseppe |
3.b |
11/12/01 |
11/03/02 |
H46-712 |
I |
51710 |
Rossi Gianbattista |
3.b |
11/12/01 |
11/03/02 |
H46-714 |
I |
51670 |
Sordelli & C. S.n.c. |
3.b |
11/12/01 |
11/03/02 |
H46-715 |
I |
51711 |
Spanu |
3.b |
11/12/01 |
11/03/02 |
H46-716 |
I |
51673 |
Tiozzo Peschiero L. & L. |
3.b |
11/12/01 |
11/03/02 |
H46-717 |
I |
51707 |
Vanzetti |
3.b |
11/12/01 |
11/03/02 |
H46-718 |
I |
41803 |
Pupillo |
3.b |
18/12/01 |
18/03/02[58] |
H32-724 |
I |
15800 |
Perego & Romanet |
3.b |
12/01/94 |
12/01/94 |
H32-725 |
I |
27189 |
Bevilacqua |
3.b |
21/07/97 |
21/07/97 |
H46-736 |
I |
44346 |
Venturini Alberto II |
3.b |
25/10/01 |
25/01/02 |
H46-740 |
I |
51677 |
Meneghini |
3.b |
11/12/01 |
11/03/02 |
H46-761 |
P |
43999 |
Martins Serra & Andrade Cancio |
3.b |
06/12/01 |
06/03/02 |
H46-771 |
TR |
19661 |
Çalkan Gülnahar |
3.b |
05/06/01 |
05/09/01 |
H46-772 |
TR |
19662 |
Çalkan Rabia |
3.b |
05/06/01 |
05/09/01 |
H46-773 |
TR |
19663 |
Çapar Ekrem |
3.b |
05/06/01 |
05/09/01 |
H46-774 |
TR |
19664 |
Çelebi Hamdi |
3.b |
05/06/01 |
05/09/01 |
H46-775 |
TR |
19665 |
Çalkan Seyfettin |
3.b |
05/06/01 |
05/09/01 |
H46-776 |
TR |
19666 |
Çapar Nuri |
3.b |
05/06/01 |
05/09/01 |
H46-777 |
TR |
19668 |
Dalgiç Hayrettin |
3.b |
05/06/01 |
05/09/01 |
H46-778 |
TR |
19669 |
Dalgiç Necati |
3.b |
05/06/01 |
05/09/01 |
H46-779 |
TR |
19670 |
Dişçi Dursun |
3.b |
05/06/01 |
05/09/01 |
H46-780 |
TR |
19671 |
Dişçi Hasan |
3.b |
05/06/01 |
05/09/01 |
H46-781 |
TR |
19672 |
Dişçi Osman |
3.b |
05/06/01 |
05/09/01 |
H46-782 |
TR |
19673 |
Güneysu Davut |
3.b |
05/06/01 |
05/09/01 |
H46-783 |
TR |
19674 |
Kartal Ali |
3.b |
05/06/01 |
05/09/01 |
H46-784 |
TR |
19675 |
Koç Hasan |
3.b |
05/06/01 |
05/09/01 |
H46-785 |
TR |
19676 |
Koçer Ayse |
3.b |
05/06/01 |
05/09/01 |
H46-786 |
TR |
19678 |
Öztürk Ali |
3.b |
05/06/01 |
05/09/01 |
H46-787 |
TR |
19679 |
Öztürk Gülfiye |
3.b |
05/06/01 |
05/09/01 |
H46-788 |
TR |
19681 |
Öztürk Kamil |
3.b |
05/06/01 |
05/09/01 |
H46-789 |
TR |
19682 |
Öztürk Muhsin |
3.b |
05/06/01 |
05/09/01 |
H46-790 |
TR |
19683 |
Öztürk Mustafa |
3.b |
05/06/01 |
05/09/01 |
H46-791 |
TR |
19640 |
Akça Halim |
3.b |
03/07/01 |
03/10/01 |
H46-792 |
TR |
19641 |
Akçay Mehmet |
3.b |
03/07/01 |
03/10/01 |
H46-793 |
TR |
19642 |
Akkaya Ahmet |
3.b |
03/07/01 |
03/10/01 |
H46-794 |
TR |
19643 |
Akkaya İbrahim |
3.b |
03/07/01 |
03/10/01 |
H46-795 |
TR |
19644 |
Akkaya Mustafa |
3.b |
03/07/01 |
03/10/01 |
H46-796 |
TR |
19645 |
Balci Hüseyin |
3.b |
03/07/01 |
03/10/01 |
H46-797 |
TR |
19646 |
Balci Macit |
3.b |
03/07/01 |
03/10/01 |
H46-798 |
TR |
19647 |
Baltekin Bilge |
3.b |
03/07/01 |
03/10/01 |
H46-799 |
TR |
19648 |
Başar Halil |
3.b |
03/07/01 |
03/10/01 |
H46-800 |
TR |
19649 |
Başar Talip |
3.b |
03/07/01 |
03/10/01 |
H46-801 |
TR |
19650 |
Bilgin Ahmet |
3.b |
03/07/01 |
03/10/01 |
H46-802 |
TR |
19651 |
Bilgin Mahmut |
3.b |
03/07/01 |
03/10/01 |
H46-803 |
TR |
19652 |
Bilgin Mehmet II |
3.b |
03/07/01 |
03/10/01 |
H46-804 |
TR |
19653 |
Bilgiç Yusuf |
3.b |
03/07/01 |
03/10/01 |
H46-805 |
TR |
19654 |
Dinç Fethiye |
3.b |
03/07/01 |
03/10/01 |
H46-806 |
TR |
19655 |
Dokel Ünzile |
3.b |
03/07/01 |
03/10/01 |
H46-807 |
TR |
19656 |
Eğrikale Saadettin |
3.b |
03/07/01 |
03/10/01 |
H46-808 |
TR |
19657 |
Erol Naside II |
3.b |
03/07/01 |
03/10/01 |
H46-809 |
TR |
19658 |
Erol Recep |
3.b |
03/07/01 |
03/10/01 |
H46-810 |
TR |
19659 |
Erol Sefer |
3.b |
03/07/01 |
03/10/01 |
H46-811 |
TR |
30492 |
Erat & Sağlam |
3.b |
26/03/02 |
26/03/02 |
H46-640 |
TR |
29590 |
Yağmurdereli |
3.a + 4.2 |
04/06/02 |
04/09/02 |
3.c EXAMINATION OF SPECIAL PAYMENT PROBLEMS (FOR EXAMPLE THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THE APPLICANT, DISPUTES REGARDING THE EXACT AMOUNT PAID AS A RESULT OF EXCHANGE RATE PROBLEMS OR ADMINISTRATIVE FEES)
- 2 cases against Italy
H46-818 53708 Mas A. and 207 others, judgment of 07/06/01 – Friendly settlement
Addendum General Questions
The case concerns the length of certain civil proceedings brought by haemophiliacs seeking compensation for damages suffered following blood transfusions infected with various viruses (complaints under Article 6§1). The proceedings in the present case are the same as those challenged in the cases A.B., E.F. and C.C. (Application No. 37874+, Interim Resolution DH(98)392), M.A. and 81 others (Application No. 44814+, Friendly settlement of 30/11/2000) and M.L. & 46 others (Application No. 53705, Friendly settlement of 05/04/2001).
Payment problems: The Court struck this case out of its list on the basis of a friendly settlement agreed between the parties according to which the Italian Government offered to pay to each of the 208 applicants certain sums, ranging from 5 000 000 Italian lire to 73 300 000 Italian lire (for a global sum of 9 687 800 000 Italian lire – see the detailed list available at the Registry of the Court) for non-pecuniary damages as well as, to all the applicants, the global sum of 80 000 000 Italian lire for costs and expenses. The payment took place between 5 and 9 November 2001, i.e. more than two months after the expiry of the time-limit set, namely the 7 September 2001. The payment of costs and expenses as well as of default interests due has not yet been made. A letter recalling the Committee of Ministers’ principles on payment of default interests was addressed to the Italian authorities on 30 January 2002.
Subsequently however, at the 783rd meeting (February 2002), the question of the application of default interests in the supervision of the execution of friendly settlements was raised in other cases; the Deputies instructed therefore the Secretariat to prepare a document summarising the considerations to be taken into account concerning this issue and agreed to resume its consideration at their 792nd meeting (16, 17 and 19 (3 p.m.) April 2002). Having not found an agreement, the Deputies decided to reconsider the matter at their 798th (June 2002), 803rd (July 2002), 810th (October 2002), 819th (December 2002) and 827th (February 2003) meetings (DH) in the light of written contributions that the Delegations would send to the Secretariat (see General Questions, item e. and Addendum General Questions).
H46-819 53705 M.L. and 46 others, judgment of 05/04/01 – Friendly settlement
Addendum General Questions
The case concerns the length of certain civil proceedings brought by haemophiliacs seeking compensation for damages suffered following blood transfusions infected with various viruses (complaints under Article 6§1). The proceedings in the present case are the same as those challenged in the cases A.B., E.F. and C.C. (Application No. 37874+, Interim Resolution DH(98)392), M.A. and 81 others (Application No. 44814+, Friendly settlement of 30/11/2000) and Mas. A. & 207 others (Application No. 53708, Friendly settlement of 07/06/2001).
Payment problems: The Court struck this case out of its list on the basis of a friendly settlement agreed between the parties according to which the Italian Government offered to pay to each of the 47 applicants certain sums, ranging from 15 000 000 Italian lire to 75 000 000 Italian lire (for a global sum of 1 910 000 000 Italian lire – see the detailed list available at the Registry of the Court) for non-pecuniary damages as well as, to all the applicants, the global sum of 20 000 000 Italian lire for costs and expenses. Although the Government had undertaken to pay these sums before 5 July 2001, the payment of costs and expenses has not yet been made, while the other sums were in fact paid between 11 and 13 September 2001, i.e. with a delay of more than two months. The Italian authorities have argued that no default interest is due because the friendly settlement did not include any clause on the subject: the applicants’ counsel has accordingly invited the Committee of Ministers to express its views on the lawfulness of such a position. At the 775th meeting (December 2001), it was recalled that, according to the practice of the Committee of Ministers, the payment of default interest was due whenever the payment took place more than three months after the date at which the judgment became final. This also applies to friendly settlements, unless the parties have explicitly agreed different terms. A letter recalling these principles was addressed to the Italian authorities on 30 January 2002.
Section 3.c
Subsequently however, at the 783rd meeting (February 2002), the question of the application of default interests in the supervision of the execution of friendly settlements was raised in other cases; the Deputies instructed therefore the Secretariat to prepare a document summarising the considerations to be taken into account concerning this issue and agreed to resume its consideration at their 792nd meeting (16, 17 and 19 (3 p.m.) April 2002). Having not found an agreement, the Deputies decided to reconsider the matter at their 798th (June 2002), 803rd (July 2002), 810th (October 2002), 819th (December 2002) and 827th (February 2003) meetings (DH) in the light of written contributions that the Delegations would send to the Secretariat (see General Questions, item e. and Addendum General Questions).
- 37 cases against Turkey
H46-820 28635+ Aksoy Ibrahim, judgment of 10/10/00, final on 10/01/01[59]
H46-821 30947 Alpay, judgment of 27/02/01 – Friendly settlement
H46-822 26093+ B.T. and others, judgment of 14/11/00 – Friendly settlement
H46-823 28340 Büyükdağ, judgment of 21/12/00, final on 21/03/01
H46-824 25182+ Cankoçak, judgment of 20/02/01, final on 20/05/01
H46-825 25724 Cihan, judgment of 30/01/01 – Friendly settlement
H46-826 31963 Özel and others, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46-827 26680 Şener, judgment of 18/07/00[60]
H46-828 27697+ Yaşar and others, judgment of 14/11/00, final on 14/02/01
H46-829 19310 Yilmaz Hamit, judgment of 10/04/01, final on 10/07/01
H46-830 19308 Yilmaz Zekeriya, judgment of 10/04/01, final on 10/07/01
H46-831 26976+ Sürek Kamil Tekin V, judgment of 16/07/2002 - Friendly settlement[61]
In these cases the applicants and/or the Secretariat have identified various problems relating to the payment of just satisfaction. These problems concern mostly more or less substantial shortfalls in payment, due among other things to currency conversion and/or delays in payment (default interest).
The Turkish authorities have undertaken to examine these problems with a view to settling the outstanding amounts due in accordance with the Court’s judgments. Information is awaited on the progress made to that effect.
H54-832 22729 Kaya Mehmet, judgment of 19/02/98, Interim Resolutions DH(99)434 and ResDH(2002)98
H54-833 21893 Akdivar, Çiçek, Aktaş, Karabulut, judgment of 16/09/96, Interim Resolutions DH(99)434 and ResDH(2002)98
H54-834 23178 Aydin, judgment of 25/09/97, Interim Resolutions DH(99)434 and ResDH(2002)98
H54-835 24276 Kurt, judgment of 25/05/98, Interim Resolutions DH(99)434 and ResDH(2002)98
H54-836 23818 Ergi, judgment of 28/07/98, Interim Resolutions DH(99)434 and ResDH(2002)98
H54-837 22495 Yaşa, judgment of 02/09/98, Interim Resolutions DH(99)434 and ResDH(2002)98
H46-838 23657 Çakici, judgment of 08/07/99, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98
H46-839 23763 Tanrikulu, judgment of 08/07/99, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98
H46-840 23144 Özgür Gündem, judgment of 16/03/00, Interim Resolution ResDH(2001)106[62]
H46-841 22535 Kaya Mahmut, judgment of 28/03/00, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98
H46-842 22492 Kiliç, judgment of 28/03/00, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98
H46-843 20764 Ertak Ismail, judgment of 09/05/00, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98
H46-844 23531 Timurtaş, judgment of 13/06/00, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98
Section 3.c
H46-845 21986 Salman, judgment of 27/06/00 – Grand Chamber, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98
H46-846 22277 Ilhan Nasir, judgment of 27/06/00, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98
H32-847 23179+ Yilmaz, Ovat, Şahin et Dündar, Interim Resolutions DH(99)434 and ResDH(2002)98
H32-848 25658 Aslantaş Sedat, Interim Resolutions DH(99)560 and ResDH(2001)106[63]
H46-849 22947+ Akkoç Nebahat, judgment of 10/10/00, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98
H46-850 24396 Taş Beşir, judgment of 14/11/00, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98
H46-851 23819 Bilgin İhsan, judgment of 16/11/00, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98
H46-852 22676 Gül Mehmet, judgment of 14/12/00, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98
H46-853 25801 Dulaş Zubeyde, judgment of 30/01/01, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98
H46-854 22493 Berktay, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98
H46-855 24490 Şarli, judgment of 22/05/01, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98
H46-856 23954 Akdeniz and others, judgment of 31/05/01, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98
In these 25 cases, the applicants, their representatives and the Secretariat have raised various problems relating to the payment of just satisfaction. These problems concern mostly more or less substantial shortfalls in payment. The total shortfall claimed by the applicants in these 25 cases amounts to more than 250 000 pounds sterling (including default interest).
During the examination of these cases in the Committee of Ministers, some concerns have been expressed about the comprehensive and persistent shortfalls in payment of just satisfaction and Turkey has been invited to remedy this problem urgently.
Following a bilateral meeting held in Strasbourg on 18/02/2002 between the Secretariat and a delegation from Ankara, the Turkish authorities’ presented in April 2002 their own calculations in each of the outstanding cases. In many cases the shortfalls acknowledged by the authorities coincide with the figures submitted by the applicants (including the default interest and restitution of a stamp duty erroneously deducted from the payments). However, in some of the cases the calculations differ notably as the payment was not effectuated as prescribed by the Court as regards the place and/or the currency of payment.
On 07/06/2002, the applicants’ representatives responded to the Governments’ calculations by maintaining and further substantiating the sums claimed.
Having examined the parties’ communications, the Secretariat has sent on 14/11/2002 a letter to the Turkish authorities inviting them to proceed to pay the 10 cases in which the shortfalls acknowledged by the authorities correspond to the sums dues. At the 819th meeting (December 2002) the Turkish authorities announced that they would pay these sums shortly. However, no confirmation of payment has so far been received.
As regards the 15 other cases, the shortfalls acknowledged by the Turkish authorities are lower than the actual shortfalls found with reference to the sums granted under the Court's judgments. The Secretariat remains in contact with the Turkish authorities to provide them with the necessary details allowing the payment in conformity with the judgments.
SECTION 4 - CASES RAISING SPECIFIC QUESTION
(INDIVIDUAL MEASURES, MEASURES NOT YET DEFINED OR SPECIAL PROBLEMS)
(See Addendum 4 for part or all these cases)
Action
The Deputies are invited to supervise the progress made in the adoption of the implementing measures in the following cases raising several problems. Supplementary information on some or all the cases listed below will be issued in Addendum 4. The Deputies are invited to resume consideration of these items on a case-by-case basis.
SUB-SECTION 4.1 – SUPERVISION OF INDIVIDUAL MEASURES ONLY[64]
- 1 case against France
H46-857 57753 C.K., judgment of 19/03/02, final on 19/06/02
The case relates to the excessive length of compensation proceedings before administrative courts, introduced by the first applicant, her parents and her brother, the first applicant having discovered after a blood transfusion that she had been infected with the human immunodeficiency virus and with the hepatitis C virus (violation of Article 6§1). These proceedings, which began on 23 March 1998, were still pending when the European Court rendered its judgment having at that date lasted more than 3 years, 10 months.
Individual measures: accelerating the proceedings.
- 1 case against Germany
H46-858 46544 Kutzner, judgment of 26/02/2002, final on 10/07/2002
The case concerns in particular the fact that decisions of German courts withdrawing the applicants’ parental authority in respect of their two daughters constituted interference in their right to respect for their family life (violation of Article 8). On 12/02/1997, the guardianship tribunal decided provisionally to withdraw the applicants' rights to choose where the children lived and to make decisions concerning the need for medical measures. At that time, the children were six and four years old. On 27/05/1997, the tribunal entirely withdrew the applicants' parental authority over their two children.
Individual measures: the German Government has informed the Committee that they are currently considering possible individual measures. The local authority convened a meeting on 08/08/2002 inviting the administration, the guardian, the parents, legal counsellors and human rights NGOs involved in this case. Furthermore, an expert was appointed to examine whether and under what circumstances the children could be returned to their biological family without risk. The expert was to begin work in December 2002. Information awaited.
General measures: the judgment of the European Court has been published in the Europäische Grundrechte Zeitschrift (Volume 2002, pp. 244-251) and transmitted to all authorities concerned.
- 1 case against Italy
H46-883 37119 N.F., judgment of 02/08/2001, final on 12/12/2001[65]
The case notably concerns an unlawful interference with the freedom of association of the applicant, a judge, on account of a disciplinary sanction imposed on him in 1994 because of his belonging to a Masonic association. The Court considered that the sanction was not “foreseeable” or “prescribed by the law” because the provisions at its basis (namely, Article 18 of Royal Decree No. 511 of 31/05/1946 combined with a 1990 directive of the Supreme Judicial Board) were not clear enough (violation of Article 11).
A new directive, clearly establishing the incompatibility of membership of Masonic associations with the exercise of judicial functions was issued in 1993 (when the procedure against the applicant had already started). The applicant indicated his wish that the disciplinary proceedings be reviewed and drew attention to Article 37§6 of the 1946 Decree, which may allow for such a revision (see §42 of the judgment).
Individual measures: Information is expected on the follow-up given by the Supreme Judicial Board (C.S.M.) to the applicant’s request for revision of the impugned disciplinary procedure.
General measures: the Italian authorities indicated that the judgment would be published in Quaderni, the legal journal of the Supreme Judicial Board (C.S.M.)
Sub-section 4.1
- 3 cases against the United Kingdom
H54-859 19187 Saunders, judgment of 17/12/96, Interim Resolution DH(2000)27
H46-860 29522+ I.J.L., G.M.R. and A.K.P., judgment of 19/09/00
These cases concern the violation of the applicants’ right not to incriminate themselves and thus their right to a fair trial in that, at their trials, the prosecution made use of statements given earlier, under legal compulsion and in different proceedings, to Department of Trade and Industry Inspectors (violations of Article 6§1). After the Deputies had decided, on the basis of the information available at the time, to mandate the Secretariat to draft a resolution with a view to closing the examination of the first case, a complaint dated 15/04/2002 was received from the applicants to the effect that they have so far been unable to obtain redress.
Individual measures: The applicants complain in particular of certain obstacles recently encountered in the proceedings they have engaged in order to have their convictions re-examined and overturned following the European Court’s judgments. In support of their request, the applicants make a number of points, including the following:
Following the European Court’s judgments, their case was referred to the Court of Appeal for new examination by the Criminal Cases Review Commission, as the latter had found that there was a real possibility that the Court of Appeal might not uphold the convictions because of the decisions of the European Court.
However, while their case was pending before the Court of Appeal, the House of Lords held in another case concerning a situation which had not been brought before the European Court, that the right to rely on Convention rights in any legal proceedings guaranteed by the Human Rights Act did not have retroactive effect (i.e. before 02/10/2000). In a subsequent judgment, also adopted while the proceedings before the Court of Appeal in the present cases were pending, the House of Lords reached the opposite conclusion but found that, in the interest of judicial certainty, the erroneous construction in its first judgment should not be overturned.
In its decision of 21/12/2001, the Court of Appeal notably indicated that”…if we concluded that we were bound to give effect to the Strasbourg Court’s decision that the trial was unfair by examining anew the safety of the convictions, we would not uphold the convictions on the basis that they are safe in any event” (§47). However, the Court of Appeal did not find itself so bound under Article 46 of the Convention (especially §§50‑53). Neither did it uphold any other ground of appeal. Accordingly, it concluded that the convictions were safe and dismissed the appeal (§86). The applicants sought leave to appeal to the House of Lords.
On 11/02/2002, the Court of Appeal certified that the appeal raised a point of law of general public importance, namely whether the House of Lords decision not to give retroactive effect to the Human Rights Act also covers the situation where the United Kingdom is under the obligation by virtue of Article 46 of the Convention to abide by the European Court’s judgment. On 09/03/2002, the House of Lords granted leave to appeal. The applicants indicate that the case is listed for hearing on 09/10/2002.
At the 798th meeting (June 2002) the Representative of the United Kingdom objected to the applicants’ request for an adjournment, referring notably to the following considerations: the authorities have done all that was required by the Court’s judgment (payment of just satisfaction and legislative reform to prevent recurrence of the violations found). Even if reopening of proceedings is a desirable measure in certain circumstances, the Convention does not require such a measure in all circumstances, and in particular not in respect of cases such as the applicants’. No question had indeed been raised before in these cases regarding any necessity of reopening the proceedings. Moreover, a requirement to reopen or to quash the applicants’ convictions could risk opening the floodgates to reopening requests in respect of cases in which there had been, or might have been, a violation of a Convention right at trial many years ago, something that would risk undermining the “controlled introduction” of the Convention rights into domestic law achieved through the Human Rights Act. Furthermore, the adjournment request appeared primarily to be an attempt to bolster the arguments run domestically. If the appeal failed, this might, however, possibly give raise to an allegation of a fresh violation of the Convention. Such a complaint should, however, be pursued through the ordinary procedure before the European Court. In conclusion the Representative urged the Committee to agree to the closure of the cases.
Sub-section 4.1
At the 810th meeting (October 2002), the Deputies decided not to close the cases but to pursue their examination and to resume consideration of the discussion at their 819th meeting (December 2002) with a view to examining the individual measures to be taken, in the light of the outcome of the proceedings pending before the House of Lords.
At the 819th meeting (December 2002), the United Kingdom Delegation informed the Deputies that the House of Lords had not granted the re-opening of the proceedings. It was noted that if the House of Lords had reconsidered the question of the applicants’ guilt in the light of the violations of their right to a fair trial, the decision would appear acceptable. However the House of Lords’ reasoning would have to be examined before reaching a conclusion. The Deputies accordingly decided to resume consideration of the cases at the present meeting. Having examined the judgment of the House of Lords (http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200203/ldjudgmt/jd021114/lyons-1.htm, copies available to delegations on request) the Secretariat finds that the House of Lords appears to have rejected the appeal solely on the basis of the law as it stood without taking into account the violations of Article 6 of the Convention. The question of individual measures would thus remain outstanding.
The House of Lords in its judgment of 14/11/2002 notably concluded that courts were obliged to examine the safety of convictions according to the law as it stood at the time of the trial (see §16,17,18, 29, 34, 59, 82, 96, 100 of the judgment). At the time of the trial, Section 434(5) of the Companies Act 1985 admitted answers given under compulsory questioning as evidence although this was later found by the European Court in the present cases to violate Article 6 of the Convention. This provision was changed by Parliament by the 1999 Act which came into force on 14/04/2000. However, the House of Lords found that Parliament had no intention to give retroactive effect either to the Act of 1999 or to the Human Rights Act 1998 (see § 18, 63, 81, 98 of the judgment). Besides, the House recalled that it was established in the cases of R v Lambert(2001) 3 WLR 206 and R v Kansal (no.2)(2002) 2 AC 69 that a person who had been convicted at a trial which took place before the entry into force of the Human Rights Act (namely 2/10/2000) could not rely on the rights given by that Act in appeal against a conviction even if lodged after that date(see § 12, 18, 25, 61, 99 of the judgment).Finally, the House held that the domestic law of the UK did not permit the quashing of convictions by reason only of the admission of the evidence in question (see §108 of the judgment) and unanimously dismissed the appeal brought by the applicants.
The applicants have requested the Committee of Ministers to invite the United Kingdom to indicate what measures it intends to take to achieve, as far as possible, restitutio in integrum in their cases.
General measures: The legislative amendments announced in Interim Resolution DH(2000)27 have been adopted.
H46-861 36533 Atlan A. and T., judgment of 19/06/01, final on 19/09/01
The case concerns the absence of a fair trial in that, in criminal proceedings against the applicants, the prosecution repeatedly denied the existence of evidence pertinent to a central issue of the defence and, without the knowledge or approval of the judge, decided that this evidence should not be disclosed to the judge or to the defence (violation of Article 6§1).
In 1991, the applicants were convicted of importing cocaine and sentenced to 18 and 13 years’ imprisonment respectively. The second applicant died in 1998.
The case presents similarities to that of Rowe and Davis against the United Kingdom (judgment of 16/02/2000), which was transferred to Section 6 following the adoption of general and individual measures (reopening of proceedings, quashing convictions) by the United Kingdom.
Individual measures: At the 775th meeting (November 2001) the Government was asked whether this case would be reviewed by the Criminal Cases Review Board as in the Rowe and Davis case. At the 819th meeting (December 2002), the United Kingdom Delegation indicated that the Board did not allow the surviving applicant to have his conviction reviewed before the competent court of appeal. The text of the Board’s decision was requested in order to assess the reasoning used and whether the merits of the case were taken into account.
SUB-SECTION 4.2 – INDIVIDUAL MEASURES AND/OR GENERAL PROBLEMS
- 1 case against Austria
H46-862 32636 A.T., judgment of 21/03/2002, final on 21/06/2002
The case concerns the lack of a public hearing in two sets of proceedings concerning the applicant’s compensation claims under the Media Act following the publication of statements against him in the weekly publication News (violation of Article 6§1).
General measures: The judgment of the European Court was published in ÖIMR-Newsletter 2002/No.2. At the 810th meeting (October 2002), information was requested on the measures envisaged in respect of the lack of a public hearing during the proceedings under the Media Act.
- 2 cases against Bulgaria
H46-863 50963 Al-Nashif and others, judgment of 20/06/2002, final on 20/09/2002
The case concerns the deportation of the first applicant, a stateless person, to Syria on 4 July 1999. The European Court considered that there had been a violation of the applicants’ right to family life inasmuch as the applicable legal provisions did not give sufficient guarantees against arbitrariness, the first applicant having been deported on the basis of considerations of national security exclusively within the discretionary power of the Minister of the Interior (violation of Article 8). The Court further found that the applicants had not had access to an effective remedy in this respect (violation of Article 13). The case finally concerns the fact that the first applicant had, under the applicable law, been given no opportunity to challenge the lawfulness of his detention while awaiting deportation (violation of Article 5§4).
Individual measures: By letter of 02/12/2002, the applicant's lawyer indicated that he had introduced an application to reopen the judicial proceedings before the Supreme Administrative Court with a view to lifting the ban on his entry to Bulgaria. At the 819th meeting (December 2002), the Bulgarian authorities were invited to keep the Committee informed of the outcome of these proceedings and of other possible measures taken to erase the consequences for the applicant of the violations found by the Court.
General measures: At the 819th meeting (December 2002), the attention of the Bulgarian authorities was drawn to a number of problems in the legislation and regulations which were the basis of the violations found by the European Court in the present case (see notably Articles 46 and 47 of the Aliens Law). Particular attention was drawn to the fact that Bulgarian law does not provide for judicial review of the lawfulness of aliens' detention in case of their expulsion on the grounds of national security (cf. Court's finding under Article 5§4). The Bulgarian authorities have thus been invited to bring the domestic law in line with the Convention so as effectively to prevent new violations similar to those found in the present judgment. It was suggested that the experience of other countries which had been confronted with similar problems in the past be taken into account in planning and adopting the general measures in this case (eg. Chahal against the United Kingdom, judgment of 15/11/1996, Resolution ResDH(2001)119).
H46-864 38361 Anguelova, judgment of 13/06/2002, final on 13/09/2002[66]
Sub-section 4.2
- 2 cases against Cyprus
H46-865 30873 Egmez, judgment of 21/12/00
The case mainly concerns the inhuman treatment inflicted upon the applicant by state officials during his arrest before being admitted to hospital in Larnaca (violation of Article 3) and the absence of an effective remedy in this respect (violation of Article 13). On 01/12/1995, the Attorney General filed at the Nicosia District Court a nolle prosequi in the applicant’s case, in accordance with Article 113.2 of the Constitution. The applicant was released on the same day. On 04/12/1995, the Nicosia District Court discharged the applicant.
Individual measures: The applicant’s lawyer sent a letter to the Secretariat on 19/04/2001 raising several questions about the need to adopt individual measures in this case. In May 2001 the Secretariat forwarded a copy of the letter to the Cypriot authorities. The latter confirmed that they were presently examining the measures that might need to be taken in respect of this case and indicated that the Secretariat would be kept informed in written form of any development in this field.
On 26/09/2002, the Secretariat received a letter from the applicant’s lawyer requesting among other things precise information about the measures presently under examination by the Cypriot authorities. He also requested information as to whether the Attorney-General had instituted criminal proceedings against the officers involved and, if that is not the case, what reasons had been given. Finally, he requested that a copy of his letter be made available to all the Deputies.
General measures: As in the Denizci & others case, also examined under section 4.2, the Cypriot authorities have informed the Committee of Ministers that the judgment of the European Court was disseminated to all institutions concerned (judicial and also police/security forces, Attorney General’s Office, Ombudsman, Cyprus Bar Association). The Ministry of Justice and Ministry of the Interior have requested that appropriate instructions be prepared and distributed to all state officials in order to avoid any future cases of ill-treatment. Instructions prepared by the Attorney General have also been distributed to all authorities concerned. Finally, the judgment has received extensive media coverage in Cyprus. Information about its publication has been requested.
Furthermore, sections 242-243 of the Criminal Code and related parts of the Code of Criminal Procedure have been amended taking into account the findings of the European Court. However, further legislative measures are envisaged. The Cypriot authorities have transmitted to the Secretariat, in written form, details of the above-mentioned information in Greek. An English summary was also transmitted to the Secretariat on 04/10/2002.
The Committee has asked, whether, as far as the violation of Article 13 is concerned and in the light of §§71 and 99 of the Court’s judgment, the Cypriot authorities envisage the adoption of specific measures in order to guarantee that similar violations do not recur.
On 31 October 2002, a bilateral meeting took place between the Cypriot Delegation and the Secretariat. At the meeting, the Secretariat has signalled the issues for which clarifications are needed, and has requested to have this, if possible, in time for the examination of the Egmez and Denizci cases at the 819th meeting.
At the time of preparing this document, no information had been received by the Secretariat.
H46-866 25316+ Denizci and others, judgment of 23/05/01, final on 23/08/01
The case concerns in particular the fact that the applicants (and in the case of the ninth applicant, her son) were subjected to ill-treatment considered inhuman by the European Court (violation of Article 3), that they have been victims of unlawful arrest and detention (violation of Article 5§1) and that they have been subjected to restrictions on their freedom of movement (violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 4).
Individual measures: The Cypriot authorities have stated that the applicants were released from detention. The Committee has asked whether the investigation proceedings, which started in 1995, are still open (§23 of the judgment of the European Court).
Sub-section 4.2
General measures: The Cypriot authorities have informed the Committee of Ministers that the judgment of the European Court was disseminated to all institutions concerned (judicial and also the police force/security forces, the Attorney General’s Office, the Ombudsman, the Cyprus Bar Association). The Ministry of Justice and Ministry of the Interior have requested that appropriate instructions be prepared and distributed to all State officials in order to avoid any future cases of ill-treatment. Instructions prepared by the Attorney General have also been distributed to all authorities concerned. Finally, the judgment has received extensive media coverage in Cyprus. Exact references as to its publication and the dissemination have been requested. The Cypriot authorities have transmitted to the Secretariat, in written form, details of the above-mentioned information in Greek.
Furthermore, sections 242-243 of the Criminal Code and related parts of the code of criminal proceedings were already amended taking into account the findings of the European Court. However, further legislative measures are envisaged. An English summary was also transmitted to the Secretariat on 04/10/2002.
On 30 October 2002, a bilateral meeting took place between the Cypriot Delegation and the Secretariat. At the meeting, the Secretariat has identified the issues for which clarifications are needed, and has requested to have this, if possible, in time for the examination of the Egmez and Denizci cases at the 819th meeting.
At the time of preparing this document, no information had been received by the Secretariat.
- 5 cases against Croatia
H46-867 54727 Cerin, judgment of 15/11/01, final on 15/02/02
H46-868 52634 Futterer, judgment of 20/12/01, final on 20/03/02
H46-869 51585 Horvat, judgment of 26/07/01, final on 26/10/01
H46-870 49706 Rajak, judgment of 28/06/01, final on 12/12/01
H46-871 48771 Delić, judgment of 27/06/2002, final on 27/09/2002
These cases concern the excessive length of certain civil proceedings, which lasted more than 17, 11, 6 and 25 years respectively concerning the first four cases and the Court’s jurisdiction for these cases, taking into account the date of Croatia’s accession to the Convention, extends respectively to 3 years and 11 months; 3 years and 10 months; 3 years and 8 months, and 3 years and 7 months (violations of Article 6§1).
The Delić case concerns several sets of proceedings, most of which have lasted about nine years, of which a period of about 4 years and 6 months falls to be examined by the Court, except a set of proceedings which lasted almost 6 years (of which a period of 1 year, 11 months and 10 days falls to be examined by the Court) and another set which lasted almost 8 years (of which a period of 3 years, 10 months and 12 days falls to be examined by the Court).
The Horvat and the Delic cases also concern the lack of an effective remedy in domestic law, since the formal institution of proceedings upon a complaint lodged with the Constitutional Court depended on the discretion of the latter (violation of Article 13).
Individual measures: In the Rajak case the proceedings were ended by a final judgment of 25/09/2002. In the other cases, the proceedings are still pending and further information is awaited.
General measures: The judgments of the European Court have already been translated, and disseminated to domestic courts. They have also been published on the official Internet site of the Government www.vlada.hr/dokumenti.html and in legal journals.
As regards the violation of Article 13, a new Act amending the Constitutional Act on the Constitutional Court entered into force on 15/03/2002. Section 63 of the Constitutional Act, introduced by this act, provides inter alia that the Constitutional Court must examine a constitutional complaint even before all legal remedies have been exhausted, in cases where a competent court has not decided within a reasonable time a claim concerning the applicant’s rights and obligations, or a criminal charge against him. If the Constitutional Court finds the complaint well-founded it must set a time-limit for deciding the case on the merits and it shall also award compensation for the excessive length of proceedings. In the Radoš case (judgment of 07/11/2002) and in the admissibility decisions in the cases of Jeftić, Plaftak and others, Nogolica and Slaviček, (Applications Nos. 57576/00, 76687/01, 77784/01 and 20862/02 respectively), the European Court found that this new Section provided an effective remedy in respect of complaints concerning excessive length of proceedings.
Sub-section 4.2
The Croatian Government adopted the “Strategy for the Reform of the Judicial System”, a document setting the short-term and long-term objectives for overall judicial reform. The Strategy is intended to be implemented before the end of 2007.
As regards the violation of Article 6§1, a reform of the Act on Civil Procedure is under way. The relevant draft law sets out to reconstruct the system on new principles, but also aims to prevent the abuse of procedural rights and strengthen procedural discipline. The courts’ comments on this draft have been studied by the Ministry of Justice. The draft law has been sent to the Parliament for adoption. Further information on the progress of this draft is awaited.
- 1 case against Finland
H46-872 28856 Jokela, judgment of 21/05/2002, final on 21/08/2002
The case concerns an infringement to the applicants’ general right to peaceful enjoyment of their possessions. A piece of land owned by the spouse and father of the applicants (since deceased) was subject to expropriation. The market value of the land for the expropriation compensation was fixed at 7,50 Finnish Marks per square meter, despite the applicants’ contestations. However, when assessing the inheritance tax to be paid by the applicants for the land at issue, its market value was fixed at 20 Finnish Marks per square meter. The Court considered that the applicants could legitimately expect a reasonably consistent approach from the relevant authorities and the courts in determining the market value of the land or, in the absence of such consistency, an adequate explanation for the different valuations. In this case, there was neither consistency nor explanation for the lack of it (violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1).
General measures: The Finnish authorities have been invited to provide information on their thinking concerning the adequate explanation of how such differences in estimating the market value of land can arise and what measures they envisage in order to avoid them.
- 4 cases against France
H46-152 39594 Kress, judgment of 07/06/01 – Grand Chamber[67]
H46-873 38436 APBP, judgment of 21/03/2002, final on 21/06/2002
Addendum 4
These cases concern infringements of the right to a fair trial on account of the Government Commissioner’s participation in the deliberations of the trial bench in proceedings before the Conseil d’Etat (violations of Article 6§1). The Government Commissioner actually takes no part in voting within the trial bench, as he has already expressed his submissions on the case orally during the hearing. He attends the deliberations and answers, if necessary, any question which might be put to him. On this point, the Court considered that the advantage for the bench of this purely technical assistance by the Government Commissioner in the deliberations “is to be weighed against the higher interest of the litigant, who must have a guarantee that the Government Commissioner cannot, through his presence to influence their outcome.” (see § 85 of the Kress judgment).
The Kress case also concerns the excessive length (10 years, 1 month, 8 days) of the proceedings before administrative courts (violation of Article 6§1).
General measures adopted: the French delegation had sent to the Secretariat a copy of the memorandum addressed to Government Commissioners by the Président de la section du contentieux of the Conseil d’Etat (see Addendum 4), in which it is in particular explained that they may continue to attend deliberations on condition that they do not take the initiative of speaking during the deliberations. The Secretariat considers that this interpretation does not take fully into account the reasoning of the Court (see §§ 81 to 85 of the Kress judgment), and does not prevent new, similar violations.
Sub-section 4.2
H46-874 36515 Fretté, judgment of 26/02/02, final on 26/05/02
The case concerns the unfairness of certain proceedings before the Conseil d’Etat. According to the practice in force at the time of the facts, the applicant, who was not represented, was not summonsed to the hearing; he did not have the opportunity to be informed of the submissions of the Government commissioner and therefore could not answer them. He was thus denied a fair hearing of his case in adversarial proceedings (violation of Article 6§1).
General measures: Since 01/01/2001, all parties have been notified of hearing dates. Following the memorandum presented in the Kress case (q.v., Section 4.2), information concerning concrete measures adopted by the Conseil d’Etat with regard to litigants in person are awaited.
H46-875 36436 Piron, judgment of 14/11/00, final on 14/02/01
The case concerns the excessive length of certain proceedings concerning civil rights and obligations regarding consolidation of parcels of land, before administrative courts. When the Court issued its judgment, these proceedings had already lasted, for the purposes of the Convention, 26 years, 5 months and were still pending (violation of Article 6§1).
The case also concerns an infringement of the applicant’s right to the peaceful enjoyment of her possessions, as she had been deprived of a part of her property in consequence of the same proceedings, without obtaining adequate compensation (i.e. for being deprived of her property and for damages resulting from the length of this privation) within a reasonable time (violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1).
Individual measures: It has been suggested, since the first examination of the case at the 749th meeting (April 2001), that a particular attention be paid to closing the case at national level (the proceedings lasted 26 years and 5 months for the purposes of the Convention, but actually more than 35 years). At the 764th meeting (September 2001), the Representative of France stated that the case was pending before the Conseil d’Etat. The judgment of the European Court recalls that it was for national tribunals to evaluate the material damage. By a letter dated 13/06/2002, the Representative of France stated that the case was still pending before the Conseil d’Etat because the applicant was not satisfied with the sum proposed by the competent authority (Commission d’aménagement foncier).
General measures: Information has been requested, most recently at the 819th meeting, concerning the running and the workload of commissions responsible for consolidating parcels of land. This information is awaited.
- 1 case against Germany
H46-876 33900 P.S., judgment of 20/12/2001, final on 04/09/2002[68]
This case concerns the violation of the applicant’s right to a fair trial in that he was unable to question or to have questioned the principal prosecution witness. The applicant was convicted on 10 January 1994 of a sexual offence against a child and sentenced to seven months’ imprisonment suspended (violation of Article 6§3d taken in conjunction with Article 6§1).
Individual measures: The German authorities were asked whether it would be possible to mention the conclusion of the judgment of the European Court in the applicant’s criminal record.
General measures: The judgment of the European Court has been disseminated to the judicial authorities concerned; publication of the judgment still to be confirmed.
- 1 case against Greece
H46-877 47541 Vasilopoulou, judgment of 21/03/02, final on 21/06/02[69]
Sub-section 4.2
- 2 cases against Ireland
H46-880 36887 Quinn, judgment of 21/12/00, final on 21/03/01
H46-881 34720 Heaney and McGuinness, judgment of 21/12/00, final on 21/03/01
These cases concern in particular the failure to respect the applicants’ right to remain silent and not to incriminate themselves (violation of Article 6§1) and the consequent breach of the presumption of their innocence (violation of Article 6§2). The applicants, remanded in custody on suspicion of having committed terrorist acts, were initially informed by the police that they had the right to remain silent. However, charges subsequently laid against them included that of refusing to answer questions under the terms of Article 52 of the 1939 Offences against the State Act. In the subsequent criminal proceedings, they were found not guilty of the substantive charges but convicted and sentenced (June 1991 in the Heaney & McGuinness case, and May 1997 in the Quinn case) to six months’ imprisonment for having refused to answer questions while on remand, under the terms of the above-mentioned Article 52.
Individual measures: The applicant in the Quinn case has brought proceedings, which are pending before the High Court, seeking inter alia to have his conviction quashed. As regards the Heaney & McGuinness case, the Court of Criminal Appeal has not received any communication from the applicants’ solicitors with a view to taking any procedural steps necessary to determine the appeal. Information as to the outcome of the proceedings at the domestic level in the Quinn case has been requested.
The Secretariat has requested information on any individual measure envisaged e.g. the deletion of the conviction or, at least, the annotation of the records with the conclusion of the judgment of the European Court in the applicants’ criminal records.
General measures: the Irish authorities have informed the Committee of Ministers that under the Good Friday Peace Agreement of 10 April 1998, reforms of the Offences against the State Act 1939 are envisaged. In this respect the Minister of Justice, Equality and Law Reform has established a committee to examine all aspects of the 1939 Acts and to report to the Minister with recommendations for reform. The final report of the Review Group on the 1939 Offences Against the State Act was submitted to the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law reform at the beginning of 2002. A copy of the Report was submitted to the Secretariat in August 2002. In Chapter VIII of the Report (pp 183 to 212), the problems raised under the Quinn and Heaney & McGuinness cases have been extensively examined by the committee, which has recommended, inter alia, that section 52 of the 1939 Act and section 2 of the 1972 Act (having amended the 1939 Act) the be repealed. The Committee of Ministers has asked to be kept informed of any development in this field, in particular whether following the recommendations of the review committee, the Irish authorities envisaged the introduction of amendments to the existing legislation. Finally, the judgments of the European Court are now accessible on the Irish Courts Service website (www.courts.ie) and are also available in legal libraries.
- 17 cases against Italy
H46-882 35972 Grande Oriente d’Italia di Palazzo Giustiniani, judgment of 02/08/01,
final on 12/12/01[70]
The case notably concerns a disproportionate interference with the freedom of association of the applicant, an Italian Masonic association affiliated to the Universal Freemasons, on account of the obligation for candidates to public offices in the Marches region to declare that they are not members of the Freemasons. The European Court concluded that this restriction, established by Article 5 of Marches Regional Law No. 34 of 1996, was not necessary in a democratic society nor was it justified by the character of the public office concerned by the law (violation of Article 11).
General measures: the attention of the Italian authorities was drawn to the need to modify or abrogate Article 5§2, point (e) of Marches Regional Law No. 34/1996. The question was also raised of whether similar provisions existed in other regional laws. The Italian authorities were furthermore invited to ensure the publication of the judgment of the European Court.
Sub-section 4.2
H32-884 23924 C.A.R. srl, Interim Resolution DH(98)154
The case concerns the fact that the applicant company was unable, for a three-year period between 1991 and 1994, to secure the eviction of tenants for non-payment of rent despite the fact that it had obtained a court order to that effect. The Prefect of Latium refused to provide police assistance to evict a group of Somali refugees illegally occupying buildings belonging to the applicant company. It also concerns the absence of compensation from the State for the financial damage the applicant company suffered as a result of the authorities’ inaction.
On 18/06/1998, the Deputies decided, accepting the reasoning of the Commission, that there had been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1: the Prefect’s refusal could be considered justified in the general interest but the violation was due to the absence of a right of compensation for the prejudice suffered in terms of both unpaid rent and damage to the property during the period of non-execution, in connection with the refugee’s occupation of the property until the administrative authorities had found them alternative accommodation.
General measures: Information has been requested with regard to the general measures envisaged in order to ensure a right to compensation in cases similar to that of C.A.R., notably in the light of the decision of the Rome Court of Appeal of 16/05/2000, rejecting the applicant’s request for reparation of the prejudice suffered. At the 819th meeting, a copy of this judgment was requested.
H32-885 22716 P.G. II, Interim Resolutions DH(97)18 and ResDH(2002)58
Addendum 4
The case concerns the impossibility in Italian law to rehabilitate a person declared bankrupt before a minimum 5-year term has expired. The applicant was accordingly refused an earlier rehabilitation, in spite of the fact that he had been declared bankrupt while he was a minor and de facto had no appointed guardian or legal representative (violation of Article 8).
General measures: the need for legislative changes has been raised since 1998: it has been suggested that the law should be made more flexible to allow for exceptions, subject to judicial supervision, in cases such as this. By letter of 26/06/2000, the Italian Delegation informed the Secretariat that the period of incapacity imposed on bankrupts would probably be modified, in the context of an envisaged reform of the bankruptcy law. The attention of the Italian authorities was drawn, however, to the fact that it was not the length of the period of incapacity that was at issue in this case, but the rigidity of the system, leaving no discretion to authorise derogation in special circumstances. In addition the publication of the Commission’s report was requested, but has not yet been confirmed. By letter of 18/02/2002, the Italian authorities indicated that, in January 2002, the legislative Office of the Italian Ministry of Justice had transmitted the decision in the case P.G. II to the President of a Commission set up to draft new bankruptcy legislation, pointing out the necessity of incorporating in the draft provisions that will allow Italy to comply with its obligations resulting from the Committee of Ministers’ decision in this case. An Interim Resolution, ResDH(2002)58 (see Addendum 4) was adopted in April 2002, inviting the Italian authorities to adopt without further delay the necessary measures in order to prevent new similar violations. At that occasion, the Committee of Ministers decided to resume consideration of this issue once the new legislation was adopted or, at the latest, at its first meeting in 2003. A Bill (S/1243) aimed at amending Royal Decree No. 267/42 on the bankruptcy law was presented in March 2002 and assigned to the Senate Justice Committee, but it has not been debated yet.
Sub-section 4.2
- Cases against Italy concerning the monitoring of prisoners’ correspondence
H54-886 15211 Diana Calogero, judgment of 15/11/96, Interim Resolution ResDH(2001)178
H54-887 15943 Domenichini, judgment of 15/11/96, Interim Resolution ResDH(2001)178
H46-888 39920 Di Giovine, judgment of 26/07/01, final on 26/10/01
H46-889 25498 Messina Antonio 2, judgment of 28/09/00, final on 28/12/00
H46-318 26161 Natoli, judgment of 09/01/01[71]
H46-890 31543 Rinzivillo, judgment of 21/12/00, final on 21/03/01, Interim Resolution ResDH(2001)178
Addendum 4
These cases mainly concern violations of Article 8 of the Convention on account of the lack of clarity of Italian law on the monitoring of prisoners’ correspondence (law No. 354/75), which leaves too much leeway to the public authorities, particularly in respect of the duration of monitoring measures and the reasons justifying such measures, authorises the monitoring of correspondence with the organs of the European Convention on Human Rights and provides for no effective remedy against decisions ordering the monitoring of correspondence (violation of Article 13 in cases Diana and Domenichini).
In the Domenichini case, the Court also found a violation of Article 6§3 because one of the applicant’s letters to his lawyer had been intercepted while penal proceedings were still pending, thus impairing his defence rights.
The Messina Antonio 2 case also concerns the lack of effective remedies against the restrictions resulting from the special prison regime (Section 41bis of the Prison Administration Act n° 354/75) to which he was subject (violation of Article 13).
General measures: In December 2001, the Committee of Ministers adopted Interim Resolution ResDH(2001)178, urging the Italian authorities rapidly to adopt the legislative reform required fully to ensure that Italian law complies with the Convention on the points raised by the Court; it decided to resume consideration of the issue once the process of amending law No. 354/75 had been completed or, at the latest, at its first meeting in 2003. It noted with satisfaction the provisional measures already taken, which are summarised in the above-mentioned Interim Resolution (see Addendum 4).
A Presidential Decree on penitentiary organisation entered into force on 06/09/2000, Article 38§11 of which provides that correspondence addressed to international human rights organisations should be exempt from monitoring. As regards the other problems highlighted by the Court in these judgments, a new Bill (No. 2675/C) aimed at amending the law on monitoring of prisoners’ correspondence has been presented to the Chamber of Deputies in April 2002.
Furthermore, the Domenichini judgment (the section “The law”) was translated and published in the Italian legal journal Rivista internazionale dei diritti dell’uomo (1997, vol. II, p. 119-124) and, in March and April 1999, the Italian Ministry of Justice addressed circular letters to Presidents and Public Prosecutors of Appeal Courts, drawing their attention to the requirements of Article 8 of the Convention, as established in the case-law of the European Court of Human rights about monitoring of prisoners’ correspondence, and to the prison authorities, giving them guidelines on how to comply with the above-mentioned requirements. However, it results from the Natoli judgment (§15) that letters between the applicant and his lawyers were in fact submitted to monitoring measures even after the issuing of the circulars and in spite of the fact that Article 103 of the code of the criminal procedure, as amended in 1989, prohibits such control.
As regards the effectiveness of remedies to check the lawfulness of restrictions imposed on prisoners, the Italian authorities informed the Secretariat, by letter of 04/12/2000, that the Messina Antonio 2 judgment had been translated, published in the legal magazine Documenti Giustizia and communicated to the authorities concerned, and that the Department for Penitentiary Administration would consider possible measures to prevent new violations of Article 13, similar to those found by the Court in this case (§§ 84-97 of the judgment). Information has been requested as to the result of these reflections.
Sub-section 4.2
- Italian cases concerning the failure to enforce judicial eviction orders against tenants
H46-891 22774 Immobiliare Saffi, judgment of 28/07/99 - Grand Chamber
H32-892 20177 Aldini, Interim Resolution DH(97)413
H46-893 22534 A.O., judgment of 30/05/00, final on 30/08/00
H46-894 22671 G.L. IV, judgment of 03/08/00, final on 03/11/00
H46-895 21463 Lunari, judgment of 11/01/01, final on 11/04/01
H46-896 24650 P.M., judgment of 11/01/01, final on 12/09/01
H46-897 15919 Palumbo Edoardo, judgment of 30/11/00, final on 01/03/01
H46-898 23424 Tanganelli, judgment of 11/01/01, final on 11/04/01
These cases mainly concern the sustained impossibility for the applicants to obtain the assistance of the police in order to enforce judicial decisions ordering their tenants’ eviction, owing to the implementation of legislation providing for the suspension or staggering of evictions. The European Court concluded that a fair balance had not been struck between the protection of the applicants’ right of property and the requirements of the general interest (violations of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1). In some of these cases, the Court also concluded that, as a result of the legislation at issue, rendering eviction orders nugatory, the applicants had been deprived of their right to have their disputes decided by a court, contrary to the principle of the rule of law (violation of Article 6§1). All the applicants recovered their apartments between 1992 and 2000, i.e. between 5 and 16 years after the eviction decisions had been issued.
75 further cases similar to these, having led to the conclusion of friendly settlements, have been examined to date by the Committee of Ministers.
General measures: A new law was adopted in December 1998 (Law No. 431/98 “Regulations concerning the renting and the repossession of housing”), which sets – inter alia – the conditions, modalities and deadlines for the enforcement of eviction decisions. The Director General of human rights asked, as early as September 1999, to have information with regard to the concrete measures adopted to implement this legislation as well as some data confirming the effectiveness of the new measures.
By letter of 19/06/2001, the Italian authorities informed the Committee that the Ministry for Home Affairs was approaching the other competent departments in order to identify further and more effective measures, both on the administrative and legislative level, notably with a view to simplifying the proceedings.
At the 775th bis meeting (January 2002), the Representative of Italy indicated that some implementation problems still existed in practice, notably in some major towns, but were on their way to being solved. However, in August 2002 a new law (No. 185/02) suspended the implementation of eviction orders until 30/06/2003.
In addition, the Immobiliare Saffi judgment has been published in the legal journal Rivista internazionale dei diritti dell’uomo, No. 1/2000, P. 252-265.
- 1 case against Moldova
H46-900 45701 Metropolitan Church of Bessarabia and others, judgment of 13/12/01,
final on 27/03/02[72]
Addendum 4
The case concerns the failure of the Government to recognise the Metropolitan Church of Bessarabia. The Court concluded that this non-recognition constituted an interference with the applicants’ right to freedom of religion and that this interference, although pursuing a legitimate aim, was not “necessary in a democratic society” and thus not justified under the Convention (violation of Article 9). The Court also concluded that the applicants did not enjoy an effective remedy in respect of their claims at domestic level (violation of Article 13).
Individual measures: On 31/07/2002, the Government's agent indicated to the Secretariat that the competent authorities had recognised the Metropolitan Church of Bessarabia (recognition certificate No.1651 of 30/07/2002) in accordance with the Moldovan law on Religious Denominations, as amended on 12/07/2002 (see below). This recognition would appear to erase the consequences of the violation of the Convention in the present case, as regards in particular the legal personality of the Church and, consequently, its right to peaceful enjoyment of its possessions.
Sub-section 4.2
At the 806th meeting (September 2002), the Representative of Moldova stated that the Church would be able – like other religious communities – to participate in the procedures defined by a Governmental decision of 10/06/2002 (this decision appears in Addendum 4) with a view to recognition of its property. Confirmation in this respect has been requested in writing.
Subsequently, the applicants contacted the Secretariat alleging problems with regard to their property claims. They furthermore challenged the Government's decree of 26/09/2001, which states that Metropolitan Church of Moldova is a legal successor of Metropolitan Church of Bessarabia, and certain new provisions of the Criminal Code relating to illegal occupation of religious buildings.
In view of these allegations, the Moldovan delegation was requested at the 810th meeting (October 2002) to provide the Secretariat in writing with clarifications concerning the articulation of the above-mentioned texts and their practical impact on the applicant church, notably with regard to enjoyment of its property rights. At the time of issuing the present annotated agenda, the Secretariat had not yet received these clarifications.
General measures: The Moldovan authorities informed the Committee of Ministers that the original version of the judgment of the European Court and its official translation into Moldovan were published on 09/07/2002 in the Official Journal of Moldova (Monitorul Oficial, n°100).
The Moldovan authorities also indicated that the Moldovan legislation on religious denominations was amended by Law n°1220-XV which entered into force on 12/07/2002. The relevant provisions (articles 9, 14, 49 and 52) of the Law, as amended, appear in Addendum 4.
The new provisions (Article 14) provide among other things that religious denominations are free to organise themselves and can function after depositing a declaration and their statutes with the competent authority, which will register the denomination in question in the State Register of Religious Denominations within 30 days following the deposit. Such recognition can be declared void though judicial proceedings in case of violation of the conditions provided for in Article 9 (§3). The latter prohibits religious denominations from conducting activities which undermine the independence, sovereignty, integrity and security of the Republic of Moldova, as well as the Constitution and the legislation in force, or to undertake actions connected with political activities.
Article 325 of the Code of Civil Procedure has also been amended so as to allow the reopening of domestic civil proceedings following violations of the Convention found by the European Court. The Moldovan authorities moreover recalled that a similar provision (Article 369/2, 1i) has been in existence since June 2000 in the Code of Criminal Procedure (see Addendum 4).
Following the adoption of the new law, the attention of the Moldovan authorities was drawn to the fact that the requirement of proportionality embodied in the Convention did not appear to be included in articles 9§3 and 14 which set out the conditions under which the Moldovan authorities can cancel the recognition of a religion. It was furthermore noted that the new law was not absolutely clear and detailed with regard to the right of a religious community to take judicial proceedings against the authorities' decision to cancel the recognition of this religion. This lack of clarity could prejudice the effective judicial control required by Article 13 and, consequently, the effective prevention of new violations similar to those found in the present case. This analysis was shared by the independent experts who had been mandated, upon the request of the Moldovan authorities and within the framework of the Targeted Co-operation Programme to assist in the implementation of commitments, to assess the compatibility of the new Law on Religious Denominations (as amended) with Council of Europe standards, notably the ECHR.
During the consideration of this case at the 806th meeting (September 2002), the Representative of Moldova indicated that, following the aforementioned expert examination, the Minister of Justice had set up a working party to draw up an entirely new version of the law which would remedy the aforementioned problems. At the 810th meeting (October 2002), the Representative of Moldova stated that the work on the new draft law was progressing and that a copy of the draft would be submitted to the Secretariat as soon as it is finalised.
Sub-section 4.2
- 2 cases against the Russian federation
H46-902 59498 Burdov, judgment of 07/05/2002, final on 04/09/2002[73]
The case concerns the non-execution in full or in part over several years by the Russian social authorities of final decisions delivered in 1997-2000 by the Shakhty City Court (Rostov region) which ordered them to pay the applicant compensation for damage to his health sustained during his participation in emergency operations at the Chernobyl nuclear plant (violations of Articles 6 and of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1). The amounts owed were paid on 05/03/2001.
General measures: During the examination of the case at 810th (October, 2002) and 819th (December, 2002) meetings, the Russian authorities informed the Committee of the following measures adopted in response to the European Court's judgment:
- publication of the judgment in Rossijskaia Gazeta and its wide dissemination with a view to ensuring that the competent authorities may comply therewith;
- payment of arrears because of the non-execution, as in the Burdov case, of domestic judgments ordering the payment of allowances for the victims of Chernobyl (a total of 284,6 million rubles were paid between January and October 2002);
- execution of 5128 other domestic judgments concerning the indexation of the allowances for the victims of Chernobyl and allocation of the necessary budgetary means (378,6 million rubles for 2002 and 260 million rubles for 2003) to social security bodies to allow them to meet the obligations arising from these judgments;
- Amendment of the Laws governing the mandatory social insurance of the professional accidents and professional diseases with a view to providing for a new system of indexation of allowances paid in accordance with these laws (the indexation will be henceforth based on the inflation rate used for calculation of the federal budget);
The Russian authorities furthermore indicated that the aforementioned system of allowances' indexation would be shortly made applicable to the allowances paid to Chernobyl victims. Specific legislation to that effect was to be submitted before Parliament by mid December 2002. The final adoption of the latter legislation has not yet been confirmed.
The Russian authorities were invited to provide the Secretariat with a copy of new provisions governing the indexation of the relevant social allowances. The particular importance of this legislation was again stressed (cf. letter of the Director General of Human Rights sent on 26/09/2002 to the Representative of the Russian Federation before the Court). It was also suggested that in tackling the problem of non-execution of domestic judgments the Russian authorities take into account the solutions adopted by other Contracting states which had been previously confronted with this problem (eg. the reinforcement of civil, administrative and criminal responsibility for non-execution of judgments, providing for a possibility of forcible execution of judgment against the State through seizure of property, etc.).
Following the debate, satisfaction was expressed in the Committee on account of the speedy and positive response given by the Russian Federation to the Burdov judgment, consisting inter alia in the enforcement of over 5000 outstanding domestic court decisions similar to the one here at issue and the current adoption of other comprehensive general measures to prevent similar violations.
It was recalled that the Committee had considered from the outset that the present judgment was among those which warranted the Committee's special attention given the large number of similar complaints which could be lodged with the Court. It was therefore stressed that the rapid and efficient execution of such judgments under the Committee's supervision was of the utmost importance to prevent repetitive complaints.
Sub-section 4.2
H46-903 47095 Kalashnikov, judgment of 15/07/2002, final on 15/10/2002
The case concerns the poor conditions of the applicant's pre-trial detention between 1995 and 2000 which was found by the European Court to amount to degrading treatment, due in particular to severe prison overcrowding and an unsanitary environment; and its detrimental effect on the applicant's health and well-being, combined with the length of the period during which the applicant was detained in these conditions (violation of Article 3). The case also concerns the excessive length of this detention (1 year, 2 months falling within the Court's jurisdiction - violation of Article 5§3) and the excessive length of criminal proceedings brought against the applicant (1 year, 10 months falling within the Court's jurisdiction - violation of Article 6§1).
General measures: During the first examination of the case at the 819th meeting (December, 2002), the Russian delegation stated that a number of improvements had been and continued to be made as regards the conditions of pre-trial detention in the Russian Federation. They indicated in particular that:
- from October 2001 to October 2002 the overcrowding of pre-trial detention facilities has largely decreased, mostly through reducing the overall number of detainees (from 199 000 to 137 000) as a result of the entry into force of the new Code of Criminal Procedure on 01/07/2002;
- in 2002 some 838 new places were created in pre-trial detention facilities;
- the number of persons committed to detention on remand per month has decreased from 10 000 in 2001 to 3 700 in September-October 2002
- as a result of the above measures, the living space per detainee was increased to 3,46 m². In 26 of 89 Russian regions the number of persons held in pre-trial detention does not exceed the limits set for detention facilities;
The Russian Delegation furthermore indicated that the Ministry of Justice had published in its professional review in November 2002 those extracts from the CPT reports which concern the detention facilities placed under the responsibility of this Ministry (including pre-trial detention facilities).
As regards the excessive length of pre-trial detention and criminal proceedings, the Russian authorities indicated that the new Code of Criminal Procedure is instrumental in preventing new, similar violations as it imposes stricter time-limits on investigation and trial. Following the Kalashnikov judgment, a circular letter was sent by the Vice-Chairman of the Supreme Court to all Russian courts requiring strict compliance with the time-limits.
The European Court's judgment furthermore was published in the daily Rossijskaia Gazeta (17 and 19 October 2002) and in many other Russian legal journals.
The Deputies took note of the information provided and the Russian authorities were invited to keep the Committee informed of further measures adopted to prevent fresh violations of the Convention, in particular with regard to the conditions of pre-trial detention.
- 28 cases against Turkey
H46-904 40035 Jabari, judgment of 11/07/00, final on 11/10/00
This case concerns the deportation of the applicant to Iran, where, she maintained, she would have run the risk of being flogged or stoned to death, these being the penalties prescribed by Iranian law as punishment for adultery. Her asylum application was rejected by the Police, on the grounds that it had been submitted out of the 5-day time-limit as from her arrival in Turkey. However, she was later granted refugee status by the UNHCR. Seised by the applicant, the Administrative Court, which limited itself to the issue of the formal legality of the refusal because the application had been submitted out of time, nevertheless concluded that the decision of the police was not clearly unlawful and that its implementation would not have resulted for the applicant in damage which would have been impossible to compensate. The European Court considered that there would have been a real risk of the applicant being subjected to treatment contrary to Article 3 if she had been returned to Iran (violation of article 3 if deportation order executed). The Court also decided that no effective remedy had been granted to the applicant: there was no assessment made by the national authorities of the risk the applicant claimed to run; the judicial control by the Council of State was too limited to constitute an effective remedy and that no possibility of suspending the implementation of the execution had existed (violation of Article 13).
Sub-section 4.2
Individual measures: Following the judgment of the European Court, the applicant was granted a Turkish residence permit. She obtained a Canadian visa, in September 2001.
General measures: The regulations on asylum seekers was modified in 1998 to increase the five-day period in which appeals against political asylum rejection may be lodged, to ten days. Moreover, the judgment of the European Court has been translated and published. Explanations concerning how Turkish Law guarantees respect of the requirements of Article 13 of the ECHR were requested. Concerning the violation of Article 13, reference has been made to the possibility of suspending the implementation of a deportation order, in particular if it is clearly unlawful (Article 125 of the Constitution of Turkey). The question of the effectiveness of this rule and its application, in the light of the requirements of Article 13 of the ECHR, has also been raised. Information is also awaited concerning the guarantees offered to ensure that in all appeals – even those submitted out of time – against a measure of removal involving a risk of treatment contrary to Article 3, an examination of the substance of the case is actually carried out.
H46-905 36590 Göç Mehmet, judgment of 11/07/2002 - Grand Chamber
The case concerns the breach of the applicant’s right to a fair trial, first on account of the absence of an oral hearing in the domestic proceedings concerning his compensation claim for two days’ detention, lodged in accordance with Law No. 466 (on compensation for unlawful detention and arrest), and of the non-communication of the Principal Public Prosecutor’s written opinion to the applicant during the appeal procedure before the Court of cassation (violations of Article 6§1).
General measures: By a letter of 15/01/2003, the Turkish authorities indicated that a new provision was added by Law No. 4778 to Article 316 of the Code of Criminal Procedure requiring notification of written opinions of the Principal Public Prosecutor to parties by the competent chamber of the Court of cassation. Information is awaited on the measures envisaged in respect of absence of an oral hearing during proceedings under Law No. 466. The publication of the judgment of the European Court has been requested.
- 21 cases of freedom of expression
(CM/Inf(2000)28-rev 3 and Addendum, CM/Inf(2001)7, Interim Resolution
Addendum 4
H54-906 22678 Inçal, judgment of 09/06/98
H46-907 23462 Arslan, judgment of 08/07/99
H46-908 23536+ Baskaya and Okçuoğlu, judgment of 08/07/99
H46-909 23556 Ceylan, judgment of 08/07/99
H46-910 25067+ Erdoğdu and Ince, judgment of 08/07/99
H46-911 24919 Gerger, judgment of 08/07/99
H46-912 23168 Karataş, judgment of 08/07/99
H46-913 24246 Okçuoğlu, judgment of 08/07/99
H46-914 23500 Polat, judgment of 08/07/99
H46-827 26680 Şener, judgment of 18/07/00[74]
H46-915 24122 Sürek II, judgment of 08/07/99
H46-916 24762 Sürek IV, judgment of 08/07/99
H46-917 23927+ Sürek and Özdemir, judgment of 08/07/99
H46-918 22479 Öztürk, judgment of 28/09/99
H32-848 25658 Aslantaş Sedat, Interim Resolution DH(99)560[75]
H46-840 23144 Özgür Gündem, judgment of 16/03/00,[76]
H46-764 25723 Erdoğdu, judgment of 15/06/00[77]
Sub-section 4.2
H46-820 28635+ Aksoy Ibrahim, judgment of 10/10/00, final on 10/01/01[78]
H46-919 28496 E.K., judgment of 07/02/02, final on 07/05/02
H46-640 29590 Yağmurdereli, judgment of 04/06/2002, final on 04/09/2002[79]
H46-639 33179 Karataş Seher, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002[80]
These cases all relate to unjustified interferences with the applicants’ freedom of expression, in particular because of their conviction by State Security Courts following the publication of articles and books or the preparation of messages addressed to a public audience. In the Özgür Gündem case, the Court also concluded that the search operation conducted in the applicant newspaper’s premises had not been necessary in a democratic society and that the respondent Government had failed to comply with their positive obligation to protect the applicant newspaper in the exercise of its freedom of expression (violation of Article 10)[81].
Individual measures: since June 1998 it has in particular been repeatedly stressed in the Committee that the applicants’ convictions found to be contrary to Article 10 must be erased from the applicants’ criminal records and that the applicants’ civil and political rights, to the extent that they have been restricted as a result of the convictions, must be restored. The Turkish authorities indicated that this result could be achieved by introducing in the code of criminal procedure the possibility of reopening proceedings found to be contrary to the Convention. Although this amendment was announced in September 1999 and the Committee of Ministers had constantly stressed its urgency, in March 2001 the Turkish authorities indicated that its adoption was only scheduled for 2003-2004[82]. Pending this reform, on 23 July 2001, the Committee of Ministers adopted Interim Resolution ResDH(2001)106 (appended to Addendum 4), which, among other things, “urges the Turkish authorities, without further delay, to take ad hoc measures allowing the consequences of the applicants’ convictions contrary to the Convention in the above mentioned cases to be rapidly and fully erased”.
Updated information on the current situation of the applicants and on the concrete follow-up given to Interim Resolution ResDH(2001)106 as well as on the possible implications of the amendment of Article 87 of the Constitution (as regards pardons and amnesties) have been requested. By letter of 27/05/2002, the Turkish authorities indicated that six applicants (Mr M.S. Okçuoğlu, Mr U. Erdoğdu, Mr S. Ince, Ms P. Şener, Mr K.T. Sürek, Mr Y. Özdemir) were no longer subject to restrictions of their rights and that eleven among the remaining applicants (Mr Ibrahim Aksoy, Mr Arslan, Mr Gerger, Mr Karataş, Mr A.Z. Okçuoğlu, Mr Polat, Mr Baskaya, Mr Aslantaş, Mr Ceylan, Mr Inçal, Mr Öztürk) could now avail themselves of the remedies normally provided for by Turkish law. On 03/08/2002, the Turkish Parliament adopted provisions allowing for the reopening of civil and criminal proceedings found to be contrary to the Convention (Act No. 4709). These provisions however did not apply to these cases, as their scope was limited to European Court judgments on applications brought after 09/08/2003. An amendment, extending reopening possibilities, within one year, to court judgments already finalised has just been adopted by the Turkish Parliament.
General measures: the question has been raised, since 1998, of the necessity to adapt Turkish law to the requirements of the Convention in order to avoid further violations similar to those found (see CM/Inf(2000)28-rev. 3 for details). As a preliminary measure, the most important judgments have been published in Turkish and some of them can be accessed through the Ministry of Justice website (http://www.adalet.gov.tr/aihm/aihmk.htm). Furthermore, at the 741st meeting (February 2001), the Representative of Turkey indicated that an information note would be sent to judges and public prosecutors in order to raise their awareness of the requirements of the Convention. A copy of this note has been requested. Additional information on a training programme aimed at raising the awareness of the judiciary of the requirements of the Convention was communicated in April 2001.
Sub-section 4.2
In March 2001, the Turkish authorities presented the National Programme containing information on the reforms planned for the “short term” and the “medium term” (respectively 2002 and 2003-2004). Subsequently, on 03/10/2001, a number of constitutional amendments, concerning inter alia the provisions on freedom of expression and information, were adopted and are directly applicable. Since then, a series of packages of laws have been adopted respectively on 06/02/2002, 26/03/2002, 03/08/2002 and 02/01/2003, amending notably Articles 159 and 312 of the Criminal Code, Articles 7 and 8 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (No. 3713), the Press Act (No. 5680), the Political Parties Act (No. 2820) and the Broadcasting Act (No. 3984). Although these amendments are aimed at generally improving the situation of freedom of expression (in some cases, maximum penalties are lowered and the scope of the provisions restricted), they do not seem to solve all the problems raised by the Court’s judgments. Additional information has accordingly been requested on a number of points, including: the way Turkish Courts apply the criterion of “incitement to violence” after the legislative reforms; the introduction of a general criterion of truth and public interest; the review of minimum penalties in crimes related to freedom of expression; the amendment or abrogation to Article 6 of the Anti-Terrorism law; the adoption of specific measures aimed at ensuring the protection of freedom of expression. Finally, at the 792nd meeting, the Turkish authorities were invited to clarify the expected impact of the reforms on freedom of expression in Turkey. By letters of 16/12/2002 and 03/01/2003, the Turkish authorities provided examples of the case-law of the Court of Cassation and Security courts, concerning the application of Articles 312 and 159 of the Criminal Code, after the entry into force of the abovementioned reforms.
- 5 Friendly settlements in cases against Turkey concerning freedom of expression and containing undertakings of the Turkish Government
(Interim Resolution ResDH(2001)106
Addendum 4
H46-920 32985 Altan, judgment of 14/05/02 - Friendly settlement
H46-921 35076 Erol Ali, judgment of 20/06/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46-922 25753 Özler, judgment of 11/07/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46-831 26976+ Sürek Kamil Tekin V, judgment of 16/07/2002 - Friendly settlement[83]
H46-923 27307 Bayrak Mehmet, judgment of 03/09/2002 - Friendly settlement
These cases all relate in particular to alleged unjustified interferences with the applicants’ freedom of expression, on account of their conviction by State Security Courts following public speeches or the publication of articles and books (complaints under Article 10 and 6§1).
The Court took note of the friendly settlements reached between the parties. The Turkish Government undertook to pay a sum of money to the applicants, to implement all necessary reform of domestic law and practice in order to bring the Turkish Law into conformity with the requirements of the Convention in the area of freedom of expression and to adopt the individual measures set out in Interim Resolution ResDH(2001)106, adopted on 23/07/2001(appended to Addendum 4), in order rapidly and fully to erase the consequences of the applicants’ conviction. These cases are comparable to the 21 “freedom of expression” cases against Turkey under Section 4.2 of this annotated agenda and order of business.
Individual Measures: information is expected on the current situation of the applicants as well as on the measures envisaged, in conformity with the undertakings included in the friendly settlements, in order rapidly and fully to erase the consequences of the applicants’ conviction.
General Measures: see above (“freedom of expression” cases against Turkey).
Sub-section 4.2
- 11 cases against the United Kingdom
H54-924 25599 A., judgment of 23/09/98
The case concerns the failure of the state to protect the applicant from ill-treatment (1993-1994) by his step-father (violation of Article 3).
General measures: newspaper coverage has been extensive. The publication of the European Court’s judgment in a legal journal is still to be confirmed.
As regards the legislative change, which the United Kingdom authorities had undertaken to have adopted (see paragraph 24 of the judgment), the Secretariat received a copy of the Consultation Paper on the Physical Punishment of Children prepared by the United Kingdom authorities. Answers to the questions raised in this paper were ready by mid-2001. It was indicated that the answers should be the basis for further discussions on possible legislative changes to be introduced.
Subsequently, at the 775th meeting (December 2001) the United Kingdom authorities indicated that the Human Rights Act would suffice to prevent the recurrence of a breach of the kind found by the Court in this case so that no special legislative change is necessary. However, this new approach raised the question as to how parents, in the absence of a clear legislative change, would be made aware of the new standard.
At the 819th meeting (December 2002) the United Kingdom Representative responded that ministers have asked the Attorney General to continue his review of the use of the “reasonable chastisement” defence. His report of May 2002 suggested that it was indeed being used reasonably. Furthermore steps had been taken to support families through promoting positive parenting, such as an HM Treasury announcement of a 25 million-pounds (37 million Euro) three-year programme to support parents though the voluntary sector.
The National Family and Parenting Institute, which is government-funded, has launched a video and leaflet “From Breakfast to Bedtime”. This provides tips for parents on how to cope with “meltdown moments” with toddlers. Both parents and professionals have received it very well and NFPI is having to produce additional copies to meet demand. It deliberately avoids any mention of smacking since preliminary research with parents found that the positive parenting messages were much better received on their own.
Ministers are aware that the smacking rules are different in Wales and Scotland where there is a total ban on childminders using corporal punishment, and are listening carefully to what others are saying on these issues. The Government will be reviewing the National Standards this year and this will be the opportunity for making any changes.
In view of recent case-law evidencing a continuing high degree of tolerance in respect of what violence constitutes “reasonable chastisement” (discussed in particular at the Seminar organised in Strasbourg on 21‑22 November 2002) and the Government’s undertaking before the Court, several Delegations and the Secretariat expressed that, apart from the measures already announced, legislative changes would be needed in this case.
The Committee has asked to be kept informed of any new development in particular as regards legislative change.
H46-668 30668+ Wilson and the National Union of journalists; Palmer, Wyeth and the National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers; Doolan and others, judgment of 02/07/2002, final on 02/10/2002[84]
The case concerns the failure of the state in its positive obligation to secure the enjoyment of the rights under Article 11, by permitting employers to use financial incentives to induce employees to surrender important union rights (violation of Article 11). The individual applicants refused to sign new, individual contracts of employment offering a wage increase in return for renouncing the right to be represented by their trade unions. As a consequence their salaries fell below those of their colleagues who had signed individual contracts.
Sub-section 4.2
General measures: in order to prevent similar violations, the United Kingdom Delegation was asked to provide information as to whether there have been any changes to the UK trade union legislation since the 1993 Act and if not, what changes are envisaged.
H46-669 56547 P., C. and S., judgment of 16/07/2002, final on 16/10/2002[85]
The case concerns measures taken by the local authority of the United Kingdom to protect the applicants’ second child from her mother, previously convicted in the United States, on the basis of medical expertise, of having ill-treated her first child. The European Court found that the applicants had not had effective access to a Court and that the measures had been unfair in that the applicants had had no legal representation in proceedings brought by the local authority in applying for a care order (proceedings started on 02/02/1999) and an order freeing for adoption (proceedings started on 15/03/1999) (violation of Article 6§1). The European Court also found breaches in the applicants’ right to family life due to the removal of the baby from her mother at birth and to the fact that the above-mentioned proceedings prevented the applicants from being involved in decisions to protect their family interests (violations of Article 8). The applicants’ daughter was finally given to adoption on 27/03/2000.
Individual measures: in the light of the violations found in this case, the Committee has asked whether the United Kingdom authorities are envisaging the adoption of any measures.
General measures: the Committee has asked for copies of the Children Act 1989 and the Adoption Act 1976 to be sent to the Secretariat. The publication and wide dissemination of the judgment of the European Court have also been requested.
H46-674 46477 Edwards Paul and Audrey, judgment of 14/03/02, final on 14/06/02[86]
The case concerns a breach of the positive obligation imposed on the national authorities to protect the life of the applicants’ son, who was killed while in custody by another detainee, considered dangerous, who shared the same cell (November 1994). The case also concerns inefficacity of the inquiry into the death of the applicants’ son as it was not possible to oblige prison staff to give evidence and because the applicants were not sufficiently associated with the investigation procedure (violations of Article 2). Finally, it concerns the lack of an effective remedy in this respect (violation of Article 13).
Individual measures: The United Kingdom Delegation has informed the Committee that Mr and Mrs Edwards have now written to the minister to accept his offer of a further investigation into a number of complaints against the Prison Service that they regard as outstanding. The investigation, which will be conducted by a Senior Investigating Officer reporting to the Director General of the Prison Service, will begin early this year and prison staff will be required to co-operate. The Committee has asked to be informed of the outcome of this investigation.
General measures: The Delegation indicated that, as far as the particular violations found in this case, the Prison Service had changed its practice and procedure in order to avoid situations of a similar type.
The Committee has asked to be kept informed of the changes introduced in the practice and procedures of the Prison Service. In respect of Article 13, it has requested clarifications on the type of remedies available.
Publication of the European Court’s judgment and dissemination to the authorities concerned has also been requested.
Sub-section 4.2
H46-675 25680 I., judgment of 11/07/2002 - Grand Chamber[87]
H46-676 28957 Goodwin Christine, judgment of 11/07/2002 - Grand Chamber[88]
These cases concern, in particular, the state’s failure to comply with its positive obligation to ensure the right of the applicants (post-operative, male-to-female transsexuals) to respect for their private life, in particular due to the lack of legal recognition given to their gender re-assignment (violations of Article 8) as well as the impossibility for them to marry a person of the sex opposite to their re-assigned gender (violations of Article 12).
General/individual measures: the United Kingdom authorities have informed the Committee that the Inter-Departmental Working Group on Transsexual People was reconvened to consider the position of transsexual people in general and, since the European Court’s judgments in these cases, has been considering how to implement them. However, the Government was not yet in a position to indicate what measures might be taken as a result of this process. Lastly, the judgments of the European Court have been published in “Sweet & Maxwell” at (2002) 35 EHRR 447.
The Committee has asked whether, pending the adoption of any general measure, the United Kingdom authorities envisage the adoption of any individual measure in these cases.
- Cases concerning the security forces
H46-814 28883 McKerr, judgment of 04/05/01, final on 04/08/01[89]
H46-815 37715 Shanaghan, judgment of 04/05/01, final on 04/08/01[90]
H46-816 24746 Hugh Jordan, judgment of 04/05/01, final on 04/08/01[91]
H46-817 30054 Kelly and others, judgment of 04/05/01, final on 04/08/01[92]
H46-667 43290 McShane, judgment of 28/05/2002, final on 28/08/2002[93]
These cases concern the death of applicants’ next-of-kin during police detention or security forces operations. In this respect, the Court mainly found the following shortcomings in the proceedings for investigating the use of lethal force by police officers/ security forces (violation of Article 2): lack of independence of the investigating police officers from the security forces/police officers involved in the events; lack of public scrutiny and information to the victims’ families concerning the reasons for decisions not to prosecute any soldier / police officer; the inquest procedure did not allow for any verdict or findings which could play an effective role in securing a prosecution in respect of any criminal offence which might have been disclosed; the soldiers / police officers who shot the deceased could not be required to attend the inquest as witnesses; the non-disclosure of witness statements prior to the witnesses’ appearance at the inquest prejudiced the ability of the applicants to participate in the inquest and contributed to long adjournments in the proceedings; the inquest proceedings did not commence promptly and were not pursued with reasonable expedition.
The McShane case also concerns the finding by the Court of a failure by the respondent state to comply with its obligations under Article 34, in that the police had – albeit unsuccessfully – brought disciplinary proceedings against the solicitor who represented the applicant in national proceedings for having disclosed certain witness statements to the applicant’s legal representatives before the European Court.
General measures: Representatives of the United Kingdom and the Secretariat have maintained various contacts in order to discuss the Government’s preliminary position in respect of the measures that need to be adopted.
Sub-section 4.2
The publication of the judgments of the European Court and dissemination to police officers / security officers and judicial authorities concerned are still to be confirmed. Copies of the judgments have been sent to the Director of Public Prosecutions and to all coroners in Northern Ireland.
On 25 September 2002, consultations took place between the Secretariat and representatives of the United Kingdom authorities regarding the measures to be taken. On 07/10/2002, following these consultations, the United Kingdom authorities submitted to the Committee of Ministers a document containing a package of measures (either already adopted or for adoption) with a view to avoiding the repetition of the violations found in these cases. A preliminary examination of this information was made at the 810th meeting (October 2002). The main document was included in Addendum 4, volume 1 of the 819th meeting and the appendix (300 pages) to the document can be obtained from the Secretariat in the original language.
The examination of this document and other relevant information was pursued at the 819th meeting (December 2002) at the close of which the Secretariat was requested to prepare a memorandum summarising the information available. Subsequently, additional information has been received, notably from the applicants’ representatives and the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission. The memorandum, including the additional information submitted, is presented in document CM/Inf(2003)4.
SUB-SECTION 4.3 – SPECIAL PROBLEMS
- 2175 cases against Italy
H46-322 39221+ Scozzari and others, judgment of 13/07/00 – Grand Chamber
Interim Resolutions ResDH(2001)65 and ResDH(2001)151, CM/Inf(2001)12 and CM/Inf(2002)20[94]
Addendum 4
The case concerns two violations of Article 8 of the Convention related, on the one hand, to the continued placement, since 1997, of the two children of the first applicant (mother) in the “Forteto” community, after they had been taken into public care and, on the other hand, to the authorities’ failure to maintain the opportunities of the mother and her children to re-establish family bonds, through the organisation of regular contact visits. The Court notably considered the fact that certain “Forteto” leaders with serious previous convictions notably for ill-treatment and sexual abuse of handicapped people placed in the community (§§32-34) could still play an active role in bringing up the children (§§201-208); the fact that the implementation of the Youth Court’s decisions had been deflected from their intended purpose of allowing visits between the mother and the children to take place as a result of the attitude of the social services (§§178-179 & 213) and of some of the leaders of “Il Forteto” (§211), who had delayed or hindered the implementation of such decisions (§209) and exercised a mounting influence on the children aimed at distancing them from their mother (§210); the doubt about who really has effective care of the children (§211); the insufficient level of control on the social services and the “Forteto” (§§179-181 & §§212-216); the risk of long-term integration of the children into the “Forteto”, which – in the Court’s opinion - runs contrary to the objectives of a temporary placement and of the superior interest of the children (§§215-216).
Individual measures: on 12/12/2002, the Florence Court of Appeal decided that the issue of the temporary placement of the children in the “Forteto” community will be re-examined at the end of June 2003, in the light of a report to be presented by the social services before 05/06/2003 on developments of the relationship between the mother and her children. This re-examination should notably make it possible to assess whether the elements that had brought the European Court to find that the rights of the mother and of her children had been violated (see above) still exist and justify the transfer of the children elsewhere, as requested by the Public Prosecutor (see also, in Addendum 4, the two Interim Resolutions ResDH(2001)65 and ResDH (2001)151 as well as the letter addressed to the Italian authorities on 08/07/2002). Furthermore, the applicant sent to Secretariat a videotape from the monthly meeting in September 2002 in which the children indicate inter alia that, contrary to the Youth Court orders of July 2001, they are still sleeping separately, each of them sharing his bedroom with a “foster parent”. According to the children, there is no traditional “family” within the community, as marriages are organised only with a view to having the right to obtain the placement of children in the “family”.
As regards the contacts between the mother and the children, the Youth Court found, in December 2000, that the social services were still continuing to delay and hamper the implementation of its decisions to organise such visits. Therefore, after three short visits in March-April 2001 (interrupted when Ms Scozzari moved to Belgium), on 17/07/2001 the Youth Court decided that a regular programme of visits should be set up, with the participation of an official of the social services, appointed among those having never previously intervened in the procedure. Following this decision, monthly visits have been taking place since December 2001, also thanks to the Belgian authorities’ undertaking to pay the travel expenses for Ms Scozzari and a qualified assistant. The question has been raised – both in the course of the discussions within the Committee of ministers and before the domestic courts – (see CM/Inf(2002)20) of whether such visits are organised in such a way to effectively allow a resumption of family relations, in conformity with the Youth Court’s decision and the Strasbourg Court’s judgment. By decision of 12/12/2002, the Florence Court of Appeal decided therefore that there should henceforth be three visits per month.
Sub-section 4.3
General measures: The judgment of the European Court was translated and published in the legal review Rivista Internazionale dei Diritti dell’Uomo, No. 3/2000, p. 1015-1046.
With respect to awareness-raising measures, in May 2001, the Superior Judicial Council asked for the organisation of seminars, both at national and local level, to train magistrates of Youth Courts on the requirements of the Convention, as interpreted in the Strasbourg case-law in the field of family law. This project has not been followed up yet. Further measures aimed at raising the awareness of the social services of the same issues are being considered.
As regards the existence of an effective and regular supervision mechanism of the placement of children, in October 2002, the Italian Delegation informed the Secretariat of the adoption of a new law (No. 149/01) in 2001, amending and making more precise certain provisions on adoption and placement of children, including as regards controls. According to the Italian delegation this law introduces regular control also over institutions such as the “Forteto”. A draft law (No. 2517/C) aiming at centralising jurisdiction over issues concerning minors has also been under examination by Parliament since April 2002.
As regards the effectiveness of existing controls and the alleged links existing between the authorities in charge of children’s placement and the “Forteto” community, in June 2002 the Superior Judicial Council decided that the involvement in the co-operative community « Il Forteto » of two members of the Youth Court did not raise any incompatibility issue, as long as these persons had not taken part in the decisions concerning the placement of the applicant’s children in the « Forteto ».
As regards the question raised of how it happened that people convicted of sexual abuse and ill-treatment were still managing a community entrusted with the care of children, the Italian Delegation explained that these people had been granted a stay of execution; in any event, any ban would no longer be applicable, as the convictions occurred a long time ago. The Secretariat has inquired how situations such as this can be prevented in the future (see for details CM/Inf(2001)12, CM/Del/Act(2001)741).
- 2174 cases concerning the length of judicial proceedings
(see also, for more detailed information, CM/Inf(98)29, CM/Inf(98)40, CM/Inf(99)37,
CM/Inf(2000)40, CM/Inf(2000)40-Add, CM/Inf(2001)37 and CM/Inf(2002)47
and Addendum and Addendum 2 ; Interim Resolutions DH(97)336, DH(99)436, DH(99)437
and ResDH(2000)135)[95]
Addendum 4, Appendix to this draft Annotated Agenda and Order of Business
In all the 2174 cases against Italy listed in the Appendix to the present document, violations of Article 6§1 were found on account of the excessive length of civil proceedings (1565 cases), execution proceedings (7 cases), labour proceedings (363 cases), administrative proceedings (117 cases), criminal proceedings (118 cases) and criminal proceedings combined with proceedings for damages (4 cases). 182 similar cases concluded by friendly settlements have been examined by the Committee of Ministers up to now (including 20 concerning civil proceedings, 126 labour proceedings, 6 administrative proceedings and 30 criminal proceedings).
General measures: Following the numerous and continuous findings of violations of the right to a trial within a reasonable time, comprehensive reforms of the Italian judicial system have been under way since the end of the eighties and notably since the Committee of Ministers found, in 1997 (cf. Interim Resolution DH(97)336), that the previously enacted measures had been ineffective. These measures however have not so far solved the problem of the excessive length of judicial proceedings in Italy.
The new general measures required and under way in the fields of civil and administrative justice were presented in Interim Resolutions DH(99)436 and DH(99)437. Subsequently, the examination was also extended to criminal justice.
A first assessment was made in October 2000 and was presented in Interim Resolution ResDH(2000)135. In this resolution, the Committee of Ministers, considering the size of the problem, decided among other things “to resume its consideration of the progress made, at least at yearly intervals, on the basis of a comprehensive report to be presented each year by the Italian authorities”.
Sub-section 4.3
The first annual report, provided by the Italian authorities (covering mainly the year 2000 and up to 2001 for criminal proceedings, issued as public document CM/Inf(2001)37), was examined by the Committee at its 764th, 775th and 803rd meetings (October 2001, February and July 2002).
The Committee concluded that the data was relatively encouraging as regards the overall reform of civil and administrative proceedings. With respect to criminal proceedings, the Committee took note of the entry into force of some important legislative reforms and other draft reforms, but regretted that the statistics available did not show any significant progress in the efficiency of criminal justice. Finally, it requested details on some other questions (see the press releases issued after the above-mentioned meetings and reproduced in CM/Inf(2002)47-Add and Addendum 2).
In December 2002, the Committee of Ministers held a preliminary examination of the second annual report provided by the Italian authorities, including statistical data on civil and criminal justice up to the end of 2001. It decided to resume consideration of the application of the measures in February 2003. Complementary information is in particular awaited about some issues detailed in a letter sent to the Italian authorities by the Director of Human Rights (see Addendum 4). New statistical data on civil and criminal justice in 2001 was sent on 19/12/02. More recent data concerning the year beginning 01/07/2001 was subsequently published in Italy on the occasion opening of the judicial year in January 2003.
This information confirms that the progress observed at the previous examination is slowing down:
- Concerning civil jurisdictions, the backlog has been reduced by 8% before courts of first instance, but is increasing before both justices of peace (+10%) and courts of appeal (between +26,5% and +30,5%). Thus the number of pending civil cases has remained stable overall at first-instance level since 1996 (about 3 300 000 cases) and at appeal level (244 000 cases) in comparison with 2001. The evolution concerning duration is difficult to evaluate because the data available is conflicting.
- Concerning the criminal jurisdictions, the backlog has increased by 3,8% (from 5 500 000 to more than 5 700 000 cases) and the average overall length of proceedings – from the preliminary inquiry to the appeal – has increased from 1490 to 1509 days.
- The situation before the Court of cassation has been worsening, the average length increased from 836 to 994 days for civil proceedings and from 192 to 219 days for criminal proceedings. Its backlog has also increased by 23% for civil proceedings and 4% for criminal proceedings.
- In view of the present results, it appears unlikely that the Sezioni stralcio could complete the 238 793 cases pending for more than 7 years on 30/06/02 (between 1/06/02 and 30/06/02, they had completed 108 970 cases) before the time-limit expected by the Committee of Ministers, i.e. November 2003.
The Committee of Ministers is awaiting information on the situation of administrative justice since 2000.
On the state of legislative reform, the report mentions some 290 new measures envisaged, including notably those relating to the reform of the criminal code and of the codes of criminal and civil procedure. In this connection, the Secretariat asked for information concerning the integration of the new measures in the overall reform project aimed at reducing the length of proceedings and also information concerning the expected impact of these measures.
Concerning judicial organisation and resources, progress appears to have been made in the computerisation of courts, although the programme is at present held up, not least for lack of funding. It will be interesting to know the progress achieved in recruiting 1000 new judges and the time-frame for their effectively taking up their duties.
Progress appears to have been made in the adoption of awareness-raising measures of the Italian judicial operators. In addition, the opinion of the Supreme Judicial Council is expected on the proposal to extend to all Italian courts the measures, concerning the internal organisation of the judicial work, successfully tested in Turin and aimed at speeding up the management of the oldest cases (“Strasbourg programme”).
Sub-section 4.3
As regards national remedies, the Italian authorities indicated that they were planning to modify the “Pinto Act”, which allows victims of excessive length of proceedings the possibility to obtain not only compensation before domestic courts, but also the acceleration of pending proceedings.
Moreover, in a judgment of June 2002 concerning the application of this law, the Italian Court of cassation concluded that the reasonable length of proceedings is not a fundamental, personal right guaranteed by the Italian Constitution.
(See also, for detailed information on the measures enacted or planned by the Italian authorities, Memorandum CM/Inf(98)29 of 28 August 1998, CM/Inf(98)40 of 27 October 1998, CM/Inf(99)37 of 6/07/1999, Memorandum CM/Inf(2000)40 and CM/Inf(2000)40-Add as well as Addendum 4 to this Annotated Agenda and order of business, the second Italian annual report CM/Inf(2002)47 and the Secretariat addendum (CM/Inf(2002)47-Add and Addendum 2).
Individual measures: the Italian authorities have been invited to provide information on the cases indicated as still pending at domestic level at the time the violation was found by the European Court of Human Rights, and to adopt appropriate measures in order to speed up these proceedings. According to the information provided, only around a third of the proceedings examined by the Committee of Ministers would still be pending before the domestic courts today, while roughly half of them were pending when the violation of the Convention was found. In addition, the pending cases having led to a conviction by the Court are now brought to the attention of the competent domestic courts and receive, where possible, accelerated treatment.
- 4 cases against Turkey
H46-2523 25781 Cyprus against Turkey, judgment of 10/05/01 – Grand Chamber
The case relates to the situation that has existed in northern Cyprus since the conduct of military operations there by Turkey in July and August 1974 and the continuing division of the territory of Cyprus. The European Court of Human Rights held that the matters complained of by Cyprus in its application entailed Turkey’s responsibility under the European Convention on Human Rights.
The Court held that there had been the following 14 violations of the Convention:
Greek-Cypriot missing persons and their relatives
- a continuing violation of Article 2 (right to life) of the Convention concerning the failure of the authorities of the respondent State to conduct an effective investigation into the whereabouts and fate of Greek-Cypriot missing persons who disappeared in life-threatening circumstances;
- a continuing violation of Article 5 (right to liberty and security) concerning the failure of the Turkish authorities to conduct an effective investigation into the whereabouts and fate of the Greek-Cypriot missing persons in respect of whom there was an arguable claim that they were in Turkish custody at the time of their disappearance;
- a continuing violation of Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment) in that the silence of the Turkish authorities in the face of the real concerns of the relatives attained a level of severity which could only be categorised as inhuman treatment.
Home and property of displaced persons
- a continuing violation of Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life, home and correspondence) concerning the refusal to allow the return of any Greek-Cypriot displaced persons to their homes in northern Cyprus;
- a continuing violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property) concerning the fact that Greek-Cypriot owners of property in northern Cyprus were being denied access to and control, use and enjoyment of their property as well as any compensation for the interference with their property rights;
- a violation of Article 13 (right to an effective remedy) concerning the failure to provide to Greek Cypriots not residing in northern Cyprus any remedies to contest interferences with their rights under Article 8 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.
Sub-section 4.3
Living conditions of Greek Cypriots in Karpas region of northern Cyprus
- a violation of Article 9 (freedom of thought, conscience and religion) in respect of Greek Cypriots living in northern Cyprus, concerning the effects of restrictions on freedom of movement which limited access to places of worship and participation in other aspects of religious life;
- a violation of Article 10 (freedom of expression) in respect of Greek Cypriots living in northern Cyprus in so far as school-books destined for use in their primary school were subject to excessive measures of censorship;
- a continuing violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 in respect of Greek Cypriots living in northern Cyprus in that their right to the peaceful enjoyment of their possessions was not secured in case of their permanent departure from that territory and in that, in case of death, inheritance rights of relatives living in southern Cyprus were not recognized;
- a violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 (right to education) in respect of Greek Cypriots living in northern Cyprus in so far as no appropriate secondary-school facilities were available to them;
- a violation of Article 3 in that the Greek Cypriots living in the Karpas area of northern Cyprus had been subjected to discrimination amounting to degrading treatment;
- a violation of Article 8 concerning the right of Greek Cypriots living in northern Cyprus to respect for their private and family life and to respect for their home;
- a violation of Article 13 by reason of the absence of remedies in respect of interferences by the authorities, as a matter of practice, with the rights of Greek Cypriots living in northern Cyprus under Articles 3, 8, 9 and 10 of the Convention and Articles 1 and 2 of Protocol No. 1.
Rights of Turkish Cypriots living in northern Cyprus
- a violation of Article 6 (right to a fair trial) on account of the legislative practice of authorizing the trial of civilians by military courts.
The Court also decided, unanimously, that the question of the possible application of Article 41 (just satisfaction) of the Convention was not ready for decision and adjourned consideration thereof.
The Deputies examined this case for the first time at their 760th meeting (July 2001) (see the records of the 760th meeting).
During the second examination of the case at the 764th meeting (October 2001) delegations strongly supported the proposal made by the Delegation of Liechtenstein that the Committee should follow the approach already proposed by the Director General of human rights at the 760th meeting, that is identifying specific categories of violations according to the complexity of the execution measures required:
- the question of missing persons,
- the living conditions of Greek Cypriots in northern Cyprus,
- the rights of Turkish Cypriots living in northern Cyprus,
- the question of the homes and property of displaced persons.
The Liechtenstein Delegation proposed that Delegations concentrate on some of the violations presented under the heading “Living conditions of Greek Cypriots in northern Cyprus” specifically in the Karpas region, as well as the problem of the powers of the military courts presented under heading “Rights of Turkish Cypriots living in northern Cyprus”. As indicated by the Chairman in his summing-up, the procedure adopted for the examination of this case should not prevent the Deputies from pursuing in parallel an examination of the other issues raised in the Court’s Judgment.
At the 783rd meeting (February 2002), the Delegation of Turkey stated that it was in agreement with the approach suggested at the 764th meeting.
At the 792nd meeting, it was noted that a large number of Delegations consider that the question of missing persons should be examined as a matter of priority. At the same meeting the Delegation of Turkey gave a certain amount of information which has been distributed at its request, to all Delegations. The Delegation of Turkey notably indicated that the legislative practice of authorising the trial of civilians by military courts no longer took place: judges who sit on courts which try civilians are chosen from civilian judges by an independent body whose members themselves are civilians.
Sub-section 4.3
At the 798th meeting, the discussions focused in particular on the situation of missing persons and the role played by the Committee on Missing Persons in Cyprus (CMP). Whilst the Turkish Delegation underlined the importance of the CMP, the contribution of Turkey to the work of the CMP and the necessity of reactivating it, several other delegations referred to the text of the Court’s judgment. In fact, in its judgment, the Court considers “that the respondent State’s procedural obligation at issue cannot be discharged through its contribution to the investigatory work of the CMP … (and) it notes that, although the CMP’s procedures are undoubtedly useful for the humanitarian purpose for which they were established, they are not of themselves sufficient to meet the standard of an effective investigation required by Article 2 of the Convention, especially in view of the narrow scope of that body’s investigations”.
At the 810th meeting (October 2002) the Greek Delegation asked that special attention be given to the “living conditions of Greek Cypriots in northern Cyprus” at the 819th meeting.
At the 819th meeting (December 2002), the Committee decided to postpone the examination of the case to the present meeting.
H54-763 15318 Loizidou, judgments of 18/12/96 (merits) and 28/07/98 (just satisfaction) – Interim Resolutions DH(99)680, DH(2000)105 and ResDH(2001)80[96]
Addendum 4
At the present stage of the examination of the case the Deputies have decided to concentrate on the question of payment of the just satisfaction awarded in the last-mentioned judgment on account of the violation of the applicant’s right to the peaceful enjoyment of certain properties located in the Northern part of Cyprus (violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1). The Court specified that payment was to take place within 3 months, i.e. before 28/10/1998.
Just satisfaction: As Turkey did not pay the just satisfaction awarded, the Chairman of the Committee of Ministers, the Icelandic Minister of Foreign Affairs, on 22/06/1999 wrote to his Turkish counterpart expressing the Committee’s concern regarding the failure to execute the judgment.
Payment still not taking place, the Committee adopted, on 06/10/1999, Interim Resolution DH(99)680, strongly urging Turkey to review its position and to pay the just satisfaction awarded. As payment still remained outstanding, the Chairman of the Committee, the Irish Minister of Foreign Affairs, wrote a new letter on 04/04/2000 to his Turkish counterpart reiterating the Committee’s expectation that Turkey ensure payment in the near future. The reply of the Turkish Ministers of Foreign Affairs indicated that Turkey did not consider itself to have either the competence or the jurisdiction to execute the Court’s judgment.
On 12/07/2000, the Deputies, in response, adopted a new Interim Resolution DH(2000)105, declaring that the refusal of Turkey to execute the judgment of the Court demonstrates a manifest disregard for its international obligations, both as a High Contracting Party to the Convention and as a member State of the Council of Europe and insisted strongly, in view of the gravity of the matter, that Turkey comply fully and without any further delay with the European Court of Human Rights’ judgment of 28/07/1998.
At the 749th meeting (April 2001) the Turkish Delegation presented a payment proposal subjected, however, to conditions deemed unacceptable by the other Delegations.
Payment not taking place the Committee adopted on 26/06/2001 a new Interim Resolution ResDH(2001)80 in which it recalled its previous Interim Resolutions and stated:
“Very deeply deploring the fact that, to date, Turkey has still not complied with its obligations under this judgment;
Stressing that every member State of the Council of Europe must accept the principles of the rule of law and of the enjoyment by all persons within its jurisdiction of human rights and fundamental freedoms;
Stressing that acceptance of the Convention, including the compulsory jurisdiction of the Court and the binding nature of its judgments, has become a requirement for membership of the organisation;
Sub-section 4.3
Stressing that the Convention is a system for the collective enforcement of the rights protected therein,
Declares the Committee’s resolve to ensure, with all means available to the organization, Turkey’s compliance with its obligations under this judgment,
Calls upon the authorities of the member States to take such action as they deem appropriate to this end.”
When the Deputies examined the matter at their 783rd meeting (February 2002), the Turkish Delegation reiterated the proposal made at the 749th meeting. Recalling that the conditions attaching to this proposal were unacceptable, several delegations presented proposals in order to make possible progress on the payment question.
The Deputies at the 792nd meeting (April 2002), different proposals regarding payment of the sums awarded were discussed. The proposals examined were mainly based on the idea of a payment to the Council of Europe, which organisation should forward the sums, including default interest, to the applicant. The Delegations of Greece and Cyprus objected to such a payment method as it would not correspond to the Court’s judgment, which ordered payment to the applicant. Several Delegations asked Turkey to provide further clarifications as to the exact content of its own payment proposal.
The Chairman also presented to the Deputies a letter from the applicant in which she expressed her frustration and anguish about Turkey’s unwillingness to comply with the judgment and asked to be authorised to address the Committee in person at a forthcoming meeting. A short discussion followed indicating that the Deputies were not inclined to grant the request. A negative reply has subsequently been sent by the Chair to the applicant.
For procedural reasons, the merits of the case could not be examined at the 796th meeting (May 2002) and the examination was postponed to the 798th DH meeting (June 2002). The Chairman indicated that he would in the meantime continue his consultations with interested Delegations. At the 798th (June 2002) and 803rd (July 2002), 810th (October 2002) and 819th (December 2002) meetings no new information regarding the payment was available.
The texts of the Interim Resolutions adopted in this case appear in Addendum 4.
H46-2524 26308 Institut de Prêtres français and others, judgment of 14/12/00 – Friendly settlement
Addendum 4
The case concerns a Turkish judicial decision of 1993 annulling the applicant Institute’s property entitlement to a plot of land on the grounds that, by letting part of this land to a private company, the applicant Institute was no longer eligible for special treatment as a non-profit body (complaints under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 and Article 9). The parties concluded a friendly settlement according to which the Government undertook the following obligations:
- The Treasury and the Directorate General of Foundations recognise the right to usufruct to the benefit of the priests representing the applicant Institute. This right to usufruct shall comprise the full use and enjoyment of the land and the buildings thereon and the right to rent the land for profit-making purposes in order to meet its needs;
- The two above-mentioned state authorities agree to undertake the formalities necessary to register their respective declarations in the land register with a view to renewing the life tenancy in favour of the priests who will replace the current usufructuary;
- The Directorate General of Foundations waives its claim to USD 41,670 owed by the applicant Institute in rent collected over the five years since its property title was annulled.
In October 2001, the applicant Institute indicated to the Secretariat that the Government had still not complied with the terms of the friendly settlement. The applicant thus requested that the appropriate action be taken without further delay by the authorities and that in particular:
- the Government should give instruction for registering in the land register the right to usufruct to the benefit of the current representative of the Church, Father Alain Fontaine;
- the Government should ensure that the General Directorate of Foundations immediately ceases the collection of the rents and recognises the applicant’s right to usufruct;
- the Treasury should withdraw its claim for compensation for illegal occupation of the plot.
Sub-section 4.3
The necessity of an urgent solution to these issues has been stressed in the Committee of Ministers at each of its DH meetings since October 2001 and the Turkish authorities have been invited to take the necessary measures without further delay. In 2002, the Turkish Delegation indicated on numerous occasions that the above-mentioned problems were going to be solved, notably through a Decree by the Prime Minister and that the competent national authorities were engaged in negotiations with the applicant Institute in order to establish the division of rent between the State and the applicants. However, no conclusive result has been achieved.
In view of these persistent problems, it was decided at the 810th meeting (October 2002) that the Chairman-in-office of the Committee of Ministers write a letter to her Turkish counterpart with a view to conveying to him the Committee’s concern at the non-execution of the friendly settlement concluded in this case and to requesting a rapid solution to the problem. This letter was sent on 06/11/2002. By letter of 29/11/2002, the Minister of Foreign Affairs conveyed the Committee's concerns to the Prime Minister asking him to instruct the competent authorities urgently to implement the friendly settlement (see Addendum 4).
During the examination of the case at the 819th meeting (December, 2002), the adoption of an Interim Resolution was suggested if no concrete and visible progress were achieved by February 2003. At the time of issuing the present annotated Agenda, i.e. more than 2 years after the Court's judgment, no new information regarding its execution was available.
H46-2525 29900+ Sadak, Zana, Dicle and Doğan, judgment of 17/07/01
Addendum 4
The case concerns the violation of the right to a fair trial in proceedings before the Ankara State Security Court, which sentenced the four applicants, members of the Turkish Grand National Assembly, to 15 years’ imprisonment in December 1994.
The violations found are the following:
- lack of independence and impartiality of the tribunal due to the presence of a military judge on the bench of the State Security Court (violation of Article 6§1 - see §40 of the judgment);
- lack of timely information about the legal redefinition of the accusation brought against the applicants and lack of sufficient time and facilities to prepare the applicants’ defence (violation of Article 6§3 a and b taken together with Article 6§1 - see §§57-59 of the judgment);
- impossibility to examine or to have examined the witnesses who testified against the applicants (violation of Article 6§3d taken together with Article 6§1 - see §§67-68 of the judgment).
Having found these violations, the Court did not consider it necessary to decide separately the applicants’ complaints under Articles 10, 11 and 14.
Individual measures:
Background: In view of the extent of the violations of the right to a fair trial and of their consequences for the applicants, the Turkish authorities were requested, at the 764th meeting (October 2001), to consider urgently specific individual measures to erase these consequences. (cf. Committee of Ministers’ Recommendation R(2000)2 and its Interim Resolution ResDH(2001)106 on the individual measures in cases concerning freedom of expression in Turkey).
The Turkish authorities initially informed the Committee (at the 775th meeting, December 2001) that possibilities for re-opening domestic proceedings following the European Court’s judgments would be shortly introduced through legislation. However, at the 783rd meeting (February 2002), the Turkish Delegation indicated that preparation of the draft law in question had been adjourned but that the Turkish authorities were continuing to seek ways to adopt the necessary individual measures in the present case. Many delegations expressed their disappointment at the fact that the new legislation, which was of such urgency for the execution of the present judgment, had been adjourned and deplored the fact that no specific measure had yet been taken in respect of the applicants. Some delegations furthermore stressed that the execution of the judgment was being attentively observed by the Parliamentary Assembly (cf. AS(2002)CR2) and outside the Council of Europe, notably by the European Union.
Sub-section 4.3
Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)59: At the 794th meeting (30 April 2002), as no progress in the execution of the judgment was reported on this point, the Committee of Ministers adopted Interim Resolution in which it
- Strongly urges the Turkish authorities, without further delay, to respond to the Committee’s repeated demands that the said authorities urgently remedy the applicants’ situation and take the necessary measures in order to reopen the proceedings impugned by the Court in this case, or other ad hoc measures erasing the consequences for the applicants of the violations found;
-Decides, in view of the urgency of the situation, to resume its control of the adoption of these individual measures, if necessary at each of its meetings.
At the 798th (June 2002) and 803rd (July 2002) meetings, the Turkish delegation stated that the authorities were still considering the introduction of a possibility for reopening of proceedings through legislation.
At the 807th meting (September 2002), the Representative of Turkey presented the reforms adopted by the Parliament on 03/08/2002 and the Deputies specifically considered the amendments to the Codes of Criminal and Civil Procedure, which concern the reopening of domestic proceedings. Disappointment was expressed at the fact that that the four applicants in the present case – who continue to serve their 15-year prison sentences and to suffer the consequences of the violations found – will not be able to benefit from the newly adopted provisions (the latter were applicable only to new cases lodged with the European Court after their entry into force, i.e. after 03/08/2003). The necessity for urgent action to grant the applicants the appropriate redress has been accordingly strongly reiterated.
As no concrete action in this respect had been reported at the 810th meeting (October 2002), the Secretariat was mandated to prepare a new draft Interim Resolution.
Adoption of new legislation: At the 819th meeting (December, 2002) the Turkish authorities announced that the draft provisions which would allow the reopening of proceedings in the present case had been included in the complementary reform package presented to the Prime Minister. The question of adoption of a new Interim Resolution was thus not pursued by the Committee. Instead, it welcomed the new information and "expressed confidence that Turkey would ensure that the new legislation is adopted rapidly, and immediately applied to the applicants’ case in the light of the gravity of their situation".
On 23/01/2003, the Grand National Assembly adopted the provisions allowing the re-opening of domestic proceedings in all cases which have already been decided by the European Court and in all new cases which would henceforth be brought before the European Court (see Addendum 4). The provisions however exclude re-opening for all cases which are presently pending before the Court and have not yet been decided. The Law still has to be approved by the President.
On 27/01/2003, the Turkish Prime-Minister Abdullah Gül confirmed before the Parliamentary Assembly that, in accordance with this law, a new trial could now be granted to the four applicants. Information on the re-opening of the case before domestic courts is awaited.
Follow-up by the Parliamentary Assembly: From the outset, the Parliamentary Assembly has been closely scrutinising the follow-up to the present judgment. At its 4th part session (23/09/2002) the Assembly held a debate and adopted Resolution 1297(2002) and Recommendation 1576(2002) on the implementation of the Court's judgments by Turkey. In these texts the Assembly, in particular, strongly supported demands to remedy the applicants' situation and urged the Committee of Ministers to use all means at its disposal to ensure compliance with the judgment without further delay.
General measures:
Information has been requested with regard to the measures the Turkish authorities envisage with a view to preventing new violations of the right to a fair trial in the proceedings before the security courts. The Turkish authorities have informed the Committee that some reforms had already been adopted and certain others were under way.
As regards the specific problem relating to the lack of independence and impartiality of the State Security courts, general measures have already been adopted within the constitutional reform which replaced the military judge on State Security Courts by a civil judge (see the Çiraklar against Turkey case, judgment of 28/10/1998, Resolution DH(99)555). As regards the right to a fair trial in general, this right received constitutional protection as a result of an amendment to Article 36 of the Constitution on 17/10/2001.
SECTION 5 - SUPERVISION OF GENERAL MEASURES ALREADY ANNOUNCED
(See Addendum 5 for part or all these cases)
Action
The Deputies are invited to supervise progress in the adoption of general measures aiming at preventing further similar violations to those found by the Court in the following cases. If necessary, supplementary information on some or all the cases listed below will appear in Addendum 5. The Deputies are invited to resume consideration of these cases in 6 months at the latest.
SUB-SECTION 5.1 – LEGISLATIVE AND/OR REGULATORY CHANGES
- 4 cases against Belgium
H46-2526 34989 Goedhart, judgment of 20/03/01, final on 20/06/01
H46-2527 36449+ Stroek L. and C., judgment of 20/03/01, final on 20/06/01
H46-2529 26103 Van Geyseghem, judgment of 21/01/99 – Grand Chamber
These three cases concern infringements of the applicants’ right to defend themselves through legal assistance of their own choosing at different stages of criminal proceedings (1st instance, appeal and “opposition”(appeal on specific grounds of non-representation)) the Courts seised having refused, because of the applicants’ failure to appear, to hear their lawyers or to take into account the pleadings filed by them on the merits (violations of Article 6§1 combined with Article 6§3c)).
The cases of Stroek and Godhaert also concern an infringement of the right of access to a tribunal because of the decisions of the Cour de cassation declaring the applicants’ appeal on points of law inadmissible because they had not complied with warrants for their arrest (violation of Article 6§1).
Possible individual measures: The authorities granted a pardon to Mr Stroek and Mr Goedhart which erased the consequences of their conviction, i.e. declared void the international arrest warrant taken out against them. Following the 798th meeting (June 2002) the Belgian authorities sent the Secretariat a draft law, which had been adopted by the Belgian House of Representatives on 16/05/02, inserting a new Article 442bis in the Code of Criminal Investigation. Information is awaited on this subject.
During the examination of these cases, the Representative of Belgium also indicated that a Bill on reopening of proceedings following a judgement of the European Court of Human Rights was being studied.
General measures: the European Court’s judgment has been widely disseminated with a circular and the Cour de cassation quickly changed its case-law. A Bill modifying the Code of Criminal Procedure was transmitted for opinion to the Conseil d’Etat on 14/09/2001. Information is awaited on this subject.
H54-2528 25357 Aerts, judgment of 30/07/98
The case concerns the lawfulness and the conditions of the applicant’s detention in the psychiatric wing of an ordinary prison for seven months pending his transfer to a social protection centre, the applicant’s right of access to a tribunal with the power to determine the lawfulness of that detention and his right to legal aid (violations of Article 5§1e) and Article 6§1).
General measures: the Belgian authorities indicated that ad hoc measures had been taken in order to increase the number of places available in social protection centres, thus reducing delays in transferring prisoners to about 2 months. Moreover, the judgment was published in several legal journals. Further information has been requested concerning measures envisaged to prevent new violations as regards the granting of legal aid and access to the Cour de cassation. In this connection, at the 732nd meeting (December 2000), the Representative of Belgium indicated that a draft law was being prepared and would be transmitted to the Secretariat. At the 775th and 798th meetings (December 2001 and June 2002), the Representative of Belgium stated that the draft law was being examined by the State Council. The attention of the Belgian authorities has been drawn to the recent case-law of the European Court, providing further indications on the requirements of the Convention as regards the granting of legal aid in cassation proceedings (cf. judgments Del Sol and Essaadi against France of 26/02/2002)
- 1 case against Latvia
H46-899 46726 Podkolzina, judgment of 09/04/02, final on 09/07/02
The case relates to a violation of the right of the applicant, a Latvian national belonging to a Russian-speaking minority, to present her candidature at the elections to the Parliament in October 1998, in that she was struck off the electoral lists on the ground of insufficient knowledge of the Latvian language. The European Court took the view that, in subjecting the applicant to an additional language test with a fundamentally different procedure from normal, the administrative and judicial authorities had effectively imposed upon her a procedure which did not comply with the conditions of fairness and legal certainty. It also considered that the Riga Regional Court had deliberately decided not to put right the violation committed, as it had chosen to regard the results of the second test, held according to a procedure presenting no basic guarantees of fairness, as irrefutable (violation of Article 3 of Protocol No. 1).
Sub-section 5.1
General measures: At the 810th meeting, the Representative of Latvia stated inter alia that following the European Court's judgment, the Laws on parliamentary and municipal elections were amended on 09/05/2002. As a result, the provisions requiring higher proficiency in Latvian language for all persons running for parliamentary election were deleted. The judgment of the European Court was furthermore published in the Official Gazette of 21/05/2002. The Latvian authorities' attention was drawn in particular to § 37 of the judgment which highlights the refusal by the Riga Regional Court to review the lawfulness of decisions taken by administrative authorities. The Latvian authorities were thus invited to consider measures to prevent similar problems in the future. In this context, examples demonstrating the direct effect of the European Court's judgments in domestic court case-law have been requested.
- 20 cases against Poland
H46-901 29692+ R.D., judgment of 18/12/01, final on 18/03/02
The case relates to a refusal by the Wrocław Court of Appeal to grant the applicant free legal assistance for cassation proceedings which prevented him from having his case brought to and defended in the Court of cassation (violation of Article 6§1 taken together with Article 6§3c).
General measures: At the 798th meeting (June 2002), the Representative of Poland stated that the Ministry of Justice was drawing up new legislation which would allow individuals easier access to the legal aid. He added that the judgment of the European Court had been translated and sent to the Ministry of Justice for publication and dissemination to domestic courts. The Polish authorities were invited to provide the text of current legislation governing legal aid and a copy of the new draft provisions once they are finalised. They were also requested to provide new examples of domestic case-law showing that the latter effectively takes into account the European Court's judgments.
H46-2530 27785 Włoch, judgment of 19/10/00, final on 22/01/01
H46-606 24244 Migoń, judgment of 25/06/2002, final on 25/09/2002[97]
These cases concern the unfairness of judicial proceedings brought between 1993 and 1995 by the applicants, persons detained on remand at that time, in order to regain their freedom. This was due to the facts that the applicants' lawyers could not participate at all the judicial hearings and that they could not have access to the case-files at certain stages of the proceedings (violations of Article 5§4).
General measures: At the 749th meeting (April 2001), the Representative of Poland indicated that, subsequent to the impugned facts, the relevant provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure had been modified so as to prevent new similar violations of the Convention and that the Ministry of Justice was preparing a circular to courts with a view to drawing their attention to the Włoch judgment and to the rules currently in force. He stated that copies of this circular and of the new legal provisions would be sent to the Secretariat. The Polish Delegation confirmed this information at the 798th (June 2002) and 819th (September 2002) meetings. However, none of the above-mentioned texts have so far been received at the Secretariat.
Sub-section 5.1
- Cases of length of civil proceedings[98]
H54-2531 27916 Podbielski, judgment of 30/10/98
H54-2532 28616 Styranowski, judgment of 30/10/98
H46-757 38328 Bejer, judgment of 04/10/01, final on 04/01/02[99]
H46-2533 27918 C., judgment of 03/05/01
H46-2534 48001 Goc, judgment of 16/04/02, final on 16/07/02
H46-2535 29695 Gronuś, judgment of 28/05/02, final on 28/08/02
H46-2536 29691 Jedamski, judgment of 26/07/01, final on 26/10/01
H46-2537 43779 Mączyński, judgment of 15/01/02, final on 15/04/02
H46-2538 35843 Malinowska, judgment of 14/12/00, final on 14/03/01
H46-2539 36250 Parciński, judgment of 18/03/01, final on 18/03/02
H46-2540 29455 Pogorzelec, judgment of 17/07/01, final on 12/12/01
H46-2541 25693+ Sobczyk, judgment of 26/10/00, final on 26/01/01
H46-2542 40835 Szaparo, judgment of 23/05/02, final on 23/08/02
H46-608 48684 Uthke, judgment of 18/06/02, défintif le 18/09/02[100]
H46-2543 32734 Wasilewski, judgment of 21/12/00, final on 06/09/01
H46-2544 33082 Wojnowicz, judgment of 21/09/00, final on 22/01/01
H46-2545 34158 Zawadzki, judgment of 20/12/01, final on 27/03/02
SUB-SECTION 5.2 – CHANGES OF COURTS’ CASE-LAW OR OF ADMINISTRATIVE PRACTICE
No new case
SUB-SECTION 5.3 – PUBLICATION / DISSEMINATION
- 2 cases against France
H46-2546 46044 Lallement, judgment of 11/04/2002, final on 11/07/2002
The case concerns the fact that the applicant was deprived of his property as a result of an expropriation carried out in the public interest. The European Court took the view first that, given the specific nature of the applicant’s situation (in particular the scattered nature of his land and his agricultural specialisation) the compensation awarded was not proportionate to the value of the property expropriated since it did not specifically cover the loss of the applicant’s “working tool” and secondly that the relevant articles of the Code on expropriation proposed no effective remedy to the situation called into question (violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1).
Just satisfaction: The European Court decided that Article 41 concerning pecuniary damage in respect of the loss of the applicants’ source of income is not ready for decision.
General measures: Written confirmation that the judgment of the European Court has been published is awaited.
H46-2547 36677 SA Dangeville, judgment of 16/04/2002, final on 16/07/2002
The case concerns an infringement of the applicant company’s right to the peaceful enjoyment of its possessions. The company brought an action requesting the refund of the VAT which it had paid in respect of the financial year 1978 relying a European Community Directive which entered into force on 01/01/78 which exonerated various business activities, including those carried out by the applicant company, from payment of the tax. This claim was dismissed not least on the ground that a directive could not be relied upon by an individual litigant against a provision of national law. The applicant lodged a second application, which was dismissed by a further judgment of the Conseil d’Etat, holding that the applicant could not seek to obtain, by way of an action for damages, satisfaction which had been refused in the tax proceedings in a decision which had become res judicata. The European Court of Human Rights noted that in both its applications the applicant was a creditor of the state on account of the VAT wrongly paid for 1978 and that in any event it had at least a legitimate expectation of being able to obtain a refund. The European Court found that the interference with the applicant company’s possessions did not satisfy the requirements of the general interest and that this interference was disproportionate because of its inability to enforce its debt against the State and the lack of domestic proceedings providing a sufficient remedy to protect its right to respect for enjoyment of its possessions, upset the fair balance between the demands of the general interest of the community and the requirements of the protection of the individual’s fundamental rights (violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1).
General measures: The written confirmation of the judgment’s publication is awaited.
- 1 case against Greece
H46-157 37095 Pialopoulos and others, judgment on 15/02/01, final on 27/06/02 and on 15/05/01, final on 06/11/2002[101] (Article 41)[102]
The case concerns an unjustified restriction of the applicants’ right to use their property, due to a series of building prohibitions imposed by the administrative authorities and attempted expropriations decided upon by these authorities without prior compensation (violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1). The case also concerns the fact that the administration failed to comply with a judgment of a court of appeal declaring revoked ipso jure one of the expropriations on the grounds that the compensation was not paid within the time-limit provided for by law (violation of Article 6§1).
In this last-mentioned respect, the case presents similarities in particular to the Hornsby case (judgment of 19/03/1997) closure of which is proposed following a number of general measures adopted by the Greek authorities.
Sub-section 5.3
Individual measures: At the 760th meeting (July 2001), the Greek authorities were asked to inform the Committee of Ministers about the measures envisaged for the official annulment of the impugned expropriation (§ 69 of the judgment of the European Court), as well as about the settlement of the present situation of the applicants’ property. Following the 803rd meeting, a copy of the revocation of the expropriation dated 7 July 2002, was transmitted to the Secretariat by the authorities.
General measures: The wide dissemination of the judgment of the European Court to the competent administrative authorities would be useful.
- 1 case against Italy
H46-2548 43269 Leoni, judgment of 26/10/00, final on 04/04/01[103]
The case concerns the dismissal of an appeal on a point of law lodged by the applicant before the Italian Court of Cassation, to obtain compensation for damage resulting from the allegedly unfounded rejection of his application to be registered by the surveyors’ professional body. The European Court of Human Rights found that the dismissal of this application for being out of time - while the applicant had in fact respected the deadline – had infringed his right to of access to a tribunal (violation of Article 6§1).
General measures: At the 757th meeting (June 2001) the Italian authorities were invited to ensure dissemination of the judgment of the European Court to the Rome Court of Appeal and the Court of Cassation.
- 1 case against Lithuania
H46-2549 48297 Butkevičius, judgment of 26/03/2002, final on 26/06/2002
The case concerns the unlawfulness of the detention on remand of the applicant, a member of Parliament and Minister of Defence at the time, in the absence of judicial orders (violation of article 5§1 for the periods from 30/11/1997 to 08/12/997 and from 31/12/1997 to 08/01/1998). It also concerns the fact that the applicant had no opportunity to contest the lawfulness of his detention on remand (violation of article 5§4) and the breach of the presumption of innocence in respect of the applicant by the statements of the President of the Parliament which prejudged the assessment of the facts by the judicial authorities (violation of Article 6§2).
General measures: Given the violation of the presumption of innocence found in this case, it was requested, at the 810th meeting (September 2002), that the judgment of the European Court be published and disseminated to Parliament and to the public prosecutor's office with an express reference to the Court's conclusions on the ground of Article 6§2.
With regard to the violations of Article 5, this case presents similarities to the case of Ječius against Lithuania (judgment of 31/07/2000), in which Lithuania has already adopted inter alia legislative amendments to prevent new, similar violations (a draft final Resolution is being prepared).
SUB-SECTION 5.4 – OTHER MEASURES
No new case
SECTION 6 - CASES AWAITING FOR THE PRESENTATION OF A DRAFT RESOLUTION
Action
At the time of issuing the present annotated Agenda and Order of Business, the Secretariat was preparing, in consultation with the Permanent Representations concerned, draft resolutions aiming at closing the examination of these cases. The Deputies are invited to postpone consideration of these cases to their next meeting.
Section 6
- 23 cases against Austtia
H46-2550 36075 Siegl, judgment of 20/06/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46-2551 29271 Dichand and others, judgment of 26/02/02, final on 26/05/02
H46-2552 34315 Krone Verlag Gmbh and Co. Kg., judgment of 26/02/02, final on 26/05/02
H46-2553 28525 Unabhängige Initiative Informationsvielfalt, judgment of 26/02/02, final on 26/05/02
H46-2554 37075 Luksch, judgment of 13/12/01, final on 13/03/02
H46-2555 27783 T., judgment of 14/11/00
H46-2556 31266 G.H., judgment of 03/10/00, final on 03/01/01
H46-2557 26297 G.S., judgment of 21/12/99
H46-2558 35019 Ludescher, judgment of 20/12/01, final on 20/03/02
H46-2559 33915 Walder, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 17/09/01
H32-2560 17291 Hortolomei
H46-2561 37950 Franz Fischer, judgment of 29/05/01, final on 29/08/01
H46-2562 26958 Jerusalem, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H54-2563 15153 Vereinigung Demokratischer Soldaten Österreichs and Berthold Gubi,
judgment of 19/12/94
H32-2564 26113 Wirtschafts-Trend Zeitschriften Verlagsgesellchaft m.b.H.
H46-2565 25878 Michael Edward Cooke, judgment of 08/02/00
H46-2566 30428 Beer Gertrude, judgment of 06/02/01
H46-2567 33382 Fischer Joseph, judgment of 17/01/02, final on 17/04/02
H46-2568 28501 Pobornikoff, judgment of 03/10/00
H46-2569 33501 Telfner, judgment of 20/03/01, final on 20/06/01
H46-2570 32381 Baischer, judgment of 20/12/01, final on 20/03/02
H46-2571 29477 Eisenstecken, judgment of 03/10/00
H46-2572 34320 Freiheitliche Landesgruppe Burgenland, judgment of 18/07/2002 – Friendly
settlement
- 2 cases against Bulgaria
H32-2573 30381 Mironov - Interim Resolution DH(99)352
H46-2574 32438 Stefanov, judgment of 03/05/01, final on 03/08/01 - Friendly settlement
- 2 cases against Cyprus
H46-2575 29515 Larkos, judgment of 18/02/99
H46-2576 47293 Selim, judgment of 16/07/2002 - Friendly settlement
- 3 cases against the Czech Republic
H46-2577 33644 Cesky, judgment of 06/06/00, final on 06/09/00
H46-2578 31315 Punzelt, judgment of 25/04/00, final on 25/07/00
H46-2579 35848 Barfuss, judgment of 31/07/00, final on 31/10/00
- 2 cases against Denmark
H46-2580 48470 Jensen, judgment of 14/02/02 – Friendly settlement
H46-2581 56811 Amrollahi, judgment of 11/07/2002, final on 11/10/2002
- 1 case against Finland
H46-2582 25651 L., judgment of 27/04/00, final on 27/07/00
Section 6
- 94 cases against France
H46-2583 38945 Francisco, judgment of 13/11/01, final on 13/02/02
H46-2584 42189 H.L., judgment of 07/02/02, final on 07/05/02
H46-2585 55672 Beaume Marty, judgment of 19/03/02, final on 19/06/02
H46-2586 46280 Benzi, judgment of 19/03/02, final on 19/06/02
H46-2587 49622 Goubert and Labbe, judgment of 19/03/02, final on 19/06/02
H46-2588 50996 Grand, judgment of 26/03/2002, final on 26/06/2002
H46-2589 44485 Moullet, judgment of 26/03/2002, final on 26/06/2002
H46-2590 41946+ Ribes J.M. and M.A., judgment of 07/05/2002, final on 07/08/2002
H46-2591 51818 Société Comabat, judgment of 26/03/2002, final on 26/06/2002
H46-2592 32872 Peltier, judgment of 21/05/2002, final on 21/08/2002
H46-2593 34791 Khalfaoui, judgment of 14/12/99, final on 14/03/00
H46-2594 31070 Van Pelt, judgment of 23/05/00, final on 23/08/00
H46-2595 29507 Slimane-Kaïd II, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 17/05/00[104]
H46-2596 31819+ Annoni Di Gussola, Desbordes and Omer, judgment of 14/11/00, final on 14/02/01
H32-2597 27659 Ferville
H32-2598 28845 Venot
H46-2599 34553 Dulaurans, judgment of 21/03/00
H32-2600 33656 Lemoine Daniel
H32-2601 17572 A.C.
H54-2602 25201 Guerin, judgment of 29/07/98
H54-2603 24767 Omar, judgment of 29/07/98
H54-2604 14032 Poitrimol, judgment of 23/11/93
H46-2605 25444 Pelissier and Sassi, judgment of 25/03/99
H46-2606 27362 Voisine, judgment of 08/02/00
H32-2607 27413 Cazes
H46-2608 25803 Selmouni, judgment of 28/07/99 - Grand Chamber
H46-2609 34406 Mazurek, judgment of 01/02/00, final on 01/05/00
H46-2610 25088 Chassagnou and others, judgment of 29/04/99
H54-2611 25017 Mehemi, judgment of 06/09/97
H32-2612 27019 Slimane-Kaïd I
H54-2613 23618 Lambert Michel, judgment of 24/08/98
H32-2614 24263 Areno
H46-2615 37786 Debboub Husseini Ali, judgment of 09/11/99, final on 09/02/00
H32-2616 23438 Elbialy
H32-2617 22578 G.N. II
H46-2618 39779+ Gombert and Gochgarian, judgment of 13/02/201, final on 13/05/01
H54-2619 28213 I.A., judgment of 23/09/98
H32-2620 18847 J-P.DV
H32-2621 15091 L.D.
H32-2622 21911 Lanza
H32-2623 17831 Morganti
H54-2624 21802 Muller, judgment of 17/03/97
H46-2625 38781 P.B., judgment of 01/08/00, final on 01/11/00
H46-2626 34947 Richet, judgment of 13/02/01, final on 13/05/01
H32-2627 24245 Touihri
H46-2628 42211 Zannouti, judgment of 31/07/01, final on 31/10/01
H46-2629 38687 Djaid, judgment of 29/09/99, final on 29/12/99
H46-2630 49342 Dunan, judgment of 30/10/01 – Friendly settlement
H46-2631 49350 Ivars, judgment of 30/10/01 – Friendly settlement
H46-2632 39066 Donnadieu, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46-2633 33933 Guisset, judgment of 26/09/00, final on 26/09/00
H32-2634 31603 Hermant
Section 6
H46-2635 35589 Kanoun, judgment of 03/10/00, final on 03/01/01
H46-2636 41943 L.L., judgment of 07/02/02, final on 07/05/02
H46-2637 47575 Marks and Ordinateur Express, judgment of 21/02/02, final on 21/05/02
H32-2638 26496 Société Fruehauf France
H46-2639 36932 Caillot, judgment of 04/06/99, final on 04/09/99
H46-2640 38249 Arvois, judgment of 23/11/99, final on 23/02/00
H46-2641 28660 Ballestra, judgment of 12/12/00, final on 12/03/01
H46-2642 33207 Blaisot C. and M., judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00
H46-2643 42401 Camps, judgment of 24/10/00, final on 09/04/01
H46-2644 54757 Chaufour, judgment of 19/03/02, final on 19/06/02
H46-2645 41449 Durrand I, judgment of 13/11/01, final on 13/02/02
H46-2646 42038 Durrand II, judgment of 13/11/01, final on 13/02/02
H46-2647 30979 Frydlender, judgment of 27/06/00
H46-2648 48205+ Gentilhomme, Schaff-Benhadji and Zerouki, judgment of 14/05/2002, final on 14/08/2002
H46-2649 44066 Grass, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01
H46-2650 41001 Joseph-Gilbert Garcia, judgment of 26/09/00, final on 26/12/00
H46-2651 37387 Lambourdiere, judgment of 02/08/00, final on 02/11/00
H46-2652 39996 Ouendeno, judgment of 16/04/2002, final on 10/07/2002[105]
H32-2653 32510 Peter
H46-2654 33989 Thery, judgment of 01/02/00, final on 01/05/00
H46-2655 38042 Zanatta, A. and J.-B., judgment of 28/03/00, final on 28/06/00
H46-2656 53118 Boiseau, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H32-2657 31842 Darmagnac Pierre V
H46-2658 40493 Jacquie and Ledun, judgment of 28/03/00, final on 28/06/00
H46-2659 44617 Leray and others, judgment of 20/12/01, final on 20/03/02
H46-2660 42588 Linard, judgment of 25/06/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46-2661 43288 Mahieu, judgment of 19/06/01
H32-2662 25309 Maljean
H46-2663 45573 Moyer, judgment of 25/06/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46-2664 37565 Sapl, judgment of 18/12/01, final on 18/03/02
H46-2665 46708 Zaheg, judgment of 9/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H54-2666 36313 Henra, judgment of 29/04/98
H54-2667 36317 Leterme, judgment of 29/04/98
H54-2668 32217 Pailot, judgment of 22/04/98
H54-2669 33441 Richard, judgment of 22/04/98
H32-2670 27518 A.S.
H46-2671 47194 Leboeuf, judgment of 26/03/02 – Friendly settlement
H46-2672 38398 Leclercq, judgment of 28/11/00, final on 28/02/01
H46-2673 44791 Marcel, judgment of 09/04/02 – Friendly settlement
H32-2674 35259 Nagler
H46-2675 37257 Lucas, judgment of 28/11/00, final on 28/02/01
H46-2676 32033 Thurin, judgment of 28/11/00, final on 28/02/01
Section 6
- 37 cases against Greece
H46-2 38703 Agoudimos and Cefallonian Sky Shipping Co., judgment of 28/06/01,
final on 28/09/01
H46-878 55611 Xenopoulos, judgment of 28/03/2002, final on 04/09/2002[106]
H46-879 47891 Spentzouris, judgment of 07/05/2002, final on 07/08/2002
H46-2680 42079 E.H., judgment of 25/10/01, final on 27/03/02
H32-2681 32397 Sinnesael, Interim Resolution DH(99)130
H54-2682 21522 Georgiadis Anastasios, judgment of 29/05/97
H46-2683 53478 Sajtos, judgment of 21/03/2002, final on 21/06/2002
H32-2684 34373 Goutsos, Interim Resolution DH(99)558
H46-2685 47734 Adamogiannis, judgment of 14/03/2002, final on 14/06/2002
H46-2686 38178 Serif, judgment of 14/12/99, final on 14/03/00
H54-2687 18748 Manoussakis and others, judgment of 25/09/96
H46-2688 40434 Kosmopolis S. A., judgment of 29/03/01, final on 29/06/01
H46-2689 30342 Academy Trading Ltd and others, judgment of 04/04/00
H54-2690 28523 Portington, judgment of 23/09/98
H46-2691 38971 Protopapa and Marangou, judgment of 28/03/00, final on 28/06/00
H46-2692 40437 Tsingour, judgment of 06/07/00, final on 06/10/00
H46-2693 41459 Fatourou, judgment of 03/08/00, final on 03/11/00
H54-2694 20323 Pafitis and others, judgment of 26/02/98
H46-2695 38459 Varipati, judgment of 26/10/99, final on 26/01/00
H32-2696 34569 Société anonyme Dimitrios Koutsoumbos, société technique,
commerciale and touristique
H32-2697 32857 Stamoulakatos Nicholas I
H46-2698 37439 Agga, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00
H54-2699 19773 Philis 2, judgment of 27/06/97
H54-2700 18357 Hornsby, judgment of 19/03/97
H46-2701 37098 Antonakopoulos, Vortsela and Antonakopoulou, judgment of 14/12/99,
final on 21/03/00
H46-2702 31107 Iatridis, judgments of 25/03/99 and 19/10/00 (Article 41) – Grand Chamber
H46-2703 41209 Georgiadis Dimitrios, judgment of 28/03/00, final on 28/06/00
H46-2704 28802 Tsavachidis, judgment of 21/01/99
H54-2705 19233+ Tsirlis and Kouloumpas, judgment of 29/05/97
H46-2706 43597 Dionyssios Petrotos, judgment of 29/02/00 – Friendly settlement
H46-2707 34369 Thlimmenos, judgment of 06/04/00
H46-2708 38704 Savvidou, judgment of 01/08/00, final on 01/11/00
H46-2709 41867 Messochoritis, judgment of 12/04/01, final on 12/07/01
H32-2710 24453 Tarighi Wageh Dashti
H46-2711 46380 LSI Information Technologies, judgment of 20/12/01, final on 20/03/02
H54-2712 24348 Grigoriades, judgment of 25/11/97
H54-2713 23372+ Larissis and others, judgment of 24/02/98
- 2 cases against Hungary
H46-2714 32396 Magyar, judgment of 11/01/01, final on 11/04/01
H46-2715 38937 Erdős, judgment of 09/04/2002, final on 09/07/2002
- 112 cases against Italy
H46-323 33966 Bastreghi, judgment of 03/12/01 – Friendly settlement
H46-324 32363 Bertini, judgment of 03/12/01 – Friendly settlement
H46-325 37242 Caramanti, judgment of 03/12/01 – Friendly settlement
H46-326 31259 Rizzi, judgment of 03/12/01 – Friendly settlement
H46-697 44375 Rocchi Roberto, judgment of 29/03/01 - Friendly settlement
Section 6
H46-747 44362 Di Deco, judgment of 12/04/01 – Friendly settlement
H46-499 41829 Campomizzi, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00
H46-500 41833 Cardillo, judgment of 28/04/00, final on 28/07/00
H46-501 41821 Delicata, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00
H46-503 41831 Pio, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00
H46-504 41819 Quinci, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00
H46-505 41830 Raglione, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00
H46-507 41820 Sinagoga, judgment of 28/04/00, final on 28/07/00
H46-508 41837 Trotta, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00
H46-509 41841 Vay, judgment of 28/04/00, final on 28/07/00
H46-510 41818 Vero, judgment of 28/04/00, final on 28/07/00
H46-742 44365 Calvani, judgment of 21/11/00, final on 21/02/01
H46-743 44370 D’Innella, judgment of 21/11/00, final on 21/02/01
H46-744 44367 G.G. IV, judgment of 21/11/00, final on 21/02/01
H46-745 44369 Pe.C., judgment of 21/11/00, final on 21/02/01
H46-746 44368 Sapia, judgment of 21/11/00, final on 21/02/01
H46-2716 35243 N. and D.A., judgment of 18/07/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46-2717 37248 Vietti, judgment of 18/07/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46-2718 37019 A.M., judgment of 14/12/99, final on 14/03/00
H46-2719 31227 Ambruosi, judgment of 19/10/00, final on 19/01/01
H54-2720 14025 Zubani, judgments of 07/08/96 and 16/06/99
H32-2721 16609 Intrieri
H32-2722 27253 Biasetti
H46-2723 44955 Mancini Vittorio and Luigi, judgment of 02/08/01, final on 12/12/01
H32-2724 25650 Santandrea
H46-2725 41221 Troiani Marcello, judgment of 06/12/2001, final on 10/07/2002
H46-2726 40979 Conte Riccardo II, judgment of 05/04/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-2727 40954 D’Alessandro, judgment of 05/04/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-2728 44814+ M.A. and 81 others, judgment of 30/11/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-2729 40978 Mantini, judgment of 05/04/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-2730 40956 Marchetti, judgment of 05/04/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-2731 44344 Marcotrigiano, judgment of 19/12/00
H46-2732 41812 Piccirillo Aldo, judgment of 09/01/01 - Friendly settlement
H46-2733 43077 A.S. II, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-2734 43092 Ascierto Pietro, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-2735 43048 Bernardo, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-2736 43005 Bianchi Michele, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-2737 38973 Borrillo, judgment of 22/06/00 – Friendly settlement
H46-2738 40975 Bucci, judgment of 05/04/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-2739 43082 C.S., judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-2740 43081 C.T., judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-2741 43073 Camerlengo, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-2742 43007 Capasso, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-2743 43008 Catillo, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-2744 43107 Circelli Maria Carmela, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-2745 42989 Costantini, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-2746 40960 Dattilo, judgment of 05/04/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-2747 43014 D’Errico, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-2748 43044 De Cicco Giuseppe, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-2749 43003 De Fiore, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-2750 43013 De Nunzio, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-2751 42992 Del Grosso, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-2752 43047 Del Vecchio Edvige, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-2753 43009 Di Biase Maria, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-2754 42991 Falzarano, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-2755 43045 Forgione, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-2756 43049 Fusco Adelia, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
Section 6
H46-2757 43104 Galietti, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-2758 43002 Giorgio Nicola, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-2759 43103 Lombardi Gianfranco and 7 others, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-2760 43105 Intorcia, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-2761 43006 La Vista, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-2762 43080 M.A.P., judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-2763 42990 Manganiello, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-2764 40722 Marotta, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-2765 42988 Marucci, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-2766 42994 Mascolo, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-2767 43046 Masella, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-2768 43001 Masuccio, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-2769 42995 Mirra, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-2770 43071 Narciso, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-2771 43079 P.C. IV, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-2772 43089 Pellegrino Rossi, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-2773 43090 Perugini, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-2774 43106 Rossi Lina, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-2775 43108 Selvaggio, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-2776 43004 Verzino, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-2777 43078 Z., judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-2778 54288 Andreozzi, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46-2779 54297 Aniceto, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46-2780 54309 Carretta, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46-2781 54313 Castiello, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46-2782 54292 Cerasomma, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46-2783 54291 Caproni, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46-2784 54290+ D'Agostino Francesco, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46-2785 44401 Fermi and others, judgment of 06/11/01 – Friendly settlement
H46-2786 54280 Giordano, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46-2787 54302 Incollingo, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46-2788 54301 Jaculli, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46-2789 54294 Fiore Mario, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46-2790 54296 Manera, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46-2791 54306 Masia, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46-2792 54308 Mignanelli, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46-2793 54318 Picano, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46-2794 54279 Prete, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46-2795 54314 Quacquarelli, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46-2796 54284 Radicchi, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46-2797 54298 Sabetta, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46-2798 54311 Soave, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46-2799 54303 Spatrisano, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46-2800 54305 Tamburrini, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46-2801 54285 Tatangelo, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46-2802 54315 Tortolani, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46-2803 54295 Trovato, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46-2804 54317 Zullo Rocco, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46-2805 38415 C.M.F., judgment of 18/07/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46-2806 39797 Guazzone, judgment of 11/07/2002 - Friendly settlement (rectified on 01/08/2002)
- 1 case against Latvia
H46-2807 50108 Kulakova, judgment of 18/10/01 – Friendly settlement
Section 6
- 7 cases against Lithuania
H46-2808 37975 Graužinis, judgment of 10/10/00, final on 10/01/01
H46-2809 36743 Grauslys, judgment of 10/10/00, final on 10/01/01
H46-2810 34578 Jėčius, judgment of 31/07/00
H46-2811 47679 Stašaitis, judgment of 21/03/2002, final on 21/06/2002
H46-2812 42095 Daktaras, judgment of 10/10/00, final on 18/01/01
H46-2813 44558 Valašinas, judgment of 24/07/01, final on 24/10/01
H46-2814 44800 Puzinas, judgment of 14/03/02, final on 14/06/02
- 3 cases against Luxembourg
H46-7 41761 Scheele, judgment of 17/05/01, final on 17/08/01
H46-2815 21156 G.J., judgment of 26/10/00
H46-2816 45165 Matthies-Lenzen, judgment of 05/02/02 – Friendly settlement
- 7 cases against the Netherlands
H32-2817 14084 R.V. and others - Interim Resolution DH(2000)25
H46-2818 28369 Camp and Bourimi, judgment of 03/10/00
H46-2819 29192 Ciliz, judgment of 11/07/00
H46-2820 31725 Köksal, judgment of 20/03/01 – Friendly settlement
H46-2821 33258 Holder, judgment of 05/06/01 – Friendly settlement
H46-2822 36499 Samy, judgment of 18/06/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46-2823 34549 Meulendijks, judgment of 14/05/2002, final on 14/08/2002
- 6 cases against Poland
H46-2824 28358 Baranowski, judgment of 28/03/00
H46-2825 31382 Kurzac, judgment of 22/02/01, final on 22/05/01
H46-2826 38670 Dewicka, judgment of 04/04/00, final on 04/07/00
H46-2827 51669 Pałys, judgment of 11/12/01 – Friendly settlement
H46-2828 25874 Kawka, judgment of 09/01/01
H46-2829 33310 H.D., judgment of 20/06/2002 - Friendly settlement
- 4 cases against Portugal
H46-2835 37698 Lopes Gomes da Silva, judgment of 28/09/00, final on 28/12/00
H46-2836 37528 Martins and Garcia Alves, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H54-2837 15777 Matos and Silva and 2 others, judgment of 16/09/96
H46-2838 33290 Salgueiro Da Silva Mouta, judgment of 21/12/99, final on 21/03/00
- 1 case against Romania
H32-2839 32922 C.C.M.C.
- 7 cases against the Slovak Republic
H46-2840 34753 Jóri, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01
H46-2841 40345 Stančiak, judgment of 12/04/01, final on 12/07/01
H46-2842 29032 Feldek, judgment of 12/07/01, final on 12/10/01
H46-2843 32686 Marônek, judgment of 19/04/01, final on 19/07/01
H46-2844 46843 Remšíková, judgment of 17/05/01 - Friendly settlement
H46-2845 24530 Vodeničarov, judgment of 21/12/00
H46-2846 38794 J.K., judgment of 23/07/2002 - Friendly settlement
Section 6
- 2 cases against Slovenia
H46-2847 29462 Rehbock, judgment of 28/11/00
H46-2848 28400 Majarič, judgment of 08/02/00
- 4 cases against Sweden
H46-2849 26978 Beck, judgment of 09/01/01 - Friendly settlement
H46-2850 28222 Muonio Saami Village, judgment of 09/01/01 - Friendly settlement
H46-2851 32531 Jakola, judgment of 06/03/01 – Friendly settlement
H46-2852 30526 De Laczay Ervin and Olga, judgment of 24/09/2002 - Friendly settlement
- 12 cases against Switzerland
H46-2853 27154 D.N., judgment of 29/03/01 - Grand Chamber
H46-2854 33958 Wettstein, judgment of 21/12/00, final on 21/03/01
H46-2855 27798 Amann, judgment of 16/02/00 - Grand Chamber
H54-2856 23224 Kopp, judgment of 25/03/98
H46-2857 54273 Boultif, judgment of 02/08/01, final on 02/11/01
H46-2858 24699 VGT Verein Gegen Tierfabriken, judgment of 28/06/01, final on 28/09/01
H46-2859 37292 F.R., judgment of 28/06/01, final on 28/09/01
H46-2860 33499 Ziegler, judgment of 21/02/02, final on 21/05/02
H46-2861 27426 G.B., judgment of 30/11/00, final on 01/03/01
H46-2862 28256 M.B., judgment of 30/11/00, final on 01/03/01
H32-2863 27613 P.B.
H54-2864 19800 R.M.D., judgment of 26/09/97 - Interim Resolution DH(99)678
- 59 cases against Turkey
H46-2865 33322 Özdiler and Bakan, judgment of 27/06/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46-2866 29495 Erdemli, judgment of 30/10/01, final on 30/10/01
H46-2867 29295+ Ecer and Zeyrek, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46-2868 31850 Günay and others, judgment of 27/09/01, final on 27/12/01
H46-2869 34686 Sürek Kamil Tekin, judgment of 14/06/01 - Friendly settlement
H46-2870 29851 Zana, judgment of 06/03/01, final on 06/06/01
H46-2871 32983 Çavuşoğlu, judgment of 06/03/01 - Friendly settlement
H46-2872 24947 Ekinci Lalihan, judgment of 05/06/01 - Friendly settlement
H46-2873 31849 İşçi, judgment of 25/09/01 - Friendly settlement
H46-2874 24669 Karataş and Boğa, judgment of 17/10/00 - Friendly settlement
H46-2875 24937 Koç Fırat, judgment of 05/06/01 - Friendly settlement
H46-2876 24933 Kürküt, judgment of 10/07/01 – Friendly settlement
H46-2877 31733 Tuncay and Ozlem Kaya, judgment of 08/11/01 - Friendly settlement
H46-2878 28011 Yeşiltepe, judgment of 10/07/01 – Friendly settlement
H46-2879 35980 Z.E., judgment of 07/06/01 - Friendly settlement
H46-2880 29862 Bağci and Murğ, judgment of 10/07/01 – Friendly settlement
H46-2881 31882 Çakmak, judgment of 10/07/01 – Friendly settlement
H46-2882 32450 Çaloğlu, judgment of 10/07/01 – Friendly settlement
H46-2883 31896 Değerli, judgment of 22/05/01 - Friendly settlement
H46-2884 29866+ Demir C., Demir M. and Gül, judgment of 10/07/01 – Friendly settlement
H46-2885 29883+ Fidan, Çağro and Özarslaner, judgment of 10/07/01 – Friendly settlement
H46-2886 31787 Göktaş and others, judgment of 25/09/01
H46-2887 31249 Gündüz and others, judgment of 14/11/01 – Friendly settlement
H46-2888 24932 Kaplan, judgment of 26/02/02 – Friendly settlement
H46-2889 28013+ Karatepi and Kirt, judgment of 17/07/01 – Friendly settlement
H46-2890 34499 Kortak, judgment of 31/05/01 - Friendly settlement
H46-2891 31895 Morsümbül, judgment of 25/09/01 - Friendly settlement
Section 6
H46-2892 30495 Mutlu and Yildiz, judgment of 10/07/01 – Friendly settlement
H46-2893 28014+ Okuyucu, Kara and Bilmen, judgment of 17/07/01 - Friendly settlement
H46-2894 30453 Özata and others, judgment of 22/05/01 - Friendly settlement
H46-2895 29425 Özçelik and others, judgment of 10/07/01 - Friendly settlement
H46-2896 36760 Şanlı and Erol, judgment of 22/05/01 - Friendly settlement
H46-2897 37191 Yildirim and others, judgment of 25/09/01
H46-2898 34684 Yolcu, judgment of 05/02/02 – Friendly settlement
H46-2899 19264 Aktaş and others, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01
H32-2900 22907 Atatür A. and M., and Pamir
H46-2901 19266 Baltekin, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01
H46-2902 19267 Bilgin Mehmet and others, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01
H46-2903 19268 Bilgin Saniye and others, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01
H46-2904 19269 Bozkurt and others, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01
H46-2905 19272 Çalkan and others, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01
H46-2906 19273 Çapar, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01
H46-2907 19274 Çelebi Hamdi, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01
H46-2908 19275 Çelebi Yusuf, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01
H46-2909 19276 Çiplak and others, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01
H46-2910 19277 Daniş, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01
H46-2911 19278 Erol, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01
H46-2912 19280 Gökgöz, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01
H46-2913 19281 Gökmen and others, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01
H46-2914 38931 İ.S., judgment of 28/03/02 – Friendly settlement
H46-2915 19270 Ilhan Buzcu and others, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01
H46-2916 19283 Işik Ayşe and others, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01
H46-2917 19284 Işik Yilmaz and others, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01
H46-2918 19286 Karabulut Sefer, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01
H46-2919 19271 Nuriye Buzcu, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01
H46-2920 19287 Özen, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01
H46-2921 19288 Öztekin, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01
H46-2922 31312 Eğinlioğlu, judgment of 20/12/01 – Friendly settlement
H46-2923 29921 Büker, judgment of 24/10/00, final on 24/01/01
- 15 cases against the United Kingdom
H46-2924 48521 Armstrong, judgment of 16/07/2002, final on 16/10/2002
H46-2925 24724 T., judgment of 16/12/99 - Grand Chamber
H46-2926 24888 V., judgment of 16/12/99 - Grand Chamber
H46-2927 45276 Hilal, judgment of 06/03/01, final on 06/06/01
H54-2928 24839 Bowman, judgment of 19/02/98
H32-2929 27237 Govell
H32-2930 26109 Santa Cruz Ruiz
H54-2931 24838 Steel, Lush, Needham, Polden and Cole, judgment of 23/09/98
H46-2932 35394 Khan, judgment of 12/05/00, final on 05/10/00
H46-2933 28901 Rowe and Davis, judgment of 16/02/00
H46-2934 35718 Condron, judgment of 02/05/00, final on 02/08/00
H46-2935 33274 Foxley, judgment of 20/06/00, final on 20/09/00
H46-2936 39360 S.B.C., judgment of 19/06/01, final on 19/09/01
H54-2937 20605 Halford, judgment of 25/06/97 - Interim Resolution DH(1999)725
H46-2938 36670 Duyonov and others, judgment of 02/10/01 – Friendly settlement
c. PREPARATION OF THE NEXT DH MEETING
(834th MEETING, 9-10 April 2003)
(See Addendum Preparation of the next meeting)
Action
The Deputies are invited to approve the preliminary lists of items to be examined at the next DH meeting, which appears in Addendum Preparation of the next meeting to the present annotated agenda and order of business.
827th meeting (DH) – 11 and 12 February 2003
APPENDIX 3
827th METING OF THE MINISTERS’ DEPUTIES
(Strasbourg, 11 and 12 February 2003 – DH)
APPENDIX TO THE ANNOTATED AGENDA AND ORDER OF BUSINESS
Global list of Italian cases of length of proceedings (Section 4.3)[107]
- 1565 cases before the civil courts
H32-925 26017 A. and B.T., Interim Resolution DH(96)479
H32-926 40581 A. and M.B., Interim Resolution DH(99)564
H32-927 35284 A. L.M., Interim Resolution DH(99)565
H32-928 31643 A., G., C. and M.B., Interim Resolution DH(97)611
H32-929 36653 A., M., R. and R.Z., Interim Resolution DH(99)133
H32-930 27194 A.A. and L.M., Interim Resolution DH(97)22
H32-931 24166 A.A. I, Interim Resolution DH(96)471
H32-932 26021 A.A. II, Interim Resolution DH(96)478
H32-933 29135 A.A. III, Interim Resolution DH(97)365
H32-934 35296 A.A. IV, Interim Resolution DH(98)391
H32-935 26829 A.A.Q. I, Interim Resolution DH(96)615
H32-936 26846 A.B. IV, Interim Resolution DH(96)616
H32-937 37874+ A.B., E.F. and C.C., Interim Resolution DH(98)392
H32-938 30097 A.C. and C.R., Interim Resolution DH(97)444
H32-939 26036 A.C. II, Interim Resolution DH(96)480
H32-940 23588 A.C. III, Interim Resolution DH(97)559
H32-941 27985 A.C. V, Interim Resolution DH(97)159
H32-942 38148 A.C. VI, Interim Resolution DH(99)272
H46-327 44481 A.C. VII, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H32-943 26418 A.F. IV, Interim Resolution DH(96)521
H32-944 35334 A.F. V, Interim Resolution DH(98)393
H32-945 18067 A.G. I
H32-946 36627 A.G. II, Interim Resolution DH(99)134
H32-947 39129 A.G. III, Interim Resolution DH(99)474
H32-948 26413 A.I. I, Interim Resolution DH(96)522
H32-949 35304 A.I. II, Interim Resolution DH(98)394
H32-950 31640 A.M. A., Interim Resolution DH(97)612
H32-951 29668 A.M. IV, Interim Resolution DH(97)424
H32-952 31352 A.M. L., Interim Resolution DH(97)613
H32-953 26424 A.M. R., Interim Resolution DH(96)523
H32-954 38488 A.P. I, Interim Resolution DH(99)370
H46-955 35265 A.P. II, judgment of 28/07/99
H32-956 16480 A.R.
H32-957 24022 A.S., A.T. and M.S., Interim Resolution DH(95)262
H32-958 25999 A.T. IV, Interim Resolution DH(96)481
H32-959 27165 A.T. V, Interim Resolution DH(97)23
H32-960 24023 A.V., Interim Resolution DH(95)263
H46-961 40947 Abbate Giuseppe, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00
H32-962 28730 Abrami, Interim Resolution DH(97)246
H32-963 26842 Adamo Antonia, Interim Resolution DH(96)617
H46-964 40944 Adamo Nino Andrea, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00
H46-328 46515 Adriani, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H32-965 39882 Adrignola A., G., and P., Interim Resolution DH(99)566
H32-966 34854 Agnello, Interim Resolution DH(98)395
H46-967 40963 Aiello, judgment of 14/12/99, final on 14/03/00
H46-968 44392 Albergamo, judgment of 28/03/2002, final on 10/07/2002[108]
H46-969 49316 Albertosi, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02
H32-970 29158 Albertosi, Interim Resolution DH(97)298
H32-971 38519 Albini, Interim Resolution DH(99)371
H32-972 40617 Alborghetti and Brivio S., E., M.C., and R., Interim Resolution DH(99)567
H46-973 45078 Aldo Tripodi, judgment of 12/10/00, final on 12/01/01
H32-974 24033 Alessandrini, Interim Resolution DH(95)264
H46-975 49371 Alfonsetti, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H46-976 44383 Alicino, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H32-977 34838 Allegranzi, Interim Resolution DH(98)329
H46-978 51651 Allegri, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02
H32-979 19752 Aloe
H46-329 46964 Alpites S.P.A., judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-980 45084 Altamura, judgment of 12/10/00, final on 12/01/01
H32-981 34234 Altieri and Cifani, Interim Resolution DH(98)225
H32-982 27459 Aluffi, Interim Resolution DH(97)169
H46-983 49353 Am. M. and S.I., judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H32-984 37132 Amato, Interim Resolution DH(99)234
H32-985 27495 Ambiveri and Arnoldi, Interim Resolution DH(97)91
H32-986 26039 American Eagle S.r.l., Interim Resolution DH(96)482
H32-987 27982 Amighetti and Jolly Moto S.N.C., Interim Resolution DH(97)156
H46-988 52979 An.M., judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H32-989 29155 Andreoletti, Interim Resolution DH(97)299
H32-990 31635 Anfosso, Interim Resolution DH(97)614
H32-991 34841 Angeli, Interim Resolution DH(98)330
H32-992 24162 Angelone and Celeste, Interim Resolution DH(96)472
H46-330 47785 Angemi, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H32-993 40604 Annibale, Interim Resolution DH(99)568
H32-994 28592 Annunziata, Interim Resolution DH(99)51
H32-995 26444 Antognelli, Interim Resolution DH(96)524
H46-996 46993 Antonini C. and A., judgment of 16/01/01, final on 16/04/01
H32-997 26836 Antonini V. and I., Interim Resolution DH(96)618
H32-998 24796 Antoniotti, Interim Resolution DH(96)38
H32-999 27452 Aprile, Interim Resolution DH(97)51
H46-1000 45881 AR.GE.A S.n.c. en liquidation, judgment of 07/11/00, final on 07/02/01
H46-331 48412 Ar.M., judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02
H32-1001 24163 Archimede, Interim Resolution DH(96)224
H46-332 46958 Ardemagni and Ripa, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-1002 44628 Aresu, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02
H46-1003 46987 Arienzo, judgment of 16/01/01, final on 16/04/01
H32-1004 29720 Arlistico, Interim Resolution DH(97)547
H46-1005 38098 Arnò, judgment of 09/11/99
H46-703 51671 Arrigoni, judgment of 11/12/2001, final on 11/03/2002
H32-1006 20046 Arruzzolo
H32-1007 38138 Artefice, Interim Resolution DH(99)273
H32-1008 30099 Artuso Maria Nicoletta, Interim Resolution DH(97)445
H32-333 39900 Artuso Paolo
H32-1009 28383 Ass. Consumatori San Gregorio, Interim Resolution DH(98)161
H46-179 56084 At.M., judgment of 07/05/02, final on 07/08/02
H46-1010 44456 Atzori, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H32-1011 38520 Ausiello Pasquale, Interim Resolution DH(99)372
H32-1012 30094 Ausilio, Interim Resolution DH(97)446
H32-334 39137 Avallone
H32-1013 28729 Avellani, Interim Resolution DH(97)247
H32-1014 25287 Azzarà, Interim Resolution DH(96)483
H32-1015 29129 B.A. S., Interim Resolution DH(97)300
H32-1016 26849 B.M., Interim Resolution DH(96)619
H32-1017 35940 B.Z., Interim Resolution DH(99)52
H32-1018 39119 Baffoni, Interim Resolution DH(99)476
H32-1019 28727 Baglietto, Interim Resolution DH(97)248
H32-1020 40587 Bagnarelli, Interim Resolution DH(99)570
H46-1021 44433 Bagnetti and Bellini, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02
H46-704 51678 Baioni and Badini, judgment of 11/12/2001, final on 11/03/2002
H32-1022 26410 Bakovic, Interim Resolution DH(96)525
H32-1023 37135 Balderi, Interim Resolution DH(99)135
H46-1024 49362 Baldi, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H46-1025 47001 Baldini, judgment of 16/01/01, final on 16/04/01
H32-1026 34852 Balzani, Interim Resolution DH(98)331
H32-1027 27964 Baracchini, Interim Resolution DH(97)142
H32-1028 38101 Baranelli, Interim Resolution DH(99)274
H32-1029 35294 Barbagiovanni Gasparo, Interim Resolution DH(98)396
H32-1030 39117 Barbarino I, Interim Resolution DH(99)477
H32-1031 39142 Barbarino II, Interim Resolution DH(99)478
H46-1032 38109 Bargagli, judgment of 09/11/99
H46-1033 49377 Barnaba, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H46-1034 52987 Barone Antonio and others, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H46-1035 49369 Baroni and Michinelli, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H32-1036 34268 Barraco, Interim Resolution DH(98)226
H32-1037 38507 Bartolini I, Interim Resolution DH(99)373
H32-1038 39895 Bartolini II, Interim Resolution DH(99)571
H46-1039 44458 Bartolini III, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H32-1040 29662 Bartolucci, Interim Resolution DH(97)526
H32-1041 35342 Basile Bernardo Domenico, Interim Resolution DH(98)397
H32-1042 34863 Basile and Perazza, Interim Resolution DH(98)317
H32-1043 26011 Basile Rocco Antonio and Nicolò, Interim Resolution DH(96)484
H46-1044 40928 Battistelli, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00
H32-1045 34260 Baudone, Interim Resolution DH(98)227
H32-1046 35921 Bazzea, Interim Resolution DH(99)53
H46-1047 49315 Bazzoni, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02
H32-1048 39128 Bedin, Interim Resolution DH(99)479
H46-335 44511 Bellagamba, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H32-1049 27969 Belletti, Interim Resolution DH(97)146
H32-1050 27476 Bellio, Interim Resolution DH(97)170
H46-336 40977 Beltramo, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01
H46-337 44431 Beluzzi and others, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46-1051 51661 Beluzzi and Mangili, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02
H46-1052 52974 Beneventano, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H32-1053 30593 Berardini Angelo I, Interim Resolution DH(97)527
H32-1054 35286 Berardini Angelo II, Interim Resolution DH(99)54
H32-1055 26826 Bergonzini, Interim Resolution DH(96)620
H46-1056 44435 Berlani, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H32-1057 34869 Bernardi, Interim Resolution DH(98)398
H32-1058 34261 Bernardoni, Interim Resolution DH(98)399
H46-1059 46995 Berto, judgment of 16/01/01, final on 16/04/01
H46-705 51667 Bertot, judgment of 11/12/2001, final on 11/03/2002
H46-338 39883 Bertozzi, judgment of 27/04/00, final on 27/04/00
H32-1060 38493 Bertuccelli, Interim Resolution DH(99)374
H46-1061 44388 Besati, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02
H46-1062 51695 Bettella, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02
H46-339 44442 Bevilacqua, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H32-1063 29652 Bianchi Armando, Interim Resolution DH(97)425
H32-1064 26817 Bianchi Ines, Interim Resolution DH(96)621
H32-1065 26027 Biasci, Interim Resolution DH(97)52
H46-340 36811 Bielectric S.R.L., judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H32-1066 33802 Bimbi, Interim Resolution DH(98)162
H46-1067 40937 Binelis and Nanni, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00
H46-1068 49358 Bini, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H32-1069 34266 Bisaro, Interim Resolution DH(98)228
H32-1070 26845 Bizzotto, Interim Resolution DH(97)92
H46-341 44437 Bocca, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H32-1071 38482 Boccabella and Torlone, Interim Resolution DH(99)375
H32-1072 22944 Boccardi and Comune, Interim Resolution DH(96)225
H32-1073 35308 Bogliolo Giacomo I, Interim Resolution DH(98)400
H32-1074 35309 Bogliolo Giacomo II, Interim Resolution DH(98)401
H32-1075 35311 Bogliolo Giacomo III, Interim Resolution DH(98)402
H32-1076 27181 Bogliolo Mario, Interim Resolution DH(97)93
H32-1077 37175 Bolignari, Interim Resolution DH(99)136
H32-342 39121 Bolla
H46-1078 49313 Bonacci and others, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02
H32-1079 25257 Bonaccorso, Interim Resolution DH(96)163
H32-1080 34247 Bonanno, Interim Resolution DH(98)229
H46-343 44457 Bonelli, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H32-1081 38133 Bonetti, Interim Resolution DH(99)275
H32-1082 19838 Bonfanti I
H32-1083 19839 Bonfanti II
H32-1084 19840 Bonfanti III
H32-1085 19841 Bonfanti IV
H32-1086 19842 Bonfanti V
H32-1087 19843 Bonfanti VI
H32-1088 19837 Bonfanti VII, Interim Resolution DH(96)226
H32-1089 29150 Bonforte, Interim Resolution DH(97)301
H32-1090 26840 Bongianni R. and F. M., Interim Resolution DH(96)622
H32-1091 38516 Bongiovanni, Interim Resolution DH(99)376
H46-1092 45059 Bono, judgment of 17/10/00, final on 17/01/01
H32-1093 39902 Bonomi A. and S., Interim Resolution DH(99)572
H32-1094 38114 Bonvicini, Interim Resolution DH(99)276
H32-1095 31347 Bordogna, Interim Resolution DH(97)615
H32-1096 33782 Borracci, Interim Resolution DH(98)163
H32-1097 37148 Borromeo, Interim Resolution DH(99)137
H32-1098 31358 Borselli, Interim Resolution DH(97)616
H32-1099 24816 Boscaro, Interim Resolution DH(96)40
H46-1100 36608 Bosio and Moretti, judgment of 06/09/99
H32-1101 30108 Botta II, Interim Resolution DH(97)447
H32-1102 27979 Botti, Interim Resolution DH(97)154
H32-1103 21075 Bottiglieri
H32-1104 29650 Bramante, Interim Resolution DH(97)426
H32-1105 40620 Bricalli, Interim Resolution DH(99)573
H46-1106 51660 Brivio, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02
H32-1107 29139 Broccia, Interim Resolution DH(97)302
H32-1108 27952 Bruno Emanuele, Interim Resolution DH(97)175
H46-1109 52914 Bruno Paolo, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H46-344 44436 Buffalo s.r.l., judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H32-1110 33790 Buldini Kotecha, Interim Resolution DH(98)164
H32-1111 32284 Buompastore, Interim Resolution DH(98)22
H32-1112 34872 Buonfino, Interim Resolution DH(98)332
H46-1113 48419 Buonocore, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02
H46-345 46534 Burghesu, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H32-1114 39879 Burigat, Interim Resolution DH(99)574
H46-1115 51682 Butta, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02
H32-1116 34857 C. C., Interim Resolution DH(98)403
H32-1117 27988 C. D.C. (Di Cara), Interim Resolution DH(97)178
H32-1118 33131 C. D.L., Interim Resolution DH(98)101
H32-1119 39898 C., G., and N.A., and T.M., Interim Resolution DH(99)575
H46-1120 49302 C.A.I.F., judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02
H32-1121 38146 C.B. and F.E.V., Interim Resolution DH(99)277
H32-1122 38099 C.B.S., Interim Resolution DH(99)278
H32-1123 35912 C.C. and 5 others, Interim Resolution DH(99)55
H32-1124 31330 C.I.P.D.I. S.r.l., Interim Resolution DH(97)617
H46-346 46980 C.L., judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H32-1125 34243 C.L.P.C., Interim Resolution DH(98)230
H32-1126 30587 C.M. I, Interim Resolution DH(97)528
H32-1127 35944 C.M. II, Interim Resolution DH(99)56
H32-1128 30582 C.M.R. L.C., Interim Resolution DH(97)529
H32-1129 31641 C.R.A.D.C.C. S.r.l., Interim Resolution DH(97)618
H32-1130 35340 Cacace, Interim Resolution DH(98)404
H32-1131 37151 Caccamo, Interim Resolution DH(99)138
H32-1132 39875 Caccialupi Olivieri Parteguelfa and Ciarrocchi, Interim Resolution DH(99)576
H32-1133 26443 Cacciola, Interim Resolution DH(96)647
H32-1134 31334 Cairo, Interim Resolution DH(97)619
H32-1135 34829 Calandra, Interim Resolution DH(98)318
H32-347 35292 Calandrella F., P. and 2 others
H32-1136 38129 Calanna, Interim Resolution DH(99)279
H32-1137 19830 Calaudi
H46-1138 46541 Calbini, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H32-1139 40588 Calderone R., A.M., A.M., and E., Interim Resolution DH(99)577
H32-1140 35941 Caldora, Interim Resolution DH(99)57
H32-1141 35305 Calipso Montana s.r.l., Interim Resolution DH(98)406
H32-1142 27473 Calistri, Interim Resolution DH(97)180
H32-1143 26430 Callegari, Interim Resolution DH(96)527
H46-1144 36624 Calor Sud, judgment of 26/10/99
H46-1145 56092 Calvagni and Formiconi, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H46-1146 51649 Camici, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02
H32-1147 23203 Camodeca, Interim Resolution DH(96)227
H46-1148 48423 Campana, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02
H32-1149 27472 Campoli, Interim Resolution DH(97)53
H32-1150 37140 Canali, Interim Resolution DH(99)139
H46-1151 51680 Canapicchi, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02
H32-1152 34855 Canocchi, Interim Resolution DH(98)319
H46-1153 40959 Cantacessi, judgment of 14/12/99, final on 14/03/00
H46-1154 47004 Cantu, judgment of 16/01/01, final on 16/04/01
H32-1155 27959 Capezzali, Interim Resolution DH(97)139
H46-1156 41802 Capoccia Agnese, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00
H46-348 39881 Capodanno, judgment of 05/04/00, final on 05/04/00
H32-1157 38137 Caporaso Adamo, Interim Resolution DH(99)280
H46-1158 40951 Cappellaro, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00
H46-706 51696 Cappelletti and Dell’Agnese, judgment of 11/12/2001, final on 11/03/2002
H32-1159 39161 Capriotti, Interim Resolution DH(99)481
H32-1160 30583 Capulli, Interim Resolution DH(97)530
H46-1161 45074 Caputo, judgment of 12/10/00, final on 12/01/01
H46-1162 44382 Caracciolo, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02
H32-1163 33152 Carbonaro, Interim Resolution DH(98)102
H32-1164 25265 Carbone Alessandro, Interim Resolution DH(96)211
H32-1165 38523 Carbone Benito, Interim Resolution DH(99)377
H46-1166 51702 Carbone, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02
H46-350 46526 Carboni, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H32-1167 39165 Carcani and Monterosso, Interim Resolution DH(99)482
H32-1168 29153 Carcassi I, Interim Resolution DH(97)303
H32-1169 31339 Carcassi II, Interim Resolution DH(97)620
H32-1170 25230 Cariola E. and M.R., Interim Resolution DH(96)228
H32-1171 27179 Carlino, Interim Resolution DH(97)24
H32-1172 35297 Carloni Natale, Interim Resolution DH(98)407
H32-1173 27978 Carloni Paolo, Interim Resolution DH(97)153
H32-1174 37147 Carnevali, Interim Resolution DH(99)140
H32-1175 39159 Carozza, Interim Resolution DH(99)483
H46-1176 44516 Carrone, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02
H32-1177 35301 Carrubba, Interim Resolution DH(98)408
H46-1178 44399 Cartoleria Poddighe S.N.C., judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02
H46-351 45859 Caruso Giuseppina, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01
H32-1179 26035 Caruso Salvatore, Interim Resolution DH(96)486
H32-1180 26406 Caruso, Giardiello and Caruso, Interim Resolution DH(96)528
H32-1181 27182 Casanica, Interim Resolution DH(97)167
H32-1182 27470 Casavola, Interim Resolution DH(97)54
H32-1183 31335 Casilli, Interim Resolution DH(97)621
H32-1184 35332 Casini, Interim Resolution DH(98)409
H32-1185 37313 Cassa Edile della Provincia di Ascoli Piceno, Interim Resolution DH(99)578
H32-1186 37137 Cassandra Luigi II, Interim Resolution DH(99)207
H46-1187 40961 Cassetta, judgment of 14/12/99, final on 14/03/00
H46-1188 51679 Cassin, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02
H46-1189 40962 Castelli Elia, judgment of 14/12/99, final on 14/03/00
H32-1190 35333 Castelli Massimiliano, Interim Resolution DH(98)410
H32-1191 34233 Castellucci Galtrucco, Interim Resolution DH(98)237
H46-1192 44448 Castrogiovanni, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H32-1193 34843 Casula, Interim Resolution DH(98)411
H46-1194 46510 Catalano, judgment of 21/11/00, final on 21/02/01
H46-1195 45075 Catania and Zuppelli, judgment of 21/12/00, final on 06/04/01
H32-1196 29161 Cavadini, Interim Resolution DH(97)304
H46-352 45861 Cavallaro, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01
H32-1197 26860 Cavallin, Interim Resolution DH(96)623
H32-1198 38487 Cavallini and Gualersi, Interim Resolution DH(99)378
H32-1199 25215 Caviglia, Interim Resolution DH(96)164
H46-1200 52915 Cazzato, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H32-696 25249 Cazzorla and Gigante
H32-1201 34272 Cecchi, Interim Resolution DH(98)231
H46-1202 40936 Cecere (Maria Rosaria), judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00
H32-1203 27479 Cecere Pasquale, Interim Resolution DH(97)55
H32-1204 29138 Ceglia, Interim Resolution DH(97)305
H32-1205 37154 Celebre, Interim Resolution DH(99)141
H32-1206 29136 Celi Lelio, Interim Resolution DH(97)306
H32-1207 29647 Celi Leonida, Interim Resolution DH(97)427
H46-1208 44429 Centi I, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02
H46-1209 44432 Centi II, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02
H32-1210 39150 Centi, Interim Resolution DH(99)484
H46-1211 44377 Centineo, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H32-1212 27196 Centore, Interim Resolution DH(97)25
H32-1213 20554 Ceravolo
H46-353 36620 Ceriello, judgment of 26/10/99, final on 26/10/99
H32-1214 34830 Cerqueti, Interim Resolution DH(98)333
H46-354 46537 Cerulli and Zadra, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H32-1215 38504 Ceruti, Interim Resolution DH(99)379
H46-1216 48418 Cesaro, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02
H54-1217 22461+ Ceteroni, judgment of 15/11/96
H32-1218 35938 Chiapetto Vincenzo II, Interim Resolution DH(99)142
H46-355 45869 Chiappetta, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01
H32-1219 13569 Chiarelli
H32-1220 40582 Chinnici I, Interim Resolution DH(99)579
H46-1221 49374 Chinnici II, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H32-1222 26023 CI.ME.B. S.p.a., Interim Resolution DH(96)487
H46-1223 46989 Ciabocco, judgment of 16/01/01, final on 16/04/01
H46-1224 52970 Ciancetta and Mancini, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H32-1225 27469 Cianci G. and A., Interim Resolution DH(97)56
H32-1226 35928 Cibin, Interim Resolution DH(99)58
H32-1227 22527 Cicely and others, Interim Resolution DH(96)27
H32-1228 35303 Cicerone E., S., S. and D., Interim Resolution DH(98)453
H32-1229 29654 Cicino, Interim Resolution DH(97)467
H32-1230 39168 Cilea, Interim Resolution DH(99)485
H32-1231 31333 Ciliberti, Interim Resolution DH(97)622
H32-1232 31336 Cimenti, Interim Resolution DH(97)624
H32-1233 26862 Cimini, Interim Resolution DH(96)624
H32-1234 35914 Cimino Antonio, Interim Resolution DH(99)59
H32-1235 33792 Cims Iole, Interim Resolution DH(98)165
H32-1236 31346 Cims Marco, Interim Resolution DH(97)625
H32-1237 35902 Cipolletti, Interim Resolution DH(99)60
H46-356 46959 Circo and others, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H32-1238 36603 Cirillo, Interim Resolution DH(99)143
H32-1239 29648 Cirino, Interim Resolution DH(97)428
H46-1240 40955 Cittadini and Ruffini, judgment of 14/12/99, final on 14/03/00
H46-357 44504 Citterio and Angiolillo, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-1241 46999 Ciuffetelli, judgment of 16/01/01, final on 16/04/01
H32-1242 27474 Ciuffetelli, Interim Resolution DH(97)94
H46-358 47779 Ciuffetti, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H32-1243 25341 Civelek, Interim Resolution DH(99)580
H32-1244 37187 Clucher, Interim Resolution DH(99)144
H46-1245 43434 Cobianchi I, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01
H46-1246 45852 Cobianchi II, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01
H32-1247 31344 Coccia, Interim Resolution DH(97)626
H32-1248 37167 Coduto Fernando I, Interim Resolution DH(99)145
H32-1249 37181 Coduto Fernando II, Interim Resolution DH(99)146
H32-1250 38509 Cogo, Interim Resolution DH(99)380
H32-1251 40590 Colangelo, Interim Resolution DH(99)581
H46-1252 56095 Colasanti, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H32-1253 35925 Colautti, Interim Resolution DH(99)61
H32-1254 26024 Comentale, Interim Resolution DH(96)488
H32-1255 20010 Condoluci and Napoli
H32-1256 29669 Condoluci, Interim Resolution DH(97)429
H46-1257 44460 Condominio Citta di Prato, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H32-1258 34842 Condominio Rosa Dei Venti, Interim Resolution DH(98)334
H32-1259 12168 Condominio via Flaminia. 141
H46-1260 49375 Consalvo, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H46-359 46532 Conte Gaspare and others, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46-1261 32765 Conte Nunzio II, judgment of 17/10/00, final on 17/01/01
H32-1262 34239 Conte Riccardo, Interim Resolution DH(98)232
H32-1263 40589 Conti Elia, Interim Resolution DH(99)582
H46-360 47774 Conti Giuliana, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H32-1264 39160 Copropriété X., Interim Resolution DH(99)486
H32-1265 38128 Coralluzzo, Interim Resolution DH(99)281
H46-1266 48416 Corcelli, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02
H46-361 44385 Cornaglia, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46-362 46527 Corsi, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H32-1267 39140 Corso and Facchetti, Interim Resolution DH(99)525
H32-1268 27201 Cortellessa, Interim Resolution DH(97)26
H46-363 35616 Coscia, judgment of 11/04/00, final on 11/04/00
H32-1269 27199 Cosma Bonifacio, Interim Resolution DH(97)27
H46-1270 45884 Cossu, judgment of 07/11/00, final on 07/02/01
H46-364 46538 Costantini Francesco, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46-365 44500 Cova, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H32-1271 27164 Covi and Anzelini, Interim Resolution DH(97)28
H32-1272 19827 Crea
H46-1273 56085 Cristina, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H46-1274 49309 Crotti, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02
H32-1275 24027 Crovato, Interim Resolution DH(95)275
H32-1276 20332 Crupi and others
H32-1277 40583 Cucinotta Orazio, Interim Resolution DH(99)583
H32-1278 38105 Cucinotta Tullio, Interim Resolution DH(99)282
H46-366 45880 Cultraro, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H32-1279 28384 Cunsolo, Interim Resolution DH(98)166
H32-1280 34827 Curatola, Interim Resolution DH(98)335
H32-1281 26855 Curatolo and Marucchelli, Interim Resolution DH(96)625
H32-1282 38524 Curia, Interim Resolution DH(99)381
H32-1283 25240 Curio, Interim Resolution DH(96)473
H32-1284 25226 D. and P.D.R. and L.M., Interim Resolution DH(96)167
H32-1285 34859 D. S., Interim Resolution DH(98)337
H32-1286 40576 D., F., and F.M. and M.V., Interim Resolution DH(99)584
H32-1287 27178 D.C. III, Interim Resolution DH(97)57
H46-367 46536 D.C. IV, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46-1288 46507 D.G., judgment of 21/11/00, final on 21/02/01
H46-1289 44533 D.I., judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02
H32-1290 26026 D.M. III, Interim Resolution DH(96)489
H32-1291 26448 D.M. IV, Interim Resolution DH(96)529
H32-1292 16300 D.S. and O.P., Interim Resolution DH(96)112
H46-1293 52925 D’Alfonso, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H46-368 44513 D’Ammassa and Frezza, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02, revised
judgment of 09/01/03, final on 09/04/03[109]
H46-369 45872 D’Annibale, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01
H46-370 40216 D’Arrigo and Garrozzo, judgment of 21/11/00, final on 21/02/01
H32-1294 27200 D'Agata, Interim Resolution DH(97)29
H32-1295 20207 D'Agostino and Pugliese
H32-1296 38485 Dalla Pozza I, Interim Resolution DH(99)382
H32-1297 40597 Dalla Pozza II, Interim Resolution DH(99)585
H32-1298 29127 Dall'Acqua, Interim Resolution DH(97)307
H32-1299 27968 Dambra, Interim Resolution DH(97)145
H46-371 52921 Damiano, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H46-1300 49307 D'Amore, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02
H32-1301 40603 Dan, Interim Resolution DH(99)586
H32-1302 29163 Danesi, Interim Resolution DH(97)308
H32-1303 36651 Danieli, Interim Resolution DH(99)235
H46-1304 45890 D'Antoni, judgment of 07/11/00, final on 07/02/01
H46-1305 51662 D'Apice, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02
H32-372 17482 D'Aquino and Petrizzi, Interim Resolution DH(96)28
H46-1306 49318 D'Arrigo, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02
H32-1307 39147 Datti A. and F., and Bezzi, Interim Resolution DH(99)487
H32-1308 38139 De Agazio Fortunato III, Interim Resolution DH(99)283
H32-1309 37157 De Agazio Giancarlo, Interim Resolution DH(99)147
H32-1310 30102 De Camillis Emidio, Interim Resolution DH(98)168
H32-1311 23603 De Camillis Giovanni, Interim Resolution DH(97)95
H32-373 40566 De Cicco Concetta
H32-1312 33797 De Cicco Nicola, Interim Resolution DH(98)167
H32-1313 37134 De Cristofaro, Interim Resolution DH(99)148
H46-1314 51683 De Guz, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02
H46-1315 40974 De Lisi, judgment of 28/09/00, final on 28/12/00
H32-374 40580 De Lorenzi
H32-1316 26843 De Luca Gianni, Interim Resolution DH(96)661
H32-1317 22741 De Luca Vincenzo, Interim Resolution DH(96)34
H32-1318 24805 De Mita, Interim Resolution DH(96)45
H32-1319 26010 De Mori, Interim Resolution DH(96)491
H32-1320 36625 De Pasquale, Interim Resolution DH(99)149
H46-698 49372 De Pilla, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H46-1321 52920 De Rosa Francesco, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H32-1322 19559 De Santis Armando
H46-1323 49366 De Santis Giuseppe I, judgment of 25/10/01, final on, 25/01/02
H46-1324 49367 De Santis Guiseppe II, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H46-1325 52923 De Santis III, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H46-1326 44455 De Simine, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H32-1327 35287 De Simon and Incontrera, Interim Resolution DH(98)412
H32-1328 35300 De Simone and 6 others, Interim Resolution DH(98)454
H46-375 42520 De Simone Pasquale, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H32-1329 35949 De Simone, Interim Resolution DH(99)62
H32-1330 40567 Decaro G., A., M., and F., Interim Resolution DH(99)589
H46-1331 52968 Del Bono and others, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H32-1332 36640 Del Mistro, Interim Resolution DH(99)150
H32-1333 24644 Del Prete, Interim Resolution DH(96)229
H32-1334 35933 Del Sole, Interim Resolution DH(99)63
H32-1335 37183 Del Vecchio Michele, Interim Resolution DH(99)201
H32-1336 26015 Delfino, Interim Resolution DH(96)490
H46-1337 56106 Dell’Aquila, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H32-1338 32299 Della Corte, Interim Resolution DH(98)169
H46-1339 44408+ Delmonte and Badano, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02
H46-1340 38469 Deschamps, judgment of 15/02/00
H46-1341 40965 Di Annunzio, judgment of 05/04/00, final on 05/07/00
H32-1342 27974 Di Bella and others, Interim Resolution DH(97)150
H32-1343 24853 Di Blasio A. and L., Interim Resolution DH(97)96
H32-1344 38497 Di Caro, Interim Resolution DH(99)590
H32-1345 29143 Di Ciccio, Interim Resolution DH(97)470
H32-1346 37314 Di Cicco, Di Giammatteo and Fantini, Interim Resolution DH(99)644
H32-1347 34251 Di Domenico, Interim Resolution DH(98)234
H32-1348 29666 Di Donfrancesco, Interim Resolution DH(97)430
H32-1349 34851 Di Fabio I, Interim Resolution DH(98)338
H46-1350 49355 Di Fabio II, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H32-376 39138 Di Fant I
H32-377 39139 Di Fant II
H32-1351 35910 Di Florio, Interim Resolution DH(99)64
H46-1352 44495 Di Francesco, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H32-1353 39130 Di Gianfilippo, Interim Resolution DH(99)490
H32-1354 36629 Di Giovanni II, Interim Resolution DH(99)151
H46-699 44446 Di Girolamo and 6 others, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H32-1355 36645 Di Girolamo, Interim Resolution DH(99)152
H32-1356 25242 Di Gregorio, Interim Resolution DH(97)97
H46-1357 34256 Di Mauro, judgment of 28/07/99
H46-378 46976 Di Motoli and others, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-1358 52978 Di Niso, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H32-1359 35285 Di Prisco and Cappon, Interim Resolution DH(98)455
H46-1360 40970 Di Rosa, judgment of 14/12/99, final on 14/03/00
H32-1361 35923+ Di Salvo and Formica, Interim Resolution DH(99)65
H46-1362 45898 Di Teodoro and others, judgment of 07/11/00, final on 07/02/01
H32-1363 33153 Di Trapani and Crescimanno, Interim Resolution DH(98)123
H46-180 41740 Diebold, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H32-1364 26411 Diglio, Interim Resolution DH(96)530
H32-1365 34840 Dionisi, Interim Resolution DH(98)339
H32-1366 33160 Domenico and Giusa, Interim Resolution DH(98)103
H32-1367 34848 Donati, Interim Resolution DH(98)340
H32-1368 32285 Donato, Interim Resolution DH(98)23
H32-1369 29665 Donfrancesco M. and A., Interim Resolution DH(97)431
H46-1370 40925 D'Onofrio Francesco, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00
H46-379 46520 Dorigo Franco, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H32-1371 34870 D'Orsi, Interim Resolution DH(98)336
H32-1372 29159 Dotti, Interim Resolution DH(97)370
H32-1373 38513 Dulcamara and Del Vecchio, Interim Resolution DH(99)383
H32-1374 40579 E.A., Interim Resolution DH(99)591
H32-1375 38107 E.B., E.B. and M.B., Interim Resolution DH(99)284
H32-1376 27186 E.C. II, Interim Resolution DH(97)30
H32-1377 38484 E.D.C., Interim Resolution DH(99)384
H32-1378 19824 E.D.G., Interim Resolution DH(97)58
H32-1379 24817 E.F. and M.C.P., Interim Resolution DH(96)46
H46-380 44480 E.G., judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H46-1380 48422 E.I., judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02
H32-1381 24801 E.M. and A.P., Interim Resolution DH(96)47
H46-381 44519 E.M. II, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H32-1382 23600 E.M., R.V. and A.S.S.
H32-1383 23623 E.P. I
H32-1384 26043 E.P. II, Interim Resolution DH(96)492
H46-1385 40953 Ediltes S.n.c., judgment of 14/12/99, final on 14/03/00
H32-1386 24036 Elettrodiffusion S.p.a., Interim Resolution DH(96)35
H32-1387 27477 Elia, Interim Resolution DH(97)59
H32-382 39906 Emmebiemme S.r.l.
H46-1388 40976 Ercolino and Ambrosino, judgment of 14/12/99, final on 14/03/00
H46-1389 40926 F. I, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00
H46-1390 40971 F. II, judgment of 14/12/99, final on 14/03/00
H32-1391 30577 F., A.M., M.G. and P.P. S., Interim Resolution DH(97)531
H46-384 46524+ F., T. and E., judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H32-1392 27457 F.B. II, Interim Resolution DH(97)98
H32-1393 27458 F.B. III, Interim Resolution DH(97)99
H46-1394 44523 F.C. and F.G., judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H32-1395 35337 F.C. IV, Interim Resolution DH(98)413
H46-1396 51653 F.CA., judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02
H32-1397 26409 F.D.A. II, Interim Resolution DH(96)531
H32-1398 37143 F.D.L., Interim Resolution DH(99)153
H32-1399 38505 F.D.S., Interim Resolution DH(99)385
H32-1400 39869 F.D'A III, Interim Resolution DH(99)593
H32-1401 39870 F.D'A IV, Interim Resolution DH(99)594
H32-1402 39874 F.E., Interim Resolution DH(99)595
H32-1403 26029 F.L., Interim Resolution DH(96)493
H46-385 46533 F.L.S., judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H32-1404 26421 F.P. II, Interim Resolution DH(96)532
H32-1405 26422 F.P. III, Interim Resolution DH(96)533
H32-1406 38134 F.P.R., Interim Resolution DH(99)431
H32-1407 30597 F.R., Interim Resolution DH(97)532
H46-1408 44471 F.S. II, judgment of 21/12/00, final on 21/03/01
H46-386 39164 F.S.p.A. II, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01
H46-387 46971 F.T., judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H32-1409 34249 F.V., Interim Resolution DH(98)235
H32-1410 38499 Fabbiano, Interim Resolution DH(99)386
H32-388 26012 Facciolini
H32-1411 38136 Facciolini II, Interim Resolution DH(99)285
H32-1412 29040 Faieta, Interim Resolution DH(98)25
H46-389 46968 Falconi, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H32-1413 38474 Faldetta, Interim Resolution DH(99)387
H32-1414 36635 Falleni A. and M., Interim Resolution DH(99)154
H46-390 52972 Falzarano Carmine, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H32-1415 25264 Famas S.r.l., Interim Resolution DH(96)171
H32-1416 35319 Fanni Bruno, Interim Resolution DH(98)414
H32-1417 36638 Fanni Susanna, Interim Resolution DH(99)155
H46-391 47781 Farinosi and Barattelli, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H32-1418 39157 Fattore A. and M., Interim Resolution DH(99)491
H32-1419 40596 Fazioli, Interim Resolution DH(99)596
H32-1420 20042 Fedele
H46-1421 45892 Feffin, judgment of 07/11/00, final on 07/02/01
H32-1422 35935 Feliciano, Interim Resolution DH(99)66
H32-1423 27957 Feminella, Interim Resolution DH(97)137
H32-1424 39126 Feneziani, Interim Resolution DH(99)492
H46-1425 51675 Ferfolja, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02
H46-1426 52916 Ferrara Vincenza, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H46-1427 44405 Ferraresi, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02
H32-1428 25216 Ferrari Stefano, Interim Resolution DH(96)172
H32-1429 27456 Ferraro Salvatore, Interim Resolution DH(97)60
H32-1430 39156 Ferrazzini, Interim Resolution DH(99)493
H46-392 45870 Ferrazzo and others, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01
H32-1431 27197 Ferretti Amleto, Interim Resolution DH(97)31
H32-1432 26835 Ferretti Guido, Interim Resolution DH(96)626
H32-1433 39880 Ferron, Interim Resolution DH(99)597
H32-1434 33803 Ficara Carmela, Interim Resolution DH(98)170
H46-1435 45062 Ficara Domenico, judgment of 17/10/00, final on 17/01/01
H46-393 45868 Filippello Giorgio II, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01
H32-1436 38475 Filippello, Interim Resolution DH(99)598
H32-1437 34868 Filocamo and Dominijanni, Interim Resolution DH(98)341
H32-1438 32296 Filosa II, Interim Resolution DH(98)26
H46-1439 49317 Filosa, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02
H32-1440 27464 Finvilden S.r.l., Interim Resolution DH(97)61
H32-1441 30100 Fiorentino, Interim Resolution DH(97)448
H46-1442 44393 Fiorenza, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02
H32-1443 36611 Fioretto and De Luca, Interim Resolution DH(99)156
H32-1444 26832 Firme zia Lilla, Interim Resolution DH(96)627
H32-1445 38121 Florio and Butera, Interim Resolution DH(99)286
H32-394 38145 Focardi and Conti
H32-1446 24050 Foggetti and Quaini, Interim Resolution DH(95)280
H46-1447 44424 Follo, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H32-1448 36616 Fondificio A.C.F., Interim Resolution DH(99)157
H32-1449 39166 Fontana and Sartorio, Interim Resolution DH(99)495
H32-1450 29653 Foresta, Interim Resolution DH(97)432
H32-1451 27448+ Formica, Interim Resolution DH(97)62
H32-1452 26830 Formichetti, Interim Resolution DH(97)100
H32-1453 22975 Fornara and others
H32-1454 26420 Forni, Albanese, Centro Orafo Mantovano, Interim Resolution DH(96)534
H46-1455 45079 Fortunati, judgment of 12/10/00, final on 12/01/01
H46-1456 46996 Fracchia, judgment of 16/01/01, final on 16/04/01
H46-395 46965 Franceschetti and Odorico, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H32-1457 26022 Franceschi, Interim Resolution DH(96)494
H46-1458 46529 Franchina, judgment of 21/12/00, final on 21/03/01
H46-1459 49373 Franco, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H32-396 38118 Fraschetti
H32-1460 29124 Frediani, Interim Resolution DH(97)309
H32-1461 27192 Furnari A., G., G. and F., Interim Resolution DH(97)32
H32-1462 26415 Fusco G., F. and P., Interim Resolution DH(96)556
H32-1463 36655 G. D'A., Interim Resolution DH(99)159
H32-1464 16014 G. and A.P.
H46-1465 44510 G. and C.C., judgment of 23/10/01, final on 27/03/02
H32-1466 31355 G. and I.B., Interim Resolution DH(97)628
H46-1467 46997 G. Giappichelli Editore S.r.l., judgment of 16/01/01, final on 16/04/01
H32-1468 31356 G. S.r.l., Interim Resolution DH(97)627
H32-1469 33161 G., R. and V. V., Interim Resolution DH(98)104
H32-1470 35945 G.A. and 7 others, Interim Resolution DH(99)67
H32-1471 19496 G.B. II, Interim Resolution DH(97)110
H46-397 44397 G.B. IV, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H32-1472 33134+ G.B., A.C. and L.V., Interim Resolution DH(98)105
H32-1473 33136 G.B.C., Interim Resolution DH(98)106
H32-1474 32290 G.C. IV, Interim Resolution DH(98)342
H46-1475 44441 G.C. VII, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H32-1476 36605 G.C.VI, Interim Resolution DH(99)158
H32-1477 34236 G.D. II, Interim Resolution DH(98)236
H46-1478 44522 G.F. and others, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H32-1479 31645 G.F. II, Interim Resolution DH(97)629
H32-1480 27960 G.F.I, Interim Resolution DH(97)140
H32-1481 30598 G.G. III, Interim Resolution DH(97)533
H32-1482 29660 G.G.II, Interim Resolution DH(97)433
H32-1483 26016 G.I., Interim Resolution DH(96)495
H32-1484 24315 G.L. I, Interim Resolution DH(96)173
H32-1485 30585 G.L. II, Interim Resolution DH(97)534
H46-1486 51666 G.L., judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02
H32-1487 40614 G.L.S., Interim Resolution DH(99)599
H32-1488 25247 G.M. IV, Interim Resolution DH(96)174
H32-1489 27183 G.M. V, Interim Resolution DH(97)33
H32-1490 31351 G.M. VI, Interim Resolution DH(97)630
H32-1491 35330 G.M. VII, Interim Resolution DH(98)415
H46-398 37131 G.M.N., judgment of 02/11/99, final on 02/11/99
H32-1492 25266 G.M.N., Interim Resolution DH(96)175
H32-399 38503 G.P. and 25 others
H32-1493 31357 G.P. and F.C., Interim Resolution DH(97)631
H32-1494 33794 G.P. IV, Interim Resolution DH(98)171
H32-1495 38123 G.P.F. and M.V. II, Interim Resolution DH(99)289
H32-1496 27954 G.P.M., Interim Resolution DH(97)135
H32-1497 32287 G.R. and P.M., Interim Resolution DH(98)41
H32-1498 23300 G.R. and S.D., Interim Resolution DH(97)535
H32-1499 23480 G.R. II
H46-400 46543 G.S. and L.M., judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H32-1500 26447 G.S. III, Interim Resolution DH(96)535
H32-1501 27180 G.S. IV, Interim Resolution DH(97)34
H32-1502 29658 G.S. V, Interim Resolution DH(97)434
H32-1503 32281 G.S. VI, Interim Resolution DH(98)172
H32-1504 35312 G.S. VII, Interim Resolution DH(99)600
H32-1505 29670 G.V. I, Interim Resolution DH(97)435
H32-1506 32279 G.V. II, Interim Resolution DH(98)27
H32-1507 35341 G.V. III, Interim Resolution DH(98)416
H32-1508 38506 G.V. IV, Interim Resolution DH(99)389
H46-401 47786 G.V. V, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-700 44421 Galasso, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H32-1509 35315 Galazzi, Interim Resolution DH(98)417
H46-1510 39871 Galgani and De Matteis I, judgment of 28/09/00
H46-1511 44497 Galgani and de Matteis II, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H46-402 46963 Galiè, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H32-1512 26848 Galletti, Interim Resolution DH(96)628
H46-1513 46990 Gallo Carmelo, judgment of 16/01/01, final on 16/04/01
H32-1514 37163 Gambardella, Interim Resolution DH(99)160
H32-1515 33800 Gambini and Macchia, Interim Resolution DH(98)173
H32-1516 26828 Garavaglia, Interim Resolution DH(97)63
H32-1517 27956+ Garberi P. E. and M., Interim Resolution DH(97)632
H32-1518 30091 Garufi, Interim Resolution DH(97)420
H46-1519 51648 Gaspari, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02
H32-1520 25225 Gasparoli, Interim Resolution DH(96)176
H32-1521 31646 Gasperoni, Interim Resolution DH(97)633
H32-1522 33140 Gatta, Interim Resolution DH(98)107
H32-1523 34242 Gatti, Interim Resolution DH(98)418
H46-1524 49304 Gatto, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02
H46-1525 45873 Gaudino, judgment of 07/11/00, final on 07/02/01
H32-1526 36636 Gavoncini Lenci A. and A. and Scanu, Interim Resolution DH(99)161
H46-1527 52984 Ge.Im.A.S.a.s., judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H32-1528 36614 Gennari, Interim Resolution DH(99)162
H46-1529 56099 Genovesi, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H32-1530 23422 Gentile Italo, Interim Resolution DH(96)536
H32-1531 19870 Gerace
H32-1532 40602 Geva S.a.s., Interim Resolution DH(99)601
H32-1533 36623 Ghedina, Interim Resolution DH(99)163
H46-1534 38116 Ghilino, judgment of 02/11/99
H32-1535 30590 Ghirardi, Interim Resolution DH(97)536
H32-1536 26019 Ghiron, Interim Resolution DH(96)496
H32-1537 35266 Giacomon, Interim Resolution DH(99)68
H32-1538 28733 Giambrone, Interim Resolution DH(97)249
H32-1539 35908 Giampietri, Interim Resolution DH(99)69
H46-1540 40942 Gianetti and De Lisi, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00
H46-403 46528 Giannalia, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46-404 47773 Gianni, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H32-1541 25245 Giardinieri, Interim Resolution DH(96)177
H46-1542 45888 Giarratana, judgment of 07/11/00, final on 07/02/01
H46-1543 45109 Gibertini, judgment of 12/10/00, final on 12/01/01
H32-1544 33789 Gigante E. and N., Interim Resolution DH(98)192
H32-1545 35916 Gilio Benito, Interim Resolution DH(99)70
H46-1546 53361 Giomi, judgment of 05/10/00, final on 05/01/01
H32-1547 24322 Giorgi Alberti, Interim Resolution DH(95)417
H46-1548 40930 Giorgio, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00
H32-1549 22572 Giovanelli and Vicentini
H46-1550 46531 Giovannangeli, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H32-1551 21340 Giovannetti
H32-1552 18924 Giovannetti Graziani
H32-1553 32283 Giraldi Francesco, Interim Resolution DH(98)28
H32-1554 32294 Giraldi Germana, Interim Resolution DH(98)29
H32-1555 29141 Giraldi I, Interim Resolution DH(97)310
H46-405 45860 Giuseppe Nicola and Luciano Caruso, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01
H32-1556 27475 Giusti I, Interim Resolution DH(97)64
H32-1557 32297 Giusti II, Interim Resolution DH(98)30
H32-1558 26838 Giusto, Interim Resolution DH(96)629
H46-1559 40941 Glebe Visconti, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00
H32-1560 24542 Godet, Interim Resolution DH(96)230
H32-1561 33791 Golia Angelo, Interim Resolution DH(98)174
H32-1562 23431 Gracci, Interim Resolution DH(96)231
H32-1563 38486 Graizzaro, Interim Resolution DH(99)390
H32-1564 30092 Granatelli, Interim Resolution DH(97)449
H32-1565 21671 Granatiero Rosa and Raffaella
H32-1566 27963 Grande and others, Interim Resolution DH(97)181
H46-1567 45110 Grappio, judgment of 12/10/00, final on 12/01/01
H46-1568 44430 Grassi, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02
H46-1569 45886 Gratteri, judgment of 07/11/00, final on 07/02/01
H32-1570 27467 Gravagno Francesca, Interim Resolution DH(97)65
H46-1571 44512 Greco, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02
H32-1572 39151 Greppi, Interim Resolution DH(99)496
H32-1573 26408 Grignano, Interim Resolution DH(96)649
H32-1574 35907 Grilli, Interim Resolution DH(99)71
H46-1575 49308 Grimaldi, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02
H32-1576 26020 Grio, Interim Resolution DH(96)497
H32-1577 38511 Gris, Interim Resolution DH(99)391
H46-1578 49303 Grisi, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02
H32-1579 27986 Gualtieri, Interim Resolution DH(97)160
H46-1580 49321 Guarnieri, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02
H32-1581 24782 Gubitosi, Interim Resolution DH(96)51
H46-1582 52975 Gucci, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02, revised judgment of 01/10/2002,
final on 01/01/2003[110]
H46-181 44413 Guerrera Angelo Giuseppe, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-1583 44403 Guerrera I, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H46-1584 44423 Guerrera II, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H32-1585 33144 Guetti G, G. and G., Interim Resolution DH(98)108
H46-1586 45896 Guidi, judgment of 07/11/00, final on 07/02/01
H32-1587 31639 Gurciullo and Cappello, Interim Resolution DH(97)634
H46-1588 44502 Gusso and Grasso, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02
H32-1589 30109 Hay, Interim Resolution DH(97)450
H32-1590 22974 I. S. and M.A.T. I, Interim Resolution DH(96)178
H32-1591 29157 I. S. II, Interim Resolution DH(97)311
H32-1592 34839 I. S. III, Interim Resolution DH(98)343
H46-1593 40957 I., judgment of 14/12/99, final on 14/03/00
H46-406 40968 I.F., judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01
H46-707 51708 I.M., judgment of 11/12/2001, final on 11/03/2002
H46-1594 52957 I.P.A. S.r.l., judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H46-407 44418 I.P.E.A. S.R.L., judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H46-408 39116 I.R., judgment of 15/02/00, final on 15/02/00
H32-1595 36606 I.S. and M.A.T. II, Interim Resolution DH(99)165
H32-1596 35336 I.S. IV, Interim Resolution DH(98)419
H32-1597 37158 I.S. V, Interim Resolution DH(99)164
H32-1598 29126 Iaconetta, Interim Resolution DH(97)312
H46-1599 44530 Iacovelli, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H46-1600 40973 Iadanza, judgment of 14/12/99, final on 14/03/00
H46-1601 45885 Iannelli, judgment of 07/11/00, final on 07/02/01
H46-1602 49359 Iannetti, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H32-1603 30580 Ianni Domenico I, Interim Resolution DH(97)537
H32-1604 35295 Ianni Domenico II, Interim Resolution DH(98)420
H46-1605 46986 Ianni III, judgment of 16/01/01, final on 16/04/01
H46-409 44447 Ianniti and others, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46-1606 44514 Iezzi and Cerritelli, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02
H46-1607 45876 Il Messaggero S.a.s. I, judgment of 07/11/00, final on 07/02/01
H46-410 46516 Il Messaggero S.a.s. II, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46-411 46517 Il Messaggero S.a.s. III, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46-412 46518 Il Messaggero S.a.s. IV, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46-413 46519 Il Messaggero S.a.s. V, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46-701 44501 Il Messaggero S.A.S. VI, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H32-1608 39154 Il quadrifoglio" calzature-pelletteria di Maria Enrica Colombo S.a.s.,
Interim Resolution DH(99)497
H46-414 47777 Ilardi, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46-415 44508 Immobiliare Il Messaggero del geometra Antonio Iorillo, judgment of 25/10/01,
final on 25/01/02
H32-1609 34270 Immobiliare Li.ma. s.a.s., Interim Resolution DH(98)238
H32-1610 26853 Immobiliare San Teodoro s.r.l., Interim Resolution DH(96)631
H32-1611 34861 Imparato Francesco, Interim Resolution DH(98)344
H32-1612 29156 Inches, Interim Resolution DH(97)313
H32-1613 28728 Inteco S.r.l., Interim Resolution DH(97)250
H32-1614 33786 Iorillo Antonio, Interim Resolution DH(98)175
H46-1615 45875 Iorillo Debora, judgment of 16/01/01, final on 16/04/01
H46-1616 56088 IT.R., judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H46-1617 44396 Ital Union Servizi S.a.s. n° 1, judgment of 12/02/2002, final on 04/09/2002[111]
H46-1618 44913 Ital Union Servizi S.a.s. n° 2, judgment of 12/02/2002, final on 04/09/2002[112]
H46-1619 44914 Ital Union Servizi S.a.s. n° 3, judgment of 12/02/2002, final on 04/09/2002[113]
H46-416 39894 Italiano, judgment of 15/02/00, final on 15/02/00
H46-417 46530 Iulio, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H32-1620 35291 L. P., Ga. C. and Gi. C., Interim Resolution DH(98)421
H46-418 40924 L. S.r.l., judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00
H46-1621 44515 L., judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02
H46-1622 56087 L.B., judgment of 12/02/2002, final on 04/09/2002[114]
H32-1623 26018 L.C. II, Interim Resolution DH(96)498
H32-1624 26040 L.C. III, Interim Resolution DH(96)650
H32-1625 24024 L.D.C., Interim Resolution DH(95)284
H32-1626 35922 L.D.T., Interim Resolution DH(99)72
H32-1627 27973 L.F. IV, Interim Resolution DH(97)149
H32-1628 30088 L.F. V, Interim Resolution DH(97)451
H32-1629 36646 L.G. II, Interim Resolution DH(99)166
H32-1630 40575 L.G. IV, Interim Resolution DH(99)602
H46-1631 39487 L.G.S. S.p.a. II, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 06/09/01
H46-1632 40980 L.G.S. S.p.a., judgment of 05/04/00, final on 05/07/00
H32-1633 31354 L.L., C.S. and S.M., Interim Resolution DH(97)635
H32-1634 24825 L.M. V, Interim Resolution DH(96)474
H32-1635 32276 L.M. VI, Interim Resolution DH(98)31
H32-1636 36633 L.M.L., Interim Resolution DH(99)167
H32-1637 30576 L.P. I, Interim Resolution DH(97)538
H32-1638 36631 L.P. II, Interim Resolution DH(99)168
H32-1639 31329 L.R. B., Interim Resolution DH(97)636
H32-1640 27958 L.S. and T.R., Interim Resolution DH(97)138
H46-1641 52986 L.S., judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/022
H32-1642 26423 L.U., Interim Resolution DH(96)537
H32-1643 18664 La Ferrara and others
H32-1644 34853 La Gorga, Interim Resolution DH(98)422
H32-1645 33788 La Mantia, Interim Resolution DH(98)176
H32-1646 34845 La Monica, Interim Resolution DH(98)345
H32-1647 13570 La Porta
H32-1648 39152 La Rosa, Interim Resolution DH(99)498
H32-1649 38100 La Torre, Interim Resolution DH(99)290
H32-1650 28731 Labate A., G., S. and B., Interim Resolution DH(97)251
H46-1651 44520 Lagana, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02
H46-1652 33158 Laino, judgment of 18/02/99
H46-419 46542 Lanino, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H32-1653 19832 Lanzo
H32-1654 35919 Larotonda I, Interim Resolution DH(99)73
H32-1655 35920 Larotonda II, Interim Resolution DH(99)392
H32-1656 39866 Lasagna and Milandri I, Interim Resolution DH(99)603
H32-1657 39867 Lasagna and Milandri II, Interim Resolution DH(99)604
H32-1658 25237 Latella, Interim Resolution DH(96)232
H32-1659 26038 Laterza, Interim Resolution DH(96)499
H32-420 31341 Lazzari and Scagnoli
H32-1660 39144 Lazzari M. and C. and F., Interim Resolution DH(99)499
H32-1661 26844 Lazzarini, Interim Resolution DH(96)632
H32-1662 28726 Lealini, Interim Resolution DH(97)252
H32-1663 23604 Legge Massimo and Liberato, Interim Resolution DH(97)101
H32-1664 28721 Lelli G., L. and L., Interim Resolution DH(97)555
H32-1665 39158 Lenza, Di Stefano and Mancini, Interim Resolution DH(99)500
H32-1666 37171 Leo, Interim Resolution DH(99)169
H32-1667 39897 Leone Prefabbricati S.r.l., Interim Resolution DH(99)605
H32-1668 27188 Lepore Armando I, Interim Resolution DH(97)35
H32-1669 27993 Lepore Armando II, Interim Resolution DH(97)161
H32-1670 29128 Li Donni, Interim Resolution DH(97)314
H46-1671 44394 Liberatore, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H32-1672 35331 Liberi, Interim Resolution DH(98)423
H46-1673 40950 Liddo and Batteta, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00
H46-1674 49376 Lilla Santilli, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H32-1675 31327 Lilloni, Interim Resolution DH(97)638
H32-1676 34835 Limardi, Interim Resolution DH(98)346
H32-1677 35930 Lipari, Interim Resolution DH(99)74
H46-1678 45055 Lippera Zaniboni, judgment of 17/10/00, final on 17/01/01
H32-1679 38122 Lispi, Interim Resolution DH(99)291
H32-1680 29167 Litardi, Interim Resolution DH(97)315
H32-1681 34860 Liut, Interim Resolution DH(98)347
H46-421 45853 Lo Cicero, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01
H32-422 40571 Lo Sardo
H32-1682 35915 Lodi and Delmonte, Interim Resolution DH(99)75
H32-1683 25239 Lombardi Satriani I, Interim Resolution DH(96)180
H32-1684 26008 Lombardi Satriani II, Interim Resolution DH(96)500
H32-1685 34831 Lombardi Satriani III, Interim Resolution DH(98)320
H32-1686 35273 Lombardi Satriani IV, Interim Resolution DH(98)424
H46-1687 52958 Lombardo Francesco, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H46-423 46523 Lonardi, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46-708 51668 Lopriore, judgment of 11/12/2001, final on 11/03/2002
H32-1688 38132 Losardo, Interim Resolution DH(99)292
H32-1689 33842 Lucarini Maria Clementina II, Interim Resolution DH(99)393
H46-424 46962 Lucas International S.R.L., judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-1690 52919 Luciani, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H32-1691 27865 Lunari, Interim Resolution DH(97)253
H32-1692 39122 Lupi Giovanni II, Interim Resolution DH(99)501
H32-1693 25244 Luzi, Interim Resolution DH(96)181
H32-1694 38126 M. and G.P., Interim Resolution DH(99)502
H32-1695 33133 M. G., Interim Resolution DH(98)110
H46-1696 40940 M. I, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00
H46-1697 40931 M. II, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00
H46-425 44406 M. S.r.l., judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H32-1698 33154 M., G.F. and A.T., Interim Resolution DH(98)109
H32-1699 27953 M.A.D.F., Interim Resolution DH(97)134
H46-1700 45893 M.A.I.E. S.n.c., judgment of 07/11/00, final on 06/04/01
H32-1701 26000 M.C. C., Interim Resolution DH(96)651
H32-1702 24797 M.C. III, Interim Resolution DH(96)53
H32-1703 39135 M.C. IX, Interim Resolution DH(99)503
H32-1704 26833 M.C. V, Interim Resolution DH(96)662
H32-1705 34263 M.C. VI, Interim Resolution DH(98)239
H32-1706 37141 M.C. VII, Interim Resolution DH(99)170
H46-1707 38478 M.C. VIII, judgment of 09/11/99
H32-1708 18253 M.C., A.C., A.N.C., G.S. and E.S.
H32-1709 25228 M.D.M., Interim Resolution DH(96)182
H32-1710 34873 M.F. C., Interim Resolution DH(98)348
H32-1711 38525 M.G. II, Interim Resolution DH(99)394
H46-1712 49305 M.I. and E.I., judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02
H32-1713 31647 M.L. D.R., Interim Resolution DH(97)639
H32-1714 25231 M.L. II, Interim Resolution DH(96)183
H32-1715 31353 M.M. II, Interim Resolution DH(97)640
H46-1716 46985 M.Q., judgment of 16/01/01, final on 16/04/01
H32-1717 35943 M.R. I, Interim Resolution DH(99)100
H32-1718 38496 M.R.G. and E.F., Interim Resolution DH(99)395
H32-1719 26006 M.R.V., Interim Resolution DH(96)501
H32-1720 35934 M.S. and F.B., Interim Resolution DH(99)76
H32-1721 40578 M.S.A., Interim Resolution DH(99)607
H32-1722 27168 M.T. II, Interim Resolution DH(97)36
H32-1723 34252 M.T.P., Interim Resolution DH(98)240
H32-1724 32302 M.V., Interim Resolution DH(98)32
H32-1725 37133 M.V.F. and M.O.M., Interim Resolution DH(99)171
H32-1726 27169 M.Z., Interim Resolution DH(97)77
H32-1727 26028 Ma. C., Interim Resolution DH(96)652
H32-1728 25214 MA.RI.OR. S.a.s., Interim Resolution DH(96)184
H32-1729 37159 Maccà Amelia I, Interim Resolution DH(99)172
H32-1730 38110 Maccà Amelia II, Interim Resolution DH(99)293
H46-1731 44464 Maccari Ada, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H32-1732 39877 Macelloni, Interim Resolution DH(99)608
H32-1733 29663 Maffeo and Papa, Interim Resolution DH(97)548
H32-1734 27965 Maggi and Arcangeloni, Interim Resolution DH(97)143
H32-1735 39896 Maggioni and Rota, Interim Resolution DH(99)609
H32-1736 25263 Maggiore, Interim Resolution DH(96)185
H32-1737 35903 Magnano and Anselmo, Interim Resolution DH(99)77
H32-1738 35932 Magnante Trecco, Interim Resolution DH(99)78
H32-1739 34280 Magnaterra, Interim Resolution DH(98)241
H32-1740 27184 Magni, Interim Resolution DH(97)37
H32-1741 26007 Magno Di Gaspare, Interim Resolution DH(96)502
H32-1742 26859 Magri, Interim Resolution DH(96)633
H32-1743 34275+ Maiorano G, C., and M. and Serafini, Interim Resolution DH(98)242
H32-1744 24822 Majani S.p.a., Interim Resolution DH(96)113
H32-1745 25221 Maldini and Garulli G. B. and M., Interim Resolution DH(96)233
H46-426 46961 Maletti, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H32-1746 21076 Malvaso Maria Concetta and Carmela
H32-1747 20012 Malvaso Rocco
H32-1748 24332 Manca Antonio Gavina, Interim Resolution DH(95)425
H32-1749 31636 Manca Marisa, Interim Resolution DH(97)641
H46-1750 40938 Manca Renata and Maria, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00
H46-1751 46994 Mancinelli, judgment of 16/01/01, final on 16/04/01
H32-1752 34248 Mandelli, Interim Resolution DH(98)243
H32-1753 38104 Manieri, Interim Resolution DH(99)294
H46-709 51706 Mannari, judgment of 11/12/2001, final on 11/03/2002
H32-1754 34241 Manni Salvatore, Interim Resolution DH(98)244
H32-1755 29132 Manni, Interim Resolution DH(97)371
H32-1756 31350 Manotti, Interim Resolution DH(97)642
H32-1757 35314 Mansueto, Interim Resolution DH(98)425
H46-1758 44498 Mantini II, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H32-427 28725 Manzi A., B. and L.
H32-1759 29154 Manzinali, Interim Resolution DH(97)316
H46-1760 49370 Marcantoni, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H32-1761 28734 Marcellino, Interim Resolution DH(97)256
H32-1762 32278 Marcello, Interim Resolution DH(98)33
H32-1763 33142 Marchese Carlo, Interim Resolution DH(98)111
H32-1764 26403 Marchetti Alessandro I, Interim Resolution DH(96)653
H32-1765 25882 Marchetti Alessandro II, Interim Resolution DH(97)102
H46-428 44443 Marchi, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46-429 46957 Marcolongo, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H32-1766 37156 Marè, Interim Resolution DH(99)208
H46-430 44517 Mari and Mangini, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-1767 45063 Mari I, judgment of 17/10/00, final on 17/01/01
H46-1768 49365 Mari II, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H32-1769 38481 Marinelli and C.S.n.c. I, Interim Resolution DH(99)610
H32-1770 38514 Marinelli and C.S.n.c. II, Interim Resolution DH(99)611
H32-1771 38515 Marinelli and C.S.n.c. III, Interim Resolution DH(99)612
H32-1772 35335 Marinelli Guiseppe, Interim Resolution DH(98)426
H46-1773 49364 Marinelli Lucia, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H32-1774 33781 Marino Liliana, Interim Resolution DH(98)177
H32-1775 26005 Marino Ruggiero, Interim Resolution DH(96)503
H32-1776 37139 Marletta, Interim Resolution DH(99)173
H32-1777 25250 Marolda, Interim Resolution DH(96)186
H32-1778 29656 Martelli and Straccia, Interim Resolution DH(97)436
H46-1779 47784 Martinetti and others, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H32-1780 32298 Martino, Interim Resolution DH(98)34
H46-431 44422 Marzinotto, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46-1781 44496 Masala, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H46-1782 40972 Masi, judgment of 14/12/99, final on 14/03/00
H32-1783 37185 Massa, Interim Resolution DH(99)174
H46-432 46966 Massaro, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-433 46979 Mastrantonio Francesca, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H32-1784 34849 Mastrocinque Giovanni, Interim Resolution DH(98)321
H46-182 47479 Mastromauro S.R.L., judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H32-1785 27453 Matarrese and Di Masi, Interim Resolution DH(97)66
H32-1786 39141 Matera, Interim Resolution DH(99)504
H46-1787 52973 Mattaliano, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/0
H32-1788 35931 Matteoni O. F. A. and R., Interim Resolution DH(99)79
H46-434 44420 Mauri, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46-1789 44391 Mauti, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02
H32-1790 27187 Mazzà Giuseppe and others, Interim Resolution DH(97)38
H32-1791 26044 Mazzacuva, Interim Resolution DH(96)504
H32-1792 34828 Mazzella, Interim Resolution DH(98)322
H32-1793 33779 Mazzi, Interim Resolution DH(98)178
H32-1794 31328 Mazziotti, Interim Resolution DH(97)643
H46-1795 51655 Mazzoleni and others, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02
H32-1796 29142 Mazzoli and 8 others, Interim Resolution DH(97)317
H32-1797 26417 Mazzone, Interim Resolution DH(96)538
H32-1798 26254 Medzihradszky, Interim Resolution DH(98)112
H32-1799 24798 Meistro and Santin, Interim Resolution DH(96)475
H46-1800 44438 Mel Sud S.R.L., judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H32-1801 35917 Melchionna, Interim Resolution DH(99)80
H32-1802 26857 Meloni S.p.a., Interim Resolution DH(96)634
H32-1803 24789 Meluso Angelo I, Interim Resolution DH(96)66
H32-1804 26416 Meluso Angelo II, Interim Resolution DH(96)539
H32-1805 38471 Meluso Angelo III, Interim Resolution DH(99)396
H32-1806 38472 Meluso Angelo IV, Interim Resolution DH(99)397
H32-1807 35288 Mengano and Morini, Interim Resolution DH(98)427
H32-1808 34269 Mercandino, Interim Resolution DH(98)245
H32-1809 30578 Merlanti, Interim Resolution DH(97)539
H32-1810 26419 Merra, Interim Resolution DH(96)540
H46-719 56101 Mesiti, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H32-1811 37168 Messina Giuseppe I, Interim Resolution DH(99)175
H32-1812 40574 Messina Giuseppe II, Interim Resolution DH(99)613
H32-1813 29146 Mezzatesta, Interim Resolution DH(97)318
H46-1814 49311 Mezzena, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02
H46-1815 51654 Mezzetta, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02
H32-1816 33796 Micanzi, Interim Resolution DH(98)179
H32-1817 38130 Michieli and Gentilini, Interim Resolution DH(99)295
H32-1818 34847 Milani, Interim Resolution DH(98)428
H32-1819 33798 Milano, Interim Resolution DH(98)180
H32-1820 35906 Milazzo, Interim Resolution DH(99)81
H46-1821 48403 Minici, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02
H32-1822 32280 Minnai, Interim Resolution DH(98)35
H32-1823 33163 Minniti and Lucianò, Interim Resolution DH(98)113
H32-1824 25218 Minotti, Interim Resolution DH(96)187
H46-1825 45098 Miola, judgment of 12/10/00, final on 12/01/01
H46-1826 46540 MMB S.N.C. and Beloli, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H32-1827 36612 Mobilio, Interim Resolution DH(99)176
H32-1828 36609 Molari, Interim Resolution DH(99)177
H46-1829 48417 Mole, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02
H46-1830 51652 Molek, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02
H46-1831 51650 Molinaris, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02
H32-1832 34250 Monaco Maria, Interim Resolution DH(98)246
H32-1833 35909 Monorchio, Interim Resolution DH(99)82
H32-1834 39885 Montanari, Interim Resolution DH(99)614
H32-1835 32282 Monti, Interim Resolution DH(98)247
H32-1836 38492 Monticelli, Interim Resolution DH(99)398
H46-1837 49354 Morelli and Levantesi, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H46-435 46973 Morelli and Nerattini, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H32-1838 39120 Morelli F. and G., Interim Resolution DH(99)505
H46-1839 45066 Morena, judgment of 27/07/00, final on 27/10/00
H46-1840 48413 Morese II, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02
H46-1841 40932 Morese, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00
H46-1842 45067 Moretti, judgment of 27/07/00, final on 27/10/00
H32-1843 26428 Moroni, Interim Resolution DH(96)542
H32-1844 37138 Morra, Interim Resolution DH(99)178
H32-1845 34267 Morticella, Interim Resolution DH(98)248
H32-1846 39143 Moscarelli, Interim Resolution DH(99)506
H46-1847 52926 Mostacciuolo, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H32-1848 36641 Mostosi, Interim Resolution DH(99)179
H32-1849 36656 Motta Umberto S.R.L., Interim Resolution DH(99)180
H32-1850 35293 Mucciola and Bottino, Interim Resolution DH(98)429
H32-1851 37153 Mugnaini Brandani, Interim Resolution DH(99)236
H46-436 44490 Murgia, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-1852 46514 Murru I, judgment of 21/11/00, final on 21/02/01
H46-1853 45091 Murru II, judgment of 21/12/00, final on 21/03/01
H46-1854 45095 Murru III, judgment of 21/12/00, final on 21/03/01
H46-1855 44386 Murru IV, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02
H46-1856 56089 Murru V, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H32-1857 34846 Musci, Interim Resolution DH(98)323
H32-1858 26002 Muso Aurelio I, Interim Resolution DH(96)505
H32-1859 30087 Muso Rosina, Interim Resolution DH(97)452
H46-1860 44507 Musti and Iarossi, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H32-1861 39868 N.M. and A.M., Interim Resolution DH(99)615
H32-1862 35329 N.Z., Interim Resolution DH(98)430
H32-1863 20043 Napoli and Mammoliti
H32-1864 27970 Nardelli, Interim Resolution DH(97)147
H32-1865 29661 Nardone Angelo I, Interim Resolution DH(97)438
H32-1866 37173 Nardone Angelo II, Interim Resolution DH(99)181
H32-1867 29667 Nardone Antonio, Interim Resolution DH(97)437
H46-1868 40949 Nardone Ennio and Antonella, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00
H32-1869 27972 Naselli, Interim Resolution DH(97)148
H32-1870 39878 Nasto, Interim Resolution DH(99)616
H32-437 39872 Nata
H32-1871 38147 Nati II, Interim Resolution DH(99)296
H32-1872 33780 Nati, Interim Resolution DH(98)181
H32-1873 34277 Nazzaro, Interim Resolution DH(98)249
H32-1874 38500 Nembrini Gonzaga, Interim Resolution DH(99)399
H46-438 46522 Nolla, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H32-1875 38124 Novello, Interim Resolution DH(99)297
H46-1876 45072 Novotny, judgment of 27/07/00, final on 27/10/00
H32-1877 29646 O. S.a.s., Interim Resolution DH(97)439
H32-1878 38108 O.B. I, Interim Resolution DH(99)298
H46-1879 44506 O.B. II, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H32-1880 29657 O.C., Interim Resolution DH(97)440
H46-1881 51698 O.M., judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02
H32-1882 26837 O.O., Interim Resolution DH(96)635
H46-439 44494 O.P., judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-1883 49320 Onori, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02
H32-1884 38473 Orelli, Interim Resolution DH(99)400
H32-1885 27463 Orlando and Fiorentino, Interim Resolution DH(97)67
H32-1886 35905 Orlando, Interim Resolution DH(99)101
H32-1887 36622 Orlandoni and Lapis, Interim Resolution DH(99)182
H32-1888 25232 Ottelli, Interim Resolution DH(96)476
H32-1889 26861 Ozimo and Lamanna, Interim Resolution DH(96)636
H46-1890 51692 P. and M.O., judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02
H32-1891 34858 P. T. I, Interim Resolution DH(98)349
H32-1892 39864 P., M.R. and C.E., Interim Resolution DH(99)618
H32-1893 37144 P.A. I, Interim Resolution DH(99)209
H32-1894 37145 P.A. II, Interim Resolution DH(99)183
H32-1895 37146 P.A. III, Interim Resolution DH(99)184
H32-1896 26441 P.B. IV, Interim Resolution DH(96)543
H46-440 44468 P.B. V, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H32-1897 27161 P.C. and F.Z., Interim Resolution DH(97)40
H32-1898 27976 P.C. II, Interim Resolution DH(97)151
H32-1899 39162 P.C. III, Interim Resolution DH(99)507
H32-1900 38140 P.D.B, Interim Resolution DH(99)299
H46-1901 47000 P.I., judgment of 16/01/01, final on 16/04/01
H32-1902 14140 P.P. I
H32-1903 27460 P.P.II, Interim Resolution DH(97)68
H32-1904 25258 P.U. I, Interim Resolution DH(96)188
H32-1905 25259 P.U. II, Interim Resolution DH(96)189
H32-1906 25260 P.U. III, Interim Resolution DH(96)190
H32-1907 40568 Padalino R., C., and M.R., Interim Resolution DH(99)619
H46-441 40570 Padalino V. and G., judgment of 15/02/00, final on 15/02/00
H46-1908 35994 Paderni I, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 29/06/00
H32-1909 24334 Pala, Interim Resolution DH(95)428
H32-1910 36637 Paladini, Interim Resolution DH(99)185
H32-1911 28723 Pallotti, Interim Resolution DH(97)255
H32-1912 38127 Palmisano, Interim Resolution DH(99)312
H46-1913 49310 Palumbo, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02
H32-1914 40565 Panarari and Turani, Interim Resolution DH(99)620
H32-1915 30579 Panella Bruno I, Interim Resolution DH(97)540
H32-1916 31349 Panella Bruno II, Interim Resolution DH(97)644
H32-443 21707 Panissa, D., G. and A. Vittonetto
H32-1917 35302 Panozzo, Interim Resolution DH(98)431
H32-1918 32295 Pansa, Interim Resolution DH(98)36
H46-1919 46991 Paolelli I, judgment of 16/01/01, final on 16/04/01
H46-1920 44463 Paolelli II, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H32-1921 26033 Paolillo and Morini, Interim Resolution DH(96)506
H32-1922 40573 Paradiso Giorgio, Interim Resolution DH(99)621
H32-1923 24331 Parisi, Interim Resolution DH(95)429
H32-1924 25219 Parodi, Interim Resolution DH(96)191
H32-1925 40585 Pasinetti, Interim Resolution DH(99)622
H32-1926 34274 Pasquali Zanotti, Interim Resolution DH(98)258
H46-1927 45101 Pasquetti, judgment of 12/10/00, final on 12/01/01
H32-1928 28056 Pasquino, Interim Resolution DH(97)645
H32-1929 27160 Passarella, Interim Resolution DH(97)41
H32-1930 38096 Passerini I, Interim Resolution DH(99)300
H32-1931 38097 Passerini II, Interim Resolution DH(99)301
H32-1932 39125 Pasta, Interim Resolution DH(99)508
H46-1933 51657 Pastrello, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02
H32-1934 30095 Patelli and Pesenti, Interim Resolution DH(97)666
H32-1935 29169 Patrizi I, Interim Resolution DH(97)326
H32-1936 34833 Patteri, Interim Resolution DH(98)432
H46-1937 49396 Peda, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02
H46-1938 51700 Pelagagge, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02
H46-1939 56098 Pelagatti, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H32-1940 35338 Pellegrini Odilia, Interim Resolution DH(98)433
H32-1941 38489 Pepe, Interim Resolution DH(99)401
H32-1942 29664 Pepiciello, Interim Resolution DH(97)441
H32-1943 31337 Peresson, Interim Resolution DH(97)646
H46-1944 51699 Perico, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02
H32-444 39155 Perilli and Gigotti Micheli
H32-1945 24047 Perini, Interim Resolution DH(95)293
H46-1946 45894 Pernici and D'Ercole, judgment of 07/11/00, final on 07/02/01
H32-1947 25267 Perrone, Interim Resolution DH(96)192
H32-1948 29160 Pesaresi and 8 others, Interim Resolution DH(97)319
H32-1949 33147 Pesarin, Interim Resolution DH(98)114
H46-1950 40923 Petix, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00
H32-1951 25246 Petromilli, Interim Resolution DH(96)193
H32-1952 29137 Pettinelli, Interim Resolution DH(97)320
H46-446 44380 Pettirossi, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H32-1953 25248 Pezzati, Interim Resolution DH(96)194
H32-1954 30592 Pezzilli, Interim Resolution DH(97)541
H32-1955 34278 Pezzini, Interim Resolution DH(98)250
H32-1956 31644 Pia, Interim Resolution DH(97)647
H32-1957 29162 Piazzalunga II, Interim Resolution DH(97)321
H46-1958 51697 Piccinin, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02
H32-1959 26031 Piccinini I, Interim Resolution DH(96)654
H32-1960 33167 Piccininno, Interim Resolution DH(98)182
H46-1961 45878 Piccirillo Angela, judgment of 07/11/00, final on 07/02/01
H46-1962 47003 Piccoli, judgment of 16/01/01, final on 16/04/01
H32-1963 29655 Piccolo, Interim Resolution DH(97)442
H32-1964 35942 Picconi and Puggioni, Interim Resolution DH(98)434
H32-1965 31642 Pierfederici, Interim Resolution DH(97)648
H32-1966 29140 Pierucci, Interim Resolution DH(98)115
H32-1967 34862 Pioli, Interim Resolution DH(98)350
H32-448 39899 Pirilli
H32-1968 35283 Piscopo and 5 others, Interim Resolution DH(98)435
H46-1969 45874 Pittoni, judgment of 07/11/00, final on 07/02/01
H46-1970 51665 Plebani, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02
H32-1971 26445 Poddighe and others, Interim Resolution DH(96)544
H32-1972 35901 Poli, Interim Resolution DH(99)83
H46-1973 52976 Policriti and Gioffré, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H32-1974 34834 Polidoro, Interim Resolution DH(98)351
H32-1975 35317 Poligamma s.n.c., Interim Resolution DH(98)436
H32-1976 24794 Polperio and 7others I, Interim Resolution DH(96)71
H32-1977 24795 Polperio and 7 others II, Interim Resolution DH(96)72
H46-1978 44499 Pomante Pappalepore, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H32-1979 37164 Poppi, Interim Resolution DH(99)237
H46-1980 44454 Porcelli, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H32-1981 30584 Porfilio, Interim Resolution DH(97)542
H46-1982 40967 Privitera, judgment of 14/12/99, final on 14/03/00
H46-450 46967 Procaccianti, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-451 46969 Procopio, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H32-1983 27955 Proietti Valeri, Interim Resolution DH(97)136
H32-1984 37593 Provide S.r.l. I, Interim Resolution DH(99)624
H32-1985 40621 Provide s.r.l. II, Interim Resolution DH(99)625
H46-1986 49312 Provide S.R.L., judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02
H32-1987 13545 Provinzano
H32-1988 20235 Pucchielli
H32-1989 20208 Pucci
H32-1990 35911 Pucci and Veschi, Interim Resolution DH(99)84
H32-1991 27447 Puglia, Interim Resolution DH(97)69
H32-1992 25254 Pugliani and Cianca, Interim Resolution DH(96)195
H46-718 41803 Pupillo, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00; revised judgment
of the just satisfaction of 18/12/01, final on 18/03/02
H32-1993 39893 Quattrone Francesco, Interim Resolution DH(99)626
H46-452 44412 Quattrone Pasquale, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H46-1994 40927 R. I, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00
H46-1995 40964 R. II, judgment of 14/12/99, final on 14/03/00
H32-1996 26440 R.D., Interim Resolution DH(96)545
H46-1997 52971 R.L., judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H32-1998 33156 R.L.P., Interim Resolution DH(98)183
H32-1999 30090 R.M. IV, Interim Resolution DH(97)453
H46-2000 44526 R.P. and others, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02
H32-2001 24807 R.P. I, Interim Resolution DH(96)73
H32-2002 36626 R.P. II, Interim Resolution DH(99)210
H32-2003 34245 R.R., Interim Resolution DH(98)251
H32-2004 36602 R.S.p.A., Interim Resolution DH(99)186
H32-2005 26425 R.V. II, Interim Resolution DH(96)546
H46-2006 44381 Raffa, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H32-2007 26046 Raffi Giuliano I, Interim Resolution DH(96)507
H32-2008 26841 Raffi Giuliano II, Interim Resolution DH(96)637
H46-720 52962 Raffio, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H46-2009 44524 Ragas, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02, revised judgment of 17/12/02
(Article 41), final on 17/03/03[115]
H32-2010 35939 Ragnolini, Interim Resolution DH(99)85
H32-2011 27171 Ragusi, Bordandini, Pattuelli and Vidimian, Interim Resolution DH(97)42
H46-453 38498 Rando, judgment of 15/02/00, final on 15/02/00
H32-2012 27162 Ranucci, Interim Resolution DH(97)103
H46-2013 52913 Rapisarda, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H32-2014 19222 Rapotez
H32-2015 38495 Ravanelli, Interim Resolution DH(99)510
H46-2016 46984 Ravignani, judgment of 16/01/01, final on 16/04/01
H32-2017 35289 Redaelli Tecna S.p.a., Interim Resolution DH(98)437
H32-2018 26014 Reinaudo, Interim Resolution DH(96)509
H32-2019 26847 Reni, Interim Resolution DH(96)638
H32-2020 36652 Reniero, Interim Resolution DH(99)238
H32-2021 26001 Ricchiuto, Interim Resolution DH(96)510
H32-2022 38483 Ricci Maria Annina, Interim Resolution DH(99)402
H32-2023 35327 Ricci Riccardo, Interim Resolution DH(98)438
H46-2024 46988 Ricci Silvia, judgment of 16/01/01, final on 16/04/01
H32-2025 26030 Riccioni, Interim Resolution DH(96)511
H32-2026 36617 Rico Giovanni I, Interim Resolution DH(99)187
H32-2027 36618 Rico Giovanni II, Interim Resolution DH(99)188
H32-2028 17049 Righetti
H46-455 44465 Rigutto, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H32-2029 25256 Ristoro G., A. and A., Interim Resolution DH(96)196
H46-2030 49357 Rizio, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H32-2031 26404 Rizza, Interim Resolution DH(96)547
H46-183 44409 Rizzo Giuseppe, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02, rectified on 09/07/02
H32-2032 27983 Rizzo M. R. and G. and De Martino, Interim Resolution DH(97)157
H32-2033 38477 Rizzo, Interim Resolution DH(99)403
H32-2034 39892 Roberto R., M-L., C., and F., and Tudisco, Interim Resolution DH(99)627
H46-2035 51659 Roccatagliata, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02
H32-2036 31345 Rocchi Almerico, Interim Resolution DH(97)649
H46-184 51664 Rodolfi, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H46-2037 45887 Roma, judgment of 07/11/00, final on 07/02/01
H32-2038 26437 Romagnoli, Interim Resolution DH(96)548
H32-2039 33510 Romaniello G. and A., Interim Resolution DH(98)266
H32-2040 30089 Romaniello, Interim Resolution DH(97)454
H46-2041 52969 Romano Almanio Antonio, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H32-2042 38106 Romei, Interim Resolution DH(99)302
H32-2043 40572 Rondinone, Interim Resolution DH(99)628
H46-2044 44531 Rongoni, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H46-2045 40948 Ronzulli, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00
H46-2046 49361 Rosa Antonio, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H32-2047 36643 Rosa Elisabetta, Interim Resolution DH(99)189
H32-2048 34874 Roselli Italo I, Interim Resolution DH(98)439
H32-457 35328 Roselli Italo II
H46-2049 38480 Roselli Italo III, judgment of 15/02/00
H46-458 44479 Rosetti e Ciucci and C., judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H46-459 44527 Rossana Ferrari, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H32-2050 40598 Rossi Eufrasia, Interim Resolution DH(99)629
H32-2051 27971 Rossi Franca, Interim Resolution DH(97)171
H46-712 51710 Rossi Gianbattista, judgment of 11/12/2001, final on 11/03/2002
H46-2052 52988 Rossi Maria Giovanna, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H32-2053 34238 Rossi Romano, Interim Resolution DH(98)252
H46-460 44472 Rossi Valeria, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-710 51704 Rota Giacomo and Gianfranco, judgment of 11/12/2001, final on 11/03/2002
H46-711 51705 Rota Roberto and Giuseppe, judgment of 11/12/2001, final on 11/03/2002
H32-2054 25236 Rotella and Zuccalà, Interim Resolution DH(96)197
H46-2055 46513 Rotiroti, judgment of 21/11/00, final on 21/02/01
H32-2056 27977 Ruggeri, Interim Resolution DH(97)152
H32-2057 27478 Rullo Tassone, Interim Resolution DH(97)70
H32-2058 33143 S. C. IV, Interim Resolution DH(98)116
H32-2059 27962 S. D.P., Interim Resolution DH(97)141
H46-2060 40934 S., judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00
H46-2061 40184 S.A.GE.MA S.n.c. II, judgment of 27/04/00, final on 27/07/00
H32-2062 24042 S.B., Interim Resolution DH(95)298
H32-2063 26042 S.C. II, Interim Resolution DH(97)78
H32-2064 26405 S.C. III, Interim Resolution DH(96)549
H32-2065 26407 S.D., Interim Resolution DH(96)550
H32-2066 39118 S.G., Interim Resolution DH(99)526
H32-2067 39148 S.I.E.L.P.A. S.r.l., Interim Resolution DH(99)511
H32-2068 34864 S.I.P.I. S.n.c., Interim Resolution DH(98)324
H32-2069 38508 S.M., Interim Resolution DH(99)404
H32-2070 26414 S.P. and S.V., Interim Resolution DH(96)551
H46-2071 45061 S.S., judgment of 17/10/00, final on 17/01/01
H32-2072 24324 Sabia, Interim Resolution DH(95)441
H46-461 44461 Sacchi Roberto, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H32-2073 25107 Sacchi, Interim Resolution DH(96)115
H32-2074 37169 Salamanca, Interim Resolution DH(99)190
H32-185 30423 Salini Costruttori Spa, Interim Resolution DH(99)673
H32-2075 38111 Salomone, Interim Resolution DH(99)303
H32-2076 36642 Saltari, Interim Resolution DH(99)240
H32-2077 30104 Salvatore I, Interim Resolution DH(97)455
H32-2078 30105 Salvatore II, Interim Resolution DH(97)456
H32-2079 30106 Salvatore III, Interim Resolution DH(97)457
H32-2080 30110 Salvatore IV, Interim Resolution DH(97)458
H32-2081 30111 Salvatore V, Interim Resolution DH(97)459
H32-2082 30112 Salvatore VI, Interim Resolution DH(97)460
H46-2083 40943 Salvatori and Gardin, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00
H46-2084 49360 Salvi, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 27/03/02
H46-2085 44404 Salzano, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 04/04/01
H32-2086 31340 Sambati, Interim Resolution DH(97)650
H32-2087 27174 Samir, Interim Resolution DH(97)43
H46-462 38135 Sanna, judgment of 11/04/00, final on 11/04/00
H32-2088 35929 Santarcangelo, Interim Resolution DH(99)86
H32-2089 30588 Santella, Interim Resolution DH(97)543
H46-2090 45895 Santini, judgment of 07/11/00, final on 07/02/01
H32-2091 26034 Santonocito and others, Interim Resolution DH(96)512
H46-463 44466 Santoro Valerio, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-464 47780 Santorum, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H32-2092 32288 Sapuppo, Interim Resolution DH(98)37
H32-2093 35326 Sardo, Interim Resolution DH(98)441
H32-2094 40569 Sarti, Interim Resolution DH(99)630
H46-2095 45069 Sartori, judgment of 27/07/00, final on 27/10/00
H32-2096 30591 Sasso, Interim Resolution DH(97)544
H32-2097 38490 Saullo, Interim Resolution DH(99)405
H46-2098 49368 Savanna and La Selva, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H32-2099 33166 Savini and Malaspina, Interim Resolution DH(98)117
H46-465 45854 Savino, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 04/04/01
H46-2100 52977 Savona II, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H46-2101 38479 Savona, judgment of 15/02/00
H46-466 44419 Sbrojavacca Pietrobon, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H32-2102 34237 Scagliola, Interim Resolution DH(98)253
H32-2103 24021 Scala, Interim Resolution DH(95)299
H46-467 36621 Scalvini, judgment of 26/10/99, final on 26/10/99
H46-2104 44489 Scannella Giuseppe, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02
H32-2105 33793 Scannella, Interim Resolution DH(98)184
H32-2106 35904 Scappaticci A.F. and A., and Ruzza, Interim Resolution DH(99)87
H46-2107 40929 Scarano, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00
H32-2108 30096 Scerra, Interim Resolution DH(97)461
H32-2109 24780 Schiavone, Interim Resolution DH(96)76
H46-2110 40623 Sciarrotta and Guarino, judgment of 05/04/00
H46-2111 52918 Scinto, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H32-2112 32286 Scipioni, Mancini C.M., B. and D., Interim Resolution DH(98)38
H32-2113 24814 Scognamiglio II, Interim Resolution DH(96)116
H32-2114 38470 Scoppio, Interim Resolution DH(99)406
H32-2115 14578 Scotti II
H32-2116 26834 Scuderi Graziella, Interim Resolution DH(96)639
H46-2117 52983 Seccia, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H46-713 51672 Selva, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02
H46-2118 44467 Seminara, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H32-2119 38119 Serino Luigi, Interim Resolution DH(99)304
H46-2120 49306 Servillo and D'Ambrosio, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02
H46-2121 44402 Servodidio, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H46-2122 52959 Sessa, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H32-2123 33151 Sestito, Sestito and Zaccone, Interim Resolution DH(98)118
H32-2124 37155 Severino, Interim Resolution DH(99)191
H32-2125 33787 Sferlazza, Interim Resolution DH(98)185
H32-2126 33148 Sgrò, Interim Resolution DH(98)119
H32-2127 27984 Sgroi, Interim Resolution DH(97)158
H46-2128 40945 Siega and 7 others, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00
H32-2129 40577 Siena I, Interim Resolution DH(99)631
H46-2130 48415 Siena II, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02
H32-2131 26432 Siface, Interim Resolution DH(96)552
H32-2132 26825 Silvan S.p.a., Interim Resolution DH(96)640
H46-2133 44400 Silvestri, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02
H32-2134 27176 Simonetti (N.S.), Interim Resolution DH(97)39
H32-2135 30581 Simoni, Interim Resolution DH(97)545
H32-2136 26854 Simotti A, O. and M., Interim Resolution DH(96)641
H32-2137 26402 Siniscalchi and others, Interim Resolution DH(96)553
H46-2138 44493 Siper S.R.L., judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H32-2139 36604 Sirol Soc. Coop. a.r.l., Interim Resolution DH(99)192
H46-2140 52989 Sirufo, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H32-2141 25243 SO.CO.AB.S.r.l., Interim Resolution DH(97)291
H46-721 56093 Società Croce Gialla Romana S.a.s., judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H32-2142 35271 Società Sant'Andrea S.r.l., Interim Resolution DH(98)442
H32-2143 32289 Société Générale de Sucreries, Interim Resolution DH(98)39
H32-2144 34240 Somigli, Interim Resolution DH(98)254
H46-468 44491 Sonego, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H32-2145 33146 Sonego, Interim Resolution DH(98)120
H32-2146 39901 Sonzogno, Interim Resolution DH(99)632
H32-2147 34832 Sorace Carmelo, Interim Resolution DH(98)443
H32-2148 26004 Sorace Giuseppe I, Interim Resolution DH(96)513
H32-2149 38494 Sorace Giuseppe II, Interim Resolution DH(99)407
H32-2150 27468 Sorbo, Interim Resolution DH(97)168
H46-714 51670 Sordelli and C. S.n.c., judgment of 11/12/2001, final on 11/03/2002
H32-2151 25235 Sorrenti Alessandro II, Interim Resolution DH(96)198
H46-469 44470 Spada, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H32-2152 35299 Spadon, Interim Resolution DH(98)444
H32-2153 27195 Spadoni Giacomo, Interim Resolution DH(97)44
H32-2154 38125 Spadoni Maurizio, Interim Resolution DH(99)305
H32-2155 39132 Spampani, Interim Resolution DH(99)512
H46-715 51711 Spanu, judgment of 11/12/2001, final on 11/03/2002
H46-2156 46512 Sparano, judgment of 21/11/00, final on 21/02/01
H32-2157 34232 Sparti, Interim Resolution DH(98)267
H46-2158 44487 Spera II, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H32-2159 26839 Spiccia, Interim Resolution DH(96)642
H32-2160 36613 Spinato, Interim Resolution DH(99)193
H46-2161 56105 Spinelli, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H32-2162 29651 Spinosi, Interim Resolution DH(97)443
H32-2163 40618 Spitale, Interim Resolution DH(99)633
H32-2164 39873 Sportelli, Interim Resolution DH(99)634
H46-470 56094 Sposito, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H46-471 39705 Spurio II, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01
H32-2165 37142 Squeo, Interim Resolution DH(99)194
H46-2166 44503 Squillante Gennaro, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02
H32-2167 39136 Squillante Pasquale, Interim Resolution DH(99)513
H46-2168 52990 Stabile, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H32-2169 30586 Stacchiotti, Interim Resolution DH(97)651
H32-472 39865 Staffolani
H32-2170 35282 Statile, Interim Resolution DH(98)445
H46-2171 44518 Stefanini, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H46-702 49314 Steiner and Hassid Steiner, judgment of 06/12/2001, final on 06/03/2002
H32-2172 25229 Sterchele C. and C., Interim Resolution DH(96)199
H46-2173 47002 Storti, judgment of 16/01/01, final on 16/04/01
H32-2174 21507 Stringini, Interim Resolution DH(97)104
H32-2175 25252 Strongoli I, Interim Resolution DH(96)200
H32-2176 25253 Strongoli II, Interim Resolution DH(96)201
H46-2177 45056 Studio Tecnico AMU S.A.S., judgment of 17/10/00, final on 17/01/01
H32-2178 27173 Sud Ovest S.A.S., Interim Resolution DH(97)45
H32-2179 24039 T. s.r.l., Interim Resolution DH(95)302
H32-2180 37165 T.A.M., Interim Resolution DH(99)88
H32-2181 24040 T.M. and M.G.C., Interim Resolution DH(95)303
H32-2182 38521 T.M.A.2 S.r.l., Interim Resolution DH(99)408
H32-2183 35937 T.P. II, Interim Resolution DH(99)89
H32-2184 24803 T.S.I. s.r.l., Interim Resolution DH(96)77
H32-2185 23566 T.-S.I., Interim Resolution DH(97)297
H32-2186 35298 Taddei, Interim Resolution DH(99)90
H46-473 44417 Tagliabue, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H32-2187 33661 Tagliavini, Interim Resolution DH(98)446
H32-2188 36610 Talarico, Interim Resolution DH(99)239
H32-474 38102 Talenti
H46-2189 51656 Targi and Bianchi, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02
H46-2190 40933 Tarsia, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00
H32-2191 33165 Tartaglia I, Interim Resolution DH(98)121
H46-2192 48402 Tartaglia II, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02
H46-475 44486 Tebaldi, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H32-2193 13692 Tedesco I
H32-2194 13693 Tedesco II
H32-2195 40593 Tedesco Mario Felice, Interim Resolution DH(99)636
H46-476 44425 Tedesco Michele, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46-2196 46508 Teofili, judgment of 21/11/00, final on 21/02/01
H32-2197 35913 Tesolin S. and F., Interim Resolution DH(99)91
H32-2198 30589 Tessadri, Interim Resolution DH(97)546
H46-716 51673 Tiozzo Peschiero L. and L., judgment of 11/12/2001, final on 11/03/2002
H32-2199 26436 Todesco Aldo, Interim Resolution DH(96)554
H32-2200 38468 Tommaselli C., A., M. V. and G., Interim Resolution DH(99)409
H46-2201 45862 Tor Di Valle Costruzioni S.p.a. I, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 04/04/01
H46-2202 45863 Tor Di Valle Costruzioni S.p.a. II, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 04/04/01
H46-2203 45864 Tor Di Valle Costruzioni S.p.a. III, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 04/04/01
H46-2204 45865 Tor Di Valle Costruzioni S.p.a. IV, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 04/04/01
H46-2205 45866 Tor Di Valle Costruzioni S.p.a. V, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 04/04/01
H46-2206 45867 Tor Di Valle Costruzioni S.p.a. VI, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 04/04/01
H46-477 46539 Tor Di Valle Costruzioni S.P.A. VII, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46-2207 56100 Tor Di Valle Costruzioni S.p.a. VIII, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H32-2208 39123 Torregiani, Interim Resolution DH(99)514
H54-2209 26433 Torri, judgment of 01/07/97
H32-2210 39903 Torzo, Interim Resolution DH(99)637
H32-2211 39167 Tosone, Interim Resolution DH(99)515
H46-2212 45104 Trapani Francesco II, judgment of 12/10/00, final on 12/01/01
H32-2213 34265 Trapani, Interim Resolution DH(98)255
H46-2214 44439 Traspadini, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H32-2215 34856 Tripodi Giacinto, Interim Resolution DH(98)352
H46-2216 40946 Tripodi Giuseppe, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00, revised judgment of
23/10/01, final on 23/01/02
H32-2217 27177 Tripodo M, C. and G. and Leonardo, Interim Resolution DH(97)46
H32-2218 34230 Trippa, Interim Resolution DH(98)256
H32-2219 38491 Triuzzi, Interim Resolution DH(99)410
H32-2220 34844 Trivellini, Interim Resolution DH(98)353
H32-2221 27961 Troccolo and Carrassi L. and C., Interim Resolution DH(97)172
H46-2222 44478 Troiani I, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H32-2223 31637 Troncato, Interim Resolution DH(98)40
H32-2224 38510 Tulli, Interim Resolution DH(99)411
H46-2225 45879 Turchini, judgment of 07/11/00, final on 07/02/01
H32-2226 36632 Turetta, Interim Resolution DH(99)195
H32-2227 35267 Tuso, Interim Resolution DH(98)447
H32-2228 26013 Uricchio, Interim Resolution DH(96)514
H32-2229 27198 V. and R.R., Interim Resolution DH(97)47
H32-2230 29168 V. L.S., Interim Resolution DH(97)322
H32-2231 36628 V.B. II, Interim Resolution DH(99)196
H32-2232 36634 V.D.P., Interim Resolution DH(99)197
H46-186 51674 V.I., judgment of 11/12/2001, final on 04/09/2002[116]
H32-2233 31342 V.L., Interim Resolution DH(97)652
H32-2234 25234 V.M. I, Interim Resolution DH(96)202
H32-2235 29130 V.M. II, Interim Resolution DH(97)323
H32-2236 30216 V.N., Interim Resolution DH(97)653
H32-2237 33155 V.P. and F.P., Interim Resolution DH(98)122
H32-2238 26401 V.R. I, Interim Resolution DH(96)655
H32-2239 30103 V.R. II, Interim Resolution DH(97)462
H46-2240 52967 Vaccarella, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H32-2241 30101 Vaccari, Interim Resolution DH(97)463
H46-2242 46977 Vaccarisi, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H32-2243 23147 Vaggelli-Lupi, Interim Resolution DH(96)245
H46-2244 44459 Vairano, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H46-2245 49356 Valenti, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H32-2246 24793 Valentini, Interim Resolution DH(96)79
H46-2247 44398 Valentino, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H32-2248 38467 Valeri and Valeri and Rosa, Interim Resolution DH(99)412
H32-2249 37180 Valerio, Interim Resolution DH(99)198
H32-2250 34836 Valesani, Interim Resolution DH(98)354
H32-2251 27980 Valsecchi, Interim Resolution DH(97)155
H46-2252 44384 Valvo and Branca, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H32-2253 27455 Vannucchi, Interim Resolution DH(97)71
H46-717 51707 Vanzetti, judgment of 11/12/2001, final on 11/03/2002
H32-2254 40584 Vardaro, Interim Resolution DH(99)638
H32-2255 25251 Varvaro, Interim Resolution DH(96)477
H32-2256 36607 Vasto, Interim Resolution DH(99)241
H32-2257 37172 Vattano, Interim Resolution DH(99)199
H46-2258 56086 Vazzana, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H46-479 44488 Vecchi and others, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-480 44528 Vecchini, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H32-2259 34253 Vedovato, Interim Resolution DH(98)257
H46-722 52960 Ventrone, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H46-2260 56096 Venturin, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H46-481 44534 Venturini Alberto I, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-2261 44535 Venturini III, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H32-2262 33801 Verdelli, Interim Resolution DH(98)186
H32-2263 27166 Verini I, Interim Resolution DH(97)105
H32-482 40586 Verini II
H46-2264 46982 Verini III, judgment of 16/01/01, final on 16/04/01
H46-2265 46983 Verini IV, judgment of 16/01/01, final on 16/04/01
H46-2266 46992 Verini V, judgment of 16/01/01, final on 16/04/01
H32-2267 16087 Vernillo
H32-2268 35948 Verza, Interim Resolution DH(99)92
H32-2269 25222 Vesentini, Interim Resolution DH(96)203
H46-2270 52965 Vetrone, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H32-2271 18011 Vicari G., R., and V.
H32-2272 36654 Vicari I, Interim Resolution DH(99)200
H46-483 40599 Vicari II, judgment of 15/02/00
H32-2273 19835 Villani I
H46-2274 51663 Villanova, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02
H32-2275 35306 Vincenti Salvatore, Interim Resolution DH(98)448
H46-2276 40935 Vinci, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00
H32-2277 38501 Viola, Interim Resolution DH(99)413
H46-484 44395 Visentin, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46-485 37166 Vitale and others, judgment of 02/11/99
H32-2278 29144 Vitali I, Interim Resolution DH(97)324
H32-2279 34875 Vitone, Interim Resolution DH(98)235
H32-2280 29164 Vivian, Interim Resolution DH(97)325
H46-2281 45064 Von Berger Icilio and Luciano, judgment of 17/10/00, final on 17/01/01
H32-2282 26850 Von Berger Icilio I, Interim Resolution DH(96)644
H32-2283 26851 Von Berger Icilio II, Interim Resolution DH(96)645
H32-2284 26852 Von Berger Icilio III, Interim Resolution DH(96)646
H32-2285 35926 Von Berger Luciano I, Interim Resolution DH(99)93
H32-2286 35927 Von Berger Luciano II, Interim Resolution DH(99)94
H32-2287 27471 W.B., Interim Resolution DH(97)72
H46-486 44445 W.I.E. S.n.c., judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46-2288 45060 X200 S.R.L., judgment of 17/10/00, final on 17/01/01
H32-2289 39127 Zagato, Interim Resolution DH(99)516
H46-487 44462 Zanasi, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H32-2290 23587 Zanelli
H32-2291 40606 Zanon and Lazzaro, Interim Resolution DH(99)640
H32-2292 27185 Zappavigna and Andriano, Interim Resolution DH(97)48
H32-2293 27966 Zarzana, Interim Resolution DH(97)144
H32-2294 34257 Zavatta I, Interim Resolution DH(98)259
H32-2295 34259 Zavatta II, Interim Resolution DH(98)355
H32-2296 27175 Zilaghe and Dettori, Interim Resolution DH(97)49
H46-488 37079 Zironi, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01
H32-2297 27451 Zoccali, Interim Resolution DH(97)73
H32-2298 39133 Zoccola, Interim Resolution DH(99)517
H46-723 52963 Zotti and Ferrara I, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H46-2299 52964 Zotti and Ferrara II, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H46-2300 52966 Zotti, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H46-2301 45087 Zurzolo, judgment of 12/10/00, final on 12/01/01
- 7 cases concerning execution proceedings
H46-2302 40958 A.V. and A.B., judgment of 05/04/00, final on 05/07/00
H32-2303 34273 De Luca Antonio, Interim Resolution DH(98)233
H54-2304 15797 Di Pede, judgment of 26/09/96
H32-2305 35290 Finocchiaro, Interim Resolution DH(99)494
H46-2306 40969 Muso Aurelio II, judgment of 14/12/99, final on 14/03/00
H46-2307 40981 Muso Aurelio III, judgment of 05/04/00, final on 05/07/00
H54-2308 24295 Zappia, judgment of 26/09/96
- 117 cases before the administrative courts
H46-489 41809 A.B. V, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00
H46-187 56226 Abate and Ferdinandi, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H32-2309 29171 Abbate Giovanni, Interim Resolution DH(97)367
H54-2310 25587 Abenavoli, judgment of 02/09/97
H46-727 41806 Alesiani and 510 others, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H32-2311 26863 Almanno, Interim Resolution DH(96)611
H46-728 41805 Arivella, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H32-2312 25579 B.Q., Interim Resolution DH(96)213
H32-2313 26864 Bacci Roberto Maria, Interim Resolution DH(96)612
H32-2314 25585 Bagnoli and Mazzone G., A. and M., Interim Resolution DH(96)214
H32-2315 34878 Barcellona, Interim Resolution DH(99)202
H32-2316 35343 Bertozzi, Vorrasi, Ciarmoli and Forgione, Interim Resolution DH(99)642
H32-725 27189 Bevilacqua
H46-490 34437 Caliendo, judgment of 14/03/00, final on 14/03/00
H46-491 41817 Caliri, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00
H46-188 44341 Cannone, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002
H46-189 44347 Carapella and others, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002
H32-2317 19977 Carriero, Interim Resolution DH(96)26
H32-2318 31628 Catania, Interim Resolution DH(99)414
H32-2319 25576 Cavaliero s.n.c., Interim Resolution DH(96)215
H32-2320 34882 Cecamore, Interim Resolution DH(99)203
H46-2321 44332 Cecchini, judgment of 21/11/00, final on 21/02/01
H46-190 44350 Cecere Domenico, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002
H46-191 56222 Centis, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H32-2322 29170 Cerruto, Interim Resolution DH(97)368
H32-2323 29125 Chierici B. and E., Interim Resolution DH(97)331
H46-729 41804 Ciotta, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/011
H46-192 56206 Colonnello and others, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H46-2324 41811 Comitini, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46-193 56208 Conte and others, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H46-194 56202 Cornia, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H32-2325 27494 Corona Vincenzo, Interim Resolution DH(97)020
H32-2326 25577 Cosma, Interim Resolution DH(96)216
H32-2327 25588 D.M. II, Interim Resolution DH(96)217
H46-195 56224 D’Amore, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H32-2328 27996+ D'Amico and Altobelli, Interim Resolution DH(97)130
H46-196 56217 De Cesaris, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H54-2329 25574 De Santa, judgment of 02/09/97
H32-2330 20359 Della Sala Raffaele, Interim Resolution DH(96)614
H46-197 44337 Delli Paoli, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002
H46-198 56205 Dente, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H32-2331 14147+ Di Bonaventura
H46-199 56225 Di Pede II, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H46-200 56221 Donato, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H46-731 44525 Ferrari Marcella II, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H46-732 44379 Finessi, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H46-201 56212 Folletti, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H46-202 44349 Fragnito, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002
H32-2332 30600 G. D.P., Interim Resolution DH(97)525
H32-2333 25584 G.L.C., Interim Resolution DH(96)218
H32-2334 31622 G.O. II, Interim Resolution DH(97)654
H46-730 35956 Galatà and others, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46-737 44342 Gattuso, judgment of 06/12/2001, final on 06/03/2002
H46-203 44340 Gaudenzi, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002
H46-204 56203 Ginocchio, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H32-2335 25580 Giorgini, Interim Resolution DH(96)219
H54-2336 25586 Lapalorcia, judgment of 02/09/97
H32-2337 25581 Latini, Interim Resolution DH(96)220
H46-205 44334 Lattanzi and Cascia, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46-206 56204 Limatola, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H46-207 56207 Lugnan in Basile, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H32-2338 15080 Magnaghi, Interim Resolution DH(96)379
H32-2339 27994+ Manzini and Benet, Interim Resolution DH(97)129
H46-733 44343 Massimo Giuseppe I, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H46-734 44352 Massimo Giuseppe II, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H46-208 56220 Mastropasqua, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H32-2340 38149 Mazzone G. and E. (I), Interim Resolution DH(99)306
H32-2341 38150 Mazzone G. and E. (II), Interim Resolution DH(99)307
H46-2342 33804 Mennitto, judgment of 05/10/00
H32-2343 25589 Mentastro, Interim Resolution DH(96)221
H46-209 38594 Mereu and S. Maria Navarrese, judgment of 13/06/2002, final on 13/09/2002
H46-2344 44338 Miele, judgment of 21/11/00, final on 21/02/01
H46-493 41815 Monti Enrico, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00
H32-2345 17814 Mori Puddu, Interim Resolution DH(97)177
H46-494 41810 Mosca, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00
H32-2346 38526 Murgo M, O, and S. and Giannone, Interim Resolution DH(99)415
H32-2347 30322 Nani, Interim Resolution DH(98)193
H46-210 56211 Napolitano Giuseppe, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H46-211 44348 Nazzaro and others, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002
H54-2348 25839 Nicodemo, judgment of 02/09/97
H46-2349 44335 O., judgment of 17/10/00, final on 17/01/01
H32-2350 18908 P.P. III, Interim Resolution DH(97)111
H46-212 44351 Pace and others, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002
H32-2351 35950+ Paglietti and 126 others, Interim Resolution DH(99)99
H46-496 41816 Paradiso Antonio, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00
H32-724 15800+ Perego and Romanet
H46-213 56213 Piacenti, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H46-214 56223 Polcari, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H32-2352 34880 Polto Miranda, Interim Resolution DH(99)204
H46-215 56219 Presel, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H46-497 31631 Procaccini, judgment of 30/03/00, final on 30/03/00
H32-2353 27999+ Recinelli and Corona, Interim Resolution DH(97)132
H32-2354 27493 Recinelli, Interim Resolution DH(97)21
H32-2355 27997 Ridolfi, Interim Resolution DH(97)131
H46-735 44345 Rinaudo and others, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H46-216 56214 Ripoli I, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H46-217 56215 Ripoli II, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H32-2356 26865+ Rubbo and others, Interim Resolution DH(96)613
H32-2357 34881 Ruocco, Interim Resolution DH(99)643
H32-2358 25582 Sansoni, Interim Resolution DH(96)222
H32-2359 31625 Santoro Claudio, Interim Resolution DH(97)655
H46-218 56201 Sardo Salvatore, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H32-2360 29672 Scopelliti II, Interim Resolution DH(97)469
H32-2361 27484+ Serino and others, Interim Resolution DH(97)133
H32-2362 25450 Spera Michele, Interim Resolution DH(97)372
H46-219 56218 Stabile Michele, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H32-2363 34283 Stampacchia, Interim Resolution DH(98)272
H32-2364 25583 Stracuzzi, Interim Resolution DH(96)241
H32-2365 25578 Turrina and Scattolini, Interim Resolution DH(96)223
H32-2366 31620 U. P., Interim Resolution DH(97)656
H32-2367 38152 Ullo, Interim Resolution DH(99)308
H46-738 44333 V.P. and F.D.R., judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H46-736 44346 Venturini Alberto II, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H32-2368 29301 Vitali II, Interim Resolution DH(97)332
H32-2369 29302 Vitali III, Interim Resolution DH(97)333
H32-2370 39170 Zappalà, Interim Resolution DH(99)523
H46-498 41814 Zeoli and 34 others, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 05/10/00
- 363 cases before the labour courts
H46-2371 44390 A.V. II, judgment of 06/11/01, final on 06/02/02
H32-2372 27991+ Accuosto and Saviello, Interim Resolution DH(97)166
H46-224 51031 Aceto and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-2373 38141 Altieri, Interim Resolution DH(99)313
H46-2374 48421 Altomonte, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02
H32-2375 36648 Ambrosino Antonio, Interim Resolution DH(99)211
H32-2376 33145 Antonini Giuseppe, Interim Resolution DH(98)124
H32-2377 28771 Apicella, Interim Resolution DH(97)290
H46-2378 32375 Aprile De Puoti, judgment of 09/11/99
H46-225 51089 Armellino Francesco, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-2379 51093 Armellino Lucia, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-2380 44469 Ascolinio, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H32-2381 27462 Bagli and Musumeci, Interim Resolution DH(97)79
H32-2382 39891 Balbi, Interim Resolution DH(99)645
H32-2383 40605 Barone Maria, Interim Resolution DH(99)646
H32-2384 34271 Belloni, Interim Resolution DH(98)260
H46-226 52824 Belviso and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-2385 38115 Ben Charfeddine, Interim Resolution DH(99)314
H32-2386 28769 Benedetto, Interim Resolution DH(97)257
H46-2387 56091 Bernardini, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H46-2388 56103 Bevilacqua Giovanni, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H46-227 52804 Bianco Pellegrino, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-228 52816 Biondi and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-229 51030 Biondo, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-2389 35918 Buffa, Interim Resolution DH(99)95
H32-2390 29645 C.A., Interim Resolution DH(97)418
H46-2391 45883 C.a.r.l. en Liquidation II, judgment of 16/01/01, final on 16/04/01
H46-2392 45882 C.a.r.l.en Liquidation I, judgment of 16/01/01, final on 16/04/01
H32-2393 26439 Cagnetta, Interim Resolution DH(96)559
H32-2394 28747 Cairella, Interim Resolution DH(97)258
H46-2395 51150 Calabrese, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-2396 48408 Calo, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02
H32-2397 40595 Camerino, Interim Resolution DH(99)648
H32-2398 39169 Capoluongo Giuseppe, Interim Resolution DH(99)649
H32-2399 40619 Capoluongo M.R.V., Interim Resolution DH(99)650
H32-2400 28745 Caporaso Carmela, Interim Resolution DH(97)259
H32-2401 38142 Capozzi Di Stefano, Interim Resolution DH(99)316
H32-516 36615 Cappello, Interim Resolution DH(99)212
H32-2402 38120 Cappelloni, Interim Resolution DH(99)315
H46-2403 49319 Capri, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02
H32-517 38095 Cardillo, Interim Resolution DH(99)317
H46-2404 51134 Cardo Cristina, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-2406 51146 Cardo Elisa, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-2407 48414 Carlucci, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02
H46-2408 51127 Carolla, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02, revised judgment of 28/11/2002,
final on 28/02/2003[117]
H32-2409 40612 Caruso Angelina, Interim Resolution DH(99)652
H32-2410 35339 Cascone and Marrazzo, Interim Resolution DH(98)449
H32-2411 37136 Cassandra Luigi I, Interim Resolution DH(99)213
H32-2412 40600 Celentano, Interim Resolution DH(99)653
H46-230 52835 Cerbo and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-2413 29131 Cherubini, Interim Resolution DH(97)369
H46-2414 56102 Ciampaglia, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H46-231 52801 Ciarmoli, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-518 46521 Ciccardi, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H32-2415 31343 Cimadoro, Interim Resolution DH(97)623
H46-232 52815 Cimmino and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-2416 51112 Circelli Maria Antonia, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-2417 28741 Circelli, Interim Resolution DH(97)260
H46-233 52807 Ciullo, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-2418 28739 Cocchiaro, Interim Resolution DH(97)261
H46-520 44532 Colacrai, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 12/12/01
H46-234 52821 Colangelo Domenico, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-2419 51116 Colella, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-2420 26827 Conti Filippo, Interim Resolution DH(96)663
H32-2421 39888 Coppola, Interim Resolution DH(99)651
H32-2422 38502 Corrarello I, Interim Resolution DH(99)416
H32-2423 39149 Corrarello II, Interim Resolution DH(99)518
H32-2424 39146 Correnti, Interim Resolution DH(99)519
H46-2425 51147 Crisci, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-235 51164 Crovella, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-2427 56104 Cullari, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H46-2428 51154 Cuozzo Francesco, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-2429 51149 Cuozzo Giovanna, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-2430 28766+ Cusano and La Salvia, Interim Resolution DH(97)262
H32-2431 37186 Cutillo, Interim Resolution DH(99)214
H46-236 51163 D’Angelo Michele, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-2939 33141 De Candia, Interim Resolution DH(98)125
H46-237 51125 De Filippo, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-2405 51098 De la Rosa Giovanna, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-2940 28763 De Luca Maria, Interim Resolution DH(97)264
H46-2426 51141 De Rosa Maria, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-2941 34254 De Sando, Interim Resolution DH(98)261
H46-3110 51137 Del Grosso Nicola, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-2942 28767 Del Pozzo, Interim Resolution DH(97)265
H46-3111 51160 Del Re, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-238 51027 Del Vecchio Anna Rita, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-239 51155 Della Ratta, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-2943 28736 Delle Donne, Interim Resolution DH(97)266
H46-3112 51129 Di Dio, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-530 46975 Di Gabriele, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H32-2944 38112 Di Gilio, Voto, Peduto and Notari, Interim Resolution DH(99)318
H46-3113 51131 Di Maria, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-241 52846 Di Meo Antonio, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-240 52813 Di Meo and Masotta, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-3114 51099 Di Meo Franca, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-242 51092 Di Mezza, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-2945 43011 Di Niro, judgment of 27/07/00, final on 27/10/00
H32-2946 23243 Di Paola, Interim Resolution DH(96)242
H46-3115 51157 Di Resta, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-2947 40616 Di Santo, Interim Resolution DH(99)654
H46-2948 44414 Di Sisto, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H46-3116 51143 Donato Pepe, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-2949 28743 D'Onofrio Gelsomina, Interim Resolution DH(97)263
H32-2950 39153 Dottorini, Interim Resolution DH(99)520
H46-2951 48404 Dragonetti, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02
H32-2952 32292 E.Z., Interim Resolution DH(98)42
H46-2953 48420 Efisio Pisano, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02
H32-2954 37184 Esposito Loredana, Interim Resolution DH(99)215
H46-3117 51119 Esposito Lucia, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-533 46978 F.P., judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H32-2955 35269 F.V. II, Interim Resolution DH(98)450
H32-2956 33157 Falbo, Interim Resolution DH(98)126
H32-2957 27990 Falco, Interim Resolution DH(97)165
H46-3118 51145 Falluto, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-3119 51121 Falzarano Pasquale, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-243 51156 Fasulo, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02, rectified on 12/09/2002
H46-244 51091 Ferrara Clementina, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/2002
H46-3120 51128 Ferrara Serafina, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-2958 25220 Ferrari Giampiero, Interim Resolution DH(96)212
H46-2959 33440 Ferrari Marcella I, judgment of 28/07/99
H46-3121 51144 Fiorenza Carmine, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-3122 51142 Formato, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-2960 40613 Formichella, Interim Resolution DH(99)655
H46-2961 45897 Forte, judgment of 07/11/00, final on 07/02/01
H46-536 45855 Fr.C., judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01
H46-245 52843 Franco and Basile, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-2962 36619 Franklin, Interim Resolution DH(99)216
H46-741 52924 Frattini and others, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02, revised judgment
of 26/11/2002, final on 26/02/2003[118]
H32-2963 33150 G. D. I, Interim Resolution DH(98)451
H32-2964 24826 G.B. I, Interim Resolution DH(96)59
H32-2965 39163 G.B. III, Interim Resolution DH(99)521
H32-2966 24779 G.B.S., Interim Resolution DH(96)60
H32-2967 30093 G.D.Z., Interim Resolution DH(97)552
H32-2968 28744 Gagliarde, Interim Resolution DH(97)267
H46-246 51161 Gagliardi, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-2969 51103 Gattone and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02, revised judgment of
03/10/02, final on 03/01/03[119]
H46-3123 51135 Gaudino Palma, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-2970 37176+ Gazzo, Rossini, Poli, Dal Forno and Ferro, Interim Resolution DH(99)217
H46-3124 47186 Gentile Agostino, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-540 37170 Giampietro, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H32-2971 28749 Giannini, Interim Resolution DH(97)268
H46-247 52830 Giannotta and Iannella, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-2972 39905 Gilio Antonia, Interim Resolution DH(99)656
H46-3125 51148 Gisondi, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-2973 48407 Giuseppina Romano, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02
H32-2974 34850 Grassi, Interim Resolution DH(98)356
H46-3126 51159 Grasso Alfonsina, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-2975 26807 Grosso, Interim Resolution DH(96)243
H46-545 39124 Guagenti, judgment of 15/02/00, final on 15/02/00
H46-248 51094 Iacobucci and Lavorgna, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-2976 38144 Iammarino, Interim Resolution DH(99)319
H46-3127 51153 Iannotta Antonietta, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-2977 24806 Iaria, Interim Resolution DH(96)61
H46-3128 51102 Iesce and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-2978 39890 Iescone, Interim Resolution DH(99)657
H32-2979 39145 Incarbone, Interim Resolution DH(99)522
H32-2980 27981 Iudica, Interim Resolution DH(97)162
H46-3129 51120 Izzo Antonio, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-2981 39889 Izzo Domenico, Interim Resolution DH(99)658
H46-249 51170 Izzo Giovanni, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-2982 24694 L.C. I, Interim Resolution DH(96)517
H32-2983 26442 La Bella, Interim Resolution DH(96)560
H46-3130 51021 La Torella, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-250 52802 Lagozzino, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-2984 28737 Lamberti, Interim Resolution DH(97)269
H32-2985 36639 Lapolla, Interim Resolution DH(99)218
H46-251 52812 Lavorgna and Iorio, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-2986 38103 Lentini, Interim Resolution DH(99)320
H32-2987 38512 Leonessa, Interim Resolution DH(99)417
H32-2988 37182 Leonetti, Interim Resolution DH(99)219
H32-2989 40592 Liberato, Interim Resolution DH(99)659
H32-2990 32291 Lilli, Interim Resolution DH(98)43
H46-3131 51140 Lombardi Emma, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-3132 51100 Lombardi Gaetana, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-2991 26009 Lombardo Sestilio, Interim Resolution DH(96)518
H32-2992 28762+ Longo, D'Occhio and Bruno, Interim Resolution DH(97)270
H46-2993 48405 Lucio Mario Catillo, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02
H32-2994 27446 M. D.C. I, Interim Resolution DH(97)81
H46-252 52822 Macolino, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-2995 29166 Maiale, Interim Resolution DH(97)330
H46-253 52819 Mancino, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-2996 36644 Maniglio, Interim Resolution DH(99)220
H32-2997 35936 Marasco, Interim Resolution DH(99)321
H32-2998 35947 Marchese Giuseppina, Interim Resolution DH(99)96
H32-2999 27202+ Marino Ettore and others, Interim Resolution DH(97)82
H46-254 51169 Marotta Alberto, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-3133 51138 Marotta Arturo, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-556 37160 Marsicovetere, Interim Resolution DH(99)221
H32-3000 38117 Marsili, Interim Resolution DH(99)322
H46-255 51168 Martino Alfonso, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-3001 29123 Mascia, Interim Resolution DH(97)553
H32-3002 28750 Massimo, Interim Resolution DH(97)271
H32-3003 40608 Mastrantone, Interim Resolution DH(99)660
H46-256 52827 Mastrocinque Mafalda, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-3004 29649 Mastronunzio, Interim Resolution DH(97)419
H46-257 51167 Matera Tommasina, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-3005 42993 Mattiello, judgment of 27/07/00, final on 27/10/00
H46-3134 51101 Maturo and Vegliante, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-3006 28758 Maturo, Interim Resolution DH(97)272
H46-3007 49322 Mazzacchera, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02
H46-258 52845 Mazzarelli, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-3008 28760 Mazzilli, Interim Resolution DH(97)273
H46-3135 51130 Mazzone and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-3136 51158 Meccariello, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-3009 30098 Mecozzi, Interim Resolution DH(97)421
H46-3137 51118 Melillo, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-740 51677 Meneghini, judgment of 11/12/2001, final on 11/03/2002
H32-3010 28752 Mennillo, Interim Resolution DH(97)274
H46-259 52818 Meola, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-3011 40594 Mideo, Interim Resolution DH(99)661
H32-3012 33164 Minieri, Interim Resolution DH(98)357
H46-3138 51133 Moffa, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-260 52840 Mongillo Mario, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-3013 39887 Montano, Interim Resolution DH(99)662
H32-3014 38518 Morzillo, Interim Resolution DH(99)418
H32-3015 30596 Mostacciulo, Interim Resolution DH(97)549
H32-3016 32301 Mostacciuolo, Interim Resolution DH(98)44
H32-3017 26003 Napoli Elio, Interim Resolution DH(96)664
H32-3018 31348 Napoli, Interim Resolution DH(98)55
H46-3019 44415 Napolitano, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H46-261 44428 Nardone Antonio, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46-3020 51123 Natalina de Rosa, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-3139 51136 Nazzaro, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-262 52832 Nero and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-3021 21438 Nicoletti, Interim Resolution DH(96)111
H32-3022 27191 O.F.T., Interim Resolution DH(97)83
H46-263 51029 Ocone, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-3023 39886 Olgato, Interim Resolution DH(99)663
H32-3024 38522 Orsillo, Interim Resolution DH(99)419
H46-3025 40966 P., judgment of 14/12/99, final on 14/03/00
H32-3026 27193 P.V.G., Interim Resolution DH(97)84
H46-3140 51105 Pacifico, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-264 51114 Paduano, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-3027 28756 Pagnano, Interim Resolution DH(97)275
H46-265 52829 Pallotta, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-3028 28732 Palma, Interim Resolution DH(97)276
H46-266 51023 Palmieri Maddalena, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02, revised judgment
of 18/04/02, final on 18/07/02
H46-267 51022 Palmieri Mario Francesco, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-268 52841 Panza, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-3029 29152 Paolini, Interim Resolution DH(97)327
H32-3030 36650 Papa Saletta, Interim Resolution DH(99)222
H32-3031 36630 Pappalardo, Interim Resolution DH(99)223
H32-3032 38143 Paradiso Marilena, Interim Resolution DH(99)323
H32-3033 40611 Parente, Interim Resolution DH(99)664
H46-270 52842 Pascale Elda, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-269 52837 Pascale and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-271 52826 Pascale Maria Annunziata, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-3034 28740 Pasquariello, Interim Resolution DH(97)277
H46-3035 44444 Pastore, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H32-3036 32277 Patrizi II, Interim Resolution DH(98)045
H46-3141 51111 Patuto Salvatore, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-3142 51113 Pelosi Concetta, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-272 51162 Pengue, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-273 52808 Perna Giuseppina, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-3037 26856 Persia, Interim Resolution DH(96)665
H32-3038 40610 Pesce Agnese, Interim Resolution DH(99)665
H32-3039 37174 Pesce Giuseppa, Interim Resolution DH(99)224
H46-274 52828 Petrillo and Petrucci, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-275 51025 Petrillo Gino, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-3040 36649 Petrillo, Interim Resolution DH(99)225
H32-3041 34262 Petrone, Interim Resolution DH(98)262
H46-3042 44529 Pezzuto, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02
H32-3043 35946 Piazza, Interim Resolution DH(99)097
H46-3044 46509 Picconi, judgment of 21/11/00, final on 04/04/01
H32-3045 34837 Piconi, Interim Resolution DH(98)326
H32-3046 28761 Piesco, Interim Resolution DH(97)278
H46-3143 51139 Pilla Addolorata, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-3047 28759 Pilla Michele, Interim Resolution DH(97)279
H46-276 51024 Porto, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-3048 34279 Pristerà, Interim Resolution DH(98)263
H32-3049 40622 Proietti Giuseppe, Interim Resolution DH(99)666
H32-3050 32293 Prologo, Interim Resolution DH(98)46
H46-277 52825 Pucella and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-3051 17292 R.d.R.
H32-3052 26045 R.M. III, Interim Resolution DH(96)519
H32-3053 26429 R.S. III, Interim Resolution DH(96)562
H46-278 51126 Raccio Emilia, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-3054 28722 Radicioni, Interim Resolution DH(97)280
H32-3055 40615 Ranaldo Pellegrino, Interim Resolution DH(99)667
H32-3056 33149 Regino, Interim Resolution DH(98)187
H46-3057 48409 Reino, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02
H46-279 51109 Restuccio, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-3144 51095 Riccardi Lucia, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-280 52820 Riccardi Vicenzina, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-3145 51096 Riccio and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-3146 51108 Rinaldi Giovanni, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-3058 28753 Rinaldi Giuseppe, Interim Resolution DH(97)281
H46-569 46974 Risola, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-281 52823 Romano and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-282 52844 Romano Rosa, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-3059 38113 Rotondi II, judgment of 27/04/00, final on 27/07/00
H46-3147 51151 Ruggiero, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-3060 17336 Rulli
H32-3061 37162 S.C. V, Interim Resolution DH(99)226
H32-3062 34246 Sabio, Interim Resolution DH(98)264
H32-3063 40609 Saccone, Interim Resolution DH(99)668
H46-283 52833 Santagata, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-284 51165 Santina Pelosi, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-3064 28751 Sanzari, Interim Resolution DH(97)282
H32-3065 38131 Sarli, Interim Resolution DH(99)324
H32-3066 28754 Sauchella, Interim Resolution DH(97)283
H32-3067 29165 Savoia II, Interim Resolution DH(97)328
H46-3068 51090 Scaccianemici, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02, revised judgment of
03/10/02, final on 03/01/03[120]
H32-3069 30107 Scagnoli, Interim Resolution DH(97)550
H46-3070 44389 Scarfone, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H46-3071 52982 Sciacchitano and Lo Sciuto, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H32-3072 31638 Sciarra, Interim Resolution DH(97)657
H46-285 40151 Sciarrotta, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H32-3073 24784 Scognamiglio I, Interim Resolution DH(96)117
H32-3074 34255 Sellan, Interim Resolution DH(98)265
H32-3075 28746 Serena and De Filippo, Interim Resolution DH(97)284
H46-3076 52917 Serino Antonella, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H32-3077 28738 Simeone, Interim Resolution DH(97)285
H46-3078 52831 Simone and Pontillo, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02, revised judgment of
03/10/02, final on 03/01/03[121]
H32-3079 27454 Società Italiana Cauzioni S.p.a., Interim Resolution DH(97)85
H32-3080 30595 Soriano, Interim Resolution DH(97)551
H46-3148 51115 Spagnoletti, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-3081 40607 Sperandeo, Interim Resolution DH(99)669
H32-3082 34865+ Spiezio and Di Furia, Interim Resolution DH(98)358
H46-3083 48406 Stefanucci, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02
H32-3084 33162 Stile, Interim Resolution DH(98)127
H46-286 52839 Tanzillo, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-3085 51122 Tarantino, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-3086 40591 Tascione, Interim Resolution DH(99)670
H46-287 52836 Tazza and Zullo, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-288 52810 Tazza, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-3087 28748 Tedesco Luigi, Interim Resolution DH(97)286
H32-3088 33799 Tesauro, Interim Resolution DH(98)188
H32-3089 39876 Tola, Interim Resolution DH(99)671
H46-3090 52922 Tommaso, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H46-3091 48410 Tozzi, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02
H46-3149 51152 Tretola, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-576 46960 Trimboli, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-289 52809 Truocchio Edmondo, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-290 51166 Truocchio Mario, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-291 51124 Tudisco, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-3092 45108 Tullio D'Angelo, judgment of 12/10/00, final on 12/01/01
H46-3150 51097 Uccellini and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-292 52817 Urbano and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-293 51026 Uzzo, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-3093 27466 V.B. I, Interim Resolution DH(97)086
H32-3094 34871 Venzo, Interim Resolution DH(98)359
H32-3095 39907 Verde, Interim Resolution DH(99)672
H32-3096 33785 Vespucci, Interim Resolution DH(98)189
H32-3097 28755 Vigliotti, Interim Resolution DH(97)287
H46-294 52811 Villari, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H46-3098 44416 Viola, judgments of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02 and du 07/11/02, final on 07/02/03[122]
H32-3099 28757 Viscio, Interim Resolution DH(97)288
H32-3100 33783 Visco and Montuoro I, Interim Resolution DH(98)190
H32-3101 33784 Visco and Montuoro II, Interim Resolution DH(98)191
H46-295 52847 Viscuso, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-3102 27167 Vitale Rosa, Interim Resolution DH(97)87
H46-296 51028 Vitelli, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-3103 27989 Volpe, Interim Resolution DH(97)164
H32-3104 17765 Zaffarana, Interim Resolution DH(96)244
H32-3105 36647 Zampetti, Interim Resolution DH(99)227
H46-3151 51132 Zeolla, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-3106 38517 Zito, Interim Resolution DH(99)420
H46-297 52814 Zoccolillo and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
H32-3107 28735 Zollo, Interim Resolution DH(97)289
H32-3108 27987 Zuccardi Merli, Interim Resolution DH(97)163
H32-3109 29134 Zullino, Interim Resolution DH(97)329
H46-298 52800 Zuotto, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02
- 118 cases before the criminal courts
H32-2432 21807+ A. and A.F. and A.R., Interim Resolution DH(97)176
H32-2433 27141 A.A.Q. II, Interim Resolution DH(98)128
H32-2434 21068 A.M. III, Interim Resolution DH(97)366
H32-2435 23356 A.R. II, Interim Resolution DH(98)47
H32-2436 21873 Achilli, Interim Resolution DH(98)91
H46-2437 35207 Aggiato, judgment of 26/04/01, final on 26/07/01
H32-2438 33454 Albé, Interim Resolution DH(99)421
H32-2439 22873 Arconte I, Interim Resolution DH(98)48
H32-2440 31230 Arconte II, Interim Resolution DH(99)102
H46-2441 44970 Arganese, judgment of 26/04/01, final on 26/07/01
H32-2442 20854 Arichetta, Interim Resolution DH(97)108
H32-2443 24920 Ballestra, Interim Resolution DH(98)268
H46-299 38576 Barattelli Carlo, judgment of 04/07/2002, final on 04/10/2002
H32-2444 27584 Bertelli, Interim Resolution DH(99)325
H46-300 41863 Boldrin Stefano, judgment of 04/07/2002, final on 04/10/2002
H32-2445 24909 Bonomo, Interim Resolution DH(99)228
H32-2446 25541 Bortolussi, Interim Resolution DH(97)554
H32-2447 27540 Brincat Joseph II, Interim Resolution DH(99)103
H46-2448 44976 C.P., judgment of 26/04/01, final on 26/07/01
H46-2449 39997 Cancellieri, judgment of 26/04/01, final on 26/07/01
H32-2450 16752+ Capoccia Vittorio
H46-2451 42600 Carbone Biagio, judgment of 04/07/2002, final on 04/10/2002
H46-301 37249 Casadei Roberto, judgment of 04/07/2002, final on 04/10/2002
H46-582 38878 Ciacci, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H32-2452 27240 Cilione, Interim Resolution DH(99)326
H32-2453 33950 Cola, Interim Resolution DH(99)422
H32-2454 24854 Coser Lauro, Interim Resolution DH(97)292
H46-2455 39714 Davinelli, judgment of 26/04/01, final on 26/07/01
H46-2456 33969 De Blasiis, judgment of 14/12/99, final on 06/04/00
H32-2457 23968 De Santis Roberto, Interim Resolution DH(98)269
H46-302 35991 Del Federico Alberto, judgment of 04/07/2002, final on 04/10/2002
H46-583 42351 Del Giudice, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 06/09/01
H46-2458 41513 Di Donato and 3 others, judgment of 26/04/01, final on 26/07/01
H46-303 42619 Di Vuono Bernardo, judgment of 04/07/2002, final on 04/10/2002
H32-2459 29077 E.M. I, Interim Resolution DH(99)229
H32-2460 16549 Emmanuele V. and G.
H46-2461 40457 F.C., judgment of 26/04/01, final on 26/07/01
H32-2462 35000 F.F., Interim Resolution DH(99)423
H46-584 45267 F.R. and 3 others, judgment of 26/07/01, final on 26/10/01
H32-2463 31009 Fabrizi, Interim Resolution DH(99)327
H46-2464 37263 Falcone Nicolò, judgment of 04/07/2002, final on 04/10/2002
H46-2465 34203 Ferrarin, judgment of 26/04/01, final on 06/09/01
H32-2466 28166 Forte II, Interim Resolution DH(98)49
H32-2467 28591 Frisaldi, Interim Resolution DH(98)270
H32-2468 17043 G. and A.G. and M.C.
H46-585 41603 G.B.Z., L.Z. and S.Z., judgment of 14/12/99, final on 15/02/00
H32-2469 28664 G.C. V, Interim Resolution DH(98)456
H32-2470 28666 G.N. II, Interim Resolution DH(98)50
H32-2471 22120 G.P. III, Interim Resolution DH(97)465
H32-2472 33605 G.P. V, Interim Resolution DH(99)424
H32-2473 35554 G.S. VIII, Interim Resolution DH(99)425
H46-2474 37752 Gelli, judgment of 19/10/99, final on 01/02/00
H32-2475 28594 Ghignoni, Interim Resolution DH(99)104
H46-586 41094 Giannangeli, judgment of 05/07/01, final on 05/10/01
H32-2476 18138 Giner, Interim Resolution DH(95)444
H32-2477 36057 Giunchiglia, Interim Resolution DH(99)426
H46-2478 41275 Guarino Carmela, judgment of 26/04/01, final on 06/09/01
H46-587 32646 Guerresi, judgment of 24/04/01, final on 24/04/01
H46-2479 40458 Ialongo, judgment of 26/04/01, final on 26/07/01
H46-2480 40662 Iarrobino and De Nisco, judgment of 26/04/01, final on 26/07/01
H46-2481 45260 Icolaro, judgment of 26/04/01, final on 26/07/01
H32-2482 28963 Isnardi II, Interim Resolution DH(97)659
H32-2483 23570 L.C. and P.A., Interim Resolution DH(97)464
H32-2484 22870 L.G. I, Interim Resolution DH(97)294
H32-2485 33377 L.Z., Interim Resolution DH(99)328
H46-2486 35742 Ledonne I, judgment of 12/05/99, final on 12/08/99
H46-2487 38414 Ledonne II, judgment of 12/05/99, final on 12/08/99
H32-2488 20543 Lupo, Interim Resolution DH(96)107
H32-2489 29508 M.B. II, Interim Resolution DH(99)329
H32-2490 22901 M.C. II, Interim Resolution DH(97)466
H32-2491 24904 Maggiani, Interim Resolution DH(97)660
H46-2492 41206 Mangascia, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 06/09/01
H46-2493 37702 Marchetti Alessandro III, judgment of 14/12/99, final on 14/03/00
H46-588 41893 Martinez, judgment of 26/07/01, final on 26/10/01
H46-2494 43635 Matera Domenico, judgment of 26/04/01, final on 26/07/01
H46-589 23969 Mattoccia, judgment of 25/07/00
H46-2495 43350 Maurano, judgment of 26/04/01, final on 26/07/01
H32-2496 23306 Milioni Guerriero and Mansueti, Interim Resolution DH(97)661
H32-2497 30605 Mongiardo, Interim Resolution DH(98)457
H32-2498 28167 Moni Mario, Interim Resolution DH(98)51
H32-2499 32045 Morelli, Interim Resolution DH(99)105
H32-2500 28903 Motalli, Interim Resolution DH(97)280
H46-2501 47681 Motta Luciana, judgment of 26/04/01, final on 06/09/01
H46-304 44173 Mucciacciaro Raffaele, judgment of 04/07/2002, final on 04/10/2002
H32-2502 25124+ Nativi, Loriga+, Interim Resolution DH(97)662
H46-308 41424 Nuvoli, judgment of 16/05/2002, final on 16/08/2002
H46-590 44943 Orlandi, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H32-2503 18755 P.B. III, Interim Resolution DH(96)109
H46-2504 45269 P.G.F., judgment of 05/07/01, final on 05/10/01
H46-2505 37507 Palmigiano Natale, judgment of 11/01/00, final on 11/04/00
H46-305 42287 Pascazi Domenico, judgment of 04/07/2002, final on 04/10/2002
H46-591 29898 Patanè, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46-592 30132 Pepe Umberto, judgment of 27/04/00, final on 27/07/00
H32-593 36733 Perilli, Interim Resolution DH(99)427
H32-594 24170 Pesce Mario, Interim Resolution DH(97)468
H32-2506 23310 Poidimani, Interim Resolution DH(97)173
H32-2507 35007 Profeta, Interim Resolution DH(99)428
H32-2508 29881 Puccio, Interim Resolution DH(98)458
H46-306 43915 Rocci Luigi, judgment of 04/07/2002, final on 04/10/2002
H32-2509 29530 Rossi Antonio, Interim Resolution DH(98)459
H46-2510 40693 Rotellini and Barnabei, judgment of 26/04/01, final on 26/07/01
H46-2511 45480 S.G., S.M. and P.C., judgment of 26/04/01, final on 26/07/01
H46-2512 36719 Saccomanno, judgment of 12/05/99, final on 12/08/99
H32-2513 21567 Salerno, Interim Resolution DH(97)174
H46-2514 43536 Schiappacasse, judgment of 26/04/01, final on 26/07/01
H32-2515 32728 Spissu, Interim Resolution DH(99)330
H46-2516 34081 Starace, judgment of 27/04/00, final on 27/07/00
H32-2517 33749 Suraci A. and A., Interim Resolution DH(99)331
H46-2518 45264 Tommaso Palumbo, judgment of 26/04/01, final on 26/07/01
H46-307 42291+ Tumbarello and Titone, judgment of 04/07/2002, final on 04/10/2002
H32-596 26806 U.O. I, Interim Resolution DH(98)52
H32-597 26781 U.O. II,Interim Resolution DH(98)129
H32-598 26782 U.O. III, Interim Resolution DH(98)130
H32-2519 33691 V.B. III, Interim Resolution DH(99)332
H32-2520 28839 Viezzer, Interim Resolution DH(98)271
H46-599 43199 Visintin, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H32-2521 29510 Vocca, Interim Resolution DH(98)460
H32-2522 31461 Zaia, Interim Resolution DH(2000)21
- 4 cases criminal proceedings combined with civil action for damages
H46-600 45856 Bacigalupi, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46-601 45857 Comella and others, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01
H46-309 46970 Contardi, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46-602 45858 Tesconi, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01
827th meeting (DH) – 11 and 12 February 2003
APPENDIX 2
827th MEETING (DH) 11 and 12 February 2003
834th meeting DH (9-10 April 2003)
Preliminary list of items for consideration
——————————————
The draft annotated Agenda and Order of Business will be issued on 28 March 2003.
The classification of the cases in sections is at this stage purely on an indicative basis.
CONTENTS
SECTION 5 - SUPERVISION OF GENERAL MEASURES ALREADY ANNOUNCED
SECTION 6 - CASES AWAITING FOR THE PRESENTATION OF A DRAFT RESOLUTION
c. PREPARATION OF THE NEXT DH MEETING (841st MEETING, 3-4 June 2003)
Additional documents
Addendum General Questions
Addendum 1 - Final Resolutions
Addendum 4 – Cases raising special questions
Addendum Preparation of the next DH meeting (841st meeting, 3-4 June 2003)
At the present Human Rights meeting, the Committee of Ministers, sitting at the level of the Ministers’ Deputies, will supervise the execution of some .. cases in accordance with Article 46, § 2, of the Convention for the protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Supervision is carried out in accordance with the Rules for the application of this Article adopted by the Deputies on 11 January 2001[123]. The Directorate General of Human Rights (Department for the execution of the judgments of the Court) and the Secretariat of the Committee of Ministers provide advice and assistance to the Deputies in the fulfilment of their functions under the Convention. Information and communications relating to the cases should be addressed to these departments.
Below follows a short comparative survey of the meeting (the information on the nature of the cases in the different sections is described after the table):
Meetings |
||||||||||||||
Sections |
841 |
827 |
819 |
810 |
803 |
798 |
792 |
783 |
775 |
764 |
760 |
|||
General Questions |
- |
- |
- |
1689 |
- |
- |
- |
|||||||
1.1 |
8 |
2 |
12 |
0 |
11 |
6 |
3 |
4 |
15 |
4 |
||||
1.2 |
2 |
0 |
6 |
11 |
36 |
26 |
1 |
4 |
1 |
3 |
||||
1.3 |
18 |
4 |
11 |
4 |
8 |
7 |
8 |
3 |
20 |
1 |
||||
1.4 |
44 |
10 |
36 |
25 |
2 |
8 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
3 |
||||
2 |
52 |
108 |
154 |
277 |
142 |
213 |
83 |
115 |
92 |
156 |
||||
3.1.a |
546 |
677 |
638 |
568 |
536 |
418 |
388 |
390 |
314 |
- |
||||
3.1.b |
129 |
110 |
89 |
116 |
70 |
58 |
54 |
41 |
169 |
- |
||||
3.1.c |
39 |
38 |
39 |
36 |
36 |
34 |
36 |
34 |
31 |
- |
||||
3.2 |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
2 |
- |
- |
7 |
0 |
- |
||||
4.1 |
6 |
15 |
17 |
15 |
8 |
5 |
13 |
36 |
15 |
- |
||||
4.2 |
78 |
116 |
112 |
91 |
78 |
82 |
65 |
139 |
52 |
22 |
||||
4.3 |
2174 |
2155 |
5 |
71 |
72 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
1463 |
19 |
||||
5.1 |
25 |
32 |
21 |
13 |
12 |
17 |
18 |
17 |
21 |
32 |
||||
5.2 |
0 |
1 |
- |
0 |
0 |
- |
- |
0 |
0 |
1 |
||||
5.3 |
5 |
11 |
7 |
16 |
3 |
1 |
10 |
7 |
14 |
8 |
||||
5.4 |
0 |
0 |
- |
0 |
0 |
- |
- |
0 |
0 |
- |
||||
6 |
406 |
377 |
318 |
351 |
324 |
317 |
336 |
299 |
173 |
123 |
||||
Total of the cases on the Agenda[124] |
3151 |
3186 |
1456 |
1595 |
1340 |
1196 |
2725 |
1107 |
2373 |
372 |
||||
Total of final resolutions submitted |
72 |
16 |
65 |
40 |
57 |
47 |
29 |
19 |
45 |
11 |
||||
Total of new cases |
52 |
108 |
154 |
277 |
142 |
213 |
83 |
115 |
92 |
156 |
||||
Total of pending cases |
3370 |
3327 |
3276 |
3187 |
2964 |
2958 |
2649 |
2624 |
2531 |
2482 |
||||
SECTION 1 – FINAL RESOLUTIONS
In the cases appearing under this heading the Deputies are invited to adopt draft resolutions putting an end to the supervision of execution carried out pursuant to Article 46§2 of the Convention (or former Articles 32[125] and 54 for cases decided before the entry into force of Protocol N° 11).
In these cases the Court (or the Committee) has either found a violation of the Convention or struck the case out of the list on the basis of undertakings made by the parties (for example in the case of friendly settlements – see Article 39 of the Convention and Rule 44 of the Rules of Court).
In all the cases, the Deputies have provisionally found, with the assistance of the Directorate General of Human Rights, that the required execution measures have been taken. The relevant information for each case has been summarised in a draft final resolution presented in Addendum 1. To facilitate examination, the cases are grouped as follows:
Sub-section 1.1. - Leading cases
In these leading cases the measures adopted aim at preventing new violations of the Convention (legislative or regulatory measures, changes of case-law, mere publication in those states where the Convention and the Court’s judgments are given direct effect, administrative measures or other measures) and/or at redressing adequately the individual situation of the applicant (among the measures which may be relevant mention may be made of reopening of proceedings, striking out a conviction from criminal records, granting a residence permit, etc.)
Sub-section 1.2 – Cases concerning problems already solved
This sub-section comprises cases which do not raise problems as regards the applicant’s individual situation, but which concern general problems which have already been solved in the context of similar earlier cases.
Sub-section 1.3 – Cases not involving general or individual measures
Contains cases which do not raise problems of a general or individual character. In these cases the mere dissemination of the judgment to the authorities directly concerned is considered sufficient.
Sub-section 1.4 – Friendly settlement and problems of a general character
This new sub-section groups friendly settlements relating to complaints concerning general problems already under examination by the Deputies in the context of other leading cases in which violations have been established.
No discussion of cases in Section 1 is envisaged since the examination of the different execution questions has already been carried out by the Deputies in the course of earlier meetings.
SECTION 2 – NEW CASES
Under this heading, the Deputies are called upon to conduct a first examination of the execution of the new final judgments delivered by the Court (Article 44 §§ 1 and 2 of the Convention) finding violations of the Convention. The Deputies also supervise the execution of judgments striking cases out of the Court’s list (friendly settlements, non-pursuit of the application, or a solution to the dispute) and which contain specific undertakings (Article 39 of the Convention and Article 44 of the Rules of Court).
The examination of new cases is in general resumed after the expiry of the 3-month time-limit normally imparted by the Court for the payment of the just satisfaction.
In those cases where all execution measures have already been taken before this first examination, a draft final resolution summarising the relevant information could be submitted for adoption. Such draft resolutions appear in Addendum 2.
Discussion is envisaged mainly for cases which raise questions of individual measures or new general measures.
Dissemination of the judgments to all the authorities involved has been requested in all these cases.
SECTION 3 – JUST SATISFACTION
In these cases the Deputies are called upon to supervise the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court and, where required, of any default interest owed.
The section also presents the last cases in which the Deputies, in accordance with former Article 32§2 of the Convention, are called upon to decide on the question of just satisfaction on the basis of proposals submitted by the former European Commission of Human Rights or by the Committee of Special Advisors set up by Resolutions DH(99)681 and (2000)138 (see also decision 692/4.4 from December 1999).
Sub-section 3.1 – control of payment:
3.1.a: Supervisionof the payment of the capital sum of the just satisfaction as well as, where due, of default interest, in cases where the deadline for payment expired less than 6 months ago.
No discussion is envisaged of cases appearing in sub-section 3.1.a. Delegations are invited to submit written confirmation of payment to the Directorate General of Human Rights (Service for the execution of the judgments).
3.1.b: Supervisionof the payment of the capital sum of the just satisfaction in cases where the deadline for payment expired more than 6 months ago.
3.1.c: Examination of special payment problems (for example the disappearance of the applicant, disputes regarding the exact amount paid as a result of exchange rate problems or administrative fees).
The further examination of the cases in sub-sections 3.1 a - c depends on the information received.
Sub-section 3.2 – Decisions on just satisfaction
The Deputies may be are called upon to take a decision on just satisfaction pursuant to former Article 32. The details of the cases are found either in a table presented under this sub-section, or, if the case is complex, in Addendum 3 II.
The examination of such cases will be resumed after the expiry of the 3 months time-limit set for payment.
SECTION 4 – CASES RAISING SPECIAL QUESTIONS
(individual measures, measures not yet defined or special problems)
The cases which appear under this heading require special attention to the extent that they either raise problems regarding the individual situation of the applicant, or concern problems in respect of which the necessary execution measures have not yet been defined, or raise other special problems (for example on account of the magnitude of the problems raised or delays in the adoption of the necessary execution measures).
Sub-section 4.1 – Supervision of individual measures only
This sub-section groups together cases in which the Deputies will exclusively examine the measures taken or to be taken in order to put an end to the violation found and/or remedy its consequences as far as the applicant’s individual situation is concerned – where the just satisfaction awarded by the Court has not done so.
Sub-section 4.2 - Individual measures and/or general problems
This heading presents both cases involving payment problems combined with general problems and cases in which measures have not yet been defined. For supervision of individual measures, see sub-section 4.1 above; for supervision of payment, subsection 3.1.c and for general measures, section 5 below.
Sub-section 4.3 – Special problems
This title groups together complex cases raising special problems.
Supplementary information relating to the cases under this heading may, where necessary, be found in Addendum 4.
As long as individual measures are outstanding cases are examined at each Human Rights meeting, unless the Deputies decide otherwise. Examination of other issues is decided upon on a case-by-case basis.
SECTION 5 – SUPERVISION OF GENERAL MEASURES ALREADY ANNOUNCED
In these cases the Deputies are called upon to supervise the progress made in adopting measures of a general character defined at the national level and to ensure that these measures are apt to prevent new violations similar to those found by the Court. Cases are grouped together according to the nature of the main reforms envisaged.
In complex cases which require the adoption of several kinds of measures, cases are placed in the sub-section which corresponds to the main measures remaining to be adopted. A case may thus, for example, pass from sub-section 5.1 to sub-section 5.4 if the legislative changes required are rapidly adopted, whereas the implementation of the practical measures required turn out to take more time.
Sub-section 5.1 – Legislative and/or regulatory changes
In the cases in this group, the Deputies are mainly waiting for changes of legislation or of government regulations aiming at preventing new similar violations. Delegations of respondent States will thus furnish information about the content of draft legislation or regulations and on the procedure for their adoption.
Sub-section 5.2 – Changes of courts’ case-law or of administrative practice
This heading presents cases in which the Deputies are waiting for evidence (in the form of copies of judgments or decisions, statistics, etc.) of a change of the domestic courts’ case-law or of administrative practice, where such a change cannot, for one reason or another, be presumed solely on the basis of the publication or dissemination of the judgment (cf. the next sub-section).
Sub-section 5.3 – Publication / dissemination
This title encompasses in particular cases in which a change of court case-law or of administrative practice may be presumed, on the basis of evidence of the direct effect accorded to the Court’s judgments in general, as a result of simply publishing or disseminating the judgment in the case at issue, where necessary in translation into the national language. It may also concern other types of cases presenting a broader interest, such as those which imply important indications regarding the scope of the rights guaranteed by the Convention. In all these cases, the Deputies are normally waiting for details regarding the publication or dissemination carried out.
No discussion is envisaged under sub-section 5.3 and the Deputies are invited to present all relevant information in writing to the Directorate General of Human Rights (Service for the execution of the judgments of the Court).
Sub-section 5.4 – Other measures
This sub-section includes cases which primarily imply other types of general measures, for example practical measures such as the construction of prison facilities, the recruitment of judges, police training, etc.
Where necessary, supplementary information with respect to the cases in this section will be presented in Addendum 5.
Examination of these cases is normally resumed within 6 months’ time.
SECTION 6 – CASES WAITING FOR THE PRESENTATION OF A DRAFT RESOLUTION
In these cases, the draft resolutions (prepared in collaboration with the Delegation concerned in cases raising questions of individual measures or new problems of a general character) putting and end to the examination of the case are not yet available at the time of issuing the annotated agenda and order of business.
If available in time for the meeting, drafts could be distributed separately.
No discussion of these cases is envisaged: examination is in principle be resumed at the next Human Rights meeting.
a. Adoption of the Annotated Agenda and Order of Business
Action
The Deputies are invited to adopt the present annotated agenda and order of business.
b. State of ratification by member States of the European Agreement relating to persons participating in proceedings of the European Court of Human Rights, the Sixth Protocol to the General Agreement on privileges and immunities of the Council of Europe and Protocols No. 12 and No. 13 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
Action
The Deputies are invited to provide information on the state of signature and ratification of these four texts. Tables showing the current state of signature and ratification appear in Addendum General Questions.
c. Preparation of the next meeting (841st (3-4 June 2003)) see page 213
(NO DEBATE ENVISAGED)
(Addendum 1)
Action
The Deputies are invited to adopt the resolutions putting and end to the examination of the following cases as they appear in Addendum 1.
SUB-SECTION 1.1 – LEADING CASES
- 14 cases against France
H32- 24263 Areno
H32- 23438 Elbialy
H32- 22578 G.N. II
H46- 39779+ Gombert and Gochgarian, judgment of 13/02/201, final on 13/05/01
H54- 28213 I.A., judgment of 23/09/98
H32- 18847 J-P.DV
H32- 15091 L.D.
H32- 21911 Lanza
H32- 17831 Morganti
H54- 21802 Muller, judgment of 17/03/97
H46- 38781 P.B., judgment of 01/08/00, final on 01/11/00
H46- 34947 Richet, judgment of 13/02/01, final on 13/05/01
H32- 24245 Touihri
H46- 42211 Zannouti, judgment of 31/07/01, final on 31/10/01
SUB-SECTION 1.2 – CASES CONCERNING PROBLEMS ALREADY SOLVED
No new case
SUB-SECTION 1.3 – CASES NOT INVOLVING GENERAL OR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES
No new case
SUB-SECTION 1.4 – FRIENDLY SETTLEMENTS AND PROBLEMS OF A GENERAL CHARACTER
No new case
Action
The Deputies are invited to hold a first examination, under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the ECHR, of the following new judgments, delivered by the European Court of Human Rights (for further information, see the text of the judgments, http://www.echr.coe.int) on the assumption that judgments which are not yet final will not be referred to the Grand Chamber.
The Deputies are invited to resume consideration of these cases after expiry of the time-limit set for payment or according to the specific character of the cases.
PAYMENT OF JUST SATISFACTION
In all the new cases in which States should pay just satisfaction as ordered by the Court or as agreed in a friendly settlement, the authorities of the respondent State are invited to provide the Secretariat, in writing, with confirmations of payment.
INDIVIDUAL AND/OR GENERAL MEASURES
As regards any other execution measures which may be called for in the light of the conclusions of the Court, the authorities of the respondent State are invited, on a preliminary basis, to provide the Secretariat, in writing, with information on the measures mentioned after each case. The possible necessity to take other measures than those mentioned could nevertheless be addressed at the meeting.
Dissemination of the judgments to all the authorities involved is requested in all cases and delegations are invited to provide the written confirmation of this dissemination.
In all these cases, just satisfaction or sums agreed under a friendly settlement has been awarded to the applicants except in the following case: ...
The Secretariat has indicated the cases for which, in principle, no debate seems to be necessary, by the mention “No debate envisaged”.
The cases for which the final character of the judgment has not yet been confirmed by the Court appear on a grey background.
Section 2
- 3 cases against Austria
H46- 35437 Demir, judgment of 05/11/2002, final on 05/02/2003
H46- 38549 Vostic, judgment of 17/10/2002, final on 17/01/2003
H46- 37295 Yildiz M., G. and Y., judgment of 31/10/2002, final on 31/01/2003
- 11 cases against Belgium
H46- 32576 Wynen, judgment of 05/11/2002, final on 05/02/2003
Cases concerning length of civil proceedings
H46- 50615 Boca, judgment of 15/11/2002, final on 15/02/2003
H46- 49797 De Plaen, judgment of 15/11/2002, final on 15/02/2003
H46- 49522 Dooms and others, judgment of 15/11/2002, final on 15/02/2003
H46- 50566 Kenes, judgment of 15/11/2002, final on 15/02/2003
H46- 49546 Lefebvre, judgment of 15/11/2002, final on 15/02/2003
H46- 49794 Oval S.P.R.L., judgment of 15/11/2002, final on 15/02/2003
H46- 49332 Oren and Shoshan, judgment of 15/11/2002, final on 15/02/2003
H46- 50172 Randaxhe, judgment of 15/11/2002, final on 15/02/2003
H46- 49495 S.A. Sitram, judgment of 15/11/2002, final on 15/02/2003
H46- 49497 Teret, judgment of 15/11/2002, final on 15/02/2003 – Striking-out
- 1 case against Croatia
H46- 45435 Radoš and 4 others, judgment of 07/11/2002, final on 07/02/2003
- 1 case against Cyprus
H46- 44730 Serghides and Christoforou, judgment of 05/11/2002, final on 05/02/2003
- 4 cases against the Czech Republic
H46- 36541 Bucheň, judgment of 26/11/2002, final on 26/02/2003
H46- 36548 Pincová and Pinc, judgment of 05/11/2002, final on 05/02/2003
H46- 47273 Běleš and others, judgment of 12/11/2002, final on 12/02/2003
H46- 46129 Zvolský and Zvolská, judgment of 12/11/2002, final on 12/02/2003
- 1 case against Estonia
H46- 37571 Veeber, No. 1, judgment of 07/11/2002, final on 07/02/2003
- 1 case against Finland
H46- 35999 Pietiläinen, judgment of 05/11/2002, final on 27/01/2003[126]
- 3 cases against France
H46- 43191 Laidin, judgment of 05/11/2002, final on 05/02/2003
H46- 49544 Butel, judgment of 12/11/2002, final on 12/02/2003
H46- 49857 Ottomani, judgment of 15/10/2002, final on 15/01/2003
Section 2
- 2 cases against Germany
H46- 37928 Stambuk, judgment of 17/10/2002, final on 17/01/2003
H46- 45448 Becker, judgment of 16/09/2002, final on 26/12/2002
- 2 cases against Greece
H46- 50776+ Agga n° 2, judgment of 17/10/2002, final on 17/01/2003
H46- 62530 Vitaliotou, judgment of 30/01/2003 - Friendly settlement
- 20 cases against Italy
H46- 34896 Craxi Benedetto II, judgment of 05/12/2002, final on 05/03/2003
- Cases concerning the failure to enforce judicial eviction orders against tenants
H46- 34819 Cau, judgment of 15/11/2002, final on 15/02/2003
H46- 30879 Ciliberti Raffaele, judgment of 15/11/2002, final on 15/02/2003
H46- 32589 D.V. II, judgment of 15/11/2002, final on 15/02/2003
H46- 32577 Folli Carè, judgment of 15/11/2002, final on 15/02/2003
H46- 32006 Gnecchi and Barigazzi, judgment of 15/11/2002, final on 15/02/2003
H46- 32392 L. and P., judgment of 15/11/2002, final on 15/02/2003
H46- 32542 L.B. III, judgment of 15/11/2002, final on 15/02/2003
H46- 31548 Maltoni, judgment of 15/11/2002, final on 15/02/2003
H46- 31129 Merico, judgment of 15/11/2002, final on 15/02/2003
H46- 30530 Rossi Luciano, judgment of 15/11/2002, final on 15/02/2003
H46- 31223 T.C.U., judgment of 15/11/2002, final on 15/02/2003
H46- 33252 Tona, judgment of 15/11/2002, final on 15/02/2003
H46- 33204 Tosi, judgment of 15/11/2002, final on 15/02/2003
H46- 30972 V.T., judgment of 15/11/2002, final on 15/02/2003
H46- 35997 Candela, judgment of 30/01/2003 - Friendly settlement
H46- 37888 Cecchi Ida, judgment of 09/01/2003 - Friendly settlement
H46- 34435 Di Tullio, judgment of 09/01/2003 - Friendly settlement
- Cases concerning length of criminal proceedings
H46- 43621 F.M., judgment of 28/11/2002, final on 28/02/2003
H46- 45789 Pugliese Massimo, judgment of 28/11/2002, final on 28/02/2003
- 1 case against Latvia
H46- 58442 Lavents, judgment of 28/11/2002, final on 28/02/2003
- 7 cases against Poland
H46- 30218 Nowicka, judgment of 03/12/2002, final on 03/03/2003
H46- 26761 Płoski, judgment of 12/11/2002, final on 12/02/2003
H46- 29537+ Radaj, judgment of 28/11/2002, final on 28/02/2003
H46- 37443 Lisiak, judgment of 05/11/2002, final on 05/02/2003
Cases concerning length of civil proceedings[127]
H46- 40330 Piechota, judgment of 05/11/2002, final on 05/02/2003
H46- 37645 Sawicka, judgment of 01/10/2002, final on 01/01/2003
H46- 65660 W.Z., judgment of 24/10/2002, final on 24/01/2003
Section 2
- 4 cases against Portugal
H46- 38830 Czekalla, judgment of 10/10/2002, final on 10/01/2003
H46- 48956 Gil Leal Pereira, judgment of 31/10/2002, final on 31/01/2003
Cases concerning length of civil proceedings
H46- 49671 Ferreira da Nave, judgment of 07/11/2002, final on 07/02/2003
H46- 49279 Koncept-Conselho em Comunicação e Sensibilização de Públicos, Lda, judgment of 31/10/2002, final on 31/01/2003
- 7 cases against Romania
H46- 33627 Baragan, judgment of 01/10/2002, rectified on 05/11/2002, final on 05/02/2003
H46- 32926 Canciovici and others, judgment of 26/11/2002, final on 26/02/2003
H46- 29769 Curutiu A. and M., judgment of 22/10/2002, final on 22/01/2003
H46- 32936 Dragnescu, judgment of 26/11/2002, final on 26/02/2003
H46- 32977 Gavrus, judgment of 26/11/2002, final on 26/02/2003
H46- 30698 Mateescu and others, judgment of 22/10/2002, final on 22/01/2003
H46- 32268 Nagy, judgment of 26/11/2002, final on 26/02/2003
- 3 cases against the Slovak Republic
Cases concerning length of civil proceedings
H46- 47804 Havala, judgment of 12/11/2002, final on 12/02/2003
H46- 39752 Matouškova, judgment of 12/11/2002, final on 12/02/2003
H46- 41783 Polovka, judgment of 21/01/2003 - Friendly settlement
- 2 cases against Sweden
H46- 38629 Lundevall, judgment of 12/11/2002, final on 12/02/2003
H46- 38978 Salomonsson, judgment of 12/11/2002, final on 12/02/2003
- 1 case against Switzerland
H46- 41202 Müller, judgment of 05/11/2002, final on 05/02/2003
- 13 cases against Turkey
H46- 42739 Özel Yaşar, judgment of 07/11/2002, final on 07/02/2003
H46- 25756 Dalkılıç, judgment of 05/12/2002, final on 05/03/2003
H46- 31877 Gündoğan Halil, judgment of 10/10/2002, final on 10/01/2003
H46- 24737+ Satık, Camlı, Satık and Maraşlı, judgment of 22/10/2002, final on 22/01/2003
H46- 32574 Algür, judgment of 22/10/2002, final on 22/01/2003
H46- 25141 Dicle pour le Parti de la Démocratie (DEP), judgment of 10/12/2002, final on 10/03/2003
H46- 29864 H.K. and others, judgment of 14/01/2003 - Friendly settlement
H46- 28002 Tamer, judgment of 09/01/2003 - Friendly settlement
- Freedom of expression cases
H46- 28493 Küçük, judgment of 05/12/2002, final on 05/03/2003
H46- 24914 Öztürk Ayşe, judgment of 15/10/2002, final on 15/01/2003
H46- 27692+ Karakoç and others, judgment of 15/10/2002, final on 15/01/2003
Section 2
- Cases relating to delays by the administration in paying additional compensation for expropriation and the applicable rate of default interest
H46- 20139 Çelebi Mehmet No. 2, judgment of 10/10/2002, final on 10/01/2003
H46- 20143 İnce Fehmiye, judgment of 10/10/2002, final on 10/01/2003
- 14 cases against the United Kingdom
H46- 33218 E. and others, judgment of 26/11/2002, final on 10/01/2003[128]
H46- 53236 Waite, judgment of 10/12/2002, final on 10/03/2003
H46- 28212 Benjamin and Wilson, judgment of 26/09/2002, final on 26/12/002
H46- 44652 Beckles, judgment of 10/10/2002, final on 10/01/2003
H46- 32771 Cuscani, judgment of 24/09/2002, final on 24/12/2002
H46- 48539 Allan, judgment of 05/11/2002, final on 05/02/2003
H46- 39393 M.G., judgment of 24/09/2002, final on 24/12/2002
H46- 47114 Taylor-Sabori, judgment of 22/10/2002, final on 22/01/2003
H46- 38719 D.P. and J.C., judgment of 10/10/2002, final on 10/01/2003
H46- 48535+ Beck, Copp and Bazelay, judgment of 22/10/2002, final on 22/01/2003
H46- 43208+ Perkins and R., judgment of 22/10/2002, final on 22/01/2003
H46- 42116 Somjee, judgment of 15/10/2002, final on 15/01/2003
H46- 39197 Foley, judgment of 22/10/2002, final on 22/01/2003
H46- 49771 Jordan Stephen No. 3, judgment of 10/12/2002, final on 10/03/2003
Action
The Deputies are invited to supervise the payment of just satisfaction in the following cases pending before the Committee of Ministers for execution supervision. The Deputies are invited to resume consideration of these cases in principle at their next Human Rights meeting.
3.a SUPERVISION OF THE PAYMENT OF THE CAPITAL SUM OF THE JUST SATISFACTION AS WELL AS, WHERE DUE, OF DEFAULT INTEREST, IN CASES WHERE THE DEADLINE FOR PAYMENT EXPIRED LESS THAN 6 MONTHS AGO
At the time of issuing the present Annotated Agenda and Order of Business, the Secretariat had not received the written confirmation of payment of just satisfaction and/or default interest in the following cases (see the table below summarising the total number of cases by States). The Representatives of the States concerned are invited to give the Secretariat written confirmation of payment of the sums awarded by the Court and/or the default interests (no debate envisaged during the meeting).
- 3 cases against Austria
H46- 37093 Informationsverein Lentia II, judgment of 28/11/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46- 34994 Walter, judgment of 28/11/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46- 38275 W.F., judgment of 30/05/2002, final on 30/08/2002
- 2 cases against Belgium
- Just satisfaction to be paid
H46- 37370 Stratégies and Communications and Dumoulin, judgment of 15/07/2002, final on 15/10/2002[129]
- Default interest to be paid
H46- 51564 Čonka, judgment of 05/02/02, final on 05/05/02[130]
- 2 cases against Croatia
H46- 62912 Benzan, judgment of 08/11/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46- 56773 Rajčević, judgment of 23/07/2002, final on 06/11/2002[131]
- 36 cases against France
- Just satisfaction to be paid
H46- 38748 Immeubles Groupe Kosser, judgment of 21/03/2002, final on 21/06/2002[132]
H46- 54210 Papon, judgment of 25/07/2002, final on 25/10/2002[133]
H46- 42400 Seguin, judgment of 16/04/2002, final on 06/11/2002[134]
H46- 51279 Colombani and others, judgment of 25/06/2002, final on 25/09/2002
H46- 48161 Motais de Narbonne, judgment of 02/07/2002, final on 02/10/2002
H46- 32911+ Meftah, Adoud and Bosoni, judgment of 26/07/2002 - Grand Chamber
H46- 37971 Sociétés Colas Est, judgment of 16/04/2002, final on 16/07/2002
H46- 41376 D.M., judgment of 27/06/2002, final on 27/09/2002
H46- 43125 Delbec Annick No. 3, judgment of 18/06/2002, final on 18/09/2002[135]
H46- 33395 L.R., judgment of 27/06/2002, final on 27/09/2002
Section 3.a
H46- 38396 Karatas and Sari, judgment of 16/05/2002, final on 16/08/2002
H46- 33424 Nouhaud and others, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002
H46- 51575 Baillard, judgment of 26/03/2002, final on 04/09/2002[136]
H46- 41358 Desmots, judgment of 02/07/2002, final on 06/11/2002[137]
H46- 51179 Solana, judgment of 19/03/02, final on 04/09/2002[138]
H46- 45172 Fentati, judgment of 22/10/2002 - Friendly settlement
- Default interest to be paid
H46- 33592 Baumann, judgment of 22/05/01, final on 22/08/01
H46- 41476 Laine, judgment of 17/01/02, final on 17/04/02
H46- 40096 Versini, judgment of 10/07/01, final on 10/10/01
H46- 41526 Pulvirenti, judgment of 28/11/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 44211 Lacombe, judgment of 07/11/00, final on 07/02/01
H46- 39273 Vermeersch, judgment of 22/05/01, final on 22/08/01
H46- 48167 Hababou, judgment of 26/04/01 - Friendly settlement
H32- 39966 De Cantelar, Interim Resolution DH(2000)86
H46- 42195 Mortier, judgment of 31/07/01, final on 31/10/01
H46- 39594 Kress, judgment of 07/06/01 – Grand Chamber[139]
H46- 40472 Tricard, judgment of 10/07/01, final on 10/10/01
H46- 29731 Krombach, judgment of 13/02/01, final on 13/05/01
H46- 47631 Lemort, judgment of 26/04/01, final on 26/04/01
H32- 31677 Watson John, Interim Resolution DH(2000)20
H46- 44070 Beljanski, judgment of 07/02/02, final on 07/05/02
H46- 44069 G.B. II, judgment of 02/10/01, final on 02/01/02
H46- 53613 Goth, judgment of 16/05/2002, final on 16/08/2002
H46- 33023 Meier, judgment of 07/02/02 – Friendly settlement
H46- 35683 Vaudelle, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 06/09/01
H46- 37794 Pannullo and Forte, judgment of 30/10/01, final on 30/01/02
- 10 cases against Greece
- Just satisfaction to be paid
H46- 37095 Pialopoulos and others, judgments of 15/02/01, final on 27/06/02 and of 15/05/01, final on 06/11/02[140] (Article 41)
- Default interest to be paid
H46- 47730 Entreprises Meton and Etep, judgment of 21/03/2002, final on 21/06/2002
H46- 48392 Hatzitakis, judgment of 11/04/2002, final on 11/07/2002
H46- 48679 AEPI S.A., judgment of 11/04/2002, final on 11/07/2002
H46- 46356 Smokovitis and others, judgment of 11/04/2002, final on 11/07/2002
H46- 49215 Angelopoulos, judgment of 11/04/2002, final on 11/07/2002
H46- 46806 Sakellaropoulos Yeoryios, judgment of 11/04/2002, final on 11/07/2002
H46- 46352 Logothetis, judgment of 12/04/01, final on 12/07/01 and judgment of 18/04/02 (Article 41), final on 18/07/02
H46- 49282 Marinakos, judgment of 04/10/01 – Friendly settlement
H46- 47020 Kolokitha, judgment of 07/06/01 - Friendly settlement
Section 3.a
- 2 cases against Hungary
H46- 42373 Bódine Bencze, judgment of 01/10/2002 – Striking-out following a friendly settlement
H46- 43352 Kósa, judgment of 01/10/2002 – Striking-out following a friendly settlement
- 1 case against Ireland
H46- 39474 D.G., judgment of 16/05/02, final on 16/08/02[141]
- 328 cases against Italy
- Just satisfaction to be paid
H46- 57574+ Sulejmanovic and others and Sejdovic and Sulejmanovic, judgment of 08/11/2002 - Friendly settlement[142]
H46- 36534 Osu, judgment of 11/07/2002, final on 11/10/2002
H46- 36732 Pisano, judgment of 24/10/2002 - Striking-out - Grand Chamber
- Cases concerning the failure to enforce judicial eviction orders against tenants
H46- 28724 Capitanio, judgment of 11/07/2002, final on 11/10/2002
H46- 34742 A.M.M., judgment of 28/11/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46- 46079 Biffoni, judgment of 24/10/2001 - Friendly settlement
H46- 36112 C. Srl, judgment of 07/11/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46- 41624 Calvagno, judgment of 03/10/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46- 38043 Ciccone, judgment of 07/11/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46- 31928 F. and F., judgment of 24/10/2001 - Friendly settlement
H46- 33115 Fabbrini, judgment of 15/11/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46- 39451 Fiorentini Vizzini, judgment of 19/12/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46- 35001 Franceschetti, judgment of 07/11/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46- 39690 Gianotti Ricardo, judgment of 03/10/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43986 Pugliese Rosalba, judgment of 03/10/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46- 47895 Sartorelli, judgment of 24/10/2001 - Friendly settlement
H46- 34714 Tacchino and Scorza, judgment of 18/07/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46- 57206 Virgulti, judgment of 28/11/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46- 36734 Visca, judgment of 07/11/2002 - Friendly settlement
- Civil courts
H46- 56084 At.M., judgment of 07/05/02, final on 07/08/02
H46- 44409 Rizzo Giuseppe, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02, rectified on 09/07/02
H32- 30423 Salini Costruttori Spa, Interim Resolution DH(99)673
- Administrative courts[143]
H46- 44341 Cannone, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002
H46- 44347 Carapella and others, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002
H46- 44350 Cecere Domenico, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002
H46- 44337 Delli Paoli, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002
H46- 44349 Fragnito, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002
H46- 44340 Gaudenzi, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002
H46- 38594 Mereu and S. Maria Navarrese, judgment of 13/06/2002, final on 13/09/2002
H46- 44348 Nazzaro and others, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002
H46- 44351 Pace and others, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002
Section 3.a
- Labour courts
H46- 51156 Fasulo, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02, rectified on 12/09/2002
H46- 51023 Palmieri Maddalena, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02, revised jugement of 18/04/02, final on 18/07/02
- Criminal proceedings
H46- 38576 Barattelli Carlo, judgment of 04/07/2002, final on 04/10/2002
H46- 41863 Boldrin Stefano, judgment of 04/07/2002, final on 04/10/2002
H46- 37249 Casadei Roberto, judgment of 04/07/2002, final on 04/10/2002
H46- 35991 Del Federico Alberto, judgment of 04/07/2002, final on 04/10/2002
H46- 42619 Di Vuono Bernardo, judgment of 04/07/2002, final on 04/10/2002
H46- 44173 Mucciacciaro Raffaele, judgment of 04/07/2002, final on 04/10/2002
H46- 42287 Pascazi Domenico, judgment of 04/07/2002, final on 04/10/2002
H46- 43915 Rocci Luigi, judgment of 04/07/2002, final on 04/10/2002
H46- 42291+ Tumbarello and Titone, judgment of 04/07/2002, final on 04/10/2002
H46- 41424 Nuvoli, judgment of 16/05/2002, final on 16/08/2002
- Default interest to be paid
H46- 25639 F.L., judgment of 20/12/01, final on 20/03/02
H46- 39676 Rojas Morales, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46- 26772 Labita, judgment of 06/04/00, final on 06/04/00
H46- 30882 Pellegrini Maria Grazia, judgment of 20/07/01, final on 20/10/01
H46- 15918 Antonetto, judgment of 20/07/00, final on 20/10/00
H46- 28168 Quadrelli, judgment of 11/01/00, final on 20/03/00
H46- 33354 Lucà, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46- 26161 Natoli, judgment of 09/01/01, Interim Resolution ResDH(2001)178
H32- 19734 F.S. I, Interim Resolution DH(98)209
H46- 41852 Vaccaro, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46- 39221+ Scozzari and others, judgment of 13/07/00 – Grand Chamber
Interim Resolutions ResDH(2001)65 and ResDH(2001)151
H46- 31143 Indelicato, judgment of 18/10/01, final on 18/01/02[144]
- Civil courts
H46- 44481 A.C. VII, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46- 46515 Adriani, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46- 46964 Alpites S.P.A., judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46- 47785 Angemi, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46- 48412 Ar.M., judgment of 23/10/01, final on 23/01/02
H46- 46958 Ardemagni and Ripa, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H32- 39900 Artuso Paolo, Interim Resolution DH(99)569
H32- 39137 Avallone, Interim Resolution DH(99)475
H46- 44511 Bellagamba, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46- 40977 Beltramo, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01
H46- 44431 Beluzzi and others, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46- 39883 Bertozzi, judgment of 27/04/00, final on 27/04/00
H46- 44442 Bevilacqua, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46- 36811 Bielectric S.R.L., judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46- 44437 Bocca, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H32- 39121 Bolla, Interim Resolution DH(99)480
H46- 44457 Bonelli, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46- 44436 Buffalo s.r.l., judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
Section 3.a
H46- 46534 Burghesu, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46- 46980 C.L., judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H32- 35292 Calandrella F., P. and 2 others, Interim Resolution DH(98)405
H46- 39881 Capodanno, judgment of 05/04/00, final on 05/04/00
H46- 45071 Capurro and Tosetti, judgment of 28/04/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 46526 Carboni, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46- 45859 Caruso Giuseppina, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01
H46- 45861 Cavallaro, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01
H46- 36620 Ceriello, judgment of 26/10/99, final on 26/10/99
H46- 46537 Cerulli and Zadra, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46- 45869 Chiappetta, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01
H46- 46959 Circo and others, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46- 44504 Citterio and Angiolillo, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46- 47779 Ciuffetti, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46- 46532 Conte Gaspare and others, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46- 40979 Conte Riccardo II, judgment of 05/04/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 47774 Conti Giuliana, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46- 44385 Cornaglia, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46- 46527 Corsi, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46- 35616 Coscia, judgment of 11/04/00, final on 11/04/00
H46- 46538 Costantini Francesco, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46- 44500 Cova, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46- 45880 Cultraro, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46- 46536 D.C. IV, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46- 40954 D’Alessandro, judgment of 05/04/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 44513 D’Ammassa and Frezza, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02, revised on 09/01/03, final on 09/04/03[145]
H46- 45872 D’Annibale, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01
H32- 17482 D'Aquino and Petrizzi, Interim Resolution DH(96)28
H46- 40216 D’Arrigo and Garrozzo, judgment of 21/11/00, final on 21/02/01
H46- 52921 Damiano, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H32- 40566 De Cicco Concetta, Interim Resolution DH(98)405
H32- 40580 De Lorenzi, Interim Resolution DH(99)588
H46- 49372 De Pilla, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H46- 42520 De Simone Pasquale, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H32- 39138 Di Fant I, Interim Resolution DH(99)488
H32- 39139 Di Fant II, Interim Resolution DH(99)489
H46- 44446 Di Girolamo and 6 others, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H46- 46976 Di Motoli and others, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46- 46520 Dorigo Franco, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46- 44480 E.G., judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H46- 44519 E.M. II, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H32- 39906 Emmebiemme S.r.l., Interim Resolution DH(99)592
H46- 40982 Erdokovy, judgment of 01/02/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 46524+ F., T. and E., judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46- 46533 F.L.S., judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46- 39164 F.S.p.A. II, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01
H46- 46971 F.T., judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H32- 26012 Facciolini, Interim Resolution DH(96)648
H46- 46968 Falconi, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46- 52972 Falzarano Carmine, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H46- 47781 Farinosi and Barattelli, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
Section 3.a
H46- 45870 Ferrazzo and others, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01
H46- 45868 Filippello Giorgio II, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01
H32- 38145 Focardi and Conti, Interim Resolution DH(99)287
H46- 46965 Franceschetti and Odorico, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H32- 38118 Fraschetti, Interim Resolution DH(99)288
H46- 44397 G.B. IV, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46- 37131 G.M.N., judgment of 02/11/99, final on 02/11/99
H32- 38503 G.P. and 25 others, Interim Resolution DH(99)388
H46- 46543 G.S. and L.M., judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46- 47786 G.V. V, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46- 46963 Galiè, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46- 46528 Giannalia, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46- 47773 Gianni, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46- 45860 Giuseppe Nicola and Luciano Caruso, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01
H46- 40968 I.F., judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01
H46- 44418 I.P.E.A. S.R.L., judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H46- 39116 I.R., judgment of 15/02/00, final on 15/02/00
H46- 44447 Ianniti and others, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46- 46516 Il Messaggero S.a.s. II, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46- 46517 Il Messaggero S.a.s. III, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46- 46518 Il Messaggero S.a.s. IV, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46- 46519 Il Messaggero S.a.s. V, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46- 47777 Ilardi, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46- 44508 Immobiliare Il Messaggero del geometra Antonio Iorillo, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H46- 46530 Iulio, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46- 40924 L. S.r.l., judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00
H46- 46542 Lanino, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H32- 31341 Lazzari and Scagnoli, Interim Resolution DH(97)637
H46- 45853 Lo Cicero, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01
H32- 40571 Lo Sardo, Interim Resolution DH(99)606
H46- 46523 Lonardi, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46- 46962 Lucas International S.R.L., judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46- 44406 M. S.r.l., judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46- 46961 Maletti, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46- 40978 Mantini, judgment of 05/04/00 - Friendly settlement
H32- 28725 Manzi A., B. and L., Interim Resolution DH(97)254
H46- 40956 Marchetti, judgment of 05/04/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 44443 Marchi, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46- 46957 Marcolongo, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46- 44517 Mari and Mangini, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46- 44422 Marzinotto, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46- 46966 Massaro, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46- 46979 Mastrantonio Francesca, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46- 44420 Mauri, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46- 46973 Morelli and Nerattini, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46- 44490 Murgia, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H32- 39872 Nata, Interim Resolution DH(99)617
H46- 46522 Nolla, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46- 44494 O.P., judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46- 44468 P.B. V, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46- 40570 Padalino V. and G., judgment of 15/02/00, final on 15/02/00
H46- 40952 Paderni II, judgment of 05/04/00 - Friendly settlement
Section 3.a
H32- 21707 Panissa, D., G. and A. Vittonetto
H32- 39155 Perilli and Gigotti Micheli, Interim Resolution DH(99)509
H46- 45070 Persichetti and C.S.r.l., judgment of 27/07/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 44380 Pettirossi, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46- 28936 Piccinini II, judgment of 11/04/00 - Friendly settlement
H32- 39899 Pirilli, Interim Resolution DH(99)623
H46- 45065 Pirola, judgment of 27/07/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 46967 Procaccianti, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46- 46969 Procopio, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46- 44412 Quattrone Pasquale, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H46- 45058 Rettura, judgment of 17/10/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 44465 Rigutto, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46- 43098 Romano, judgment of 28/09/00 - Friendly settlement
H32- 35328 Roselli Italo II, Interim Resolution DH(98)440
H46- 44479 Rosetti e Ciucci and C., judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H46- 44527 Rossana Ferrari, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46- 44472 Rossi Valeria, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46- 44461 Sacchi Roberto, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46- 38135 Sanna, judgment of 11/04/00, final on 11/04/00
H46- 44466 Santoro Valerio, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46- 47780 Santorum, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46- 45854 Savino, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 04/04/01
H46- 44419 Sbrojavacca Pietrobon, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46- 36621 Scalvini, judgment of 26/10/99, final on 26/10/99
H46- 44491 Sonego, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46- 44470 Spada, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46- 56094 Sposito, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H46- 39705 Spurio II, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01
H32- 39865 Staffolani, Interim Resolution DH(99)635
H46- 44417 Tagliabue, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H32- 38102 Talenti, Interim Resolution (2001)58
H46- 44486 Tebaldi, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46- 44425 Tedesco Michele, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46- 46539 Tor Di Valle Costruzioni S.P.A. VII, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46- 45068 Toscano and others, judgment of 27/07/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 44488 Vecchi and others, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46- 44528 Vecchini, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46- 44534 Venturini Alberto I, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H32- 40586 Verini II, Interim Resolution DH(99)639
H46- 40599 Vicari II, judgment of 15/02/00
H46- 44395 Visentin, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46- 37166 Vitale and others, judgment of 02/11/99
H46- 44445 W.I.E. S.n.c., judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46- 44462 Zanasi, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46- 37079 Zironi, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01
- Administrative courts [146]
H46- 41809 A.B. V, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00
H46- 34437 Caliendo, judgment of 14/03/00, final on 14/03/00
H46- 41817 Caliri, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00
H46- 41807 Centioni and others, judgment of 09/01/01 - Friendly settlement
H46- 41815 Monti Enrico, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00
Section 3.a
H46- 41810 Mosca, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00
H46- 41813 Musiani, judgment of 09/01/01 - Friendly settlement
H46- 41816 Paradiso Antonio, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00
H46- 41812 Piccirillo Aldo, judgment of 09/01/01 - Friendly settlement
H46- 31631 Procaccini, judgment of 30/03/00, final on 30/03/00
H46- 41814 Zeoli and 34 others, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 05/10/00
- Court of Audit
H46- 41823 Pascali and Conte, judgment of 05/04/00 - Friendly settlement
H32- 39175 Sileo, Interim Resolution DH(99)524
- Labour courts
H46- 40363 Ascierto Ada, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43063 Bello, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 40975 Bucci, judgment of 05/04/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43094 C.B., judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 42999 Cacciacarro, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43020 Ciaramella Pasquale, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H32- 36615 Cappello, Interim Resolution DH(99)212
H32- 38095 Cardillo, Interim Resolution DH(99)317
H46- 46521 Ciccardi, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46- 42996 Cocca, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 44532 Colacrai, judgment of 23/10/01, final on 12/12/01
H46- 43088 Coppolaro, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43086 Cosimo Cesare, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43087 Cosimo Rotondi, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43083 D’Addona Simone, judgment of 22/06/00 – Friendly settlement
H46- 43017 D’Ambrosio, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43059 D’Antonoli, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 40960 Dattilo, judgment of 05/04/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43054 Del Buono, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43051 Di Biase Leonardo, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43062 Di Blasio Concetta, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 46975 Di Gabriele, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46- 43030 Di Libero, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43022 Di Mella, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 46978 F.P., judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46- 45855 Fr.C., judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01
H46- 43056 Fallarino, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43058 Foschini, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43096 G.A. IV, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43093 G.P. VI, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43075 Gallo Giuseppe, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 37170 Giampietro, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46- 38975 Gioia Angelina, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43050 Gioia Filomena Giovanna, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43074 Grasso, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 39124 Guagenti, judgment of 15/02/00, final on 15/02/00
H46- 43072 Guarino, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43091 Iadarola, judgment of 27/07/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 42998 Iannotta, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43101 Iannotti, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43021 Iapalucci, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43067 Izzo Italia, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
Section 3.a
H46- 43065 Lanni, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43102 Lepore T., Lepore M. and Iannotti T., judgment of 27/07/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43068 Luciano, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43095 M.C. X, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43010 Mannello, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H32- 37160 Marsicovetere, Interim Resolution DH(99)221
H46- 43000 Maselli, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43018 Meoli, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43069 Mercone, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43057 Mongillo, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43064 Nicolella, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43100 Orsini, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43076 P.T. II, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43012 Palumbo, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43052 Panzanella, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43061 Patuto, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43060 Pizzi, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43023 Pozella, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 46974 Risola, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46- 43019 Rubortone, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43055 Sabatino, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43099 Santillo, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43085 Silvio Cesare, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 42997 Squillace, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43084 Tontoli, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 46960 Trimboli, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46- 43016 Truocchio, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43070 Vignona, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43109 Zeoli Nicolina, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43015 Zollo Clavio, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43066 Zullo, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
- Criminal courts
H46- 38878 Ciacci, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46- 42351 Del Giudice, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 06/09/01
H46- 45267 F.R. and 3 others, judgment of 26/07/01, final on 26/10/01
H46- 41603 G.B.Z., L.Z. and S.Z., judgment of 14/12/99, final on 15/02/00
H46- 41094 Giannangeli, judgment of 05/07/01, final on 05/10/01
H46- 32646 Guerresi, judgment of 24/04/01, final on 24/04/01
H46- 41893 Martinez, judgment of 26/07/01, final on 26/10/01
H46- 23969 Mattoccia, judgment of 25/07/00
H46- 44943 Orlandi, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46- 29898 Patanè, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
H46- 30132 Pepe Umberto, judgment of 27/04/00, final on 27/07/00
H32- 36733 Perilli, Interim Resolution DH(99)427
H32- 24170 Pesce Mario, Interim Resolution DH(97)468
H46- 37118 Sergi, judgment of 11/04/00 - Friendly settlement
H32- 26806 U.O. I, Interim Resolution DH(98)52
H32- 26781 U.O. II, Interim Resolution DH(98)129
H32- 26782 U.O. III, Interim Resolution DH(98)130
H46- 43199 Visintin, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01
Section 3.a
- Criminal proceedings combined with civil action for damages
H46- 45856 Bacigalupi, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H46- 45857 Comella and others, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01
H46- 45858 Tesconi, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01
- 1 case against the Netherlands
H46- 34462 Wessels-Bergervoet, judgment of 04/06/2002, final on 04/09/2002 and judgment of 12/11/2002 (Article 41) – Friendly settlement
- 8 cases against Poland
- Just satisfaction to be paid
H46- 34611 Dacewicz, judgment of 02/07/2002, final on 02/10/2002
H46- 33885 Kawka Eryk, judgment of 27/06/2002, final on 27/09/2002
H46- 24244 Migoń, judgment of 25/06/2002, final on 25/09/2002
H46- 27715+ Berliński Roman and Sławomir, judgment of 20/06/2002, final on 20/09/2002
H46- 48684 Uthke, judgment of 18/06/02, défintif le 18/09/02[147]
H46- 55106 Górka, judgment of 05/11/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46- 71891 Hałka and others, judgment of 02/07/2002, final on 02/10/2002[148]
- Default interest to be paid
H32- 24559 Gibas, Interim Resolution DH(97)242[149]
- 9 cases against Portugal
- Just satisfaction to be paid
H46- 54073 Agostinho, judgment of 03/10/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46- 47460 Câmara Pestana, judgment of 16/05/2002, final on 16/08/2002
H46- 54483 Lógica - Móveis de Organização, Lda, judgment of 19/12/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46- 50843+ Longotrans - Transportes Internacionais Lda, judgment of 03/10/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46- 47833 Marques Francisco, judgment of 06/06/2002, final on 06/09/2002
H46- 53793 Morais Sarmento, judgment of 03/10/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46- 48187 Rosa Marques and others, judgment of 25/07/2002, final on 25/10/2002
H46- 54449 Saraiva e Lei, judgment of 03/10/2002 - Friendly settlement
- Default interest to be paid
H46- 43654 Pires, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
Section 3.a
- 11 cases against Romania
- Just satisfaction to be paid
H46- 33358 Oprea and others, judgment of 16/07/2002, final on 16/10/2002[150]
H46- 35831 Bălănescu, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002[151]
H46- 34992 Basacopol, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002[152]
H46- 33912 Budescu and Petrescu, judgment of 02/07/2002, final on 02/10/2002, rectified on 09/07/2002[153]
H46- 29053 Ciobanu, judgment of 16/07/2002, final on 16/10/2002[154]
H46- 32925 Cretu, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002[155]
H46- 32943 Falcoianu and others, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002[156]
H46- 29968 Hodoş and others, judgment of 21/05/2002, final on 04/09/2002[157] [158]
H46- 29407 Vasiliu, judgment of 21/05/2002, final on 04/09/2002[159] [160]
H46- 32260 Surpaceanu Constantin and Traian-Victor, judgment of 21/05/2002,
final on 21/08/2002[161]
- Default interest to be paid
H46- 28342 Brumărescu, judgments of 28/10/99, 23/01/01 (Article 41) and 11/05/01
(rectification) – Grand Chamber[162]
- 2 cases against the Slovak Republic
H46- 41263 Konček, judgment of 26/11/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46- 41384 Varga, judgment of 26/11/2002 - Friendly settlement
- 28 cases against Turkey
- Just satisfaction to be paid
H46- 38578 Kaplan Süleyman, judgment of 10/10/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46- 33234 N.Ö, judgment of 17/10/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46- 29296 İğdeli, judgment of 20/06/2002, final on 20/09/2002
H46- 34481 Filiz and Kalkan, judgment of 20/06/2002, final on 20/09/2002
H46- 33179 Karataş Seher, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002
H46- 30944 Öcal, judgment of 10/10/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46- 36971 Kuray, judgment of 26/11/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46- 27209+ Kiliç Özcan, judgment of 26/11/2002 - Friendly settlement
Section 3.a
H46- 27602 Ekinci Ülkü, judgment of 16/07/2002, final on 16/10/2002[163]
H46- 25656 Orhan Salih, judgment of 18/06/2002, final on 06/11/2002[164] [165]
- Friendly settlement cases containing undertakings by the Turkish Government [166]
H46- 31137 Adalı, judgment of 12/12/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46- 22280 Demir Mahmut, judgment of 05/12/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46- 38588 Keçeci, judgment of 26/11/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46- 31890 Kınay M. and Kınay R., judgment of 26/11/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46- 31154 Şen Filiyet, judgment of 12/12/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46- 31153 Soğukpınar, judgment of 12/12/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46- 36189 Yakar, judgment of 26/11/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46- 31152 Yalçın Şaziment, judgment of 12/12/2002 - Friendly settlement
- Cases relating to delays by the administration in paying additional compensation for expropriation and the applicable rate of default interest
H46- 37087 Bekmezci and others, judgment of 27/06/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46- 26543 Çallı, judgment of 12/12/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46- 19660 Çalkan Dudu, judgment of 28/03/2002, final on 28/06/2002
H46- 20140 Çelebi Mehmet n° 2, judgment of 28/03/2002, final on 28/06/2002
H46- 68117 Denli Nesibe, judgment of 23/07/2002, final on 23/10/2002
H46- 20144 Kartal Adile, judgment of 28/03/2002, final on 28/06/2002
H46- 20152 Özen Mehmet, judgment of 28/03/2002, final on 28/06/2002
H46- 20151 Öztürk Ahmet, judgment of 28/03/2002, final on 28/06/2002
H46- 20155 Şen Aziz n° 2, judgment of 28/03/2002, final on 28/06/2002
- Default interest to be paid
H46- 22876 Şemse Önen, judgment of 26/01/02, final on 14/05/02[167]
- 9 cases against the United Kingdom
H46- 36042 Willis, judgment of 11/06/2002, final on 11/09/2002
H46- 43290 McShane, judgment of 28/05/2002, final on 28/08/2002[168]
H46- 30668+ Wilson and the National Union of journalists; Palmer, Wyeth and the National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers; Doolan and others, judgment of 02/07/2002, final on 02/10/2002
H46- 56547 P., C. and S., judgment of 16/07/2002, final on 16/10/2002[169]
H46- 65905 Rice, judgment of 01/10/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46- 42007 Davies, judgment of 16/07/2002, final on 16/10/2002, rectified on 13/09/2002
H46- 46477 Edwards Paul and Audrey, judgment of 14/03/02, final on 14/06/02[170]
H46- 25680 I., judgment of 11/07/2002 - Grand Chamber
H46- 28957 Goodwin Christine, judgment of 11/07/2002 - Grand Chamber
- 1 case against the « former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia »
H46- 58185 Janeva, judgment of 03/10/2002 - Friendly settlement
3.b SUPERVISION OF THE PAYMENT OF THE CAPITAL SUM OF THE JUST
SATISFACTION IN CASES WHERE THE DEADLINE FOR PAYMENT
EXPIRED MORE THAN 6 MONTHS AGO
Some of the cases appearing under this section concern late payment for reasons beyond the control of the governments concerned.
Expiry date
of the time-limit set
- 12 cases against France
H32- 26984 Picard, Interim Resolution DH(99)30 31/01/1999
H46- 37786 Debboub Husseini Ali, judgment of 09/11/99, final on 09/02/00 09/05/00
H32- 25971 Proma di Franco Gianotti, Interim Resolution DH(99)566 14/05/00+02/01/2001
H32- 31409 Riccobono, Interim Resolution DH(99)557 26/09/2001
H46- 44451 A.A.U., judgment of 19/06/01, final on 19/09/01 19/12/2001
H32- 26242 Lemoine Pierre, Interim Resolution DH(99)353 17/03/2002
H46- 39278 Langlois, judgment of 07/02/02, final on 07/05/02 07/08/2002
H46- 39626 Granata, judgment of 19/03/02, final on 19/06/02 19/09/2002
H46- 44952+ Van der Kar and Lissaur Van West, judgment of 19/03/02,
final on 19/06/02 19/09/2002
H46- 56198 Société Industrielle d’Entretien et de Service (Sies),
judgment of 19/03/02, final on 19/06/02 19/09/2002
H46- 44797+ Etcheveste and Bidart, judgment of 21/03/2002, final on 21/06/2002 21/09/2002
H46- 48215 Lutz, judgment of 26/03/2002, final on 26/06/2002 26/09/2002
- 139 cases against Italy
H46- 31260 Lamperi Balenci, judgment of 21/02/02 - Friendly settlement 21/05/2002
H46- 41232 Quartucci, judgment of 28/03/02 – Friendly settlement 28/06/2002
H46- 20855 Esposito Luigi, judgment of 25/05/00 - Friendly settlement 25/08/2000
H46- 33202 Beyeler, judgments of 05/01/00 (merits) and of 28/05/02 (Article 41) 28/08/2002
- Civil courts
H46- 44421 Galasso, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02 25/04/2002
H46- 44501 Il Messaggero S.A.S. VI, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02 25/04/2002
H46- 51708 I.M., judgment of 11/12/2001, final on 11/03/2002 11/06/2002
H46- 51668 Lopriore, judgment of 11/12/2001, final on 11/03/2002 11/06/2002
H46- 51672 Selva, judgment of 11/12/01, final on 11/03/02 11/06/2002
H46- 41803 Pupillo, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00;
revised judgment on just satisfaction of 18/12/01, final on 18/03/02 18/06/2002
H46- 56101 Mesiti, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02 12/08/2002
H46- 56093 Società Croce Gialla Romana S.a.s., judgment of 12/02/02,
final on 12/05/02 12/08/2002
H46- 51664 Rodolfi, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02 19/08/2002
H46- 41740 Diebold, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02 28/09/2002
H46- 44413 Guerrera Angelo Giuseppe, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 47479 Mastromauro S.R.L., judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02 28/09/2002
- Administrative courts[171]
H46- 44330 Principe and others, judgment of 19/12/00 - Friendly settlement 19/03/2001
H46- 41806 Alesiani and 510 others, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01 27/08/2001
Section 3.b
H46- 41805 Arivella, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01 27/08/2001
H46- 41804 Ciotta, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01 27/08/2001
H46- 35956 Galatà and others, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01 27/08/2001
H46- 44525 Ferrari Marcella II, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02 25/04/2002
H46- 44379 Finessi, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02 25/04/2002
H46- 44343 Massimo Giuseppe I, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02 25/04/2002
H46- 44352 Massimo Giuseppe II, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02 25/04/2002
H46- 44345 Rinaudo and others, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02 25/04/2002
H46- 44342 Gattuso, judgment of 06/12/2001, final on 06/03/2002 06/06/2002
H46- 44333 V.P. and F.D.R., judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02 12/08/2002
H46- 56226 Abate and Ferdinandi, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02 19/08/2002
H46- 56222 Centis, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02 19/08/2002
H46- 56206 Colonnello and others, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02 19/08/2002
H46- 56208 Conte and others, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02 19/08/2002
H46- 56202 Cornia, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02 19/08/2002
H46- 56224 D’Amore, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02 19/08/2002
H46- 56217 De Cesaris, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02 19/08/2002
H46- 56205 Dente, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02 19/08/2002
H46- 56225 Di Pede II, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02 19/08/2002
H46- 56221 Donato, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02 19/08/2002
H46- 56212 Folletti, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02 19/08/2002
H46- 56203 Ginocchio, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02 19/08/2002
H46- 56204 Limatola, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02 19/08/2002
H46- 56207 Lugnan in Basile, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02 19/08/2002
H46- 56220 Mastropasqua, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02 19/08/2002
H46- 56211 Napolitano Giuseppe, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02 19/08/2002
H46- 56213 Piacenti, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02 19/08/2002
H46- 56223 Polcari, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02 19/08/2002
H46- 56219 Presel, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02 19/08/2002
H46- 56214 Ripoli I, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02 19/08/2002
H46- 56215 Ripoli II, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02 19/08/2002
H46- 56201 Sardo Salvatore, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02 19/08/2002
H46- 56218 Stabile Michele, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02 19/08/2002
H46- 44334 Lattanzi and Cascia, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02 28/09/2002
- Labour courts
H46- 43097 Nicoli, judgment of 22/06/00 – Friendly settlement 22/09/2000
H46- 52924 Frattini and others, judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02,
revised judgment of 26/11/2002, final on 26/02/2003[172] 12/08/2002
H46- 51031 Aceto and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 51089 Armellino Francesco, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 52824 Belviso and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 52804 Bianco Pellegrino, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 52816 Biondi and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 51030 Biondo, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 52835 Cerbo and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 52801 Ciarmoli, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 52815 Cimmino and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 52807 Ciullo, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 52821 Colangelo Domenico, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 51164 Crovella, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
Section 3.b
H46- 51163 D’Angelo Michele, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 51125 De Filippo, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 51027 Del Vecchio Anna Rita, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 51155 Della Ratta, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 52813 Di Meo and Masotta, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 52846 Di Meo Antonio, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 51092 Di Mezza, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 51091 Ferrara Clementina, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/2002 28/08/2002
H46- 52843 Franco and Basile, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 51161 Gagliardi, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 52830 Giannotta and Iannella, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 51094 Iacobucci and Lavorgna, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 51170 Izzo Giovanni, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 52802 Lagozzino, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 52812 Lavorgna and Iorio, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 52822 Macolino, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 52819 Mancino, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 51169 Marotta Alberto, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 51168 Martino Alfonso, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 52827 Mastrocinque Mafalda, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 51167 Matera Tommasina, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 52845 Mazzarelli, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 52818 Meola, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 52840 Mongillo Mario, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 44428 Nardone Antonio, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02 28/08/2002
H46- 52832 Nero and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 51029 Ocone, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 51114 Paduano, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 52829 Pallotta, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 51022 Palmieri Mario Francesco, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 52841 Panza, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 52837 Pascale and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 52842 Pascale Elda, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 52826 Pascale Maria Annunziata, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 51162 Pengue, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 52808 Perna Giuseppina, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 52828 Petrillo and Petrucci, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 51025 Petrillo Gino, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 51024 Porto, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 52825 Pucella and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 51126 Raccio Emilia, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 51109 Restuccio, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 52820 Riccardi Vicenzina, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 52823 Romano and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 52844 Romano Rosa, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 52833 Santagata, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 51165 Santina Pelosi, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 40151 Sciarrotta, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02 28/08/2002
H46- 52839 Tanzillo, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 52836 Tazza and Zullo, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 52810 Tazza, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 52809 Truocchio Edmondo, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 51166 Truocchio Mario, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
Section 3.b
H46- 51124 Tudisco, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 52817 Urbano and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 51026 Uzzo, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 52811 Villari, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 52847 Viscuso, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 51028 Vitelli, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 52814 Zoccolillo and others, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
H46- 52800 Zuotto, judgment of 28/02/02, final on 28/05/02 28/08/2002
- Court of Audit
H46- 54307 Meleddu, judgment of 21/02/02 – Friendly settlement 21/05/2002
H46- 54316 Betti, judgment of 28/03/02 – Friendly settlement 28/06/2002
H46- 54293 Chiappetta Domenico, judgment of 28/03/02 – Friendly settlement 28/06/2002
H46- 54287 Ferrari Sergio, judgment of 28/03/02 – Friendly settlement 28/06/2002
H46- 54299 Libertini and Di Girolamo, judgment of 28/03/02 – Friendly settlement 28/06/2002
H46- 44359 Marrama, judgment of 28/03/02 – Friendly settlement 28/06/2002
H46- 54286 Strangi, judgment of 07/05/02 – Friendly settlement 07/08/2002
H46- 54282 Amici, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02 28/09/2002
H46- 54278 Leonardi, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02 28/09/2002
H46- 54312 Manna, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02 28/09/2002
H46- 54319 Sportola, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02 28/09/2002
- Criminal proceedings combined with civil action for damages
H46- 46970 Contardi, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02 28/09/2002
- 4 cases against Poland
H32- 27506 Owczarzak, Interim Resolution DH(99)260 17/03/2002
H46- 38328 Bejer, judgment of 04/10/01, final on 04/01/02[173] 04/04/2002
H46- 32499 Z.R., judgment of 15/01/02 – Friendly settlement 15/04/2002
H46- 34052 Olstowski, judgment of 15/11/01, final on 15/02/02 15/05/2002
- 6 cases against Portugal
H46-762 49018 Marques Jorge Ribeiro, judgment of 04/04/02 – Friendly settlement 04/07/2002
H46- 44298 Tourtier, judgment of 14/02/02, final on 14/05/02 14/08/2002
H46- 49020 F. Santos Lda., judgment of 16/05/02 - Friendly settlement 16/08/2002
H46- 49118 SIB - Sociedade Imobiliária Da Benedita Lda, judgment of 16/05/02
- Friendly settlement 16/08/2002
H46- 48233 Almeida Do Couto, judgment of 30/05/02 - Friendly settlement 30/08/2002
H46- 48752 Coelho, judgment of 30/05/02 - Friendly settlement 30/08/2002
- 1 case against Slovenia
H46- 42320 Belinger, judgment of 13/06/2002 - Friendly settlement 13/09/2002
- 19 cases against Turkey
H46- 25723 Erdoğdu, judgment of 15/06/00 15/09/2000
H46- 28635+ Aksoy Ibrahim, judgment of 10/10/00, final on 10/01/01 10/04/2001
H46- 27308 Demiray, judgment of 21/11/00, final on 04/04/01[174] 04/07/2001
H46- 34688 Akin, judgment of 12/04/01 12/07/2001
Section 3.b
H46- 19265 Atak and others, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01 30/07/2001
H46- 19279 Göçmen and others, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01 30/07/2001
H46- 19285 Karabulut Cemile and others, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01 30/07/2001
H46- 19303 Şen Celal and Keziban, judgment of 10/04/01, final on 10/07/01 10/10/2001
H46- 28505 Ülger, judgment of 28/03/02 – Friendly settlement 28/06/2002
H46- 27694 A.S., judgment of 28/03/02 – Friendly settlement 28/06/2002
H46- 29856 Özcan Mehmet, judgment of 09/04/02 – Friendly settlement 09/07/2002
H46- 38916 Atalağ, judgment of 27/06/2002 - Friendly settlement 27/09/2002
H46- 38915 Bayram Abdullah Naci, judgment of 27/06/2002 - Friendly settlement 27/09/2002
H46- 35867 Bayram and others, judgment of 27/06/2002 - Friendly settlement 27/09/2002
H46- 37414 Birsel and others, judgment of 27/06/2002 - Friendly settlement 27/09/2002
H46- 35050 Karabıyık and others, judgment of 27/06/2002 - Friendly settlement 27/09/2002
H46- 33419 Özdiler Hasan Doğan, judgment of 27/06/2002 - Friendly settlement 27/09/2002
H46- 35079 Özkan and others, judgment of 27/06/2002 - Friendly settlement 27/09/2002
H46- 35866 Ünlü Dudu, judgment of 27/06/2002 - Friendly settlement 27/09/2002
- 5 cases against the United Kingdom
H46- 28883 McKerr, judgment of 04/05/01, final on 04/08/01[175] 04/11/2001
H46- 37715 Shanaghan, judgment of 04/05/01, final on 04/08/01[176] 04/11/2001
H46- 24746 Hugh Jordan, judgment of 04/05/01, final on 04/08/01[177] 04/11/2001
H46- 30054 Kelly and others, judgment of 04/05/01, final on 04/08/01[178] 04/11/2001
H46- 24265 Devenney, judgment of 19/03/02, final on 19/06/02 19/09/2002
Table summarising the total number of cases by States
State |
No confirmation of payment of the capital sum |
No confirmation of payment of the capital sum although payment due since more than 6 months |
Payment after expiration of the time-limit set and no confirmation of payment of the default interest due |
3.c EXAMINATION OF SPECIAL PAYMENT PROBLEMS (FOR EXAMPLE THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THE APPLICANT, DISPUTES REGARDING THE EXACT AMOUNT PAID AS A RESULT OF EXCHANGE RATE PROBLEMS OR ADMINISTRATIVE FEES)
- 2 cases against Italy
H46- 53708 Mas A. and 207 others, judgment of 07/06/01 – Friendly settlement
H46- 53705 M.L. and 46 others, judgment of 05/04/01 – Friendly settlement
- 36 cases against Turkey
H46- 30947 Alpay, judgment of 27/02/01 – Friendly settlement
H46- 26093+ B.T. and others, judgment of 14/11/00 – Friendly settlement[179]
H46- 28340 Büyükdağ, judgment of 21/12/00, final on 21/03/01
H46- 25182+ Cankoçak, judgment of 20/02/01, final on 20/05/01
H46- 25724 Cihan, judgment of 30/01/01 – Friendly settlement
H46- 31963 Özel and others, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46- 26680 Şener, judgment of 18/07/00
H46- 27697+ Yaşar and others, judgment of 14/11/00, final on 14/02/01
H46- 19310 Yilmaz Hamit, judgment of 10/04/01, final on 10/07/01
H46- 19308 Yilmaz Zekeriya, judgment of 10/04/01, final on 10/07/01
H46- 26976+ Sürek Kamil Tekin V, judgment of 16/07/2002 - Friendly settlement
H54- 22729 Kaya Mehmet, judgment of 19/02/98, Interim Resolutions DH(99)434 and ResDH(2002)98[180]
H54- 21893 Akdivar, Çiçek, Aktaş, Karabulut, judgment of 16/09/96, Interim Resolutions DH(99)434 and ResDH(2002)98[181]
H54- 23178 Aydin, judgment of 25/09/97, Interim Resolutions DH(99)434 and
H54- 24276 Kurt, judgment of 25/05/98, Interim Resolutions DH(99)434 and ResDH(2002)98[183]
H54- 23818 Ergi, judgment of 28/07/98, Interim Resolutions DH(99)434 and ResDH(2002)98[184]
H54- 22495 Yaşa, judgment of 02/09/98, Interim Resolutions DH(99)434 and
H46- 23657 Çakici, judgment of 08/07/99, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98[186]
H46- 23763 Tanrikulu, judgment of 08/07/99, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98[187]
H46- 23144 Özgür Gündem, judgment of 16/03/00, Interim Resolution ResDH(2001)106
H46- 22535 Kaya Mahmut, judgment of 28/03/00, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98[188]
H46- 22492 Kiliç, judgment of 28/03/00, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98[189]
H46- 20764 Ertak Ismail, judgment of 09/05/00, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98[190]
H46- 23531 Timurtaş, judgment of 13/06/00, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98[191]
H46- 21986 Salman, judgment of 27/06/00 – Grand Chamber, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98[192]
H46- 22277 Ilhan Nasir, judgment of 27/06/00, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98[193]
Section 3.c
H32- 23179+ Yilmaz, Ovat, Şahin and Dündar, Interim Resolutions DH(99)434 and ResDH(2002)98[194]
H32- 25658 Aslantaş Sedat, Interim Resolutions DH(99)560 and ResDH(2001)106
H46- 22947+ Akkoç Nebahat, judgment of 10/10/00, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98[195]
H46- 24396 Taş Beşir, judgment of 14/11/00, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98[196]
H46- 23819 Bilgin İhsan, judgment of 16/11/00, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98[197]
H46- 22676 Gül Mehmet, judgment of 14/12/00, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98[198]
H46- 25801 Dulaş Zubeyde, judgment of 30/01/01, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98[199]
H46- 22493 Berktay, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98[200]
H46- 24490 Şarli, judgment of 22/05/01, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98[201]
H46- 23954 Akdeniz and others, judgment of 31/05/01, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98[202]
SECTION 4 - CASES RAISING SPECIFIC QUESTION
(INDIVIDUAL MEASURES, MEASURES NOT YET DEFINED OR SPECIAL PROBLEMS)
(See Addendum 4 for part or all these cases)
Action
The Deputies are invited to supervise the progress made in the adoption of the implementing measures in the following cases raising several problems. Supplementary information on some or all the cases listed below will be issued in Addendum 4. The Deputies are invited to resume consideration of these items on a case-by-case basis.
SUB-SECTION 4.1 – SUPERVISION OF INDIVIDUAL MEASURES ONLY[203]
- 1 case against Belgium
H46- 37370 Stratégies and Communications and Dumoulin, judgment of 15/07/2002, final on 15/10/2002[204]
- 1 case against Bulgaria
H46- 50963 Al-Nashif and others, judgment of 20/06/2002, final on 20/09/2002
- 3 cases against France
H46- 47160 Ezzouhdi., judgment of 13/02/01, final on 13/05/01
H46- 57753 C.K., judgment of 19/03/02, final on 19/06/02
H46- 54210 Papon, judgment of 25/07/2002, final on 25/10/2002[205]
- 1 case against Germany
H46- 46544 Kutzner, judgment of 26/02/2002, final on 10/07/2002
- 3 cases against Italy
H54- 12151 F.C.B., judgment of 28/08/91, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)30 and Resolution DH(93)6
H46- 37119 N.F., judgment of 02/08/2001, final on 12/12/2001[206]
H46- 57574+ Sulejmanovic and others and Sejdovic and Sulejmanovic, judgment of 08/11/2002 - Friendly settlement[207]
- 1 case against Portugal
H46- 43999 Martins Serra and Andrade Cancio, judgment of 06/12/01, final on 06/03/02
- 1 case against Turkey
H46- 29900+ Sadak, Zana, Dicle and Doğan, judgment of 17/07/01, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)59
- 3 cases against the United Kingdom
H54- 19187 Saunders, judgment of 17/12/96, Interim Resolution DH(2000)27
H46- 29522+ I.J.L., G.M.R. and A.K.P., judgment of 19/09/00
H46- 36533 Atlan A. and T., judgment of 19/06/01, final on 19/09/01
SUB-SECTION 4.2 – INDIVIDUAL MEASURES AND/OR GENERAL PROBLEMS
- 4 cases against Austria
H46- 38536 Schreder, judgment of 13/12/01, final on 13/03/02
H46- 50110 Maurer, judgment of 17/01/02, final on 17/04/02
H46- 35673 Schweighofer and others, judgment of 09/10/01, final on 09/01/02
H46- 24430 Lanz, judgment of 31/01/02, final on 31/04/02
- 1 case against Belgium
H46- 51564 Čonka, judgment of 05/02/02, final on 05/05/02[208]
- 4 cases against Bulgaria
H46- 33977 Ilijkov, judgment of 26/07/01
H46- 29221 Stankov and the United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden, judgment of 02/10/01, final on 02/01/02
H46- 41488 Velikova, judgment of 18/05/00, final on 04/10/00
H46- 38361 Anguelova, judgment of 13/06/2002, final on 13/09/2002
- 1 case against Croatia
H46- 48778 Kutić, judgment of 01/03/02, final on 01/06/02
- 2 cases against Cyprus
H46- 30873 Egmez, judgment of 21/12/00
H46- 25316+ Denizci and others, judgment of 23/05/01, final on 23/08/01
- 6 cases against France
H46- 24846 Zielinski and Pradal and Gonzalez and others, judgment of 28/10/99 - Grand Chamber
H32- 33656 Lemoine Daniel
H46- 39594 Kress, judgment of 07/06/01 – Grand Chamber[209]
H46- 38436 APBP, judgment of 21/03/2002, final on 21/06/2002
H46- 38748 Immeubles Groupe Kosser, judgment of 21/03/2002, final on 21/06/2002[210]
H46- 36515 Fretté, judgment of 26/02/02, final on 26/05/02
- 7 cases against Greece
H46- 47760 Koskinas, judgment of 20/06/02, final on 20/09/02
H46- 46355 Tsirikakis, judgments of 17/01/02, final on 10/07/02[211] and of 23/01/03 (Article 41), final up to 23/04/03[212]
H46- 40907 Dougoz, judgment of 06/03/01, final on 06/06/01
H46- 28524 Peers, judgment of 19/04/01
H46- 38460 Platakou, judgment of 11/01/01, final on 06/09/01[213]
Sub-Section 4.1
H46- 25701 former King of Greece, Princess Irene and Princess Ekaterini, judgments of 23/11/00 and of 28/11/02 (Article 41) - Grand Chamber
H46- 47541 Vasilopoulou, judgment of 21/03/02, final on 21/06/02
- 3 cases against Ireland
H46- 36887 Quinn, judgment of 21/12/00, final on 21/03/01
H46- 34720 Heaney and McGuinness, judgment of 21/12/00, final on 21/03/01
H46- 39474 D.G., judgment of 16/05/02, final on 16/08/02[214]
- 4 cases against Italy
H46- 41879 Saggio, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H32- 33286 Dorigo Paolo, Interim Resolutions DH(99)258 and ResDH(2002)30
H46- 30127 Sciortino, judgment of 18/10/01, final on 27/03/02
H46- 31143 Indelicato, judgment of 18/10/01, final on 18/01/02[215]
- 1 case against Moldova
H46- 45701 Metropolitan Chruch of Bessarabia and others, judgment of 13/12/01, final on 27/03/02[216]
- 1 case against the Netherlands
H46- 37328 A.B., judgment of 29/01/02, final on 29/04/02
- 1 case against Poland
H46- 26760 Werner, judgment of 15/11/01
- 1 case against Portugal
H46- 44872 Magalhaes Pereira, judgment of 26/02/02, final on 26/05/02
- 15 cases against Romania
H46- 31679 Ignaccolo-Zenide, judgment of 25/01/00
H46- 28114 Dalban, judgment of 28/09/99 - Grand Chamber
H46- 28871 Constantinescu, judgment of 27/06/00
H46- 28342 Brumărescu, judgments of 28/10/99, 23/01/01 (Article 41) and 11/05/01
(rectification) – Grand Chamber[217]
H46- 29411 Anghelescu, judgment of 09/04/02, final on 09/07/02
H46- 35831 Bălănescu, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002[218]
Sub-Section 4.2
H46- 34992 Basacopol, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002[219]
H46- 33912 Budescu and Petrescu, judgment of 02/07/2002, final on 02/10/2002, rectified on 09/07/2002[220]
H46- 29053 Ciobanu, judgment of 16/07/2002, final on 16/10/2002[221]
H46- 32925 Cretu, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002[222]
H46- 32943 Falcoianu and others, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002[223]
H46- 29968 Hodoş and others, judgment of 21/05/2002, final on 04/09/2002[224] [225]
H46- 33358 Oprea and others, judgment of 16/07/2002, final on 16/10/2002[226]
H46- 32260 Surpaceanu Constantin and Traian-Victor, judgment of 21/05/2002,
final on 21/08/2002[227]
H46- 29407 Vasiliu, judgment of 21/05/2002, final on 04/09/2002[228] [229]
- 1 case against the Russian Federation
H46- 47095 Kalashnikov, judgment of 15/07/2002, final on 15/10/2002
- 2 cases against San Marino
H46- 24954 Tierce and others, judgment of 25/07/00
H46- 35396 Stefanelli, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00
- 2 cases against the Slovak Republic
H46- 40058 Gajdúšek, judgment of 18/12/01, final on 18/03/02
H46- 48672 Nemec and others, judgment of 15/11/01, final on 15/02/02
- 4 cases against Switzerland
H46- 26899 H.B., judgment of 05/04/01, final on 05/07/01
H46- 31827 J.B., judgment of 03/05/01, final on 03/08/01
H54- 20919 E.L., R.L. and O.-L., judgment of 29/08/97, Interim Resolution DH(99)111
H54- 19958 A.P., M.P. and T.P., judgment of 29/08/97, Interim Resolution DH(99)110
- 109 cases against Turkey
H46- 34382 Danemark, judgment of 05/04/00- Friendly settlement
H46- 40035 Jabari, judgment of 11/07/00, final on 11/10/00
H46- 25144+ Sadak Selim and others, judgment of 11/06/2002, final on 06/11/2002[230]
- Cases concerning length of criminal proceedings
H46- 31880 Adıyaman, judgment of 30/10/01, final on 30/01/02
H46- 32964 Akçam, judgment of 30/10/01, final on 30/01/02
H46- 33362 Akyazı, judgment of 30/10/01, final on 30/01/02
Sub-Section 4.2
H46- 29280 Başpınar, judgment of 30/10/01, final on 30/01/02
H46- 29913 Binbir, judgment of 07/02/02, final on 07/05/02
H46- 26480 Bürkev, judgment of 30/10/01, final on 30/01/02
H46- 29912 Çilengir, judgment of 07/02/02, final on 07/05/02
H46- 32981 Dede and others, judgment of 07/05/02, final on 07/08/02
H46- 29699 Dinleten, judgment of 07/02/02, final on 07/05/02
H46- 31891 Genç, judgment of 30/10/01, final on 30/01/02
H46- 39428 İnan, judgment of 30/10/01, final on 30/01/02
H46- 28291 Kanbur, judgment of 30/10/01, final on 30/01/02
H46- 32990 Karademir, judgment of 30/10/01, final on 30/01/02
H46- 32987 Keskin, judgment of 30/10/01, final on 30/01/02
H46- 29360 Ketenoğlu Gülşen and Ketenoğlu Halil Yasin, judgment of 25/09/01, final on 25/12/01
H46- 29700 Metinoğlu, judgment of 07/02/02, final on 07/05/02
H46- 29701 Özcan Süleyman, judgment of 07/02/02, final on 07/05/02
H46- 31960 Pekdaş, judgment of 30/10/01, final on 30/01/02
H46- 31961 Şahin Metin, judgment of 25/09/01, final on 25/12/01
H46- 29702 Sarıtaç, judgment of 07/02/02, final on 07/05/02
H46- 29911 Uygur, judgment of 07/02/02, final on 07/05/02
H46- 31834 Yağız Hasan, judgment of 30/10/01, final on 30/01/02
H46- 29703 Zülal, judgment of 07/02/02, final on 07/05/02
- Action of the security forces
H46- 23954 Akdeniz and others, judgment of 31/05/01, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98[231]
H54- 21893 Akdivar, Çiçek, Aktaş, Karabulut, judgment of 16/09/96, Interim Resolutions DH(99)434 and ResDH(2002)98[232]
H46- 22947+ Akkoç Nebahat, judgment of 10/10/00, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98[233]
H54- 21987 Aksoy, judgment of 18/12/96, Interim Resolutions DH(99)434 and ResDH(2002)98
H46- 22279 Altay, judgment of 22/05/01, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98
H46- 25657 Avşar, judgment of 10/07/01, final on 27/03/2000[234]
H54- 23178 Aydin, judgment of 25/09/97, Interim Resolutions DH(99)434 and ResDH(2002)98[235]
H46- 26093+ B.T. and others, judgment of 14/11/00 – Friendly settlement[236]
H46- 22493 Berktay, judgment of 01/03/01, final on 01/06/01, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98[237]
H46- 23819 Bilgin İhsan, judgment of 16/11/00, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98[238]
H46- 25659 Bilgin İrfan, judgment of 17/07/01, final on 17/10/01, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98
H46- 23657 Çakici, judgment of08/07/99, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98[239]
H32- 22677 Çetin, Interim Resolutions DH(99)434 and ResDH(2002)98
H46- 25704 Çiçek, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 05/09/01, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98[240]
H46- 27308 Demiray, judgment of 21/11/00, final on 04/04/01[241]
Sub-Section 4.2
H46- 20869 Dikme, judgment of 11/07/00, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98
H46- 25801 Dulaş Zubeyde, judgment of 30/01/01, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98[242]
H46- 27602 Ekinci Ülkü, judgment of 16/07/2002, final on 16/10/2002[243]
H54- 23818 Ergi, judgment of28/07/98, Interim Resolutions DH(99)434 and ResDH(2002)98[244]
H46- 20764 Ertak Ismail, judgment of 09/05/00, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98[245]
H46- 22676 Gül Mehmet, judgment of 14/12/00, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98[246]
H54- 21593 Güleç, judgment of 27/07/98, Interim Resolutions DH(99)434 and ResDH(2002)98
H46- 22277 Ilhan Nasir, judgment of 27/06/00, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98[247]
H46- 22535 Kaya Mahmut, judgment of 28/03/00, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98[248]
H54- 22729 Kaya Mehmet, judgment of 19/02/98, Interim Resolutions DH(99)434 and ResDH(2002)98[249]
H46- 22492 Kiliç, judgment of 28/03/00, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98[250]
H54- 24276 Kurt, judgment of 25/05/98, Interim Resolutions DH(99)434 and ResDH(2002)98[251]
H54- 23186 Menteş, Turhallı M. and S, and Uvat, judgment of 28/11/97, Interim Resolution DH(99)434
H46- 21594 Oğur, judgment of 20/05/99 - Grand Chamber, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98
H46- 31889 Orak Abdurrahman, judgment of 14/02/02, final on 14/05/02
H46- 25656 Orhan Salih, judgment of 18/06/2002, final on 06/11/2002[252] [253]
H46- 21986 Salman, judgment of 27/06/00 – Grand Chamber, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98[254]
H46- 24490 Şarli, judgment of 22/05/01, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98[255]
H46- 31866 Satık and others, judgment of 10/10/00, final on 10/01/01, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98
H54- 23184 Selçuk and Asker, judgment of 24/04/98, Interim Resolutions DH(99)434 and ResDH(2002)98
H46- 22876 Şemse Önen, judgment of 26/01/02, final on 14/05/02[256]
H46- 26129 Tanlı, judgment of 10/04/01, final on 10/07/01, rectified on 28/04/01, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98
H46- 23763 Tanrikulu, judgment of08/07/99, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98[257]
H46- 24396 Taş Beşir, judgment of 14/11/00, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98[258]
H54- 22496 Tekin, judgment of 09/06/98, Interim Resolutions DH(99)434 and ResDH(2002)98
H46- 23531 Timurtaş, judgment of 13/06/00, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98[259]
H46- 32357 Veznedaroğlu Sevtap, judgment of 11/04/00, final on 18/10/00, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)98 [260]
Sub-Section 4.2
H54- 22495 Yaşa, judgment of02/09/98, Interim Resolutions DH(99)434 and ResDH(2002)98[261]
H32- 23179+ Yilmaz, Ovat, Şahin and Dündar, Interim Resolutions DH(99)434 and ResDH(2002)98[262]
- Cases concerning dissolution of political parties
H46- 23885 Freedom and Democracy Party (ÖZDEP), judgment of 08/12/99 - Grand Chamber
H54- 19392 United Communist Party of Turkey and others, judgment of 30/01/98
H54- 21237 Socialist Party and others, judgment of 25/05/98, Interim Resolution DH(99)245
H46- 22723 Yazar, Karataş, Aksoy and People’s Labour Party (HEP), judgment of 09/04/02
- Friendly settlement cases containing undertakings by the Turkish Government
H46- 24940 Acar, judgment of 18/12/01 - Friendly settlement
H46- 31137 Adalı, judgment of 12/12/2002 - Friendly settlement[263]
H46- 32598 Akbay, judgment of 04/10/01 - Friendly settlement
H46- 37453 Akman, judgment of 26/06/01, final on 25/10/2001[264] - Striking-out
H46- 24935 Avcı, judgment of 10/07/01 - Friendly settlement
H46- 28293 Aydın K., C. Aydin and S. Aydin and others, judgment of 10/07/01- Friendly settlement
H46- 29289 Aydın Mehmet, judgment of 16/07/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46- 24946 Boğ, judgment of 10/07/01 - Friendly settlement
H46- 24938 Boğa, judgment of 10/07/01 - Friendly settlement
H46- 24934 Değer, judgment of 10/07/01 - Friendly settlement
H46- 22280 Demir Mahmut, judgment of 05/12/2002 - Friendly settlement[265]
H46- 24990 Demir, judgment of 10/07/01 - Friendly settlement
H46- 24939 Doğan, judgment of 10/07/01 - Friendly settlement
H46- 30492 Erat and Sağlam, judgment of 26/03/02 – Friendly settlement
H46- 31246 Ercan, judgment of 25/09/01 - Friendly settlement
H46- 26337 Erdoğan Mahmut, judgment of 20/06/02 - Friendly settlement
H46- 24945 Güngü Kemal, judgment of 18/12/01 - Friendly settlement
H46- 30953 I.I., I.S., K.E., and A.O., judgment of 06/11/01 - Friendly settlement
H46- 38588 Keçeci, judgment of 26/11/2002 - Friendly settlement[266]
H46- 31890 Kınay M. and Kınay R., judgment of 26/11/2002 - Friendly settlement[267]
H46- 24944 Kızılgedik, judgment of 10/07/01 - Friendly settlement
H46- 31136 Önder Yalçın, judgment of 25/07/02 - Friendly settlement
H46- 24936 Orak Adnan, judgment of 10/07/01 - Friendly settlement
H46- 27735 Oral and others, judgment of 28/03/02 - Friendly settlement
H46- 31883 Özbey, judgment of 31/01/02 - Friendly settlement
H46- 24942 Parlak, Aktürk and Tay, judgment of 10/07/01 - Friendly settlement
H46- 29359 Saki, judgment of 30/10/01 - Friendly settlement
H46- 31154 Şen Filiyet, judgment of 12/12/2002 - Friendly settlement[268]
H46- 24991 Şenses, judgment of 10/07/01 - Friendly settlement
Sub-Section 4.2
H46- 31153 Soğukpınar, judgment of 12/12/2002 - Friendly settlement[269]
H46- 36189 Yakar, judgment of 26/11/2002 - Friendly settlement[270]
H46- 31152 Yalçın Şaziment, judgment of 12/12/2002 - Friendly settlement[271]
H46- 22281 Yaşa Sıddık, judgment of 27/06/02 - Friendly settlement
H46- 32979 Yıldız Özgür, judgment of 16/07/02 - Friendly settlement
H46- 27532 Z.Y., judgment of 09/04/02 - Friendly settlement
- 1 case against Ukraine
H46- 48553 Sovtransavto Holding, judgment of 25/07/2002, final on 06/11/2002[272]
- 21 cases against the United Kingdom
H32- 23496 Quinn, Interim Resolutions DH(98)214 and ResDH(2002)85
H32- 22384 Murray Kevin, Interim Resolutions DH (98)156 and ResDH(2002)85
H46- 28135 Magee, judgment of 06/06/00, final on 06/09/00, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)85
H54- 18731 Murray John, judgment of 08/02/96, Interim Resolutions DH(2000)26, ResDH(2002)85
H46- 36408 Averill, judgment of 06/06/00, final on 06/09/00, Interim Resolution ResDH(2002)85
H46- 46295 Stafford, judgment of 28/05/02 - Grand Chamber
H46- 37555 O'Hara, judgment of 16/10/01, final on 16/01/02
H46- 38784 Morris, judgment of 26/02/02, final on 26/05/02
H46- 27229 Keenan, judgment of 03/04/01
H46- 35605 Kingsley, judgment of 28/05/02 - Grand Chamber
H46- 39846 Brennan, judgment of 16/10/01, final on 16/01/02
H46- 35765 A.D.T., judgment of 31/07/00, final on 31/10/00
H46- 44787 P.G. and J.H., judgment of 25/09/01, final on 25/12/01
H46- 56547 P., C. and S., judgment of 16/07/2002, final on 16/10/2002[273]
H46- 46477 Edwards Paul and Audrey, judgment of 14/03/02, final on 14/06/02[274]
H54- 25599 A., judgment of 23/09/98
Action of the security forces (CM/Inf(2003)4)
H46- 43290 McShane, judgment of 28/05/2002, final on 28/08/2002[275]
H46- 28883 McKerr, judgment of 04/05/01, final on 04/08/01[276]
H46- 37715 Shanaghan, judgment of 04/05/01, final on 04/08/01[277]
H46- 24746 Hugh Jordan, judgment of 04/05/01, final on 04/08/01[278]
H46- 30054 Kelly and others, judgment of 04/05/01, final on 04/08/01[279]
SUB-SECTION 4.3 – SPECIAL PROBLEMS
- 117 cases against Italy
117 cases concerning length of proceedings before administrative courts [280]
H46- 41809 A.B. V, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00
H46- 56226 Abate and Ferdinandi, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H32- 29171 Abbate Giovanni, Interim Resolution DH(97)367
H54- 25587 Abenavoli, judgment of 02/09/97
H46- 41806 Alesiani and 510 others, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H32- 26863 Almanno, Interim Resolution DH(96)611
H46- 41805 Arivella, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H32- 25579 B.Q., Interim Resolution DH(96)213
H32- 26864 Bacci Roberto Maria, Interim Resolution DH(96)612
H32- 25585 Bagnoli and Mazzone G., A. and M., Interim Resolution DH(96)214
H32- 34878 Barcellona, Interim Resolution DH(99)202
H32- 35343 Bertozzi, Vorrasi, Ciarmoli and Forgione, Interim Resolution DH(99)642
H32- 27189 Bevilacqua, Interim Resolution DH(97)524
H46- 34437 Caliendo, judgment of 14/03/00, final on 14/03/00
H46- 41817 Caliri, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00
H46- 44341 Cannone, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002
H46- 44347 Carapella and others, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002
H32- 19977 Carriero, Interim Resolution DH(96)26
H32- 31628 Catania, Interim Resolution DH(99)414
H32- 25576 Cavaliero s.n.c., Interim Resolution DH(96)215
H32- 34882 Cecamore, Interim Resolution DH(99)203
H46- 44332 Cecchini, judgment of 21/11/00, final on 21/02/01
H46- 44350 Cecere Domenico, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002
H46- 56222 Centis, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H32- 29170 Cerruto, Interim Resolution DH(97)368
H32- 29125 Chierici B. and E., Interim Resolution DH(97)331
H46- 41804 Ciotta, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46- 56206 Colonnello and others, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H46- 41811 Comitini, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46- 56208 Conte and others, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H46- 56202 Cornia, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H32- 27494 Corona Vincenzo, Interim Resolution DH(97)020
H32- 25577 Cosma, Interim Resolution DH(96)216
H32- 25588 D.M. II, Interim Resolution DH(96)217
H46- 56224 D’Amore, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H32- 27996+ D'Amico and Altobelli, Interim Resolution DH(97)130
H46- 56217 De Cesaris, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H54- 25574 De Santa, judgment of 02/09/97
H32- 20359 Della Sala Raffaele, Interim Resolution DH(96)614
H46- 44337 Delli Paoli, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002
H46- 56205 Dente, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H32- 14147+ Di Bonaventura
H46- 56225 Di Pede II, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H46- 56221 Donato, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H46- 44525 Ferrari Marcella II, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H46- 44379 Finessi, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H46- 56212 Folletti, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H46- 44349 Fragnito, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002
Sub-Section 4.3
H32- 30600 G. D.P., Interim Resolution DH(97)525
H32- 25584 G.L.C., Interim Resolution DH(96)218
H32- 31622 G.O. II, Interim Resolution DH(97)654
H46- 35956 Galatà and others, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46- 44342 Gattuso, judgment of 06/12/2001, final on 06/03/2002
H46- 44340 Gaudenzi, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002
H46- 56203 Ginocchio, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H32- 25580 Giorgini, Interim Resolution DH(96)219
H54- 25586 Lapalorcia, judgment of 02/09/97
H32- 25581 Latini, Interim Resolution DH(96)220
H46- 44334 Lattanzi and Cascia, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46- 56204 Limatola, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H46- 56207 Lugnan in Basile, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H32- 15080 Magnaghi, Interim Resolution DH(96)379
H32- 27994+ Manzini and Benet, Interim Resolution DH(97)129
H46- 44343 Massimo Giuseppe I, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H46- 44352 Massimo Giuseppe II, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H46- 56220 Mastropasqua, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H32- 38149 Mazzone G. and E. I, Interim Resolution DH(99)306
H32- 38150 Mazzone G. and E. II, Interim Resolution DH(99)307
H46- 33804 Mennitto, judgment of 05/10/00
H32- 25589 Mentastro, Interim Resolution DH(96)221
H46- 38594 Mereu and S. Maria Navarrese, judgment of 13/06/2002, final on 13/09/2002
H46- 44338 Miele, judgment of 21/11/00, final on 21/02/01
H46- 41815 Monti Enrico, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00
H32- 17814 Mori Puddu, Interim Resolution DH(97)177
H46- 41810 Mosca, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00
H32- 38526 Murgo M, O, and S. and Giannone, Interim Resolution DH(99)415
H32- 30322 Nani, Interim Resolution DH(98)193
H46- 56211 Napolitano Giuseppe, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H46- 44348 Nazzaro and others, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002
H54- 25839 Nicodemo, judgment of 02/09/97
H46- 44335 O., judgment of 17/10/00, final on 17/01/01
H32- 18908 P.P. III, Interim Resolution DH(97)111
H46- 44351 Pace and others, judgment of 09/07/2002, final on 09/10/2002
H32- 35950+ Paglietti and 126 others, Interim Resolution DH(99)99
H46- 41816 Paradiso Antonio, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00
H32- 15800+ Perego and Romanet
H46- 56213 Piacenti, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H46- 56223 Polcari, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H32- 34880 Polto Miranda, Interim Resolution DH(99)204
H46- 56219 Presel, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H46- 31631 Procaccini, judgment of 30/03/00, final on 30/03/00
H32- 27999+ Recinelli and Corona, Interim Resolution DH(97)132
H32- 27493 Recinelli, Interim Resolution DH(97)21
H32- 27997 Ridolfi, Interim Resolution DH(97)131
H46- 44345 Rinaudo and others, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H46- 56214 Ripoli I, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H46- 56215 Ripoli II, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H32- 26865+ Rubbo and others, Interim Resolution DH(96)613
H32- 34881 Ruocco, Interim Resolution DH(99)643
H32- 25582 Sansoni, Interim Resolution DH(96)222
H32- 31625 Santoro Claudio, Interim Resolution DH(97)655
H46- 56201 Sardo Salvatore, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
Sub-Section 4.3
H32- 29672 Scopelliti II, Interim Resolution DH(97)469
H32- 27484+ Serino and others, Interim Resolution DH(97)133
H32- 25450 Spera Michele, Interim Resolution DH(97)372
H46- 56218 Stabile Michele, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H32- 34283 Stampacchia, Interim Resolution DH(98)272
H32- 25583 Stracuzzi, Interim Resolution DH(96)241
H32- 25578 Turrina and Scattolini, Interim Resolution DH(96)223
H32- 31620 U. P., Interim Resolution DH(97)656
H32- 38152 Ullo, Interim Resolution DH(99)308
H46- 44333 V.P. and F.D.R., judgment of 12/02/02, final on 12/05/02
H46- 44346 Venturini Alberto II, judgment of 25/10/01, final on 25/01/02
H32- 29301 Vitali II, Interim Resolution DH(97)332
H32- 29302 Vitali III, Interim Resolution DH(97)333
H32- 39170 Zappalà, Interim Resolution DH(99)523
H46- 41814 Zeoli and 34 others, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 05/10/00
- 2 cases against Turkey
H46- 25781 Cyprus against Turkey, judgment of 10/05/01 – Grand Chamber
H46- 26308 Institut de Prêtres français and others, judgment of 14/12/00 – Friendly settlement
SECTION 5 - SUPERVISION OF GENERAL MEASURES ALREADY ANNOUNCED
(See Addendum 5 for part or all these cases)
Action
The Deputies are invited to supervise progress in the adoption of general measures aiming at preventing further similar violations to those found by the Court in the following cases. If necessary, supplementary information on some or all the cases listed below will appear in Addendum 5. The Deputies are invited to resume consideration of these cases in 6 months at the latest.
SUB-SECTION 5.1 – LEGISLATIVE AND/OR REGULATORY CHANGES
- 1 case against Austria
H46- 49455 Gollner, judgment of 17/01/02, final on 17/04/02
- 1 case against Liechtenstein
H46- 28396 Wille, judgment of 28/10/99 - Grand Chamber
- 3 cases against Malta
H46- 25642 Aquilina, judgment of 29/04/99 - Grand Chamber
H46- 25644 T.W., judgment of 29/04/99 - Grand Chamber
H46- 35892 Sabeur Ben Ali, judgment of 29/06/00, final on 29/09/00
- 1 case against the Netherlands
H46- 25989 Van Vlimmeren and Van Ilverenbeek, judgment of 26/09/00
- 22 cases against Poland
- Cases concerning length of civil proceedings
H54- 27916 Podbielski, judgment of 30/10/98
H54- 28616 Styranowski, judgment of 30/10/98
H46- 38328 Bejer, judgment of 04/10/01, final on 04/01/02[281]
H46- 27918 C., judgment of 03/05/01
H32- 24559 Gibas, Interim Resolution DH(97)242[282]
H46- 48001 Goc, judgment of 16/04/02, final on 16/07/02
H46- 29695 Gronuś, judgment of 28/05/02, final on 28/08/02
H46- 71891 Hałka and others, judgment of 02/07/2002, final on 02/10/2002[283]
H46- 29691 Jedamski, judgment of 26/07/01, final on 26/10/01
H46- 43779 Mączyński, judgment of 15/01/02, final on 15/04/02
H46- 35843 Malinowska, judgment of 14/12/00, final on 14/03/01
H46- 36250 Parciński, judgment of 18/03/01, final on 18/03/02
H46- 40330 Piechota, judgment of 05/11/2002, final on 05/02/2003 [284]
H46- 29455 Pogorzelec, judgment of 17/07/01, final on 12/12/01
H46- 37645 Sawicka, judgment of 01/10/2002, final on 01/01/2003[285]
H46- 25693+ Sobczyk, judgment of 26/10/00, final on 26/01/01
H46- 40835 Szaparo, judgment of 23/05/02, final on 23/08/02
H46- 48684 Uthke, judgment of 18/06/02, final on 18/09/02[286]
H46- 65660 W.Z., judgment of 24/10/2002, final on 24/01/2003[287]
H46- 32734 Wasilewski, judgment of 21/12/00, final on 06/09/01
H46- 33082 Wojnowicz, judgment of 21/09/00, final on 22/01/01
H46- 34158 Zawadzki, judgment of 20/12/01, final on 27/03/02
Sub-section 5.1
- 3 cases against Romania
H54- 27053 Vasilescu, judgment of 22/05/98, Interim Resolution DH(99)676
H54- 27273 Petra, judgment of 23/09/98
H46- 28341 Rotaru, judgment of 04/05/00 - Grand Chamber
- 2 cases against the-United Kingdom
H54- 22520 Johnson Stanley, judgment of 24/10/97
H46- 30308 Faulkner Ian, judgment of 30/11/99 - Friendly settlement
SUB-SECTION 5.2 – CHANGES OF COURTS’ CASE-LAW OR OF ADMINISTRATIVE PRACTICE
No new case
SUB-SECTION 5.3 – PUBLICATION / DISSEMINATION
(NO DEBATE ENVISAGED)
- 1 case against Germany
H46- 34045 Hoffmann, judgment of 11/10/01, final on 11/01/02
- 2 cases against Finland
H46- 31611 Nikula, judgment of 21/03/02, final on 21/06/02
H46- 49684 Hirvisaari, judgment of 27/09/01, final on 27/12/01
- 1 case against Greece
H46- 43622 Malama, judgments of 01/03/01, final on 5/09/2001[288] and of 18/04/02 (Article 41), final on 18/07/02
- 1 case against the Netherlands
H46- 31465 Sen, judgment of 21/12/01, final on 21/03/02
SUB-SECTION 5.4 – OTHER MEASURES
No new case
SECTION 6 - CASES AWAITING FOR THE PRESENTATION OF A DRAFT RESOLUTION
Action
At the time of issuing the present annotated Agenda and Order of Business, the Secretariat was preparing, in consultation with the Permanent Representations concerned, draft resolutions aiming at closing the examination of these cases. The Deputies are invited to postpone consideration of these cases to their next meeting.
Section 6
- 24 cases against Austria
H46- 29271 Dichand and others, judgment of 26/02/02, final on 26/05/02
H46- 26958 Jerusalem, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H46- 34315 Krone Verlag Gmbh and Co. Kg., judgment of 26/02/02, final on 26/05/02
H46- 34320 Freiheitliche Landesgruppe Burgenland, judgment of 18/07/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46- 28525 Unabhängige Initiative Informationsvielfalt, judgment of 26/02/02, final on 26/05/02
H54- 15153 Vereinigung Demokratischer Soldaten Österreichs and Berthold Gubi, judgment of 19/12/94
H32- 26113 Wirtschafts-Trend Zeitschriften Verlagsgesellchaft m.b.H.
H46- 36075 Siegl, judgment of 20/06/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46- 33505 H.E., judgment of 11/07/2002, final on 06/11/2002[289]
H46- 37075 Luksch, judgment of 13/12/01, final on 13/03/02
H46- 27783 T., judgment of 14/11/00
H46- 31266 G.H., judgment of 03/10/00, final on 03/01/01
H46- 26297 G.S., judgment of 21/12/99
H46- 35019 Ludescher, judgment of 20/12/01, final on 20/03/02
H46- 33915 Walder, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 17/09/01
H32- 17291 Hortolomei
H46- 37950 Franz Fischer, judgment of 29/05/01, final on 29/08/01
H46- 25878 Michael Edward Cooke, judgment of 08/02/00
H46- 30428 Beer Gertrude, judgment of 06/02/01
H46- 33382 Fischer Joseph, judgment of 17/01/02, final on 17/04/02
H46- 28501 Pobornikoff, judgment of 03/10/00
H46- 33501 Telfner, judgment of 20/03/01, final on 20/06/01
H46- 32381 Baischer, judgment of 20/12/01, final on 20/03/02
H46- 29477 Eisenstecken, judgment of 03/10/00
- 1 case against Belgium
H54- 17849 S.A. Pressos Compania Naviera and others, judgment of 20/11/95
- 2 cases against Bulgaria
H32- 30381 Mironov - Interim Resolution DH(99)352
H46- 32438 Stefanov, judgment of 03/05/01, final on 03/08/01 - Friendly settlement
- 4 cases against Cyprus
H46- 53594 Alithia Publishing Company, judgment of 11/07/2002, final on 11/10/2002
H46- 51591 Markass Car Hide Ltd, judgment of 02/07/2002, final on 06/11/2002[290]
H46- 29515 Larkos, judgment of 18/02/99
H46- 47293 Selim, judgment of 16/07/2002 - Friendly settlement
- 3 cases against the Czech Republic
H46- 33644 Cesky, judgment of 06/06/00, final on 06/09/00
H46- 31315 Punzelt, judgment of 25/04/00, final on 25/07/00
H46- 35848 Barfuss, judgment of 31/07/00, final on 31/10/00
Section 6
- 2 cases against Denmark
H46- 48470 Jensen, judgment of 14/02/02 – Friendly settlement
H46- 56811 Amrollahi, judgment of 11/07/2002, final on 11/10/2002
- 3 cases against Finland
H46- 28856 Jokela, judgment of 21/05/2002, final on 21/08/2002
H46- 25651 L., judgment of 27/04/00, final on 27/07/00
H46- 30013 Türkiye iş Bankasi, judgment of 18/06/2002, final on 18/09/2002
- 80 cases against France
H46- 25803 Selmouni, judgment of 28/07/99 - Grand Chamber
H46- 34406 Mazurek, judgment of 01/02/00, final on 01/05/00
H46- 25088 Chassagnou and others, judgment of 29/04/99
H54- 25017 Mehemi, judgment of 06/09/97
H32- 27019 Slimane-Kaïd I
H54- 23618 Lambert Michel, judgment of 24/08/98
H32- 27413 Cazes
H46- 25444 Pelissier and Sassi, judgment of 25/03/99
H46- 32872 Peltier, judgment of 21/05/2002, final on 21/08/2002
H46- 31819+ Annoni Di Gussola, Desbordes and Omer, judgment of 14/11/00, final on 14/02/01
H46- 34553 Dulaurans, judgment of 21/03/00
H32- 27659 Ferville
H32- 28845 Venot
H46- 29507 Slimane-Kaïd II, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 17/05/00[291]
H46- 27362 Voisine, judgment of 08/02/00
H46- 33933 Guisset, judgment of 26/09/00, final on 26/09/00
H54- 14032 Poitrimol, judgment of 23/11/93
H32- 17572 A.C.
H54- 25201 Guerin, judgment of 29/07/98
H46- 34791 Khalfaoui, judgment of 14/12/99, final on 14/03/00
H54- 24767 Omar, judgment of 29/07/98
H46- 31070 Van Pelt, judgment of 23/05/00, final on 23/08/00
- Length of civil proceedings
H46- 53118 Boiseau, judgment of 19/02/02, final on 19/05/02
H46- 39066 Donnadieu, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
H32- 31603 Hermant
H46- 35589 Kanoun, judgment of 03/10/00, final on 03/01/01
H46- 41943 L.L., judgment of 07/02/02, final on 07/05/02
H46- 47575 Marks and Ordinateur Express, judgment of 21/02/02, final on 21/05/02
H32- 29877 Pauchet and others - Interim Resolution DH(98)100
H32- 26496 Société Fruehauf France
- Length of proceedings before administrative courts
H54- 36313 Henra, judgment of 29/04/98
H54- 36317 Leterme, judgment of 29/04/98
H54- 32217 Pailot, judgment of 22/04/98
H54- 33441 Richard, judgment of 22/04/98
H46- 47007 Arnal, judgment of 19/03/02, final on 19/06/02
H46- 55672 Beaume Marty, judgment of 19/03/02, final on 19/06/02
Section 6
H46- 46280 Benzi, judgment of 19/03/02, final on 19/06/02
H32- 31842 Darmagnac Pierre V
H46- 38945 Francisco, judgment of 13/11/01, final on 13/02/02
H46- 49622 Goubert and Labbe, judgment of 19/03/02, final on 19/06/02
H46- 50996 Grand, judgment of 26/03/2002, final on 26/06/2002
H46- 42189 H.L., judgment of 07/02/02, final on 07/05/02
H46- 40493 Jacquie and Ledun, judgment of 28/03/00, final on 28/06/00
H46- 44617 Leray and others, judgment of 20/12/01, final on 20/03/02
H46- 42588 Linard, judgment of 25/06/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43288 Mahieu, judgment of 19/06/01
H32- 25309 Maljean
H46- 44485 Moullet, judgment of 26/03/2002, final on 26/06/2002
H46- 45573 Moyer, judgment of 25/06/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46- 41946+ Ribes J.M. and M.A., judgment of 07/05/2002, final on 07/08/2002
H46- 37565 Sapl, judgment of 18/12/01, final on 18/03/02
H46- 51818 Société Comabat, judgment of 26/03/2002, final on 26/06/2002
H46- 46708 Zaheg, judgment of 9/02/02, final on 19/05/02
- Length of proceedings before the Conseil d’Etat
H46- 38249 Arvois, judgment of 23/11/99, final on 23/02/00
H46- 28660 Ballestra, judgment of 12/12/00, final on 12/03/01
H46- 33207 Blaisot C. and M., judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00
H46- 36932 Caillot, judgment of 04/06/99, final on 04/09/99
H46- 42401 Camps, judgment of 24/10/00, final on 09/04/01
H46- 54757 Chaufour, judgment of 19/03/02, final on 19/06/02
H46- 41449 Durrand I, judgment of 13/11/01, final on 13/02/02
H46- 42038 Durrand II, judgment of 13/11/01, final on 13/02/02
H46- 30979 Frydlender, judgment of 27/06/00
H46- 48205+ Gentilhomme, Schaff-Benhadji and Zerouki, judgment of 14/05/2002, final on 14/08/2002
H46- 44066 Grass, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01
H46- 41001 Joseph-Gilbert Garcia, judgment of 26/09/00, final on 26/12/00
H46- 37387 Lambourdiere, judgment of 02/08/00, final on 02/11/00
H46- 39996 Ouendeno, judgment of 16/04/2002, final on 10/07/2002[292]
H32- 32510 Peter
H46- 33989 Thery, judgment of 01/02/00, final on 01/05/00
H46- 38042 Zanatta, A. and J.-B., judgment of 28/03/00, final on 28/06/00
- Length of proceedings before labour courts
H32- 27518 A.S.
H46- 47194 Leboeuf, judgment of 26/03/02 – Friendly settlement
H46- 38398 Leclercq, judgment of 28/11/00, final on 28/02/01
H46- 44791 Marcel, judgment of 09/04/02 – Friendly settlement
H32- 35259 Nagler
- Length of criminal proceedings
H46- 38687 Djaid, judgment of 29/09/99, final on 29/12/99
H46- 49342 Dunan, judgment of 30/10/01 – Friendly settlement
H46- 49350 Ivars, judgment of 30/10/01 – Friendly settlement
- Length of criminal proceedings combined with civil action for damages
H46- 37257 Lucas, judgment of 28/11/00, final on 28/02/01
H46- 32033 Thurin, judgment of 28/11/00, final on 28/02/01
Section 6
- 37 cases against Greece
H54- 19233+ Tsirlis and Kouloumpas, judgment of 29/05/97
H54- 24348 Grigoriades, judgment of 25/11/97
H54- 23372+ Larissis and others, judgment of 24/02/98
H54- 18748 Manoussakis and others, judgment of 25/09/96
H46- 38178 Serif, judgment of 14/12/99, final on 14/03/00
H46- 34369 Thlimmenos, judgment of 06/04/00
H46- 38703 Agoudimos and Cefallonian Sky Shipping Co., judgment of 28/06/01, final on 28/09/01
H46- 37098 Antonakopoulos, Vortsela and Antonakopoulou, judgment of 14/12/99, final on 21/03/00
H46- 43597 Dionyssios Petrotos, judgment of 29/02/00 – Friendly settlement
H54- 21522 Georgiadis Anastasios, judgment of 29/05/97
H46- 41209 Georgiadis Dimitrios, judgment of 28/03/00, final on 28/06/00
H32- 34373 Goutsos, Interim Resolution DH(99)558
H54- 18357 Hornsby, judgment of 19/03/97
H46- 31107 Iatridis, judgments of 25/03/99 and 19/10/00 (Article 41) – Grand Chamber
H46- 53478 Sajtos, judgment of 21/03/2002, final on 21/06/2002
H46- 38704 Savvidou, judgment of 01/08/00, final on 01/11/00
H32- 32397 Sinnesael, Interim Resolution DH(99)130
H46- 28802 Tsavachidis, judgment of 21/01/99
- Length of civil proceedings
H46- 30342 Academy Trading Ltd and others, judgment of 04/04/00
H46- 40434 Kosmopolis S. A., judgment of 29/03/01, final on 29/06/01
H46- 46380 LSI Information Technologies, judgment of 20/12/01, final on 20/03/02
- Length of proceedings before administrative courts
H46- 42079 E.H., judgment of 25/10/01, final on 27/03/02
H46- 41459 Fatourou, judgment of 03/08/00, final on 03/11/00
H46- 41867 Messochoritis, judgment of 12/04/01, final on 12/07/01
H54- 20323 Pafitis and others, judgment of 26/02/98
H46- 38971 Protopapa and Marangou, judgment of 28/03/00, final on 28/06/00
H32- 34569 Société anonyme Dimitrios Koutsoumbos, société technique, commerciale et touristique
H46- 47891 Spentzouris, judgment of 07/05/2002, final on 07/08/2002
H46- 40437 Tsingour, judgment of 06/07/00, final on 06/10/00
H46- 38459 Varipati, judgment of 26/10/99, final on 26/01/00
H46- 55611 Xenopoulos, judgment of 28/03/2002, final on 04/09/2002[293]
- Court of Audit
H46- 47734 Adamogiannis, judgment of 14/03/2002, final on 14/06/2002
- Length of criminal proceedings
H46- 37439 Agga, judgment of 25/01/00, final on 25/04/00
H54- 19773 Philis 2, judgment of 27/06/97
H54- 28523 Portington, judgment of 23/09/98
H32- 32857 Stamoulakatos Nicholas I
H32- 24453 Tarighi Wageh Dashti
Section 6
- 2 cases against Hungary
H46- 32396 Magyar, judgment of 11/01/01, final on 11/04/01
H46- 38937 Erdős, judgment of 09/04/2002, final on 09/07/2002
- 106 cases against Italy
H46- 41221 Troiani Marcello II, judgment of 06/12/2001, final on 10/07/2002
H32- 27253 Biasetti
H46- 44955 Mancini Vittorio and Luigi, judgment of 02/08/01, final on 12/12/01
H32- 25650 Santandrea
H46- 37019 A.M., judgment of 14/12/99, final on 14/03/00
H46- 47247 Mercuri, judgment of 11/04/02 - Friendly settlement
H46- 31227 Ambruosi, judgment of 19/10/00, final on 19/01/01
H32- 16609 Intrieri
H54- 14025 Zubani, judgments of 07/08/96 and 16/06/99
- Labour courts
H46- 43077 A.S. II, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43092 Ascierto Pietro, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43048 Bernardo, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43005 Bianchi Michele, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 38973 Borrillo, judgment of 22/06/00 – Friendly settlement
H46- 43082 C.S., judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43081 C.T., judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43073 Camerlengo, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43007 Capasso, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43008 Catillo, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43107 Circelli Maria Carmela, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 42989 Costantini, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43014 D’Errico, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43044 De Cicco Giuseppe, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43003 De Fiore, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43013 De Nunzio, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 42992 Del Grosso, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43047 Del Vecchio Edvige, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43009 Di Biase Maria, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 42991 Falzarano, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43045 Forgione, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43049 Fusco Adelia, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43104 Galietti, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43002 Giorgio Nicola, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43103 Lombardi Gianfranco and 7 others, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43105 Intorcia, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43006 La Vista, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43080 M.A.P., judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 42990 Manganiello, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 40722 Marotta, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 42988 Marucci, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 42994 Mascolo, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43046 Masella, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43001 Masuccio, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 42995 Mirra, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43071 Narciso, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
Section 6
H46- 43079 P.C. IV, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43089 Pellegrino Rossi, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43090 Perugini, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43106 Rossi Lina, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43108 Selvaggio, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43004 Verzino, judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
H46- 43078 Z., judgment of 22/06/00 - Friendly settlement
- Civil courts
H46- 44375 Rocchi Roberto, judgment of 29/03/01 - Friendly settlement
H46- 44814+ M.A. and 81 others, judgment of 30/11/00 - Friendly settlement
- Administrative courts
H46- 44344 Marcotrigiano, judgment of 19/12/00 - Friendly settlement
- Court of Audit
H46- 54288 Andreozzi, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46- 54297 Aniceto, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46- 44365 Calvani, judgment of 21/11/00, final on 21/02/01
H46- 41829 Campomizzi, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00
H46- 54291 Caproni, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46- 41833 Cardillo, judgment of 28/04/00, final on 28/07/00
H46- 54309 Carretta, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46- 54313 Castiello, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46- 54292 Cerasomma, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46- 54290+ D'Agostino Francesco, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46- 41821 Delicata, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00
H46- 44370 D’Innella, judgment of 21/11/00, final on 21/02/01
H46- 54294 Fiore Mario, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46- 44367 G.G. IV, judgment of 21/11/00, final on 21/02/01
H46- 54280 Giordano, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46- 54302 Incollingo, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46- 54301 Jaculli, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46- 54296 Manera, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46- 54306 Masia, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46- 54308 Mignanelli, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46- 44369 Pe.C., judgment of 21/11/00, final on 21/02/01
H46- 54318 Picano, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46- 41831 Pio, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00
H46- 54279 Prete, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46- 54314 Quacquarelli, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46- 41819 Quinci, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00
H46- 54284 Radicchi, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46- 41830 Raglione, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00
H46- 54298 Sabetta, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46- 44368 Sapia, judgment of 21/11/00, final on 21/02/01
H46- 41820 Sinagoga, judgment of 28/04/00, final on 28/07/00
H46- 54311 Soave, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46- 54303 Spatrisano, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46- 54305 Tamburrini, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46- 54285 Tatangelo, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46- 54315 Tortolani, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46- 41837 Trotta, judgment of 08/02/00, final on 08/05/00
H46- 54295 Trovato, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
Section 6
H46- 41841 Vay, judgment of 28/04/00, final on 28/07/00
H46- 41818 Vero, judgment of 28/04/00, final on 28/07/00
H46- 54317 Zullo Rocco, judgment of 28/03/02, final on 28/06/02
H46- 44362 Di Deco, judgment of 12/04/01 – Friendly settlement
H46- 44401 Fermi and others, judgment of 06/11/01 – Friendly settlement
- Failure to enforce judicial eviction orders against tenants
H46- 33966 Bastreghi, judgment of 03/12/01 – Friendly settlement
H46- 32363 Bertini, judgment of 03/12/01 – Friendly settlement
H46- 38415 C.M.F., judgment of 18/07/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46- 37242 Caramanti, judgment of 03/12/01 – Friendly settlement
H46- 39797 Guazzone, judgment of 11/07/2002 - Friendly settlement (rectified on 01/08/2002)
H46- 35243 N. and D.A., judgment of 18/07/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46- 31259 Rizzi, judgment of 03/12/01 – Friendly settlement
H46- 37248 Vietti, judgment of 18/07/2002 - Friendly settlement
- 1 case against Latvia
H46- 50108 Kulakova, judgment of 18/10/01 – Friendly settlement
- 7 cases against Lithuania
H46- 37975 Graužinis, judgment of 10/10/00, final on 10/01/01
H46- 36743 Grauslys, judgment of 10/10/00, final on 10/01/01
H46- 34578 Jėčius, judgment of 31/07/00
H46- 47679 Stašaitis, judgment of 21/03/2002, final on 21/06/2002
H46- 42095 Daktaras, judgment of 10/10/00, final on 18/01/01
H46- 44558 Valašinas, judgment of 24/07/01, final on 24/10/01
H46- 44800 Puzinas, judgment of 14/03/02, final on 14/06/02
- 3 cases against Luxembourg
H46- 41761 Scheele, judgment of 17/05/01, final on 17/08/01
H46- 21156 G.J., judgment of 26/10/00
H46- 45165 Matthies-Lenzen, judgment of 05/02/02 – Friendly settlement
- 7 cases against the Netherlands
H32- 14084 R.V. and others - Interim Resolution DH(2000)25
H46- 28369 Camp and Bourimi, judgment of 03/10/00
H46- 29192 Ciliz, judgment of 11/07/00
H46- 31725 Köksal, judgment of 20/03/01 – Friendly settlement
H46- 33258 Holder, judgment of 05/06/01 – Friendly settlement
H46- 36499 Samy, judgment of 18/06/2002 - Friendly settlement
H46- 34549 Meulendijks, judgment of 14/05/2002, final on 14/08/2002
- 6 cases against Poland
H46- 28358 Baranowski, judgment of 28/03/00
H46- 31382 Kurzac, judgment of 22/02/01, final on 22/05/01
H46- 38670 Dewicka, judgment of 04/04/00, final on 04/07/00
H46- 51669 Pałys, judgment of 11/12/01 – Friendly settlement
H46- 25874 Kawka, judgment of 09/01/01
H46- 33310 H.D., judgment of 20/06/2002 - Friendly settlement
Section 6
- 4 cases against Portugal
H46- 37698 Lopes Gomes da Silva, judgment of 28/09/00, final on 28/12/00
H46- 37528 Martins and Garcia Alves, judgment of 16/11/00, final on 16/02/01
H54- 15777 Matos and Silva and 2 others, judgment of 16/09/96
H46- 33290 Salgueiro Da Silva Mouta, judgment of 21/12/99, final on 21/03/00
- 1 case against Romania
H32- 32922 C.C.M.C., Interim Resolution DH(99)333
- 7 cases against the Slovak Republic
H46- 34753 Jóri, judgment of 09/11/00, final on 09/02/01
H46- 40345 Stančiak, judgment of 12/04/01, final on 12/07/01
H46- 29032 Feldek, judgment of 12/07/01, final on 12/10/01
H46- 32686 Marônek, judgment of 19/04/01, final on 19/07/01
H46- 46843 Remšíková, judgment of 17/05/01 - Friendly settlement
H46- 24530 Vodeničarov, judgment of 21/12/00
H46- 38794 J.K., judgment of 23/07/2002 - Friendly settlement
- 2 cases against Slovenia
H46- 29462 Rehbock, judgment of 28/11/00
H46- 28400 Majarič, judgment of 08/02/00
- 4 cases against Sweden
H46- 26978 Beck, judgment of 09/01/01 - Friendly settlement
H46- 28222 Muonio Saami Village, judgment of 09/01/01 - Friendly settlement
H46- 32531 Jakola, judgment of 06/03/01 – Friendly settlement
H46- 30526 De Laczay Ervin and Olga, judgment of 24/09/2002 - Friendly settlement
- 12 cases against Switzerland
H46- 27154 D.N., judgment of 29/03/01 - Grand Chamber
H46- 33958 Wettstein, judgment of 21/12/00, final on 21/03/01
H46- 27798 Amann, judgment of 16/02/00 - Grand Chamber
H54- 23224 Kopp, judgment of 25/03/98
H46- 54273 Boultif, judgment of 02/08/01, final on 02/11/01
H46- 24699 VGT Verein Gegen Tierfabriken, judgment of 28/06/01, final on 28/09/01
H46- 37292 F.R., judgment of 28/06/01, final on 28/09/01
H46- 33499 Ziegler, judgment of 21/02/02, final on 21/05/02
H46- 27426 G.B., judgment of 30/11/00, final on 01/03/01
H46- 28256 M.B., judgment of 30/11/00, final on 01/03/01
H32- 27613 P.B., Interim Resolution ResDH(2000)83
H54- 19800 R.M.D., judgment of 26/09/97 - Interim Resolution DH(99)678
- 113 cases against Turkey
H46- 29921 Büker, judgment of 24/10/00, final on 24/01/01
H46- 31312 Eğinlioğlu, judgment of 20/12/01 – Friendly settlement
H46- 29851 Zana, judgment of 06/03/01, final on 06/06/01
H46- 29295+ Ecer and Zeyrek, judgment of 27/02/01, final on 27/05/01
Section 6
H46- 34686 Sürek Kamil Tekin, judgment of 14/06/01 - Friendly settlement
H46- 29495 Erdemli, judgment of 30/10/01, final on 30/10/01
H46- 35980 Z.E., judgment of 07/06/01 - Friendly settlement
H46- 31882 Çakmak, judgment of 10/07/01 – Friendly settlement
H46- 24947 Ekinci Lalihan, judgment of 05/06/01 - Friendly settlement
H46- 31849 İşçi, judgment of 25/09/01 - Friendly settlement
H46- 24937 Koç Fırat, judgment of 05/06/01 - Friendly settlement
H46- 24933 Kürküt, judgment of 10/07/01 – Friendly settlement
H46- 31733 Tuncay and Ozlem Kaya, judgment of 08/11/01 - Friendly settlement
H46- 28011 Yeşiltepe, judgment of 10/07/01 – Friendly settlement
H46- 32983 Çavuşoğlu, judgment of 06/03/01 - Friendly settlement
H46- 31249 Gündüz and others, judgment of 14/11/01 – Friendly settlement
H46- 24932 Kaplan, judgment of 26/02/02 – Friendly settlement
H46- 24669 Karataş and Boğa, judgment of 17/10/00 - Friendly settlement
- Length of detention on remand
H46- 29862 Bağci and Murğ, judgment of 10/07/01 – Friendly settlement
H46- 32450 Çaloğlu, judgment of 10/07/01 – Friendly settlement
H46- 31896 Değerli, judgment of 22/05/01 - Friendly settlement
H46- 29866+ Demir C., Demir M. and Gül, judgment of 10/07/01 – Friendly settlement
H46- 29883+ Fidan, Çağro and Özarslaner, judgment of 10/07/01 – Friendly settlement
H46- 31787 Göktaş and others, judgment of 25/09/01 - Friendly settlement
H46- 31850 Günay and others, judgment of 27/09/01, final on 27/12/01
H46- 28013+ Karatepe and Kırt, judgment of 17/07/01 – Friendly settlement
H46- 34499 Kortak, judgment of 31/05/01 - Friendly settlement
H46- 31895 Morsümbül, judgment of 25/09/01 - Friendly settlement
H46- 30495 Mutlu and Yildiz, judgment of 10/07/01 – Friendly settlement
H46- 28014+ Okuyucu, Kara and Bilmen, judgment of 17/07/01 - Friendly settlement
H46- 30453 Özata and others, judgment of 22/05/01 - Friendly settlement
H46- 29425 Özçelik and others, judgment of 10/07/01 - Friendly settlement
H46- 36760 Şanlı and Erol, judgment of 22/05/01 - Friendly settlement
H46- 37191 Yildirim and others, judgment of 25/09/01 - Friendly settlement
H46- 34684 Yolcu, judgment of 05/02/02 – Friendly settlement
- Delays by the administration in paying additional compensation for expropriation and the applicable rate of default interest
H46- 19640 Akça Halim, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01
H46- 19641 Akçay Mehmet, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01
H46- 19642 Akkaya Ahmet, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01
H46- 19643 Akkaya İbrahim, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01
H46- 19644 Akkaya Mustafa, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01
H46- 19264 Aktaş and others, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01
H32- 22907 Atatür A. and M., and Pamir
H46- 19645 Balci Hüseyin, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01
H46- 19646 Balci Macit, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01
H46- 19647 Baltekin Bilge, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01
H46- 19266 Baltekin, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01
H46- 19648 Başar Halil, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01
H46- 19649 Başar Talip, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01
H46- 19653 Bilgiç Yusuf, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01
H46- 19650 Bilgin Ahmet, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01
H46- 20132 Bilgin Burhan, judgment of 20/06/2002, final on 20/09/2002
H46- 20133 Bilgin Leyli, judgment of 20/06/2002, final on 20/09/2002
H46- 19651 Bilgin Mahmut, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01
H46- 19267 Bilgin Mehmet and others, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01
Section 6
H46- 19652 Bilgin Mehmet II, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01
H46- 20134 Bilgin Münir, judgment of 20/06/2002, final on 20/09/2002
H46- 19268 Bilgin Saniye and others, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01
H46- 19269 Bozkurt and others, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01
H46- 19272 Çalkan and others, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01
H46- 19661 Çalkan Gülnahar, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01
H46- 19662 Çalkan Rabia, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01
H46- 19665 Çalkan Seyfettin, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01
H46- 20136 Canlı, judgment of 20/06/2002, final on 20/09/2002
H46- 19663 Çapar Ekrem, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01
H46- 19666 Çapar Nuri, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01
H46- 19273 Çapar, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01
H46- 19664 Çelebi Hamdi, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01
H46- 19274 Çelebi Hamdi, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01
H46- 19275 Çelebi Yusuf, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01
H46- 19276 Çiplak and others, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01
H46- 19668 Dalgiç Hayrettin, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01
H46- 19669 Dalgiç Necati, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01
H46- 19277 Daniş, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01
H46- 19654 Dinç Fethiye, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01
H46- 19670 Dişçi Dursun, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01
H46- 19671 Dişçi Hasan, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01
H46- 19672 Dişçi Osman, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01
H46- 19655 Dokel Ünzile, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01
H46- 19656 Eğrikale Saadettin, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01
H46- 19657 Erol Naside II, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01
H46- 19658 Erol Recep, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01
H46- 19659 Erol Sefer, judgment of 03/07/01, final on 03/10/01
H46- 19278 Erol, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01
H46- 19280 Gökgöz, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01
H46- 19281 Gökmen and others, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01
H46- 20142 Günal Kazım, judgment of 20/06/2002, final on 20/09/2002
H46- 19673 Güneysu Davut, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01
H46- 19270 Ilhan Buzcu and others, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01
H46- 19283 Işik Ayşe and others, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01
H46- 19284 Işik Yilmaz and others, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01
H46- 19286 Karabulut Sefer, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01
H46- 19674 Kartal Ali, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01
H46- 19675 Koç Hasan, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01
H46- 19676 Koçer Ayse, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01
H46- 19271 Nuriye Buzcu, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01
H46- 30448 Önel Ahmet, judgment of 23/05/2002, final on 23/08/2002
H46- 30948 Önel Mehmet, judgment of 23/05/2002, final on 23/08/2002
H46- 30446 Önel Temur, judgment of 23/05/2002, final on 23/08/2002
H46- 30447 Özel Hacı Bayram, judgment of 23/05/2002, final on 23/08/2002
H46- 31964 Özel Hacı Osman, judgment of 23/05/2002, final on 23/08/2002
H46- 19287 Özen, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01
H46- 19288 Öztekin, judgment of 30/01/01, final on 30/04/01
H46- 19678 Öztürk Ali, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01
H46- 19679 Öztürk Gülfiye, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01
H46- 19681 Öztürk Kamil, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01
H46- 19682 Öztürk Muhsin, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01
H46- 19683 Öztürk Mustafa, judgment of 05/06/01, final on 05/09/01
H46- 20153 Şen Ismet, judgment of 20/06/2002, final on 20/09/2002
Section 6
H46- 20156 Şen Kemal, judgment of 20/06/2002, final on 20/09/2002
H46- 20154 Şen Mahmut, judgment of 20/06/2002, final on 20/09/2002
H46- 20158 Taşdemir Mehmet n° 2, judgment of 20/06/2002, final on 20/09/2002
H46- 38931 İ.S., judgment of 28/03/02 – Friendly settlement
H46- 33322 Özdiler and Bakan, judgment of 27/06/2002 - Friendly settlement
- 16 cases against the-United Kingdom
H46- 48521 Armstrong, judgment of 16/07/2002, final on 16/10/2002
H46- 24724 T., judgment of 16/12/99 - Grand Chamber
H46- 24888 V., judgment of 16/12/99 - Grand Chamber
H46- 45276 Hilal, judgment of 06/03/01, final on 06/06/01
H54- 24839 Bowman, judgment of 19/02/98
H32- 27237 Govell
H32- 26109 Santa Cruz Ruiz
H54- 24838 Steel, Lush, Needham, Polden and Cole, judgment of 23/09/98
H46- 35394 Khan, judgment of 12/05/00, final on 05/10/00
H46- 28901 Rowe and Davis, judgment of 16/02/00
H46- 35718 Condron, judgment of 02/05/00, final on 02/08/00
H46- 33274 Foxley, judgment of 20/06/00, final on 20/09/00
H46- 39360 S.B.C., judgment of 19/06/01, final on 19/09/01
H54- 20605 Halford, judgment of 25/06/97 - Interim Resolution DH(1999)725
H46- 36670 Duyonov and others, judgment of 02/10/01 – Friendly settlement
H46- 40302 Matthews Michael, judgment of 15/07/2002 - Friendly settlement
c. PREPARATION OF THE NEXT DH MEETING
(841st MEETING, 3-4 June 2003)
(See Addendum Preparation of the next meeting)
Action
The Deputies are invited to approve the preliminary lists of items to be examined at the next DH meeting, which appears in Addendum Preparation of the next meeting to the present annotated agenda and order of business.
[1] Following a decision taken by the Deputies on 26 February 2001 these Rules are also applicable to the control of execution of cases decided by the Committee of Ministers itself under the former Article 32 of the Convention or transmitted to the Committee by the European Court of Human Rights pursuant to former Article 54 of the Convention (as worded before the entry into force of Protocol N° 11 on 1 November 1998).
[2] Certain cases may be registered in two different sections.
[3] Cases decided by the Committee itself under the former Article 32 of the Convention (the last decision on a violation of the Convention pursuant to this procedure was taken at the 741st meeting in February 2001).
[4] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[5] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[6] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[7] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[8] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[9] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[10] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[11] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[12] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[13] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[14] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[15] The Secretariat proposes to postpone the examination of this case pending the outcome of the revision proceedings before the Court.
[16] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[17] This case also appears under Sub-Section 4.2.
[18] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[19] This case also appears under Sub-Section 5.3.
[20] This case also appears under Section 4.2, together with the Immobilare Saffi case.
[21] These cases will also appear under Sub-section 4.3, see Appendix to the present document.
[22] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[23] These cases will also appear under Sub-section 4.3, see Appendix to the present document.
[24] These cases will also appear under Sub-section 4.3, see Appendix to the present document.
[25] These cases will also appear under Sub-section 4.3, see Appendix to the present document.
[26] This case will also appear under Sub-section 4.3, see Appendix to the present document.
[27] This case will also appear under Sub-section 4.2.
[28] This case also appears under Sub-Section 4.3.
[29] These cases will also appear under Sub-section 4.3, Appendix to the present document.
[30] A part of the just satisfaction (see revised judgment) will be subsequently supervised.
[31] These cases will also appear under Sub-Section 4.3, see Appendix to the present document.
[32] These cases will also appear under Sub-Section 4.3, see Appendix to the present document.
[33] These cases will also appear under Sub-Section 4.3, see Appendix to the present document.
[34] These cases will also appear under Sub-section 4.3, see Appendix to the present document.
[35] This case also appears under Sub-Section 5.1.
[36] This case also appears under Sub-Section 5.1.
[37] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[38] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[39] This case also appears under Sub-Section 4.2, freedom of expression cases.
[40] This case also appears under Sub-Section 4.2, freedom of expression cases.
[41] This case also appears under Sub-Section 4.2.
[42] This case also appears under Sub-Section 4.2.
[43] This case also appears under Sub-Section 4.2.
[44] This case also appears under Sub-Section 4.2.
[45] This case also appears under Sub-Section 4.2.
[46] This case also appears under Sub-Section 4.2.
[47] These cases will also appear under Sub-section 4.3, see Appendix to the present document.
[48] These cases also appear in Sub-Section 4.3, see Appendix to the present document.
[49] This case also appears in Sub-Section 4.3, see Appendix to the present document.
[50] The time-limit of 12/08/2002 only applies to the following applicants: Gennaro Frattini, Mario Marra, Pasquale Mele and Elia Longobardo. For Mr Lombardo’s heirs, the time-limit for payment has not expired (26/05/2003).
[51] This case also appears in Sub-Section 5.1.
[52]This case also appears in Sub-Section 4.3.
[53]This case also appears in Sub-Section 4.2, freedom of expression cases.
[54] This case also appears in Sub-Section 4.2.
[55] This case also appears in Sub-Section 4.2.
[56] This case also appears in Sub-Section 4.2.
[57] This case also appears in Sub-Section 4.2.
[58] Revised judgment on just satisfaction / Arrêt révisé sur la satisfaction équitable.
[59] This case also appears in Sub-Section 4.2, freedom of expression cases.
[60] This case also appears in Sub-Section 4.2, freedom of expression cases.
[61] This case also appears in Sub-Section 4.2, freedom of expression cases.
[62] This case also appears in Sub-Section 4.2, freedom of expression cases.
[63] This case also appears in Sub-Section 4.2, freedom of expression cases.
[64] Inclusion of cases in this Section does not exclude the possibility that general measures may be examined at subsequent meetings.
[65] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[66] The Secretariat proposes to postpone the examination of this case at the 834th meeting (9-10 April 2003).
[67] This case also appears in Section 3.a
[68] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[69] The Secretariat proposes to postpone the examination of this case at the 834th meeting (9-10 April 2003).
[70] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[71] This case also appears in Section 3.a.
[72] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[73] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[74] This case also appears in Section 3.c.
[75] This case also appears in Section 3.c.
[76] This case also appears in Section 3.c.
[77] This case also appears in Section 3.b.
[78] This case also appears in Section 3.c.
[79] This case also appears in Section 3.a.
[80] This case also appears in Section 3.a.
[81] Furthermore, in the Başkaya & Okçuoğlu case, the sentence imposed on the second applicant was not provided by law (violation of Article 7). Nine of these cases also concern the independence and impartiality of State Security Courts (violation of Article 6§1) and measures have already been adopted in order to solve this problem, thus preventing new similar violations.
[82] In the National Programme of reforms established within the framework of Turkey’s candidature to accession to the European Union communicated in writing to all Delegations on 28 March 2001.
[83] This case also appears in Section 3.c.
[84] This case also appears in Section 3.a.
[85] This case also appears in Section 3.a.
[86] This case also appears in Section 3.a.
[87] This case also appears in Section 3.a.
[88] This case also appears in Section 3.a.
[89] This case also appears in Section 3.b.
[90] This case also appears in Section 3.b.
[91] This case also appears in Section 3.b.
[92] This case also appears in Section 3.b.
[93] This case also appears in Section 3.a.
[94] This case also appears in Section 3.a.
[95] A full list of the Italian cases including those which appear in Section 3 will appear in Appendix to the Annotated Agenda and Order of Business.
[96] This case also appears in Section 3.b
[97] This case also appears in Section 3.a.
[98] The Secretariat proposes to postpone the examination of these cases to the 834th meeting (9-10 April 2003).
[99] This case also appears in Section 3.b.
[100] This case also appears in Section 3.a.
[101] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[102] This case also appears in Section 3.a.
[103] Date of the dismissed of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[104] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[105] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[106] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[107] The cases in bold also appear in Section 3.
[108] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[109] A part of the just satisfaction (see revised judgment) will be subsequently supervised.
[110] This case appeared in Secton 3.a at the 810th meeting. The Court subsequently delivered a revised judgment on just satisfaction which will become final on 01/01/2003. Thus this case will appear again in Section 3.a at the 834th meeting (April 2003).
[111] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[112] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[113] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[114] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[115] This case will be subsequently examined in Section 3.a following the revised judgment on just satisfaction.
[116] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[117] This case appeared in Secton 3.a at the 819th meeting. The Court subsequently delivered a revised judgment on just satisfaction which will become final on 28/02/2003. Thus this case will appear again in Section 3.a at the 841st meeting (June 2003).
[118] The time-limit of 12/08/2002 only applies to the following applicants: Gennaro Frattini, Mario Marra, Pasquale Mele and Elia Longobardo. For Mr Lombardo’s heirs, the time-limit for payment has not expired (26/05/2003).
[119]The case will be examined in Section 3.a at the 841st meeting (3-4 June 2003) following the revised judgment on just satisfaction.
[120] The case will be examined in Section 3.a at the 841st meeting (3-4 June 2003) following the revised judgment on just satisfaction.
[121] The case will be examined in Section 3.a at the 841st meeting (3-4 June 2003) following the revised judgment on just satisfaction.
[122] This case appeared in Secton 3.a at the 810th meeting. The Court subsequently delivered a revised judgment on just satisfaction which will become final on 07/02/2003. Thus this case will appear again in Section 3.a at the 841st meeting (June 2003).
[123] Following a decision taken by the Deputies on 26 February 2001 these Rules are also applicable to the control of execution of cases decided by the Committee of Ministers itself under the former Article 32 of the Convention or transmitted to the Committee by the European Court of Human Rights pursuant to former Article 54 of the Convention (as worded before the entry into force of Protocol N° 11 on 1 November 1998).
[124] Certain cases may be registered in two different sections.
[125] Cases decided by the Committee itself under the former Article 32 of the Convention (the last decision on a violation of the Convention pursuant to this procedure was taken at the 741st meeting in February 2001).
[126] At that date, the parties notified the Court that they would not seise the Grand Chamber.
[127] These cases also appear in Sub-section 5.1
[128] At that date, the parties notified the Court that they would not seise the Grand Chamber.
[129] This case also appears in sub-section 4.1
[130] This case also appears in sub-section 4.2
[131] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[132] This case also appears in sub-section 4.2
[133] This case also appears in sub-section 4.1
[134] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[135] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[136] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[137] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[138] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[139] This case also appears in sub-section 4.2.
[140] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[141] This case also appears in sub-Section 4.2
[142] This case also appears in sub-Section 4.1
[143] These cases also appear in sub-Section 4.3
[144] This case also appears in sub-Section 4.2
[145] A part of the just satisfaction (see revised judgment) will be subject to supervision later.
[146] These cases also appear in sub-Section 4.3
[147] This case also appears in Sub-Section 5.1.
[148] This case also appears in Sub-Section 5.1.
[149] This case also appears in Sub-Section 5.1.
[150] This case also appears in sub-Section 4.2
[151] This case also appears in sub-Section 4.2
[152] This case also appears in sub-Section 4.2
[153] This case also appears in sub-Section 4.2
[154] This case also appears in sub-Section 4.2
[155] This case also appears in sub-Section 4.2
[156] This case also appears in sub-Section 4.2
[157] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[158] This case also appears in sub-Section 4.2
[159] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[160] This case also appears in sub-Section 4.2
[161] This case also appears in sub-Section 4.2
[162] This case also appears in sub-Section 4.2
[163] This case also appears in sub-Section 4.2, Action of the security forces.
[164] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[165] This case also appears in sub-Section 4.2, Action of the security forces.
[166] These cases also appear in sub-Section 4.2.
[167] This case also appears in sub-Section 4.2, Action of the security forces.
[168] This case also appears in Sub-Section 4.2.
[169] This case also appears in Sub-Section 4.2.
[170] This case also appears in Sub-Section 4.2.
[171] These cases also appear in sub-Section 4.3
[172] The time-limit of 12/08/2002 only applies to the following applicants: Gennaro Frattini, Mario Marra, Pasquale Mele and Elia Longobardo. For Mr Lombardo’s heirs, the time-limit for payment has not expired (26/05/2003).
[173] This case also appears in Sub-Section 5.1.
[174] This case also appears in sub-Section 4.2, Action of the security forces.
[175] This case also appears in Sub-Section 4.2.
[176] This case also appears in Sub-Section 4.2.
[177] This case also appears in Sub-Section 4.2.
[178] This case also appears in Sub-Section 4.2.
[179] This case also appears in sub-Section 4.2, Action of the security forces.
[180] This case also appears in sub-Section 4.2, Action of the security forces.
[181] This case also appears in sub-Section 4.2, Action of the security forces.
[182] This case also appears in sub-Section 4.2, Action of the security forces.
[183] This case also appears in sub-Section 4.2, Action of the security forces.
[184] This case also appears in sub-Section 4.2, Action of the security forces.
[185] This case also appears in sub-Section 4.2, Action of the security forces.
[186] This case also appears in sub-Section 4.2, Action of the security forces.
[187] This case also appears in sub-Section 4.2, Action of the security forces.
[188] This case also appears in sub-Section 4.2, Action of the security forces.
[189] This case also appears in sub-Section 4.2, Action of the security forces.
[190] This case also appears in sub-Section 4.2, Action of the security forces.
[191] This case also appears in sub-Section 4.2, Action of the security forces.
[192] This case also appears in sub-Section 4.2, Action of the security forces.
[193] This case also appears in sub-Section 4.2, Action of the security forces.
[194] This case also appears in sub-Section 4.2, Action of the security forces.
[195] This case also appears in sub-Section 4.2, Action of the security forces.
[196] This case also appears in sub-Section 4.2, Action of the security forces.
[197] This case also appears in sub-Section 4.2, Action of the security forces.
[198] This case also appears in sub-Section 4.2, Action of the security forces.
[199] This case also appears in sub-Section 4.2, Action of the security forces.
[200] This case also appears in sub-Section 4.2, Action of the security forces.
[201] This case also appears in sub-Section 4.2, Action of the security forces.
[202] This case also appears in sub-Section 4.2, Action of the security forces.
[203] Inclusion of cases in this Section does not exclude the possibility that general measures may be examined at subsequent meetings.
[204] This case also appears in sub-Section 3.a
[205] This case also appears in sub-Section 3.a
[206] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[207] This case also appears in sub-Section 3.a
[208] This case also appears in Sub-Section 3.a
[209] This case also appears in Sub-Section 3.a
[210] This case also appears in sub-section 3.a
[211] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[212] The Secretariat proposes to postpone this case to the 841st meeting (3-4 June 2003) (DH)
[213] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[214] This case also appears in sub-Section 3.a
[215] This case also appears in sub-Section 3.a
[216] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[217] This case also appears in sub-Section 3.a
[218] This case also appears in sub-Section 3.a
[219] This case also appears in sub-Section 3.a
[220] This case also appears in sub-Section 3.a
[221] This case also appears in sub-Section 3.a
[222] This case also appears in sub-Section 3.a
[223] This case also appears in sub-Section 3.a
[224] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[225] This case also appears in sub-Section 3.a
[226] This case also appears in sub-section 3.a
[227] This case also appears in sub-Section 3.a
[228] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[229] This case also appears in sub-Section 3.a
[230] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[231] This case also appears in sub-Section 3.c
[232] This case also appears in sub-Section 3.c.
[233] This case also appears in sub-Section 3.c
[234] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[235] This case also appears in sub-Section 3.c.
[236] This case also appears in sub-Section 3.c.
[237] This case also appears in sub-Section 3.c
[238] This case also appears in sub-Section 3.c
[239] This case also appears in sub-Section 3.c.
[240] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[241] This case also appears in sub-Section 3.b
[242] This case also appears in sub-Section 3.c
[243] This case also appears in sub-Section 3.a
[244] This case also appears in sub-Section 3.c.
[245] This case also appears in sub-Section 3.c.
[246] This case also appears in sub-Section 3.c
[247] This case also appears in sub-Section 3.c
[248] This case also appears in sub-Section 3.c.
[249] This case also appears in sub-Section 3.c.
[250] This case also appears in sub-Section 3.c.
[251] This case also appears in sub-Section 3.c.
[252] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[253] This case also appears in sub-Section 3.a
[254] This case also appears in sub-Section 3.c.
[255] This case also appears in sub-Section 3.c
[256] This case also appears in sub-Section 3.a
[257] This case also appears in sub-Section 3.c.
[258] This case also appears in sub-Section 3.c
[259] This case also appears in sub-Section 3.c.
[260] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[261] This case also appears in sub-Section 3.c.
[262] This case also appears in sub-Section 3.c
[263] This case also appears in sub-Section 3.a
[264] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[265] This case also appears in sub-Section 3.a.
[266] This case also appears in sub-Section 3.a
[267] This case also appears in sub-Section 3.a
[268] This case also appears in sub-Section 3.a
[269] This case also appears in sub-Section 3.a
[270] This case also appears in sub-Section 3.a
[271] This case also appears in sub-Section 3.a
[272] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[273] This case also appears in sub-Section 3.a.
[274] This case also appears in sub-Section 3.a.
[275] This case also appears in sub-Section 3.a.
[276] This case also appears in Sub-Section 3.b.
[277] This case also appears in Sub-Section 3.b.
[278] This case also appears in Sub-Section 3.b.
[279] This case also appears in Sub-Section 3.b.
[280] The cases in bold also appear in Section 3.
[281] This case also appears in sub-section 3.b
[282] This case also appears in Sub-Section 3.a.
[283] This case also appears in sub-section 3.a
[284] This case also appears in Section 2
[285] This case also appears in Section 2
[286] This case also appears in sub-section 3.a.
[287] This case also appears in Section 2
[288] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[289] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[290] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[291] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.
[292] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber
[293] Date of the dismissal of the request for a re-hearing before the Grand Chamber.