Information Documents

SG/Com(2003)844(restricted)      19 June 2003


————————————————
Communication by the Secretary General

and the Deputy Secretary General

to the 844th meeting of the

Ministers’ Deputies


————————————————

List of items

Communication by the Secretary General

1.     Meeting of the Ministers for Foreign Affairs of members States of the Central European Initiative (CEI) at the invitation of the Minister for Foreign Affairs of Poland, Wroclaw, Poland, 12-13 June 2003

2.   Conference of leaders of Islamic Centres and Ulemas in Europe” focusing on the development of Islam in the European context, at the invitation of the Minister for Foreign Affairs of Austria, Graz, Austria, 13 June 2003

3.     Voluntary contributions

4.     Future visits

Communication by the Deputy Secretary General

         

1.     7th Conference of European Health Ministers on “Health, Dignity and Human Rights”, Oslo, Norway, 12-13 June 2003

2.   Future visits


Communication by the Secretary General

1.   Meeting of the Ministers for Foreign Affairs of members States of the Central European Initiative (CEI) at the invitation of the Minister for Foreign Affairs of Poland, Wroclaw, Poland, 12-13 June 2003

I participated in the CEI ministerial meeting in Wroclaw, Poland. The text of my speech is attached as Appendix I. In the context of the meeting, I had bilateral meetings with the Foreign Minister of Poland, Mr Cimoszewicz and the Romanian Secretary of State, Mr Petre Ciamba. I also had to opportunity to meet the co-ordinator of the Stability Pact, Mr Busek and several other participants.

Our discussions focused on the role of the Council of Europe in enlarged Europe and the third summit of the Council of Europe.

I should like to thank the Polish authorities for their warm hospitality and the excellent organisation of the conference.


2.    “Conference of leaders of Islamic Centres and Ulemas in Europe” focusing on the development of Islam in the European context, at the invitation of the Minister for Foreign Affairs of Austria, Graz, Austria, 13 June 2003

I addressed the Graz Conference of leaders of Islamic centres and Ulemas in Europe on “the role of Islam and Muslims in Europe”, at the invitation of the Austrian Foreign Minister, Mrs Benita Ferrero-Waldner, on 13 June 2003.

This event was organised at the initiative of the Grand Mufty of Bosnia Herzegovina, Mr Mustafa Ceric, with the support of the Austrian Foreign Ministry and the Islamic Religious Community in Austria. More than a hundred presidents of cultural centres and Islamic associations, theologians and imams of mosques from all over Europe participated in the Conference.

The main objective was to reflect on the place Muslims should occupy in European society. It was also to exchange views on the role of Islamic communities and institutions in highlighting the vision of Islam.

The majority of participants promoted a modern vision of Islam more compatible with the European environment and appealed for the reinforcement of the European identity of Muslims living in Europe. The importance of interfaith dialogue was also particularly underlined, especially in Europe, which is, by definition, multinational, multiethnic and multireligious.

During the Conference, I met the Secretary General of the Organisation of the Islamic Conference, Dr Abdelouahed Belkeziz. We discussed possible ways of developing co-operation between our two organisations.

My speech at the opening ceremony appears as Appendix II.

I should like to thank the organisers and the Austrian authorities for their warm welcome and the excellent organisation of the Conference.

      

 


3.    Voluntary contributions

I should like to thank the following authorities for their voluntary contributions towards the Council of Europe In-Service Training Programme for Educational Staff:

Cyprus: € 2 300

Germany: € 50 000

Finland: € 18 000

The Netherlands: € 6 998.20

Sweden: € 19 125

Switzerland: € 20 602.58

I should also like to thank the Swiss authorities for their voluntary contribution of SFR 44 250 towards the library of the European Court of Human Rights.


4.        Future visits

Dornbirn, Austria: Opening of the Museum of Natural History, 20 June 2003

Wachau, Austria: Europaforum “Die Zukunft der Europäischen Union : Neue Chancen durch innere Reform und Erweiterung”, 28 June 2003

Crans Montana, Switzerland: Crans Montana Forum – meeting of Central European Heads of State and Government on the subject “Towards an active and modern Democracy”, 29 June 2003

The Hague, Netherlands: official contacts (chairmanship of the Committee of Ministers), 2 July 2003

San Marino: official visit, 3-4 July 2003


Communication from the Deputy Secretary General

1.     7th Conference of European Health Ministers on “Health, Dignity and Human Rights”, Oslo, Norway, 12-13 June 2003

On 12 June I opened and attended the Seventh Conference of European Health Ministers, which was held in Oslo on 12 and 13 June 2003.

The Conference aimed at intensifying the social, ethical and human rights dimensions of health care. One of the main challenges would be to ensure that vulnerable groups, such as the elderly and socially marginalised, receive the health care to which they are entitled. In my speech, attached as Appendix III, I emphasised the human rights’ dimension of health policies and recalled that “the Council of Europe offers the ideal platform for the creation of a greater Europe of health and social cohesion, capable of meeting the needs of the entire continent”.

I had an exchange of views with the State Secretary of Foreign Affairs, Mrs Thorhild Widvey, as well as with the Minster of Health, Mr Dagfinn Hoybråten and the Minister of Justice, Mr Odd Einar Dorum.

My Norwegian interlocutors were very interested in giving high priority to a Council of Europe Convention to combat trafficking in human beings. It was felt that the fight against trafficking in organs could also be usefully tackled by the Council of Europe by means of a legal instrument.

We discussed in depth the upcoming Committee of Ministers Chairmanship of Norway and the possible topics/themes to be chosen.

Finally, I would like to thank the Norwegian authorities for the excellent organisation of the Conference and for the warm hospitality shown to us all.


2.   Future visits

Budapest: Regional Conference on “Roma in an expanding Europe: challenges for the future” organised by the World Bank, 30 June – 1 July 2003


Appendix I

Statement by the Secretary General,

Mr Walter Schwimmer,

to the

Meeting of Ministers of Foreign Affairs

of the Central European Initiative

(Wroclaw, 12-13 June 2003)

In a referendum held last Sunday, the Polish people very strongly signalled their wish for fuller European integration.  I would like to congratulate Poland and the other CEI member States, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Slovakia and Slovenia, on their forthcoming accession to the European Union..

The European Union thus will have soon 25 members. Others are hoping to join too. However, many European States will not join for the moment. This will be reflected in the membership of our two institutions: an increasing number of our members will also be EU members but almost as many will remain outside the EU. This fact should not create new dividing lines! There is only One Europe: the continent with its over 800 million Europeans. Since 1989, the Council of Europe, which was founded forty years earlier to overcome conflicts, has made it possible for the One Europe, based on common values, to come about.

I would like to thank the many members of the Convention that in this, and other respects, continue to draw attention to the Council of Europe’s role.

As I stated in my contribution to the Convention on the future of Europe, I consider that the European Union should make full use of the CoE’s instruments and institutions. I, therefore, was very pleased to note that now when the Convention on the future of Europe approaches its final stage, the draft constitution proposes a clear legal basis which would permit the EU to accede to the European Convention on Human Rights. Such an accession is indeed essential for the future of our continent.

This brings me to the future role of the Council of Europe in building a Europe without dividing lines. Much reflection is currently going on on how to structure the European Union’s foreign policy with regard to those European States that are either unable, or unwilling, to join the European Union at present. To all those involved, I have a very clear message: Do use what is there and what has proved its value.

There is no need to invent new structures for political co-operation, or set up elaborate new mechanisms for consultation. The Council of Europe brings together, as equal partners, all the States of the One Europe. We should be imaginative in structuring our relationship, and dare to break new ground. We should reflect on the possibilities of how to make the European Union an “associate member” of the Council of Europe by taking into account the sui generis status of the EU as a supra-national entity with competences and sovereign rights which are normally carried out by a State, but without (yet) being a State and certainly not having all the rights and competences of a sovereign State. So, as an “associate member” the EU would represent the 25 together in those areas where they have transferred the competences to the supra-national level.

Following proposals by the Parliamentary Assembly and myself, I was pleased that at their May session, you and your fellow Ministers agreed that the future role of the CoE in a new architecture for Europe and a concerted action between European institutions could be further elaborated at the Third Summit of Heads of State and Government of the Council of Europe, to be held most likely between autumn 2004 and spring 2005. I am grateful to those CEI governments that have already offered to host the Summit.

May I also briefly focus on a number of issues that are of major concern to our two institutions at this very moment: on the 3rd of April this year, the CoE welcomed Serbia and Montenegro as its 45th member.  This enlargement is of historical importance as it completes the accession of all south east European countries to our Organisation. The authorities need our full support in their political determination to fight the pernicious legacy left by the previous regime. Therefore, we have set up an enhanced co-operation programme with Serbia and Montenegro - complemented by a CoE-European Commission joint programme –to contribute to completing the considerable reforms under way.

For the Western Balkans, the Council of Europe welcomes the strong commitments of CEI to support these countries towards European integration. The Thessaloniki Summit of 21 June, gathering EU Members states, candidate countries and countries of the Western Balkans, will therefore create new opportunities for regional cooperation in which the Council of Europe will participate through its various programmes.

At the request of UNMiK, the Council of Europe is leading the decentralisation process in Kosovo to promote further democratisation and reconciliation. In our contacts with UNMIK, we also attach great value to the applicability of Council of Europe human rights standards in Kosovo. There should be no human rights gap in Europe.

In Bosnia and Herzegovina significant progress has been made in the fulfilment of the commitments entered into upon the country’s accession and joint efforts continue to ensure that the still fragile state construction continues on track.  We lend our full support to the country’s continued efforts towards institution building, in particular in the areas of the Judiciary and of local self-government, and we encourage a vigorous fighting against organised crime and corruption. Success in these areas are important conditions for sustainable returns of displaced persons and refugees.

The Council of Europe’s contribution to the full implementation of the Ohrid Agreement is another focal point of our action in the region.  In close co-operation with the EU-Special Representative in Skopje, the Council of Europe continues to provide expertise to the authorities of “the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia”, in particular with regard to decentralisation. Indeed, the finalisation of the laws on local finance and the redrawing of municipal boundaries are key elements in this process. May I also express my concern at the situation of a substantial group of Roma refugees at the Greek border. I would appeal to the authorities of the country to respect fully the applicable human rights and humanitarian standards to this vulnerable group.

The Council of Europe has a long-standing co-operation programme with Albania accompanying the path of reforms.  This work continues to be focused on the key area of the judiciary, including support for the School of Magistrates, which is one of the numerous joint programmes for the region undertaken with the European Commission.  Contribution to the ongoing electoral reform, as an essential part of internal political stability, remains another essential element of our co-operation with Albania. The new dynamics expected from the Thessaloniki meeting will warrant additional support on our side.

As far as Belarus’ possible accession to the CoE is concerned, I cannot but underline that the procedure will remain frozen until the four following steps are taken: a genuine parliament, freedom of the media, a moratorium on the death penalty and improved human rights protection (law on ombudsman, clarification on disappearances).  Unfortunately, recent news from Belarus has been mostly negative as major opposition newspapers have been suspended under a non-democratic procedure. 

I would like to seize this opportunity to confirm that the CoE remains committed to responding positively to steps in the right direction that, once more, I strongly invite the authorities of Belarus to take. We are ready to help. In the meantime, our Parliamentary Assembly pursues a dialogue with parliamentary delegations and members of the opposition.  We continue cooperation with non-governmental organisations and independent media.

The CoE continues providing active support for democratic reform in Ukraine. While we welcome the first results of the CoE action plan on the media reform, we also hope that full media freedom can be achieved more rapidly and with greater determination. The CoE’s “Venice Commission” is currently examining the proposals by President Kuchma for a constitutional reform.

Moldova assumes the Chairmanship of the Committee of Ministers since 15 May. This is an important development that deserve our attention. It symbolises the country’s integration into the European co-operation structures.  At the same time we continue our close co-operation in completing Moldova’s democratic reforms and fulfilling all its obligations as a member of the Council of Europe. On my own initiative, the political forces in Moldova have set up a Round-Table to promote political dialogue and to improve the functioning of parliamentary procedure.

In the framework of the Moldovan Chairmanship, the Council of Europe will lend its support to a Conference to be held in Octoberon “Frozen conflicts in Europe – the democratic security approach – the case of Transnistria”, that is meant to complement OSCE led international efforts to find a solution.

Trafficking in human beings constitutes an intolerable affront to human dignity and has rightly become an issue of great concern to citizens all over Europe. I am happy to inform you that the CoE will be preparing a European Convention against trafficking in human beings. This Convention should be geared towards the protection of victims’ rights and the respect for human rights, and aim at a proper balance between matters concerning human rights and prosecution. I count on your support so that the CoE can rapidly succeed in  this task  Failure to do so would result in continued immense suffering of thousands of often very young people.

Furthermore, I should like to address an issue that is of great concern to CEI countries, that is to say promoting human contacts and the free movement of Europeans on our continent. The Committee of Ministers of the CoE, at their last meeting, instructed their Deputies to identify possible new measures to be taken by the CoE in this area, taking into account the Schengen Agreement.

Another important new development is that the Committee of Ministers has decided to create a political platform for regular dialogue on migration issues with sending and transit countries to meet twice a year. Its main role will be to effectively implement a Council of Europe strategy for the orderly management of migration. The geographic dimension of the platform – 45 member States and several selected countries of origin, as well as the European Union and other international bodies – reflect the importance of involving all countries concerned to address this vital human issue. It also takes account of EU enlargement and the specific problems facing our Mediterranean partners.

Mr Chairman, may I once again stress the importance the CoE attaches to co-operating with the CEI. Convinced of the political importance of sub-regional co-operation as a factor for stability through the implementation of the CoE’s founding principles (pluralist democracy, human rights, rule of law) at grass-root level, as well as a contribution to the building of a common Europe without dividing lines, the Committee of Ministers adopted in May 2002 the “Vilnius Declaration on Regional Co-operation and the Consolidation of Democratic Stability in Greater Europe”.

In implementation of this Declaration, we, together with the Lithuanian authorities, organised this week in Vilnius a meeting of Sub-regional and continent-wide organisations on “Fighting corruption and organised crime”.

We greatly appreciate the contribution made by the CEI to this meeting. Our co-operation has also lead to the initiative for organising the “International Conference on cross-border and interregional co-operation”, to be held in Cracow next October.

With the enlargement of the EU, both the CEI and the CoE are facing a new situation where roughly half of their members will also be EU members, the other half remaining outside the EU. At regional and sub-regional level respectively, both Organisations can effectively contribute to create  a Europe without dividing lines. Do make use of the Council of Europe to press your points and get some of your ideas through.


Appendix II

Graz Conference of leaders of Islamic centres and Ulemas in Europe

Opening address by Mr Walter Schwimmer,
Secretary General of the Council of Europe
Graz, 13 June 2003

After the outstanding performance of the "Bosniak Choir of Graz" I would like to congratulate the organizers for an excellent choice of the musical programme. When we can equally enjoy the "Styrian Quartet" and the "Bosniak Choir" and both groups are from the same city, then that shows that we have started to recognize the richness of our cultural diversity!

The Austrian Foreign Minister referred in her inspiring introduction to the forthcoming enlargement of the European Union. The Council of Europe - which I represent here - has already accomplished its own enlargement, its still incredible enlargement. 15 years ago, there were only 22 member states in the organisation. Ten years ago, as Heads of State and government gathered in Vienna for the first ever Summit of the Council of Europe and took several key decisions. It were already 32 Member States

One of them was to progressively include in the European enterprise all those countries that would opt for democracy, human rights, the rule of law and respect for cultural diversity. As a result, we now have a "one Europe" of 45 member States and 800 million Europeans. One in eight of those Europeans is a Muslim, that means there are not less than 100 million Muslim Europeans.

Other decisions included the creation of a European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI), the strengthening of the European Court of Human rights and the creation of the first European and even international legal instrument for the protection of minorities.

At the highest political level, the message was thus quite clear: we want a wider Europe of peace and stability, based on respect for the equal dignity of all, offering to everyone effective protection of his/her fundamental rights and freedoms and meaningful opportunities for participation in political, civil and cultural life.

We should never forget this very ambitious programme, based on hard-learned lessons from our history, whatever the many shortcomings and failures in the implementation. This programme is also in essence that of the enlarging European Union. I am sure it can be supported by all religions.

Muslim citizen have important stakes in that programme.

In the many European countries where they constitute a religious minority, they are not supposed to hide their beliefs or fail to defend their individual rights and collective interests by lawful means. And they are entitled to expect the full protection of the law against racist speech and violence.

In recent years, ECRI has been concerned by indications that religious intolerance and prejudice against minority Muslim communities is increasing in European countries and that Islam is sometimes portrayed inaccurately on the basis of hostile stereotyping , which can reinforce discrimination.

In a specific policy recommendation adopted some three years ago, ECRI proposed a number of measures to address discrimination against those communities in areas such as access to citizenship, education and employment. It further called for the removal of unnecessary obstacles to the practice of religion, including any administrative bars to the construction of places of worship.

Of course, it will take much more than such measures to ensure harmony and a rewarding participation both in the wider civil society and in the political society.

Harmony, I suggest, will eventually result from a very active inter-religious and intercultural dialogue and from the remarkable efforts of many Muslim communities, notably their Imams or Ulemas, in providing interpretations of the faith that take into account the particular circumstances of contemporary Europe.

Such dialogue and work on the knowledge would reflect the most positive experiences of Muslim contribution to the European culture in the times of tolerance of El-Andalus or under Ottoman rule. The mayor of Graz quoted in his speech Aristoteles. So would call to our mind with gratitude that it were the Islamic scholars of El-Andalus who brought the knowledge about the Greek philosophers back to Europe and saved it for Europe.

There is little doubt that the huge extension of the UMMA or community of Muslims beyond lands of traditional Muslim rule, with the resulting difficulty of being a Muslim in a non-Muslim state, is a major challenge to leaders and thinkers to develop a theory of a minority Islam, some would rather say: an Islam separated from any political project or institution or they would even speak about a European Islam. In South East Europe, the challenge is somewhat different but it further includes overcoming the scars of an history that often mixed religious and political agendas.

Time does not allow to elaborate much on this. Let me mention some of the key questions.

The relation between religious communities and the democratic State must be properly organised, along the lines of "separation" of political and religious powers.

Europe is a community of rights and duties, a concept also well known in Islam. As any other believers, Muslims in Europe are expected to respect democratic laws , in particular on human rights, and States must in turn recognise them and treat Islam on an equal footing with all relevant religions, including in such areas as education and access to media.

Dialogue and partnership are also particularly needed in the Balkans to support the healing process and to lay the ground for more cohesive societies that, in turn, will make it possible for refugees and displaced persons to come home. We call it Linking Diversity. Muslim communities can and often do play a courageous role in that respect. I would like to thank the Reis-ul-Ulema Mustafa Ceric for his support and personal involvement.

Education plays a key role in inculcating basic knowledge and promoting empathy about religious diversity as well as democratic practices. The Council of Europe is therefore actively engaged in the development of standard curricula that should help teachers all over our continent to do precisely that. Becoming aware of the existence of other faiths and of their main features must become an indispensable part of any education in order to limit prejudice and hostility.

This is all the more needed in that an unprecedented wave of suicide-attacks in different parts of the world contributes to confusing minds and to spreading simplistic views about Jihad and the alleged radical antagonism between Islam and the West, including all of Europe.

Very often nowadays Samuel P. Huntingtons's book "The Clash of Civilisations" is quoted, but as I realised, very often by people who did not read it. Time and again, I have repeated my own conviction that the current situation does not reflect a clash of civilisations but a clash of ignorances. I strongly believe that Muslims communities in Europe can help bridging the understanding gap between Islam and the West.

In that spirit, I welcome the presence of the Secretary General of the Organisation of the Islamic Conference to this European meeting and I would like to thank the Organisers, in particular Minister Ferrero-Waldner for their initiative.

Religion and democracy have in common the concept of recognition and respect for others. In Europe today, it should mean all the others, without any further categories, distinctions or discriminations.

Let us together build the One Europe on this.


Appendix III

The role and responsibility of Health Ministers in meeting the challenges of the changes in society and new technology at the beginning of the third millennium

(To be checked against delivered speech)

Speech by Maud de Boer-Buquicchio,

Council of Europe Deputy Secretary General

12 June 2003

Putting dignity and human rights into practice - our response to societal and technological changes affecting health care

Dear Minister Høybråten, Ministers, Secretaries of State, Ladies and Gentlemen,

Last week, TIME MAGAZINE had ARTHRITIS as its cover story. The G-8 had access to basic treatment for AIDS-patients in Africa as its main topic as well as the outbreak of SARS (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome). These are three recent examples that show the importance of health, its global nature and its political implications, particularly with regard to individual rights of citizens and patients.

It could hardly be otherwise: health is an issue concerning life, well-being and death - an issue at the core of our existence. The link between health, dignity and human rights is enshrined in our basic texts.

The right to life in Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights, according to the case law of the European Court of Human Rights, puts a positive obligation on States to protect life and this may include the obligation to provide adequate public health care;

Private life under Article 8 of the European Convention of Human Rights includes a person's physical and psychological integrity, which has obvious implications for the organisation of health in our Member States;

In the same vein, Article 11 of the European Social Charter, by recognising "the right to the protection of health as a fundamental social right" enables the Council of Europe to strengthen health in all its aspects by setting minimum standards at the European level. In this context, a reference should also be made to the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine, where Article 2 establishes the primacy of the human being, whose interest and welfare shall always prevail over the sole interest of science and society. Article 3 establishes an inextricable link between equity and quality requiring the contracting parties to provide "equitable access to health care and of appropriate quality.".

The fact that protection of health is considered to be of paramount importance is also illustrated by the fact that a number of other fundamental rights and freedoms set forth in the European Convention on Human Rights may be subject to limitations for reasons related to the State's duty to protect the health of individuals or of society as a whole.

This is true for the right to respect for private life, the right to freedom of religion, of expression, of association and even that of individual liberty. The State's power in this respect is not unfettered. In such cases it is the State's duty to strike a fair balance between the general interest and that of the individual. Concrete examples come to my mind, such as the refusal by certain members of society to submit to a compulsory vaccination scheme on grounds of religious beliefs, the disclosure by the medical authorities to prison authorities of the suffering of an inmate with an infectious disease, the prohibition on advertisement of tobacco products.

As the European Court of Human Rights has frequently underlined, the European Convention is a living instrument. Thus, the rights enshrined in this Convention keep their relevance in our changing society.
So what is the significance of these texts today, in the face of the changes in society and developments in technology?

This Conference, rightly called Health, Dignity and Human Rights, is attempting to find a response to some of the more pressing challenges, and will not fail to be inspired by those basic concepts which for the last 50 years have given Europe solid foundations built on the dignity of the individual.

In this respect I would like to recall the importance of Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights which not only guarantees the right of every individual to impart information but also to receive information. It places a duty on States to properly inform the citizens of overall public health issues - in the aftermath of Chernobyl and most recently the lack of transparency on the part of the Chinese authorities at the outbreak of SARS (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome) are obvious examples.

It is therefore clear that the Council of Europe is an organisation, which gives primary importance to the ethical and human rights dimension in health care.

The European Convention on Human Rights is more than ever the beacon that spells out the principles to be followed.

What more added value does the Council of Europe provide in the area of health?

I can immediately give two more answers.

1. The Council of Europe is the only political organisation which has health care in its mandate, and where texts are adopted, not at the level of specialised ministries, but through its Committee of Ministers at the level of governments;

2. It is the Council of Europe,which considers health as the main source of human capital which promotes sustainable development and contributes to social cohesion.

Let me give you some examples, where the Council of Europe through the work carried out under the responsibility of the European Health Committee (CDSP) has successfully translated legal texts into health policy actions.

It is thanks to the achievements of the Council of Europe over decades that the principle of non-commercialisation of substances of human origin has been preserved, upheld and promoted in many countries.

The work of the Council of Europe in the field of blood transfusion shows clearly that you can combine ethical rigour and technical excellence. In fact, the standards elaborated by the Council of Europe in this field are the basis for many national guidelines, have been translated into more than 20 languages, and form the basis of legislation on blood safety in Australia.

What harm to our societies could have been avoided if the Council of Europe's Recommendation, which already back in 1983 warned of the possible transmission of AIDS by blood transfusion, had been applied by all our Member States?

As for the social aspects of health care, which are an integral part of the ethical dimension, examples abound.

The Recommendations on the organisational aspects of health care for the chronically-ill, securing and promoting the health of single-parent families, the ethical and organisational aspects of health care in prison, criteria for the management of waiting lists and waiting times in health care and the adaptation of health care services to the demands of people in marginal situations.

This series of Recommendations devoted to health care for vulnerable members of our societies led the Council of Europe to develop the principle of NO POOR MEDICINE FOR POOR PEOPLE.

On health issues, the Council of Europe does not act in isolation. Cooperation with partners is of paramount importance. To this effect the Council of Europe works in concert in particular with the WHO and the European Union. As added value, the Council of Europe introduces the social and human rights dimension into the various health issues.

On 19 June 2001 the relevant Health Services of the three organisations signed letters of intention committing themselves to working together on concrete projects. This unique example of co-operation between organisations has become a reference for other sectors within the Council of Europe. This exchange of letters was followed by a resolution of the WHO Regional Committee in September 2001 on the co-ordination of work with the Council of Europe in the field of health.

Concrete actions followed:

With the European Union, work carried out by the Council of Europe in the area of blood transfusion will be used in the implementation of the European Union blood Directive 2002/98/EC on blood safety.
It is intended to do likewise as regards the implementation of the EU Directive on safety and quality assurance on tissues and cells due to be adopted later this year.

With the WHO, the Dubrovnik Pledge signed in 2001 by Health Ministers of South Eastern Europe is jointly being implemented. The pledge includes a project on MEETING THE NEEDS OF VULNERABLE POPULATIONS IN SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE, a project, which is carried out within the framework of the Social Cohesion Initiative under the Stability Pact.

I should also mention the European Network of Health Promoting Schools (ENHPS) already set up in 1991 as a joint exercise of WHO, European Union and Council of Europe. Today more than 41 countries participate in this network.

But co-operation and co-ordination has to take place even within the Council of Europe itself. Co-operation with the Council of Europe Bank is gaining importance. The Bank, which has an exclusively social vocation, is co-financing projects for reforms in health systems.

I would like to use this opportunity to inform you that the Secretary General of the Council of Europe intends to integrate the activities of the Partial Agreement in the Social and Public Health Field into the ordinary budget of the intergovernmental level of all 45 Council of Europe Member States.

The aim of this plan is twofold, namely to streamline and rationalise these activities on the one hand and to extend the benefit of them to all countries of the Council of Europe on the other.

The final goal is to enhance co-operation and synergy in the various health-related activities within the Council of Europe.
The challenge ahead is to pursue our vocation to defend dignity, in meeting the challenges of a changing society and developments in technology. We must be able to feel the wind of change and to adapt our work accordingly.

Let me give you some examples:

- Our population is ageing with unavoidable consequences to our health care systems. Will our societies support a 40 % rise in health care costs between 2000 and 2050 due to ageing alone? Your last Conference had this topic already as its main issue. You called for the need for a balanced approach towards healthy ageing and in particular for a SOCIETY FOR ALL AGES;

- Our populations will be better informed. New information technologies such as the Internet will be the source of dramatic changes in the relationship between informed patients and health professionals. Its misuse can violate the right to privacy and confidentiality as well as the right of patients to full and accurate information.

- The application of genetics will have a major impact on the organisation of health care with implications on availability and financing of health in the Member States.

Ladies and Gentlemen,

Our Norwegian hosts celebrate next week in Bergen the 400th anniversary of their public health services. It was the starting point of the principle of equity and access to health care being introduced into national policy, a principle promoted today by the Council of Europe.

This celebration shows how national and European policies are interlinked today.

It will also be a fitting occasion to pay tribute to the outstanding contribution to world health of a great Norwegian citizen, Dr Gro Harlem Brundtland, who I am delighted to welcome among us here today.

I believe that the Council of Europe, as the pan-European organisation of 45 Member States promoting dignity and human rights, is the right forum to develop Continent wide responses to these challenges affecting health care.

With all the legal instruments in place, the Council of Europe is the appropriate body for ensuring that there will be no new dividing lines in Europe provided all our Member States enter into the same commitments.

The Council of Europe offers the ideal platform for the creation of a Greater Europe of Health and Social Cohesion, capable of meeting the needs of the entire Continent.

I wish you every success with your Conference.

Thank you for your attention.