MEETING OF THE CONFERENCE OF INGOS
Thursday 25 June 2015
1. Opening of the meeting by the President of the Conference of INGOs
Anna Rurka welcomed all the INGO representatives to the summer session and urged them to take on board the action plan which the Standing Committee was proposing for the next three years so as to show the Council of Europe how useful the Conference of INGOs was. The Conference had to play a full part in the “inclusive society” and in the fight against radicalisation, these being goals which had been reiterated by the Committee of Ministers. “Living together” and “doing together” had to be the guiding principles for all the INGOs in the Conference, alongside the other pillars of the Quadrilogue.
3. Synopsis of the meeting of 29 January 2015: for adoption
o Subject to this change, the synopsis was adopted unanimously.
4. Appointment of the meeting rapporteur and four tellers for the elections
· Jean-Michel Caudron was chosen as meeting rapporteur.
· The four tellers for the elections were:
o Jean-ClaudeGonon, European Association of Teachers;
o Julianne Lagadec, VOLONTEUROPE (Committee to Encourage Unpaid Voluntary Action in Countries of Europe);
o Simon Matthijssen, European Ombudsman Institute;
o Gilbert Nersson, International Council B’nai B’rith.
5. Election of a rapporteur of the Conference of INGOs
o 89 registered voters, 89 votes cast
· Anne Kraus was therefore elected as fourth Conference rapporteur.
She was focusing on four issues:
· Developing a culture of evaluating the Council of Europe’s policies within the departments.
· Negative campaigns were being conducted to belittle the role of the Court;
· Having skills when and where they were needed;
o of the Secretary General’s report on the “State of democracy, human rights and the rule of law in Europe – A shared responsibility for democratic security in Europe”, in particular, Chapter III on “Freedom of assembly and freedom of association”, by Adrian Evtuhovici, Head of Division, Platform for the Protection of Journalism, Directorate of Policy Planning;
She said the two sides needed to get to know one another better, by using the existing co-operation channels, even though joint consideration could be given to new forms of communication. Among other things, everybody could find the email addresses of the member states’ various delegations and send them messages. Meetings of Committee of Ministers’ rapporteur groups were confidential and INGOs could therefore not attend them, unless they were invited to provide expert input.
· To date, she had not known much about the Conference’s work;
· An annual hearing of the President of the Conference by the GR-DEM would be a priority measure;
Robert Drzagza, Chargé d’Affaires a.i., Deputy Permanent Representative of Poland to the Council of Europe, pointed out that the Conference of INGOs was the fourth pillar of the Council of Europe, and that the organisation needed it to make it better known in and better connected with society. He proposed that the Conference of INGOs hold its plenary meetings on Fridays and regularly invite the ambassadors to exchanges of views on topical issues.
· Appointment of the President of the Expert Council on NGO Law:
o Cyril Ritchie was re-appointed President;
o The President of the Conference would notify the President of Azerbaijan of the appointment on the Conference’s behalf.
· Discussion of the changes in legislation and in operating conditions for NGOs in the Russian Federation (Daria Miloslavskaya, member of the Expert Council on NGO Law), given the series of laws on “foreign agents” and “undesirable organisations” in the Russian Federation concerning NGOs allegedly receiving foreign funding:
o The President explained that a letter to the INGOs holding participatory status had been sent on the Conference’s behalf in order to determine the day-to-day impact of these laws on the NGO members of the Conference. She asked the representatives of the INGOs present to pass on any feedback they had had from members who were being prevented from operating by the new legislation.
10. Role and activities of the Council of Europe’s Advisory Council on Youth
11. To step aside
12. Information on initiatives of the Gender Equality Expert of the Conference of INGOs
Anne Nègre, Gender Equality Expert, expressed satisfaction at the success of the round table held the previous day with the participation of the Parliamentary Assembly Committee on Equality and Non-Discrimination in connection with the Istanbul Convention and asked all members to continue working with her informally
13. Validation of the Action Plan of the Conference of INGOs for the next two years
o 89 registered voters, 89 votes cast;
o The action plan was accordingly adopted.
14. Feedback from the thematic committees and adoption of texts
· “New disability strategy” (1 abstention);
· “The violation of economic, social and cultural rights by austerity measures: a serious threat to democracy” (3 abstentions, 1 vote against).
15. Other business
· Collective complaints procedure under the revised European Social Charter:
o Régis Brillat,Executive Secretary of the European Committee of Social Rights, had emphasised the importance of the European Social Charter collective complaints procedure at the meeting of the Human Rights Committee;
o Under the Turin Process, a training course run by the Conference and the Social Platform in partnership with the Academic Network on the European Social Charter and Social Rights (RACSE) and the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) was being held on the subject in Brussels on 22 September 2015. Any INGOs interested had until mid-July to register;
o INGOs which wished to be entitled to submit collective complaints to the European Committee of Social Rights had to submit their applications by 4 September 2015. Information on how to prepare the application files was available on the Social Charter Department website.
· Update on an ad hoc working group on young people, by Anne Kraus.
· 28 or 29 January 2016